Quantum networks using rare-earth ions

Adam Kinos; Andreas Walther; Lars Rippe; Mikael Afzelius; Wolfgang Tittel

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 226 references

Quantum networks using rare-earth ions

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that rare-earth-ion-doped crystals could serve as a single material platform for all essential quantum-network components: single-photon sources, multi-mode quantum memories, and processing qubits.

desk verdict A useful, authoritative review of rare-earth quantum network components; the main quantitative figure mixes classical and quantum storage, and the paper needs a cleanup pass before publication. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.06110 v1 pith:GDR3WBE6 submitted 2025-01-10 quant-ph

Wolfgang Tittel , Mikael Afzelius , Adam Kinos , Lars Rippe , Andreas Walther This is my paper · ORCID

classification quant-ph

keywords quantumnetworksrepeatersrare-earthionsmemoryatomicfrequencycombsingle-photonsourcesPurcelleffectsolid-statespins

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that rare-earth ions doped into transparent crystals can provide all the essential light-matter components for future quantum networks: sources of single photons, multi-mode quantum memories that store light, and long-lived qubits for processing. It claims that these three components can be built from the same material system, which opens the path to a single quantum-photonic integrated chip rather than a patchwork of incompatible technologies. The paper surveys the experimental state of the art and concludes that rare-earth memories are becoming useful for quantum repeaters, with storage beyond about 400 microseconds already beating a telecom fiber delay line of equivalent delay. A sympathetic reader would take the central claim to be that rare-earth-ion crystals are uniquely positioned to become the standard platform for quantum repeaters and the quantum internet.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the rare-earth ion's 4f-4f transition, which combines long excited-state lifetimes, large inhomogeneous broadening, and extraordinary optical and spin coherence at cryogenic temperatures. For memories, the atomic frequency comb protocol shapes the inhomogeneous line into periodic narrow absorption peaks; an absorbed photon's collective excitation rephases at a time $1/\Delta$, giving a multimode delay line, with spin-wave control extending storage toward the spin coherence time. For single ions, the Purcell effect shortens the long excited-state lifetime and directs emission into a cavity mode, making single-photon detection and qubit readout possible. These two mechanisms—comb rephasing and Purcell-enhanced emission—carry the argument that one material can host everything.

What would settle it

Measure efficiency versus storage time for a true heralded single-photon state in the same memory and at the same efficiency levels used for strong pulses; if the single-photon efficiency falls markedly below the pooled curve, the claimed crossover near 400 microseconds would not hold for quantum states.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that rare-earth-ion-doped crystals are arguably unique candidates for light-matter interfaces for quantum networks because they combine optical coherence times that can exceed one millisecond with spin coherence times up to hours. The paper reviews three component roles: Purcell-enhanced single ions as indistinguishable single-photon emitters, ensemble-based atomic frequency comb memories with large temporal-mode capacity, and individual ions as addressable qubits with demonstrated spin-photon entanglement. It assembles these into two quantum-repeater architectures—one based on multiplexed ensembles, one on individual ions—and reports that elementary repeater links have now been demonstrated, including a scalable link based on two ytterbium ions with entanglement persisting for almost ten milliseconds. The conclusion that all components can sit in the same material system is what makes the platform's promise concrete.

Load-bearing premise

The comparison that makes memories look useful beyond 400 microseconds assumes that storing strong laser pulses and storing true single-photon quantum states exercise the same memory protocol well enough to be pooled into one plot.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the platform matures as claimed, quantum repeater nodes could be fabricated as integrated photonic devices in one crystal, avoiding the loss and complexity of converting between different systems.
Ensemble memories with at least 50 percent efficiency, at least 10,000 modes, and 100 microseconds of optical storage, extendable to 100 milliseconds through spin-wave storage, would make first-generation repeaters practical.
Storage beyond about 400 microseconds already outperforms a telecom fiber delay line, so near-term repeaters could use rare-earth memories instead of waiting for better fiber.
Deterministic two-qubit gates between neighboring ions, once demonstrated, would enable deterministic entanglement swapping and in-node purification, the key advantage of the individual-ion architecture.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Beyond the paper's claims, the same pooling assumption that enables the 400 microsecond crossover could be tested directly: if true single-photon storage loses efficiency faster than strong-pulse storage, the crossover point for quantum use would move to longer storage times.
Beyond the paper's claims, erbium's telecom-wavelength operation suggests a particularly short path to practice, since its emission line already matches both fiber transmission and an erbium-based memory without frequency conversion.
Beyond the paper's claims, a near-term experiment combining high efficiency, large mode count, and spin-wave storage in one device would be the sharpest test of the single-chip vision.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The short version: this is a review by people who helped build the field. There is no new measurement, derivation, or protocol, and the paper says so. What it offers instead is a current, authoritative map of where rare-earth-ion quantum network components stand, and it deserves to be read by anyone entering quantum repeater work.

The strengths are real. The comparison between ensemble AFC memories and single-ion processor nodes is clear and well organized. The figures-of-merit sections (storage efficiency, storage time, post-selected fidelity, multiplexing, wavelength) are the kind of compact summary that experimental and theory groups both need. The coverage is up to date through early 2024, including the recent Yb single-ion results and the first elementary repeater links, and the authors are honest about open problems: spectral diffusion, lack of demonstrated ion-ion two-qubit gates, and missing single-photon indistinguishability from a second source. The citation pattern is self-heavy but appropriate; the central benchmark results come from several independent groups.

The soft spot is quantitative, not qualitative. Fig. 10 and the ~400 microsecond crossover versus fiber are the one place the review tries to make a concrete claim, and the text openly says it pools strong classical pulses, attenuated pulses, and true single-photon storage. That caveat is stated, but the caveat is load-bearing: the sentence that memories are likely to become rapidly useful follows directly from this figure. A referee should ask for a quantum-state-only version, or at least separate markers and more careful wording of the conclusion. As it stands, the figure likely overstates current performance for true quantum storage. The fits also have no error bars or fit parameters, which is acceptable for an illustrative review figure but should be labeled as such.

There are also two production problems that should be fixed before publication: references [156] and [211] are empty, and Section IV.D contains a large, verbatim block of text and figures from a PRL paper that appears to be a copy-paste accident. That is not a scientific flaw, but it is exactly the kind of thing a referee should catch.

The central qualitative argument—that the same material platform can in principle host sources, memories, and qubits—holds up as a research direction. It is a proposal, not a demonstration, and the authors mostly present it that way.

Recommendation: send it to peer review. Reviews like this are useful, and this one is close to being the standard reference for the field, but it needs a careful referee to fix Fig. 10 and the editorial errors before it appears.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This review examines rare-earth-ion doped crystals as a material platform for quantum networks, covering single-photon sources, ensemble-based AFC quantum memories, individual-ion qubits and quantum processor nodes, and recent elementary quantum repeater link demonstrations. The paper argues that the combination of long optical and spin coherence times, multimode memory capability, and recent progress on cavity-enhanced single-ion control makes the platform uniquely suited for light-matter interfaces in future quantum repeaters. A central quantitative point is Fig. 10, which compares AFC memory efficiency versus storage time against a telecom fiber delay line and concludes that memories become competitive beyond roughly 400 microseconds and are likely to become rapidly useful for quantum repeaters.

Significance. If its central claims hold, the review provides a timely and useful synthesis of a fast-moving field, combining results from many independent groups and clearly articulating figures of merit for both ensemble memories and single-ion processor nodes. The paper is candid about many limitations, such as spectral diffusion, the difficulty of two-qubit gates between rare-earth ions, and the current gap between demonstrated and required memory efficiencies. Its explicit benchmarks, such as the proposed target of 50% efficiency with 10000 modes and 100 microseconds of optical storage, are valuable for future work. However, the quantitative conclusion about memory usefulness rests on a benchmark figure whose evidentiary basis needs tightening, and two cited references are missing, which currently prevents the reader from verifying parts of the argument.

major comments (2)

[Sec. V C, Fig. 10] The claim that atomic memories outperform a telecom fiber delay line for storage times beyond roughly 400 microseconds, and the subsequent conclusion that such memories are likely to become rapidly useful for quantum repeaters, rests on Fig. 10, which pools data from strong classical laser pulses, attenuated laser pulses, and true single-photon or entangled-photon storage. The text explicitly acknowledges that storing strong laser pulses is much easier than storing true quantum states of light and that this difference is ignored for the purpose of the paper. This assumption is load-bearing: classical-pulse storage does not face the same noise-floor, added-noise, or multi-excitation constraints as single-photon storage, so the efficiency-versus-time picture and the resulting crossover could shift substantially if only quantum-state demonstrations were retained. Please either re-analyze Fig. 10 using only single-photon and entangled-photon data, with error bars and the fit model specified, or substantially qualify the quantitative usefulness conclusion so that it is not presented as a direct consequence of the pooled data.
[References [156] and [211]] Two references are empty. In Sec. V B, the statement that all rare-earth wavelengths of current interest except erbium differ from the fiber-optimum wavelength is supported by the missing reference [156]. In Sec. VI A, the claim about thulium zero-phonon lines connecting the ground state with different excited states is supported by the missing reference [211]. Without these references, the cited claims cannot be checked, and any reader relying on the bibliography is left with a gap. Please restore the complete citations or remove the corresponding text.

minor comments (4)

[Fig. 10 caption and Sec. V C] The data provenance for Fig. 10 is inconsistent: the text says the data are extracted from a total of five papers, but the following sentence enumerates six references ([65], [108], [109], [110], [153], [164]), and the legend lists eight series, including two entries for Eu:YSO with spin control. Please clarify how many unique papers and data series are plotted and whether the duplicate Eu:YSO entry is intentional.
[Sec. V B, wavelength discussion] The sentence beginning 'With the exception of erbium []' contains an empty bracket where reference [156] should be; after restoring the reference, please also check that the sentence reads grammatically.
[Sec. VI A] The sentence 'This protocol may rely on an individual ion acting as both the photon emitter and the long-lived qubit, as in the case of trapped ions [49] and diamond color centers [7]' is followed later by an incomplete parenthetical reference in 'although it is possible to frequency convert photons at the cost of added complexity (see section IV C.' The missing closing parenthesis should be fixed.
[General typography] There are several typographical errors, including 'developmets' in Sec. VII, 'abreviation' in the Fig. 10 caption, 'poof-of-principle' in Sec. VIII, and 'ackowledges' in the Acknowledgements. These should be corrected in a final pass.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular derivation found: the review's comparative conclusions are benchmarked against external data, and the one pooling limitation (classical vs quantum pulses) is explicitly stated, not a circular step.

full rationale

This paper is a review with no original derivation or fitted prediction; its central claim that rare-earth-ion-doped crystals are uniquely suitable light-matter interfaces rests on material properties and experimental demonstrations by many independent groups. The closest thing to a quantitative conclusion is Fig. 10, where measured storage efficiency versus time is compared with a telecom-fiber delay line. The figure pools strong classical pulses with single-photon and attenuated-laser data; the text explicitly concedes 'storage of strong laser pulses is much easier than storage of true quantum states of light' and says the difference is ignored (Section V C). That is a stated modeling limitation and a correctness risk for the 400-microsecond crossover claim, but it is not circular: the plotted efficiencies are external measured values used as benchmarks, not inputs redefined as outputs. Self-citations (e.g., refs. 37, 65, 108, 110, 151) are used to document experiments, many of which are corroborated by groups not among the authors, and none is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as the sole justification for the review's conclusion. No step in the paper reduces to its own input by construction; the score reflects only the minor self-citation presence noted in the reader's take, not a circular derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review adds no free parameters of its own; the only fitted quantities are the efficiency-decay lines in Fig. 10, whose parameters are not reported. The central assessment rests on the cited experiments being accurate, on pooling classical and quantum storage data, and on target assumptions from repeater rate simulations. No new entities are proposed.

free parameters (1)

Fig. 10 memory efficiency decay fits = not reported
Lines labelled fits to measured data in Fig. 10 are used to compare memory performance with fiber delay; fit parameters are not stated, and some points are strong classical pulses rather than single-photon storage.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption The experimental results cited from the literature are accurately reported and representative of the state of the art.
The review's assessments in Sections V C, VI E, and VII aggregate third-party demonstrations; the authors do not re-run any experiment.
domain assumption Classical strong-pulse storage and quantum single-photon storage follow the same protocol steps, so results can be compared in Fig. 10.
Section V C states 'we ignore this difference'; if not valid, the benchmark overstates quantum memory performance.
domain assumption Repeater rate simulations assume 90 percent memory efficiency and specific storage-time targets, such as 500 microseconds round-trip for a 100 km link and 100 milliseconds for first-generation repeaters.
Section V B states 'many repeater rate simulations assume memory efficiencies of 90 percent'. These targets are not yet met by current devices.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum networks using rare-earth ions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GDR3WBE6

@misc{pith2026250106110,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum networks using rare-earth ions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GDR3WBE6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.06110}
}

read the original abstract

We review concepts and recent work related to creating light-matter interfaces for future quantum networks based on rare-earth ion-doped crystals. More precisely, we explore their unique suitability for creating photon sources, optical quantum memories for light, and qubits that allow quantum information processing. In addition, we review the state-of-the-art of elementary quantum repeater links, and provide suggestions for future research.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.06110 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (8 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Characterization of Er apered m and pulses. The error bars represent ) p[] olled reversible inho gp on the order of tens of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png]

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

226 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages

[211]

Debnath, A

K. Debnath, A. H. Kiilerich, and K. Mølmer, Phys. Rev. A 103, 043705 (2021)

work page 2021
[1]

Schrödinger, Math

E. Schrödinger, Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 31, 555 (1935)

1935
[2]

J. S. Bell, Physics 1, 195 (1964)

1964
[3]

Aspect, P

A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett.47, 460 (1981)

1981
[4]

Tittel, J

W. Tittel, J. Brendel, H. Zbinden, and N. Gisin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998)

1998
[5]

Weihs, T

G. Weihs, T. Jennewein, C. Simon, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5039 (1998)

1998
[6]

M. A. Rowe, D. Kielpinski, V . Meyer, C. A. Sackett, W. M. Itano, C. Monroe, and D. J. Wineland, Nature 409, 791 (2001)

2001
[7]

Hensen, H

B. Hensen, H. Bernien, A. Dréau, A. Reiserer, N. Kalb, M. Blok, J. Ruitenberg, R. F. L. Vermeulen, R. N. Schouten, C. Abellán, W. Amaya, V . Pruneri, M. W. Mitchell, M. Markham, D. M. Twitchen, D. Elkouss, S. Wehner, T. H. Taminiau, and R. Hanson, Nature 526, 682 (2015)

2015

Show all 226 references

[8]

Wehner, D

S. Wehner, D. Elkouss, and R. Hanson, Science 362, eaam9288 (2018)

2018
[9]

Gisin, G

N. Gisin, G. Ribordy, W. Tittel, and H. Zbinden, Reviews of Modern Physics 74, 145 (2002)

2002
[10]

Van Meter and S

R. Van Meter and S. J. Devitt, IEEE Computer 49, 31 (2016)

2016
[11]

J. F. Fitzsimons, npj Quantum Information 3, 23 (2017)

2017
[12]

X. Guo, C. Breum, J. Borregaard, S. Izumi, M. V . Larsen, T. Gehring, M. Christandl, J. S. Beergard-Nielsen, and I. L. Andersen, Nature Physics 16, 281 (2020)

2020
[13]

H. J. Kimble, Nature 453, 1023 (2008)

2008
[14]

D. D. Awschalom, R. Hanson, J. Wrachtrup, and B. Zhou, Nature Photonics 12, 516 (2018)

2018
[15]

Reiserer, Rev

A. Reiserer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 041003 (2022)

2022
[16]

N. Tomm, A. Javadi, N. O. Antoniadis, D. Najer, N. C. Löbl, A. R. Korsch, R. Schott, S. R. Valentin, A. D. Wieck, L. A., and R. J. Warburton, Nature Nanotechnology 16, 399 (2021)

2021
[17]

Senellart, G

P. Senellart, G. Solomon, and A. White, Nature Nanotechnol- ogy 12, 1026 (2017)

2017
[18]

Zhang, X.-H

Q. Zhang, X.-H. Bao, C.-Y . Lu, X.-Q. Zhou, T. Yang, T. Rudolph, and J.-W. Pan, Phys. Rev. A 77, 062316 (2008)

2008
[19]

Cogan, Z.-E

D. Cogan, Z.-E. Su, O. Kenneth, and D. Gershoni, Nature Photonics 17, 324 (2023)

2023
[20]

S. D. Barrett and P. Kok, Phys. Rev. A 71, 060310(R) (2005)

2005
[21]

Knaut, A

C. Knaut, A. Suleymanzade, Y .-C. Wei, D. Assumpcao, P.-J. Stas, Y . Huan, B. Machielse, E. Knall, M. Sutula, G. Baranes, N. Sinclair, C. De-Eknamkul, D. Levonian, M. Bhaskar, H. Park, M. Loncar, and M. Lukin, Nature 629, 573 (2024)

2024
[22]

C. E. Bradley, J. Randall, M. H. Abobeih, R. C. Berrevoets, M. J. Degen, M. A. Bakker, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, and T. H. Taminiau, Phys. Rev. X9, 031045 (2019)

2019
[23]

Sanders, A

B. Sanders, A. Lvovsky, and W. Tittel, Nature Photonics 3, 706 (2009)

2009
[24]

Briegel, W

H.-J. Briegel, W. Dürr, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5932 (1998)

1998
[25]

Sangouard, C

N. Sangouard, C. Simon, H. De Riedmatten, and N. Gisin, Reviews of Modern Physics 83, 33 (2011)

2011
[26]

Heshami, D

K. Heshami, D. G. England, P. C. Humphreys, P. J. Bustard, V . M. Acosta, J. Nunn, and B. J. Sussman, J. Mod. Opt. 63, 2005 (2016)

2016
[27]

Zhong, M

M. Zhong, M. P. Hedges, R. L. Ahlefeld, J. G. Bartholomew, S. E. Beavan, S. M. Wittig, J. J. Longdell, and M. J. Sellars, Nature 517, 7533 (2015)

2015
[28]

Uysal, L

T. Uysal, L. Dusanowski, H. Xu, S. Horvarth, S. Ourari, R. Cava, N. de Leon, and J. Thompson, arXiv , 2406.06497 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[29]

Ruskuc, C.-J

A. Ruskuc, C.-J. Wu, E. Green, S. Hermans, J. Choi, and A. Faraon, arXiv , 2402.16224 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[30]

Kinos, D

A. Kinos, D. Hunger, R. Kolesov, K. Mølmer, H. de Riedmat- ten, P. Goldner, A. Tallaire, L. Morvan, P. Berger, S. Welin- ski, K. Karrai, L. Rippe, S. Kröll, and A. Walther, arXiv , 2103.15743 (2021)

2021 arXiv
[31]

A. M. Dibos, M. Raha, C. M. Phenicie, and J. D. Thompson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 243601 (2018)

2018
[32]

Zhong, J

T. Zhong, J. M. Kindem, J. G. Bartholomew, J. Rochman, I. Craiciu, V . Verma, S. W. Nam, F. Marsili, M. D. Shaw, A. D. Beyer, and A. Faraon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 183603 (2018)

2018
[33]

S. Chen, M. Raha, C. M. Phenicie, S. Ourari, and J. D. Thompson, Science 370, 592–595 (2020)

2020
[34]

Ulanowski, B

A. Ulanowski, B. Merkel, and A. Reiserer, Science Advances 8, eabo4538 (2022)

2022
[35]

Gritsch, A

A. Gritsch, A. Ulanowski, and A. Reiserer, Optica 10, 783 (2023)

2023
[36]

Deshmukh, E

C. Deshmukh, E. Beattie, B. Casabone, S. Grandi, D. Serrano, A. Ferrier, P. Goldner, D. Hunger, and H. de Riedmatten, Op- tica 10, 1339 (2023)

2023
[37]

Y . Yu, D. Oser, G. Da Prato, E. Urbinati, J. C. Ávila, Y . Zhang, P. Remy, S. Marzban, S. Gröblacher, and W. Tittel, Physical review letters 131, 170801 (2023)

2023
[38]

Huang, P.-J

J.-J. Huang, P.-J. Liang, L. Zheng, P.-Y . Li, Y .-Z. Ma, D.-C. Liu, J.-H. Xie, Z.-Q. Zhou, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Chinese Physics Letters 40, 070301 (2023)

2023
[39]

Ourari, L

S. Ourari, L. Dusanowski, S. P. Horvath, M. T. Uysal, C. M. Phenicie, P. Stevenson, M. Raha, S. Chen, R. J. Cava, N. P. de Leon, and J. D. Thompson, Nature 620, 977 (2023)

2023
[40]

L. Yang, S. Wang, M. Shen, J. Xie, and H. Tang, Nature Com- munications 14, 1718 (2023)

2023
[41]

Kolesov, K

R. Kolesov, K. Xia, R. Reuter, R. Stöhr, A. Zappe, J. Meijer, P. R. Hemmer, and J. Wrachtrup, Nature Communications 3, 1029 (2012)

2012
[42]

M. Peev, C. Pacher, R. Alléaume, C. Barreiro, J. Bouda, W. Boxleitner, T. Debuisschert, E. Diamanti, M. Dianati, J. Dynes, et al., New Journal of Physics 11, 075001 (2009)

2009
[43]

Dynes, A

J. Dynes, A. Wonfor, W.-S. Tam, A. Sharpe, R. Takahashi, M. Lucamarini, A. Plews, Z. Yuan, A. Dixon, J. Cho, et al., npj Quantum Information 5, 101 (2019)

2019
[44]

T.-Y . Chen, X. Jiang, S.-B. Tang, L. Zhou, X. Yuan, H. Zhou, J. Wang, Y . Liu, L.-K. Chen, W.-Y . Liu,et al., npj Quantum Information 7, 134 (2021). 18

2021
[45]

Y .-A. Chen, Q. Zhang, T.-Y . Chen, W.-Q. Cai, S.-K. Liao, J. Zhang, K. Chen, J. Yin, J.-G. Ren, Z. Chen, et al., Nature 589, 214 (2021)

2021
[46]

For a network connecting 48 government organizations across Korea see https://www.idquantique.com/idq-and-sk- broadband-complete-phase-one-of-nation-wide-korean-qkd- network/
[47]

Lutkenhaus, J

N. Lutkenhaus, J. Calsamiglia, and K.-A. Suominen, Phys. Rev. A 59, 3295 (1999)

1999
[48]

C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crépeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 1895 (1993)

1993
[49]

Sangouard, R

N. Sangouard, R. Dubessy, and C. Simon, Phys. Rev. A 79, 042340 (2009)

2009
[50]

J. Yin, Y . Cao, Y .-H. Li, S.-K. Liao, L. Zhang, J.-G. Ren, W.- Q. Cai, W.-Y . Liu, B. Li, H. Dai, et al., Science 356, 1140 (2017)

2017
[51]

Sinclair, E

N. Sinclair, E. Saglamyurek, H. Mallahzadeh, J. A. Slater, M. George, R. Ricken, M. P. Hedges, D. Oblak, C. Simon, W. Sohler,et al., Physical Review Letters113, 053603 (2014)

2014
[52]

Michler, K

M. Michler, K. Mattle, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. A 53, 1209(R) (1996)

1996
[53]

W. P. Grice, Phys. Rev. A 84, 042331 (2011)

2011
[54]

M. J. Bayerbach, S. E. D’Aurelio, P. van Loock, and S. Barz, ScienceAdvances 9, eadf4080 (2023)

2023
[55]

Complete analysis of a realistic fiber-based quantum repeater scheme,

A. Kinos, A. Walther, S. Kröll, and L. Rippe, “Complete analysis of a realistic fiber-based quantum repeater scheme,” (2023), arXiv:2309.04151 [quant-ph]

2023 arXiv
[56]

F. Gu, S. G. Menon, D. Maier, A. Das, T. Chakraborty, W. Tit- tel, H. Bernien, and J. Borregaard, arXiv , 2401.12395 (2024)

2024
[57]

R. W. Equall, R. L. Cone, and R. M. Macfarlane, Phys. Rev. B 52, 3963 (1995)

1995
[58]

R. Yano, M. Mitsunaga, and N. Uesugi, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 9, 992 (1992)

1992
[59]

C. W. Thiel, Y . Sun, T. Böttger, W. R. Babbitt, and R. L. Cone, Journal of Luminescence 130, 1598 (2010)

2010
[60]

Y . Sun, T. Böttger, C. W. Thiel, and R. L. Cone, Physical Review B 77, 085124 (2008)

2008
[61]

Ran ˇci´c, M

M. Ran ˇci´c, M. P. Hedges, R. L. Ahlefeldt, and M. J. Sellars, Nature Physics 14, 50 (2017)

2017
[62]

A. Ortu, A. Tiranov, S. Welinski, F. Fröwis, N. Gisin, A. Fer- rier, P. Goldner, and M. Afzelius, Nature Materials 17, 671 (2018)

2018
[63]

R. W. Equall, Y . Sun, R. L. Cone, and R. M. Macfarlane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2179 (1994)

1994
[64]

Böttger, C

T. Böttger, C. W. Thiel, R. L. Cone, and Y . Sun, Phys. Rev. B 79, 115104 (2009)

2009
[65]

Falamarzi Askarani, A

M. Falamarzi Askarani, A. Das, J. H. Davidson, G. C. Amaral, N. Sinclair, J. A. Slater, S. Marzban, C. W. Thiel, R. L. Cone, D. Oblak, and W. Tittel, Physical Review Letters127, 220502 (2021)

2021
[66]

F. Könz, Y . Sun, C. W. Thiel, R. L. Cone, R. W. Equall, R. L. Hutcheson, and R. L. Macfarlane, Phys. Rev. B 68, 085109 (2003)

2003
[67]

Oswald, M

R. Oswald, M. G. Hansen, E. Wiens, A. Y . Nevsky, and S. Schiller, Phys. Rev. A 98, 062516 (2018)

2018
[68]

Tittel, M

W. Tittel, M. Afzelius, T. Chanelière, R. L. Cone, S. Kröll, S. A. Moiseev, and M. Sellars, Las. Phot. Rev. 4, 244 (2010)

2010
[69]

Thiel, T

C. Thiel, T. Böttger, and R. Cone, Journal of Luminescence 131, 353 (2011)

2011
[70]

Rare earth-doped crystals for quantum information processing,

P. Goldner, A. Ferrier, and O. Guillot-Noël, “Rare earth-doped crystals for quantum information processing,” inHandbook on the Physics and Chemistry of Rare Earths(Elsevier, 2015) pp. 1–78

2015
[71]

R. Hull, J. Parisi, R. Osgood, H. Warlimont, G. Liu, and B. Jacquier, Spectroscopic Properties of Rare Earths in Op- tical Materials (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005)

2005
[72]

D. C. Burnham and D. L. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 84 (1970)

1970
[73]

Z. Y . Ou and L. Mandel, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 50 (1988)

1988
[74]

Giustina and et al., Phys

M. Giustina and et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250401 (2015)

2015
[75]

L. K. Shalm, E. Meyer-Scott, B. G. Christensen, P. Bierhorst, M. A. Wayne, M. J. Stevens, T. Gerrits, S. Glancy, D. R. Hamel, M. S. Allman, K. J. Coakley, S. D. Dyer, C. Hodge, A. E. Lita, V . B. Verma, C. Lambrocco, E. Tortorici, A. L. Migdall, Y . Zhang, D. R. Kumor, W. H. F...

2015
[76]

Jennewein, C

T. Jennewein, C. Simon, G. Weihs, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4729 (2000)

2000
[77]

D. S. Naik, C. G. Peterson, A. G. White, A. G. Berglund, and P. G. Kwiat, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 4733 (2000)

2000
[78]

Tittel, J

W. Tittel, J. Brendel, H. Zbinden, and N. Gisin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4737 (2000)

2000
[79]

Bouwmeester, J.-W

D. Bouwmeester, J.-W. Pan, K. Mattle, M. Eibl, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Nature 390, 575 (1997)

1997
[80]

Boschi, S

D. Boschi, S. Branca, F. De Martini, L. Hardy, and S. Popescu, hys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1121 (1998)

1998
[81]

Valivarthi, M

R. Valivarthi, M. l. G. Puigibert, Q. Zhou, G. H. Aguilar, V . B. Verma, F. Marsili, M. D. Shaw, S. W. Nam, D. Oblak, and W. Tittel, Nature Photonics 10, 676 (2016)

2016
[82]

Sun et al., Nature Photonics 10, 671 (2016)

Q.-C. Sun et al., Nature Photonics 10, 671 (2016)

2016
[83]

X. Ma, T. Herbst, T. Scheidl, et al., Nature 489, 269 (2012)

2012
[84]

Ren et al., Nature 549, 70 (2017)

J.-G. Ren et al., Nature 549, 70 (2017)

2017
[85]

S. Guha, H. Krovi, C. A. Fuchs, Z. Dutton, J. A. Slater, C. Si- mon, and W. Tittel, Physical Review A 92, 022357 (2015)

2015
[86]

Takeoka, S

M. Takeoka, S. Guha, and M. M. Wilde, Nature communica- tions 5, 5235 (2014)

2014
[87]

Pirandola, R

S. Pirandola, R. Laurenza, C. Ottaviani, and L. Banchi, Nature communications 8, 15043 (2017)

2017
[88]

Reiserer, S

A. Reiserer, S. Ritter, and G. Rempe, Science 342, 1349 (2013)

2013
[89]

Sinclair, K

N. Sinclair, K. Heshami, C. Deshmukh, D. Oblak, C. Simon, and W. Tittel, Nature Communications 7, 13454 (2016)

2016
[90]

Krovi, S

H. Krovi, S. Guha, Z. Dutton, J. A. Slater, C. Simon, and W. Tittel, Applied Physics B: Lasers and Optics 122, 52 (2016)

2016
[91]

Huang and P

Y .-P. Huang and P. Kumar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 030502 (2012)

2012
[92]

J. D. Franson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2205 (1989)

1989
[93]

Huber, D

M. Huber, D. amd Reindl, J. Aberl, A. Rastelli, and A. Trotta, Journal of Optics 20, 073002 (2018)

2018
[94]

D. E. Browne and T. Rudolph, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 010501 (2005)

2005
[95]

S. I. Bogdanov, M. Y . Shalaginov, A. S. Lagutchev, C.-C. Chi- ang, D. Shah, A. S. Baburin, I. A. Ryzhikov, I. A. Rodionov, A. V . Kildishev, B. A., and V . A. Shalaev, Nano Letters 18, 4837 (2018)

2018
[96]

M. Ruf, M. J. Weaver, S. B. van Dam, and R. Hanson, Phys. Rev. Applied 15, 024049 (2021)

2021
[97]

Pelton, Nature Photonics 9, 427 (2015)

M. Pelton, Nature Photonics 9, 427 (2015)

2015
[98]

Khriachtchev, Silicon Nanophotonics

L. Khriachtchev, Silicon Nanophotonics. Basic Principles, Present Status, and Perspectives (Jenny Stanford Publishing, 2016, 2016)

2016
[99]

Istrate and E

E. Istrate and E. H. Sargent, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 455 (2006)

2006
[100]

M. J. Burek, Y . Chu, M. S. Z. Liddy, P. Patel, J. Rochman, S. Meesala, W. Hong, Q. Quan, M. D. Lukin, and M. Loncar, 19 Nature Communications 5, 5718 (2014)

2014
[101]

Khanaliloo, M

B. Khanaliloo, M. Mitchell, A. C. Hryciw, and P. E. Barclay, Nano letters 15, 5131 (2015)

2015
[102]

Zhong, J

T. Zhong, J. Rochman, J. M. Kindem, E. Miyazono, and A. Faraon, Optics Express 24, 536 (2016)

2016
[103]

Rüsing, P

M. Rüsing, P. O. Weigel, J. Zhao, and S. Mookherjea, IEEE Nanotechnology Magazine 13, 18 (2019)

2019
[104]

M. Li, H. Liang, R. Luo, Y . He, J. Ling, and Q. Lin, Optica 6, 860 (2019)

2019
[105]

A. Boes, B. Corcoran, L. Chang, J. Bowers, and A. Mitchell, Laser & Photonics Reviews 12, 1700256 (2018)

2018
[106]

Z. Li, N. W. Rui, G. Lihachev, J. Zhang, Z. Tan, M. Churaev, N. Kuznetsov, A. Siddharth, M. J. Bereyhi, J. Riemensberger, and T. J. Kippenberg, Nature Comunications 14, 4856 (2023)

2023
[107]

Hunger, T

D. Hunger, T. Steinmetz, Y . Colombe, C. Deutsch, T. W. Hänsch, and J. Reichel, New Journal of Physics 12, 065038 (2010)

2010
[108]

A. Ortu, A. Holzäpfel, J. Etesse, and M. Afzelius, npj Quan- tum Information 8, 29 (2022)

2022
[109]

We note that we have included demonstra- tions in which single photons, attenuated laser pulses as well as strong laser pulses were stored

and without cavity [65, 108, 110], and 3-level AFC- based storage with [108, 110, 164] and without [153] spin control pulses. We note that we have included demonstra- tions in which single photons, attenuated laser pulses as well as strong laser pulses were stored. While it is...
[110]

Businger, A

M. Businger, A. Tiranov, K. T. Kaczmarek, S. Welinski, Z. Zhang, A. Ferrier, P. Goldner, and M. Afzelius, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 053606 (2020)

2020
[111]

Duranti, S

S. Duranti, S. Wengerowsky, L. Feldmann, A. Seri, C. B., and H. De Riedmatten, Optics Express 32, 26884 (2024)

2024
[112]

Dréau, A

A. Dréau, A. Tchebotareva, A. El Mahdaoui, C. Bonato, and R. Hanson, Phys. Rev. Applied 9, 064031 (2018)

2018
[113]

Tanzilli, W

S. Tanzilli, W. Tittel, M. Halder, O. Alibart, P. Baldi, N. Gisin, and H. Zbinden, Nature 437, 116 (2005)

2005
[114]

Merkel, A

B. Merkel, A. Ulanowski, and A. Reiserer, Phys. Rev. X 10, 041025 (2020)

2020
[115]

Maring, D

N. Maring, D. Lagos-Rivera, A. Lenhard, G. Heinze, and H. De Riedmatten, Optica 5, 507 (2018)

2018
[116]

Dutta, Y

S. Dutta, Y . Zhao, U. Saha, D. Farfurnik, E. A. Goldschmidt, and E. Waks, ACS Photonics 10, 1104 (2023)

2023
[117]

K. Xia, F. Sardi, C. Sauerzapf, T. Kornher, H.-W. Becker, Z. Kis, L. Kovacs, D. Dertli, J. Foglszinger, R. Kolesov, and J. Wrachtrup, Optica 9, 445 (2022)

2022
[118]

Simon, H

C. Simon, H. De Riedmatten, M. Afzelius, N. Sangouard, H. Zbinden, and N. Gisin, Physical Review Letters98, 190503 (2007)

2007
[119]

J. M. Kindem, A. Ruskuc, J. G. Bartholomew, J. Rochman, Y . Q. Huan, and A. Faraon, Nature 580, 201 (2020)

2020
[120]

Afzelius, C

M. Afzelius, C. Simon, H. de Riedmatten, and N. Gisin, Phys. Rev. A 79, 052329 (2009)

2009
[121]

J. Nunn, K. Reim, K. C. Lee, V . O. Lorenz, B. J. Sussman, I. A. Walmsley, and D. Jaksch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 260502 (2008)

2008
[122]

I. D. Abella, N. A. Kurnit, and S. R. Hartmann, Phys. Rev. 141, 391 (1966)

1966
[123]

A. Ortu, J. V . Rakonjac, A. Holzäpfel, A. Seri, S. Grandi, M. Mazzera, H. de Riedmatten, and M. Afzelius, Quantum Science and Technology 7, 035024 (2022)

2022
[124]

Jobez, N

P. Jobez, N. Timoney, C. Laplane, J. Etesse, A. Ferrier, P. Goldner, N. Gisin, and M. Afzelius, Phys. Rev. A 93, 032327 (2016)

2016
[125]

A. I. Lvovsky, B. C. Sanders, and W. Tittel, Nature photonics 3, 706 (2009)

2009
[126]

Sangouard, C

N. Sangouard, C. Simon, M. Afzelius, and N. Gisin, Phys. Rev. A 75, 032327 (2007)

2007
[127]

Businger, L

M. Businger, L. Nicolas, T. S. Mejia, A. Ferrier, P. Gold- ner, and M. Afzelius, Nature Communications 13 (2022), 10.1038/s41467-022-33929-y

2022 doi
[128]

Afzelius and C

M. Afzelius and C. Simon, Physical Review A 82, 022310 (2010)

2010
[129]

A. V . Gorshkov, A. André, M. D. Lukin, and A. S. Sørensen, Phys. Rev. A 76, 033805 (2007)

2007
[130]

Hétet, J

G. Hétet, J. J. Longdell, A. L. Alexander, P. K. Lam, and M. J. Sellars, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 023601 (2008)

2008
[131]

Jobez, I

P. Jobez, I. Usmani, N. Timoney, C. Laplane, N. Gisin, and M. Afzelius, New Journal of Physics 16, 083005 (2014)

2014
[132]

A. L. Alexander, J. J. Longdell, M. J. Sellars, and N. B. Man- son, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 043602 (2006)

2006
[133]

Kraus, W

B. Kraus, W. Tittel, N. Gisin, M. Nilsson, S. Kröll, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. A 73, 020302 (2006)

2006
[134]

Bonarota, J

M. Bonarota, J. Dajczgewand, A. Louchet-Chauvet, J.-L. L. Gouöt, and T. Chaneliére, Laser Physics 24, 094003 (2014)

2014
[135]

Damon, M

V . Damon, M. Bonarota, A. Louchet-Chauvet, T. Chanelière, and J.-L. L. Gouët, New Journal of Physics13, 093031 (2011)

2011
[136]

F. Könz, Y . Sun, C. W. Thiel, R. L. Cone, R. W. Equall, R. L. Hutcheson, and R. M. Macfarlane, Phys. Rev. B 68, 085109 (2003)

2003
[138]

Afzelius, I

M. Afzelius, I. Usmani, A. Amari, B. Lauritzen, A. Walther, C. Simon, N. Sangouard, J. Miná ˇr, H. de Riedmatten, N. Gisin, and S. Kröll, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 040503 (2010)

2010
[139]

Nicolas, M

L. Nicolas, M. Businger, T. Sanchez Mejia, A. Tiranov, T. Chanelière, E. Lafitte-Houssat, A. Ferrier, P. Gold- ner, and M. Afzelius, npj Quantum Information 9 (2023), 10.1038/s41534-023-00687-8

2023 doi
[140]

Liu, T.-X

C. Liu, T.-X. Zhu, M.-X. Su, Y .-Z. Ma, Z.-Q. Zhou, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Physical Review Letters 125, 260504 (2020)

2020
[141]

S. P. Horvath, M. K. Alqedra, A. Kinos, A. Walther, J. M. Dahlström, S. Kröll, and L. Rippe, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023099 (2021)

2021
[142]

Efficient and reversible optical-to- spin conversion for solid-state quantum memories,

J. Chen and M. Afzelius, “Efficient and reversible optical-to- spin conversion for solid-state quantum memories,” (2024)

2024
[143]

J. c. v. Miná ˇr, N. Sangouard, M. Afzelius, H. de Riedmatten, and N. Gisin, Phys. Rev. A 82, 042309 (2010)

2010
[144]

Jobez, C

P. Jobez, C. Laplane, N. Timoney, N. Gisin, A. Ferrier, P. Goldner, and M. Afzelius, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 230502 (2015)

2015
[145]

Gündo ˘gan, P

M. Gündo ˘gan, P. M. Ledingham, K. Kutluer, M. Mazzera, and H. de Riedmatten, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 230501 (2015)

2015
[146]

P. M. Ledingham, W. R. Naylor, J. J. Longdell, S. E. Beavan, and M. J. Sellars, Phys. Rev. A 81, 012301 (2010)

2010
[147]

Holzäpfel, J

A. Holzäpfel, J. Etesse, K. T. Kaczmarek, A. Tiranov, N. Gisin, and M. Afzelius, New Journal of Physics22, 063009 (2020)

2020
[148]

M. Hain, M. Stabel, and T. Halfmann, New Journal of Physics 24, 023012 (2022)

2022
[149]

Sekatski, N

P. Sekatski, N. Sangouard, N. Gisin, H. de Riedmatten, and M. Afzelius, Phys. Rev. A 83, 053840 (2011)

2011
[150]

M. U. Staudt, M. Afzelius, H. de Riedmatten, S. R. Hastings- Simon, C. Simon, R. Ricken, H. Suche, W. Sohler, and N. Gisin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 173602 (2007)

2007
[151]

Y . Wu, J. Liu, and C. Simon, Phys. Rev. A 101, 042301 (2020)

2020
[152]

Zhou, W.-B

Z.-Q. Zhou, W.-B. Lin, M. Yang, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 190505 (2012)

2012
[153]

de Riedmatten, M

H. de Riedmatten, M. Afzelius, M. U. Staudt, C. Simon, and N. Gisin, Nature 456, 773 (2008)

2008
[154]

Jin, Y .-Z

M. Jin, Y .-Z. Ma, Z.-Q. Zhou, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Sci- ence Bulletin 67, 676 (2022). 20

2022
[155]

J. V . Rakonjac, D. Lago-Rivera, A. Seri, M. Mazzera, S. Grandi, and H. de Riedmatten, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 210502 (2021)

2021
[157]

N. T. Arnold, M. Victora, M. E. Goggin, and P. G. Kwiat, Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering 12446 (2023)

2023
[158]

Clausen, I

C. Clausen, I. Usmani, F. Bussieres, N. Sangouard, M. Afzelius, H. de Riedmatten, and N. Gisin, Nature 469, 508 (2011)

2011
[159]

Saglamyurek, N

E. Saglamyurek, N. Sinclair, J. Jin, J. A. Slater, D. Oblak, F. Bussieres, M. George, R. Ricken, W. Sohler, and W. Tit- tel, Nature 469, 512 (2011)

2011
[160]

Sangouard, C

N. Sangouard, C. Simon, J. Minar, H. Zbinden, H. de Ried- matten, and N. Gisin, Phys. Rev. A 76, 050301 (R) (2007)

2007
[161]

Etesse, A

J. Etesse, A. Holzäpfel, A. Ortu, and M. Afzelius, Phys. Rev. A 103, 022618 (2021)

2021
[162]

S.-H. Wei, B. Jing, X.-Y . Zhang, J.-Y . Liao, H. Li, L.-X. You, Z. Wang, Y . Wang, G.-W. Deng, H.-Z. Song, D. Oblak, G.- C. Guo, and Q. Zhou, npj Quantum Information 10 (2024), 10.1038/s41534-024-00812-1

2024 doi
[163]

J. V . Rakonjac, G. Corrielli, D. Lago-Rivera, A. Seri, M. Mazzera, S. Grandi, R. Osellame, and H. de Riedmatten, Science Advances 8 (2022), 10.1126/sciadv.abn3919

2022 doi
[164]

Craiciu, M

I. Craiciu, M. Lei, J. Rochman, J. M. Kindem, J. G. Bartholomew, E. Miyazono, T. Zhong, N. Sinclair, and A. Faraon, Phys. Rev. Appl. 12, 024062 (2019)

2019
[165]

Ma, Y .-Z

Y . Ma, Y .-Z. Ma, Z.-Q. Zhou, C.-F. Li, and G. Guo, Nature Communications 12, 2381 (2021)

2021
[166]

Saglamyurek, J

E. Saglamyurek, J. Jin, V . B. Verma, M. D. Shaw, F. Marsili, S. W. Nam, D. Oblak, and W. Tittel, Nature Photonics 9, 83 (2015)

2015
[167]

Clausen, F

C. Clausen, F. Bussières, M. Afzelius, and N. Gisin, Physical Review Letters 108, 190503 (2012)

2012
[168]

Gündo ˘gan, P

M. Gündo ˘gan, P. M. Ledingham, A. Almasi, M. Cristiani, and H. de Riedmatten, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 190504 (2012)

2012
[169]

J. Jin, E. Saglamyurek, M. Grimau Puigibert, V . Verma, F. Marsili, S. W. Nam, D. Oblak, and W. Tittel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 140501 (2015)

2015
[170]

Tiranov, J

A. Tiranov, J. Lavoie, A. Ferrier, P. Goldner, V . B. Verma, S. W. Nam, R. P. Mirin, A. E. Lita, F. Marsili, H. Herrmann, C. Silberhorn, N. Gisin, M. Afzelius, and F. Bussières, Optica 2, 279 (2015)

2015
[171]

Bussières, C

F. Bussières, C. Clausen, A. Tiranov, B. Korzh, V . B. Verma, S. W. Nam, F. Marsili, A. Ferrier, P. Goldner, H. Herrmann, C. Silberhorn, W. Sohler, M. Afzelius, and N. Gisin, Nature Photonics 8, 775 (2014)

2014
[172]

Lago-Rivera, J

D. Lago-Rivera, J. V . Rakonjac, S. Grandi, and H. d. Ried- matten, Nature Communications 14 (2023), 10.1038/s41467- 023-37518-5

2023 doi
[173]

Qubit telepor- tation between a memory-compatible photonic time-bin qubit and a solid-state quantum network node,

M. Iuliano, M.-C. Slater, A. J. Stolk, M. J. Weaver, T. Chakraborty, E. Loukiantchenko, G. C. d. Amaral, N. Al- fasi, M. O. Sholkina, W. Tittel, and R. Hanson, “Qubit telepor- tation between a memory-compatible photonic time-bin qubit and a solid-state quantum network node,” (2024)

2024
[174]

Liu, X.-M

X. Liu, X.-M. Hu, T.-X. Zhu, C. Zhang, Y .-X. Xiao, J.- L. Miao, Z.-W. Ou, P.-Y . Li, B.-H. Liu, Z.-Q. Zhou, C.- F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Nature Communications 15 (2024), 10.1038/s41467-024-52912-3

2024 doi
[175]

J. V . Rakonjac, S. Grandi, S. Wengerowsky, D. Lago-Rivera, F. Appas, and H. de Riedmatten, Optica Quantum 1, 94 (2023)

2023
[176]

Usmani, C

I. Usmani, C. Clausen, F. Bussières, N. Sangouard, M. Afzelius, and N. Gisin, Nature Photonics 6, 234 (2012)

2012
[177]

Grimau Puigibert, M

M. Grimau Puigibert, M. F. Askarani, J. H. Davidson, V . B. Verma, M. D. Shaw, S. W. Nam, T. Lutz, G. C. Amaral, D. Oblak, and W. Tittel, Physical Review Research 2, 013039 (2020)

2020
[178]

Lago-Rivera, S

D. Lago-Rivera, S. Grandi, J. V . Rakonjac, A. Seri, and H. de Riedmatten, Nature 594, 37 (2021)

2021
[179]

X. Liu, J. Hu, Z.-F. Li, X. Li, P.-Y . Li, P.-J. Liang, Z.-Q. Zhou, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Nature 594, 41 (2021)

2021
[180]

Usmani, M

I. Usmani, M. Afzelius, H. de Riedmatten, and N. Gisin, Na- ture Communications 1, 1 (2010)

2010
[181]

Tang, Z.-Q

J.-S. Tang, Z.-Q. Zhou, Y .-T. Wang, Y .-L. Li, X. Liu, Y .- L. Hua, Y . Zou, S. Wang, D.-Y . He, G. Chen, Y .-N. Sun, Y . Yu, M.-F. Li, G.-W. Zha, H.-Q. Ni, Z.-C. Niu, C.- F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Nature Communications 6 (2015), 10.1038/ncomms9652

2015 doi
[182]

and spectral [51, 183] degrees of freedom, as well as a combination of all three degrees-of-freedom [184]. Fur- thermore, storage efficiencies around 40% have been reported [121, 185] with the crystal in a free-space configuration, and cavity-enhanced storage efficiencies of 5...
[183]

Bonarota, J.-L

M. Bonarota, J.-L. L. Gouët, and T. Chanelière, New Journal of Physics 13, 013013 (2011)

2011
[184]

Zhou, Y .-L

Z.-Q. Zhou, Y .-L. Hua, X. Liu, G. Chen, J.-S. Xu, Y .-J. Han, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 070502 (2015)

2015
[185]

A. Seri, D. Lago-Rivera, A. Lenhard, G. Corrielli, R. Osel- lame, M. Mazzera, and H. de Riedmatten, Physical Review Letters 123, 080502 (2019)

2019
[186]

Yang, Z.-Q

T.-S. Yang, Z.-Q. Zhou, Y .-L. Hua, X. Liu, Z.-F. Li, P.-Y . Li, Y . Ma, C. Liu, P.-J. Liang, X. Li, et al., Nature communica- tions 9, 3407 (2018)

2018
[187]

Amari, A

A. Amari, A. Walther, M. Sabooni, M. Huang, S. Kröll, M. Afzelius, I. Usmani, B. Lauritzen, N. Sangouard, H. de Riedmatten, and N. Gisin, Journal of Luminescence 130, 1579 (2010)

2010
[188]

Sabooni, Q

M. Sabooni, Q. Li, S. Kröll, S., and L. Rippe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 133604 (2013)

2013
[189]

J. H. Davidson, P. Lefebvre, J. Zhang, D. Oblak, and W. Tittel, Physical Review A 101, 042333 (2020)

2020
[190]

M. P. Hedges, J. J. Longdell, Y . Li, and M. J. Sellars, Nature 465, 1052 (2010)

2010
[191]

K. R. Ferguson, S. E. Beavan, J. J. Longdell, and M. J. Sellars, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 020501 (2016)

2016
[192]

C. K. Duda, K. R. Ferguson, R. L. Ahlefeldt, M. P. Hedges, and M. J. Sellars, Phys. Rev. A 107, L030602 (2023)

2023
[193]

Laplane, P

C. Laplane, P. Jobez, J. Etesse, N. Gisin, and M. Afzelius, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 210501 (2017)

2017
[194]

Kutluer, M

K. Kutluer, M. Mazzera, and H. de Riedmatten, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 210502 (2017)

2017
[195]

Kutluer, E

K. Kutluer, E. Distante, B. Casabone, S. Duranti, M. Mazzera, and H. de Riedmatten, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 030501 (2019)

2019
[196]

Lauritzen, J

B. Lauritzen, J. c. v. Miná ˇr, H. de Riedmatten, M. Afzelius, N. Sangouard, C. Simon, and N. Gisin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 080502 (2010)

2010
[197]

M. F. Askarani, M. G. Puigibert, T. Lutz, V . B. Verma, M. D. Shaw, S. W. Nam, N. Sinclair, D. Oblak, and W. Tittel, Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 054056 (2019)

2019
[198]

Zhang, B

X. Zhang, B. Zhang, S. Wei, H. Li, J. Liao, C. Li, G. Deng, Y . Wang, H. Song, L. You, B. Jing, F. Chen, G. Guo, and Q. Zhou, Science Advances9 (2023), 10.1126/sciadv.adf4587

2023 doi
[199]

Jiang, W

M.-H. Jiang, W. Xue, Q. He, Y .-Y . An, X. Zheng, W.-J. Xu, Y .- B. Xie, Y . Lu, S. Zhu, and X.-S. Ma, Nature Communications 14, 6995 (2023)

2023
[200]

M. U. Staudt, S. R. Hastings-Simon, M. Afzelius, D. Jaccard, W. Tittel, and N. Gisin, Optics Communications 266, 720 (2006)

2006
[201]

S. R. Hastings-Simon, B. Lauritzen, M. U. Staudt, J. L. M. van Mechelen, C. Simon, H. de Riedmatten, M. Afzelius, and N. Gisin, Physical Review B 78, 085410 (2008)

2008
[202]

Lauritzen, S

B. Lauritzen, S. R. Hastings-Simon, H. de Riedmatten, M. Afzelius, and N. Gisin, Phys. Rev. A 78, 043402 (2008)

2008
[203]

Ohlson, K

N. Ohlson, K. Mohan, and S. Kröll, Optics Communications 201, 1 (2002). 21

2002
[204]

Groot-Berning, T

K. Groot-Berning, T. Kornherr, G. Jacob, F. Stopp, S. T. Dawkins, R. Kolesov, J. Wrachtrup, K. Singer, and F. Schmidt-Kaler, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 106802 (2019)

2019
[205]

Kinos, L

A. Kinos, L. Rippe, S. Kröll, and A. Walther, Phys. Rev. A 104, 052624 (2021)

2021
[206]

Kinos, L

A. Kinos, L. Rippe, A. Walther, and S. Kröll, Phys. Rev. A 105, 032608 (2022)

2022
[207]

Preskill, Quantum 2, 79 (2018)

J. Preskill, Quantum 2, 79 (2018)

2018
[208]

Walther, B

A. Walther, B. Julsgaard, L. Rippe, Y . Ying, and S. Kröll, Physica Scripta T137, 014009 (2009)

2009
[209]

Wesenberg, K

J. Wesenberg, K. Molmer, L. Rippe, and S. Kröll, Phys. Rev. A 75, 012304 (2007)

2007
[210]

Kimiaee Asadi, N

F. Kimiaee Asadi, N. Lauk, S. Wein, N. Sinclair, C. O’Brien, and C. Simon, Quantum 2, 93 (2018)

2018
[212]

M. K. Alqedra, C. Deshmukh, S. Liu, D. Serrano, S. P. Hor- vath, S. Rafie-Zinedine, A. Abdelatief, L. Rippe, S. Kröll, B. Casabone, A. Ferrier, A. Tallaire, P. Goldner, H. de Ried- matten, and A. Walther, Phys. Rev. B 108, 075107 (2023)

2023
[213]

A. C. J. Wade, M. Mattioli, and K. Mølmer, Phys. Rev. A 94, 053830 (2016)

2016
[214]

Welte, B

S. Welte, B. Hacker, S. Daiss, S. Ritter, and G. Rempe, Phys. Rev. X 8, 011018 (2018)

2018
[215]

Gottesman and I

D. Gottesman and I. L. Chuang, Nature 402, 390 (1999)

1999
[216]

M. T. Uysal, M. Raha, S. Chen, C. M. Phenicie, S. Ourari, M. Wang, C. G. Van de Walle, V . V . Dobrovitski, and J. D. Thompson, PRX Quantum 4, 010323 (2023)

2023
[217]

Ruskuc, C.-J

A. Ruskuc, C.-J. Wu, J. Rochman, J. Choi, and A. Faraon, Nature 602, 408 (2022)

2022
[218]

Deutsch, A

D. Deutsch, A. Ekert, R. Jozsa, C. Macchiavello, S. Popescu, and A. Sanpera, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2818 (1996)

1996
[219]

W. Dur, H. J. Briegel, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. A 59, 169 (1999)

1999
[220]

Bratzik, S

S. Bratzik, S. Abruzzo, H. Kampermann, and D. Bruß, Phys. Rev. A 87, 062335 (2013)

2013
[221]

Krastanov, V

S. Krastanov, V . V . Albert, and L. Jiang, Quantum 3, 123 (2019)

2019
[222]

Jiang, J

L. Jiang, J. M. Taylor, K. Nemoto, W. J. Munro, R. Van Meter, and M. D. Lukin, Phys. Rev. A 79, 032325 (2009)

2009
[223]

W. J. Munro, K. A. Harrison, A. M. Stephens, S. J. Devitt, and K. Nemoto, Nat. Photon 4, 792 (2010)

2010
[224]

Rolander, A

A. Rolander, A. Kinos, and A. Walther, Phys. Rev. A 105, 062604 (2022)

2022
[225]

Op- tical single-shot readout of spin qubits in silicon,

A. Gritsch, A. Ulanowski, J. Pforr, and A. Reiserer, “Op- tical single-shot readout of spin qubits in silicon,” (2024), arXiv:2405.05351 [quant-ph]

2024 arXiv
[226]

M. Raha, S. T. Chen, C. M. Phenicie, S. Ourari, A. M. Dibos, and J. D. Thompson, Nat. Commun. 11, 1605 (2020)

2020
[227]

C. W. Chou, H. de Riedmatten, D. Felinto, S. V . Polyakov, S. J. van Enk, and H. J. Kimble, Nature 438, 828 (2005)

2005
[228]

J. Jin, J. A. Slater, E. Saglamyurek, N. Sinclair, M. George, R. Ricken, D. Oblak, W. Sohler, and W. Tittel, Nature Com- munications 4, 2386 (2013)

2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [211]

Debnath, A

K. Debnath, A. H. Kiilerich, and K. Mølmer, Phys. Rev. A 103, 043705 (2021)

work page 2021

[2] [1]

Schrödinger, Math

E. Schrödinger, Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 31, 555 (1935)

1935

[3] [2]

J. S. Bell, Physics 1, 195 (1964)

1964

[4] [3]

Aspect, P

A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett.47, 460 (1981)

1981

[5] [4]

Tittel, J

W. Tittel, J. Brendel, H. Zbinden, and N. Gisin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998)

1998

[6] [5]

Weihs, T

G. Weihs, T. Jennewein, C. Simon, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5039 (1998)

1998

[7] [6]

M. A. Rowe, D. Kielpinski, V . Meyer, C. A. Sackett, W. M. Itano, C. Monroe, and D. J. Wineland, Nature 409, 791 (2001)

2001

[8] [7]

Hensen, H

B. Hensen, H. Bernien, A. Dréau, A. Reiserer, N. Kalb, M. Blok, J. Ruitenberg, R. F. L. Vermeulen, R. N. Schouten, C. Abellán, W. Amaya, V . Pruneri, M. W. Mitchell, M. Markham, D. M. Twitchen, D. Elkouss, S. Wehner, T. H. Taminiau, and R. Hanson, Nature 526, 682 (2015)

2015