Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 51 references

Magnon-induced scalar spin chirality in Kagome and honeycomb ferromagnets

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Thermally excited magnons create a nonzero scalar spin chirality in collinear ferromagnets on Kagome and honeycomb lattices when Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions are present.

desk verdict A real new mechanism—thermal magnons producing scalar spin chirality in collinear DMI ferromagnets—but the quantitative comparability claim is softer than the abstract suggests. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.07906 v1 pith:GEXFY2O5 submitted 2025-01-14 cond-mat.mes-hall

Nanse Esaki , Gyungchoon Go , Se Kwon Kim This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords scalarspinchiralitymagnonKagomelatticehoneycombDzyaloshinskii-MoriyainteractioncollinearferromagnetthermalHalleffectHolstein-Primakofftransformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that thermally excited magnons can induce a finite scalar spin chirality even in two-dimensional ferromagnets whose ground state is collinear, contrary to the usual assumption that chirality requires noncoplanar spin textures. The mechanism is the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (DMI), which breaks the effective time-reversal symmetry of the magnon Hamiltonian and makes the momentum-space chirality profile no longer odd, so the Bose-weighted sum over the Brillouin zone does not vanish. The authors derive analytic low-temperature expressions for the chirality in Kagome and honeycomb lattices, Eqs. (12) and (23), showing it grows with temperature and DMI strength, and they estimate that for realistic materials the magnitude can rival chirality values found in noncoplanar magnets. This matters because it broadens the class of materials where chiral physics and chirality-driven transport can be expected.

What carries the argument

The key machinery is the momentum-space scalar spin chirality matrix chi-hat_k, whose expectation value in magnon band eigenstates is weighted by the Bose distribution function. Under time reversal the magnon Hamiltonian transforms as h_k -> h*_{-k}, while the chirality matrix obeys chi-hat_k = -chi-hat*_{-k}, so in a time-reversal-symmetric system the chirality profile is odd in momentum and the Brillouin-zone sum vanishes. The DMI breaks this symmetry and introduces an even component near the band bottom; the analytic results follow from expanding the lowest-band eigenstate and the chirality profile near the Gamma point and integrating the thermal factor with $k^{4}$ (Kagome) or $k^{6}$ (honeycomb) weight.

What would settle it

Compute the scalar spin chirality in the same spin model including the next-order 1/S Holstein-Primakoff corrections; if the correction is comparable in magnitude to the quadratic result, or changes its sign, at temperatures where Eqs. (12) and (23) predict chirality about 0.01, the quantitative claim collapses. Alternatively, measure the temperature dependence of the chirality via the topological Hall effect in Cu(1,3-bdc) below 1 K and look for the predicted $T^{3}$ scaling; its absence would falsify the mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that collinear ferromagnets with DMI acquire a nonzero thermal expectation value of the scalar spin chirality, chi_eq, at finite temperatures. In the Kagome case, the paper finds chi_eq approximately equal to minus $\sqrt$(3) D_z divided by (9 pi $\sqrt$($J^{2}$ + $D_z^{2}$) S), times exp(-$\beta$(2KS + g mu_B H)) over ($\beta$ J S)^3, while in the honeycomb case the leading term is $\sqrt$(3) D_z over (pi J S) times exp(-$\beta$(2KS + g mu_B H)) over ($\beta$ J S)^4. Both expressions show the chirality is proportional to the perpendicular DMI component D_z and increases with temperature; numerically, using material parameters for Cu(1,3-bdc) and CrBr3, the predicted chirality reaches values on the order of 0.1, comparable to the chirality of noncoplanar Kagome antiferromagnets with canting angles around one degree.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation treats magnons as non-interacting by cutting the spin-wave expansion at quadratic order in the Holstein-Primakoff bosons, so the results stand or fall on magnon-magnon interactions being negligible in the temperature range where the chirality becomes sizable.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Collinear ferromagnets with DMI should exhibit a measurable scalar spin chirality at low temperatures, with magnitude comparable to noncoplanar magnets, making them candidate platforms for chirality-driven phenomena.
  • The chirality follows distinct power laws in temperature, T^3 for Kagome and T^4 for honeycomb, which provides a sharp experimental signature.
  • The result implies that collinear spin systems can host chirality-induced transport, such as a topological Hall effect for conduction electrons or a phonon thermal Hall effect via skew scattering.
  • Candidate materials include the Kagome ferromagnet Cu(1,3-bdc) and honeycomb ferromagnets such as CrBr3, CrI3, CrSiTe3, and CrGeTe3.
  • The DMI is strictly necessary: in its absence the chirality vanishes exactly, so the effect is tied to broken time-reversal symmetry in the magnon sector.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A general principle suggested by this work is that any collinear magnet whose magnon Hamiltonian has a Berry curvature and broken time-reversal symmetry should also exhibit thermal scalar spin chirality, linking the magnon thermal Hall effect to a spontaneous chiral spin texture in momentum space.
  • A testable extension is to measure the temperature dependence of the topological Hall contribution in collinear ferromagnets and check whether it follows the predicted T^3 or T^4 scaling rather than the exponential activation alone.
  • The quadratic Holstein-Primakoff truncation likely sets the limit of validity; including 1/S corrections at higher temperatures may shift the magnitude, and comparing such a calculation with the analytic formula would delineate where the effect is robust.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies two-dimensional ferromagnets on the kagome and honeycomb lattices described by a Heisenberg Hamiltonian with easy-axis anisotropy, out-of-plane Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions, and an applied magnetic field. It argues that although the classical ground state is collinear and the zero-temperature scalar spin chirality vanishes, thermally excited magnons in the DMI-broken magnon Hamiltonian generate a finite SSC at finite temperatures. Using a Holstein-Primakoff expansion truncated at quadratic order, the authors derive analytic low-temperature formulas for the SSC in the kagome case, Eq. (12), and in the honeycomb case, Eq. (23), and support them with numerical band-structure and SSC-profile calculations. They then use material parameters for Cu(1,3-bdc) and CrBr3 to claim that the induced SSC can be comparable in magnitude to the SSC of non-coplanar kagome antiferromagnets.

Significance. If the result is correct, the paper establishes a simple and potentially general mechanism for finite-temperature scalar spin chirality in collinear magnets, with consequences for electron and phonon transport. The symmetry argument is robust: without DMI the chirality profile is odd in momentum and the thermal sum vanishes, while DMI breaks the effective time-reversal symmetry of the magnon Hamiltonian and gives a nonzero result. The low-temperature analytic derivations in Appendix A are transparent, and the numerical and analytic results agree in the appropriate low-temperature regime (Figs. 3(b) and 5(b)). The predictions are falsifiable: the SSC scales linearly with D_z, vanishes with the exponential of the anisotropy/field gap, and follows T^3 (kagome) and T^4 (honeycomb) power laws. The main weakness is that the quantitative comparison to non-coplanar kagome antiferromagnets is made in a temperature regime where the quadratic Holstein-Primakoff truncation has no controlled error estimate.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. II C and Abstract] The claim that the magnon-induced SSC is comparable to that of non-coplanar kagome antiferromagnets (χKAFM ~ 0.045) rests on evaluating Eq. (12) at T around 4–5 K for the Cu(1,3-bdc) parameters. At these temperatures the results lie outside the dilute-magnon regime: with S = 1/2 and k_B T ~ 0.3–0.4 meV comparable to J = 0.6 meV, the thermal magnon density is of order 0.3 per site, so the quadratic Holstein-Primakoff truncation in Eq. (4) has no small parameter. The paper provides no estimate of 1/S or magnon-magnon interaction corrections. I therefore do not consider the quantitative comparability claim to be established, although the qualitative mechanism is sound. Please add a controlled estimate of the corrections, for example a next-order 1/S calculation or a classical Monte Carlo benchmark at these temperatures, or soften the headline claim.
  2. [Appendix A, Eqs. (12) and (23), Figs. 3(b) and 5(b)] The derivations replace polylogarithms by their leading exponential: Li3(e^{-βΔ}) ≈ e^{-βΔ} and similarly for Li4. This requires β(2KS + gμB H) ≫ 1. For the kagome parameters used in Fig. 3(b), K = 0 and H = 0.05 T give a gap of only about 0.07 K, so over the plotted range 0.1–1 K the argument of the polylogarithm is not small; the approximation has an estimated error of 10–20%. The same concern applies to Eq. (23) for CrBr3, where the gap 2KS is also small on the temperature scale of Fig. 5(b). The analytic comparison should either use the exact polylogarithm expression, or the stated agreement should be restricted to temperatures where the exponential approximation is controlled, or the validity condition in the text should be revised accordingly.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II C and Sec. III C, Figs. 2 and 4] The text says that in Fig. 2(b) and Fig. 4(b) the SSC profile is an odd function of k; the panels showing SSC profiles are actually Fig. 2(c)/(d) and Fig. 4(c)/(d), while Fig. 2(b) and Fig. 4(b) show band structures with DMI. Please correct the panel references.
  2. [Appendix A] There are small typographical errors in Appendix A: 'focucing' should be 'focusing' and 'Brilluin zone' should be 'Brillouin zone'.
  3. [Sec. II B, Eq. (10)] The text states k_BT ⪅ 2KS + gμB H as the low-temperature limit for Eq. (12); for the parameters of Fig. 3 this inequality is satisfied only below about 0.1 K, so the stated regime should be made consistent with the polylogarithm approximation discussed above.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the SSC is derived from the stated spin Hamiltonian with fixed parameters, and the sole self-citation is to a formalism that the paper re-derives explicitly.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The model Hamiltonian (1) defines the spin system; the Holstein-Primakoff expansions in Eqs. (4) and (16) produce the magnon Hamiltonians from the same fixed inputs J, K, D, and H, which are either material parameters or model parameters and are never fitted to the target SSC. The SSC expectation values in Eqs. (10)-(11) and (21)-(22) are the standard thermal averages of the explicitly written bilinear SSC operators in Eqs. (8)-(9) and (19)-(20). The analytic expressions, Eqs. (12) and (23), are derived in Appendix A by explicit low-energy expansion of the same magnon Hamiltonian and are validated against numerical diagonalization; they are not imposed or fitted to the SSC data. The comparison to non-coplanar Kagome antiferromagnets uses the external canting-angle benchmark from Ref. [35], not an input to the calculation. The only self-citation, Ref. [33], is used to motivate formulating SSC in the magnon eigenbasis; because the SSC matrices and thermal-averaging formulas are fully written out in this paper, that citation is not load-bearing. No predicted quantity enters the definition or fitting of any model parameter, and no uniqueness theorem or prior same-author result is invoked to force the outcome. The quadratic Holstein-Primakoff truncation is a stated approximation rather than a circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All model parameters (J, K, S, H, D_z) are taken from experiments on Cu(1,3-bdc) and CrBr3 or are varied as control parameters; none are fit to the target SSC. The calculation assumes noninteracting magnons and a collinear ground state. No new particles, forces, or entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Holstein-Primakoff expansion truncated at quadratic order
    Used in Sec. II B (Eq. (4)) and Sec. III B (Eq. (16)) to derive the magnon Hamiltonian; neglects magnon interactions.
  • standard math Bose-Einstein statistics for the magnon occupation
    Used in Eqs. (10), (11), (21), (22) for the thermal factor rho(epsilon) = 1/(exp(beta epsilon)-1).
  • domain assumption Collinear ferromagnetic ground state along z
    Assumed in Sec. II A and III A; the Hamiltonian (1) with easy-axis anisotropy and/or magnetic field stabilizes the fully polarized state, and the DMI energy vanishes for all spins along z.
  • domain assumption DMI vectors are out-of-plane, D_ij = D z-hat, with a uniform sign convention
    The model (Eq. (1)) and the effective time-reversal breaking of the magnon Hamiltonian depend on this orientation; different DMI orientations would change the symmetry analysis.
  • domain assumption SSC is defined on nearest-neighbor triangles in Kagome and next-nearest-neighbor triangles in honeycomb
    For honeycomb, nearest-neighbor triangles do not exist; the authors choose NNN triangles motivated by the analogy to the Haldane model (Sec. III A). The computed observable depends on this choice.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Magnon-induced scalar spin chirality in Kagome and honeycomb ferromagnets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GEXFY2O5

@misc{pith2026250107906,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Magnon-induced scalar spin chirality in Kagome and honeycomb ferromagnets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GEXFY2O5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.07906}
}
read the original abstract

The scalar spin chirality (SSC), defined as a triple product of spins, is essential for describing noncoplanar spin structures and understanding chiral physics in magnetic systems. Traditionally, SSC has been discussed primarily in the context of noncoplanar ground-state spin configurations at zero temperature, as collinear spin systems are generally thought to lack SSC. Consequently, whether the SSC can emerge at finite temperatures in spin systems with collinear ground states remains an open question and has yet to be fully understood. In this study, we theoretically demonstrate that thermally excited magnons can induce SSC even in collinear spin systems. By considering 2D ferromagnets on Kagome and honeycomb lattices, we demonstrate that the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions (DMI) which break the effective time-reversal symmetry in the magnon Hamiltonian can lead to finite SSC at finite temperatures. Using a simple spin model, we show both numerically and analytically that the SSC increases with the magnitude of DMI and temperature. Furthermore, calculations based on realistic material parameters reveal that the magnon-induced SSC can achieve a magnitude comparable to those observed in non-coplanar spin configurations. These findings suggest that SSC plays a significant role even in collinear spin systems, providing new insights into the chiral physics of magnetic materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.07906 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic figure of Kagome (a) and Honeycomb (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Magnon band structure and SSC profile in the case [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Temperature and DMI dependence of the magnon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Temperature and DMI dependence of the magnon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Magnon band structure and SSC profile in the case of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [33]

    A first theoretical realization of honeycomb topological magnon insulator,

    SA Owerre, “A first theoretical realization of honeycomb topological magnon insulator,” J. Phys.: Condens. Mat- ter 28, 386001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [32]

    Realization of the Haldane- Kane-Mele model in a system of localized spins,

    Se Kwon Kim, H´ ector Ochoa, Ricardo Zarzuela, and Yaroslav Tserkovnyak, “Realization of the Haldane- Kane-Mele model in a system of localized spins,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 227201 (2016)

    work page 2016

  3. [1]

    (12)) Here we derive the analytical expression of the magnon-induced SSC (12) by focucing only on the contribution near the band bottom

    Kagome ferromagnet case (Eq. (12)) Here we derive the analytical expression of the magnon-induced SSC (12) by focucing only on the contribution near the band bottom. The lowest eigenenergy and eigenstate of the Hamiltonian (5) around Γ are given by [11] ϵ1,k ≃ J Sk2 + 2KS + gµBH, (A1) and |u1,k⟩ ≃ 1 Wk   λ2 k − cos2 k2 λ2 k cos k1 + cos k2 cos k3 λ2 k ...

    work page

  4. [2]

    Honeycomb ferromagnet case (Eq. (23)) The lowest eigenenergy and eigenstate of the Hamiltonian (16) are given by E1(k) = ˜ϵ − |R| (A5) and |u1(k)⟩ = 1p 2R(R + Rz) −Rx + iRy Rz + R ! , (A6) respectively, where R = ( Rx, Ry, Rz) with Rx = −J SP3 j=1 cos(k · cj), Ry = J SP3 j=1 sin(k · cj), and Rz = −2DzS P3 j=1 sin(k · dj). Combining Eqs. (19) and (A6) and ...

    work page

  5. [3]

    Chi- ral spin states and superconductivity,

    Xiao-Gang Wen, Frank Wilczek, and Anthony Zee, “Chi- ral spin states and superconductivity,” Phys. Rev. B 39, 11413 (1989)

    work page 1989

  6. [4]

    Topological orbital magnetization and emergent Hall effect of an atomic-scale spin lattice at a surface,

    Markus Hoffmann, J Weischenberg, Bertrand Dup´ e, Franck Freimuth, Paolo Ferriani, Yuriy Mokrousov, and Stefan Heinze, “Topological orbital magnetization and emergent Hall effect of an atomic-scale spin lattice at a surface,” Phys. Rev. B 92, 020401 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [5]

    Chirality-driven orbital magnetic moments as a new probe for topological magnetic structures,

    Manuel dos Santos Dias, Juba Bouaziz, Mohammed Bouhassoune, Stefan Bl¨ ugel, and Samir Lounis, “Chirality-driven orbital magnetic moments as a new probe for topological magnetic structures,” Nat. Com- mun. 7, 13613 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [6]

    Role of Berry phase theory for describing orbital magnetism: From magnetic heterostructures to topological orbital ferromagnets,

    J-P Hanke, Frank Freimuth, Ashis Kumar Nandy, Hong- bin Zhang, Stefan Bl¨ ugel, and Yuriy Mokrousov, “Role of Berry phase theory for describing orbital magnetism: From magnetic heterostructures to topological orbital ferromagnets,” Phys. Rev. B 94, 121114 (2016)

    work page 2016

Show all 51 references
  1. [7]

    Engineering chiral and topological orbital magnetism of domain walls and skyrmions,

    Fabian R Lux, Frank Freimuth, Stefan Bl¨ ugel, and Yuriy Mokrousov, “Engineering chiral and topological orbital magnetism of domain walls and skyrmions,” Commun. Phys. 1, 60 (2018)

    2018

  2. [8]

    Topological– chiral magnetic interactions driven by emergent orbital magnetism,

    Sergii Grytsiuk, J-P Hanke, Markus Hoffmann, Juba Bouaziz, Olena Gomonay, Gustav Bihlmayer, Samir Lou- nis, Yuriy Mokrousov, and Stefan Bl¨ ugel, “Topological– chiral magnetic interactions driven by emergent orbital magnetism,” Nat. Commun. 11, 511 (2020)

    2020

  3. [9]

    Imprinting and driving electronic orbital magnetism using magnons,

    Li-chuan Zhang, Dongwook Go, Jan-Philipp Hanke, Patrick M Buhl, Sergii Grytsiuk, Stefan Bl¨ ugel, Fabian R Lux, and Yuriy Mokrousov, “Imprinting and driving electronic orbital magnetism using magnons,” Commun. Phys. 3, 227 (2020)

    2020

  4. [10]

    Spin chirality, Berry phase, and anomalous Hall effect in a frustrated ferromagnet,

    Y Taguchi, Y Oohara, H Yoshizawa, N Nagaosa, and Y Tokura, “Spin chirality, Berry phase, and anomalous Hall effect in a frustrated ferromagnet,” Science 291, 2573–2576 (2001)

    2001

  5. [11]

    Chirality-driven anomalous Hall effect in weak coupling regime,

    Gen Tatara and Hikaru Kawamura, “Chirality-driven anomalous Hall effect in weak coupling regime,” J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 71, 2613–2616 (2002)

    2002

  6. [12]

    Time-reversal sym- metry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect without mag- netic dipole order,

    Yo Machida, Satoru Nakatsuji, Shigeki Onoda, Takashi Tayama, and Toshiro Sakakibara, “Time-reversal sym- metry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect without mag- netic dipole order,” Nature 463, 210–213 (2010)

    2010

  7. [13]

    Theory of the thermal Hall effect in quantum magnets,

    Hosho Katsura, Naoto Nagaosa, and Patrick A Lee, “Theory of the thermal Hall effect in quantum magnets,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 066403 (2010)

    2010

  8. [14]

    Spin chirality in- duced skew scattering and anomalous Hall effect in chiral magnets,

    Hiroaki Ishizuka and Naoto Nagaosa, “Spin chirality in- duced skew scattering and anomalous Hall effect in chiral magnets,” Sci. Adv. 4, eaap9962 (2018)

    2018

  9. [15]

    Orbital ferromag- netism and anomalous Hall effect in antiferromagnets on the distorted fcc lattice,

    Ryuichi Shindou and Naoto Nagaosa, “Orbital ferromag- netism and anomalous Hall effect in antiferromagnets on the distorted fcc lattice,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 116801 (2001)

    2001

  10. [16]

    Large anomalous Hall effect in a non-collinear antifer- romagnet at room temperature,

    Satoru Nakatsuji, Naoki Kiyohara, and Tomoya Higo, “Large anomalous Hall effect in a non-collinear antifer- romagnet at room temperature,” Nature 527, 212–215 (2015)

    2015

  11. [17]

    Spin chirality and Hall-like transport phenomena of spin excitations,

    Jung Hoon Han and Hyunyong Lee, “Spin chirality and Hall-like transport phenomena of spin excitations,” J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 86, 011007 (2017). 9

    2017

  12. [18]

    Thermal Hall effects due to topological spin fluctuations in YMnO3,

    Ha-Leem Kim, Takuma Saito, Heejun Yang, Hiroaki Ishizuka, Matthew John Coak, Jun Han Lee, Hasung Sim, Yoon Seok Oh, Naoto Nagaosa, and Je-Geun Park, “Thermal Hall effects due to topological spin fluctuations in YMnO3,” Nat. Commun. 15, 243 (2024)

    2024

  13. [19]

    Topological Hall effect in the A phase of MnSi,

    A Neubauer, C Pfleiderer, B Binz, A Rosch, R Ritz, PG Niklowitz, and P B¨ oni, “Topological Hall effect in the A phase of MnSi,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 186602 (2009)

    2009

  14. [20]

    Large topological Hall effect in a short-period helimagnet MnGe,

    N Kanazawa, Y Onose, T Arima, D Okuyama, K Ohoyama, S Wakimoto, K Kakurai, S Ishiwata, and Y Tokura, “Large topological Hall effect in a short-period helimagnet MnGe,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 156603 (2011)

    2011

  15. [21]

    Real-space and reciprocal-space Berry phases in the Hall effect of Mn 1-x Fe x Si,

    C Franz, F Freimuth, A Bauer, R Ritz, C Schnarr, C Duvinage, T Adams, S Bl¨ ugel, A Rosch, Y Mokrousov, et al., “Real-space and reciprocal-space Berry phases in the Hall effect of Mn 1-x Fe x Si,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 186601 (2014)

    2014

  16. [22]

    Magnetic texture-induced thermal Hall ef- fects,

    Kevin A van Hoogdalem, Yaroslav Tserkovnyak, and Daniel Loss, “Magnetic texture-induced thermal Hall ef- fects,” Phys. Rev. B 87, 024402 (2013)

    2013

  17. [23]

    Tunable magnonic thermal Hall effect in skyrmion crystal phases of ferrimagnets,

    Se Kwon Kim, Kouki Nakata, Daniel Loss, and Yaroslav Tserkovnyak, “Tunable magnonic thermal Hall effect in skyrmion crystal phases of ferrimagnets,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 057204 (2019)

    2019

  18. [24]

    Universal scaling law for chi- ral antiferromagnetism,

    Shijie Xu, Bingqian Dai, Yuhao Jiang, Danrong Xiong, Houyi Cheng, Lixuan Tai, Meng Tang, Yadong Sun, Yu He, Baolin Yang,et al., “Universal scaling law for chi- ral antiferromagnetism,” Nat. Commun. 15, 3717 (2024)

    2024

  19. [25]

    Observation of the magnon Hall effect,

    Y Onose, T Ideue, H Katsura, Y Shiomi, N Nagaosa, and Y Tokura, “Observation of the magnon Hall effect,” Science 329, 297–299 (2010)

    2010

  20. [26]

    Theoretical prediction of a rotating magnon wave packet in ferro- magnets,

    Ryo Matsumoto and Shuichi Murakami, “Theoretical prediction of a rotating magnon wave packet in ferro- magnets,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 197202 (2011)

    2011

  21. [27]

    Effect of lattice geometry on magnon Hall effect in ferromagnetic insulators,

    T Ideue, Y Onose, H Katsura, Y Shiomi, S Ishiwata, N Nagaosa, and Y Tokura, “Effect of lattice geometry on magnon Hall effect in ferromagnetic insulators,” Phys. Rev. B 85, 134411 (2012)

    2012

  22. [28]

    Thermal Hall effect of magnons in magnets with dipolar interaction,

    Ryo Matsumoto, Ryuichi Shindou, and Shuichi Mu- rakami, “Thermal Hall effect of magnons in magnets with dipolar interaction,” Phys. Rev. B 89, 054420 (2014)

    2014

  23. [29]

    Magnon Hall effect and topology in kagome lattices: A theoretical investigation,

    Alexander Mook, J¨ urgen Henk, and Ingrid Mertig, “Magnon Hall effect and topology in kagome lattices: A theoretical investigation,” Phys. Rev. B 89, 134409 (2014)

    2014

  24. [30]

    Edge states in topological magnon insulators,

    Alexander Mook, J¨ urgen Henk, and Ingrid Mertig, “Edge states in topological magnon insulators,” Phys. Rev. B 90, 024412 (2014)

    2014

  25. [31]

    Thermal Hall effect of spin excita- tions in a kagome magnet,

    Max Hirschberger, Robin Chisnell, Young S Lee, and Nai Phuan Ong, “Thermal Hall effect of spin excita- tions in a kagome magnet,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 106603 (2015)

    2015

  26. [34]

    Kagome lattice promotes chiral spin fluctuations,

    Kamil K Kolincio, Max Hirschberger, Jan Masell, Taka- hisa Arima, Naoto Nagaosa, and Yoshinori Tokura, “Kagome lattice promotes chiral spin fluctuations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 136701 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    Scalar Spin Chirality Hall Effect,

    Gyungchoon Go, Durga Prasad Goli, Nanse Esaki, Yaroslav Tserkovnyak, and Se Kwon Kim, “Scalar Spin Chirality Hall Effect,” arXiv:2411.03679 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Topological magnon bands in a kagome lattice ferromagnet,

    R Chisnell, JS Helton, DE Freedman, DK Singh, RI Be- wley, DG Nocera, and YS Lee, “Topological magnon bands in a kagome lattice ferromagnet,” Physical review letters 115, 147201 (2015)

    2015

  29. [37]

    Magnon ther- mal Hall effect in kagome antiferromagnets with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions,

    Pontus Laurell and Gregory A Fiete, “Magnon ther- mal Hall effect in kagome antiferromagnets with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions,” Phys. Rev. B 98, 094419 (2018)

    2018

  30. [38]

    Model for a quantum Hall effect without Landau levels: Condensed-matter realization of the

    F Duncan M Haldane, “Model for a quantum Hall effect without Landau levels: Condensed-matter realization of the” parity anomaly”,” Physical review letters 61, 2015 (1988)

    1988

  31. [39]

    Topological magnon insulator spin excitations in the two-dimensional ferromagnet CrBr 3,

    Zhengwei Cai, Song Bao, Zhao-Long Gu, Yi-Peng Gao, Zhen Ma, Yanyan Shangguan, Wenda Si, Zhao-Yang Dong, Wei Wang, Yizhang Wu, et al., “Topological magnon insulator spin excitations in the two-dimensional ferromagnet CrBr 3,” Phys. Rev. B 104, L020402 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    Topological spin excita- tions in honeycomb ferromagnet CrI 3,

    Lebing Chen, Jae-Ho Chung, Bin Gao, Tong Chen, Matthew B Stone, Alexander I Kolesnikov, Qingzhen Huang, and Pengcheng Dai, “Topological spin excita- tions in honeycomb ferromagnet CrI 3,” Phys. Rev. X 8, 041028 (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    Relativistic exchange interactions in Cr X 3 (X= Cl, Br, I) monolayers,

    YO Kvashnin, Anders Bergman, AI Lichtenstein, and MI Katsnelson, “Relativistic exchange interactions in Cr X 3 (X= Cl, Br, I) monolayers,” Phys. Rev. B 102, 115162 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    Magnetic field effect on topological spin excitations in CrI 3,

    Lebing Chen, Jae-Ho Chung, Matthew B Stone, Alexan- der I Kolesnikov, Barry Winn, V Ovidiu Garlea, Dou- glas L Abernathy, Bin Gao, Mathias Augustin, Elton JG Santos, et al., “Magnetic field effect on topological spin excitations in CrI 3,” Phys. Rev. X 11, 031047 (2021)

    2021

  35. [43]

    Topological magnon insulators in two- dimensional van der Waals ferromagnets CrSiTe3 and Cr- GeTe3: Toward intrinsic gap-tunability,

    Fengfeng Zhu, Lichuan Zhang, Xiao Wang, Flaviano Jos´ e Dos Santos, Junda Song, Thomas Mueller, Karin Schmalzl, Wolfgang F Schmidt, Alexandre Ivanov, Ji- tae T Park, et al., “Topological magnon insulators in two- dimensional van der Waals ferromagnets CrSiTe3 and Cr- GeTe3: To...

    2021

  36. [44]

    Investigation of spin chirality by polarized neutrons,

    SV Maleyev, “Investigation of spin chirality by polarized neutrons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4682 (1995)

    1995

  37. [45]

    The first observa- tion of dynamical chirality by means of polarized neutron scattering in the triangular-lattice antiferromagnet,

    SV Maleyev, VP Plakhty, OP Smirnov, J Wosnitza, D Visser, RK Kremer, and J Kulda, “The first observa- tion of dynamical chirality by means of polarized neutron scattering in the triangular-lattice antiferromagnet,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 10, 951 (1998)

    1998

  38. [46]

    Magnetic chirality as probed by neutron scattering,

    Virginie Simonet, Mickael Loire, and Rafik Ballou, “Magnetic chirality as probed by neutron scattering,” Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 213, 5–36 (2012)

    2012

  39. [47]

    Proposal to use neu- tron scattering to access scalar spin chirality fluctuations in kagome lattices,

    Patrick A Lee and Naoto Nagaosa, “Proposal to use neu- tron scattering to access scalar spin chirality fluctuations in kagome lattices,” Phys. Rev. B 87, 064423 (2013)

    2013

  40. [48]

    Proposal for detecting spin-chirality terms in Mott insulators via resonant in- elastic x-ray scattering,

    Wing-Ho Ko and Patrick A Lee, “Proposal for detecting spin-chirality terms in Mott insulators via resonant in- elastic x-ray scattering,” Phys. Rev. B84, 125102 (2011)

    2011

  41. [49]

    Res- onant inelastic x-ray scattering study of vector chiral or- dered kagome antiferromagnet,

    Zijian Xiong, Trinanjan Datta, and Dao-Xin Yao, “Res- onant inelastic x-ray scattering study of vector chiral or- dered kagome antiferromagnet,” npj Quantum Mater. 5, 78 (2020)

    2020

  42. [50]

    Phonon thermal Hall effect in Mott insulators via skew-scattering by the scalar spin chirality,

    Taekoo Oh and Naoto Nagaosa, “Phonon thermal Hall effect in Mott insulators via skew-scattering by the scalar spin chirality,” arXiv:2408.01671 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Nonreciprocal transport in a room-temperature chiral magnet,

    Daisuke Nakamura, Mu-Kun Lee, Kosuke Karube, 10 Masahito Mochizuki, Naoto Nagaosa, Yoshinori Tokura, and Yasujiro Taguchi, “Nonreciprocal transport in a room-temperature chiral magnet,” arXiv:2412.02272 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.