Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 36 references

Statistical estimation of a mean-field FitzHugh-Nagumo model

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Empirical moments of a neuron population identify the six FitzHugh-Nagumo parameters at the optimal $\sqrt{N}$ rate.

desk verdict The Bernstein and oracle inequalities are a real extension of Della Maestra–Hoffmann, but the FitzHugh–Nagumo moment estimator is built on algebraically wrong moment equations, so Theorem 6 fails as stated. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.04257 v1 pith:ABOEEGWQ submitted 2025-01-08 math.ST stat.TH

Claudia Fonte Sanchez , Marc Hoffmann This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.STstat.TH MSC 62G0562M0560J8060J2092D25
keywords FitzHugh-Nagumomodelmean-fieldinteractingparticlesystemsMcKean-VlasovequationsVlasov-Fokker-PlanckequationBernsteinconcentrationinequalityGoldenshluger-Lepskiestimatormomentestimationnonparametricminimax
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper develops a statistical inference program for a mean-field system of $N$ interacting particles in which one component is diffusive and the other is purely transported, a setting that includes kinetic models and the FitzHugh-Nagumo model of neuron populations. It proves a Bernstein concentration inequality for the empirical measure around the solution of the limiting Vlasov-Fokker-Planck equation, and uses it to build a Goldenshluger-Lepski kernel estimator of the density with an oracle inequality and minimax optimality. The central result for applications is the estimation of the six parameters $\vartheta=(I,\bar a,\bar b,\bar c,\lambda,\sigma^2)$ from six empirical moments of the population at a fixed time, with exponential nonasymptotic deviation bounds. If the moment equations are right, these parameters are recovered at the parametric $\sqrt{N}$ rate, the fastest possible for a regular parametric model.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by three objects. The first is a Bernstein inequality for $\nu_N-\nu$: for test functions $\varphi$ it gives $P_N(|\int\varphi\,d(\nu_N-\nu)|\ge\gamma)\le c_1\exp(-c_2 N\gamma^2/(|\varphi|^2_{L^2(\nu)}+|\varphi|_\infty\gamma))$, obtained by a Girsanov change of measure from an independent-particle system and valid for unbounded polynomial test functions. The second is the moment system $A=M\vartheta+\Lambda$, whose rows are time integrals of moments of the flow $\mu_t$; inverting its empirical version defines $\hat\vartheta_N$. The third is the Goldenshluger-Lepski selection rule, which chooses a bandwidth $\hat h_N$ by balancing the empirical bias term $A^N_h$ against the variance term $V^N_h\asymp h^{-2d}N^{-1}\log N$.

What would settle it

Pick a parameter value inside the stated range, simulate the FitzHugh-Nagumo McKean-Vlasov flow at high accuracy, and recompute the six population moment identities $A=M\vartheta+\Lambda$ symbolically; any coefficient mismatch in the rows of $M$, such as on the $\lambda$ or $\sigma^2$ terms, or any permitted parameter choice with $\det M=0$, would make the estimator converge to the wrong vector and would falsify Theorem 6.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central statistical claim is that the parameter vector of the mean-field FitzHugh-Nagumo model is identifiable from a six-by-six linear system in moments of the flow, and that the plug-in estimator $\hat\vartheta_N = \hat M_N^{-1}(\hat A_N - \hat\Lambda_N)$ satisfies the concentration bound $P_N(|\hat\vartheta_N-\vartheta|\ge\gamma) \le \zeta_1 \exp(-\zeta_2 N \min(\gamma,1)^2/(1+\max(\gamma,1)))$. This gives tightness of $\sqrt{N}(\hat\vartheta_N-\vartheta)$ under $P_N$, hence estimation at the parametric rate. In the same framework, the adaptive kernel estimator $\hat\mu^N_{GL}$ achieves an oracle inequality matching the best bias-variance trade-off over a bandwidth grid, which yields the minimax pointwise rate $N^{-\beta/(\beta+d)}$ up to logarithms for a $2d$-dimensional density of Hölder smoothness $\beta$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the six displayed moment equations are algebraically correct and that the $6\times6$ matrix $M$ built from them is invertible with bounded inverse over the stated parameter range; the paper states this system without proving the algebra or the invertibility.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If Theorem 6 holds, all six parameters of the neuron-network model are estimable at the $\sqrt{N}$ rate from a single snapshot of population moments at time $T$.
  • The concentration inequality in Theorem 4 gives nonasymptotic control for unbounded polynomial test functions, so moment statistics of arbitrarily high order fall under the same exponential bounds.
  • Theorem 5 makes the kernel density estimator adaptive: the data choose the bandwidth, and the price compared with the best oracle choice is only logarithmic.
  • The theory covers degenerate kinetic equations, where the $Y$ component has no diffusion, under Lyapunov-type growth instead of global Lipschitz assumptions, which applies to the cubic FitzHugh-Nagumo drift.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same moment-inversion scheme should transfer to other mean-field models whose drift is polynomial and linear in the parameters, once the corresponding matrix is checked for invertibility.
  • Because the probability measure $\rho(dt)$ in Theorem 4 is arbitrary, a discretized version of the moment integrals over a fine time grid should inherit similar bounds, although the paper does not quantify the discretization error.
  • The $2d$-dimensional minimax rate warns of the curse of dimensionality, so exploiting the kinetic structure to estimate lower-dimensional summaries is a natural next step.
  • A natural follow-up is to turn the tightness in Theorem 6 into a central limit theorem with an explicit covariance matrix, which would produce calibrated confidence intervals; the paper stops at tightness.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies a mean-field system of N interacting particles in R^d x R^d with degenerate diffusion in the first coordinate. Its three advertised contributions are: (i) a Bernstein-type concentration inequality for the empirical measure around the solution of the kinetic Vlasov-Fokker-Planck equation, extending earlier work of Della Maestra and Hoffmann; (ii) a pointwise Goldenshluger-Lepski kernel estimator of the density with an oracle inequality and minimax adaptation; and (iii) a moment estimator for the six parameters of a FitzHugh-Nagumo model for populations of neurons, with a nonasymptotic deviation bound implying sqrt(N)-tightness. The proofs use a Girsanov change-of-measure argument and a Lyapunov condition in place of global Lipschitz assumptions.

Significance. The probabilistic and nonparametric parts of the paper are potentially valuable: the Bernstein inequality covers kinetic models with degenerate diffusion and unbounded test functions, and the oracle inequality would give adaptive pointwise estimation in a 2d-dimensional density problem. The paper also makes its moment-growth assumptions explicit and gives a self-contained proof of well-posedness. However, the applied centerpiece, the FitzHugh-Nagumo moment estimator, is built on an algebraically incorrect moment system, and the nonparametric variance penalty is mis-specified. As a result, the main advertised claims in Theorems 5 and 6 are not established as stated.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.3, Theorem 6] The displayed moment evolution for a_k is inconsistent with the SDE model (18). Applying Ito's formula to a_k(t) = integral of (x^k + y^k) d mu_t gives d/dt a_k(t) = k( m_{k,0} - (1/3)m_{k+2,0} - m_{k-1,1} + I m_{k-1,0} - lambda m_{k,0} + lambda m_{1,0} m_{k-1,0} ) + k( cbar m_{1,k-1} + abar m_{0,k-1} - bbar m_{0,k} ) + (sigma^2/2) k(k-1) m_{k-2,0}. The paper's expansion and the matrix row immediately before (21) do not match this identity: the displayed cbar, abar, bbar and lambda terms are missing the factor k; the lambda term is written as -lambda(m_{k,0} + m_{1,0}m_{k-1,0}) instead of -lambda m_{k,0} + lambda m_{1,0}m_{k-1,0}; the Lambda_k formula gives m_{k-1,1} the coefficient 1/3 instead of 1; and the sigma^2 entry is m_{k-2,k} instead of m_{k-2,0}. In addition, the column order in the displayed row is (I, cbar, abar, bbar, lambda, sigma^2), whereas (19) defines the parameter vector as (I, abar, bbar, cbar, lambda, sigma^2). Since the estimator (21) is defined by inverting this matrix, the identification identity theta = M^{-1}(A - Lambda) used in the proof of Theorem 6 is false for the estimator as defined, and Theorem 6 is unsupported.
  2. [Section 2.3, Theorem 6] The proof of Theorem 6 requires the 6x6 matrix M to be invertible with a bounded inverse uniformly over the admissible parameter range, because the estimator is M_hat_N^{-1}(A_hat_N - Lambda_hat_N) and the constants zeta_2 depend on |M^{-1}|. No argument for this invertibility is supplied. The entries of M are time-integrals of moments of the unknown law mu_t, and invertibility is not immediate from the displayed formulas; without a uniform lower bound on the smallest singular value of M, the event that M_hat_N is singular is uncontrolled. The theorem should either prove such a bound or explicitly restrict the parameter set to a region on which it holds.
  3. [Assumption 2(iii), Section 2.1] The FitzHugh-Nagumo parameter set is stated as a, I, c > 0 and b in R, but for b < 0 (equivalently bbar < 0) the Lyapunov condition in Assumption 2(iii) fails. With G(x,y) = cbar x + abar - bbar y, the quantity y G(x,y) = cbar x y + abar y + |bbar| y^2 cannot be bounded above by k_3(1 + x^2 + y^2) for any finite k_3. Since Theorem 4, which is invoked in the proof of Theorem 6, is proved under Assumption 2(iii), the claimed concentration and estimation results do not cover b < 0. The authors should either restrict the statement to b > 0 or provide a separate argument for the negative-b case.
  4. [Theorem 5, Eq. (15)] The variance penalty in the nonparametric oracle inequality is mis-specified. Since K_h(x,y) = h^{-2d} K(h^{-1}x, h^{-1}y), the variance of the kernel estimator is of order N^{-1} h^{-2d}; however, (15) defines V_N^h = rho |K|^2_{L^2} (log N) N^{-1} h^{-d}. The introduction correctly states the variance order as h^{-2d} N^{-1}, and the proof of Lemma 11 obtains (N h^{2d})^{-1}. With V_N^h as written, balancing V_N^h against a squared bias of order h^{2 beta} gives a squared error of order N^{-2 beta/(2 beta + d)}, which is not the announced minimax rate N^{- beta/(beta + d)} for a 2d-dimensional Holder class. The definition of V_N^h should be h^{-2d}, and the bandwidth calibration and proofs should be made consistent with that choice.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Section 1.1] There are several typographical and grammatical errors, for example 'on that may serve', 'an optimally estimate', and 'The versatiliy of such models go way beyond'.
  2. [Section 2.2] The sentence 'Thje constants c1, c2 and c3 ...' has a typo ('Thje') and should be rewritten for clarity.
  3. [Section 2.3] The notation is inconsistent in places: 'aik(mu_T)' mixes italic and Roman letters, 'm_{k,0}(mus)' is a typo for m_{k,0}(mu_s), and the estimator is sometimes written as mu_hat^N_GL(t0,x0) without the y0 argument.
  4. [Section 3.4] In Step 2 of the proof of Theorem 5, the notation '(t0, x0y0)' should be '(t0, x0, y0)', and the role of the constant rho_1 mentioned in the theorem statement is not defined consistently with rho in (15).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the moment estimator is a standard method-of-moments inversion of the model's own moment dynamics, and the one self-citation is to prior work with independent published proofs.

full rationale

The central derivations do not reduce to their own inputs by construction. The moment estimator in (21) is obtained by inverting the model-derived linear system A = Mϑ + Λ; this is classical method-of-moments identification, not a fitted parameter relabeled as a prediction, and no subset of data is held out to be 'predicted' from a fit to the same quantity. Theorem 4 is presented as an extension of [DMH22], and the proof supplies the Girsanov and Bernstein arguments, citing the earlier paper for a generic estimate while also referencing Lacker; because [DMH22] is prior published work whose assumptions do not include the present theorem, this self-citation is not load-bearing in a way that makes the current claim equivalent to its citation. Theorem 5 is a standard Goldenshluger-Lepski oracle inequality with an explicit proof from Theorem 4. The potential algebraic misstatements in Section 2.3 (missing factors of k and the sign of the λ moment term) would be a correctness and identification defect, not circularity: if the coefficients are wrong, the estimator converges to the wrong value rather than to an input by construction. The absence of a proof of the algebraic identity and of the invertibility of M is also a correctness-support gap, not a circular step. The overall score reflects only the minor, non-circular reliance on the authors' earlier Bernstein framework.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on standard probabilistic assumptions (Assumptions 1-2), the [GL10] transport inequality, and an unproved invertibility/identifiability assertion for the FitzHugh-Nagumo moment matrix. No new entities or fitted constants are introduced.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Assumption 1: initial measure µ0 has Gaussian-type moment growth: ∫|x|^{2p} dµ0 ≤ κp!.
    Used throughout to control moments of the solution (Lemma 9) and exponential integrability (Corollary 10).
  • domain assumption Assumption 2(i): b1 is a Lipschitz functional of the measure via the kernel b̃1.
    Ensures well-posedness and the W1 control in the fixed-point argument; also used in the Girsanov estimate (35).
  • domain assumption Assumption 2(ii): b2 is globally Lipschitz.
    Guarantees unique non-explosive Y given X (Section 3.1).
  • domain assumption Assumption 2(iii): Lyapunov condition x^T b1 + y^T b2 ≤ k3(1+|(x,y)|²+|(u,v)|²).
    Provides the moment bound via Grönwall; the FhN model satisfies this only when b > 0, but the paper allows b ∈ R.
  • standard math Transport inequality W1(µ_t,ν_t) ≤ k5√H_t(µ|ν) from [GL10, Prop 6.3].
    Used in the fixed-point proof of Theorem 3 to close the contraction.
  • domain assumption The density µ_t(x,y) is locally bounded and Hölder smooth of order β in (x,y).
    Needed for the bias term B_h^N and the variance bound in Lemma 11; only continuity is cited from [KMM10].
  • ad hoc to paper The 6x6 moment matrix M is invertible with bounded inverse for the FitzHugh-Nagumo parameters.
    Identifiability of ϑ is asserted without proof; Theorem 6's constants depend on |M^{-1}|.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Statistical estimation of a mean-field FitzHugh-Nagumo model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ABOEEGWQ

@misc{pith2026250104257,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Statistical estimation of a mean-field FitzHugh-Nagumo model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ABOEEGWQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.04257}
}
abstract

We consider an interacting system of particles with value in $\mathbb{R}^d \times \mathbb{R}^d$, governed by transport and diffusion on the first component, on that may serve as a representative model for kinetic models with a degenerate component. In a first part, we control the fluctuations of the empirical measure of the system around the solution of the corresponding Vlasov-Fokker-Planck equation by proving a Bernstein concentration inequality, extending a previous result of arXiv:2011.03762 in several directions. In a second part, we study the nonparametric statistical estimation of the classical solution of Vlasov-Fokker-Planck equation from the observation of the empirical measure and prove an oracle inequality using the Goldenshluger-Lepski methodology and we obtain minimax optimality. We then specialise on the FitzHugh-Nagumo model for populations of neurons. We consider a version of the model proposed in Mischler et al. arXiv:1503.00492 an optimally estimate the $6$ parameters of the model by moment estimators.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Stochastic mean-field limit: non- L ipschitz forces & swarming

    F Bolley, JA Canizo, and JA Carrillo. Stochastic mean-field limit: non- L ipschitz forces & swarming. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences

    work page

  2. [2]

    Mean-field description and propagation of chaos in networks of H odgkin- H uxley and F itz H ugh- N agumo neurons

    Javier Baladron, Diego Fasoli, Olivier Faugeras, and Jonathan Touboul. Mean-field description and propagation of chaos in networks of H odgkin- H uxley and F itz H ugh- N agumo neurons. The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience , 2(1):1--50, 2012

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    Trend to equilibrium and particle approximation for a weakly selfconsistent V lasov- F okker- P lanck equation

    Fran c ois Bolley, Arnaud Guillin, and Florent Malrieu. Trend to equilibrium and particle approximation for a weakly selfconsistent V lasov- F okker- P lanck equation. ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis , 44(5):867--884, 2010

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    Quantitative concentration inequalities for empirical measures on non-compact spaces

    Fran c ois Bolley, Arnaud Guillin, and C \'e dric Villani. Quantitative concentration inequalities for empirical measures on non-compact spaces. Probability Theory and Related Fields , 137:541--593, 2007

    work page 2007

  5. [5]

    A new approach to the mean-field limit of V lasov- F okker- P lanck equations

    Didier Bresch, Pierre-Emmanuel Jabin, and Juan Soler. A new approach to the mean-field limit of V lasov- F okker- P lanck equations. Analysis and PDE, forthcoming. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.15747 , 2022

    arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    Concentration inequalities: A nonasymptotic theory of independence

    St \'e phane Boucheron, G \'a bor Lugosi, and Pascal Massart. Concentration inequalities: A nonasymptotic theory of independence . Oxford university press, 2013

    2013

  7. [7]

    Parameter estimation of the F itz H ugh- N agumo model using noisy measurements for membrane potential

    Yanqiu Che, Li-Hui Geng, Chunxiao Han, Shigang Cui, and Jiang Wang. Parameter estimation of the F itz H ugh- N agumo model using noisy measurements for membrane potential. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science , 22(2):023139, 2012

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Well-posedness of the limiting equation of a noisy consensus model in opinion dynamics

    Bernard Chazelle, Quansen Jiu, Qianxiao Li, and Chu Wang. Well-posedness of the limiting equation of a noisy consensus model in opinion dynamics. Journal of Differential Equations , 263(1):365--397, 2017

    work page 2017

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    Nonparametric estimation for interacting particle systems: M c K ean- V lasov models

    Laetitia Della Maestra and Marc Hoffmann. Nonparametric estimation for interacting particle systems: M c K ean- V lasov models. Probability Theory and Related Fields , 182:551--613, 2022

    2022

  2. [10]

    Mathematical models of threshold phenomena in the nerve membrane

    Richard FitzHugh. Mathematical models of threshold phenomena in the nerve membrane. The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics , 17(4):257--278, 1955

    1955

  3. [11]

    A H ilbertian approach for fluctuations on the mckean-vlasov model

    Begona Fernandez and Sylvie M \'e l \'e ard. A H ilbertian approach for fluctuations on the mckean-vlasov model. Stochastic processes and their applications , 71(1):33--53, 1997

    1997

  4. [12]

    Systemic risk illustrated

    Jean-Pierre Fouque and Li-Hsien Sun. Systemic risk illustrated. Handbook on Systemic Risk; Fouque, JP; Langsam, J., Eds , 2012

    2012

  5. [13]

    Universal pointwise selection rule in multivariate function estimation

    Alexander Goldenshluger and Oleg Lepski. Universal pointwise selection rule in multivariate function estimation. Bernoulli , 14(4):1150--1190, 2008

    2008

  6. [14]

    Transport inequalities

    Nathael Gozlan and Christian L \'e onard. Transport inequalities. a survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:1003.3852 , 2010

    2010 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Bandwidth selection in kernel density estimation: oracle inequalities and adaptive minimax optimality

    Alexander Goldenshluger and Oleg Lepski. Bandwidth selection in kernel density estimation: oracle inequalities and adaptive minimax optimality. Ann. Statist. , 39(3):1608--1632, 2011

    2011

  8. [16]

    On adaptive minimax density estimation on R^d

    Alexander Goldenshluger and Oleg Lepski. On adaptive minimax density estimation on R^d . Probab. Theory Related Fields , 159(3-4):479--543, 2014

    2014

  9. [17]

    The kinetic F okker- P lanck equation with mean field interaction

    Arnaud Guillin, Wei Liu, Liming Wu, and Chaoen Zhang. The kinetic F okker- P lanck equation with mean field interaction. Journal de Math \'e matiques Pures et Appliqu \'e es , 150:1--23, 2021

    2021

  10. [18]

    A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve

    Alan L Hodgkin and Andrew F Huxley. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. The Journal of physiology , 117(4):500--544, 1952

    1952

  11. [19]

    Markov chain monte carlo approach to parameter estimation in the F itz H ugh-nagumo model

    Anders Jensen, Susanne Ditlevsen, Mathieu Kessler, and Omiros Papaspiliopoulos. Markov chain monte carlo approach to parameter estimation in the F itz H ugh-nagumo model. Physical Review E , 86(4):041114, 2012

    2012

  12. [20]

    Explicit parametrix and local limit theorems for some degenerate diffusion processes

    Valentin Konakov, St \'e phane Menozzi, and Stanislav Molchanov. Explicit parametrix and local limit theorems for some degenerate diffusion processes. In Annales de l'IHP Probabilit \'e s et statistiques , volume 46, pages 908--923, 2010

    2010

  13. [21]

    On a strong form of propagation of chaos for M c K ean- V lasov equations

    Daniel Lacker et al. On a strong form of propagation of chaos for M c K ean- V lasov equations. Electronic Communications in Probability , 23, 2018

    2018

  14. [22]

    Periodicity induced by noise and interaction in the kinetic mean-field FitzHugh-Nagumo model

    Eric Lu c on and Christophe Poquet . Periodicity induced by noise and interaction in the kinetic mean-field FitzHugh-Nagumo model . arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:1811.00305, Nov 2018

    2018 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Emergence of oscillatory behaviors for excitable systems with noise and mean-field interaction: A slow-fast dynamics approach

    Eric Lu c on and Christophe Poquet. Emergence of oscillatory behaviors for excitable systems with noise and mean-field interaction: A slow-fast dynamics approach. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 2019

    2019

  16. [24]

    Stochastic differential equations and applications

    Xuerong Mao. Stochastic differential equations and applications . Elsevier, 2007

    2007

  17. [25]

    A non-local model for a swarm

    Alexander Mogilner and Leah Edelstein-Keshet. A non-local model for a swarm. Journal of mathematical biology , 38:534--570, 1999

    1999

  18. [26]

    A class of M arkov processes associated with nonlinear parabolic equations

    Henry P McKean Jr. A class of M arkov processes associated with nonlinear parabolic equations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 56(6):1907--1911, 1966

    1907

  19. [27]

    On a kinetic F itzhugh-- N agumo model of neuronal network

    St \'e phane Mischler, Crist \'o bal Quininao, and Jonathan Touboul. On a kinetic F itzhugh-- N agumo model of neuronal network. Communications in mathematical physics , 342(3):1001--1042, 2016

    2016

  20. [28]

    An active pulse transmission line simulating nerve axon

    Jinichi Nagumo, Suguru Arimoto, and Shuji Yoshizawa. An active pulse transmission line simulating nerve axon. Proceedings of the IRE , 50(10):2061--2070, 1962

    1962

  21. [29]

    Stochastic Integration and Differential Equations , volume 21

    Philip Protter. Stochastic Integration and Differential Equations , volume 21. Springer, 2013

    2013

  22. [30]

    Parameter estimation with dense and convolutional neural networks applied to the F itz H ugh-- N agumo ode

    Johann Rudi, Julie Bessac, and Amanda Lenzi. Parameter estimation with dense and convolutional neural networks applied to the F itz H ugh-- N agumo ode. In Mathematical and Scientific Machine Learning , pages 781--808. PMLR, 2022

    2022

  23. [31]

    The FitzHugh-Nagumo model: bifurcation and dynamics , volume 10

    Carmen Rocsoreanu, Adelina Georgescu, and Nicolaie Giurgiteanu. The FitzHugh-Nagumo model: bifurcation and dynamics , volume 10. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

    2012

  24. [32]

    Nonlinear reflecting diffusion process, and the propagation of chaos and fluctuations associated

    Alain-Sol Sznitman. Nonlinear reflecting diffusion process, and the propagation of chaos and fluctuations associated. Journal of functional analysis , 56(3):311--336, 1984

    1984

  25. [33]

    Topics in propagation of chaos

    Alain-Sol Sznitman. Topics in propagation of chaos. In Ecole d' \'e t \'e de probabilit \'e s de Saint-Flour XIX—1989 , pages 165--251. Springer, 1991

    1989

  26. [34]

    Central limit theorem for a simple diffusion model of interacting particles

    Hiroshi Tanaka and Masuyuki Hitsuda. Central limit theorem for a simple diffusion model of interacting particles. Hiroshima Mathematical Journal , 11(2):415--423, 1981

    1981

  27. [35]

    Introduction to Nonparametric Estimation

    Alexandre B Tsybakov. Introduction to Nonparametric Estimation . Springer, 2009

    2009

  28. [36]

    Large and moderate deviations and exponential convergence for stochastic damping H amiltonian systems

    Liming Wu. Large and moderate deviations and exponential convergence for stochastic damping H amiltonian systems. Stochastic processes and their applications , 91(2):205--238, 2001

    2001

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.