Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 66 references

Strong coupling M{\o}ller-Plesset perturbation theory

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read SC-QED-MP2, a perturbation theory built on cavity-consistent orbitals, claims to capture field-induced electron-photon correlation at mean-field level and avoid unphysical long-range behavior seen in QED-MP2 and LF-MP2.

desk verdict A genuinely new MP2 variant for strongly coupled polaritons with a credible derivation; the long-range benchmark gap is real but does not sink the paper. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.08051 v2 pith:2GDTHX6N submitted 2025-01-14 physics.chem-ph

Yassir El Moutaoukal , Rosario R. Riso , Matteo Castagnola , Enrico Ronca , Henrik Koch This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-ph PACS 31.15.Md31.15.xq42.50.Pq
keywords polaritonicchemistrycavityQEDMøller-PlessetperturbationtheorystrongcouplingHartree-Fockmolecularorbitalselectron-photoncorrelationsize-intensivity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Inside an optical cavity, molecules and quantized fields form polaritons, and the cheapest reliable route to their correlated ground states is Møller-Plesset perturbation theory. This paper argues that previous QED-MP2 schemes fail because their zeroth-order Hamiltonian uses molecular orbitals that are not consistent with the cavity: the QED-HF orbitals are not size-intensive and, for charged systems, not origin-invariant. The authors develop SC-QED-MP2, built on strong-coupling QED Hartree-Fock orbitals that already dress electrons with cavity photons. They show that this method reproduces QED-coupled-cluster reference trends for coupling and frequency dispersions, and it avoids the unphysical long-range intermolecular curves that QED-MP2 and its Lang-Firsov variant produce. The paper thereby states that a fully consistent orbital framework for the zeroth-order Hamiltonian—not just a well-chosen wave function parametrization—is what carries the accuracy.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the strong-coupling QED Hartree-Fock reference: $|\psi_{SC}\rangle = \exp(-\lambda/\sqrt{2\omega}\sum_p \eta_p \tilde{E}_{pp}(b-b^\dagger))|HF,0\rangle$, an orbital-specific coherent-state dressing in the basis that diagonalizes the dipole operator $(d\cdot\epsilon)$. The parameters $\eta_p$ are variationally optimized, and Gaussian factors $Q_{pq}=\exp(-\lambda^2/(4\omega)(\eta_p-\eta_q)^2)$ built into the transformed Hamiltonian carry cavity-induced correlation into the mean-field Fock operator, making it origin-invariant and size-intensive. The second-order energy correction sums double electronic excitations with arbitrary photon number $n$, single excitations with $n\geq 1$, and purely photonic excitations with $n\geq 2$, with denominators $n\omega$ plus orbital energy differences.

What would settle it

Take two hydrogen molecules far apart inside a cavity with the polarization along the displacement direction and compute the SC-QED-MP2 dissociation curve: if the curve diverges rather than reaching a plateau, the claimed size-intensivity of the zeroth-order Hamiltonian fails. Alternatively, compute SC-QED-MP2 energies for a charged molecule after translating the origin: any change would contradict the claimed origin invariance.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that SC-QED-MP2 accurately reproduces field-induced electron-photon correlation effects because those effects are already present at the mean-field level, in the strong-coupling QED Hartree-Fock reference. The reference is built in the dipole basis, the basis that diagonalizes the dipole operator, with an orbital-specific coherent-state transformation; the resulting Fock operator is origin-invariant and size-intensive, unlike the QED-HF Fock operator. On top of this reference, the second-order correction captures single, double, and purely photonic excitations across photon numbers. In benchmark comparisons against QED-CCSD, SC-QED-MP2 matches the reference trends for cavity-coupling and frequency dispersions of ammonia and gives physical dissociation curves for hydrogen, water, and benzene-water complexes, while QED-MP2 and LF-MP2 show unphysical long-range behavior when the cavity polarization has a component along the molecular displacement.

Load-bearing premise

The numerical ranking of SC-QED-MP2 against its competitors assumes that QED-CCSD built on QED-HF is an accurate reference for strongly coupled ground states, even though the paper itself argues that QED-HF orbitals are ill-defined, non-size-intensive, and origin-dependent for charged systems.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • SC-QED-MP2 reproduces the QED-CCSD coupling and frequency dispersions for ammonia across the tested range, and becomes the most accurate perturbative method at large coupling because its reference becomes exact in the infinite-coupling limit.
  • QED-MP2 and LF-MP2 produce unphysical, diverging dissociation curves for two far-apart molecules when the polarization has a component along the displacement direction; SC-QED-MP2 and QED(np-HF)-MP2 remain well behaved, identifying the orbital basis as the source of the failure.
  • QED(np-HF)-MP2 is well behaved but is expected to lose accuracy at very strong coupling, since its zeroth-order Hamiltonian contains no cavity effects on the orbitals; SC-QED-MP2 improves exactly in that regime.
  • Because SC-QED-MP2 is size-intensive and based on a mean-field reference that already includes electron-photon correlation, it offers an affordable MP2-level route to strongly coupled polaritonic ground states, and the same reference should support QED versions of CC2, CC3, and active-space methods.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next test is ultrastrong coupling, beyond lambda around 0.05 a.u.; the paper's infinite-coupling exactness argument predicts SC-QED-MP2 should continue to improve relative to QED-CCSD as lambda grows, while QED(np-HF)-MP2 should degrade, an ordering that is directly measurable.
  • If the size-intensivity result transfers, SC-QED-MP2 should become the default affordable method for cavity-modified intermolecular interactions, including cases such as the benzene-water metastable complex where QED-MP2 incorrectly turns an unbounded interaction into a bound one.
  • The paper's emphasis on the dipole basis suggests that multi-mode cavities cannot be handled by simply diagonalizing each mode; an orbital framework that simultaneously treats multiple non-commuting dipole directions will be needed for realistic cavities.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper presents a second-order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory built on the strong-coupling QED Hartree-Fock reference (SC-QED-MP2). The authors partition the Pauli-Fierz Hamiltonian after an orbital-dependent coherent-state transformation, define a zeroth-order Fock Hamiltonian in the dipole basis, and derive the second-order energy correction as sums over double electronic excitations with arbitrary photon number, single excitations with at least one photon, and purely photonic excitations with at least two photons. They compare SC-QED-MP2 with QED-MP2, QED(np-HF)-MP2, LF-MP2, and QED-CCSD on coupling and frequency dispersions for ammonia, intermolecular dissociation curves for the hydrogen dimer, the water dimer, and benzene-water, and polarization orientation scans for chloroethylene and water. The central claims are that SC-QED-MP2 accurately reproduces QED-CCSD electron-photon correlation while remaining affordable, and that, unlike QED-MP2 and LF-MP2, it does not display unphysical long-range intermolecular behavior because its Fock operator and orbitals are size-intensive.

Significance. The proposed method is a natural and potentially useful extension of SC-QED-HF: it adds perturbative correlation while preserving the variational orbital-specific coherent-state reference. The derivation in the Supporting Information is systematic and does not rely on fitted parameters; the {eta_p} parameters are variationally optimized. The authors provide a transparent scaling argument (Eq. 24) for the QED-MP2 long-range artifact and identify the basis-dependent origin of the LF-MP2 problem (Eq. 57). The data are deposited at a persistent DOI, and the calculations are reproducible in principle. These are real strengths. However, the numerical validation is incomplete exactly in the regime that distinguishes the method: the intermolecular long-range curves are not benchmarked against an independent reliable reference, and the only coupled-cluster benchmark used is built on the QED-HF reference that the paper itself criticizes. The central accuracy claim is therefore plausible but not yet fully established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, Figures 3-6] The paper's headline differentiator is that SC-QED-MP2 avoids the unphysical long-range behavior of QED-MP2 and LF-MP2, but this is never checked against an accurate reference. The dissociation curves contain only the perturbative methods, and the text explicitly notes that a SC version of QED-CC is under development. A plateau relative to QED-MP2 is not enough to show that the plateau is the correct ground-state energy; it could be a wrong but well-behaved limit. I request at least one intermolecular curve with a QED-CCSD (or QED-FCI for a small model) reference, or an equivalent independent benchmark, to support the claim.
  2. [Section 3, first paragraph] The benchmark QED-CCSD is built on QED-HF orbitals, and Section 2 (Eqs. 13-16) argues that the QED-HF Fock operator is non-size-intensive and origin-dependent for charged systems. For neutral single molecules this is a reasonable benchmark, but for the long-range intermolecular regime the reference itself may inherit the same artifact. The statement 'the comparison is justified as we focus on electron-photon correlation effects' is qualitative; a numerical demonstration that QED-CCSD's long-range interaction energy is stable is needed.
  3. [Section 2, Eqs. (41)-(49)] The size-intensivity claim for SC-QED-MP2 is carried over from the SC-QED-HF Fock matrix (Ref. 45), but the second-order energy in Eq. (49) is an infinite sum over photonic excitations, and its size-intensivity is not demonstrated analytically or numerically. An explicit argument, or a numerical check that the truncated energy is additive for separated subsystems, would close this gap and directly support the long-range claim.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 2, Eq. (1)] 'Pauli-Fiertz' should be 'Pauli-Fierz'.
  2. [Section 1, paragraph 3] The sentence 'Specifically, the method are built starting from two possible reference states' contains a subject-verb agreement error; it should be 'the methods are built'.
  3. [Section 2, QED-HF discussion] The sentence 'QED-HF is unable to account for the cavity-induced non size-extensive effects' is confusing because QED-HF was just called size-extensive; the intended term is likely 'non-size-intensive effects'.
  4. [Section 3, Figure 2] The offset procedure for the frequency dispersion curves is described too tersely; the shifts should be specified explicitly in an equation or table so that the comparison can be reproduced.
  5. [Section 3, Figure 5] 'Sytem' is a typo for 'system'.
  6. [Section 2, Eq. (57)] The overline notation for the Löwdin-orthogonalized basis is not defined in the main text; please define it before Eq. (57).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: SC-QED-MP2 is derived from a published variational reference, contains no fitted parameters, and its numerical claims are tested against QED-CCSD without reducing to the inputs.

full rationale

SC-QED-MP2 is obtained by a standard Rayleigh-Schrödinger partition of the SC-transformed Pauli-Fierz Hamiltonian (Eqs. 31-49 and SI Section S2). The zeroth-order Hamiltonian is the SC-QED-HF Fock operator plus the photon energy, and the sum of the zeroth- and first-order energies equals the SC-QED-HF energy by construction; this is the normal structure of Møller-Plesset theory, not a reduction of the paper's predictive claims. The {η_p} parameters are variationally optimized at the SC-QED-HF level and are not fitted to QED-CCSD data; no term in Eq. (49) or in the supporting derivation is set equal to a benchmark. The claimed long-range plateau of SC-QED-MP2 follows from the size-intensivity of the SC-QED-HF Fock operator, which is cited to Ref. 45 and also supported by the paper's own expressions (Eqs. 41-43), and the paper presents independent numerical dissociation curves showing that plateau. Self-citations to Refs. 28, 45, and 46 are present, but they are not load-bearing in a circular sense: SC-QED-HF is a separately published and tested method, and the principal numerical comparisons use QED-CCSD as an external benchmark without fitting any parameter to it. The absence of a QED-CCSD reference in the long-range intermolecular plots (Figs. 3-6) is a validation gap for the assertion that the SC-QED-MP2 plateau is the physically correct long-range energy, but it is not circularity: the divergent behavior of QED-MP2 and LF-MP2 is rationalized by Eq. (24) and Eq. (57), respectively, and by the plotted curves. No load-bearing derivation step reduces to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method introduces no new fitted parameters: the variational {eta_p} coherent-state parameters are optimized for the ground state, not fitted to benchmark data. The {lambda} and {omega} are physical inputs. The main axioms are domain assumptions about the Pauli-Fierz model, the validity of MP2, and the reliability of the QED-CCSD benchmark. No new physical entities are postulated.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The single-mode Pauli-Fierz Hamiltonian in the length gauge and dipole approximation (eq 1) is the correct model for the light-matter system.
    Used throughout; all methods and results are derived from this Hamiltonian. Multi-mode and beyond-dipole effects are ignored.
  • standard math Born-Oppenheimer approximation: fixed nuclear positions with electronic Hamiltonian He (eq 5).
    Standard in quantum chemistry; invoked implicitly in molecular structure optimizations.
  • domain assumption Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory with the MP2 truncation is a valid and convergent approximation for polaritonic systems.
    The method is built on this; the paper notes in the conclusions that Møller-Plesset theory is not guaranteed to converge.
  • domain assumption The SC-QED-HF wave function becomes exact in the infinite coupling limit and provides a size-intensive, origin-invariant reference.
    Relies on Refs 45,46; used to argue SC-QED-MP2 will be accurate at strong coupling.
  • domain assumption QED-CCSD built on QED-HF is an adequate benchmark for electron-photon correlation in these systems.
    All performance comparisons use QED-CCSD; the paper justifies this only qualitatively.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Strong coupling M{\o}ller-Plesset perturbation theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2GDTHX6N

@misc{pith2026250108051,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Strong coupling M\oller-Plesset perturbation theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2GDTHX6N}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.08051}
}
read the original abstract

Perturbative approaches are methods to efficiently tackle many-body problems, offering both intuitive insights and analysis of correlation effects. However, their application to systems where light and matter are strongly coupled is non-trivial. Specifically, the definition of suitable orbitals for the zeroth-order Hamiltonian represents a significant theoretical challenge. While reviewing previously investigated orbital choices, this work presents an alternative polaritonic orbital basis suitable for the strong coupling regime. We develop a quantum electrodynamical (QED) M{\o}ller-Plesset perturbation theory using orbitals obtained from the strong coupling QED Hartree-Fock. We assess the strengths and limitations of the different approaches and emphasize the essential role of using a consistent molecular orbital framework to achieve an accurate description of cavity-induced electron-photon correlation effects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.08051 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Coupling dispersions for an ammonia molecule. The cavity frequency is set to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Frequency dispersions for an ammonia molecule. The cavity light-matter coupling is set to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Dissociation curves for two H2 molecules in an optical cavity with frequency and light-matter coupling set to ω = 27.2 eV and λ = 0.01 a.u. On the left the polarization ϵ is orthogonal to the displacement direction, while on the right it has a component 1/ √ 3. When the polarization has a component along the displacement direction the QED-MP2 method displays an unphysical behavior in the long-range regime. displacem… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Dissociation curves for two water molecules in a hydrogen bonding geometry inside a cavity. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Dissociation curves inside a cavity for a benzene and a water molecule in two different geometries. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison between SC-QED-MP2 and LF-MP2 dissociation curves for two H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Field polarization ϵ orientational effects on chloroethylene (a) and water (b) inside an optical cavity with frequency and the light-matter coupling set to ω = 2.72 eV and λ = 0.01 a.u. For both molecules, two orthogonal rotations of the field polarization are shown. I…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J.; Ciuti, C.; Ebbesen, T

    Garcia-Vidal, F. J.; Ciuti, C.; Ebbesen, T. W. Manipulating matter by strong coupling to vacuum fields. Science 2021, 373, eabd0336

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Strong light-matter coupling in quantum chemistry and quantum photonics

    Flick, J.; Rivera, N.; Narang, P. Strong light-matter coupling in quantum chemistry and quantum photonics. Nanophotonics 2018, 7, 1479--1501

    2018

  3. [3]

    Molecular polaritons for controlling chemistry with quantum optics

    Herrera, F.; Owrutsky, J. Molecular polaritons for controlling chemistry with quantum optics. J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 152, 100902

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    J.; Schwartz, T

    Sandik, G.; Feist, J.; Garc \' a-Vidal, F. J.; Schwartz, T. Cavity-enhanced energy transport in molecular systems. Nat. Mater. 2024, 1--12

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Inherent Promotion of Ionic Conductivity via Collective Vibrational Strong Coupling of Water with the Vacuum Electromagnetic Field

    Fukushima, T.; Yoshimitsu, S.; Murakoshi, K. Inherent Promotion of Ionic Conductivity via Collective Vibrational Strong Coupling of Water with the Vacuum Electromagnetic Field. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 12177--12183

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Cavity-enhanced transport of excitons

    Schachenmayer, J.; Genes, C.; Tignone, E.; Pupillo, G. Cavity-enhanced transport of excitons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 114, 196403

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    A.; Nitzan, A

    Mondal, M.; Semenov, A.; Ochoa, M. A.; Nitzan, A. Strong Coupling in Infrared Plasmonic Cavities. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2022, 13, 9673--9678

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    M.; Narang, P.; Craster, R

    Fitzgerald, J. M.; Narang, P.; Craster, R. V.; Maier, S. A.; Giannini, V. Quantum plasmonics. Proc. IEEE 2016, 104, 2307--2322

    work page 2016

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    u bener, H.; De Giovannini, U.; Sch \

    H \"u bener, H.; De Giovannini, U.; Sch \"a fer, C.; Andberger, J.; Ruggenthaler, M.; Faist, J.; Rubio, A. Engineering quantum materials with chiral optical cavities. Nat. Mater. 2021, 20, 438--442

    2021

  2. [10]

    Scholes, G. D. Polaritons and excitons: Hamiltonian design for enhanced coherence. Proc. R. Soc. A 2020, 476, 20200278

    2020

  3. [11]

    Classical approaches to chiral polaritonics

    Mauro, L.; Fregoni, J.; Feist, J.; Avriller, R. Classical approaches to chiral polaritonics. Phys. Rev. A 2024, 109, 023528

    2024

  4. [12]

    A.; Uji-i, H.; Hirai, K

    Sasaki, I.; Takahashi, K.; Taemaitree, F.; Nakamura, T.; Hutchison, J. A.; Uji-i, H.; Hirai, K. Optical Cavity Enhancement of Visible Light-Driven Photochemical Reaction in the Crystalline State. Chem. Commun. 2025,

    2025

  5. [13]

    F.; Mart \' nez-Mart \' nez, L

    Ribeiro, R. F.; Mart \' nez-Mart \' nez, L. A.; Du, M.; Campos-Gonzalez-Angulo, J.; Yuen-Zhou, J. Polariton chemistry: controlling molecular dynamics with optical cavities. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 6325--6339

    2018

  6. [14]

    Strong coupling with light enhances the photoisomerization quantum yield of azobenzene

    Fregoni, J.; Granucci, G.; Persico, M.; Corni, S. Strong coupling with light enhances the photoisomerization quantum yield of azobenzene. Chem 2020, 6, 250--265

    2020

  7. [15]

    W.; George, J

    Lather, J.; Bhatt, P.; Thomas, A.; Ebbesen, T. W.; George, J. Cavity catalysis by cooperative vibrational strong coupling of reactant and solvent molecules. Angew.Chem.Int.Ed. 2019, 58, 10635--10638

    2019

  8. [16]

    F.; Recabal, F.; Herrera, F.; Simpkins, B

    Ahn, W.; Triana, J. F.; Recabal, F.; Herrera, F.; Simpkins, B. S. Modification of ground-state chemical reactivity via light--matter coherence in infrared cavities. Science 2023, 380, 1165--1168

    2023

  9. [17]

    U.; Moth-Poulsen, K.; Feist, J.; B \"o rjesson, K

    Mony, J.; Climent, C.; Petersen, A. U.; Moth-Poulsen, K.; Feist, J.; B \"o rjesson, K. Photoisomerization efficiency of a solar thermal fuel in the strong coupling regime. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2010737

    2021

  10. [18]

    A.; Huo, P

    Mandal, A.; Taylor, M. A.; Huo, P. Theory for Cavity-Modified Ground-State Reactivities via Electron--Photon Interactions. J. Phys. Chem. A 2023, 127, 6830--6841

    2023

  11. [19]

    W.; Anders, J.; Saalfrank, P

    Fischer, E. W.; Anders, J.; Saalfrank, P. Cavity-altered thermal isomerization rates and dynamical resonant localization in vibro-polaritonic chemistry. J. Chem. Phys. 2022, 156, 154305

    2022

  12. [21]

    J.; Scherman, O

    Chikkaraddy, R.; De Nijs, B.; Benz, F.; Barrow, S. J.; Scherman, O. A.; Rosta, E.; Demetriadou, A.; Fox, P.; Hess, O.; Baumberg, J. J. Single-molecule strong coupling at room temperature in plasmonic nanocavities. Nature 2016, 535, 127--130

    2016

  13. [22]

    Vacuum Rabi splitting in a plasmonic cavity at the single quantum emitter limit

    Santhosh, K.; Bitton, O.; Chuntonov, L.; Haran, G. Vacuum Rabi splitting in a plasmonic cavity at the single quantum emitter limit. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, ncomms11823

    2016

  14. [23]

    Plasmonic Cavities and Individual Quantum Emitters in the Strong Coupling Limit

    Bitton, O.; Haran, G. Plasmonic Cavities and Individual Quantum Emitters in the Strong Coupling Limit. Acc. Chem. Res. 2022, 55, 1659--1668

    2022

  15. [24]

    Baumberg, J. J. Picocavities: A primer. Nano Lett. 2022, 22, 5859--5865

    2022

  16. [25]

    Strong coupling of collective intermolecular vibrations in organic materials at terahertz frequencies

    Damari, R.; Weinberg, O.; Krotkov, D.; Demina, N.; Akulov, K.; Golombek, A.; Schwartz, T.; Fleischer, S. Strong coupling of collective intermolecular vibrations in organic materials at terahertz frequencies. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3248

    2019

  17. [26]

    S.; Ronca, E.; Koch, H.; Sch\" a fer, C

    Castagnola, M.; Haugland, T. S.; Ronca, E.; Koch, H.; Sch\" a fer, C. Collective strong coupling modifies aggregation and solvation. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2024, 15, 1428--1434

    2024

  18. [27]

    Cavity quantum electrodynamics at arbitrary light-matter coupling strengths

    Ashida, Y.; \.I mamo g lu, A.; Demler, E. Cavity quantum electrodynamics at arbitrary light-matter coupling strengths. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021, 126, 153603

    2021

  19. [28]

    S.; Ronca, E.; Kj nstad, E

    Haugland, T. S.; Ronca, E.; Kj nstad, E. F.; Rubio, A.; Koch, H. Coupled cluster theory for molecular polaritons: Changing ground and excited states. Phys.l Rev. X 2020, 10, 041043

    2020

  20. [29]

    A.; Mandal, A.; Zhou, W.; Huo, P

    Taylor, M. A.; Mandal, A.; Zhou, W.; Huo, P. Resolution of gauge ambiguities in molecular cavity quantum electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, 125, 123602

    2020

  21. [30]

    McTague, J.; Foley, J. J. Non-Hermitian cavity quantum electrodynamics--configuration interaction singles approach for polaritonic structure with ab initio molecular Hamiltonians. J. Chem. Phys. 2022, 156

    2022

  22. [31]

    Catalysis by dark states in vibropolaritonic chemistry

    Du, M.; Yuen-Zhou, J. Catalysis by dark states in vibropolaritonic chemistry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022, 128, 096001

    2022

  23. [32]

    Analytical derivative approaches for vibro-polaritonic structures and properties

    Huang, X.; Liang, W. Analytical derivative approaches for vibro-polaritonic structures and properties. I. Formalism and implementation. J. Chem. Phys. 2025, 162

    2025

  24. [33]

    V.; Rubio, A

    Ruggenthaler, M.; Flick, J.; Pellegrini, C.; Appel, H.; Tokatly, I. V.; Rubio, A. Quantum-electrodynamical density-functional theory: Bridging quantum optics and electronic-structure theory. Phys. Rev. A 2014, 90, 012508

    2014

  25. [34]

    Shining light on the microscopic resonant mechanism responsible for cavity-mediated chemical reactivity

    Sch \"a fer, C.; Flick, J.; Ronca, E.; Narang, P.; Rubio, A. Shining light on the microscopic resonant mechanism responsible for cavity-mediated chemical reactivity. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 7817

    2022

  26. [35]

    Ab initio nonrelativistic quantum electrodynamics: Bridging quantum chemistry and quantum optics from weak to strong coupling

    Sch \"a fer, C.; Ruggenthaler, M.; Rubio, A. Ab initio nonrelativistic quantum electrodynamics: Bridging quantum chemistry and quantum optics from weak to strong coupling. Phys. Rev. A 2018, 98, 043801

    2018

  27. [36]

    Ab initio optimized effective potentials for real molecules in optical cavities: Photon contributions to the molecular ground state

    Flick, J.; Sc \"a hfer, C.; Ruggenthaler, M.; Appel, H.; Rubio, A. Ab initio optimized effective potentials for real molecules in optical cavities: Photon contributions to the molecular ground state. ACS photonics 2018, 5, 992--1005

    2018

  28. [37]

    R.; Haugland, T

    Riso, R. R.; Haugland, T. S.; Ronca, E.; Koch, H. On the characteristic features of ionization in QED environments. J. Chem. Phys. 2022, 156, 234103

    2022

  29. [38]

    Cavity-modulated proton transfer reactions

    Pavosevic, F.; Hammes-Schiffer, S.; Rubio, A.; Flick, J. Cavity-modulated proton transfer reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 4995--5002

    2022

  30. [39]

    DePrince, A. E. Cavity-modulated ionization potentials and electron affinities from quantum electrodynamics coupled-cluster theory. J. Chem. Phys. 2021, 154

    2021

  31. [40]

    D.; Vu, N.; DePrince, A

    Liebenthal, M. D.; Vu, N.; DePrince, A. E. Equation-of-motion cavity quantum electrodynamics coupled-cluster theory for electron attachment. J. Chem. Phys. 2022, 156

    2022

  32. [41]

    J.; Rubio, A.; Manby, F

    Mordovina, U.; Bungey, C.; Appel, H.; Knowles, P. J.; Rubio, A.; Manby, F. R. Polaritonic coupled-cluster theory. Phys. Rev. Res. 2020, 2, 023262

    2020

  33. [42]

    Molecular electronic-structure theory; John Wiley & Sons, 2013

    Helgaker, T.; Jorgensen, P.; Olsen, J. Molecular electronic-structure theory; John Wiley & Sons, 2013

    2013

  34. [43]

    S.; Philbin, J

    Haugland, T. S.; Philbin, J. P.; Ghosh, T. K.; Chen, M.; Koch, H.; Narang, P. Understanding the polaritonic ground state in cavity quantum electrodynamics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.14822 2023,

    2023 arXiv

  35. [44]

    Perturbation theoretical approaches to strong light--matter coupling in ground and excited electronic states for the description of molecular polaritons

    Bauer, M.; Dreuw, A. Perturbation theoretical approaches to strong light--matter coupling in ground and excited electronic states for the description of molecular polaritons. J. Chem. Phys. 2023, 158

    2023

  36. [45]

    R.; Haugland, T

    Riso, R. R.; Haugland, T. S.; Ronca, E.; Koch, H. Molecular orbital theory in cavity QED environments. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1368

    2022

  37. [46]

    R.; Castagnola, M.; Koch, H

    El Moutaoukal, Y.; Riso, R. R.; Castagnola, M.; Koch, H. Toward polaritonic molecular orbitals for large molecular systems. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2024, 20, 8911--8920

    2024

  38. [47]

    Cui, Z.-H.; Mandal, A.; Reichman, D. R. Variational lang--firsov approach plus m ller--plesset perturbation theory with applications to ab initio polariton chemistry. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2024, 20, 1143--1156

    2024

  39. [48]

    Photons and atoms: introduction to quantum electrodynamics; John Wiley & Sons, 2024

    Cohen-Tannoudji, C.; Dupont-Roc, J.; Grynberg, G. Photons and atoms: introduction to quantum electrodynamics; John Wiley & Sons, 2024

    2024

  40. [49]

    Polarized Fock states and the dynamical Casimir effect in molecular cavity quantum electrodynamics

    Mandal, A.; Montillo Vega, S.; Huo, P. Polarized Fock states and the dynamical Casimir effect in molecular cavity quantum electrodynamics. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 9215--9223

    2020

  41. [50]

    Light-matter decoupling in the deep strong coupling regime: The breakdown of the Purcell effect

    De Liberato, S. Light-matter decoupling in the deep strong coupling regime: The breakdown of the Purcell effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 112, 016401

    2014

  42. [51]

    Resolution of gauge ambiguities in ultrastrong-coupling cavity quantum electrodynamics

    Di Stefano, O.; Settineri, A.; Macr \` , V.; Garziano, L.; Stassi, R.; Savasta, S.; Nori, F. Resolution of gauge ambiguities in ultrastrong-coupling cavity quantum electrodynamics. Nat. Phys. 2019, 15, 803--808

    2019

  43. [52]

    Ultrastrong coupling between light and matter

    Frisk Kockum, A.; Miranowicz, A.; De Liberato, S.; Savasta, S.; Nori, F. Ultrastrong coupling between light and matter. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2019, 1, 19--40

    2019

  44. [53]

    M.; Ruggenthaler, M.; Rubio, A

    Rokaj, V.; Welakuh, D. M.; Ruggenthaler, M.; Rubio, A. Light--matter interaction in the long-wavelength limit: no ground-state without dipole self-energy. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 2018, 51, 034005

    2018

  45. [54]

    A note on the quantum-mechanical perturbation theory

    L \"o wdin, P.-O. A note on the quantum-mechanical perturbation theory. J. Chem. Phys. 1951, 19, 1396--1401

    1951

  46. [55]

    M ller, C.; Plesset, M. S. Note on an approximation treatment for many-electron systems. Phys. Rev. 1934, 46, 618

    1934

  47. [56]

    S.; Sch \"a fer, C.; Ronca, E.; Rubio, A.; Koch, H

    Haugland, T. S.; Sch \"a fer, C.; Ronca, E.; Rubio, A.; Koch, H. Intermolecular interactions in optical cavities: An ab initio QED study. J. Chem. Phys. 2021, 154, 094113

    2021

  48. [57]

    P.; Thirunamachandran, T

    Craig, D. P.; Thirunamachandran, T. Molecular quantum electrodynamics: an introduction to radiation-molecule interactions; Courier Corporation, 1998

    1998

  49. [58]

    D.; Kj nstad, E

    Folkestad, S. D.; Kj nstad, E. F.; Myhre, R. H.; Andersen, J. H.; Balbi, A.; Coriani, S.; Giovannini, T.; Goletto, L.; Haugland, T. S.; Hutcheson, A., et al. e T 1.0: An open source electronic structure program with emphasis on coupled cluster and multilevel methods. J. Chem. ...

    2020

  50. [59]

    POLAR: Polariton and polaron (electron-boson coupled) systems from a quantum chemical perspective

    Cui, Z.-H. POLAR: Polariton and polaron (electron-boson coupled) systems from a quantum chemical perspective . https://github.com/zhcui/polar_preview, n.d.; Accessed: 2025-01-09

    2025

  51. [60]

    S.; Bogdanov, N

    Sun, Q.; Zhang, X.; Banerjee, S.; Bao, P.; Barbry, M.; Blunt, N. S.; Bogdanov, N. A.; Booth, G. H.; Chen, J.; Cui, Z.-H., et al. Recent developments in the PySCF program package. J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 153

    2020

  52. [61]

    P.; Altarawy, D.; Didier, B.; Gibsom, T

    Pritchard, B. P.; Altarawy, D.; Didier, B.; Gibsom, T. D.; Windus, T. L. A New Basis Set Exchange: An Open, Up-to-date Resource for the Molecular Sciences Community. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2019, 59, 4814--4820

    2019

  53. [62]

    Dunning, T. H. Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. I. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 90, 1007--1023

    1989

  54. [63]

    Software update: The ORCA program system—Version 5.0

    Neese, F. Software update: The ORCA program system—Version 5.0. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci. 2022, 12, e1606

    2022

  55. [64]

    A quantitative view of charge transfer in the hydrogen bond: the water dimer case

    Ronca, E.; Belpassi, L.; Tarantelli, F. A quantitative view of charge transfer in the hydrogen bond: the water dimer case. ChemPhysChem 2014, 15, 2682--2687

    2014

  56. [65]

    Divergence in M ller--Plesset theory: A simple explanation based on a two-state model

    Olsen, J.; J rgensen, P.; Helgaker, T.; Christiansen, O. Divergence in M ller--Plesset theory: A simple explanation based on a two-state model. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 112, 9736--9748

    2000

  57. [66]

    Roden, P.; Foley, J. J. Perturbative analysis of the coherent state transformation in ab initio cavity quantum electrodynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 2024, 161

    2024

  58. [67]

    u bener, Hannes and De Giovannini, Umberto and Sch \

    Forsberg, B.; He, Z.; He, Y.; Cremer, D. Convergence behavior of the M ller--Plesset perturbation series: use of Feenberg scaling for the exclusion of backdoor intruder states. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2000, 76, 306--330 mcitethebibliography Main.bib000066400000000000000000000544...

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.