Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 61 references

Piezoelectric Bulk Acoustic Resonators For Dark Photon Detection

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A single 10 g piezoelectric quartz resonator in a large cold shield can reach a kinetic-mixing sensitivity near 10^-16 for sub-µeV dark photon dark matter, several orders of magnitude below current experiments.

desk verdict Genuinely new BAR dark-photon channel; clean derivation, but the paper's own modes make even harmonics uncoupled, and anisotropic mode overlap remains unquantified. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.05504 v1 pith:PVUNS6C2 submitted 2025-01-09 hep-ph astro-ph.CO

Tanner Trickle This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.CO
keywords darkphotonmatterkineticmixingbulkacousticresonatorpiezoelectricdetectionphononeigenmodesquartzhaloscopeultralight
topics Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a kinetically mixed dark photon, one of the simplest and best-motivated ultralight dark matter candidates, can be detected by the same cm-scale piezoelectric bulk acoustic resonators (BARs) that are already being built to search for high-frequency gravitational waves. The dark photon's effective electric field resonantly drives mechanical phonons in a quartz BAR, and the resulting piezoelectric voltage is read out as a narrow radio-frequency line. The author projects that a single 10 g quartz BAR, placed in a large, cold, shielded dilution-refrigerator environment, would be orders of magnitude more sensitive to the kinetic-mixing parameter than any current experiment after only one month of exposure. If this is right, existing and planned BAR facilities become competitive dark-photon haloscopes without major hardware changes, and the same piezoelectric readout can be redirected to axion searches in a magnetic field. The projection rests on approximate scalar, isotropic, Gaussian phonon eigenmodes whose accuracy in real anisotropic quartz remains to be checked numerically.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the plano-convex BAR phonon eigenmode, $U_n(x) = (1/\sqrt{M_n \omega_n}) \cos(n\pi z/L(x,y)) \exp(-(x^2+y^2)/(2r_n^2))$, an approximate scalar, isotropic solution with a Gaussian transverse profile of radius $r_n \approx R (c_t/(\omega_n R))^{1/2}(L_0/(2h))^{1/4}$. This mode does double duty: it determines the resonator's effective mass $M_n = \rho \pi r_n^2 L_0$, which sets the coupling strength to the dark photon, and its Gaussian trapping keeps the mode away from the BAR edges, which is what allows ultrahigh quality factors. The signal mechanism is the piezoelectric interaction $\delta H = -\int E'\cdot P\, d^3x$ with $P = e_{pt} \nabla_z u$; on resonance this deposits the power of Eq. (8), and the Dicke radiometer equation converts that power into a signal-to-noise ratio for a given temperature, bandwidth, and observation time. The parametrization in Eq. (9) shows how $\kappa$ scales with each design choice.

What would settle it

Run a finite-element calculation of the true piezoelectric phonon eigenmodes of the proposed plano-convex x-cut quartz resonator, including anisotropic elasticity and the full stress-free boundary conditions, and compare the on-resonance excitation power of the fundamental mode with Eq. (8); if the resulting overlap factor M_n/$L0^{2}$ is smaller by even a factor of a few, the projected κ reach in Fig. 2 shifts by that factor and the claimed margin over current experiments shrinks accordingly.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated in the paper's own terms, is that a kinetically mixed dark photon with mass in the roughly $10^{-3}$ to 100 µeV range can be detected by a piezoelectric BAR because the dark photon's effective electric field, E' ≈ κ√(2ρ_V) ε_V cos(mV t)/ε0, resonantly excites longitudinal phonons through the piezoelectric tensor. On resonance, mV = ω_n, the deposited signal power is P_s^res = 32 $κ^{2}$ ρ_V/$ρ^{2}$ ($e_pt^{2}$/$ε0^{2}$)(Q_s/mV)(M_n/$L0^{2}$) $cos^{2}$θ_V, and feeding this power into the Dicke radiometer equation with a standard-quantum-limit amplifier and thermal noise Teff = max{T, mV} yields a projected sensitivity to κ as low as ~$10^{-16}$ near mV ~ 0.2 µeV for the 'Peak' resonator design inside a 1 m, 20 mK shield, with one month of observation. This is several orders of magnitude below current haloscope exclusions. The author concludes that a single 10 g device, built from x-cut quartz with Q_p = $10^{8}$ and read out in a large cold shield, offers a new and immediately practical path to sub-µeV dark photon dark matter, and that existing BAR experiments such as MAGE could already access new parameter space if operated cold with quantum-limited readout.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the approximate scalar, isotropic, stress-free Gaussian phonon eigenmodes of Eq. (2) give an accurate overlap integral for real anisotropic x-cut quartz, so that the true fundamental mode would not couple to the dark photon much more weakly than the projected power assumes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single 10 g quartz BAR in a large cold shield would probe κ below 10^-16 near mV ≈ 0.2 µeV, several orders of magnitude deeper than current haloscope bounds, with a one-month exposure.
  • The same BAR geometry already used by the MAGE gravitational-wave experiment would reach new dark-photon parameter space if cooled to 10 mK and read out at the standard quantum limit; a dedicated search of existing MAGE data is left as future work.
  • Scanning the dark photon mass by tuning the BAR resonances, with simultaneous readout of all phonon modes, preserves most of the peak sensitivity over an e-fold in mass, making the device a practical broadband haloscope.
  • The same piezoelectric excitation converts axions into phonons in an external magnetic field, so the dark-photon sensitivity projections translate into competitive axion-photon coupling limits via Eq. (10).
  • A kg-scale cold SiO2 target could serve simultaneously as a sub-GeV dark matter phonon detector and a µeV dark-photon/axion antenna, broadening the physics case for the proposed readout.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the κ sensitivity scales only as Q_p^{-1/4}, a real device whose quality factor falls from 10^8 to 10^6 would lose only about a factor of 10 in reach, suggesting the qualitative claim of superiority over current experiments survives unless the mode-overlap assumption itself breaks.
  • Shielding suppression is the main mass-dependent obstacle at sub-µeV scales; optimizing the shield geometry beyond the simple min{1,(mV Rs)^2} parametrization could extend the same resonator's reach to lower masses than shown in Fig. 2.
  • If single-phonon counting readout becomes available in the MHz band, the effective temperature floor Teff = max{T, mV} of the radiometer formula could be bypassed, yielding a sensitivity that improves faster than the square-root-of-time scaling assumed here.
  • A straightforward room-temperature or cryogenic measurement of the fundamental mode shape with laser Doppler vibrometry could validate the Gaussian-mode assumption in a prototype before committing to the full Colossus-Peak device.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper proposes using a piezoelectric bulk acoustic resonator (BAR) as a resonant detector for kinetically mixed dark photon dark matter. The dark electric field resonantly excites high-Q phonons via the piezoelectric coupling, and the resulting readout voltage yields a signal power computed with Fermi's Golden Rule, Eq. (7). The author evaluates several experimental configurations (MAGE, Colossus, cryo tank) and claims that a single 10 g quartz BAR in a large cold shield can reach kinetic mixing parameters κ below 10^-16, orders of magnitude beyond current haloscope limits, with a month-long exposure.

Significance. If the projections hold, this is a qualitatively new and comparatively inexpensive detection channel for sub-eV dark photon DM, leveraging existing high-Q acoustic resonator technology and the infrastructure of the MAGE and Colossus facilities. The derivation is transparent and uses independently measured material parameters, and the parametric scaling in Eq. (9) makes the design trade-offs explicit. The central weakness is that the quantitative reach is tied to an approximate phonon-mode overlap that the author explicitly defers to future numerical work, and the manuscript contains a parity selection rule that is not accounted for in the signal formula. These issues are correctable and do not invalidate the concept, but they are load-bearing for the specific sensitivity curves.

major comments (2)
  1. [Eqs. (2), (7), (8), and Fig. 2] The overlap integral in the interaction Hamiltonian, Eq. (6), evaluated with the mode profile Eq. (2), is proportional to ∫_0^L dz ∂_z cos(nπz/L) = (-1)^n − 1, which vanishes identically for every even n. Equations (7) and (8) are written for arbitrary n ≥ 1 and therefore assign a nonzero signal power to even harmonics. If the dots in Fig. 2 are the first ten harmonics n = 1,...,10, half of the displayed points have zero coupling; if they are intended to be the first ten odd harmonics, then the counting N_m ≈ m_V L_0/(π c_l) in footnote [55] still overcounts the coupled modes by a factor of two in the scanning sensitivity. The authors should impose the parity selection rule explicitly, correct Eq. (7) and the mode counting, and regenerate the sensitivity projections.
  2. [Supplemental Material, Eqs. (S.1)–(S.10)] The phonon modes are obtained under the assumptions of an isotropic medium, a scalar displacement u ≈ u ẑ, and stress-free planar boundaries. The text notes that a general analysis in anisotropic quartz is left for future work. Since the signal power is proportional to the square of the overlap between the uniform dark electric field and ∂_z u, an order-of-magnitude change in the true overlap would shift the projected κ by the same factor. The manuscript should either provide a numerical eigenmode calculation for the specific designs in Table I, or explicitly state that the quoted reach is an estimate whose dominant uncertainty is the mode-overlap integral. The abstract's 'orders of magnitude more sensitive' claim is stronger than the current level of validation.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sensitivity, footnote [55]] After the parity selection rule is imposed, the number of coupled modes in a given mass range is approximately m_V L_0/(2π c_l), not m_V L_0/(π c_l); the text and figure should be updated accordingly.
  2. [Fig. 2 caption] Please specify whether the dots are n = 1,...,10 or the first ten odd harmonics. The current wording 'first ten resonances' is ambiguous given the parity selection rule.
  3. [Footnote [54]] The claim that the thermalization time condition is approximately satisfied for all ω shown is not correct for the lowest-frequency mode of the Broad designs: for ν ≈ 295 kHz and Q_p = 10^8, τ_th ≈ 54 s, while the per-step observation time at T_obs = 1 yr is ≈ 31 s. Either correct the statement or exclude the affected low-frequency endpoint.
  4. [Introduction/Abstract] The abstract's '10 g piezoelectric BAR' refers to the total crystal mass; the coherent mode mass for the Peak design is roughly two orders of magnitude smaller because the Gaussian mode radius is much smaller than the crystal radius. A brief clarification would avoid overinterpreting the role of the total mass.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the sensitivity projection is a self-contained derivation from stated assumptions.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that a 10 g piezoelectric BAR can reach κ ~ 10^-16—is an extrapolation from a first-principles signal calculation, not a reduction of the output to the input. The phonon mode profiles (Eq. (2)) are derived in the Supplemental Material from the elastic wave equation under stated approximations (isotropic, scalar displacement, stress-free boundaries, parabolic top), with the explicit caveat that a full anisotropic analysis is left to future work. The signal power (Eq. (7)) follows from Fermi's Golden Rule applied to the piezoelectric interaction Hamiltonian, using material parameters (ρ, ε0, e_pt, sound speeds) cited from the independent Materials Project database and the standard local DM density. The sensitivity curves then use the Dicke radiometer equation with clearly stated experimental parameters (Table I) and an assumed Qp = 10^8. No parameter is fitted to the target quantity (κ reach); no 'prediction' is a renamed fitted value. The self-citations (Refs. [11], [59]) are pointers to or reproductions of derivations that are also carried out in this paper, so they are not load-bearing. A possible internal inconsistency regarding even-harmonic coupling (∫ ∂z cos(nπz/L0)dz = 0 for even n) affects the counting of usable modes in scanning sensitivity, but that is a correctness issue, not a circular one. Overall, the derivation is self-contained against external benchmarks; the acknowledged anisotropy limitation is an accuracy risk, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles or forces; the dark photon is a pre-existing candidate. The central claim depends on standard halo-model inputs, a parametric shielding model, and several experimental assumptions (Q_p, T, Tobs, SQL readout). These are stated, not hidden, but they are not yet demonstrated for the specific proposed devices.

free parameters (3)
  • Phonon quality factor Q_p = 10^8
    Assumed for all projected designs; sensitivity scales as Q_p^{-1/4}. Demonstrated quartz BAW Q-factors reach 10^10 (Ref. [29]), but the specific large plano-convex resonators in Table I are not yet demonstrated at this Q.
  • Operating temperature T = 4 K to 20 mK depending on design
    Sets the thermal noise floor via Teff = max{T, mV}. The MAGE-cold and Colossus designs assume dilution-refrigerator temperatures.
  • Observation time Tobs = 1 month (1 year for scanning)
    Sensitivity scales as Tobs^{-1/4} in kappa. Longer integration gives marginal improvement.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Dark photon DM is a classical oscillatory field with local density rho_V = 0.4 GeV/cm^3 and Q_DM ~ 10^6
    Standard halo model inputs; the signal power and scan step count depend on these.
  • domain assumption The dark photon couples to BAR phonons as an effective electric field in the mass basis, with dielectric screening 1/epsilon0 and shield suppression min{1,(mV Rs)^2}
    Invoked in the Signal section around Eq. (5); the shield suppression is parametric and geometry-dependent.
  • domain assumption Phonon eigenmodes are well described by the scalar, isotropic, stress-free solution with Gaussian transverse profile (Supplemental Eq. S.1-S.10)
    The author states a general anisotropic analysis is left to future work; the overlap integral that sets Ps comes from this approximation.
  • domain assumption The readout amplifier operates at the standard quantum limit with noise temperature omega (= mV) when T < mV
    Assumed in the Sensitivity section; SQL readout is not yet demonstrated over the full frequency range for these devices.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Piezoelectric Bulk Acoustic Resonators For Dark Photon Detection." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PVUNS6C2

@misc{pith2026250105504,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Piezoelectric Bulk Acoustic Resonators For Dark Photon Detection},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PVUNS6C2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.05504}
}
read the original abstract

The kinetically mixed dark photon is a simple, testable dark matter candidate with strong theoretical motivation. Detecting the feeble electric field dark photon dark matter produces requires extremely sensitive detectors. Bulk acoustic resonators (BARs), with their exceptionally high-quality phonon modes, are capable of achieving incredible sensitivity to gravitational waves in the MHz to GHz frequency range. The BAR phonons are typically read out by detecting the electric field generated by the BAR materials' piezoelectricity. Here we show that this piezoelectricity also rewards such detectors sensitivity to dark photon dark matter, as the dark electric field can resonantly excite BAR phonons. A single 10 g piezoelectric BAR in a large, cold, environment can be orders of magnitude more sensitive to the kinetic mixing parameter than any current experiment, with only a month-long exposure and thermally-limited backgrounds.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.05504 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Cross-section schematic of a plano-convex bulk acous [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Projected sensitivity of a single piezoelectric BAR to the kinetic mixing parameter, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [55]

    This is the number of dominantly coupled modes which have mode functions given by Eq. (2). Additional, more weakly coupled, modes may also prove to be useful, and are discussed in detail in the Supplemental Material

    work page

  2. [1]

    The U(1) Problem,

    S. Weinberg, “The U(1) Problem,” Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975) 3583–3593

    work page 1975

  3. [2]

    Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, “Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,” Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 1791–1797

    1977

  4. [3]

    CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, “CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1440–1443

    1977

  5. [4]

    Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons,

    F. Wilczek, “Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 279–282

    1978

  6. [5]

    A Search for Invisible Axion Dark Matter with the Axion Dark Matter Experiment,

    ADMX Collaboration, N. Du et al. , “A Search for Invisible Axion Dark Matter with the Axion Dark Matter Experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 no. 15, (2018) 151301, arXiv:1804.05750 [hep-ex]. 6

    arXiv 2018

  7. [6]

    Experimental Tests of the Invisible Axion,

    P. Sikivie, “Experimental Tests of the Invisible Axion,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 (1983) 1415–1417. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 52, 695 (1984)]

    work page 1983

  8. [7]

    Snowmass 2021 letter of interest: The tessaract dark matter project,

    C. Chang et al. , “Snowmass 2021 letter of interest: The tessaract dark matter project,” 2020

    work page 2021

Show all 61 references
  1. [8]

    Detection of Light Dark Matter With Optical Phonons in Polar Materials,

    S. Knapen, T. Lin, M. Pyle, and K. M. Zurek, “Detection of Light Dark Matter With Optical Phonons in Polar Materials,” Phys. Lett. B 785 (2018) 386–390, arXiv:1712.06598 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  2. [9]

    python package for dark matter scattering in dielectric targets,

    S. Knapen, J. Kozaczuk, and T. Lin, “python package for dark matter scattering in dielectric targets,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 1, (2022) 015014, arXiv:2104.12786 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Effective field theory for dark matter absorption on single phonons,

    A. Mitridate, K. Pardo, T. Trickle, and K. M. Zurek, “Effective field theory for dark matter absorption on single phonons,” Phys. Rev. D 109 no. 1, (2024) 015010, arXiv:2308.06314 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Listening For New Physics With Quantum Acoustics,

    R. Linehan, T. Trickle, C. R. Conner, S. Ghosh, T. Lin, M. Sholapurkar, and A. N. Cleland, “Listening For New Physics With Quantum Acoustics,” arXiv:2410.17308 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  5. [12]

    Broadband phonon production from axion absorption,

    I. M. Bloch, S. Knapen, A. Madden, and G. Marocco, “Broadband phonon production from axion absorption,” arXiv:2411.10542 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  6. [13]

    Detection and Generation of Gravitational Waves,

    J. Weber, “Detection and Generation of Gravitational Waves,” Phys. Rev. 117 (1960) 306–313

    1960

  7. [14]

    The Past, Present and Future of the Resonant-Mass Gravitational Wave Detectors,

    O. D. Aguiar, “The Past, Present and Future of the Resonant-Mass Gravitational Wave Detectors,” Res. Astron. Astrophys. 11 (2011) 1–42, arXiv:1009.1138 [astro-ph.IM]

    2011 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Sound of Dark Matter: Searching for Light Scalars with Resonant-Mass Detectors,

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, and K. Van Tilburg, “Sound of Dark Matter: Searching for Light Scalars with Resonant-Mass Detectors,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 no. 3, (2016) 031102, arXiv:1508.01798 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Searching for Scalar Dark Matter with Compact Mechanical Resonators,

    J. Manley, D. Wilson, R. Stump, D. Grin, and S. Singh, “Searching for Scalar Dark Matter with Compact Mechanical Resonators,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 no. 15, (2020) 151301, arXiv:1910.07574 [astro-ph.IM]

    2020 arXiv

  10. [17]

    New Horizons: Scalar and Vector Ultralight Dark Matter,

    D. Antypas et al. , “New Horizons: Scalar and Vector Ultralight Dark Matter,” arXiv:2203.14915 [hep-ex]

  11. [18]

    New Technologies for Axion and Dark Photon Searches,

    A. Berlin and Y. Kahn, “New Technologies for Axion and Dark Photon Searches,” arXiv:2412.08704 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  12. [19]

    WISPy Cold Dark Matter,

    P. Arias, D. Cadamuro, M. Goodsell, J. Jaeckel, J. Redondo, and A. Ringwald, “WISPy Cold Dark Matter,” JCAP 06 (2012) 013, arXiv:1201.5902 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Vector Dark Matter from Inflationary Fluctuations,

    P. W. Graham, J. Mardon, and S. Rajendran, “Vector Dark Matter from Inflationary Fluctuations,” Phys. Rev. D 93 no. 10, (2016) 103520, arXiv:1504.02102 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Completely dark photons from gravitational particle production during the inflationary era,

    E. W. Kolb and A. J. Long, “Completely dark photons from gravitational particle production during the inflationary era,” JHEP 03 (2021) 283, arXiv:2009.03828 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Dark Photon Dark Matter from a Network of Cosmic Strings,

    A. J. Long and L.-T. Wang, “Dark Photon Dark Matter from a Network of Cosmic Strings,” Phys. Rev. D 99 no. 6, (2019) 063529, arXiv:1901.03312 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Vector dark matter production at the end of inflation,

    M. Bastero-Gil, J. Santiago, L. Ubaldi, and R. Vega-Morales, “Vector dark matter production at the end of inflation,” JCAP 04 (2019) 015, arXiv:1810.07208 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Parametric Resonance Production of Ultralight Vector Dark Matter,

    J. A. Dror, K. Harigaya, and V. Narayan, “Parametric Resonance Production of Ultralight Vector Dark Matter,” Phys. Rev. D 99 no. 3, (2019) 035036, arXiv:1810.07195 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Relic Abundance of Dark Photon Dark Matter,

    P. Agrawal, N. Kitajima, M. Reece, T. Sekiguchi, and F. Takahashi, “Relic Abundance of Dark Photon Dark Matter,” Phys. Lett. B 801 (2020) 135136, arXiv:1810.07188 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Dark Photon Dark Matter Produced by Axion Oscillations,

    R. T. Co, A. Pierce, Z. Zhang, and Y. Zhao, “Dark Photon Dark Matter Produced by Axion Oscillations,” Phys. Rev. D 99 no. 7, (2019) 075002, arXiv:1810.07196 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Detectable, defect-free dark photon dark matter,

    D. Cyncynates and Z. J. Weiner, “Detectable, defect-free dark photon dark matter,” arXiv:2310.18397 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  21. [28]

    Experimental targets for dark photon dark matter,

    D. Cyncynates and Z. J. Weiner, “Experimental targets for dark photon dark matter,” arXiv:2410.14774 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  22. [29]

    Extremely low loss phonon-trapping cryogenic acoustic cavities for future physical experiments,

    S. Galliou, M. Goryachev, R. Bourquin, P. Abb´ e, J. P. Aubry, and M. E. Tobar, “Extremely low loss phonon-trapping cryogenic acoustic cavities for future physical experiments,” Scientific Reports 3 no. 1, (July,

  23. [30]

    Gravitational Wave Detection with High Frequency Phonon Trapping Acoustic Cavities,

    M. Goryachev and M. E. Tobar, “Gravitational Wave Detection with High Frequency Phonon Trapping Acoustic Cavities,” Phys. Rev. D 90 no. 10, (2014) 102005, arXiv:1410.2334 [gr-qc]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 108, 129901 (2023)]

    2014 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Rare Events Detected with a Bulk Acoustic Wave High Frequency Gravitational Wave Antenna,

    M. Goryachev, W. M. Campbell, I. S. Heng, S. Galliou, E. N. Ivanov, and M. E. Tobar, “Rare Events Detected with a Bulk Acoustic Wave High Frequency Gravitational Wave Antenna,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 no. 7, (2021) 071102, arXiv:2102.05859 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  25. [32]

    The multi-mode acoustic gravitational wave experiment: MAGE,

    W. M. Campbell, M. Goryachev, and M. E. Tobar, “The multi-mode acoustic gravitational wave experiment: MAGE,” Sci. Rep. 13 no. 1, (2023) 10638, arXiv:2307.00715 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [33]

    An update on the Colossus mK platform at Fermilab,

    M. I. Hollister, R. C. Dhuley, C. James, and G. L. Tatkowski, “An update on the Colossus mK platform at Fermilab,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1302 no. 1, (2024) 012030

    2024

  27. [34]

    Ultra-high-q phononic resonators on-chip at cryogenic temperatures

    P. Kharel, Y. Chu, M. Power, W. H. Renninger, R. J. Schoelkopf, and P. T. Rakich, “Ultra-high-q phononic resonators on-chip at cryogenic temperatures.” 2018. https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.10077

    2018 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Engineering eigenstates in high-overtone bulk acoustic resonators,

    P. Rosso G´ omez, “Engineering eigenstates in high-overtone bulk acoustic resonators,” 2022

    2022

  29. [36]

    Radio for hidden-photon dark matter detection,

    S. Chaudhuri, P. W. Graham, K. Irwin, J. Mardon, S. Rajendran, and Y. Zhao, “Radio for hidden-photon dark matter detection,” Phys. Rev. D 92 no. 7, (2015) 075012, arXiv:1411.7382 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  30. [37]

    In-situ Measurements of Dark Photon Dark Matter using Parker Solar Probe: Going beyond the Radio Window,

    H. An, S. Ge, J. Liu, and M. Liu, “In-situ Measurements of Dark Photon Dark Matter using Parker Solar Probe: Going beyond the Radio Window,” arXiv:2405.12285 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  31. [38]

    cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits,

    C. O’Hare, “cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits,” https://cajohare.github.io/AxionLimits/, July, 2020

    2020

  32. [39]

    Probing dark photons with plasma haloscopes,

    G. B. Gelmini, A. J. Millar, V. Takhistov, and E. Vitagliano, “Probing dark photons with plasma haloscopes,” Phys. Rev. D 102 no. 4, (2020) 043003, arXiv:2006.06836 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Search for dark photon dark matter: Dark E field radio pilot experiment,

    B. Godfrey et al. , “Search for dark photon dark matter: Dark E field radio pilot experiment,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 1, (2021) 012013, arXiv:2101.02805 [physics.ins-det]. 7

    2021 arXiv

  34. [41]

    A new experimental approach to probe QCD axion dark matter in the mass range above 40 µeV,

    MADMAX Collaboration, P. Brun et al. , “A new experimental approach to probe QCD axion dark matter in the mass range above 40 µeV,” Eur. Phys. J. C 79 no. 3, (2019) 186, arXiv:1901.07401 [physics.ins-det]

    2019 arXiv

  35. [42]

    The Measurement of Thermal Radiation at Microwave Frequencies,

    R. H. Dicke, “The Measurement of Thermal Radiation at Microwave Frequencies,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 17 no. 7, (1946) 268–275

    1946

  36. [43]

    The bandwidth is proportional to 1 /Qp versus 1/QDM since we are in the regime where QDM ≪ Qp [61]

  37. [44]

    Quantum limits on noise in linear amplifiers,

    C. M. Caves, “Quantum limits on noise in linear amplifiers,” Phys. Rev. D 26 (1982) 1817–1839

    1982

  38. [45]

    Observation of the Fundamental Nyquist Noise Limit in an Ultra-High Q-Factor Cryogenic Bulk Acoustic Wave Cavity,

    M. Goryachev, E. N. Ivanov, F. van Kann, S. Galliou, and M. E. Tobar, “Observation of the Fundamental Nyquist Noise Limit in an Ultra-High Q-Factor Cryogenic Bulk Acoustic Wave Cavity,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 105 (2014) 153505, arXiv:1410.4293 [physics.ins-det]

    2014 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Demonstration of a multiplexer of dissipationless superconducting quantum interference devices,

    J. A. B. Mates, G. C. Hilton, K. D. Irwin, L. R. Vale, and K. W. Lehnert, “Demonstration of a multiplexer of dissipationless superconducting quantum interference devices,” Applied Physics Letters 92 no. 2, (Jan., 2008)

    2008

  40. [47]

    A near–quantum-limited josephson traveling-wave parametric amplifier,

    C. Macklin, K. O’Brien, D. Hover, M. E. Schwartz, V. Bolkhovsky, X. Zhang, W. D. Oliver, and I. Siddiqi, “A near–quantum-limited josephson traveling-wave parametric amplifier,” Science 350 no. 6258, (Oct.,

  41. [48]

    Simultaneous brillouin and piezoelectric coupling to a high-frequency bulk acoustic resonator,

    T. Yoon, D. Mason, V. Jain, Y. Chu, P. Kharel, W. H. Renninger, L. Collins, L. Frunzio, R. J. Schoelkopf, and P. T. Rakich, “Simultaneous brillouin and piezoelectric coupling to a high-frequency bulk acoustic resonator,” Optica 10 no. 1, (Jan., 2023) 110

    2023

  42. [49]

    Commentary: The materials project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation,

    A. Jain, S. P. Ong, et al. , “Commentary: The materials project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation,” APL Materials 1 no. 1, (July,

  43. [50]

    A database to enable discovery and design of piezoelectric materials,

    M. de Jong, W. Chen, H. Geerlings, M. Asta, and K. A. Persson, “A database to enable discovery and design of piezoelectric materials,” Scientific Data 2 no. 1, (Sept.,

  44. [51]

    https://next-gen.materialsproject.org/

  45. [52]

    High-throughput screening of inorganic compounds for the discovery of novel dielectric and optical materials,

    I. Petousis, D. Mrdjenovich, E. Ballouz, M. Liu, D. Winston, W. Chen, T. Graf, T. D. Schladt, K. A. Persson, and F. B. Prinz, “High-throughput screening of inorganic compounds for the discovery of novel dielectric and optical materials,” Scientific Data 4 no. 1, (Jan., 2017)

    2017

  46. [53]

    An e-fold in mV is a range of masses whose maximum is e times the minimum, e.g., 1 µeV ≤ mV ≤ 2.7 µeV

  47. [54]

    We note that the observation time per step while scanning, Tobs/QDM, must also be greater than the thermalization time, τth = Qp/ω [16], which is approximately satisfied for all ω shown in Fig. 2

  48. [56]

    Electro-mechanical tuning of high-Q bulk acoustic phonon modes at cryogenic temperatures,

    W. M. Campbell, S. Galliou, M. E. Tobar, and M. Goryachev, “Electro-mechanical tuning of high-Q bulk acoustic phonon modes at cryogenic temperatures,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 122 no. 3, (2023) 032202, arXiv:2207.01176 [physics.app-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Materials, design, and characteristics of bulk acoustic wave resonator: A review,

    Y. Liu, Y. Cai, Y. Zhang, A. Tovstopyat, S. Liu, and C. Sun, “Materials, design, and characteristics of bulk acoustic wave resonator: A review,” Micromachines 11 no. 7, (June, 2020) 630

    2020

  50. [58]

    Piezoaxionic effect,

    A. Arvanitaki, A. Madden, and K. Van Tilburg, “Piezoaxionic effect,” Phys. Rev. D 109 no. 7, (2024) 072009, arXiv:2112.11466 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Absorption of Axion Dark Matter in a Magnetized Medium,

    A. Berlin and T. Trickle, “Absorption of Axion Dark Matter in a Magnetized Medium,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 no. 18, (2024) 181801, arXiv:2305.05681 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Multichannel direct detection of light dark matter: Target comparison,

    S. M. Griffin, K. Inzani, T. Trickle, Z. Zhang, and K. M. Zurek, “Multichannel direct detection of light dark matter: Target comparison,” Phys. Rev. D 101 no. 5, (2020) 055004, arXiv:1910.10716 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Deepest sensitivity to wavelike dark photon dark matter with superconducting radio frequency cavities,

    R. Cervantes et al. , “Deepest sensitivity to wavelike dark photon dark matter with superconducting radio frequency cavities,” Phys. Rev. D 110 no. 4, (2024) 043022, arXiv:2208.03183 [hep-ex]. 8 Supplemental Material: Phonon Eigenmode Derivation Tanner Trickle In this Suppleme...

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.