Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 49 references

Probing triple-gauge couplings in anomalous gauge theories at hadron and lepton colliders

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A gauge-anomalous Z' with muonic couplings could show up at the next colliders as loop-induced diboson signals.

desk verdict Solid collider sensitivity study for a muonic U(1)' model with a robust HL-LHC null result, but the quoted future-collider reaches depend on an unconstrained WZW counterterm choice and should be framed as scheme-dependent benchmarks. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.04132 v2 pith:PI5N54CF submitted 2025-01-07 hep-ph hep-ex

Anibal D. Medina , Nicolás I. Mileo , Alejandro Szynkman , Santiago A. Tanco , Carlos E. M. Wagner , Gabriel Zapata This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-ex
keywords anomaloustriple-gaugecouplingsmuonicU(1)'Z'bosonWess-Zumino-Wittentermeffectivefieldtheorycolliderphenomenologyneutrinotridentfuturecolliders
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to show that the loop-induced triple-gauge couplings of a massive $Z'$ boson, forced on the theory by mixed gauge anomalies in a muonic $U(1)'_\mu$ extension of the Standard Model, can be observed at proposed colliders even though they are invisible at the HL-LHC. Because an anomalous gauge theory is only an effective theory, the anomalous vertices are non-decoupling remnants that carry information about the UV completion. The paper computes these $Z'ZZ$, $Z'Z\gamma$ and $Z'\gamma\gamma$ vertices in the covariant regularization scheme, implements them in event generation, and evaluates signal versus irreducible Standard Model background at four facilities. It finds that a 100 TeV $pp$ collider can gather evidence for $m_{Z'}\in[150,800]$ GeV and discovery in $[230,330]$ GeV, while CLIC at $\sqrt{s}=3$ TeV can reach $5\sigma$ discovery for $m_{Z'}\in[125,225]$ GeV; a resonant muon collider covers complementary masses. If true, a class of anomalous effective theories usually dismissed as sick would leave observable traces at the next generation of colliders.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the anomalous triple-gauge vertex $Z'VV$, written in the Rosenberg parametrization with six Lorentz form factors. The convergent form factors $A_3,\ldots,A_6$ come from one-loop triangle integrals over the muon and the muon neutrino, while the divergent coefficients $\tilde{A}_1$ and $\tilde{A}_2$ are fixed by imposing the Standard Model Ward identities, which is the covariant anomaly prescription and corresponds to setting the WZW counterterms to zero. The longitudinal component of the $Z'$ propagator is what feels the anomaly and produces the energy-growing, eventually constant signal cross sections; the model is implemented by exporting the tree-level $Z'$ couplings and then inserting the anomalous vertices with their momentum-dependent form factors so that event generation evaluates them on the fly.

What would settle it

Reconstruct the $\mu^+\mu^-jj$ or $\mu^+\mu^-\gamma$ final state at CLIC with $5~\mathrm{ab}^{-1}$; for $m_{Z'}=200$ GeV the covariant-scheme model predicts about five signal events after cuts, so a measured yield consistent with background alone would rule out the predicted anomalous $Z'Z$ vertex.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the claim is that the mixed gauge anomaly of a $U(1)'_\mu$ under which only second-generation leptons are axially charged generates calculable, loop-suppressed triple-gauge couplings $Z'ZZ$, $Z'Z\gamma$ and $Z'\gamma\gamma$, and that choosing the covariant regularization scheme, together with the Wess-Zumino consistency conditions, fixes the WZW counterterms so that all Standard Model Ward identities hold and the anomaly is concentrated in the $Z'$ vertex. The resulting vertices grow with energy through the longitudinal polarization of the $Z'$, and when the $Z'$--muon coupling is set to the largest value allowed by neutrino trident data, the cross sections become observable: the HL-LHC cannot see them, the 100 TeV $pp$ collider at $20~\mathrm{ab}^{-1}$ can reach evidence between 150 and 800 GeV and discovery between about 230 and 330 GeV, a muon collider tuned to the $Z'$ resonance can exclude $m_{Z'}\in[280,850]$ GeV and reach evidence in $[380,700]$ GeV, and CLIC at $\sqrt{s}=3$ TeV with $5~\mathrm{ab}^{-1}$ can discover the coupling for $m_{Z'}\in[125,225]$ GeV while providing evidence up to about 400 GeV.

Load-bearing premise

The projected reaches assume that only irreducible Standard Model backgrounds contribute and that the covariant regularization scheme gives the exact anomalous vertices; if either fails, the significances and mass windows shrink.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A null result at the HL-LHC is expected and does not disfavor the model; the loop-suppressed signals are too small relative to SM backgrounds.
  • If the 100 TeV $pp$ collider runs at $20~\mathrm{ab}^{-1}$, a $Z'\gamma$ resonance search can establish evidence up to $m_{Z'}\simeq 800$ GeV and discovery near $m_{Z'}\simeq 300$ GeV.
  • CLIC's signal cross section approaches a constant at high energy while the SM background falls, which is what makes $5\sigma$ discovery possible for light $Z'$ masses.
  • The resonant muon collider probes a complementary, heavier mass window, and its resonant signal rate is independent of the $Z'$--muon coupling.
  • Observation of these anomalous couplings would indirectly reveal the presence of the spectator fermions required to render the full UV theory anomaly-free.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper fixes $g_\mu$ to the neutrino-trident bound for every mass; a natural extension is to recast each luminosity curve as an exclusion or discovery bound in the $(m_{Z'},g_\mu)$ plane, showing how much coupling below the bound can still be probed.
  • The same covariant-regularized vertex construction applies to electron- or tau-philic $U(1)'$ models, but the collider story changes: at $e^+e^-$ machines the initial-state electrons would be neutral under such a $Z'$, removing the tree-level $t$-channel contamination that dominates muon-collider production.
  • Because the $e^+e^-$ signal cross section approaches a constant at high energy, a future higher-energy collider could measure the energy dependence of $Z'V$ production and distinguish the anomalous growth from the $1/s$ falloff expected in a unitary, UV-complete theory.
  • These searches are also probes of the WZW-scheme ambiguity: if nature realized the consistent-anomaly scheme rather than the covariant one, the reach windows and the high-energy growth pattern would differ, so a measured cross-section shape could identify the regularization.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the low-energy EFT of a muonic U(1)'_mu gauge symmetry with second-generation leptons axially charged, focusing on loop-induced anomalous triple-gauge couplings Z'VV~ where V,V~ are SM electroweak bosons. The vertices are derived in Appendix A in the covariant regularization scheme, implemented in a MadGraph UFO model with form factors checked against LoopTools, and used to estimate discovery reaches at the HL-LHC, a 100 TeV pp collider, a resonant muon collider, and CLIC at sqrt(s)=3 TeV. With g_mu saturating the neutrino trident bound, the paper finds that the HL-LHC cannot probe these couplings, while the 100 TeV collider could reach evidence for m_Z' in [150,800] GeV and discovery in [230,330] GeV at 20/ab, and CLIC could reach 5-sigma discovery for m_Z' in [125,225] GeV at 5/ab. The paper explicitly treats the WZW counterterm freedom by choosing the covariant scheme and limits all analyses to irreducible backgrounds.

Significance. If the central predictions are robust, the paper provides a concrete and falsifiable target: loop-induced anomalous triple-gauge couplings could be observed at a 100 TeV hadron collider or at CLIC even though they are out of reach of the HL-LHC. The strengths of the paper are that the vertex derivation in Appendix A is internally consistent, the numerical amplitudes are checked against LoopTools, the signal predictions are forward predictions with no parameter fitted to the target signals, and the authors explicitly evaluate SM interference in the HL-LHC Z'gamma channel. The main weakness is that the size of the anomalous vertices depends on the WZW counterterm convention, and the projections rely on optimistic background assumptions; these limitations are acknowledged in the text but are load-bearing for the quoted mass windows and should be addressed.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix A, Eqs. (16)-(20); Section 2, Eq. (9)] The manuscript correctly states that the WZW coefficients are in one-to-one correspondence with a momentum shift in the triangle loop (Appendix A, Eqs. (16)-(20)), and then fixes the covariant scheme w=-z=1 to set the WZW counterterms to zero. This choice preserves the SM Ward identities, but it does not by itself fix the physical anomalous vertex: a different momentum shift, together with the corresponding WZW counterterms, is an equally valid EFT description of the same low-energy content and can lead to different form factors tilde-A1 and tilde-A2. Since the cross sections used for the reach estimates, e.g. Eqs. (11)-(15) and the pp -> Z'gamma signal in Section 3.2, are proportional to (tilde-A1 - tilde-A2)^2, the quoted mass windows (CLIC discovery [125,225] GeV, 100 TeV discovery [230,330] GeV) are not robust predictions of the EFT unless the WZW coefficient is fixed by a concrete UV completion or by an additional physical criterion. The paper acknowledges the freedom but treats the covariant choice as definitive; this is a load-bearing assumption and should be either justified from a spectator sector or folded into the projections as an explicit parameter.
  2. [Section 3.2; Section 3.1.1] The 100 TeV pp -> Z'gamma -> mu+mu-gamma analysis omits the signal-background interference, although the same final state at the HL-LHC was found to have destructive interference of similar magnitude to the signal (Section 3.1.1) and the Z'Z channel showed order-10% interference (Section 3.1.2). The kinematics at the higher pT thresholds used for the 100 TeV scan (pTgamma ~ 300-1700 GeV) differ from the HL-LHC analysis, but without a dedicated evaluation one cannot exclude a sizable reduction of the signal; the evidence and discovery ranges quoted in Section 3.2 are therefore optimistic. Please compute the interference for the 100 TeV benchmarks or provide a quantitative argument for its smallness.
  3. [Sections 2, 3.2, 4.3; Tables 3, 6, 7] All significances are computed as S/sqrt(B) with only irreducible backgrounds and no systematic uncertainty. The paper explicitly describes this as a first approximation, but it remains load-bearing for the central claims: in the 100 TeV channel the post-cut S/B is about 0.68 (Table 3), so a 10-20% background normalization uncertainty would shift the discovery significance substantially; in the CLIC channels S/B is larger, but the final backgrounds are O(1-10) events after cuts (Tables 6-7), so the Poisson-limited significance also requires care. Please add a scan over a background normalization systematic, or at least state the systematic level at which each claimed discovery window closes.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Section 5] The word 'complimentary' should be 'complementary' in the abstract and in the conclusion.
  2. [Appendix A, text above Eq. (16) and Eq. (28)] The text above Eq. (16) contains a duplicated article ('the the resulting Ward identities'), and Eq. (28) has 'I3(p, q.mf)' with a period instead of a comma.
  3. [References, [6]] Reference [6] is incomplete: it gives the collaboration and title but lacks a journal reference, arXiv identifier, or DOI.
  4. [Table 4 caption] The relative acceptances in Table 4 are presented without stating explicitly that they are computed with respect to the initial event numbers; please clarify the normalization.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: predicted reaches are forward calculations from loop-computed anomalous vertices with the coupling fixed by the external neutrino-trident bound; the acknowledged WZW scheme freedom is model dependence, not circular re-use of the signal.

full rationale

The central chain is: take the U(1)'_mu EFT (Eq. (1)), compute the anomalous Z'VV vertices from triangle loops with the EW Ward identities imposed (Eqs. (7)-(8); explicit form factors in Eqs. (21)-(37)), fix g_mu to the largest value allowed by neutrino trident data (Eq. (10), citing CCFR/DUNE), and then simulate signal and irreducible backgrounds in MadGraph to derive luminosities and mass reaches. No parameter is fitted to the HL-LHC, 100 TeV, CLIC, or muon-collider signal observables that are then 'predicted'; the collider reach is a genuine forward implication of the vertices and the trident-saturated coupling. The self-citation to the authors' prior work [14] supplies the model and anomaly-cancellation discussion, but the covariant-scheme Ward identity is independent of the spectator content (Eq. (20)), so [14] is not load-bearing for the reach claims. The WZW/momentum-shift freedom highlighted in footnote 3 and Appendix A is explicitly acknowledged; choosing the covariant scheme (w=-z=1) is a stated convention for defining the EFT vertices, and the paper does not present that choice as a derived prediction. This is a standard scheme-dependence/correctness caveat, not a reduction of the output to the input. The main caveats (irreducible backgrounds only, pT-gamma cut optimization) are assumptions about detector and background modeling, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The only tunable parameter entering the signal is g_mu, which is fixed by the external neutrino trident bound. The main model dependence is the choice of covariant regularization, which fixes the WZW counterterms; this is a physical assumption about the UV completion and is not tested in the paper.

free parameters (1)
  • g_mu (Z'-muon axial coupling) = g_mu^max = sqrt(0.3) * m_Z'/v, e.g., 0.445 for m_Z' = 200 GeV
    Set to the largest value allowed by neutrino trident constraints to maximize signal; the projected reach is an optimistic upper bound.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The U(1)'_mu EFT is valid up to a cutoff Λ ≈ 64π^3 m_Z'/(3 g_mu g_SM^2) ≈ 800 TeV, and all simulated energies are below this scale.
    Used to justify the EFT treatment; introduced in Section 2.
  • ad hoc to paper The covariant regularization scheme fixes the WZW counterterms to zero, so the anomalous Z'VV~ vertices are fully determined by requiring the SM Ward identities to hold.
    Adopted to transfer all anomalies to the Z' Ward identity; a different scheme (consistent anomaly) would add WZW terms and change the couplings. See Section 2 and Appendix A.
  • domain assumption There is no tree-level kinetic mixing between the Z' and the SM gauge bosons.
    Assumed in Eq. (1); kinetic mixing could alter production and decays.
  • domain assumption The muon mass can be generated by a higher-dimensional operator after U(1)'_mu breaking, without altering the low-energy EFT.
    Discussed in Section 2 and reference [14]; required for consistency with the SM muon Yukawa.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Probing triple-gauge couplings in anomalous gauge theories at hadron and lepton colliders." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PI5N54CF

@misc{pith2026250104132,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Probing triple-gauge couplings in anomalous gauge theories at hadron and lepton colliders},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PI5N54CF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.04132}
}
abstract

Gauge anomalous quantum field theories are inconsistent as full UV theories since they lead to the breaking of Lorentz invariance or Unitarity, as well as non-renormalizability. It is well known, however, that they can be interpreted as effective field theories (EFT) with a cut-off. The latter cannot be made arbitrarily large and it is related to the energy scale at which additional fermions with suitable gauge charges enter, rendering the full model anomaly-free. A nondecoupling effect that remains in the EFT is the appearance of anomalous loop-induced triple-gauge couplings, encapsulating information from the full UV theory. In this work we take as an example an Abelian gauge symmetry $U(1)'_\mu$ under which $2^{nd}$-generation leptons are axially charged, leading to an EFT that consists of the Standard Model (SM) with an additional massive $Z'$ gauge boson. As a consequence, there are triple gauge couplings involving the $Z'$ and Electroweak SM gauge bosons via mixed gauge anomalies. We study the possibility of probing these loop suppressed anomalous couplings at hadron and lepton colliders, with $Z'$-lepton couplings allowed by current experimental bounds, finding that due to the large SM backgrounds and small signal, the HL-LHC is incapable of this task. The 100 TeV $pp$ collider at $\mathcal{L}=20~\mathrm {ab}^{-1}$ on the other hand could probe anomalous couplings for $m_{Z'}\in[150,800]~\mathrm{GeV}$ and obtain discovery significances for $m_{Z'}\in[230,330]~\mathrm{GeV}$. Lepton colliders are also well suited for probing these anomalous couplings. In particular we show that a muon collider running at the $Z'$-resonance and an electron-positron collider such as CLIC with $\sqrt{s}=3~{\rm TeV}$ can be complimentary in probing the anomalous couplings for $m_{Z'}\in[100,700]~{\rm GeV}$, with CLIC sensitive to discovery for $m_{Z'}\in[125,225]~{\rm GeV}$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.04132 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Triple gauge boson coupling between Z ′ and two EW bosons V, V˜ . Momenta labels and indices match Eq. (5). Notice that the muon mass cannot be generated as usual via EW symmetry breaking within this model. Being the muon both charged electromagnetically and under the U(1)′ µ gauge symmetry, the ordinary muon Yukawa interaction would explicitly break U(1)′ µ . It is possible to recover this interaction at low energy… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Production cross sections of Z ′ and an EW boson at the LHC at 14 TeV. These processes are calculated from diagrams involving the anomalous gauge couplings. For each mZ′ value gµ is chosen to saturate the trident bound, see Eq. (10). at least O(10) signal events, Z ′ has to be below 300 GeV. In what follows, we define simple search strategies for each production channel in order to estimate the signal significance. … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Integrated luminosity required for exclusion, 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Cross section of µ +µ − → ZZ as a function of √ s for different Z ′ masses, and gµ set to saturate the neutrino trident bound for each mass. Background coming from SM is simulated at LO. σLT = − g 4 µ g 4 Z 2(4π) 5  A˜ 1 − A˜ 2 2 m2 µ m2 Z′s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Cross section for the process µ +µ − → Z ′∗ → ZZ with mZ′ = 200 GeV and gµ = 0.445. We plot in blue (red) the transverse (longitudinal) contributions from the Z ′ propagator, and in black the total cross section. is expected for SM backgrounds. Though the case of a con…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Luminosity required for exclusion, 3σ and 5σ significance for resonant µ +µ − → Z ′ → ZZ → 4j production. Signal Background Rel. acc. sgnl Rel. acc. bkg Initial 4.95 × 103 2.28 × 106 - - 4j sel. 3.02 × 103 1.25 × 106 0.610 0.547 Z windows 1.02 × 103 6.70 × 104 0.336 0.…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Signal and background cross sections for resonant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Luminosity required for exclusion, 3σ and 5σ significance for resonant µ +µ − → Z ′ → ZZ → e +e −jj production. We do not consider the channels with resonant production of Zγ because its cross sections are about four orders of magnitude lower than their respective back…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Signal and background cross section for the process [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Integrated luminosity required for exclusion, 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Integrated luminosity required for exclusion, 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Study of Triple-Gauge-Boson Couplings ZZZ, ZZgam and Zgamgam at LEP

    DELPHI Collaboration, J. Abdallah et al. , “Study of triple-gauge-boson couplings ZZZ, ZZgamma and Zgamma gamma LEP,” Eur. Phys. J. C 51 (2007) 525–542, arXiv:0706.2741 [hep-ex]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2007

  2. [2]

    Search for a scalar or vector particle decaying into Zgamma in ppbar collisions at sqrt(s) = 1.96 TeV

    D0 Collaboration, V. M. Abazov et al. , “Search for a scalar or vector particle decaying into Zγ in p¯p collisions at √s=1.96 TeV,” Phys. Lett. B 671 (2009) 349–355, arXiv:0806.0611 [hep-ex]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  3. [3]

    Wgamma production and limits on anomalous WWgamma couplings in ppbar collisions

    D0 Collaboration, V. M. Abazov et al. , “W γproduction and limits on anomalous W W γ couplings in p¯p collisions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 241803, arXiv:1109.4432 [hep-ex]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  4. [4]

    Limits on Anomalous Trilinear Gauge Couplings in Zgamma Events from ppbar Collisions at sqrt{s} = 1.96 TeV

    CDF Collaboration, T. Aaltonen et al. , “Limits on Anomalous Trilinear Gauge Couplings in Zγ Events from p¯p Collisions at √s = 1.96 TeV,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 051802, arXiv:1103.2990 [hep-ex]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  5. [5]

    Measurement of the ZZ production cross section and limits on anomalous neutral triple gauge couplings in proton-proton collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    A TLASCollaboration, G. Aad et al., “Measurement of the ZZ production cross section and limits on anomalous neutral triple gauge couplings in proton-proton collisions at √s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 041804, arXiv:1110.5016 [hep-ex]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  6. [6]

    Measurement of the W ±Z Production Cross-Section in Proton-Proton Collisions at √s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS Detector,

    A TLASCollaboration, “Measurement of the W ±Z Production Cross-Section in Proton-Proton Collisions at √s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS Detector,”

    work page

  7. [7]

    Dibosons from CMS

    CMS Collaboration, A. Martelli, “Dibosons from CMS,” EPJ Web Conf. 28 (2012) 06002, arXiv:1201.4596 [hep-ex]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  8. [8]

    Heavy Fermion Non-Decoupling Effects in Triple Gauge Boson Vertices

    A. Dedes and K. Suxho, “Heavy Fermion Non-Decoupling Effects in Triple Gauge Boson Vertices,” Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 095024, arXiv:1202.4940 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    Contributions toZZV ∗ (V = γ, Z, Z′) couplings from CP violating flavor changing couplings,

    A. I. Hern´ andez-Ju´ arez, A. Moyotl, and G. Tavares-Velasco, “Contributions toZZV ∗ (V = γ, Z, Z′) couplings from CP violating flavor changing couplings,” Eur. Phys. J. C 81 no. 4, (2021) 304, arXiv:2102.02197 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Gauge anomalies in an effective field theory,

    J. Preskill, “Gauge anomalies in an effective field theory,” Annals Phys. 210 (1991) 323–379

    1991

  3. [11]

    Dark forces coupled to nonconserved currents,

    J. A. Dror, R. Lasenby, and M. Pospelov, “Dark forces coupled to nonconserved currents,” Phys. Rev. D 96 no. 7, (2017) 075036, arXiv:1707.01503 [hep-ph]. 23

    2017 arXiv

  4. [12]

    On dark matter interactions with the Standard Model through an anomalous Z′,

    A. Ismail, A. Katz, and D. Racco, “On dark matter interactions with the Standard Model through an anomalous Z′,” JHEP 10 (2017) 165, arXiv:1707.00709 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Anomalous Z′ and diboson resonances at the LHC,

    A. Ismail and A. Katz, “Anomalous Z′ and diboson resonances at the LHC,” JHEP 04 (2018) 122, arXiv:1712.01840 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Elusive muonic WIMP,

    A. D. Medina, N. I. Mileo, A. Szynkman, and S. A. Tanco, “Elusive muonic WIMP,” Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 7, (2022) 075018, arXiv:2112.09103 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  7. [15]

    The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations,

    J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro, “The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations,” JHEP ...

    2014 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Complete vectorlike fourth family and new U(1)’ for muon anomalies,

    J. Kawamura, S. Raby, and A. Trautner, “Complete vectorlike fourth family and new U(1)’ for muon anomalies,” Phys. Rev. D 100 no. 5, (2019) 055030, arXiv:1906.11297 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Muonphilic dark matter explanation of gamma-ray galactic center excess: a comprehensive analysis,

    M. Abdughani, Y.-Z. Fan, C.-T. Lu, T.-P. Tang, and Y.-L. S. Tsai, “Muonphilic dark matter explanation of gamma-ray galactic center excess: a comprehensive analysis,” JHEP 07 (2022) 127, arXiv:2111.02946 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Dark Matter as a Solution to Muonic Puzzles,

    M. Perelstein and Y. C. San, “Dark Matter as a Solution to Muonic Puzzles,” Phys. Rev. D 103 no. 3, (2021) 035032, arXiv:2009.09867 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Electromagnetic interactions of neutrinos,

    L. Rosenberg, “Electromagnetic interactions of neutrinos,” Phys. Rev. 129 (1963) 2786–2788

    1963

  12. [20]

    Racioppi, Anomalies, U(1)’ and the MSSM

    A. Racioppi, Anomalies, U(1)’ and the MSSM . PhD thesis, Rome U.,Tor Vergata, 2009. arXiv:0907.1535 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  13. [21]

    UFO - The Universal FeynRules Output,

    C. Degrande, C. Duhr, B. Fuks, D. Grellscheid, O. Mattelaer, and T. Reiter, “UFO - The Universal FeynRules Output,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 (2012) 1201–1214, arXiv:1108.2040 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  14. [22]

    FeynRules 2.0 - A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology,

    A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr, and B. Fuks, “FeynRules 2.0 - A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2250–2300, arXiv:1310.1921 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Automatized one loop calculations in four-dimensions and D-dimensions,

    T. Hahn and M. Perez-Victoria, “Automatized one loop calculations in four-dimensions and D-dimensions,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 118 (1999) 153–165, arXiv:hep-ph/9807565

    1999 arXiv

  16. [24]

    An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2

    T. Sj¨ ostrand, S. Ask, J. R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten, S. Mrenna, S. Prestel, C. O. Rasmussen, and P. Z. Skands, “An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2” Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159–177, arXiv:1410.3012 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  17. [25]

    DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment,

    DELPHES 3Collaboration, J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lema ˆ ıtre, A. Mertens, and M. Selvaggi, “DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment,” JHEP 02 (2014) 057, arXiv:1307.6346 [hep-ex]

    2014 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Muon collider detector DELPHES card,

    “Muon collider detector DELPHES card,” https://github.com/delphes/delphes/blob/ master/cards/delphes_card_MuonColliderDet.tcl

  19. [27]

    Recent Electroweak Results from the CCFR Collaboration: Neutrino Tridents and W - Z Interference and the Lorentz Structure of the Weak Current,

    CCFR Collaboration, S. R. Mishra et al. , “Recent Electroweak Results from the CCFR Collaboration: Neutrino Tridents and W - Z Interference and the Lorentz Structure of the Weak Current,” in 26th Rencontres de Moriond: Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories, pp. 87–96. 1991

    1991

  20. [28]

    Neutrino Tridents at DUNE,

    W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, J. Mart ´ ın-Albo, A. Sousa, and M. Wallbank, “Neutrino Tridents at DUNE,” Phys. Rev. D 100 no. 11, (2019) 115029, arXiv:1902.06765 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Physics opportunities of a 100 TeV proton–proton collider,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, T. Han, M. Mangano, and L.-T. Wang, “Physics opportunities of a 100 TeV proton–proton collider,” Phys. Rept. 652 (2016) 1–49, arXiv:1511.06495 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Physics at a 100 TeV pp Collider: Standard Model Processes,

    M. L. Mangano et al. , “Physics at a 100 TeV pp Collider: Standard Model Processes,” arXiv:1607.01831 [hep-ph]. 24

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    A Delphes parameterisation of the FCC-hh detector,

    M. Selvaggi, “A Delphes parameterisation of the FCC-hh detector,” tech. rep., CERN, Geneva, 2020. https://cds.cern.ch/record/2717698

    2020

  24. [32]

    High energy leptonic collisions and electroweak parton distribution functions,

    T. Han, Y. Ma, and K. Xie, “High energy leptonic collisions and electroweak parton distribution functions,” Phys. Rev. D 103 no. 3, (2021) L031301, arXiv:2007.14300 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Leptons in the proton,

    L. Buonocore, P. Nason, F. Tramontano, and G. Zanderighi, “Leptons in the proton,” JHEP 08 no. 08, (2020) 019, arXiv:2005.06477 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Testing the lepton content of the proton at HERA and EIC,

    L. Da Rold, A. D. Medina, S. Roy, and C. E. M. Wagner, “Testing the lepton content of the proton at HERA and EIC,” arXiv:2408.12644 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    Towards a muon collider,

    C. Accettura et al. , “Towards a muon collider,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83 no. 9, (2023) 864, arXiv:2303.08533 [physics.acc-ph]. [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 84, 36 (2024)]

    2023 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Muon Collider Forum report,

    K. M. Black et al. , “Muon Collider Forum report,” JINST 19 no. 02, (2024) T02015, arXiv:2209.01318 [hep-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Muon Colliders,

    J. P. Delahaye, M. Diemoz, K. Long, B. Mansouli´ e, N. Pastrone, L. Rivkin, D. Schulte, A. Skrinsky, and A. Wulzer, “Muon Colliders,” arXiv:1901.06150 [physics.acc-ph]

    1901 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Detector and Physics Performance at a Muon Collider,

    N. Bartosik et al. , “Detector and Physics Performance at a Muon Collider,” JINST 15 no. 05, (2020) P05001, arXiv:2001.04431 [hep-ex]

    2020 arXiv

  31. [39]

    A Muon Collider Facility for Physics Discovery,

    Muon ColliderCollaboration, D. Stratakis et al. , “A Muon Collider Facility for Physics Discovery,” arXiv:2203.08033 [physics.acc-ph]

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    The CLIC Potential for New Physics,

    CLIC Collaboration, J. de Blas et al. , “The CLIC Potential for New Physics,” arXiv:1812.02093 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) - Project Implementation Plan,

    CLIC acceleratorCollaboration, “The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) - Project Implementation Plan,” arXiv:1903.08655 [physics.acc-ph]

    1903 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Higgs boson precision measurements at a 125 GeV muon collider,

    J. de Blas, J. Gu, and Z. Liu, “Higgs boson precision measurements at a 125 GeV muon collider,” Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 7, (2022) 073007, arXiv:2203.04324 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  35. [43]

    FCC-ee: The Lepton Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 2,

    FCC Collaboration, A. Abada et al. , “FCC-ee: The Lepton Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 2,” Eur. Phys. J. ST 228 no. 2, (2019) 261–623

    2019

  36. [44]

    Physics at the FCC-ee,

    D. d’Enterria, “Physics at the FCC-ee,” in Proceedings, 17th Lomonosov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics: Moscow, Russia, August 20-26, 2015 , pp. 182–191. 2017. arXiv:1602.05043 [hep-ex]

    2015 arXiv

  37. [45]

    The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report - Volume 1: Executive Summary,

    T. Behnke, J. E. Brau, B. Foster, J. Fuster, M. Harrison, J. M. Paterson, M. Peskin, M. Stanitzki, N. Walker, and H. Yamamoto, “The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report - Volume 1: Executive Summary,” arXiv:1306.6327 [physics.acc-ph]

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report - Volume 2: Physics,

    H. Baer, T. Barklow, et al. , “The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report - Volume 2: Physics,” arXiv:1306.6352 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  39. [47]

    CEPC Conceptual Design Report,

    CEPC Study GroupCollaboration, “CEPC Conceptual Design Report,” arXiv:1809.00285 [physics.acc-ph]

    arXiv

  40. [48]

    CEPC Conceptual Design Report: Volume 2 - Physics & Detector,

    CEPC Study GroupCollaboration, M. Dong et al. , “CEPC Conceptual Design Report: Volume 2 - Physics & Detector,” arXiv:1811.10545 [hep-ex]

    arXiv

  41. [49]

    Minimal Anomalous U(1)-prime Extension of the MSSM,

    P. Anastasopoulos, F. Fucito, A. Lionetto, G. Pradisi, A. Racioppi, and Y. S. Stanev, “Minimal Anomalous U(1)-prime Extension of the MSSM,” Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 085014, arXiv:0804.1156 [hep-th]. 25

    2008 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.