Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 60 references

Real-Time, Label-free Electrical Transduction of Catalytic Events in a Single-Protein Redox Enzymatic Junction

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Conductance switching in a single trapped enzyme tracks catalytic turnover in real time.

desk verdict A plausible new single-enzyme electrical readout with solid controls, but the quantitative link between switching and turnover needs tighter validation. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.04589 v1 pith:ZPOWRWYS submitted 2025-01-08 physics.bio-ph

Tracy Quynh Ha , Albert C. Aragonès , Qiankun Wang , Desmond Koomson , Nashili Kibria , Jhanelle White , Kavita Garg , Jessica Peate
show 4 more authors
Alex P.S. Brogan Leigh Aldous Sarah M. Barry Ismael Díez-Pérez
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.bio-ph
keywords single-enzymecatalysissingle-proteinjunctionconductanceswitchingredoxenzymeelectrochemicalscanningtunnellingmicroscopylabel-freebiosensingcytochromeP450camglutathionereductase
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a label-free, all-electrical way to watch individual enzyme molecules catalyse reactions in real time. The authors trap unmodified redox enzymes—cytochrome P450cam and glutathione reductase—in a nanoscale tunnelling junction under electrochemical control, and find that during catalysis the junction current switches between two conductance levels. They argue that each switch marks a catalytic cycle: a transient oxidation of the enzyme's cofactor momentarily opens a redox-mediated tunnelling channel, raising the conductance until the cofactor returns to its reduced state. Counting these switches over thousands of trapping events gives average frequencies that, after subtracting a background, fall inside the enzymes' reported bulk turnover ranges. If correct, this turns a single-protein electrical junction into a direct, label-free readout of single-enzyme activity and heterogeneity.

What carries the argument

The central object is the electrochemically controlled single-protein tunnelling junction: an STM tip and Au(111) substrate separated by a 3.8-5.7 nm gap in aqueous buffer, with one enzyme transiently trapped between them. The carrying mechanism is the redox-gated sequential tunnelling channel: when the enzyme's cofactor (heme in P450cam, FAD in GR) is transiently oxidised during a catalytic cycle, its redox level comes into resonance with the electrode Fermi levels, opening an additional two-step electron-transfer channel that raises the junction conductance; returning to the reduced state closes it. The argument is carried by counting these conductance switches in long current-time traces, classifying blinks as silent or switching with an automated algorithm plus Gaussian mixture and hidden Markov models, and converting switch counts into bulk and single-enzyme frequencies via equations [1] and [2].

What would settle it

Record the timing of conductance switches in the same junction while detecting the reaction product (5-exo-hydroxycamphor for P450cam, GSH for GR) with a single-molecule-sensitive assay; the central claim would fail if switches occur with no product, if product is formed with no accompanying switch, or if the switching rate does not respond to substrate concentration or known inhibitors.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the two-level conductance fluctuations observed in a single trapped redox enzyme junction are the electrical signature of individual catalytic turnovers. Under reducing potentials with substrate present (and mediator for GR), roughly 30% of protein trapping events show switching blinks, whereas inactive conditions yield only 5-7%. The switching frequencies extracted over long records are 2573 min$^{-1}$ for P450cam and 16292 min$^{-1}$ for GR; subtracting the inactive background gives 1790 and 12871 min$^{-1}$, both within the reported bulk $k_{\mathrm{cat}}$ ranges of 124-3960 and 12600-17500 min$^{-1}$. The authors interpret this agreement as validation that the switching events transduce catalysis. They further report single-enzyme frequencies of 6908 and 42943 min$^{-1}$, about threefold higher than the bulk values, which they read as the signature of dynamic disorder and catalytic heterogeneity masked by ensemble averaging.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that each two-level conductance switch in an active junction is caused by a catalytic turnover—the transient oxidation of the enzyme's cofactor—and not by trapping artifacts, substrate binding, or redox fluctuations that do not lead to product formation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Because the readout needs no fluorescent label, the method should extend to unmodified redox enzymes that are hard to label or prone to photobleaching.
  • Bulk catalytic turnover numbers are recoverable from purely electrical records, so the switching signal is a quantitative activity readout, not just an on-off indicator.
  • The roughly threefold gap between single-enzyme and bulk frequencies gives a direct measurement of catalytic heterogeneity and dynamic disorder.
  • The persistent 5-7% switching under inactive conditions implies that a background correction is needed before equating switches with successful turnovers.
  • The proposed mechanism predicts that any redox enzyme whose cofactor is transiently oxidised during turnover should show similar two-level conductance switching in such a junction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the turnover assignment holds, varying substrate concentration while counting switches should recover single-molecule Michaelis-Menten behaviour, a testable extension the paper does not report.
  • The residual switching under inactive conditions suggests some switches may be redox or conformational fluctuations that do not produce product; direct single-molecule product detection in the junction would quantify that fraction.
  • The consistent ~3 ratio of single-enzyme to bulk frequency across two very different enzymes hints that dynamic disorder may scale with catalytic rate, a pattern worth testing across more enzyme families.
  • Because the trapping geometry is built from standard STM nanogap technology, the approach could in principle be ported to large arrays of nanogap electrodes for label-free enzyme screening.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an electrochemical STM-based single-protein junction platform in which individual unmodified redox enzymes (cytochrome P450cam and glutathione reductase) are transiently trapped between a Au(111) substrate and an STM tip. Under electrocatalytic conditions, the authors observe two-level conductance fluctuations ('switching' events) in current-time traces, which they attribute to transient oxidation of the enzyme cofactor during each catalytic turnover. Using a Python-based classification algorithm and HMM/GMM analyses, they extract switching frequencies and compare them with literature kcat values: the 'bulk' frequencies after background correction are 1790 min^-1 for P450cam and 12871 min^-1 for GR, both within the cited literature ranges. The paper claims real-time, label-free electrical transduction of single-enzyme catalytic events, and further reports a 'single-enzyme' frequency roughly threefold higher than the bulk frequency, interpreted as evidence of dynamic disorder and catalytic heterogeneity.

Significance. If the switching-to-turnover assignment is valid, this would be a notable advance: label-free, real-time electrical detection of individual catalytic events in unmodified redox enzymes, with potential biosensing applications. The paper has genuine strengths: the active/inactive control design is appropriate; bulk electrocatalytic activity is verified by CV and by GC-MS and UV-visible product detection; two enzymes with different cofactors (heme vs FAD), chemistries, and rate ranges are compared; and a nontrivial automated classification pipeline (with both HMM and GMM) is used. The proposed mechanism (redox-state-gated sequential tunnelling) is physically plausible and consistent with prior work on redox protein junctions. However, the central validation rests on the agreement between measured switching frequencies and literature kcat values, and that agreement is currently not quantitative enough to be discriminating: the background correction is dimensionally ambiguous, the literature kcat ranges are very broad, and the reported frequencies carry no statistical uncertainties. These issues are fixable but must be addressed before the central claim can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [Table 1, Eq. (1), Fig. 5] The background subtraction used to obtain the corrected bulk frequencies is dimensionally inconsistent as reported. Fig. 5 reports 5-7% switching under inactive conditions as a percentage of traces, but Eq. (1) defines bulk frequency as events per total protein trapping time (min^-1). A percentage of traces cannot be subtracted from a per-minute frequency without stating the conversion (e.g., the per-trace residence time and the event count per trace). The manuscript does not report an inactive-condition frequency, so the corrected values of 1790 and 12871 min^-1 in Table 1 cannot be reproduced or checked. Please provide the raw event counts, total residence times, and an explicit calculation showing how the 5-7% background translates into the subtracted frequency.
  2. [Table 1] The literature kcat ranges used for validation are too broad to be discriminating. For P450cam the cited range is 124-3960 min^-1, a factor of ~32, and the raw measured bulk frequency of 2573 min^-1 is already within this range before any background correction; for GR the range is 12600-17500 min^-1, and the corrected value of 12871 min^-1 sits at its lower boundary. With such wide windows, nearly any measured frequency within an order of magnitude would 'agree' with kcat. The claim of 'exquisite agreement' therefore requires either narrower benchmark values (ideally measured under the same solution conditions with the same enzyme preparation) or a statistical comparison that quantifies the expected spread of the measured frequencies.
  3. [Eqs. (1)-(2), Table 1] The reported bulk and single-enzyme frequencies are presented without error bars or confidence intervals, and the manuscript does not state the number of switching events, the total protein trapping time, or the number of traces contributing to each frequency. Because the central conclusion is a quantitative correlation between measured frequencies and kcat, the absence of uncertainty estimates makes it impossible to assess whether the observed 3-fold difference between bulk and single-enzyme frequencies is significant or whether the agreement with kcat is better than chance. Please report per-condition event counts, total times, and bootstrap or other uncertainty estimates for each frequency.
  4. [Results, 'Electrochemically Controlled Single-Enzyme Catalytic Junctions'; Fig. 5; Fig. 6] The assignment of each two-level switching event to a catalytic turnover is not directly verified. The authors note that 5-7% of traces show switching under inactive conditions, indicating that switching is not exclusive to catalysis, and no single-molecule product detection or independent probe of the enzyme redox state is provided to rule out substrate-binding fluctuations, conformational dynamics, or trapping artifacts as the cause of the switching signal. The proposed mechanism in Fig. 6 (transient cofactor oxidation opening a sequential tunnelling channel) is plausible and consistent with earlier redox-protein junction work, but it is presented as the interpretation of the frequency correlation rather than being tested independently. A direct test, e.g., a substrate-concentration dependence of switching frequency following Michaelis-Menten behaviour, or a mutant/inhibitor control that abolishes catalytic activity while retaining redox switching, would substantially strengthen the turnover assignment.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 4 caption] The GR conductance values are inconsistent between the main text and the caption: the text states G2 = 1.5 x 10^-4 G0 for GR, while the Fig. 4 caption gives 1.5 x 10^-5 G0. Please correct this discrepancy.
  2. [Equations (1) and (2)] Equations (1) and (2) are referenced in the text but are not explicitly numbered in the displayed layout; please number them clearly and define all variables (e.g., whether 'total protein trapping time' includes silent traces in Eq. (1) and only switching traces in Eq. (2), as implied).
  3. [Abstract and main text] The phrase 'exquisite agreement' (main text, Results section) is an overstatement given the broad kcat ranges and the lack of error bars; a more measured description of the comparison would be appropriate.
  4. [Fig. 5] The y-axis label '% of traces displaying conductance switching events' is clear, but the text describing the 5-7% residual as 'enzymatic events that do not lead to the enzymatic chemical conversion' is speculative; the residual could equally arise from non-enzymatic junction instability, and this should be acknowledged.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the switching-frequency comparison to literature kcat is an external benchmark, and self-citations support but do not force the central claim.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing comparison is between measured conductance-switching frequencies (Eqs. [1]-[2], Table 1) and independently reported kcat values from bulk assays (refs 22-27). That is an empirical benchmark, not an input to the measurement. The classification of blinks as silent/switching is made by a Python algorithm and HMM/GMM, independent of kcat. The background correction from inactive-condition switching (5-7%) is dimensionally opaque and the arithmetic is not transparent (the reported corrected values 1790 and 12871 min-1 do not obviously follow from subtracting 5-7% from 2573 and 16292 min-1), but the raw frequencies already fall within the cited kcat ranges, so the conclusion does not depend on that correction being fitted. The cited prior self-work (refs 7, 52) is used to support the redox-switching mechanism, but the identification of switching frequency with turnover is validated by the literature kcat comparison rather than by a self-referential derivation. No equation is defined in terms of the quantity it claims to predict, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The broad kcat ranges weaken the evidential value of the agreement, but that is a correctness/statistical concern, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on four interpretive assumptions: switching events equal catalytic turnovers or catalytic-state changes, the redox-gated sequential tunnelling mechanism explains the conductance jumps, the trapped object is a single active enzyme, and literature kcat values are the correct benchmark. None are machine-checked or reproduced with released data. The background switching fraction subtracted from active frequencies is the main empirical free parameter. No new entities are postulated; the tunnelling model is taken from prior literature.

free parameters (3)
  • Background switching fraction subtracted = 5-7% (measured in inactive conditions)
    Subtracted from active bulk frequencies in Table 1. If inactive switching is not purely non-productive catalysis, the corrected frequencies shift significantly and may leave the kcat ranges.
  • Blink classification threshold parameters = not disclosed (Supplementary Section 3)
    The Python algorithm separating silent vs switching blinks requires thresholds or model parameters; these are central to event counting but are not specified in the main text.
  • HMM/GMM model parameters = not disclosed
    Used to extract two conductance levels and switching frequencies; no parameter details are given in the main text, and no code is released.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Redox-gated sequential tunnelling mechanism explains conductance jumps
    Assumed to explain the observed two-level conductance changes; based on prior Kuznetsov-Ulstrup theory and EC-STM redox protein work, invoked in the 'Proposed mechanisms' section and Fig. 6.
  • domain assumption Each switching event corresponds to a catalytic turnover or catalytic-state change
    Central interpretative assumption; supported only by frequency comparison to bulk kcat and inactive controls, not by direct single-molecule product detection.
  • domain assumption The trapped entity is a single enzyme in a native-like active state
    Assumed from STM imaging, apparent sizes, and conductance values; surface adsorption and nanogap confinement could alter activity, though bulk surface electrocatalysis controls provide indirect support.
  • domain assumption Literature kcat values are valid benchmarks for comparison
    Used as ground truth to validate frequencies; the kcat ranges are broad and measured under different conditions from the nanogap environment.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Real-Time, Label-free Electrical Transduction of Catalytic Events in a Single-Protein Redox Enzymatic Junction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZPOWRWYS

@misc{pith2026250104589,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Real-Time, Label-free Electrical Transduction of Catalytic Events in a Single-Protein Redox Enzymatic Junction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZPOWRWYS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.04589}
}
read the original abstract

Single-enzyme catalysis offers a promising approach for unravelling the dynamic behaviour of individual enzymes as they undergo a reaction, revealing the complex heterogeneity that is lost in the averaged ensembles. Here we demonstrate real-time, label-free monitoring of the electrical transduction of single-protein enzymatic activity for two redox enzymes, cytochrome P450cam and glutathione reductase, trapped in an electrochemically controlled nanoscale tunnelling junction immersed in the aqueous enzymatic mixture. The conductance switching signal observed in individual transients of the electrical current flowing through the single-protein junction shows that the tunnelling conductance is modulated by the enzymatic reaction; subtle changes of the enzyme redox state occurring during the chemical catalysis process result in fluctuations of the enzyme junction conductivity, which are captured as a switching signal. At the applied electrochemical reducing potential for electrocatalysis, the transient oxidation of the trapped enzyme in every catalytic cycle opens an additional redox-mediated electron tunnelling channel in the single protein junction that results in a temporary current jump, contributing to the observed conductance switching features. The latter is experimentally assessed via electrochemically controlled conductance measurements of the single-protein junction. The statistical analysis of the switching events captured over long time periods results in average frequencies that correlate well with the reported catalytic turnover values of both enzymes obtained in standard bulk assays. The single-enzyme experiments reveal the acute heterogenous behaviour of enzymatic catalysis and the quantification of single enzyme turnover frequencies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    & Cassagnol, M

    Gilani, B. & Cassagnol, M. Biochemistry, Cytochrome P450. (2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    & Komai, T

    Tsujita, Y., Ikeda, M., Serizawa, N., Hishinuma, A. & Komai, T. Pravastatin sodium: new clinical aspects and recent progress. Annu. Per. Sankyo Res. Lab 49, 1–61 (1997)

    work page 1997

  3. [3]

    & Serizawa, N

    Watanabe, I., Nara, F. & Serizawa, N. Cloning, characterization and expression of the gene encoding cytochrome P450sca2 from Streptomyces carbophilus involved in production of pravastatin, a specific HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor. Gene 163, 81–85 (1995)

    work page 1995

  4. [4]

    Wang, H., Zhu, C. & Li, D. Visualizing enzyme catalytic process using single- molecule techniques. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 163, (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Zhang, B. et al. Engineering an Enzyme for Direct Electrical Monitoring of Activity. ACS Nano 14, 1360–1368 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Zhang, A. et al. Catalytic cycle of formate dehydrogenase captured by single-molecule conductance. Nat Catal 6, 266–275 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Ruiz, M. P. et al. Bioengineering a Single-Protein Junction. J Am Chem Soc 139, 15337–15346 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Fuller, C. W. et al. Molecular electronics sensors on a scalable semiconductor chip: A platform for single-molecule measurement of binding kinetics and enzyme activity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, (2022)

    work page 2022

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    Tao, N. J. Probing Potential-Tuned Resonant Tunneling through Redox Molecules with Scanning Tunneling Microscopy. Phys Rev Lett 76, 4066–4069 (1996). 16

    1996

  2. [10]

    Kuznetsov, A. M. & Ulstrup, J. Mechanisms of in Situ Scanning Tunnelling Microscopy of Organized Redox Molecular Assemblies. J Phys Chem A 105, 7494– 7494 (2001)

    2001

  3. [11]

    & Ulstrup, J

    Chi, Q., Farver, O. & Ulstrup, J. Long-range protein electron transfer observed at the single-molecule level: In situ mapping of redox-gated tunneling resonance. PNAS November 8, 16203–16208 (2005)

    2005

  4. [12]

    Electrochemical tunnelling sensors and their potential applications

    Albrecht, T. Electrochemical tunnelling sensors and their potential applications. Nat Commun 3, (2012)

    2012

  5. [13]

    & X Xie, S

    H Lu, P., Xun, L. & X Xie, S. Single-Molecule Enzymatic Dynamics. American Association for the Advancement of Science 1877–1882 (1998)

    1998

  6. [14]

    M., Stuehr, D

    He, Y., Haque, M. M., Stuehr, D. J., Lu, H. P. & Ignarro, L. J. Single-molecule spectroscopy reveals how calmodulin activates NO synthase by controlling its conformational fluctuation dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112, 11835–11840 (2015)

    2015

  7. [15]

    Wu, S. et al. Kinetics of the conformational cycle of Hsp70 reveals the importance of the dynamic and heterogeneous nature of Hsp70 for its function. National Academy of Sciences 117, 7814–7823 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    Pal, N., Wu, M. & Lu, H. P. Probing conformational dynamics of an enzymatic active site by an in situ single fluorogenic probe under piconewton force manipulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113, 15006–15011 (2016)

    2016

  9. [17]

    Guo, Q., He, Y. & Lu, H. P. Interrogating the activities of conformational deformed enzyme by single-molecule fluorescencemagnetic tweezers microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112, 13904–13909 (2015)

    2015

  10. [18]

    M., Pacholski, C

    Orosco, M. M., Pacholski, C. & Sailor, M. J. Real-time monitoring of enzyme activity in a mesoporous silicon double layer. Nat Nanotechnol 4, 255–258 (2009)

    2009

  11. [19]

    Sulistyaningdyah, W. T. et al. Hydroxylation activity of P450 BM-3 mutant F87V towards aromatic compounds and its application to the synthesis of hydroquinone derivatives from phenolic compounds. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 67, 556–562 (2005)

    2005

  12. [20]

    W., Meinhold, P., Glieder, A

    Peters, M. W., Meinhold, P., Glieder, A. & Arnold, F. H. Regio- and Enantioselective Alkane Hydroxylation with Engineered Cytochromes P450 BM-3. J Am Chem Soc 125, 13442–13450 (2003)

    2003

  13. [21]

    Guengerich, F. P. A history of the roles of cytochrome P450 enzymes in the toxicity of drugs. Toxicol Res 37, 1–23 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    K., England, P

    Allan, F. K., England, P. A. & Rouch, D. A. Protein engineering of cytochrome P450 cam (CYP101) for the oxidation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Protein Eng 13, 121–128 (2000)

    2000

  15. [23]

    M., Koo, L

    Purdy, M. M., Koo, L. S., Ortiz de Montellano, P. R. & Klinman, J. P. Steady-State Kinetic Investigation of Cytochrome P450cam: Interaction with Redox Partners and Reaction with Molecular Oxygen. Biochemistry 43, 271–281 (2004)

    2004

  16. [24]

    & Montellano, P

    Kim, D., Heo, Y.-S. & Montellano, P. R. O. de. Efficient catalytic turnover of cytochrome P450cam is supported by a T252N mutation. Arch Biochem Biophys 474, 150–156 (2008)

    2008

  17. [25]

    & Brandt, K

    Moroff, G. & Brandt, K. G. Yeast glutathione reductase Studies of the kinetics and stability of the enzyme as a function of pH and salt concentration. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Enzymology 410, 21–31 (1975)

    1975

  18. [26]

    WORTHINGTON, D. J. & ROSEMEYER, M. A. Glutathione Reductase from Human Erythrocytes: Catalytic Properties and Aggregation. Eur J Biochem 67, 231–238 (1976)

    1976

  19. [27]

    Bulger, J. E. & Brandt, K. G. Yeast Glutathione Reductase I. SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC AND KINETIC STUDIES OF ITS INTERACTION 17 WITH REDUCED NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE*. J Biol Chem 21, 5570 (1971)

    1971

  20. [28]

    Pensa, E. et al. New insight into the electrochemical desorption of alkanethiol SAMs on gold. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 14, 12355–12367 (2012)

    2012

  21. [29]

    Garg, K. et al. Shallow conductance decay along the heme array of a single tetraheme protein wire. Chem Sci (2024) doi:10.1039/d4sc01366b

    2024 doi

  22. [30]

    D., Zhang, J., Butt, J

    Gwyer, J. D., Zhang, J., Butt, J. N. & Ulstrup, J. Voltammetry and in situ scanning tunneling microscopy of cytochrome c nitrite reductase on Au(111) electrodes. Biophys J 91, 3897–3906 (2006)

    2006

  23. [31]

    Delia Pia, E. A. et al. Single-molecule mapping of long-range electron transport for a cytochrome b562 variant. Nano Lett 11, 176–182 (2011)

    2011

  24. [32]

    & Stimming, U

    Wang, M., Bugarski, S. & Stimming, U. Topological and electron-transfer properties of glucose oxidase adsorbed on highly oriented pyrolytic graphite electrodes. Journal of Physical Chemistry C 112, 5165–5173 (2008)

    2008

  25. [33]

    M., Díez-Pérez, I

    Artés, J. M., Díez-Pérez, I. & Gorostiza, P. Transistor-like behavior of single metalloprotein junctions. Nano Lett 12, 2679–2684 (2012)

    2012

  26. [34]

    & Liu, S

    Shangguan, L., Zhao, Y., Mi, L., Jiang, L. & Liu, S. Direct electrochemistry and electrocatalysis of cytochrome P450s immobilized on gold/graphene-based nanocomposites. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 772, 46–51 (2016)

    2016

  27. [35]

    V., Kuzikov, A

    Shumyantseva, V. V., Kuzikov, A. V., Masamrekh, R. A., Bulko, T. V. & Archakov, A. I. From electrochemistry to enzyme kinetics of cytochrome P450. Biosens Bioelectron 121, 192–204 (2018)

    2018

  28. [36]

    Kazlauskaite, J., Westlake, Andrew. C. G., Wong, L.-L. & Hill, H. A. O. Direct electrochemistry of cytochrome P450cam. Chemical Communications 2189–2190 (1996)

    1996

  29. [37]

    Martinis, S. A. et al. Probing the Heme Iron Coordination Structure of Pressure- Induced Cytochrome P420 cam. Biochemistry 35, 14530–14536 (1996)

    1996

  30. [38]

    Sligar, S. G. & Gunsalus, I. C. A thermodynamic model of regulation: Modulation of redox equilibria in camphor monoxygenase (biochemical regulation/free energy/redox potentials/cytochrome P-450 monoxygenase). PNAS 73, 1078–1082 (1976)

    1976

  31. [39]

    C., Lipscomb, J

    Gunsalus, I. C., Lipscomb, J. D. & Meeks, J. R. Cytochrome P450cam Substrate and effector interactions. Ann N Y Acad Sci 212, 107–121 (1973)

    1973

  32. [40]

    Schenkman, B. J. & Ingela, J. Spectral Analyses of Cytochromes P450.Pdf. Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents (1998)

    1998

  33. [41]

    A., Nicholson, J

    Koomson, D. A., Nicholson, J. H., Brogan, A. P. S. & Aldous, L. Re-assessing viologens for modern bio-electrocatalysis. Chem Sci 15, 9325–9332 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    & Kasher, R

    Willner, I., Katz, E., Riklin, A. & Kasher, R. Mediated Electron-Transfer in Glutathione-Reductase Organized in Self-Assembled Monolayers on Au Electrodes. J Am Chem Soc 114, 10965–10966 (1992)

    1992

  35. [43]

    Llobell, A., Fernandez, V. M. & López-Barea, J. Electron Transfer between Reduced Methyl Viologen and Oxidized Glutathione: A New Assay of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Glutathione Reductase’. Arch Biochem Biophys 250, 373–381 (1986)

    1986

  36. [44]

    Buckingham, M. et al. Electrochemically Driven C−H Hydrogen Abstraction Processes with the Tetrachloro‐Phthalimido‐N‐Oxyl (Cl4PINO) Catalyst. Electroanalysis 30, (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    H., Sadeghi, S

    Mak, L. H., Sadeghi, S. J., Fantuzzi, A. & Gilardi, G. Control of human cytochrome P450 2E1 electrocatalytic response as a result of unique orientation on gold electrodes. Anal Chem 82, 5357–5362 (2010). 18

    2010

  38. [46]

    Morin, J. A. et al. Mechano-chemical kinetics of DNA replication: identification of the translocation step of a replicative DNA polymerase. Nucleic Acids Res 43, 3643–3652 (2015)

    2015

  39. [47]

    & Grimson, W

    Stauffer, C. & Grimson, W. E. L. Adaptive background mixture models for real-time tracking. Proceedings. 1999 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Cat. No PR00149) 246–252 (1999) doi:10.1109/CVPR.1999.784637

    1999

  40. [48]

    Rabiner, L. R. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE 77, 257–286 (1989)

    1989

  41. [49]

    C., Cherayil, B

    Kou, S. C., Cherayil, B. J., Min, W., English, B. P. & Xie, X. S. Single-molecule Michaelis - Menten equations. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 109, 19068–19081 (2005)

    2005

  42. [50]

    & Mikhailov, A

    Lerch, H.-P., Rigler, R. & Mikhailov, A. S. Functional Conformational Motions in the Turnover Cycle of Cholesterol Oxidase. www.pnas.orgcgidoi10.1073pnas.0504995102 (2024)

    2024

  43. [51]

    Zheng, Y. et al. Absorption-Based Rapid Acquisition of Single-Molecule Kinetics from Unstable Enzymes in Microdroplets. Small (2024) doi:10.1002/smll.202309463

    2024 doi

  44. [52]

    M., Lõpez-Martínez, M., Díez-Pérez, I., Sanz, F

    Artés, J. M., Lõpez-Martínez, M., Díez-Pérez, I., Sanz, F. & Gorostiza, P. Conductance switching in single wired redox proteins. Small 10, 2537–2541 (2014)

    2014

  45. [53]

    S., Christensen, H

    Chi, Q., Zhang, J., Jensen, P. S., Christensen, H. E. M. & Ulstrup, J. Long-range interfacial electron transfer of metalloproteins based on molecular wiring assemblies. Faraday Discuss. 131, 181–195 (2006)

    2006

  46. [54]

    Yan, J. et al. Voltammetry and Single-Molecule In Situ Scanning Tunnelling Microscopy of the Redox Metalloenzyme Human Sulfite Oxidase. ChemElectroChem 8, 164–171 (2021)

    2021

  47. [55]

    Futera, Z. et al. Coherent Electron Transport across a 3 nm Bioelectronic Junction Made of Multi-Heme Proteins. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 11, 9766–9774 (2020)

    2020

  48. [56]

    Kayser, B. et al. Solid-State Electron Transport via the Protein Azurin is Temperature- Independent down to 4 K. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 11, 144–151 (2020)

    2020

  49. [57]

    & Lindsay, S

    Zhang, B., Song, W., Brown, J., Nemanich, R. & Lindsay, S. Electronic Conductance Resonance in Non-Redox-Active Proteins. J Am Chem Soc 142, 6432–6438 (2020)

    2020

  50. [58]

    Ubiquitous Electron Transport in non-Electron Transfer Proteins

    Lindsay, S. Ubiquitous Electron Transport in non-Electron Transfer Proteins. 1–12 (2020)

    2020

  51. [59]

    M., Nikfarjam, A

    Hashemi, M. M., Nikfarjam, A. & Raji, H. Novel fabrication of extremely high aspect ratio and straight nanogap and array nanogap electrodes. Microsystem Technologies 25, 541–549 (2019)

    2019

  52. [60]

    Li, Y. et al. Transition from stochastic events to deterministic ensemble average in electron transfer reactions revealed by single-molecule conductance measurement. PNAS 116, 3407-3412 (2019)

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.