Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 7 minor 122 references

Thermal Transport Properties of Magnons on the $\alpha$-T$_3$ Lattice

T0 review · 1 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper predicts that magnons on the alpha-T3 lattice form one trivial and three Chern insulating phases, and that the thermal Hall conductivity's magnitude, not its sign, reveals the phase boundaries.

desk verdict A clean and honest model calculation giving the magnon phase diagram of α-T3, with a real but acknowledged soft spot in the high-temperature thermal Hall curves. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.03979 v1 pith:MLB2ZOYL submitted 2025-01-07 cond-mat.mes-hall

Luqman Saleem , Hasan M. Abdullah , Udo Schwingenschlogl , Aurelien Manchon This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords alpha-T3latticemagnonstopologicalmagnoninsulatorChernnumberthermalHallconductivityDzyaloshinskii-Moriyainteractionspin-wavetheoryflatband
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper works out the magnon physics of the $\alpha$-T$_3$ lattice, a honeycomb lattice with an extra atom at every hexagon center whose coupling strength $\alpha$ interpolates between the honeycomb lattice ($\alpha=0$) and the dice lattice ($\alpha=1$). Using atomistic spin dynamics and linear spin-wave theory, it shows that next-nearest-neighbor exchange together with easy-axis anisotropy stabilizes ferromagnetic order even when Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction would otherwise drive a spiral. It then computes a topological phase diagram with one trivial magnon insulator and three magnon Chern insulators, labeled by band Chern numbers $(0,0,0)$, $(0,1,-1)$, $(2,-1,-1)$, and $(2,-2,0)$. The central transport claim is that the magnon thermal Hall conductivity never changes sign at the topological phase boundaries, while its magnitude shows distinct kinks, with the lowest magnon band's Chern number dominating the response.

What carries the argument

The object that carries the argument is the momentum-space magnon Hamiltonian $h(\mathbf{k})$, a $3\times 3$ matrix built from nearest-neighbor, next-nearest-neighbor, Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya, and easy-axis-anisotropy terms after a Holstein-Primakoff transformation keeping only quadratic magnon operators. Its three bands have Berry curvature $\Omega^z_{n,\mathbf{k}}$, whose Brillouin-zone integral gives the Chern numbers $(C_1,C_2,C_3)$ that label the phases. The thermal Hall conductivity is computed from the per-band formula with the weight function $c_2(\epsilon_{n,\mathbf{k}})$, which decreases as the band energy rises and therefore acts like a temperature-dependent activation function; that is why the lowest band dominates at low temperature and why equal Chern numbers do not imply equal band contributions.

What would settle it

A concrete check would be to repeat the Chern-number and thermal Hall calculation with the next order of the Holstein-Primakoff expansion, or with exact diagonalization on finite clusters, especially in the flat-band regime; if the Chern numbers change or $\kappa_{xy}$ changes sign when interactions are included, the central claim would fail. On the experimental side, a thermal Hall measurement on a candidate ferromagnetic $\alpha$-T$_3$ material should look for the predicted magnitude kinks at the four-phase boundaries and for a $\kappa_{xy}$ that stays negative across them.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a tunable magnon Chern phase diagram on the $\alpha$-T$_3$ lattice. The authors derive the $3\times 3$ magnon Hamiltonian from a Heisenberg model with nearest-neighbor, next-nearest-neighbor, Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya, and easy-axis-anisotropy terms, and show that the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, not the lattice geometry alone, generates the nontrivial band topology. They find that the thermal Hall conductivity is negative in every phase, that bands with larger $|C_n|$ contribute more, and that even a band with $C_n=0$ can contribute a finite amount because the Berry curvature does not vanish locally. The flat band, despite a diverging density of states, contributes nothing to either $\kappa_{xx}$ or $\kappa_{xy}$, because its group velocity is zero. The authors interpret the magnitude kinks at phase boundaries as signatures of the magnon edge states that appear in the Chern insulator phases.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the quadratic Holstein-Primakoff Hamiltonian, i.e., linear spin-wave theory, describes the magnon bands and transport accurately enough, so that magnon-magnon interactions can be neglected at the temperatures considered.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In a ferromagnetic $\alpha$-T$_3$ material, tuning $\alpha$ and the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya strength should sweep the system through four magnon topological phases without ever reversing the sign of the thermal Hall current.
  • Thermal Hall measurements should observe kinks in $|\kappa_{xy}|$ at the predicted phase boundaries, and the kinks should sharpen as temperature rises and higher magnon bands become thermally activated.
  • The lowest band's Chern number controls the response: phases with $C_1=2$ give a larger $|\kappa_{xy}|$ than phases with $C_1=0$, even though bands with equal Chern numbers can contribute differently.
  • The flat band of the lattice does not enhance heat transport despite its divergent density of states, because its group velocity vanishes.
  • Bilayers of ferromagnetic honeycomb monolayers or (111)-grown trilayers of cubic ferromagnets are candidate platforms for realizing the predicted phases.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Including magnon-magnon interactions beyond the quadratic Holstein-Primakoff level could renormalize the flat-band response, which is where the linear treatment is least safe; the predicted Chern numbers and $\kappa_{xy}$ should therefore be viewed as the low-temperature limit.
  • Because the sign of $\kappa_{xy}$ is the same in all four phases, an experiment that only measures the sign of the thermal Hall effect cannot identify the phase; the magnitude and its temperature dependence carry the information.
  • The same Berry-curvature structure should also appear in other magnon transport responses, such as the spin Nernst or magnon orbital Nernst effects, giving independent experimental checks.
  • Since $\alpha$-T$_3$ geometries can be engineered in oxide heterostructures and artificial nanomagnet arrays, the phase diagram may be testable in systems far from the van der Waals ferromagnets suggested in the paper.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper studies magnons on the α-T3 lattice, a three-site honeycomb-derived lattice interpolating between the honeycomb (α=0) and dice (α=1) limits. Starting from a Heisenberg Hamiltonian with nearest-neighbor, next-nearest-neighbor, DM, and easy-axis anisotropy terms, the authors derive a quadratic Holstein-Primakoff magnon Hamiltonian, verify the ferromagnetic ground state with atomistic spin dynamics simulations, and compute Chern numbers and the thermal Hall conductivity for the three magnon bands. They identify one trivial (0,0,0) and three Chern (0,1,−1), (2,−1,−1), and (2,−2,0) phases in the α–D/J1 plane, and report that κxy does not change sign at the phase boundaries while its magnitude changes. The honeycomb and dice limits are reproduced.

Significance. If the results are correct, the paper provides a useful extension of topological magnonics to the tunable α-T3 lattice, with a complete phase diagram and thermal-transport signatures. The work reproduces the known honeycomb magnon spectrum at α=0 and the flat band in the dice limit, and the Chern numbers of the three bands sum to zero in all phases. The transport coefficients are computed directly from the microscopic spin Hamiltonian without any fitting, and the paper clearly states its central limitation—the neglect of magnon-magnon interactions at finite temperature. These strengths make the paper a potentially valuable contribution, provided the temperature range of the transport claims is resolved.

major comments (1)
  1. [III C, Fig. 7] The central transport results are presented at T=30 K, but the internal energy scale implied by Fig. 7(f)—a flat-band DOS divergence at 3 meV for S=1, which for the dice limit (α=1, J2=D=0) corresponds to 3 J1 S—sets J1≈1 meV. At T=30 K, kBT≈2.6 J1, so the Bose occupations of the low-lying magnon bands are of order unity or larger, placing the calculation outside the regime where the quadratic Holstein-Primakoff Hamiltonian of Eq. (4) is controlled. The authors themselves state in §II A that this truncation is valid only at low temperature and that magnon-magnon interactions are neglected; their assertion that the qualitative conclusions are unaffected is not backed by any estimate or calculation. Because the headline claim—sign invariance of κxy across topological phase boundaries with changes in magnitude—is extracted from the T=30 K data in Fig. 7, this is a load-bearing gap. I suggest either restricting the transport claims to temperatures with kBT≪J1, or providing a quantitative estimate of the interaction corrections (e.g., a one-loop self-energy calculation) to show that the sign and magnitude pattern survive.
minor comments (7)
  1. [II A, Eq. (1)] The easy-axis anisotropy term is written with a sum over nearest-neighbor pairs ⟨i,j⟩, but a single-site anisotropy should be summed over sites i; as written, the term is dimensionally ambiguous and should be corrected.
  2. [III A] The abstract states that next-nearest neighbor hopping and easy-axis anisotropy stabilize ferromagnetic order, but the transport calculations set JK/J1=0 throughout; the role of the anisotropy in the reported transport results is therefore not demonstrated, and the text should clarify the relationship between the spin-dynamics stability analysis and the Hamiltonian used for transport.
  3. [Fig. 7(f)] The density of states in this panel is computed for J2=D=0 (the dice limit), while the transport results in Fig. 7(a–e) use J2/J1=0.3 and D>0; the text should explicitly state that the flat-band divergence is an illustration of the α=1 limit, not a feature of the parameter range used in the transport calculations.
  4. [Title] There is a missing space between the word 'the' and 'α-T3' in the title on the first line.
  5. [Acknowledgments] The sentence 'The authors thanks A. S. Alzahrani' should read 'The authors thank A. S. Alzahrani'.
  6. [II C, Eq. (12)] The value of the broadening η used for the κxx calculation is not specified; please state it in the text or caption.
  7. [Conclusion] The sentence claiming that flat bands do not contribute to κxx and κxy due to vanishing group velocities is misleading because the flat-band divergence is a property of the α=1, J2=0 limit, whereas the transport calculations are performed at α values away from 1 and with J2>0; please qualify this statement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the phase diagram and thermal Hall conductivities are computed directly from the spin Hamiltonian without fitting, and the few self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. The magnon Hamiltonian h(k) is obtained explicitly from the spin Hamiltonian via the quadratic Holstein-Primakoff transformation in Eqs. (1)-(5), with no parameter fitted to the transport target. Chern numbers are integrals of the Berry curvature computed from these bands via Eqs. (8)-(9), and the thermal Hall conductivity is the weighted integral of the same curvature with the Bose function via Eqs. (10)-(11); the sign and magnitude statements in Figs. 5-7 are numerical consequences of those expressions, not inputs. The self-citations [51] and [57] supply the standard thermal Hall formula and the convention of labeling phases by (C1,C2,C3); neither injects a result that forces the alpha-T3 phase diagram, and the formula itself is standard and parameter-free. The acknowledged restriction to linear spin-wave theory in Section II A is a validity limitation, not a circular step, because no fitted effective parameter is later relabeled as a prediction. The concern about T = 30 K lying outside the strictly low-temperature regime is a correctness and robustness issue, not a circularity issue. Therefore no prediction reduces by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calculation depends on a hand-chosen J2/J1 ratio, an implicit energy scale for J1, and the standard linear spin-wave approximation. No new particles or mediators are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • J2/J1 = 0.3
    Chosen by hand to make the middle magnon band dispersive and to stabilize ferromagnetic order; not derived from a material. Fixed in most of the phase diagram.
  • S = 1
    Spin length set to unity for simplicity; all energies scale linearly with S, so this fixes the energy unit.
  • a = 1 nm
    Lattice constant set to 1 nm for the Brillouin zone; it drops out of the dimensionless physics.
  • J1 = 1 meV (implicit)
    Figure 7(f) shows the flat band at 3 meV, which implies J1 = 1 meV, but the text never states this value. This sets the temperature scale in Figs. 5-7.
  • eta = 0.01 J1
    Broadening parameter used in the density of states calculation in Eq. (13).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The quadratic Holstein-Primakoff expansion is valid at low temperature.
    The magnon Hamiltonian in Eq. (4) keeps only quadratic terms; the authors state that this is valid at low T and that higher-order corrections are out of scope.
  • domain assumption The ferromagnetic ground state is established by atomistic spin dynamics and persists for the parameters used in the transport calculation.
    Section III A uses 10x10 cells to map the ferromagnetic region; the phase diagram assumes this order in the thermodynamic limit.
  • domain assumption The DM interaction sign convention follows the honeycomb lattice pattern.
    Section II A adopts the out-of-plane DM interaction with nu_ij = +/-1 analogous to Ref. [91].
  • standard math Bosonic Chern number and thermal Hall formulas apply to the noninteracting magnon model.
    Eqs. (8)-(10) are standard for topological magnons; the Hamiltonian has no pairing terms, so it is a regular tight-binding model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Thermal Transport Properties of Magnons on the $\alpha$-T$_3$ Lattice." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MLB2ZOYL

@misc{pith2026250103979,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Thermal Transport Properties of Magnons on the $\alpha$-T$_3$ Lattice},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MLB2ZOYL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.03979}
}
abstract

We theoretically investigate magnons on the $\alpha$-T$_3$ lattice. Atomistic spin dynamics simulations show that next-nearest neighbor hopping and easy-axis anisotropy stabilize ferromagnetic order in the presence of Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction. We identify one topologically trivial magnon insulator phase and three magnon Chern insulator phases. The topologically trivial magnon insulator phase exhibits a small but non-zero magnon thermal Hall conductivity, while in the magnon Chern insulator phases the Chern number of the lowest magnon band dominates the magnon thermal Hall conductivity. The sign of the magnon thermal Hall conductivity does not change at the topological phase boundaries, but distinct changes are observed in the magnitude.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.03979 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Energy density and (b-d) densities of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a), reproducing the results of Ref. [91]. The dice ferromagnet exhibits two dispersive bands (lower and up￾per) and one flat band (middle) for J2/J1 = D/J1 = 0. The lower and middle bands touch each other at the K￾and K’-points, while the upper band is separated by a band gap of at least 3J1S (as the coordination num￾ber of sublattice B is twice that of sublattices A and C). J2/J1 ̸= 0 makes the middle band dispers… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Chern numbers of the (a) lower, (b) middle, and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a-d) Berry curvature of the lowest magnon band and (e-h) magnon thermal Hall conductivity and band contributions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) Magnon thermal Hall conductivity along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

122 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bloch, ¨Uber die Quantenmechanik der Elektronen in Kristallgittern, Z

    F. Bloch, ¨Uber die Quantenmechanik der Elektronen in Kristallgittern, Z. Phys. 52, 555 (1929)

    1929

  2. [2]

    Bansil, H

    A. Bansil, H. Lin, and T. Das, Colloquium: Topological 7 FIG. 7. (a) Magnon thermal Hall conductivity along the rectangular path defined in Figure 4(d) at different tempera- tures. Magnon thermal Hall conductivities of the (b) lower, (c) middle, and (d) upper magnon bands as well as (e) to- tal magnon thermal Hall conductivity in the α-D/J1 plane at T = 3...

    2016

  3. [3]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  4. [4]

    They become more pronounced at higher T , as higher magnon bands be- come activated

    While κxy does not change sign at the topological phase boundaries, kinks are evident. They become more pronounced at higher T , as higher magnon bands be- come activated. Figure 7(b-e) shows κn xy and κxy in the α-D/J1 plane at T = 30 K. κn xy exhibits sharp changes at the topological phase boundaries in agreement with the changes of Cn, see Figure 4(a-c...

  5. [5]

    Tokura, K

    Y. Tokura, K. Yasuda, and A. Tsukazaki, Magnetic topological insulators, Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 126 (2019)

    2019

  6. [6]

    Bauer and C

    S. Bauer and C. A. Bobisch, Nanoscale electron trans- port at the surface of a topological insulator, Nat. Com- mun. 7, 11381 (2016)

    2016

  7. [7]

    Yan and S.-C

    B. Yan and S.-C. Zhang, Topological materials, Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 096501 (2012)

    2012

  8. [8]

    Kohno, O

    M. Kohno, O. A. Starykh, and L. Balents, Spinons and triplons in spatially anisotropic frustrated antiferromag- nets, Nat. Phys. 3, 790 (2007)

    2007

Show all 122 references
  1. [9]

    S. Yan, D. A. Huse, and S. R. White, Spin-liquid ground state of the S = 1/2 Kagome Heisenberg antiferromag- net, Science 332, 1173 (2011)

    2011

  2. [10]

    Z. Ying, S. Zhang, B. Chen, B. Jia, F. Fei, M. Zhang, H. Zhang, X. Wang, and F. Song, Experimental evi- dence for dissipationless transport of the chiral edge state of the high-field Chern insulator in MnBi2Te4 nan- odevices, Phys. Rev. B 105, 085412 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    Nadj-Perge, I

    S. Nadj-Perge, I. K. Drozdov, J. Li, H. Chen, S. Jeon, J. Seo, A. H. MacDonald, B. A. Bernevig, and A. Yaz- dani, Observation of Majorana fermions in ferromag- netic atomic chains on a superconductor, Science 346, 602 (2014)

    2014

  4. [12]

    A. M. Essin, J. E. Moore, and D. Vanderbilt, Magneto- electric polarizability and axion electrodynamics in crys- talline insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 146805 (2009)

    2009

  5. [13]

    Fu and C

    L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Superconducting proximity effect and Majorana fermions at the surface of a topological insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 096407 (2008)

    2008

  6. [14]

    Castelnovo, R

    C. Castelnovo, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Magnetic monopoles in spin ice, Nature 451, 42 (2008)

    2008

  7. [15]

    X.-L. Qi, R. Li, J. Zang, and S.-C. Zhang, Inducing a magnetic monopole with topological surface states, Science 323, 1184 (2009)

    2009

  8. [16]

    D. M. Nenno, C. A. C. Garcia, J. Gooth, C. Felser, and P. Narang, Axion physics in condensed-matter systems, Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 682 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Baltz, A

    V. Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y. Tserkovnyak, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015005 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    Flebus, D

    B. Flebus, D. Grundler, B. Rana, Y. C. Otani, I. Bar- sukov, A. Barman, G. Gubbiotti, P. Landeros, J. Aker- man, U. Ebels, P. Pirro, V. E. Demidov, K. Schultheiss, G. Csaba, Q. Wang, F. Ciubotaru, D. E. Nikonov, P. Che, R. Hertel, T. Ono, D. Afanasiev, J. Mentink, T. Rasing, B...

    2024

  11. [19]

    Seradjeh, J

    B. Seradjeh, J. E. Moore, and M. Franz, Exciton con- densation and charge fractionalization in a topological insulator film, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 066402 (2009)

    2009

  12. [20]

    Das Sarma, M

    S. Das Sarma, M. Freedman, and C. Nayak, Topologi- cally protected qubits from a possible non-abelian frac- tional quantum Hall state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 166802 (2005)

    2005

  13. [21]

    Nayak, S

    C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Non-abelian anyons and topologi- cal quantum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1083 (2008)

    2008

  14. [22]

    Dal Din, O

    A. Dal Din, O. J. Amin, P. Wadley, and K. W. Ed- monds, Antiferromagnetic spintronics and beyond, npj Spintronics 2, 25 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    V. V. Kruglyak, S. O. Demokritov, and D. Grundler, Magnonics, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 43, 264001 (2010)

    2010

  16. [24]

    A. Mook, J. Henk, and I. Mertig, Magnon Hall effect and topology in Kagome lattices: A theoretical investigation, Phys. Rev. B 89, 134409 (2014)

    2014

  17. [25]

    Stern and N

    A. Stern and N. H. Lindner, Topological quantum com- 8 putation – from basic concepts to first experiments, Sci- ence 339, 1179 (2013)

    2013

  18. [26]

    S. A. Owerre, Topological thermal Hall effect in frus- trated Kagome antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 95, 014422 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    H. Doki, M. Akazawa, H.-Y. Lee, J. H. Han, K. Sugii, M. Shimozawa, N. Kawashima, M. Oda, H. Yoshida, and M. Yamashita, Spin thermal Hall conductivity of a Kagome antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 097203 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    A. Mook, J. Henk, and I. Mertig, Spin dynamics simula- tions of topological magnon insulators: From transverse current correlation functions to the family of magnon Hall effects, Phys. Rev. B 94, 174444 (2016)

    2016

  21. [29]

    A. Mook, J. Henk, and I. Mertig, Thermal Hall ef- fect in noncollinear coplanar insulating antiferromag- nets, Phys. Rev. B 99, 014427 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    A. A. Kovalev and V. Zyuzin, Spin torque and Nernst ef- fects in Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 93, 161106 (2016)

    2016

  23. [31]

    Laurell and G

    P. Laurell and G. A. Fiete, Magnon thermal Hall ef- fect in Kagome antiferromagnets with Dzyaloshinskii- Moriya interactions, Phys. Rev. B 98, 094419 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    Cheng, S

    R. Cheng, S. Okamoto, and D. Xiao, Spin Nernst effect of magnons in collinear antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 217202 (2016)

    2016

  25. [33]

    Shiomi, R

    Y. Shiomi, R. Takashima, and E. Saitoh, Experimental evidence consistent with a magnon Nernst effect in the antiferromagnetic insulator MnPS 3, Phys. Rev. B 96, 134425 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    V. A. Zyuzin and A. A. Kovalev, Magnon spin Nernst effect in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 217203 (2016)

    2016

  27. [35]

    V. A. Zyuzin and A. A. Kovalev, Spin Hall and Nernst effects of Weyl magnons, Phys. Rev. B 97, 174407 (2018)

    2018

  28. [36]

    A. Mook, R. R. Neumann, J. Henk, and I. Mertig, Spin Seebeck and spin Nernst effects of magnons in noncollinear antiferromagnetic insulators, Phys. Rev. B 100, 100401 (2019)

    2019

  29. [37]

    Zhang, S

    Y. Zhang, S. Okamoto, and D. Xiao, Spin-Nernst ef- fect in the paramagnetic regime of an antiferromagnetic insulator, Phys. Rev. B 98, 035424 (2018)

    2018

  30. [38]

    J. Xiao, G. E. W. Bauer, K.-C. Uchida, E. Saitoh, and S. Maekawa, Theory of magnon-driven spin Seebeck ef- fect, Phys. Rev. B 81, 214418 (2010)

    2010

  31. [39]

    Uchida, J

    K. Uchida, J. Xiao, H. Adachi, J. Ohe, S. Takahashi, J. Ieda, T. Ota, Y. Kajiwara, H. Umezawa, H. Kawai, G. E. W. Bauer, S. Maekawa, and E. Saitoh, Spin See- beck insulator, Nat. Mater. 9, 894 (2010)

    2010

  32. [40]

    B. Li, S. Sandhoefner, and A. A. Kovalev, Intrinsic spin Nernst effect of magnons in a noncollinear antiferromag- net, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013079 (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    S. M. Wu, W. Zhang, K. C. Amit, P. Borisov, J. E. Pearson, J. S. Jiang, D. Lederman, A. Hoffmann, and A. Bhattacharya, Antiferromagnetic spin Seebeck effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 097204 (2016)

    2016

  34. [42]

    B. Li, A. Mook, A. Raeliarijaona, and A. A. Kovalev, Magnonic analog of the Edelstein effect in antiferromag- netic insulators, Phys. Rev. B 101, 024427 (2020)

    2020

  35. [43]

    S. M. Rezende, R. L. Rodr ´ ıguez-Su´ arez, and A. Azevedo, Theory of the spin Seebeck effect in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 93, 014425 (2016)

    2016

  36. [44]

    Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics, J

    I. Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics, J. Phys. Chem. Solid. 4, 241 (1958)

    1958

  37. [45]

    Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Phys

    T. Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. 120, 91 (1960)

    1960

  38. [46]

    G. Go, D. An, H.-W. Lee, and S. K. Kim, Magnon or- bital Nernst effect in honeycomb antiferromagnets with- out spin-orbit coupling, Nano. Lett. 24, 5968 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    S. S. Pershoguba, S. Banerjee, J. C. Lashley, J. Park, H. ˚Agren, G. Aeppli, and A. V. Balatsky, Dirac magnons in honeycomb ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. X 8, 011010 (2018)

    2018

  40. [48]

    Chen, J.-H

    L. Chen, J.-H. Chung, B. Gao, T. Chen, M. B. Stone, A. I. Kolesnikov, Q. Huang, and P. Dai, Topological spin excitations in honeycomb ferromagnet CrI 3, Phys. Rev. X 8, 041028 (2018)

    2018

  41. [49]

    Fransson, A

    J. Fransson, A. M. Black-Schaffer, and A. V. Bal- atsky, Magnon Dirac materials, Phys. Rev. B94, 075401 (2016)

    2016

  42. [50]

    Varshney, R

    H. Varshney, R. Mukherjee, A. Kundu, and A. Agarwal, Intrinsic nonlinear thermal Hall transport of magnons: A quantum kinetic theory approach, Phys. Rev. B 108, 165412 (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    Saleem, U

    L. Saleem, U. Schwingenschl¨ ogl, and A. Manchon, Keldysh theory of thermal transport in multiband Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. B 109, 134415 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    Chen, J.-H

    L. Chen, J.-H. Chung, M. B. Stone, A. I. Kolesnikov, B. Winn, V. O. Garlea, D. L. Abernathy, B. Gao, M. Augustin, E. J. G. Santos, and P. Dai, Magnetic field effect on topological spin excitations in CrI3, Phys. Rev. X 11, 031047 (2021)

    2021

  45. [53]

    Sourounis and A

    K. Sourounis and A. Manchon, Impact of magnon in- teractions on transport in honeycomb antiferromagnets, arXiv: 2402.14572 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Hirschberger, R

    M. Hirschberger, R. Chisnell, Y. S. Lee, and N. P. Ong, Thermal Hall effect of spin excitations in a Kagome magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 106603 (2015)

    2015

  47. [55]

    C. Xu, H. Zhang, C. Carnahan, P. Zhang, D. Xiao, and X. Ke, Thermal Hall effect in the van der Waals ferro- magnet CrI3, Phys. Rev. B 109, 094415 (2024)

    2024

  48. [56]

    Yarmohammadi, Magnon heat capacity and mag- netic susceptibility of the spin Lieb lattice, J

    M. Yarmohammadi, Magnon heat capacity and mag- netic susceptibility of the spin Lieb lattice, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 417, 208 (2016)

    2016

  49. [57]

    F. Zhuo, J. Kang, Z. Cheng, and A. Manchon, Topolog- ical band engineering and tunable thermal Hall effect in trimerized Lieb lattice ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 109, 054412 (2024)

    2024

  50. [58]

    X. Cao, K. Chen, and D. He, Magnon Hall effect on the Lieb lattice, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 27, 166003 (2015)

    2015

  51. [59]

    Brekke, A

    B. Brekke, A. Brataas, and A. Sudbø, Two-dimensional altermagnets: Superconductivity in a minimal micro- scopic model, Phys. Rev. B 108, 224421 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    Q. Cui, B. Zeng, P. Cui, T. Yu, and H. Yang, Efficient spin Seebeck and spin Nernst effects of magnons in al- termagnets, Phys. Rev. B 108, L180401 (2023). 9

    2023

  53. [61]

    K.-S. Kim, K. H. Lee, S. B. Chung, and J.-G. Park, Magnon topology and thermal Hall effect in trimerized triangular lattice antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 100, 064412 (2019)

    2019

  54. [62]

    Hoyer, R

    R. Hoyer, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, K.-H. Ahn, L. ˇSmejkal, and A. Mook, Spontaneous crystal thermal Hall effect in insulating altermagnets, arXiv: 2405.05090 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Sutherland, Localization of electronic wave functions due to local topology, Phys

    B. Sutherland, Localization of electronic wave functions due to local topology, Phys. Rev. B 34, 5208 (1986)

    1986

  56. [64]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. Marmodoro, K.-H. Ahn, R. Gonz´ alez- Hern´ andez, I. Turek, S. Mankovsky, H. Ebert, S. W. D’Souza, O. ˇSipr, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Chiral magnons in altermagnetic RuO 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 256703 (2023)

    2023

  57. [65]

    Andrijauskas, E

    T. Andrijauskas, E. Anisimovas, M. Raˇ ci¯ unas, A. Mekys, V. Kudriaˇ sov, I. B. Spielman, and G. Juzeli¯ unas, Three-level Haldane-like model on a dice optical lattice, Phys. Rev. A 92, 033617 (2015)

    2015

  58. [66]

    J. D. Malcolm and E. J. Nicol, Frequency-dependent polarizability, plasmons, and screening in the two- dimensional pseudospin-1 dice lattice, Phys. Rev. B 93, 165433 (2016)

    2016

  59. [67]

    M¨ oller and N

    G. M¨ oller and N. R. Cooper, Correlated phases of bosons in the flat lowest band of the dice lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 045306 (2012)

    2012

  60. [68]

    A. Fang, Z. Q. Zhang, S. G. Louie, and C. T. Chan, Klein tunneling and supercollimation of pseudospin-1 electromagnetic waves, Phys. Rev. B 93, 035422 (2016)

    2016

  61. [69]

    Khomeriki and S

    R. Khomeriki and S. Flach, Landau-Zener Bloch oscil- lations with perturbed flat bands, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 245301 (2016)

    2016

  62. [70]

    D. F. Urban, D. Bercioux, M. Wimmer, and W. H¨ ausler, Barrier transmission of Dirac-like pseudospin-one parti- cles, Phys. Rev. B 84, 115136 (2011)

    2011

  63. [71]

    Illes and E

    E. Illes and E. J. Nicol, Klein tunneling in the α-T3 model, Phys. Rev. B 95, 235432 (2017)

    2017

  64. [72]

    M. A. Mojarro, V. G. Ibarra-Sierra, J. C. Sandoval- Santana, R. Carrillo-Bastos, and G. G. Naumis, Elec- tron transitions for Dirac Hamiltonians with flat bands under electromagnetic radiation: Application to the α- T3 graphene model, Phys. Rev. B 101, 165305 (2020)

    2020

  65. [73]

    Betancur-Ocampo, G

    Y. Betancur-Ocampo, G. Cordourier-Maruri, V. Gupta, and R. de Coss, Super-Klein tunneling of massive pseudospin-one particles, Phys. Rev. B 96, 024304 (2017)

    2017

  66. [74]

    Kim and K

    S. Kim and K. Kim, Anderson localization of two- dimensional massless pseudospin-1 Dirac particles in a correlated random one-dimensional scalar potential, Phys. Rev. B 100, 104201 (2019)

    2019

  67. [75]

    S. K. F. Islam and P. Dutta, Valley-polarized magneto- conductivity and particle-hole symmetry breaking in a periodically modulated α-T3 lattice, Phys. Rev. B 96, 045418 (2017)

    2017

  68. [76]

    A. Fang, Z. Q. Zhang, S. G. Louie, and C. T. Chan, Anomalous Anderson localization behaviors in disor- dered pseudospin systems, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, 4087 (2017)

    2017

  69. [77]

    Filusch, A

    A. Filusch, A. R. Bishop, A. Saxena, G. Wellein, and H. Fehske, Valley filtering in strain-induced α-T3 quan- tum dots, Phys. Rev. B 103, 165114 (2021)

    2021

  70. [78]

    Z. P. Niu and S. J. Wang, Valley polarized transport and negative differential resistance in an irradiated α- T3 lattice, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 55, 255303 (2022)

    2022

  71. [79]

    Huang, A

    D. Huang, A. Iurov, H.-Y. Xu, Y.-C. Lai, and G. Gumbs, Interplay of Lorentz-Berry forces in position- momentum spaces for valley-dependent impurity scat- tering in α-T3 lattices, Phys. Rev. B 99, 245412 (2019)

    2019

  72. [80]

    D. O. Oriekhov and V. P. Gusynin, RKKY interaction in a doped pseudospin-1 fermion system at finite tem- perature, Phys. Rev. B 101, 235162 (2020)

    2020

  73. [81]

    Roslyak, G

    O. Roslyak, G. Gumbs, A. Balassis, and H. Elsayed, Effect of magnetic field and chemical potential on the RKKY interaction in the α-T3 lattice, Phys. Rev. B 103, 075418 (2021)

    2021

  74. [82]

    Biswas and T

    T. Biswas and T. K. Ghosh, Dynamics of a quasiparti- cle in α-T3 model: Role of pseudospin polarization and transverse magnetic field on zitterbewegung, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 30, 075301 (2018)

    2018

  75. [83]

    Y.-R. Chen, Y. Xu, J. Wang, J.-F. Liu, and Z. Ma, Enhanced magneto-optical response due to the flat band in nanoribbons made from the α-T3 lattice, Phys. Rev. B 99, 045420 (2019)

    2019

  76. [84]

    L. Chen, J. Zuber, Z. Ma, and C. Zhang, Nonlinear optical response of the α-T3 model due to the nontriv- ial topology of the band dispersion, Phys. Rev. B 100, 035440 (2019)

    2019

  77. [85]

    Illes, J

    E. Illes, J. P. Carbotte, and E. J. Nicol, Hall quanti- zation and optical conductivity evolution with variable Berry phase in the α-T3 model, Phys. Rev. B 92, 245410 (2015)

    2015

  78. [86]

    Duan, Seebeck and Nernst effects of pseudospin-1 fermions in the α-T3 model under magnetic fields, Phys

    W. Duan, Seebeck and Nernst effects of pseudospin-1 fermions in the α-T3 model under magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. B 108, 155428 (2023)

    2023

  79. [87]

    Parui, S

    P. Parui, S. Ghosh, and B. L. Chittari, Topological prop- erties of nearly flat bands in bilayer α-T3 lattice, Phys. Rev. B 109, 165118 (2024)

    2024

  80. [88]

    Mohanta, R

    N. Mohanta, R. Soni, S. Okamoto, and E. Dagotto, Ma- jorana corner states on the dice lattice, Commun. Phys. 6, 240 (2023)

    2023

  81. [89]

    J. D. Malcolm and E. J. Nicol, Magneto-optics of mass- less Kane fermions: Role of the flat band and unusual Berry phase, Phys. Rev. B 92, 035118 (2015)

    2015

  82. [90]

    Wang and Y

    F. Wang and Y. Ran, Nearly flat band with Chern num- ber C = 2 on the dice lattice, Phys. Rev. B 84, 241103 (2011)

    2011

  83. [91]

    Orlita, D

    M. Orlita, D. M. Basko, M. S. Zholudev, F. Teppe, W. Knap, V. I. Gavrilenko, N. N. Mikhailov, S. A. Dvoretskii, P. Neugebauer, C. Faugeras, A.-L. Barra, G. Martinez, and M. Potemski, Observation of three- dimensional massless Kane fermions in a zinc-blende crystal, Nat. Phys. ...

    2014

  84. [92]

    Petit, Numerical simulations and magnetism, Collec- tion SFN 12, 105 (2011)

    S. Petit, Numerical simulations and magnetism, Collec- tion SFN 12, 105 (2011)

    2011

  85. [93]

    Toth and B

    S. Toth and B. Lake, Linear spin wave theory for single- Q incommensurate magnetic structures, J. Phys.: Con- dens. Matter 27, 166002 (2015)

    2015

  86. [94]

    Lu, J.-L

    Y.-S. Lu, J.-L. Li, and C.-T. Wu, Topological phase transitions of Dirac magnons in honeycomb ferromag- nets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 217202 (2021)

    2021

  87. [95]

    M. E. Zhitomirsky and A. L. Chernyshev, Colloquium: Spontaneous magnon decays, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 219 (2013)

    2013

  88. [96]

    L. D. Landau and E. Lifshitz, On the theory of the dis- persion of magnetic permeability in ferromagnetic bod- ies, Phys. Z. Sowjet. 8, 153 (1935)

    1935

  89. [97]

    Holstein and H

    T. Holstein and H. Primakoff, Field dependence of the intrinsic domain magnetization of a ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. 58, 1098 (1940)

    1940

  90. [98]

    G. P. M¨ uller, M. Hoffmann, C. Dißelkamp, D. Sch¨ urhoff, 10 S. Mavros, M. Sallermann, N. S. Kiselev, H. J´ onsson, and S. Bl¨ ugel, Spirit: Multifunctional framework for atomistic spin simulations, Phys. Rev. B 99, 224414 (2019)

    2019

  91. [99]

    J. E. Moore, The birth of topological insulators, Nature 464, 194 (2010)

    2010

  92. [100]

    A non- trivial topology of Bloch states thus is characterized by a non-zero Chern number

    (which defines a non-zero Berry curvature). A non- trivial topology of Bloch states thus is characterized by a non-zero Chern number. This concept of topology is not exclusive to electrons but can also be applied to magnon Bloch states [101–104]. In our case, the topology is d...

  93. [101]

    T. L. Gilbert, A phenomenological theory of damping in ferromagnetic materials, IEEE Trans. Magn.40, 3443 (2004)

    2004

  94. [102]

    X. S. Wang and X. R. Wang, Topological magnonics, J. Appl. Phys. 129, 151101 (2021)

    2021

  95. [103]

    M. V. Berry, Quantal phase factors accompanying adi- abatic changes, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 392, 45 (1984)

    1984

  96. [104]

    S. A. Owerre, A first theoretical realization of honey- comb topological magnon insulator, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 28, 386001 (2016)

    2016

  97. [105]

    Onose, T

    Y. Onose, T. Ideue, H. Katsura, Y. Shiomi, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura, Observation of the magnon Hall effect, Science 329, 297 (2010)

    2010

  98. [106]

    P. A. McClarty, Topological magnons: A review, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 13, 171 (2022)

    2022

  99. [107]

    F. Zhuo, J. Kang, A. Manchon, and Z. Cheng, Topo- logical phases in magnonics, Adv. Phys. Res. in press, 2300054 (2024)

    2024

  100. [108]

    Paschen and Q

    S. Paschen and Q. Si, Quantum phases driven by strong correlations, Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 9 (2021)

    2021

  101. [109]

    Imamura, S

    K. Imamura, S. Suetsugu, Y. Mizukami, Y. Yoshida, K. Hashimoto, K. Ohtsuka, Y. Kasahara, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, P. Noh, J. Nasu, E.-G. Moon, Y. Matsuda, and T. Shibauchi, Majorana-fermion origin of the planar thermal Hall effect in the Kitaev magnet α-RuCl3, Sci. Adv. 10, eadk3...

    2024

  102. [110]

    Seemann, D

    M. Seemann, D. K¨ odderitzsch, S. Wimmer, and H. Ebert, Symmetry-imposed shape of linear response tensors, Phys. Rev. B 92, 155138 (2015)

    2015

  103. [111]

    Doleˇ zal, M

    P. Doleˇ zal, M. Kratochv ´ ılov´ a, V. Hol´ y, P.ˇCerm´ ak, V. Sechovsk´ y, M. Duˇ sek, M. M ´ ıˇ sek, T. Chakraborty, Y. Noda, S. Son, and J.-G. Park, Crystal structures and phase transitions of the van der Waals ferromagnet VI3, Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 121401 (2019)

    2019

  104. [112]

    S. D. Huber and E. Altman, Bose condensation in flat bands, Phys. Rev. B 82, 184502 (2010)

    2010

  105. [113]

    Another possibility is a trilayer structure of cubic ferromagnets, such as iron ox- ides [115], grown along the (111) direction

    or Fe3GeTe2 [114], arranged in a way that a lattice site of one monolayer aligns with the center of the hon- eycomb of the other monolayer. Another possibility is a trilayer structure of cubic ferromagnets, such as iron ox- ides [115], grown along the (111) direction. Nanomagn...

  106. [114]

    Huang, G

    B. Huang, G. Clark, E. Navarro-Moratalla, D. R. Klein, R. Cheng, K. L. Seyler, D. Zhong, E. Schmidgall, M. A. McGuire, D. H. Cobden, W. Yao, D. Xiao, P. Jarillo- Herrero, and X. Xu, Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit, Nature 5...

    2017

  107. [115]

    Carteaux, F

    V. Carteaux, F. Moussa, and M. Spiesser, 2D Ising- like ferromagnetic behaviour for the Lamellar Cr2Si2Te6 compound: A neutron scattering investigation, EPL 29, 251 (1995)

    1995

  108. [116]

    G. T. Lin, H. L. Zhuang, X. Luo, B. J. Liu, F. C. Chen, J. Yan, Y. Sun, J. Zhou, W. J. Lu, P. Tong, Z. G. Sheng, Z. Qu, W. H. Song, X. B. Zhu, and Y. P. Sun, Tricritical behavior of the two-dimensional intrinsically ferromagnetic semiconductor CrGeTe 3, Phys. Rev. B 95, 245212 (2017)

    2017

  109. [117]

    Z. Fei, B. Huang, P. Malinowski, W. Wang, T. Song, J. Sanchez, W. Yao, D. Xiao, X. Zhu, A. F. May, W. Wu, D. H. Cobden, J.-H. Chu, and X. Xu, Two-dimensional itinerant ferromagnetism in atomically thin Fe 3GeTe2, Nat. Mater. 17, 778 (2018)

    2018

  110. [118]

    Hayashi, T

    N. Hayashi, T. Yamamoto, H. Kageyama, M. Nishi, Y. Watanabe, T. Kawakami, Y. Matsushita, A. Fuji- mori, and M. Takano, BaFeO 3: A ferromagnetic iron oxide, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 12547 (2011)

    2011

  111. [119]

    Rougemaille, F

    N. Rougemaille, F. Montaigne, B. Canals, A. Dulu- ard, D. Lacour, M. Hehn, R. Belkhou, O. Fruchart, S. El Moussaoui, A. Bendounan, and F. Maccherozzi, Artificial Kagome arrays of nanomagnets: A frozen dipo- lar spin ice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 057209 (2011)

    2011

  112. [120]

    Canals, I.-A

    B. Canals, I.-A. Chioar, V.-D. Nguyen, M. Hehn, D. La- cour, F. Montaigne, A. Locatelli, T. O. Mente¸ s, B. S. Burgos, and N. Rougemaille, Fragmentation of mag- netism in artificial Kagome dipolar spin ice, Nat. Com- mun. 7, 11446 (2016)

    2016

  113. [121]

    N. Leo, S. Holenstein, D. Schildknecht, O. Sendetskyi, H. Luetkens, P. M. Derlet, V. Scagnoli, D. Lan¸ con, J. R. L. Mardegan, T. Prokscha, A. Suter, Z. Salman, S. Lee, and L. J. Heyderman, Collective magnetism in an artificial 2D XY spin system, Nat. Commun. 9, 2850 (2018)

    2018

  114. [122]

    S. H. Skjærvø, C. H. Marrows, R. L. Stamps, and L. J. Heyderman, Advances in artificial spin ice, Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 13 (2020)

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.