Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 1 cited by

Three-dimensional transport of solids in a protoplanetary disk containing a growing giant planet

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A growing giant planet does not fully isolate the inner disk: gas falling onto the planet sweeps small, well-coupled dust across the planet's gap, and up to 30% of grains smaller than 100 $\mu$m cross from the outer to inner disk within 1…

desk verdict The 3D tracking is a real advance and the meridional-advection crossing mechanism holds up qualitatively, but the quoted crossing fractions lean heavily on an under-tested Schmidt-number-unity diffusion law and some integration details are sloppy. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.07520 v1 pith:I2YDB2FV submitted 2025-01-13 astro-ph.EP

Eric Van Clepper , Ellen M. Price , Fred J. Ciesla This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords protoplanetarydisksplanet-diskinteractiongapopeningdusttransportMonteCarloparticletrackingmeridionalflowsisotopicreservoirsJupiterformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether an embedded giant planet, usually pictured as a barrier between inner and outer protoplanetary disk material, actually lets solids cross its gap. Combining 3D hydrodynamic gas simulations with Monte Carlo particle tracking, it finds that once the planet exceeds roughly the mass needed to isolate pebbles, small dust grains that are tightly coupled to the gas are swept across the gap by gas flowing onto the planet. Up to 30% of grains smaller than 100 $\mu$m filter from the outer disk to the inner disk within 1 Myr, and 10 $\mu$m dust can move outward as well. If correct, this means Jupiter's growth mixed, rather than strictly separated, the isotopic reservoirs recorded in meteorites, with the amount of mixing set by grain size, turbulent viscosity, and embryo mass.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the planet's 3D meridional gas circulation: outward along the midplane, inward at altitude. The particle integrator carries the argument: each grain is moved by stellar and planetary gravity, gas drag with a locally evaluated Stokes number, and a stochastic diffusion step whose amplitude comes from $D=\nu/(1+\mathrm{St}^2)$ with $\nu=\alpha c_s H$, i.e. a unit Schmidt number. Because small grains diffuse to altitudes where the flow is inward, and because their Stokes number rises as gas density drops inside the gap, the model predicts which sizes remain coupled long enough to be funneled past the planet. It also yields radial residence times, showing where grains pile up at one or more outer pressure bumps.

What would settle it

Rerun the particle code with the diffusion relation changed to $D = \nu/(\mathrm{Sc}(1+\mathrm{St}^2))$ for $\mathrm{Sc}=3$ and recompute the 1-Myr crossing fraction for 10 $\mu$m grains at a 300 $M_\oplus$ embryo; if the fraction stays near the reported ~30%, the mechanism is not tied to the unit-Schmidt-number assumption, but if it drops below a few percent, the reported mixing rates are falsified as the natural prediction of this model.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the 3D structure of the gas flow around an embedded giant planet reverses the usual picture of gap physics. Near the midplane the gas flows outward from the planet, but at higher altitudes it flows inward onto the planet. Small, well-coupled grains that diffuse vertically into these upper layers are entrained in the inward advective flow, pass within a few hundred Jupiter radii of the planet yet outside its accretion envelope, and can be deposited on orbits interior to the planet. For planets above the pebble isolation mass, conventionally placed near $30\,M_\oplus$ in the fiducial disk and efficient by $100\,M_\oplus$, this lets up to 30% of sub-100-$\mu$m particles cross outward to inward within 1 Myr while millimeter- and centimeter-sized pebbles remain trapped at the pressure bump. The same meridional circulation carries 10 $\mu$m dust from the inner disk outward, and in low-viscosity disks the massive planet creates multiple outer pressure bumps that may support a third isotopic reservoir.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative crossing fractions rest on the assumption that dust diffuses in the gas exactly as fast as momentum does (a unit Schmidt number) and that the diffusion is an isotropic random walk; if diffusion is weaker or anisotropic, fewer small grains would be lofted into the inward-flowing layers and the 10–30% crossing fractions would shrink.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Above the pebble isolation mass a giant planet acts as a size-selective filter rather than a closed barrier: grains smaller than about 100 $\mu$m leak across the gap in both directions while larger pebbles stay trapped at the pressure bump.
  • The extent of mixing changes as Jupiter grows: large grains drift inward freely before the isolation mass, sub-100-$\mu$m grains cross efficiently once the embryo reaches roughly $100\,M_\oplus$, and at the highest masses only 10 $\mu$m dust remains coupled enough to cross.
  • In low-viscosity disks a single massive planet can create multiple outer pressure bumps, so dust may pile up in several rings sourced from different parts of the disk, plausibly preserving a third isotopic reservoir.
  • Grains that cross are funneled within a few hundred Jupiter radii of the planet, so late-arriving inner-disk solids would have been thermally processed near the accreting protoplanet, potentially altering their volatile and isotopic content.
  • In exoplanetary systems, an outer giant planet does not necessarily cut off the supply of small dust to the inner disk, so inner super-Earth formation could still receive feedstock after the outer planet opens a gap.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the real dust diffusivity is lower than gas momentum diffusivity (Schmidt number greater than one), the reported 10–30% crossing fractions are upper limits; rerunning the same code with $\mathrm{Sc}=2$\u2013$5$ would bracket the mixing efficiency.
  • The advection-funneling mechanism is not Jupiter-specific and should operate around any sufficiently massive planet in a viscous disk, meaning isotopic reservoir separation in other planetary systems may also be leaky.
  • A testable consequence of the funneling effect is a spatial correlation between isotopic anomalies and thermal-processing signatures in small CAIs that crossed the gap, which could be searched for in individual inclusions.
  • Planet migration would shift the balance: an inward-migrating planet sees a relative outward gas flow, which should suppress inward crossing and enhance outward transport of small dust; adding migration to the particle tracking is the natural next test.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper combines 3D FARGO3D hydrodynamic simulations of a protoplanetary disk containing an embedded giant planet (0-300 Earth masses at 5.2 au) with a Monte Carlo post-processing particle tracking method to study the transport of dust grains from 10 micron to 1 cm. The central claim is that for planets above the pebble isolation mass, small, well-coupled grains can be entrained in the 3D meridional gas advection onto the planet and cross the gap from the outer disk to the inner disk (and, for 10 micron grains, also outward). The paper reports up to ~30% crossing fractions for grains smaller than 100 micron over 1 Myr, identifies multiple outer-disk dust pileups in low-viscosity disks, and interprets the results in terms of the NC-CC meteorite isotopic dichotomy and a possible tertiary reservoir. Section 4.4 acknowledges limitations: constant gas structure, fixed planet orbit, finite particle number, and no grain growth or fragmentation.

Significance. If the quantitative results hold, the paper provides a concrete 3D mechanism for exchanging small solids across a giant planet's gap, with direct implications for the interpretation of isotopic reservoirs in the solar nebula and for the filtering of dust in exoplanetary disks. The methodological contribution is noteworthy: coupling a high-resolution 3D gas simulation with a particle tracker that adjusts the Stokes number as particles move through varying gas density is a meaningful extension of prior 2D and single-fluid studies. The qualitative mechanism is convincingly illustrated by the example trajectory in Figure 6, which shows a 10 micron grain following the meridional inflow and passing just outside the planetary envelope into the inner disk. However, the quantitative crossing fractions presented in Figures 7 and 8 rest on an assumed dust diffusivity (Schmidt number unity) and on an unspecified initial vertical particle distribution; these assumptions are not stress-tested, so the numerical percentages should be treated with caution until clarified or supplemented with sensitivity runs.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.2 (Eq. 6) and Section 3.2 (Figures 7-8)] The reported 10-30% crossing fractions for 10-100 micron grains depend directly on the assumed particle diffusivity D = D_g/(1+St^2) with D_g = alpha c_s H, i.e., a Schmidt number of unity. The advective crossing mechanism shown in Figure 6 requires grains to be present at high altitude (z ~ 2H, where the meridional inflow is strong). With a more conservative Schmidt number of 3-10, the equilibrium dust scale height H_d/H ~ sqrt(alpha/[Sc(alpha+St)]) drops from near unity to roughly 0.6-0.3, and the population at 2H falls by orders of magnitude. The paper gives no sensitivity test for Sc or for the gas diffusivity, and this is load-bearing because the mixing percentages in Section 4 are used to argue for specific levels of NC-CC exchange. The authors should either add a sensitivity study (e.g., Sc = 3 and 10) or explicitly reframe the reported percentages as illustrative upper limits.
  2. [Section 3.2, paragraph beginning 'To explore the fraction...'] The normalization of the crossing fraction is ambiguous. The sentence 'additional particles are integrated for each planet mass until 1000 total particles drift inwards of 5.2 au by 1 Myr' suggests that the number of crossing particles is fixed at 1000, which would make the reported crossing fraction depend on the stopping rule. Please specify the exact numerator and denominator used for the fractions in Figure 8, and clarify whether particles that leave the simulation bounds ('Out of Bounds' in Figure 7) are included in the denominator. Without this information, the 30% figure cannot be independently evaluated.
  3. [Section 3.2 (initial conditions) and Section 2.2] The initial vertical distribution of the particles is not stated. If 'evenly distributed in the 7 to 12 au region' means a uniform distribution in z up to the simulation boundary (about 3 pressure scale heights), the initial condition overpopulates high altitudes relative to a physically motivated settled distribution. Because the crossing mechanism relies on grains starting at, or diffusing to, high z, this choice can inflate the crossing efficiency. Please specify the initial z distribution and test the sensitivity to an initially settled distribution with dust scale height H_d derived from the same diffusion model.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Section 2.2, Eq. (3)] The random displacement uses p_x, p_y, p_z drawn from a uniform distribution on [-1,1] rather than a Gaussian. The variance is correctly normalized (2D Delta t per dimension), but the uniform distribution has bounded support and no tails; over many steps the central limit theorem applies, but the difference could matter for short integrations or near boundaries. A brief justification or reference would be helpful.
  2. [Section 2.2, Eqs. (18)-(21)] The timestep coefficients xi = 1e-6 and zeta = 1e-5 are stated to have been tested at an order of magnitude smaller with no significant difference, which is good; however, the reported convergence test is not shown. A sentence describing the metric used for 'no significant difference' would make this statement more quantitative.
  3. [Section 2.1 (mesh) and Section 3.2 (boundary losses)] The vertical domain extends about 3 scale heights; particles that diffuse above this are removed. Because the advective inflow region may extend to several scale heights, the paper should comment on whether the vertical boundary is high enough to capture the full inflow region, and whether the 'Out of Bounds' loss affects the inferred crossing statistics.
  4. [Section 3.3, text near Figure 9] The sentence 'This affect can also be seen in 5' contains a typo ('affect' should be 'effect') and 'in 5' should be 'in Figure 5'.
  5. [Figure 13 caption] The caption reads 'In the high viscosity case, the solids diffuse more vertically and tend to concentrate near the gap. In the high viscosity case, solids much more closely follow the gas advection...'; the second sentence should presumably read 'low viscosity case'.
  6. [References] The citation 'Price et al. in press' in Section 2.2 does not appear in the reference list; please update to a published or arXiv reference.
  7. [Appendix A, Eq. (A1)] The exponential term has mismatched parentheses: 'exp[(1 - sin(theta)^{-2gamma})/(2gamma h^2]' is missing a closing parenthesis. Please check the formula and ensure it matches the standard hydrostatic density profile.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the crossing fractions are simulation outputs, not fitted quantities, and the self-citations are methodological rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

No circular step can be exhibited from the paper's own equations or citations. The central claim—that gas advection onto the planet can carry small, well-coupled solids across the gap—is a direct output of a Monte Carlo particle integration through a FARGO3D gas snapshot, not a quantity fitted to reproduce itself. The diffusion law is an openly stated modeling assumption with an external citation: "The particle diffusivity is related to the gas diffusivity using the relationship given in Youdin & Lithwick (2007): D = Dg/(1+St^2)" and "we assume a Schmidt number of unity." This assumption shapes the quantitative crossing fractions, but an assumption is not circularity; the paper does not tune Sc or any other parameter to force the reported 10–30% crossing fractions. The particle-tracking technique is taken from Ciesla (2010, 2011), a same-group citation, but it is a method with independent support and is not used to define the target result; the gas simulations use the public FARGO3D code and standard disk initial conditions (Sigma0 ~ 210 g cm^-2, T0 ~ 118 K, alpha = 10^-3 or 10^-4). The "funneling effect" is a descriptive name for the trajectory mechanism shown in Figure 6, not a renamed known result. The sentence about integrating additional particles until 1000 total particles drift inward is a sampling detail; as ambiguous as it is, the reported fractions vary with mass and size ("up to 30% of particles smaller than 100 um filter from the outer disk to the inner disk by 1 Myr"), so the crossing statistic is not fixed at unity by construction. Any concern about the Schmidt-number assumption is a robustness or correctness caveat, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results depend on standard disk structure assumptions (Σ∝r^{-1}, T∝r^{-1/2}, α-viscosity) and on the diffusion model D = ν/(1+St^2). No new particles, forces, or fitted constants are introduced; the paper's quantitative output (crossing fractions, residence times) is sensitive to the choice of α and the Schmidt number.

free parameters (5)
  • disk viscosity α = 10^-3 and 10^-4
    Sets the gas viscosity and particle diffusivity (D_g = α c_s H); chosen from observed disk turbulence estimates, not fitted to the results.
  • particle size s = 1 cm, 1 mm, 100 µm, 10 µm
    Chosen to cover CAIs and dust in the solar nebula; the crossing behavior is a function of size.
  • coupling Stokes number cutoff = 10^-3
    Particles with St < 10^-3 are assumed perfectly coupled (drag force zero, v = v_gas) to speed up integration; the authors tested lowering by an order of magnitude with no significant difference.
  • surface density normalization Σ0 = 210 g/cm^2 at 5.2 au
    Sets the disk mass; taken from typical minimum-mass solar nebula models, not fitted.
  • planet mass M_pl = 0, 1, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 300 M⊕
    Grid of embryo masses to represent Jupiter's growth stages.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The disk is vertically isothermal with T ∝ r^{-1/2} and surface density Σ ∝ r^{-1} (Section 2.1)
    Standard disk model; not derived, and the temperature profile affects the gas scale height and pressure structure that drives dust drift.
  • domain assumption The gas reaches a steady state and is time-averaged over 10 orbits for particle integration (Section 2.1)
    Particle tracking uses a static gas field; disk evolution, planet migration, and vortex transients are ignored, which the authors list as caveats.
  • domain assumption Dust diffusivity equals gas viscosity divided by (1+St^2), i.e., Schmidt number unity (Eq. 6)
    Directly sets the strength of turbulent diffusion of particles; a different Schmidt number changes crossing fractions.
  • ad hoc to paper The random displacement in Eq. (3) is drawn from a uniform distribution on [-1,1] rather than a Gaussian
    This is a modeling choice in the integration scheme; a Gaussian would give different rare large displacements and could affect the tails of the crossing distribution.
  • domain assumption Epstein drag regime applies for all particle sizes
    Valid for sizes smaller than the mean free path, which holds for the sizes and densities in this disk.
  • standard math Dust back-reaction on the gas and particle-particle interactions are neglected
    Test-particle approximation; appropriate for low dust-to-gas ratios.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Three-dimensional transport of solids in a protoplanetary disk containing a growing giant planet." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/I2YDB2FV

@misc{pith2026250107520,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Three-dimensional transport of solids in a protoplanetary disk containing a growing giant planet},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/I2YDB2FV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.07520}
}
abstract

We present the results of combined hydrodynamic and particle tracking post-processing modeling to study the transport of small dust in a protoplanetary disk containing an embedded embryo in 3D. We use a suite of FARGO3D hydrodynamic simulations of disks containing a planetary embryo varying in mass up to 300 $M_\oplus$ on a fixed orbit in both high and low viscosity disks. We then simulate solid particles through the disk as a post-processing step using a Monte Carlo integration, allowing us to track the trajectories of individual particles as they travel throughout the disk. We find that gas advection onto the planet can carry small, well-coupled solids across the gap opened in the disk by the embedded planet for planetary masses above the pebble isolation mass. This mixing between the inner and outer disk can occur in both directions, with solids in the inner disk mixing to the outer disk as well. Additionally, in low viscosity disks, multiple pile-ups in the outer disk may preserve isotopic heterogeneities, possibly providing an outermost tertiary isotopic reservoir. Throughout Jupiter's growth, the extent of mixing between isotopic reservoirs varied depending on dust size, gas turbulence, and the Jovian embryo mass.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.07520 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Azimuthally averaged densities for the same set of embedded planets as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Azimuthally averaged midplane azimuthal veloc￾ity (top) and surface density relative to a disk with no planet (bottom). The azimuthal velocity is given as percent devia￾tion from keplerian, δvkep = (vϕ − vkep)/vkep, and the hor￾izontal dashed line is at δvkep = 0%. In the bottom panel, the gap edge is defined as where Σ/Σ0 = 0.5. The region where we start particles in our simulation is shown between the two vertical… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Results of FARGO3D simulation of disks con￾taining a 100, 200, and 300 M⊕ (top to bottom) embedded planet showing the gas density and velocity. The left panels show the Cartesian midplane gas structure of the disk. The right panels show the radial and vertical gas density and gas advection near the planet, averaged over ϕ = 0 ± π/8. Here, the arrow color corresponds to the advection of the gas relative to the planet… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A selection of particle trajectories, showing the radial location of 20 particles as a function of time. Each subplot represents the evolution of particles in a disk containing different mass planetary embryos (columns) and different size grains (rows). Each line is co…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: An example trajectory of a solid particle that crosses from the outer disk to the inner disk. The top panel shows the path followed by the particle as the black dashed line projected onto the midplane of the disk, with 4 locations and particle velocities labeled. The p…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Of solids initialized at 7 au (the same population as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The fraction of solids starting at 7 au that cross the orbit of the planet. For the 1 cm and 1 mm sized peb￾bles, drift across the orbit of the planet occurs over longer timescales as the planet mass increases. Some grains are lost to accretion onto the planet, indicat…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The starting and ending locations of solid par￾ticles that begin both inside and outside of the planet after 100 kyr of evolution. The planet location is shown by dashed grey lines, with the gap shown by the thick grey regions. A 1:1 line is shown by the black dotted l…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Average residence time for different sizes of solids as a function of radial location in the disk. Residence times are shown for disks containing planetary embryos of mass 100 M⊕ (left) and 300 M⊕ (right). For particles smaller than 1 mm, residence times show a two pe…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Comparison of azimuthally averaged disk struc￾ture for α = 10−3 (solid lines) and 10−4 (dashed lines). In general, gaps in disks with lower α values are both deeper and wider. In both cases, variations in the density remain in the outer disk, leading to multiple areas…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Azimuthally averaged residence times for the largest (top) and smallest (bottom) solids considered in high viscosity (left) and low viscosity (right) disks containing a 300 M⊕ planet. The contour lines show the surrounding gas density and are placed logarithmically, w…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Water gas discs in exo-asteroid belts

    astro-ph.EP 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

    Water vapour from exo-asteroid belts around solar-mass and heavier stars can supply ocean-scale water to inner planets and remain detectable for tens of Myr with current facilities.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    YUvh0@ _ 0 YZ g/

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    2021

  4. [4]

    Alarcón, F., & Bergin, E. A. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 967, 144, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3d57

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3d57 2024

  5. [5]

    M., Huang, J., Pérez, L

    Andrews, S. M., Huang, J., Pérez, L. M., et al. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 869, L41, 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf741

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaf741 2018

  6. [6]

    Armitage, P. J. 2017, arXiv:astro-ph/0701485. http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0701485

    arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 859, 118, 10.3847/1538-4357/aabf8c

    Bae, J., & Zhu, Z. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 859, 118, 10.3847/1538-4357/aabf8c

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aabf8c 2018

  8. [8]

    2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 850, 201, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9705

    Bae, J., Zhu, Z., & Hartmann, L. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 850, 201, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9705

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa9705 2017

Show all 109 references
  1. [9]

    2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 615, A175, 10.1051/0004-6361/201832791

    Barbato, D., Sozzetti, A., Desidera, S., et al. 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 615, A175, 10.1051/0004-6361/201832791

    2018 doi

  2. [10]

    N., & Ciesla, F

    Barnett, M. N., & Ciesla, F. J. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 925, 141, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4417

    2022 doi

  3. [11]

    Benítez-Llambay, P., & Masset, F. S. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 223, 11, 10.3847/0067-0049/223/1/11

    2016 doi

  4. [12]

    B., & Ciesla, F

    Bergner, J. B., & Ciesla, F. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 919, 45, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0fd7

    2021 doi

  5. [13]

    2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 523, 55, 10.1093/mnras/stad1405

    Binkert, F., Szulágyi, J., & Birnstiel, T. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 523, 55, 10.1093/mnras/stad1405

    2023 doi

  6. [14]

    2012, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 539, A148, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118136

    Birnstiel, T., Klahr, H., & Ercolano, B. 2012, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 539, A148, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118136

    2012 doi

  7. [15]

    2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 623, A88, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834489

    Bitsch, B., Izidoro, A., Johansen, A., et al. 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 623, A88, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834489

    2019 doi

  8. [16]

    2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 612, A30, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731931

    Bitsch, B., Morbidelli, A., Johansen, A., et al. 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 612, A30, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731931

    2018 doi

  9. [17]

    D., Cridland, A

    Bosman, A. D., Cridland, A. J., & Miguel, Y. 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 632, L11, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936827

    2019 doi

  10. [18]

    Boss, A. P. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 836, 53, 10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/53

    2017 doi

  11. [19]

    2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 884, 56, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab40a4

    ---. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 884, 56, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab40a4

    2019 doi

  12. [20]

    2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 12

    Brasser, R. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 12

    2020

  13. [21]

    L., Knutson, H

    Bryan, M. L., Knutson, H. A., Lee, E. J., et al. 2019, The Astronomical Journal, 157, 52, 10.3847/1538-3881/aaf57f

    2019 doi

  14. [22]

    L., & Lee, E

    Bryan, M. L., & Lee, E. J. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 968, L25, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad5013

    2024 doi

  15. [23]

    A., et al

    Budde, G., Burkhardt, C., Brennecka, G. A., et al. 2016, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 454, 293, 10.1016/j.epsl.2016.09.020

    2016 doi

  16. [24]

    2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 849, 30, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa91d0

    Chambers, J. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 849, 30, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa91d0

    2017 doi

  17. [25]

    2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 914, 102, 10.3847/1538-4357/abfaa4

    ---. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 914, 102, 10.3847/1538-4357/abfaa4

    2021 doi

  18. [26]

    Ciesla, F. J. 2007, Science, 318, 613, 10.1126/science.1147273

    2007 doi

  19. [27]

    2010, The Astrophysical Journal, 723, 514, 10.1088/0004-637X/723/1/514

    ---. 2010, The Astrophysical Journal, 723, 514, 10.1088/0004-637X/723/1/514

    2010 doi

  20. [28]

    2011, The Astrophysical Journal, 740, 9, 10.1088/0004-637X/740/1/9

    ---. 2011, The Astrophysical Journal, 740, 9, 10.1088/0004-637X/740/1/9

    2011 doi

  21. [29]

    N., Bizzarro, M., Krot, A

    Connelly, J. N., Bizzarro, M., Krot, A. N., et al. 2012, Science, 338, 651, 10.1126/science.1226919

    2012 doi

  22. [30]

    N., Davis, S

    Cuzzi, J. N., Davis, S. S., & Dobrovolskis, A. R. 2003, Icarus, 166, 385, 10.1016/j.icarus.2003.08.016

    2003 doi

  23. [31]

    J., Kalyaan, A., & Alexander, C

    Desch, S. J., Kalyaan, A., & Alexander, C. M. O. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 238, 11, 10.3847/1538-4365/aad95f

    2018 doi

  24. [32]

    2021, The Astrophysical Journal

    Doi, K. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal

    2021

  25. [33]

    M., & Li, H

    Drążkowska, J., Li, S., Birnstiel, T., Stammler, S. M., & Li, H. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 885, 91, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab46b7

    2019 doi

  26. [34]

    M., & Birnstiel, T

    Drążkowska, J., Stammler, S. M., & Birnstiel, T. 2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 647, A15, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039925

    2021 doi

  27. [35]

    Duffell, P. C. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal, 807, L11, 10.1088/2041-8205/807/1/L11

    2015 doi

  28. [36]

    2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 889, 16, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5b0f

    ---. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 889, 16, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5b0f

    2020 doi

  29. [37]

    C., Haiman, Z., MacFadyen, A

    Duffell, P. C., Haiman, Z., MacFadyen, A. I., D'Orazio, D. J., & Farris, B. D. 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 792, L10, 10.1088/2041-8205/792/1/L10

    2014 doi

  30. [38]

    P., Birnstiel, T., Huang, J., et al

    Dullemond, C. P., Birnstiel, T., Huang, J., et al. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 869, L46, 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf742

    2018 doi

  31. [39]

    T., Sheikh, A., Opara, D., et al

    Dunham, E. T., Sheikh, A., Opara, D., et al. 2023, Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 58, 643, 10.1111/maps.13975

    2023 doi

  32. [40]

    2015, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 574, A52, 10.1051/0004-6361/201424837

    Dürmann, C., & Kley, W. 2015, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 574, A52, 10.1051/0004-6361/201424837

    2015 doi

  33. [41]

    N., et al

    Ebert, S., Nagashima, K., Krot, A. N., et al. 2024, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 646, 119010, 10.1016/j.epsl.2024.119010

    2024

  34. [42]

    A., et al

    Ebert, S., Render, J., Brennecka, G. A., et al. 2018, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 498, 257, 10.1016/j.epsl.2018.06.040

    2018 doi

  35. [43]

    Eriksson, L. E. J., Yang, C.-C., & Armitage, P. J. 2024, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, slae110, 10.1093/mnrasl/slae110

    2024 doi

  36. [44]

    2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 610, A24, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731978

    Fedele, D., Tazzari, M., Booth, R., et al. 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 610, A24, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731978

    2018 doi

  37. [45]

    M., Simon, J

    Flaherty, K., Hughes, A. M., Simon, J. B., et al. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 895, 109, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8cc5

    2020 doi

  38. [46]

    2024, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 532, 363, 10.1093/mnras/stae1480

    ---. 2024, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 532, 363, 10.1093/mnras/stae1480

    2024 doi

  39. [47]

    2024, UV -processing of icy pebbles in the outer parts of VSI -turbulent disks, arXiv, 10.48550/arXiv.2412.01698

    Flores-Rivera, L., Lambrechts, M., Gavino, S., et al. 2024, UV -processing of icy pebbles in the outer parts of VSI -turbulent disks, arXiv, 10.48550/arXiv.2412.01698

    2024 doi arXiv

  40. [48]

    2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 832, 105, 10.3847/0004-637X/832/2/105

    Fung, J., & Chiang, E. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 832, 105, 10.3847/0004-637X/832/2/105

    2016 doi

  41. [49]

    2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 841, L17, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa72a2

    Gerber, S., Burkhardt, C., Budde, G., Metzler, K., & Kleine, T. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 841, L17, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa72a2

    2017 doi

  42. [50]

    M., & Lin, M.-K

    Hammer, M., Kratter, K. M., & Lin, M.-K. 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 466, 3533, 10.1093/mnras/stw3000

    2017 doi

  43. [51]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., Walt, S. J. v. d., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    2020 doi

  44. [52]

    P., et al

    Haugbølle, T., Weber, P., Wielandt, D. P., et al. 2019, The Astronomical Journal, 158, 55, 10.3847/1538-3881/ab1591

    2019 doi

  45. [53]

    J., Lunine, J

    Helled, R., Stevenson, D. J., Lunine, J. I., et al. 2022, Icarus, 378, 114937, 10.1016/j.icarus.2022.114937

    2022

  46. [54]

    2022, Science Advances, 8, eadd8141, 10.1126/sciadv.add8141

    Hopp, T., Dauphas, N., Abe, Y., et al. 2022, Science Advances, 8, eadd8141, 10.1126/sciadv.add8141

    2022 doi

  47. [55]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90, 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    2007 doi

  48. [56]

    N., et al

    Izidoro, A., Dasgupta, R., Raymond, S. N., et al. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 10.1038/s41550-021-01557-z

    2021 doi

  49. [57]

    F., Facchini, S., Rosotti, G

    Izquierdo, A. F., Facchini, S., Rosotti, G. P., Van Dishoeck, E. F., & Testi, L. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 928, 2, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac474d

    2022 doi

  50. [58]

    S., Low, M.-M

    Johansen, A., Oishi, J. S., Low, M.-M. M., et al. 2007, Nature, 448, 1022, 10.1038/nature06086

    2007 doi

  51. [59]

    D., Muto, T., Tanaka, H., et al

    Kanagawa, K. D., Muto, T., Tanaka, H., et al. 2016, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 68

    2016

  52. [60]

    D., Tanaka, H., Muto, T., Tanigawa, T., & Takeuchi, T

    Kanagawa, K. D., Tanaka, H., Muto, T., Tanigawa, T., & Takeuchi, T. 2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 448, 994, 10.1093/mnras/stv025

    2015 doi

  53. [61]

    M., & Youdin, A

    Krapp, L., Kratter, K. M., & Youdin, A. N. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 928, 156, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5899

    2022 doi

  54. [62]

    M., Youdin, A

    Krapp, L., Kratter, K. M., Youdin, A. N., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 973, 153, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad644a

    2024 doi

  55. [63]

    S., Burkhardt, C., Budde, G., & Kleine, T

    Kruijer, T. S., Burkhardt, C., Budde, G., & Kleine, T. 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114, 6712, 10.1073/pnas.1704461114

    2017 doi

  56. [64]

    S., Kleine, T., & Borg, L

    Kruijer, T. S., Kleine, T., & Borg, L. E. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 32, 10.1038/s41550-019-0959-9

    2020 doi

  57. [65]

    2014, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 572, A35, 10.1051/0004-6361/201423814

    Lambrechts, M., Johansen, A., & Morbidelli, A. 2014, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 572, A35, 10.1051/0004-6361/201423814

    2014 doi

  58. [66]

    A., et al

    Lambrechts, M., Morbidelli, A., Jacobson, S. A., et al. 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 627, A83, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834229

    2019 doi

  59. [67]

    Lau, T. C. H., Birnstiel, T., Drążkowska, J., & Stammler, S. M. 2024, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 688, A22, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450464

    2024 doi

  60. [68]

    2024, Gas dynamics around a Jupiter -mass planet I

    Lega, E., Benisty, M., Cridland, A., et al. 2024, Gas dynamics around a Jupiter -mass planet I . Influence of protoplanetary disk properties, arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.12233

    2024 arXiv

  61. [69]

    2021, Science, 371, 365

    Lichtenberg, T., Drążkowska, J., Schönbächler, M., Golabek, G., & Hands, T. 2021, Science, 371, 365

    2021

  62. [70]

    2022, Science Advances, 8, eabm3045, 10.1126/sciadv.abm3045

    Liu, B., Johansen, A., Lambrechts, M., Bizzarro, M., & Haugbølle, T. 2022, Science Advances, 8, eabm3045, 10.1126/sciadv.abm3045

    2022 doi

  63. [71]

    Liu, B., & Ormel, C. W. 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 615, A138, 10.1051/0004-6361/201732307

    2018 doi

  64. [72]

    2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 968, 62, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4035

    Maeda, N., Ohtsuki, K., Suetsugu, R., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 968, 62, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4035

    2024 doi

  65. [73]

    2000, Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, 141, 165, 10.1051/aas:2000116

    Masset, F. 2000, Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, 141, 165, 10.1051/aas:2000116

    2000 doi

  66. [74]

    2021, Nature Astronomy, 6, 72, 10.1038/s41550-021-01517-7

    Morbidelli, A., Baillié, K., Batygin, K., et al. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 6, 72, 10.1038/s41550-021-01517-7

    2021 doi

  67. [75]

    2023, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 675, A75, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346868

    Morbidelli, A., Batygin, K., & Lega, E. 2023, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 675, A75, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346868

    2023 doi

  68. [76]

    2014, Icarus, 232, 266, 10.1016/j.icarus.2014.01.010

    Morbidelli, A., Szulágyi, J., Crida, A., et al. 2014, Icarus, 232, 266, 10.1016/j.icarus.2014.01.010

    2014 doi

  69. [77]

    D., Drążkowska, J., Van Der Marel, N., Ciesla, F

    Mulders, G. D., Drążkowska, J., Van Der Marel, N., Ciesla, F. J., & Pascucci, I. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 920, L1, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac2947

    2021 doi

  70. [78]

    2024, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 626, 118521, 10.1016/j.epsl.2023.118521

    Nesvorný, D., Dauphas, N., Vokrouhlický, D., Deienno, R., & Hopp, T. 2024, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 626, 118521, 10.1016/j.epsl.2023.118521

    2024

  71. [79]

    W., & Liu, B

    Ormel, C. W., & Liu, B. 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 615, A178, 10.1051/0004-6361/201732562

    2018 doi

  72. [80]

    F., Teague, R., et al

    Paneque-Carreño, T., Izquierdo, A. F., Teague, R., et al. 2024, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 684, A174, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347757

    2024 doi

  73. [81]

    J., Booth, R

    Petrovic, H. J., Booth, R. A., & Clarke, C. J. 2024, Material Transport in Protoplanetary Discs with Massive Embedded Planets , arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.16245

    2024 arXiv

  74. [82]

    2012, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 545, A81, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219315

    Pinilla, P., Benisty, M., & Birnstiel, T. 2012, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 545, A81, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219315

    2012 doi

  75. [83]

    J., Ménard, F., et al

    Pinte, C., Price, D. J., Ménard, F., et al. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 860, L13, 10.3847/2041-8213/aac6dc

    2018 doi

  76. [84]

    2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 1109, 10.1038/s41550-019-0852-6

    Pinte, C., van der Plas, G., Ménard, F., et al. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 1109, 10.1038/s41550-019-0852-6

    2019 doi

  77. [85]

    2019, The Astronomical Journal, 158, 15, 10.3847/1538-3881/ab1f88

    Pérez, S., Casassus, S., Baruteau, C., et al. 2019, The Astronomical Journal, 158, 15, 10.3847/1538-3881/ab1f88

    2019 doi

  78. [86]

    L., & Davidson, J

    Schrader, D. L., & Davidson, J. 2022, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 589, 117552, 10.1016/j.epsl.2022.117552

    2022

  79. [87]

    L., Nagashima, K., Davidson, J., et al

    Schrader, D. L., Nagashima, K., Davidson, J., et al. 2020, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 282, 133, 10.1016/j.gca.2020.05.014

    2020 doi

  80. [88]

    I., & Sunyaev, R

    Shakura, N. I., & Sunyaev, R. A. 1973, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 24, 337. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1973A&A....24..337S

    1973

  81. [89]

    M., Lichtenberg, T., Drążkowska, J., & Birnstiel, T

    Stammler, S. M., Lichtenberg, T., Drążkowska, J., & Birnstiel, T. 2023, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 670, L5, 10.1051/0004-6361/202245512

    2023 doi

  82. [90]

    2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 924, 1, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac32d1

    Szulágyi, J., Binkert, F., & Surville, C. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 924, 1, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac32d1

    2022 doi

  83. [91]

    2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 460, 2853, 10.1093/mnras/stw1160

    Szulágyi, J., Masset, F., Lega, E., et al. 2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 460, 2853, 10.1093/mnras/stw1160

    2016 doi

  84. [92]

    2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 782, 65, 10.1088/0004-637X/782/2/65

    Szulágyi, J., Morbidelli, A., Crida, A., & Masset, F. 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 782, 65, 10.1088/0004-637X/782/2/65

    2014 doi

  85. [93]

    2022, Science, 375, 1011, 10.1126/science.abj8624

    Tachibana, S., Sawada, H., Okazaki, R., et al. 2022, Science, 375, 1011, 10.1126/science.abj8624

    2022 doi

  86. [94]

    Takeuchi, T., & Lin, D. N. C. 2002, The Astrophysical Journal, 581, 1344, 10.1086/344437

    2002 doi

  87. [95]

    Tanigawa, T., Maruta, A., & Machida, M. N. 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 784, 109, 10.1088/0004-637X/784/2/109

    2014 doi

  88. [96]

    Teague, R., Bae, J., & Bergin, E. A. 2019, Nature, 574, 378, 10.1038/s41586-019-1642-0

    2019 doi

  89. [97]

    A., Birnstiel, T., & Foreman-Mackey, D

    Teague, R., Bae, J., Bergin, E. A., Birnstiel, T., & Foreman-Mackey, D. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 860, L12, 10.3847/2041-8213/aac6d7

    2018 doi

  90. [98]

    2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 910, 70, 10.3847/1538-4357/abd9c8

    Van Kooten, E., Schiller, M., Moynier, F., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 910, 70, 10.3847/1538-4357/abd9c8

    2021 doi

  91. [99]

    Warren, P. H. 2011, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 311, 93, 10.1016/j.epsl.2011.08.047

    2011 doi

  92. [100]

    Weber, P., Benítez-Llambay, P., Gressel, O., Krapp, L., & Pessah, M. E. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 854, 153, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaab63

    2018 doi

  93. [101]

    Weidenschilling, S. J. 1977, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 180, 57, 10.1093/mnras/180.2.57

    1977 doi

  94. [102]

    Yang, L., & Ciesla, F. J. 2012, Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 47, 99, 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2011.01315.x

    2012

  95. [103]

    2023, Science, 379, eabn7850, 10.1126/science.abn7850

    Yokoyama, T., Nagashima, K., Nakai, I., et al. 2023, Science, 379, eabn7850, 10.1126/science.abn7850

    2023 doi

  96. [104]

    N., & Goodman, J

    Youdin, A. N., & Goodman, J. 2005, The Astrophysical Journal, 620, 459, 10.1086/426895

    2005 doi

  97. [105]

    N., & Lithwick, Y

    Youdin, A. N., & Lithwick, Y. 2007, Icarus, 192, 588, 10.1016/j.icarus.2007.07.012

    2007 doi

  98. [106]

    2018, The Astronomical Journal, 156, 92, 10.3847/1538-3881/aad22a

    Zhu, W., & Wu, Y. 2018, The Astronomical Journal, 156, 92, 10.3847/1538-3881/aad22a

    2018 doi

  99. [107]

    M., Rafikov, R

    Zhu, Z., Stone, J. M., Rafikov, R. R., & Bai, X.-n. 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 785, 122, 10.1088/0004-637X/785/2/122

    2014 doi

  100. [108]

    I., & Wordsworth, R

    Öberg, K. I., & Wordsworth, R. 2019, The Astronomical Journal, 158, 194, 10.3847/1538-3881/ab46a8

    2019 doi

  101. [109]

    I., Guzmán, V

    Öberg, K. I., Guzmán, V. V., Walsh, C., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 257, 1, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac1432

    2021 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.