Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

Computational Astrophysics, Data Science & AI/ML in Astronomy: A Perspective from Indian Community

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Indian computational astrophysics needs a merit-based national HPC allocation system, the paper argues.

desk verdict A useful, honest community vision document for Indian computational astrophysics; the only new data is a small survey, and the central HPC-allocation recommendation is a plausible analogy argument rather than a demonstrated result. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.03876 v1 pith:CZW7G7PL submitted 2025-01-07 astro-ph.IM

Prateek Sharma , Bhargav Vaidya , Yogesh Wadadekar , Jasjeet Bagla , Piyali Chatterjee , Shravan Hanasoge , Prayush Kumar , Dipanjan Mukherjee
show 2 more authors
Ninan Sajeeth Philip Nishant Singh
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.IM
keywords high-performancecomputingcomputationalastrophysicsAI/MLinastronomyIndianproposal-basedHPCallocationbigdatascientificworkforcetraining
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that India's astronomy community already produces strong science with limited computing resources, but its current decentralized access to national supercomputers is a bottleneck. To remain competitive, India should adopt a unified national framework in which researchers regularly apply for computational time through calls for proposals evaluated by domain experts and HPC specialists. The authors ground this recommendation in the international experience that proposal-driven access raises scientific impact, and in usage statistics showing that astronomy is among the heaviest consumers of supercomputing time worldwide. The case matters because it is a concrete policy proposal: if adopted, it would change how scarce national HPC time is distributed across all of Indian astronomy.

What carries the argument

The mechanism carrying the argument is the proposal-driven allocation cycle: regular calls for proposals, review by domain experts and HPC specialists, centralized coordination of all national supercomputing clusters, and a guaranteed fair share for host institutions. This is the same allocation machinery used in mature high-performance-computing ecosystems internationally, and the paper argues that transplanting it to India would maximize the scientific return from the national supercomputing investment.

What would settle it

Compare publication and citation rates per CPU-hour for Indian astronomy before and after a centralized, proposal-based allocation system is introduced; if output per core-hour does not rise while controlling for field, funding, and team size, the paper's central recommendation fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that India's competitiveness in computational astrophysics, data science, and AI/ML depends less on buying more hardware than on reorganizing access to the hardware it already has. It proposes a national framework with periodic calls for computational proposals, roughly four times a year, evaluated by programme committees drawn from research areas that use high-performance computing. The argument is that quick, transparent, merit-based allocation, rather than access tied to host institutions, yields better scientific return on investment. The paper supports this by reviewing global HPC usage patterns, which show astronomy as a top consumer of supercomputing cycles, and by presenting survey data on how the Indian community currently accesses and uses these resources.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that a centralized, proposal-based allocation system, proven in other countries, will improve scientific output in India relative to the current decentralized use of national clusters; this causal transfer is asserted rather than demonstrated from Indian data.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Indian researchers would get faster, fairer access to petaflop-scale clusters, allowing high-risk and high-impact projects to compete on scientific merit rather than institutional location.
  • Astronomy's HPC needs would become explicit in national planning, with periodic job-data analysis used to tune allocation policy for maximum scientific output.
  • A larger Indian workforce would be trained in HPC, data science, and AI/ML, with transferable skills that also benefit industry and other sciences.
  • Indian groups would be better positioned to contribute to major international collaborations that require massive simulations and data-intensive analysis.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper's focus on astronomy, the same centralized, proposal-based allocation logic could plausibly improve scientific output across all Indian computational sciences if applied to the entire national supercomputing portfolio.
  • The proposal-review framework itself requires a pool of trained domain-expert reviewers and HPC specialists; building that reviewer capacity is a prerequisite the paper does not address in detail.
  • The paper's community survey is based on only 29 responses, so a larger, systematic audit of HPC usage and needs across Indian institutions would be a natural test of the paper's portrait of the community.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This perspective paper, prepared by members of the Indian astronomy community, surveys the global landscape of high-performance computing, data science, and AI/ML in astrophysics; showcases representative computational research by Indian groups in solar physics, gravitational-wave astronomy, accretion and jets, galaxies, and cosmology; and argues that India should establish a national framework for regular, proposal-based allocation of HPC resources, modeled on ACCESS and PRACE. The paper also reports a small community survey (n=29) on HPC usage and AI/ML applications and closes with short- and long-term recommendations for training, data infrastructure, and industrial collaboration.

Significance. The paper's value lies in its broad synthesis of Indian computational astrophysics and in making an actionable policy proposal that is directly relevant to the national scientific community. The literature survey is wide-ranging, the catalog of community codes and representative Indian results is useful, and the list of concrete goals (schools, data centres, industry collaboration) provides a clear agenda. The central policy recommendation, however, is an argument from analogy: the only quantitative support is a US-based observational correlation, and no Indian-context baseline or evaluation plan is supplied. The paper is best read as a community vision document; as an evidence-based proposal it would be strengthened by clearly labeling the causal claim as a hypothesis and by adding a short methodological appendix on the survey. Its strengths—explicit priorities, a community-wide perspective, and concrete institutional proposals—are appropriate for the journal's perspective format.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract; §5.2 (third paragraph)] The paper's central policy claim is that centralized, proposal-based allocation of NSM clusters 'will help in a more efficient utilization and better scientific outcome.' The only quantitative support cited is Wang et al. (2018) in §2.1, an observational correlation from the US XSEDE ecosystem in which proposal selection by peer review confounds the relationship between HPC access and citation impact. The manuscript provides no baseline utilization or outcome metrics for current NSM clusters, so the reader cannot evaluate the causal claim. Please either reframe the claim as a testable hypothesis with a before/after monitoring plan, or explicitly label it as an analogy-based policy judgment and moderate the causal wording.
  2. [§5.2; §2.1] The manuscript treats 'efficient utilization' and 'better scientific outcome' as jointly achieved by a single reform, but these are distinct objectives and the text never defines a metric for either. The XSEDE citation addresses citation impact only, while the assertion in §2.1 that 'It is easy to achieve high utilisation ... without a significant scientific return' is unsupported and non-obvious. Please provide at least one concrete measurable quantity for each objective, and either supply evidence for the utilization–outcome decoupling or revise the sentence to present it as a motivating concern rather than an established fact.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§5.2; Figures 6–7] The survey of 29 respondents is described without any account of the survey instrument, sampling strategy, response rate, or the exact denominators for the percentages shown; please add a short methodological note and qualify any statement that these percentages represent the broader Indian community.
  2. [§2.3] There is a spelling error in 'observational facilitiies' in the first paragraph.
  3. [Table 1] The code name 'Athea++' in the table should be 'Athena++'.
  4. [§5.1] The recommendation that large projects 'must allocate at least 5-10% of the total funds to HPC systems' is stated without a source or worked example; please add a justification or an example of a project that has made such an allocation.
  5. [§2.1] The sentence 'The latest data from the top 500 cluster shows that India needs to invest heavily in HPC in order to catch up' is not accompanied by the relevant data or a comparison table; either show the data or delete the sentence.
  6. [References] The reference list contains several formatting inconsistencies (e.g., 'V olume' in Böhm-Vitense 1992, 'Colarado' in the contributors list) and mixes arXiv preprints with published versions without a consistent convention.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a community perspective whose policy recommendation is an argument from analogy, not a derivation that reduces to its own inputs.

full rationale

This manuscript is a perspective/vision-document chapter rather than a derivation, so most of the enumerated circularity patterns do not apply. The central claim—that India should establish a national framework for periodic, proposal-based HPC allocation modeled on ACCESS and PRACE—is a policy recommendation supported by an external citation (Wang et al. 2018) reporting that XSEDE-supported papers receive higher citations. That citation may be an imperfect or confounded piece of evidence, but it is not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, nor is it equivalent to the paper's recommendation by construction. The survey of 29 respondents (Section 5.2 and Figure 6) is used descriptively to illustrate current HPC and AI/ML usage; it does not generate a claimed prediction. The many self-citations in Section 3 document Indian community research activity; they are not used as a load-bearing authority to justify the central policy claim, and the policy claim does not reduce to the existence of those papers. A skeptical concern about missing Indian-context causal evidence is a correctness or evidentiary issue, not circularity under the defined patterns. No equation, fitted parameter, or derivation step can be quoted as being identical to its own input. Accordingly, the honest finding is no circularity, with score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's recommendations rest on several unvalidated domain assumptions, but no numerical free parameters are fitted and no new entities are proposed.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Access to advanced HPC resources increases citation impact and research quality.
    Cited to Wang et al. (2018) and XSEDE statistics; assumed transferable to India without local validation.
  • domain assumption Proposal-based peer review is the optimal method for allocating national HPC resources.
    Presented as the US/European model; no experimental or comparative evidence specific to India.
  • domain assumption India's A&A community is under-resourced and needs to remain globally competitive.
    Value judgment stated as fact in the introduction and summary.
  • domain assumption The 29 survey respondents are representative of the Indian A&A community.
    Only 29 self-selected responses; no methodology or sampling frame described.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Computational Astrophysics, Data Science & AI/ML in Astronomy: A Perspective from Indian Community." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CZW7G7PL

@misc{pith2026250103876,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Computational Astrophysics, Data Science & AI/ML in Astronomy: A Perspective from Indian Community},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CZW7G7PL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.03876}
}
read the original abstract

In contemporary astronomy and astrophysics (A&A), the integration of high-performance computing (HPC), big data analytics, and artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) has become essential for advancing research across a wide range of scientific domains. These tools are playing an increasingly pivotal role in accelerating discoveries, simulating complex astrophysical phenomena, and analyzing vast amounts of observational data. For India to maintain and enhance its competitive edge in the global landscape of computational astrophysics and data science, it is crucial for the Indian A&A community to fully embrace these transformative technologies. Despite limited resources, the expanding Indian community has already made significant scientific contributions. However, to remain globally competitive in the coming years, it is vital to establish a robust national framework that provides researchers with reliable access to state-of-the-art computational resources. This system should involve the regular solicitation of computational proposals, which can be assessed by domain experts and HPC specialists, ensuring that high-impact research receives the necessary support. By building such a system, India can cultivate the talent, infrastructure, and collaborative environment necessary to foster world-class research in computational astrophysics and data science.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.03876 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. figure 1. It is evident that close to 20% of the available [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gravitational physics in the context of Indian astronomy: A vision document

    astro-ph.IM 2025-01 unverdicted novelty 1.0 of 10

    A vision document reviews India's past and proposed future contributions to gravitational physics and recommends research priorities for the next two decades.

  2. Astrophysics with Compact Objects: An Indian Perspective, Present Status and Future Vision

    astro-ph.HE 2025-05 unverdicted

    A community-authored review of Indian compact-object astrophysics and a proposed roadmap for future investment in facilities, theory, and workforce.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T

    Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al . 2016, Phys. Rev. D, 94, 064035

    2016

  2. [2]

    S., Kembhavi, A., Wadadekar, Y

    Abraham, S., Philip, N. S., Kembhavi, A., Wadadekar, Y . G., & Sinha, R. 2012, MNRAS, 419, 80

    2012

  3. [3]

    2023, A&A, 671, A161

    Acharya, S., Vaidya, B., Kalpa Dihingia, I., Agarwal, S., & Shukla, A. 2023, A&A, 671, A161

    2023

  4. [4]

    Bagla, J. S. 2002, Journal of Astrophysics and Astron- omy, 23, 185

    2002

  5. [5]

    S., & Prasad, J

    Bagla, J. S., & Prasad, J. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 993

    2006

  6. [6]

    S., & Ray, S

    Bagla, J. S., & Ray, S. 2005, MNRAS, 358, 1076 J. Astrophys. Astr. (0000)000: Page 19 of 21

    2005

  7. [7]

    2021, MNRAS, 502, 3569

    Basak, A., & Nandy, D. 2021, MNRAS, 502, 3569

    2021

  8. [8]

    2023, ApJ, 954, 39 Bharati Das, S., Basak, A., Nandy, D., & Vaidya, B

    Biswas, A. 2023, ApJ, 954, 39 Bharati Das, S., Basak, A., Nandy, D., & Vaidya, B. 2019, ApJ, 877, 80

    2023

Show all 98 references
  1. [9]

    Bhattacharya, S., Bharati Das, S., Bugnet, L., Panda, S., & Hanasoge, S. M. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.17167 B¨ohm-Vitense, E. 1992, Introduction to Stellar Astro- physics: V olume 3

    2024 arXiv

  2. [10]

    2021, A&A, 649, A150

    Borse, N., Acharya, S., Vaidya, B., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, A150

    2021

  3. [11]

    D., & Lupsasca, A

    Chael, A., Johnson, M. D., & Lupsasca, A. 2021, ApJ, 918, 6

    2021

  4. [12]

    A., Adamo, J., et al

    Chen, Z., Huerta, E. A., Adamo, J., et al. 2021, Phys. Rev. D, 103, 084018

    2021

  5. [13]

    2022, MN- RAS, 512, 5010

    Choudhury, M., Datta, A., & Majumdar, S. 2022, MN- RAS, 512, 5010

    2022

  6. [14]

    P., Sharma, P., & Quataert, E

    Choudhury, P. P., Sharma, P., & Quataert, E. 2019, MN- RAS, 488, 3195

    2019

  7. [15]

    E., et al

    Deppe, N., H´ebert, F., Kidder, L. E., et al. 2022, Phys. Rev. D, 105, 123031

    2022

  8. [16]

    Dey, S., Chatterjee, P., O. V . S. N., M., et al . 2022, Nature Physics, 18, 595

    2022

  9. [17]

    Dhang, P., Bai, X.-N., & White, C. J. 2022, arXiv e- prints, arXiv:2208.02269

    2022 arXiv

  10. [18]

    2020, MNRAS, 494, 4854

    Dhang, P., Bendre, A., Sharma, P., & Subramanian, K. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 4854

    2020

  11. [19]

    2022, ApJ, 928, 188 —

    Dhanpal, S., Benomar, O., Hanasoge, S., et al. 2022, ApJ, 928, 188 —. 2023, ApJ, 958, 63

    2022

  12. [20]

    K., Vaidya, B., & Fendt, C

    Dihingia, I. K., Vaidya, B., & Fendt, C. 2021, MNRAS, 505, 3596 —. 2022, MNRAS, 517, 5032

    2021

  13. [21]

    2022, MNRAS, 510, 3561

    Dutta, A., Sharma, P., & Nelson, D. 2022, MNRAS, 510, 3561

    2022

  14. [22]

    A., & Hindman, B

    Featherstone, N. A., & Hindman, B. W. 2016, The As- trophysical Journal, 818, 32

    2016

  15. [23]

    R., & Khaire, V

    Gaikwad, P., Srianand, R., Choudhury, T. R., & Khaire, V . 2017, MNRAS, 467, 3172

    2017

  16. [24]

    G., et al

    Gaikwad, P., Rauch, M., Haehnelt, M. G., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 5091

    2020

  17. [25]

    2018, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1803.09010

    Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., et al. 2018, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1803.09010

    2018 arXiv

  18. [26]

    2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2210.14244

    Ghosh, S., Fragkoudi, F., Di Matteo, P., & Saha, K. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2210.14244

    2022 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Gopalakrishnan, K., & Singh, N. K. 2022, arXiv e- prints, arXiv:2206.04912

    2022 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Grover, H., Bait, O., Wadadekar, Y ., & Mishra, P. K. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 3313

    2021

  21. [29]

    Gupta, S., Caprioli, D., & Haggerty, C. C. 2021, ApJ, 923, 208

    2021

  22. [30]

    B., & Sharma, P

    Gupta, S., Nath, B. B., & Sharma, P. 2018, MNRAS, 479, 5220

    2018

  23. [31]

    Hanasoge, S. M. 2008, ApJ, 680, 1457 —. 2022, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 19, 3

    2008

  24. [32]

    2022, MNRAS, 517, L86

    Hota, A., Dabhade, P., Vaddi, S.,et al. 2022, MNRAS, 517, L86

    2022

  25. [33]

    2016, ApJ, 818, 76

    Jin, S., Li, S., Isella, A., Li, H., & Ji, J. 2016, ApJ, 818, 76

    2016

  26. [34]

    2019, MNRAS, 488, 1301

    Kumar, H. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 1301

    2019

  27. [35]

    D., White, J

    Jones, M. D., White, J. P., Innus, M., et al. 2017, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1703.00924

    2017 arXiv

  28. [36]

    2021, MNRAS, 501, 1143 K¨apyl¨a, P

    Kanjilal, V ., Dutta, A., & Sharma, P. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 1143 K¨apyl¨a, P. J. 2021, A&A, 655, A78 Kar Chowdhury, R., Roy, S., Chatterjee, S.,et al. 2021, Astronomische Nachrichten, 342, 164

    2021

  29. [37]

    B., K ¨apyl¨a, P

    Karak, B. B., K ¨apyl¨a, P. J., K¨apyl¨a, M. J., et al. 2015, A&A, 576, A26

    2015

  30. [38]

    K., & Das, M

    Kataria, S. K., & Das, M. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 1653

    2018

  31. [39]

    A., & Kumar, P

    Khan, A., Huerta, E. A., & Kumar, P. 2022, Phys. Lett. B, 835, 137505 Page 20 of 21 J. Astrophys. Astr. (0000) 000:

    2022

  32. [40]

    Khandai, N., & Bagla, J. S. 2009, Research in Astron- omy and Astrophysics, 9, 861

    2009

  33. [41]

    2015, MN- RAS, 450, 1349 Kishor Joshi, R., Debnath, S., & Chattopadhyay, I

    Khandai, N., Di Matteo, T., Croft, R., et al. 2015, MN- RAS, 450, 1349 Kishor Joshi, R., Debnath, S., & Chattopadhyay, I. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2205.10502

    2015 arXiv

  34. [42]

    C., Haehnelt, M

    Kulkarni, G., Keating, L. C., Haehnelt, M. G., et al . 2019, MNRAS, 485, L24

    2019

  35. [43]

    Kumar, A., Das, M., & Kataria, S. K. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 98 —. 2022, MNRAS, 509, 1262

    2021

  36. [44]

    E.,et al

    Kumar, P., Blackman, J., Field, S. E.,et al. 2019, Phys. Rev. D, 99, 124005

    2019

  37. [45]

    2020, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 7, 92

    Kumar, S., Paul, A., & Vaidya, B. 2020, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 7, 92

    2020

  38. [46]

    2021, ApJ, 921, 74

    Kundu, S., Vaidya, B., & Mignone, A. 2021, ApJ, 921, 74

    2021

  39. [47]

    Kundu, S., Vaidya, B., Mignone, A., & Hardcastle, M. J. 2022, A&A, 667, A138

    2022

  40. [48]

    E., Thompson, N

    Leiserson, C. E., Thompson, N. C., Emer, J. S., et al. 2020, Science, 368, eaam9744

    2020

  41. [49]

    D., & Yan, H

    Makwana, K. D., & Yan, H. 2020, Physical Review X, 10, 031021

    2020

  42. [50]

    2022, ApJS, 262, 23

    Mayank, P., Vaidya, B., & Chakrabarty, D. 2022, ApJS, 262, 23

    2022

  43. [51]

    K., & Bagla, J

    Meena, A. K., & Bagla, J. S. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 3294

    2020

  44. [52]

    C., Anderson, J., et al

    Mishra, B., Fragile, P. C., Anderson, J., et al . 2022, ApJ, 939, 31

    2022

  45. [53]

    2018, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1810.03993

    Mitchell, M., Wu, S., Zaldivar, A., et al. 2018, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1810.03993

    2018 arXiv

  46. [54]

    2021, MN- RAS, 500, 5072

    Mohapatra, R., Federrath, C., & Sharma, P. 2021, MN- RAS, 500, 5072

    2021

  47. [55]

    2022, MNRAS, 510, 2327

    Mohapatra, R., Jetti, M., Sharma, P., & Federrath, C. 2022, MNRAS, 510, 2327

    2022

  48. [56]

    2022, arXiv e- prints, arXiv:2207.09326

    Mukherjee, A., Prix, R., & Wette, K. 2022, arXiv e- prints, arXiv:2207.09326

    2022 arXiv

  49. [57]

    V ., Sutherland, R., & Wag- ner, A

    Mukherjee, D., Bicknell, G. V ., Sutherland, R., & Wag- ner, A. 2016, MNRAS, 461, 967

    2016

  50. [58]

    V ., Wagner, A

    Mukherjee, D., Bicknell, G. V ., Wagner, A. Y ., Suther- land, R. S., & Silk, J. 2018, MNRAS, 479, 5544

    2018

  51. [59]

    2020, MNRAS, 499, 681

    Vaidya, B. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 681

    2020

  52. [60]

    2019, MN- RAS, 490, 3234

    Nelson, D., Pillepich, A., Springel, V .,et al. 2019, MN- RAS, 490, 3234

    2019

  53. [61]

    2020, MN- RAS, 498, 2391

    Nelson, D., Sharma, P., Pillepich, A., et al. 2020, MN- RAS, 498, 2391

    2020

  54. [62]

    K., Sasikumar Raja, K., et al

    Oberoi, D., Bisoi, S. K., Sasikumar Raja, K., et al . 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2211.03791

    2022 arXiv

  55. [63]

    K., Dhanpal, S., Murphy, S

    Panda, S. K., Dhanpal, S., Murphy, S. J., Hanasoge, S., & Bedding, T. R. 2024, ApJ, 960, 94

    2024

  56. [64]

    2021, Physics of Plasmas, 28, 082903

    Paul, A., & Vaidya, B. 2021, Physics of Plasmas, 28, 082903

    2021

  57. [65]

    2022, ApJ, 938, 130

    Paul, A., Vaidya, B., & Strugarek, A. 2022, ApJ, 938, 130

    2022

  58. [66]

    2020, A&A, 633, A59

    Paul, S., Salunkhe, S., Sonkamble, S., et al . 2020, A&A, 633, A59

    2020

  59. [67]

    S., Wadadekar, Y ., Kembhavi, A., & Joseph, K

    Philip, N. S., Wadadekar, Y ., Kembhavi, A., & Joseph, K. B. 2002, A&A, 385, 1119

    2002

  60. [68]

    2018, MNRAS, 475, 648

    Pillepich, A., Nelson, D., Hernquist, L., et al . 2018, MNRAS, 475, 648

    2018

  61. [69]

    2015, ApJ, 811, 108 —

    Prasad, D., Sharma, P., & Babul, A. 2015, ApJ, 811, 108 —. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 1531 Pratap Rajvanshi, M., & Bagla, J. S. 2018, J. Cosmol- ogy Astropart. Phys., 2018, 018

    2015

  62. [70]

    P., & Bagla, J

    Rajvanshi, M. P., & Bagla, J. S. 2020, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 37, 235008

    2020

  63. [71]

    P., Singh, A., Jassal, H

    Rajvanshi, M. P., Singh, A., Jassal, H. K., & Bagla, J. S. 2021, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 38, 195001

    2021

  64. [72]

    2023, arXiv:2302.00666

    Kumar, P. 2023, arXiv:2302.00666

    2023 arXiv

  65. [73]

    B., Sharma, P., & Shchekinov, Y

    Roy, A., Nath, B. B., Sharma, P., & Shchekinov, Y . 2013, MNRAS, 434, 3572

    2013

  66. [74]

    T., Bansal, M., & Wadadekar, Y

    Samudre, A., George, L. T., Bansal, M., & Wadadekar, Y . 2022, MNRAS, 509, 2269

    2022

  67. [75]

    2017, ApJ, 851, 120

    Sarkar, A., Vaidya, B., Hazra, S., & Bhattacharyya, J. 2017, ApJ, 851, 120

    2017

  68. [76]

    C., Mondal, S., Sharma, P., & Piran, T

    Sarkar, K. C., Mondal, S., Sharma, P., & Piran, T. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2211.12967

    2022 arXiv

  69. [77]

    C., Nath, B

    Sarkar, K. C., Nath, B. B., & Sharma, P. 2015, MN- RAS, 453, 3827 J. Astrophys. Astr. (0000)000: Page 21 of 21

    2015

  70. [78]

    Schumacher, J., & Sreenivasan, K. R. 2020, Rev. Mod. Phys., 92, 041001

    2020

  71. [79]

    2021, ApJ, 923, 178

    Sen, S., & Pant, V . 2021, ApJ, 923, 178

    2021

  72. [80]

    Sharma, P., McCourt, M., Quataert, E., & Parrish, I. J. 2012, MNRAS, 420, 3174

    2012

  73. [81]

    2017, Phys

    Shibata, M., Fujibayashi, S., Hotokezaka, K., et al . 2017, Phys. Rev. D, 96, 123012

    2017

  74. [82]

    K., Sharma, K., Mishra, S

    Singh, B., Srivastava, A. K., Sharma, K., Mishra, S. K., & Dwivedi, B. N. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2202.00501

    2022 arXiv

  75. [83]

    K., Brandenburg, A., Chitre, S

    Singh, N. K., Brandenburg, A., Chitre, S. M., & Rhein- hardt, M. 2015, MNRAS, 447, 3708

    2015

  76. [84]

    K., Brandenburg, A., & Rheinhardt, M

    Singh, N. K., Brandenburg, A., & Rheinhardt, M. 2014, ApJ, 795, L8

    2014

  77. [85]

    K., Raichur, H., & Brandenburg, A

    Singh, N. K., Raichur, H., & Brandenburg, A. 2016, ApJ, 832, 120

    2016

  78. [86]

    K., Raichur, H., K ¨apyl¨a, M

    Singh, N. K., Raichur, H., K ¨apyl¨a, M. J., et al . 2020, Geophysical and Astrophysical Fluid Dynam- ics, 114, 196

    2020

  79. [87]

    K., Shetye, J., Murawski, K.,et al

    Srivastava, A. K., Shetye, J., Murawski, K.,et al. 2017, Scientific Reports, 7, 43147

    2017

  80. [88]

    2021, MNRAS, 501, 3332

    Sur, S., Basu, A., & Subramanian, K. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 3332

    2021

  81. [89]

    2020, MNRAS, 493, 4808

    Surana, S., Wadadekar, Y ., Bait, O., & Bhosale, H. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 4808

    2020

  82. [90]

    2018, ApJ, 865, 144

    Vaidya, B., Mignone, A., Bodo, G., Rossi, P., & Mas- saglia, S. 2018, ApJ, 865, 144

    2018

  83. [91]

    2017, MNRAS, 472, 3147

    Rickler, L. 2017, MNRAS, 472, 3147

    2017

  84. [92]

    E., Scheel, M

    Varma, V ., Field, S. E., Scheel, M. A.,et al. 2019, Phys. Rev. Research., 1, 033015

    2019

  85. [93]

    2023, Journal of Astrophysics and As- tronomy, 44, 9

    Wadadekar, Y ., Bhattacharya, D., Datta, A., Paul, S., & Oberoi, D. 2023, Journal of Astrophysics and As- tronomy, 44, 9

    2023

  86. [94]

    2018, in Proposal Submission Tools Workshop, 9

    Wadadekar, Y ., Valame, S., Chengalur, J.,et al. 2018, in Proposal Submission Tools Workshop, 9

    2018

  87. [95]

    v., Whitson, T.,et al

    Wang, F., Laszewski, G. v., Whitson, T.,et al. 2018, in Proceedings of the Practice and Experience on Ad- vanced Research Computing, 1–8

    2018

  88. [96]

    A., Yun, M.,et al

    Wei, W., Huerta, E. A., Yun, M.,et al. 2021, Astrophys. J., 919, 82

    2021

  89. [97]

    N., Prather, B

    Wong, G. N., Prather, B. S., Dhruv, V ., et al . 2022, ApJS, 259, 64

    2022

  90. [98]

    Yadav, N., Mukherjee, D., Sharma, P., & Nath, B. B. 2017, MNRAS, 465, 1720

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.