Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Gigahertz directional light modulation with electro-optic metasurfaces

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A plasmonic-organic metasurface steers light at gigahertz speeds by tuning subwavelength resonators with an electro-optic polymer, reaching a measured bandwidth of about 3.6 GHz.

desk verdict Solid quasi-BIC POH modulator, but the GHz beam steering claim rests on an unmeasured device configuration. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.06102 v1 pith:SCA4KBQJ submitted 2025-01-10 physics.optics physics.app-ph

Sam Lin , Yixin Chen , Taeseung Hwang , Anant Upadhyay , Ramy Rady , David Dolt , Samuel Palermo , Kamran Entesari
show 3 more authors
Christi Madsen Zi Jing Wong Shoufeng Lan
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-ph
keywords metasurfaceelectro-opticmodulationbeamsteeringquasi-boundstatesinthecontinuumplasmonic-organichybridJRD1gigahertzbandwidthspatiallight
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper works toward a long-sought capability: an active metasurface that can steer a free-space light beam at gigahertz speeds by controlling individual subwavelength elements. It proposes a plasmonic-organic hybrid architecture in which a sawtooth-corrugated gold slot array supports quasi-bound states in the continuum, confining both optical and electrical fields inside a thin layer of the electro-optic polymer JRD1. The authors measure a quasi-static resonance tunability of 0.4 nm/V and use it to redirect a reflected beam between diffraction orders, demonstrated between the 0th and +1st orders, while a separately wired modulator version of the same metasurface reaches an electro-optic bandwidth of about 3.6 GHz. If the claim holds, this is a route to compact, high-speed spatial light modulation without the capacitance penalty of nanogap plasmonic devices.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the sawtooth-perturbed plasmonic slot waveguide, a modified slot waveguide whose zigzag edges break symmetry, fold the X-point traveling mode into the light cone at the Brillouin-zone center, and open a band gap that confines the mode sideways. The same metal electrodes that support the plasmonic resonance also carry the low-frequency poling and modulation fields, so the optical and DC/RF fields coincide in the JRD1 layer. A back reflector turns the structure into a one-port overcoupled resonator, which is what makes a near-2π phase response available for phased-array beam steering.

What would settle it

Measure the S-parameters and the electro-optic frequency response of the actual three-electrode beam steering device used for the diffraction-order measurements, and compare its 3 dB roll-off with the 3.6 GHz modulator value; a large discrepancy would falsify the gigahertz beam-steering claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the paper's own terms, the discovery is a new metasurface archetype: a corrugated metallic slot array that supports plasmonic quasi-bound states in the continuum, whose slots are infiltrated with the organic electro-optic chromophore JRD1. The traveling-wave slot modes fold into the light cone at the zone center, and the structure is tuned into an overcoupled resonator regime so that each unit cell provides close to a 2π phase swing across its resonance. Applying different voltages to two signal electrodes produces a phase gradient that steers the reflected beam from the 0th to the +1st diffraction order, and the electro-optic response of the architecture is measured to roll off at about 3.6 GHz, corresponding to an electrical S-parameter bandwidth of about 3.9 GHz.

Load-bearing premise

The gigahertz bandwidth is measured on a modulator variant with isolated ground-signal-ground pads and a patterned back reflector, and the paper assumes the three-electrode beam steering device, with its winding ground and unpatterned reflector, has the same electrical speed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single-layer-lithography beam steering metasurface can switch a reflected beam between diffraction orders at speeds useful for high-resolution scanning and LiDAR-like applications.
  • Scaling the active area from 50 μm toward a 10 μm fiber-mode size raises the capacitance-limited bandwidth ceiling toward the order of 100 GHz, as the paper's scaling argument indicates.
  • The same quasi-BIC slot architecture can be refilled with emerging low-loss chromophores, including ones operating at visible wavelengths, extending fast wavefront control beyond the telecom band.
  • Field-based index modulation distributed over a relatively large volume avoids the 5–10 nm electrode gaps that cap the speed of gap-plasmon and transparent-conducting-oxide metasurfaces.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not directly demonstrate gigahertz beam steering; that claim rests on extrapolating the modulator device's bandwidth to the differently wired three-electrode steering device, so a direct high-speed steering measurement would be the natural test.
  • The stated scaling law assumes capacitance is the dominant limit; at larger areas, electrode resistance, impedance mismatch, and the winding ground electrode could introduce additional roll-off, so the ~100 GHz estimate may be optimistic.
  • If the quasi-BIC design is chromophore-agnostic, it creates a plug-in platform for evaluating any electro-optic polymer with a strong nonlinear coefficient in a fast phased-array geometry without redesigning the plasmonic resonator.
  • The sawtooth quasi-BIC approach could plausibly be extended to transmissive configurations or to multiple independent phase-gradient channels to enable two-dimensional beam steering rather than the single-axis steering shown here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper reports a plasmonic-organic hybrid (POH) metasurface for electro-optic beam steering. The device uses a sawtooth-corrugated metallic slot array supporting plasmonic quasi-BICs, infiltrated with the organic electro-optic material JRD1. The authors demonstrate a quasi-static resonance tunability of 0.4 nm/V, electrical steering of reflected light between the 0th and +1st diffraction orders, and an electro-optic bandwidth of approximately 3.6 GHz measured on a modulator-configuration device. They also present an RC scaling argument suggesting that smaller devices could reach much higher bandwidths. The central claim is that this architecture enables gigahertz-speed beam steering, but that claim is not directly demonstrated: the high-speed measurements were performed on a device with a patterned back reflector and isolated GSG pads, while the beam steering device uses different electrode wiring and an unpatterned reflector.

Significance. If the central claim were fully supported, the architecture would be an important advance in high-speed spatial light modulation, offering a route to avoid the nanoscale electrode gaps that limit TCO- and plasmon-based active metasurfaces. The paper's concrete strengths are the quasi-static beam steering demonstration, the 0.4 nm/V tuning efficiency, and the separate gigahertz electro-optic modulator characterization with both electrical S-parameters and optical roll-off data. The coupled-mode linewidth extraction is empirical and the RC scaling law is a simple argument, so there is no concerning circular dependence on the paper's own outputs. However, the title-level claim of gigahertz directional light modulation rests on an untested assumption that the modulator configuration and the beam steering configuration are electrically equivalent. The abstract's 'three diffraction orders' claim is also not supported by the presented data, which show only 0th- and +1st-order steering. As written, the manuscript overstates what is experimentally demonstrated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods / Fig. 5 / Discussion] The gigahertz bandwidth claim is not transferable to the beam steering device. The Methods section states that for the modulator device the Au reflector was patterned to minimize parasitic capacitive coupling, whereas for the beam steering device the reflector remained unpatterned. Figure 5a further shows that the high-speed S-parameter and electro-optic measurements were performed on the modulator configuration with isolated GSG pads. The beam steering device instead uses a winding ground electrode, two signal electrodes, and an unpatterned reflector. Since the RC-limited bandwidth depends directly on device capacitance, these differences are load-bearing. No S-parameters or high-speed optical response are reported for the actual beam steering device, so the Discussion's statement that the work demonstrates 'gigahertz-speed wavefront modulation' is an extrapolation rather than a measured result.
  2. [Abstract / Fig. 4] The abstract and introduction claim beam steering 'between three diffraction orders', but the experiments in Fig. 4f-g show only 0th-order and +1st-order steering. No measurement of a -1st order or of a third diffraction order is presented anywhere in the manuscript. If the device is intended to address three orders, the data must show all three; otherwise the claim should be corrected.
  3. [Fig. 3e / Fig. 4f-g] The key quantitative claims lack error bars and repeated-device statistics. The 0.40 nm/V tuning efficiency is extracted from a single quasi-DC measurement in Fig. 3e without stated uncertainty, and the beam steering comparison in Fig. 4 is described only as 'largely reflected' in the experimental results, with no measured side-lobe suppression ratio or quantitative agreement metric. This makes it difficult to assess device-to-device reproducibility or to support the comparative statement that this is the 'highest reported' tuning efficiency in chromophore-infiltrated metasurfaces.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 2 caption / Results] The Fig. 2 caption says the 135 nm slot width is optimal for maximal phase modulation, while the main text says the authors aim for 165 nm to remain over-coupled while avoiding reduced phase tuning efficiency; this apparent discrepancy should be clarified.
  2. [Fig. 5b caption] The notation 'S 2x' and the statement that curves are 'offset by 1 dB for visibility' are not defined; please spell out what is being shown and how the offset is applied.
  3. [Methods / Fig. 5e-f] The eye diagrams are described as averaged across 2048 patterns in offline post-processing, but no bit-error rate or un-averaged eye metric is reported; at least one such quantity would help support the claim of digital modulation capability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's central results are direct experimental measurements, with the main weakness being an extrapolation from modulator to steering device rather than a derivation that reduces to its inputs.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is experimental and self-contained. The resonance tunability (0.4 nm/V) is obtained by measuring reflectivity modulation under a quasi-DC triangle wave, not from a fitted model. The coupled-mode/one-port resonator fits in Fig. 3d are used only to extract effective linewidths and identify the overcoupled regime; they do not generate the reported tunability or bandwidth. The beam steering demonstration is a direct optical measurement of switching between the 0th and +1st diffraction orders; the array model uses measured single-element spectra as inputs, but the predicted diffraction intensities are compared with an independently measured diffraction pattern, so the comparison is not circular. The 3.6-4 GHz bandwidths are measured electrical S-parameters and electro-optic roll-off, and the scaling law is an RC argument rather than a fit. The main gap, that high-speed data were acquired on a modulator-configuration device with GSG pads and a patterned reflector rather than on the steering device, is an unvalidated extrapolation and a scope/correctness risk, not a case where a claimed prediction reduces by construction to its inputs. Similarly, the abstract's 'three diffraction orders' is not fully demonstrated by the two-order data shown, but this is an evidence/support issue, not circularity. The self-citations (refs. 2, 51) are background support for beam steering importance and band folding and are not load-bearing. No circular step was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims are experimental and rely on standard device physics and fabrication; no new entities are introduced. The main assumptions are the applicability of coupled-mode theory, the assumed JRD1 refractive index, and the quasi-BIC mode interpretation.

free parameters (3)
  • Slot width w_slot = 165 nm (simulated design); 170 nm (device 3)
    Chosen by hand to stay in over-coupled regime; the paper states 'we aim to fabricate devices with w_slot = 165 nm to remain over-coupled.' This choice determines the phase tunability and is central to the beam steering claim.
  • Array period a_y = 800 nm
    Chosen to maximize steering angle while maintaining low crosstalk. This is a design parameter, not fitted to data, but it sets the diffraction geometry.
  • Sawtooth perturbation angle alpha = 22.5 degrees
    Chosen to induce a quasi-BIC by folding the X-point mode into the light cone. This angle controls radiative coupling and is central to the resonator design.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Single-port resonator model (coupled mode theory) accurately describes the metasurface unit cell reflection.
    Used to fit measured reflection spectra and extract radiative/absorption linewidths (Fig 2f, Fig 3d). This assumes the back reflector constrains radiation to one port.
  • domain assumption JRD1 refractive index is 1.81 at 1550 nm and its electro-optic response is linear and follows poling direction.
    Used in COMSOL simulations (Methods) and in the phase modulation model. Any deviation affects the predicted tuning and beam steering.
  • domain assumption The sawtooth perturbation folds the X-point traveling mode into the light cone at Gamma, creating a quasi-BIC with negligible in-plane leakage after tip flattening and band-gap mirror periods.
    This is the physical basis for the resonator; relies on band-folding theory from refs 51-53.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gigahertz directional light modulation with electro-optic metasurfaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SCA4KBQJ

@misc{pith2026250106102,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gigahertz directional light modulation with electro-optic metasurfaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SCA4KBQJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.06102}
}
read the original abstract

Active metasurfaces promise spatiotemporal control over optical wavefronts, but achieving high-speed modulation with pixel-level control has remained an unmet challenge. While local phase control can be achieved with nanoscale optical confinement, such as in plasmonic nanoparticles, the resulting electrode spacings lead to large capacitance, limiting speed. Here, we demonstrate the operation of a gigahertz-tunable metasurface for beam steering through local control of metasurface elements in a plasmonic-organic hybrid architecture. Our device comprises a corrugated metallic slot array engineered to support plasmonic quasi-bound states in the continuum (quasi-BICs). These plasmonic quasi-BICs provide ideal optical confinement and electrical characteristics for integrating organic electro-optic (OEO) materials like JRD1 and have not been previously utilized in optical metasurfaces. We obtain a quasi-static resonance tunability of 0.4 nm/V, which we leverage to steer light between three diffraction orders and achieve an electro-optic bandwidth of ~4 GHz, with the potential for further speed improvements through scaling rules. This work showcases on-chip spatiotemporal control of light at the sub-micrometer and gigahertz level, opening new possibilities for applications in 3D sensing and high-speed spatial light modulation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Hybrid BaTiO3/TiO2 Metasurface for Efficient Gigahertz-Speed Free-Space Electro-Optic Modulation

    physics.optics 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A hybrid BTO/TiO2 metasurface modulator achieves ~0.020 V^-1 transmittance efficiency, ~0.8 GHz bandwidth, and 0.3 mm aperture simultaneously using RF-sputtered BaTiO3.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Kim, I. et al. Nanophotonics for light detection and ranging technology. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 508–524 (2021)

    2021

  2. [2]

    & Wong, Z

    Lin, S., Chen, Y . & Wong, Z. J. High-performance optical beam steering with nanophotonics. Nanophotonics (2022) doi:10.1515/nanoph-2021-0805

    work page doi:10.1515/nanoph-2021-0805 2022

  3. [3]

    Shi, Y . et al. Augmented Reality Enabled by On-Chip Meta-Holography Multiplexing. Laser & Photonics Reviews 16, 2100638 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    & Wu, S.-T

    Xiong, J., Hsiang, E.-L., He, Z., Zhan, T. & Wu, S.-T. Augmented reality and virtual reality displays: emerging technologies and future perspectives. Light Sci Appl 10, 216 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Yin, K. et al. Advanced liquid crystal devices for augmented reality and virtual reality displays: principles and applications. Light Sci Appl 11, 161 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Komar, A. et al. Dynamic Beam Switching by Liquid Crystal Tunable Dielectric Metasurfaces. ACS Photonics 5, 1742–1748 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Li, S.-Q. et al. Phase-only transmissive spatial light modulator based on tunable dielectric metasurface. Science 364, 1087–1090 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Mansha, S. et al. High resolution multispectral spatial light modulators based on tunable Fabry-Perot nanocavities. Light Sci Appl 11, 141 (2022)

    work page 2022

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    Yu, D. et al. Polarization Independent Dynamic Beam Steering based on Liquid Crystal Integrated Metasurface. Sci Rep 14, 23627 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    He, Z. et al. Liquid Crystal Beam Steering Devices: Principles, Recent Advances, and Future Developments. Crystals 9, 292 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    & Wei, C

    Cao, T., Zheng, G., Wang, S. & Wei, C. Ultrafast beam steering using gradient Au- Ge2Sb2Te5 -Au plasmonic resonators. Opt. Express, OE 23, 18029–18039 (2015)

    2015

  4. [12]

    Wang, Q. et al. Optically reconfigurable metasurfaces and photonic devices based on phase change materials. Nature Photon 10, 60–65 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    Yin, X. et al. Beam switching and bifocal zoom lensing using active plasmonic metasurfaces. Light Sci Appl 6, e17016–e17016 (2017)

    2017

  6. [14]

    Kim, Y . et al. Phase Modulation with Electrically Tunable Vanadium Dioxide Phase-Change Metasurfaces. Nano Lett. 19, 3961–3968 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    & Bozhevolnyi, S

    Damgaard-Carstensen, C., Thomaschewski, M., Ding, F. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. Electrical Tuning of Fresnel Lens in Reflection. ACS Photonics 8, 1576–1581 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Weiss, A. et al. Tunable Metasurface Using Thin-Film Lithium Niobate in the Telecom Regime. ACS Photonics 9, 605–612 (2022)

    2022

  9. [17]

    Ju, Y . et al. Hybrid resonance metasurface for a lithium niobate electro-optical modulator. Opt. Lett., OL 47, 5905–5908 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    & Chen, C

    Xia, H., Li, Z. & Chen, C. Toroidal dipole Fano resonances driven by bound states in the continuum of lithium niobate metasurface for efficient electro-optic modulation. Optics Communications 554, 130178 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    & Fainman, Y

    Smolyaninov, A., El Amili, A., Vallini, F., Pappert, S. & Fainman, Y . Programmable plasmonic phase modulation of free-space wavefronts at gigahertz rates. Nat. Photonics 13, 431–435 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    Huang, Y .-W. et al. Gate-Tunable Conducting Oxide Metasurfaces. Nano Lett. 16, 5319– 5325 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    K., Sokhoyan, R., Wu, P

    Shirmanesh, G. K., Sokhoyan, R., Wu, P. C. & Atwater, H. A. Electro-optically Tunable Multifunctional Metasurfaces. ACS Nano 14, 6912–6920 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    Park, J. et al. All-solid-state spatial light modulator with independent phase and amplitude control for three-dimensional LiDAR applications. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 69–76 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    & Berini, P

    Calà Lesina, A., Goodwill, D., Bernier, E., Ramunno, L. & Berini, P. Tunable Plasmonic Metasurfaces for Optical Phased Arrays. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 27, 1–16 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    & Druml, N

    Maksymova, I., Steger, C. & Druml, N. Review of LiDAR Sensor Data Acquisition and Compression for Automotive Applications. Proceedings 2, 852 (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    H., Huddin, A

    Raj, T., Hashim, F. H., Huddin, A. B., Ibrahim, M. F. & Hussain, A. A Survey on LiDAR Scanning Mechanisms. Electronics 9, 741 (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    Li, Z. et al. Towards an ultrafast 3D imaging scanning LiDAR system: a review. Photon. Res., PRJ 12, 1709–1729 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Borshch, V ., Shiyanovskii, S. V . & Lavrentovich, O. D. Nanosecond Electro-Optic Switching of a Liquid Crystal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 107802 (2013)

    2013

  20. [28]

    Meyer, C. et al. Fr\’eedericksz-Like Transition in a Biaxial Smectic-$A$ Phase. Phys. Rev. X 11, 031012 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    Farmakidis, N. et al. Plasmonic nanogap enhanced phase-change devices with dual electrical-optical functionality. Science Advances 5, eaaw2687 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    Delaney, M. et al. Nonvolatile programmable silicon photonics using an ultralow-loss Sb2Se3 phase change material. Science Advances 7, eabg3500 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    de Galarreta, C. R. et al. Nonvolatile Reconfigurable Phase-Change Metadevices for Beam Steering in the Near Infrared. Advanced Functional Materials 28, 1704993 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    & Atwater, H

    Feigenbaum, E., Diest, K. & Atwater, H. A. Unity-Order Index Change in Transparent Conducting Oxides at Visible Frequencies. Nano Lett. 10, 2111–2116 (2010)

    2010

  25. [33]

    Forouzmand, A. et al. Tunable all-dielectric metasurface for phase modulation of the reflected and transmitted light via permittivity tuning of indium tin oxide. Nanophotonics 8, 415–427 (2018)

    2018

  26. [34]

    Koeber, S. et al. Femtojoule electro-optic modulation using a silicon–organic hybrid device. Light Sci Appl 4, e255–e255 (2015)

    2015

  27. [35]

    Ayata, M. et al. High-speed plasmonic modulator in a single metal layer. Science 358, 630– 632 (2017)

    2017

  28. [36]

    Haffner, C. et al. Harnessing nonlinearities near material absorption resonances for reducing losses in plasmonic modulators. Opt. Mater. Express, OME 7, 2168–2181 (2017)

    2017

  29. [37]

    Haffner, C. et al. Low-loss plasmon-assisted electro-optic modulator. Nature 556, 483–486 (2018)

    2018

  30. [38]

    Heni, W. et al. Silicon–Organic and Plasmonic–Organic Hybrid Photonics. ACS Photonics 4, 1576–1590 (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    Kieninger, C. et al. Ultra-high electro-optic activity demonstrated in a silicon-organic hybrid modulator. Optica, OPTICA 5, 739–748 (2018)

    2018

  32. [40]

    & Faraon, A

    Zheng, T., Gu, Y ., Kwon, H., Roberts, G. & Faraon, A. Dynamic light manipulation via silicon-organic slot metasurfaces. Nat Commun 15, 1557 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    Benea-Chelmus, I.-C. et al. Electro-optic spatial light modulator from an engineered organic layer. Nat Commun 12, 5928 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    Benea-Chelmus, I.-C. et al. Gigahertz free-space electro-optic modulators based on Mie resonances. Nat Commun 13, 3170 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    Ariu, K. et al. Characterization of Dimerized Plasmonic Grating for Reflective Electro-Optic Modulator. in 2024 IEEE Photonics Society Summer Topicals Meeting Series (SUM) 1–2 (2024). doi:10.1109/SUM60964.2024.10614513

    2024

  36. [44]

    Zhang, J. et al. Electrical tuning of metal-insulator-metal metasurface with electro-optic polymer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 113, 231102 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    Zhang, J. et al. High-speed metasurface modulator using perfectly absorptive bimodal plasmonic resonance. APL Photonics 8, 121304 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    & Qiu, F

    Sun, X. & Qiu, F. Polarization independent high-speed spatial modulators based on an electro-optic polymer and silicon hybrid metasurface. Photon. Res., PRJ 10, 2893–2900 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    Sun, X. et al. Manipulating Dual Bound States in the Continuum for Efficient Spatial Light Modulator. Nano Lett. 22, 9982–9989 (2022)

    2022

  40. [48]

    Zhang, L. et al. Plasmonic metafibers electro-optic modulators. Light Sci Appl 12, 198 (2023)

    2023

  41. [49]

    Kamada, S. et al. Superiorly low half-wave voltage electro-optic polymer modulator for visible photonics. Opt. Express, OE 30, 19771–19780 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    Heni, W. et al. Nonlinearities of organic electro-optic materials in nanoscale slots and implications for the optimum modulator design. Opt. Express, OE 25, 2627–2653 (2017)

    2017

  43. [51]

    P., Taghinejad, M

    Lan, S., Rodrigues, S. P., Taghinejad, M. & Cai, W. Dark plasmonic modes in diatomic gratings for plasmoelectronics. Laser & Photonics Reviews 11, 1600312 (2017)

    2017

  44. [52]

    C., Malek, S

    Overvig, A. C., Malek, S. C., Carter, M. J., Shrestha, S. & Yu, N. Selection rules for quasibound states in the continuum. Phys. Rev. B 102, 035434 (2020)

    2020

  45. [53]

    K., Tan, T

    Wang, W., Srivastava, Y . K., Tan, T. C., Wang, Z. & Singh, R. Brillouin zone folding driven bound states in the continuum. Nat Commun 14, 2811 (2023)

    2023

  46. [54]

    Ren, Y . et al. Low-threshold nanolasers based on miniaturized bound states in the continuum. Science Advances 8, eade8817 (2022)

    2022

  47. [55]

    Haus, H. A. Waves and Fields in Optoelectronics. (Prentice-Hall, 1984)

    1984

  48. [56]

    Shin, M. C. et al. Chip-scale blue light phased array. Opt. Lett., OL 45, 1934–1937 (2020)

    2020

  49. [57]

    Johnson, P. B. & Christy, R. W. Optical Constants of the Noble Metals. Phys. Rev. B 6, 4370– 4379 (1972). Fig. 1: Plasmonic-organic hybrid metasurfaces for beam steering. a, Schematic overview for a plasmonic-organic hybrid (POH) metasurface. The pictured device is configured ...

    1972

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.