Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Open Eyes, Then Reason: Fine-grained Visual Mathematical Understanding in MLLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.06430 v1 pith:3CGXK4FN submitted 2025-01-11 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords visualmathematicalmllmsfine-grainedmodelsunderstandingdatasetsfeature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Current multimodal large language models (MLLMs) often underperform on mathematical problem-solving tasks that require fine-grained visual understanding. The limitation is largely attributable to inadequate perception of geometric primitives during image-level contrastive pre-training (e.g., CLIP). While recent efforts to improve math MLLMs have focused on scaling up mathematical visual instruction datasets and employing stronger LLM backbones, they often overlook persistent errors in visual recognition. In this paper, we systematically evaluate the visual grounding capabilities of state-of-the-art MLLMs and reveal a significant negative correlation between visual grounding accuracy and problem-solving performance, underscoring the critical role of fine-grained visual understanding. Notably, advanced models like GPT-4o exhibit a 70% error rate when identifying geometric entities, highlighting that this remains a key bottleneck in visual mathematical reasoning. To address this, we propose a novel approach, SVE-Math (Selective Vision-Enhanced Mathematical MLLM), featuring a geometric-grounded vision encoder and a feature router that dynamically adjusts the contribution of hierarchical visual feature maps. Our model recognizes accurate visual primitives and generates precise visual prompts tailored to the language model's reasoning needs. In experiments, SVE-Math-Qwen2.5-7B outperforms other 7B models by 15% on MathVerse and is compatible with GPT-4V on MathVista. Despite being trained on smaller datasets, SVE-Math-7B achieves competitive performance on GeoQA, rivaling models trained on significantly larger datasets. Our findings emphasize the importance of incorporating fine-grained visual understanding into MLLMs and provide a promising direction for future research.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MIRROR: Learning from the Other View for Multi-Modal Reasoning

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An RL method that selects the best-performing view of each geometry problem as an internal teacher and distills it into weaker views improves VLM reasoning accuracy and consistency.

  2. Seeing is Not Reasoning: MVPBench for Graph-based Evaluation of Multi-path Visual Physical CoT

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new multi-image benchmark and graph-based scoring method show that MLLMs produce weak, poorly-grounded chains of thought on visual physics tasks, and that RL post-training can degrade spatial reasoning.

  3. RoadBench: Benchmarking MLLMs on Fine-Grained Spatial Understanding and Reasoning under Urban Road Scenarios

    cs.CV 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new 9,121-case benchmark of road-marking tasks shows most multimodal LLMs perform near or below simple rule-based baselines in fine-grained urban spatial reasoning.

  4. Plane Geometry Problem Solving with Multi-modal Reasoning: A Survey

    cs.CV 2025-05 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey of plane geometry problem solving that classifies methods into an encoder-decoder framework and analyzes hallucination and data leakage in current benchmarks.

Pith tools