Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 69 references

Local predictors of explosive synchronization with ordinal methods

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that hub-node ordinal pattern transition entropy rises before explosive synchronization transitions across Kuramoto, Chialvo-map, Rössler, and experimental circuit networks, outperforming classic early-warning signals.

desk verdict Plausible sentinel-node warning for explosive synchronization, but the paper hasn't shown it's sensing the transition rather than the coupling itself. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.05202 v1 pith:Z6AMSHQL submitted 2025-01-09 nlin.CD physics.data-an

I. Leyva , Juan A. Almendral , Christophe Letellier , I. Sendiña-Nadal This is my paper · ORCID
classification nlin.CDphysics.data-an
keywords explosivesynchronizationordinalpatterntransitionentropyearlywarningsignalssentinelnodespermutationcomplexnetworkscriticaltransitionschaoticoscillators
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Explosive synchronization is hard to foresee because the collective order parameter stays nearly flat until the jump. This paper proposes a local, cheaply computable observable — the ordinal pattern transition (OPT) entropy of a single node's time series — as an early warning. The central claim is that at high-degree hub nodes this entropy rises well before the synchronization threshold, across networks of Kuramoto phase oscillators, Chialvo maps, chaotic Rössler oscillators, and an experimental star of electronic circuits. The paper reports that the hub's OPT entropy outperforms standard early-warning signals such as autocorrelation and fluctuation variance, whose hub response can peak at the wrong (backward) transition. If correct, an alarm could be raised by watching only a few sentinel high-degree nodes, without reconstructing a global order parameter.

What carries the argument

The central object is the ordinal pattern transition (OPT) entropy $H_T$, defined from a node's scalar time series by first mapping blocks of $D=3$ successive values to ordinal patterns (the relative order of the three values), then building the $D!\times D!$ (here $6\times6$) transition matrix $p_{\ell m}$ of probabilities that pattern $m$ follows pattern $\ell$. Each pattern's normalized Shannon entropy $H_{\pi_\ell}$ is averaged over patterns to give $H_T$, a global measure of how unpredictable the temporal ordering is. The load-bearing idea is that $H_T$ is a local observable that changes smoothly and early at hubs because their high connectivity exposes them to frequency-beat and collective effects, while low-degree nodes remain essentially local; comparing $H_T$ across degree classes $\langle H_T\rangle_k$ converts a one-node time series into a sentinel-ranking map for the imminent transition. The same machinery is fed by whichever scalar is convenient: instantaneous frequency, spike maxima (Chialvo), Poincaré-section minima (Rössler), or voltage maxima (circuits).

What would settle it

Decisive test: in the same $N=31$ Kuramoto star, replace leaf natural frequencies by independent noise so no synchronization transition exists, and check whether the hub's $H_T$ still rises with coupling; if it does, the hub rise is a local beat/coupling effect rather than an early-warning precursor.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the degree-averaged ordinal pattern transition entropy $\langle H_T\rangle_k$ computed at central nodes acts as a local precursor of explosive synchronization. For $D=3$ ordinal patterns, $H_T$ is the mean over patterns of the Shannon entropy of the distribution of the pattern that follows each pattern in the node's time series. In a $N=31$ Kuramoto star the hub's $H_T$ already rises at coupling values about one third of the forward critical value, while leaf nodes stay flat and the order parameter $R$ does not move. The same hierarchy holds for Chialvo maps in star and scale-free topologies and for chaotic Rössler oscillators, where only degree classes above a cutoff $k_c$ become sensitive; in a six-node experimental circuit star the hub's normalized $H_T$ increases by up to a factor of five before the explosive transition while leaves do not. The paper concludes that OPT entropy can identify subtle signals of the proximity of the transitions across diverse network configurations and dynamical regimes, outperforming traditional early-warning signals.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the rise in a hub's OPT entropy is a signature of the approaching collective transition rather than a local by-product of the hub's own frequency beat growing with coupling; if the local effect dominates, the method tracks coupling strength instead of warning of explosive synchronization.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Monitoring only the hub's OPT entropy gives an alarm at coupling values roughly one-third of the explosive synchronization threshold in the Kuramoto star, with no need for the global order parameter $R$.
  • The indicator transfers across model families — phase oscillators, neuronal maps, chaotic flows — and to noisy experimental circuit data, so it does not depend on a particular equation of motion.
  • In scale-free networks, nodes above a degree cutoff $k_c$ behave as sentinels; selecting high-degree classes defines a small monitoring set for real systems.
  • OPT entropy outperforms the standard early-warning indicators tested here: 1-lag autocorrelation is comparable to plain permutation entropy at the hub, while fluctuation variance $\sigma_f$ peaks near the backward (desynchronization) transition, which would raise a false alarm for the forward explosive transition.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because $H_T$ needs only one scalar observable and no phase reconstruction, a natural next test is the same hub-entropy alarm for other abrupt transitions — percolation, cascading failures, or regime shifts — where an order parameter also stays flat until collapse.
  • Separating the hub's $H_T$ rise into a collective-criticality component and a local beat/coupling component (which the paper does not do) would decide whether the method warns of the transition or simply tracks coupling; one way is to drive the leaves by noise so no synchronization occurs and see whether the hub rise persists.
  • The degree-cutoff result suggests node degree may be a sufficient proxy for sentinel selection in these systems, but it leaves open whether richer centrality measures would identify even earlier sensors in networks that are not degree-heterogeneous.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes using ordinal pattern transition (OPT) entropy HT, defined in Eq. (5) and averaged over degree classes in Eq. (6), as a local early warning signal for explosive synchronization in networks. The authors test this measure on Kuramoto phase oscillators in a star network, Chialvo maps in star and scale-free networks, Rössler oscillators in star and scale-free networks, and an experimental network of six chaotic electronic circuits. The central empirical claim is that HT measured at high-degree hub nodes rises noticeably while the order parameter R is still near zero, and that this rise occurs earlier and more clearly than for leaves, with HT outperforming traditional EWS such as lag-1 autocorrelation and fluctuation variance. The paper concludes that OPT entropy can identify subtle precursors of explosive transitions across diverse dynamical regimes and even surpass traditional EWS.

Significance. If the central claim is sound, the paper offers a conceptually simple, local, and computationally cheap predictor for explosive synchronization, with the appealing property that it requires no parameter fitted to the transition and can be computed from single-node time series. The multi-system scope, including maps, flows, and an experimental circuit network, is a genuine strength, and the authors are explicit that the measure is most effective at sentinel hub nodes. However, the headline claim of outperforming traditional EWS currently rests on a single quantitative comparison without error bars, and the mechanistic origin of the hub HT rise is not fully isolated from a local coupling effect. These issues are addressable, and with the proposed controls the paper would be a useful contribution to the early-warning-signals literature.

major comments (3)
  1. [III A, Fig. 1] The central evidence that HT is a precursor of the forward explosive transition is not yet distinguished from a local coupling artifact. For the Kuramoto hub, Eq. (9) gives \omega_h(t) = \omega_{o,h} + d \sum_l \sin(\theta_l - \theta_h), so the hub time series contains a coupling-induced modulation whose amplitude grows linearly with d even when the leaves are mutually independent and R is essentially zero. The paper itself notes in Fig. 1(b) that the hub fluctuation variance \sigma_f grows linearly with d because of the frequency-beat amplitude and peaks near the backward transition, calling that a false alarm. Since HT in Fig. 1(a) is computed from the same instantaneous-frequency series, the observed HT rise could be the same local driving effect rather than a signature of the approaching collective threshold. I request a control experiment with one-way coupling (leaves evolving independently and the hub receiving their frozen signals), or an explicit decomposition of HT into a collective-criticality component and a local-driving component; without one of these, the early-warning interpretation is not established.
  2. [Abstract and Conclusions; Fig. 1] The claim that OPT entropy outperforms traditional EWS is supported by exactly one quantitative comparison, Fig. 1, for one Kuramoto star configuration, with results averaged over ten instances but no error bars or statistical test. The comparison also conflates tasks: \sigma_f's peak near the backward transition is described as a false alarm, but a fair EWS comparison should be phrased in terms of detection performance, such as advance time versus false-alarm rate, or sensitivity/specificity over an ensemble. The Chialvo, R\"ossler, and experimental figures (Figs. 2, 3, 4) show the qualitative HT rise but do not compare against AC(1) or \sigma_f, and Fig. 4 has no repeated-trial information. Please provide quantitative EWS comparisons with confidence intervals across systems, or soften the abstract and conclusions accordingly.
  3. [II B, Eq. (8)] The definition of the normalized autocorrelation in Eq. (8) is not the standard autocorrelation: it omits subtraction of the mean from x_t and x_{t+l}, and the denominator uses raw second moments rather than variances around the mean. Because AC(1) is one of the two traditional EWS used in the Fig. 1 comparison, this definitional issue directly affects the quantitative claim. Please use the centered autocorrelation \sum_t (x_t-\mu)(x_{t+l}-\mu)/\sum_t (x_t-\mu)^2, or justify the uncentered variant explicitly and state it as such in the main text.
minor comments (5)
  1. [II A, Eq. (2)] There is a typo in the text near Eq. (2): "Shanon entropy" should read "Shannon entropy."
  2. [Fig. 3 caption and axes] In Fig. 3(c), the axis labels "d=0:08"10!3" and "d=0:6"10!3" appear as corrupted LaTeX; they should read d = 0.08 \times 10^{-3} and d = 0.6 \times 10^{-3}. Also, the caption says "OTP entropy" but should say "OPT entropy."
  3. [II A, first paragraph] The paper fixes T = 2000 and D = 3 in the methods, but Fig. 1 states that the input is a \tau = 200 periodic sampling of the instantaneous frequency; please clarify the resulting number of ordinal blocks, whether a sliding window or a single long series is used, and how stationarity is handled, so that the entropy estimates are reproducible.
  4. [II B, Eq. (6)] The notation \langle HT \rangle_k could be read as an ensemble average; please state explicitly that it is an average over all nodes with degree k, to avoid confusion with the time average in Eq. (7).
  5. [III D] In the experimental section, the sentence "in the experiment, this role is assigned to x" could be interpreted ambiguously; please specify that the experimental observable is the circuit voltage corresponding to the R\"ossler x variable, not the Chialvo map variable x_t.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: hub OPT entropy is computed from local ordinal transitions with no fitted parameters, and its rise before R is shown directly in simulations and circuit data.

full rationale

HT (Eq. 5) is defined from the node's own ordinal transition matrix, while the order parameter R (Eq. 7) is a global phase-coherence average; no parameter of HT is fitted to R or to the forward transition threshold. The central evidence is direct: Figs. 1-4 report HT for hub/leaf degree classes alongside R for Kuramoto, Chialvo, Rössler and experimental circuit networks, with no inversion or calibration. The paper's self-citations [38,47] motivate ordinal centrality, but the current numerical and experimental results carry the claim independently. The explicitly named 'false alarm' of sigma_f near the backward transition is a negative control, not a circular step. The possible local-coupling origin of the hub HT rise (Eq. 9 contains d*sum sin(theta_l - theta_h) in the hub's instantaneous frequency) is a competing-mechanism or correctness concern, not an equivalence-by-construction. No equation makes the predictor identical to the target, no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no self-citation or uniqueness theorem forces the conclusion. Hence the derivation chain is self-contained; only minor, non-load-bearing self-citations are present.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on hand-chosen parameters that create the explosive-synchronization regime, on the assumption that short scalar time series faithfully capture the hub's approach to criticality, and on finite-sample convergence of ordinal statistics. No new physical entity is introduced. The predictive indicator is independent of the order parameter by construction, so the ledger is dominated by tunable regime parameters rather than fitted prediction parameters.

free parameters (5)
  • Kuramoto hub natural frequency omega_o,h = 1.3
    Set to create the frequency-degree correlation that produces explosive synchronization in the star network; not fitted to the predictor, but the ES regime and hysteresis depend on it.
  • Kuramoto leaf frequency spread = 1 + 0.005 epsilon, epsilon uniform in [0,1]
    Small random detuning added to leaves; determines leaf-hub frequency separation and the bistable window.
  • Chialvo current bias slope alpha = 3e-5 (star: I_hub=0.05, I_leaf=0.049+1e-4 epsilon; SF: I(k)=0.049+alpha k)
    Linear I-degree correlation imposed to induce explosive synchronization; controls the frequency gradient across degrees.
  • Rössler frequency-degree slope alpha = 2.73e-4 with omega_i(k)=1.06+alpha k
    Sets the frequency-degree correlation that produces ES; strength of heterogeneity controls the width of the hysteresis window.
  • Ordinal pattern length D, time series length T, and sampling lag tau = D=3, T=2000; tau=200 integration steps for Kuramoto
    Chosen for reliable ordinal statistics, but D=3 has only 6 patterns, so HT is coarse, and the transition matrix may be under-sampled for short series.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Finite-sample ordinal pattern probabilities p(pi_l) converge to the true symbolic dynamics; L = floor(T/(tau D)) with T=2000 and D=3 gives reliable estimates of the 6x6 transition matrix.
    Stated in Sec. II A: 'the time series has to be sufficiently long, L >> D!'; no convergence check or confidence intervals are provided.
  • domain assumption The one-dimensional observables (instantaneous frequency, spike maxima, Poincaré minima, voltage maxima) faithfully represent each node's dynamics relevant to synchronization.
    Entropy is computed on these scalar series; if the observable misses the collective coupling effects, HT cannot anticipate the transition.
  • domain assumption The degree-frequency correlations used (omega_o,h=1.3, I_i=0.049+alpha k, omega_i(k)=1.06+alpha k) induce explosive synchronization of the same type in each system.
    Imported from prior ES literature (refs [41,59-61]) and not independently verified here; the predictive claim is tested only inside this regime.
  • standard math Standard Shannon entropy and column-stochastic matrix properties of the ordinal transition matrix.
    Underpins Eqs. (1)-(5); no proof needed but it is a background assumption for HT.
  • domain assumption The electronic circuits in Ref [61] behave as piecewise Rössler systems with the same phase-coherent chaotic dynamics as the numerical model.
    The experiment is taken from earlier work; the present paper does not provide the data or circuit verification.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Local predictors of explosive synchronization with ordinal methods." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Z6AMSHQL

@misc{pith2026250105202,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Local predictors of explosive synchronization with ordinal methods},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Z6AMSHQL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.05202}
}
read the original abstract

We propose to use the ordinal pattern transition (OPT) entropy measured at sentinel central nodes as a potential predictor of explosive transitions to synchronization in networks of various dynamical systems with increasing complexity. Our results demonstrate that the OPT entropic measure surpasses traditional early warning signals (EWS) measures and could be valuable to the tools available for predicting critical transitions. In particular, we investigate networks of diffusively coupled phase oscillators and chaotic R\"ossler systems. As maps, we consider a neural network of Chialvo maps coupled in star and scale-free configurations. Furthermore, we apply this measure to time series data obtained from a network of electronic circuits operating in the chaotic regime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.05202 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Abrupt synchronization transition in Kuramoto phase [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Anticipating abrupt synchronization in networks of coupled Chialvo maps. Time series for (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Predicting explosive transitions in networks of R¨ossler oscillators. (a,b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Normalized ordinal pattern transition entropies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , p(πD!)), the Bandt-Pompe’s per- mutation entropy is the corresponding Shannon entropy evaluated as S[P ] = − D!X ℓ=1 pℓ ln pℓ, (1) with the criterion 0 0 = 1

    Ordinal permutation entropy Given the D-order permutation probability distribu- tion P = ( p(π1), . . . , p(πD!)), the Bandt-Pompe’s per- mutation entropy is the corresponding Shannon entropy evaluated as S[P ] = − D!X ℓ=1 pℓ ln pℓ, (1) with the criterion 0 0 = 1. We define a normalized per- mutation entropy as H[P ] = S Smax (2) where Smax is the Shanon ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    10!3 d=0:6

    Ordinal permutation transition entropy While the previous entropy measure is solely based on the appearance of permutation patterns, transitions be- tween patterns may reveal information about the finer temporal organization of a dynamical system [56]. We define the ordinal transition probability matrix OT := (pℓm) as pℓm = #(πℓ, πm) #(πℓ) (3) being pℓm t...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Scheffer, J

    M. Scheffer, J. Bascompte, W. A. Brock, V. Brovkin, S. R. Carpenter, V. Dakos, H. Held, E. H. V. Nes, M. Ri- etkerk, and G. Sugihara, Early-warning signals for critical transitions, Nature 461, 53 (2009)

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    Scheffer, S

    M. Scheffer, S. R. Carpenter, T. M. Lenton, J. Bas- compte, W. Brock, V. Dakos, J. van de Koppel, I. A. van de Leemput, S. A. Levin, E. H. van Nes, M. Pascual, and J. Vandermeer, Anticipating critical transitions, Sci- ence 338, 344 (2012)

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    Kuhlmann, K

    L. Kuhlmann, K. Lehnertz, M. P. Richardson, B. Schel- ter, and H. P. Zaveri, Seizure prediction — ready for a new era, Nature Reviews Neurology 14, 618 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    M. K. Kim, R. E. Harris, A. F. DaSilva, and U. C. Lee, Explosive synchronization-based brain modulation reduces hypersensitivity in the brain network: A compu- tational model study, Frontiers in Computational Neuro- science 16, 10.3389/fncom.2022.815099 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    Costa, C

    G. Costa, C. Teixeira, and M. F. Pinto, Comparison be- tween epileptic seizure prediction and forecasting based on machine learning, Scientific Reports 14, 5653 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    V. N. Livina and T. M. Lenton, A modified method for detecting incipient bifurcations in a dynamical system, Geophysical Research Letters 34, L03712 (2007)

    work page 2007

Show all 69 references
  1. [9]

    T. M. Lenton, H. Held, E. Kriegler, J. W. Hall, W. Lucht, S. Rahmstorf, and H. J. Schellnhuber, Tipping elements in the Earth’s climate system, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences 105, 1786 (2008)

    2008

  2. [10]

    Lenton, Early warning of climate tipping points, Na- ture Climate Change 1, 201 (2011)

    T. Lenton, Early warning of climate tipping points, Na- ture Climate Change 1, 201 (2011)

    2011

  3. [11]

    J. C. Moore, Predicting tipping points in complex envi- ronmental systems, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, 635 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    S. V. George, S. Kachhara, and G. Ambika, Early warn- ing signals for critical transitions in complex systems, Physica Scripta 98, 072002 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    A. C. Patterson, A. G. Strang, and K. C. Abbott, When and where we can expect to see early warning signals in multispecies systems approaching tipping points: In- sights from theory, American Naturalist198, E12 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    Tirabassi and C

    G. Tirabassi and C. Masoller, Correlation lags give early warning signals of approaching bifurcations, Chaos, Soli- tons & Fractals155, 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111720 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    Sardany´ es, F

    J. Sardany´ es, F. Ivanˇ ci´ c, and B. Vidiella, Identifying regime shifts, transients and late warning signals for 8 proactive ecosystem management, Biological Conserva- tion 290, 110433 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    Evers, D

    K. Evers, D. Borsboom, E. I. Fried, F. Hasselman, and L. Waldorp, Early warning signals of complex critical transitions in deterministic dynamics, Nonlinear Dynam- ics 112, 19071 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Kalitzin, G

    S. Kalitzin, G. Petkov, P. Suffczynski, V. Grigorovsky, B. L. Bardakjian, F. L. D. Silva, and P. L. Carlen, Epilepsy as a manifestation of a multistate network of oscillatory systems, Neurobiology of Disease , 104488 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    V. P. Vera- ´Avila, J. R. Sevilla-Escoboza, and I. Leyva, Complex networks exhibit intermittent synchronization, Chaos 30, 103119 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    Tirabassi, Linear theory of the spatial signatures of critical slowing down, Physical Review Research 6, 023228 (2024)

    G. Tirabassi, Linear theory of the spatial signatures of critical slowing down, Physical Review Research 6, 023228 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Papo and J

    D. Papo and J. Buld´ u, Does the brain behave like a (com- plex) network? i. dynamics, Physics of Life Reviews 48, 47 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    A. E. Motter, S. A. Myers, M. Anghel, and T. Nishikawa, Spontaneous synchrony in power-grid networks, Nature Physics 9, 191 (2013)

    2013

  14. [22]

    Aparicio, J

    A. Aparicio, J. X. Velasco-Hern´ andez, C. H. Moog, Y.- Y. Liu, and M. T. Angulo, Structure-based identifica- tion of sensor species for anticipating critical transitions, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2104732118 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    H. Fan, L. W. Kong, Y. C. Lai, and X. Wang, Antici- pating synchronization with machine learning, Physical Review Research 3, 023237 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    Masuda, K

    N. Masuda, K. Aihara, and N. G. MacLaren, Anticipat- ing regime shifts by mixing early warning signals from different nodes, Nature Communications15, 1086 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    N. G. MacLaren, P. Kundu, and N. Masuda, Early warn- ings for multi-stage transitions in dynamics on networks, Journal of the Royal Society Interface 20, 20220743 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    Ehstand, R

    N. Ehstand, R. V. Donner, C. L´ opez, and E. Hern´ andez- Garc ´ ıa, Network percolation provides early warnings of abrupt changes in coupled oscillatory systems: An explanatory analysis, Physical Review E 108, 054207 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    N. G. MacLaren, K. Aihara, and N. Masuda, Applicabil- ity of spatial early warning signals to complex network dynamics (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    T. M. Bury, R. I. Sujith, I. Pavithran, M. Scheffer, T. M. Lenton, M. Anand, and C. T. Bauch, Deep learning for early warning signals of tipping points, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2106140118 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    L. W. Kong, H. W. Fan, C. Grebogi, and Y. C. Lai, Ma- chine learning prediction of critical transition and system collapse, Physical Review Research 3, 013090 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    Vishnoi, V

    N. Vishnoi, V. Gupta, A. Saurabh, and L. Kabiraj, Reli- ability of early warning indicators of critical transition in stochastic van der pol oscillators with additive correlated noise, Nonlinear Dynamics 112, 15193 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    J. P. Tarigo, C. Stari, C. Masoller, and A. C. Mart ´ ı, Basin entropy as an indicator of a bifurcation in a time-delayed system, Chaos 34, 053113 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Bassi, R

    H. Bassi, R. P. Yim, J. Vendrow, R. Koduluka, C. Zhu, and H. Lyu, Learning to predict synchronization of cou- pled oscillators on randomly generated graphs, Scientific Reports 12, 15056 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    R. Ma, Q. Dai, H. Li, and J. Yang, Dynamics reconstruc- tion in the presence of bistability by using reservoir com- puter, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 172, 113523 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Zhang, H

    H. Zhang, H. Fan, Y. Du, L. Wang, and X. Wang, Antic- ipating measure synchronization in coupled hamiltonian systems with machine learning, Chaos 32, 083136 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    Z. Liu, X. Zhang, X. Ru, T.-T. Gao, J. M. Moore, and G. Yan, Early predictor for the onset of critical transi- tions in networked dynamical systems, Physical Review X 14, 031009 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    M. Roy, A. Senapati, S. Poria, A. Mishra, and C. Hens, Role of assortativity in predicting burst synchronization using echo state network, Physical Review E105, 064205 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    Shahriari, S

    Z. Shahriari, S. D. Algar, D. M. Walker, and M. Small, Ordinal poincar´ e sections: Reconstructing the first re- turn map from an ordinal segmentation of time series, Chaos 33, 053109 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    Leyva and C

    I. Leyva and C. Masoller, Inferring the connectivity of coupled oscillators and anticipating their transition to synchrony through lag-time analysis, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 133, 109604 (2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    Leyva, J

    I. Leyva, J. H. Mart ´ ınez, C. Masoller, O. A. Rosso, and M. Zanin, 20 years of ordinal patterns: Perspectives and challenges, Europhysics Letters 138, 31001 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    J. A. Almendral, I. Leyva, and I. Sendi˜ na-Nadal, Unveil- ing the connectivity of complex networks using ordinal transition methods, Entropy 25, 1079 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    Tirabassi and C

    G. Tirabassi and C. Masoller, Entropy-based early de- tection of critical transitions in spatial vegetation fields, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120, e2215667120 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    Lehnertz, Ordinal methods for a characterization of evolving functional brain networks, Chaos 33, 022101 (2023)

    K. Lehnertz, Ordinal methods for a characterization of evolving functional brain networks, Chaos 33, 022101 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Boccaletti, J

    S. Boccaletti, J. Almendral, S. Guan, I. Leyva, Z. Liu, I. Sendi˜ na-Nadal, Z. Wang, and Y. Zou, Explosive tran- sitions in complex networks’ structure and dynamics: Percolation and synchronization, Physics Reports 660, 1 (2016)

    2016

  36. [44]

    Avalos-Gayt´ an, J

    V. Avalos-Gayt´ an, J. A. Almendral, I. Leyva, F. Battis- ton, V. Nicosia, V. Latora, and S. Boccaletti, Emergent explosive synchronization in adaptive complex networks, Physical Review E 97, 042301 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    Soriano-Pa˜ nos, Q

    D. Soriano-Pa˜ nos, Q. Guo, V. Latora, and J. G´ omez- Garde˜ nes, Explosive transitions induced by interdepen- dent contagion-consensus dynamics in multiplex net- works, Physical Review E 99, 062311 (2019)

    2019

  38. [46]

    Khalil, I

    N. Khalil, I. Leyva, J. A. Almendral, and I. Sendi˜ na Nadal, Deterministic and stochastic cooperation transi- tions in evolutionary games on networks, Physical Review E 107, 054302 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    Ranjan and S

    A. Ranjan and S. R. Gandhi, Propagation of transient explosive synchronization in a mesoscale mouse brain network model of epilepsy, Network Neuroscience 8, 883 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    B. K. Rahjerdi, R. Ramamoorthy, F. Nazarimehr, K. Ra- jagopal, and S. Jafari, Indicating the synchronization bi- furcation points using the early warning signals in two case studies: Continuous and explosive synchronization, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 164, 112656 (2022)

    2022

  41. [49]

    Tlaie, I

    A. Tlaie, I. Leyva, R. Sevilla-Escoboza, V. P. Vera-Avila, and I. Sendi˜ na Nadal, Dynamical complexity as a proxy 9 for the network degree distribution, Physical Review E 99, 012310 (2019)

    2019

  42. [50]

    Bandt and B

    C. Bandt and B. Pompe, Permutation entropy: A natu- ral complexity measure for time series, Physical Review Letters 88, 174102 (2002)

    2002

  43. [51]

    McCullough, M

    M. McCullough, M. Small, T. Stemler, H. Ho, C. Iu, and H. H. C. Iu, Time lagged ordinal partition networks for capturing dynamics of continuous dynamical systems, Chaos 25, 53101 (2015)

    2015

  44. [52]

    Zanin and F

    M. Zanin and F. Olivares, Ordinal patterns-based methodologies for distinguishing chaos from noise in dis- crete time series, Communications Physics 4, 190 (2021)

    2021

  45. [53]

    Zunino, M

    L. Zunino, M. C. Soriano, I. Fischer, O. A. Rosso, and C. R. Mirasso, Permutation-information-theory approach to unveil delay dynamics from time-series analysis, Phys- ical Review E 82, 046212 (2010)

    2010

  46. [54]

    M. C. Soriano, L. Zunino, O. A. Rosso, I. Fischer, and C. R. Mirasso, Time scales of a chaotic semiconductor laser with optical feedback under the lens of a permu- tation information analysis, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 47, 252 (2011)

    2011

  47. [55]

    De Micco, J

    L. De Micco, J. G. Fern´ andez, H. A. Larrondo, A. Plas- tino, and O. A. Rosso, Sampling period, statistical com- plexity, and chaotic attractors, Physica A: Statistical Me- chanics and its Applications 391, 2564 (2012)

    2012

  48. [56]

    A. M. Chrisment and M.-C. Firpo, Entropy–complexity analysis in some globally-coupled systems, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 460, 162 (2016)

    2016

  49. [57]

    Letellier, Estimating the Shannon entropy: Recur- rence plots versus symbolic dynamics, Physical Review Letters 96, 254102 (2006)

    C. Letellier, Estimating the Shannon entropy: Recur- rence plots versus symbolic dynamics, Physical Review Letters 96, 254102 (2006)

    2006

  50. [58]

    Small, Complex networks from time series: Captur- ing dynamics, in 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) (2013) pp

    M. Small, Complex networks from time series: Captur- ing dynamics, in 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) (2013) pp. 2509–2512

    2013

  51. [59]

    Masoller, Y

    C. Masoller, Y. Hong, S. Ayad, F. Gustave, S. Barland, A. J. Pons, S. G´ omez, and A. Arenas, Quantifying sudden changes in dynamical systems using symbolic networks, New Journal of Physics 17, 023068 (2015)

    2015

  52. [60]

    McCullough, M

    M. McCullough, M. Small, H. H. C. Iu, and T. Stem- ler, Multiscale ordinal network analysis of human cardiac dynamics, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Soci- ety A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 375, 20160292 (2017)

    2017

  53. [61]

    Leyva, A

    I. Leyva, A. Navas, I. Sendina-Nadal, J. Almendral, J. Buld´ u, M. Zanin, D. Papo, and S. Boccaletti, Explo- sive transitions to synchronization in networks of phase oscillators, Scientific Reports 3, 1281 (2013)

    2013

  54. [62]

    G´ omez-Gardenes, S

    J. G´ omez-Gardenes, S. G´ omez, A. Arenas, and Y. Moreno, Explosive synchronization transitions in scale-free networks, Physical Review Letters 106, 128701 (2011)

    2011

  55. [63]

    Leyva, R

    I. Leyva, R. Sevilla-Escoboza, J. M. Buld´ u, I. Sendi˜ na Nadal, J. G´ omez-Garde˜ nes, A. Arenas, Y. Moreno, S. G´ omez, R. Jaimes-Re´ ategui, and S. Boccaletti, Ex- plosive first-order transition to synchrony in networked chaotic oscillators, Physical Review Letters 108, 16...

    2012

  56. [64]

    Letellier and L

    C. Letellier and L. A. Aguirre, Investigating nonlinear dynamics from time series: The influence of symmetries and the choice of observables, Chaos 12, 549 (2002)

    2002

  57. [65]

    Sendi˜ na-Nadal and C

    I. Sendi˜ na-Nadal and C. Letellier, Observability analysis and state reconstruction for networks of nonlinear sys- tems, Chaos 32, 083109 (2022)

    2022

  58. [66]

    D. R. Chialvo, Generic excitable dynamics on a two- dimensional map, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 5, 461 (1995)

    1995

  59. [67]

    N. V. Stankevich, A. S. Gonchenko, E. S. Popova, and S. V. Gonchenko, Complex dynamics of the simplest neu- ron model: Singular chaotic shilnikov attractor as specific oscillatory neuron activity, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 172, 113565 (2023)

    2023

  60. [68]

    Boccaletti, J

    S. Boccaletti, J. Kurths, G. Osipov, D. Valladares, and C. Zhou, The synchronization of chaotic systems, Physics Reports 366, 1 (2002)

    2002

  61. [69]

    O. E. R¨ ossler, An equation for continuous chaos, Physics Letters A 57, 397 (1976)

    1976

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.