Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

A Survey on Recent Advances in Self-Organizing Maps

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This survey claims that Self-Organizing Maps have become a family of specialized variants, each adapting Kohonen's original algorithm to a particular data challenge.

desk verdict A modest, honest survey organizing recent SOM variants into six useful categories, but its 'main evolution' framing overreaches its small, commercially-focused reference set. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.08416 v1 pith:QJXFGFJC submitted 2024-12-10 cs.NE cs.AI

Axel Guérin , Pierre Chauvet , Frédéric Saubion This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.NEcs.AI MSC 68T0568T1062H30
keywords Self-OrganizingMapsKohonenunsupervisedlearningclusteringdatavisualizationcategoricalhyperparameteroptimizationsurvey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Self-Organizing Maps (SOMs), Kohonen's unsupervised neural-network method for projecting high-dimensional data onto a low-dimensional grid, have not remained a single fixed algorithm. This survey argues that over the past decade the field has fragmented into many specialized variants, each adjusting some component of the original method to a particular data challenge. It organizes recent work along the map-generation pipeline: data management, topology and metrics, learning techniques, visualization, computational performance, and hyperparameterization. The authors also single out commercial and customer-data applications as an active but relatively underexploited use of SOMs. A reader can use the survey's categorization to locate a variant suited to their data type or application.

What carries the argument

The central object is the SOM algorithm itself: a fixed grid of nodes ("neurons"), each carrying a weight vector in the input space, trained competitively by repeatedly finding the Best Matching Unit (BMU) for a random input and pulling the BMU and its grid neighbors toward that input. The distance $d^*$ between grid cells is determined by the chosen topology (hexagonal, square, triangular, or growing and randomized structures). The survey's carrying device is a classification scheme that locates every recent variant on one of six axes: data management, topology and metrics, learning techniques, visualization, performance, and hyperparameterization. That scheme is what turns a long list of papers into a claim about where the field is heading.

What would settle it

One could test the survey's overview by building a complete bibliography of SOM papers from 2014 to 2024 from a search engine, assigning each to the paper's six categories; if a substantial fraction cannot be classified, or if high-impact SOM work is missing from the categories, the survey's claim to represent the main evolutions of the decade would be weakened.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the survey's own terms, the central discovery is not a new algorithm but a map of the algorithm's evolution: since roughly 2014, SOM research has been driven by specific analytical needs rather than by a single line of refinement. The authors identify six improvement axes and show that for each axis there are working variants, from semi-supervised and missing-data-aware SOMs to non-Euclidean distance structures, fast hardware implementations, and auto-tuned hyperparameters. The conclusion states plainly that "there are many variations of the Self-Organizing Maps (SOM) algorithm, each seeking to improve or adapt Kohonen's original method to specific challenges." If this characterization is right, then the practical status of SOMs is that of a family of methods, and choosing among them depends on the data type, the computational budget, and the visualization goal.

Load-bearing premise

The survey assumes that the works it selected, drawn from the authors' own experience and tilted toward commercial use, are representative of the last decade of SOM research; if that selection is unrepresentative, the overview and its apparent gaps would mislead.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Data-type-specific SOMs are now available, so missing values, categorical features, distributional variables, and outlier-heavy inputs do not force a numerical-only preprocessing step.
  • Topology and distance choices are consequential: no single grid geometry or metric dominates, and matching them to the data can improve clustering and visualization.
  • Computational improvements, including fast BMU search, vectorized training, and FPGA and GPU hardware, make SOMs usable on larger and higher-resolution problems than the original algorithm could handle.
  • Hyperparameterization is recognized as crucial but remains underexplored, so systematic tuning of SOMs is a likely source of further gains.
  • Commercial customer-data applications, such as online recommendation and RFM-based segmentation, are an active area where SOMs offer complementary benefits to more standard clustering methods.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The authors do not draw out a decision procedure, but their taxonomy implies one: check data type first (missing, categorical, distributional), then choose topology and metric, then learning strategy, then visualization output; this ordering could guide practitioners selecting among variants.
  • Because the survey's commercial focus was explicitly based on the authors' own experience, the relative weight given to customer-data applications may understate SOM use in other fields such as medicine or engineering; a bibliometric comparison would test this.
  • One testable extension is to treat the six axes as configuration knobs and benchmark combinations on standard datasets, asking whether specialized variants beat a well-tuned standard SOM on each axis.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper is a survey of Self-Organizing Map variants and improvements published roughly over the last decade. It recalls the basic SOM algorithm, organizes the reviewed works into six directions (data management, topology and metrics, learning techniques, visualization, performances, hyperparameterization), tabulates the references in Table 1, and adds a section on commercial use of SOM in customer data. The paper's central claim is descriptive: many SOM variants exist, each seeking to improve or adapt Kohonen's method to specific challenges.

Significance. As a survey, the contribution is organizational rather than technical: the paper does not contain new algorithms, proofs, or experiments, and it ships no code. Its value depends entirely on whether the selected references are representative of recent SOM research and on whether the taxonomy is informative. The honest statement of the authors' commercial focus and the accessible reminder of the SOM algorithm are strengths, as is the compact Table 1 that maps references to the six improvement directions. If the selection issue is addressed, the survey can serve as a useful entry point for practitioners; as it stands, the representativeness of the selection is not established, which limits the strength of the 'overview of the main evolution' claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 1, Section 3, Table 1] The abstract promises 'an overview of the main evolution' of SOMs over the last decade, but Section 1 states that the authors 'chose to focus on the use of SOMs in a commercial context, based on our own experience in this domain.' No search protocol, inclusion/exclusion criteria, time-window justification, or coverage check is provided, and the DBLP counts in Figure 2 are not used to calibrate the selection. With only 2 to 6 papers per category in Table 1, the reader cannot verify that the categories represent the main evolution of the field rather than the authors' own reading list. This is load-bearing for the survey's usefulness. I ask the authors to add a systematic selection protocol and a coverage analysis, or to reframe the contribution explicitly as an experience-based selection of representative works rather than an overview of the main evolution.
  2. [Section 3.1, [IA18], Section 4] The category 'Large Datasets' includes [IA18], which is described as a force-directed visualization method that 'mimics the capabilities of SOMs' and 'emulates' them. This is not a variant or improvement of the SOM algorithm and should not be presented as one. Section 4 also mixes applications that use SOM as a tool, such as [VPH+20] (RFM customer segmentation) and [ZTL21] (online recommendation), into the same narrative. The authors should separate algorithmic variants of SOM, methods that emulate or replace SOM, and applications that simply use SOM, so that the taxonomy does not conflate these different kinds of contributions.
  3. [Section 3.6] The 'Hyperparameterization' subsection mixes general methodological proposals with application-specific parameter tuning. [SSMB20] is a tweet summarization system that tunes a granular SOM with an evolutionary technique, and [KK20] fine-tunes a SOM for cloud masking in Sentinel-2 imagery. These are instances of parameter tuning in a particular application, not general hyperparameterization methods for SOM. The inclusion criterion for this section should be stated, and the entries should be labelled as either general methods or application-specific tuning.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Section 2] There are several typographical errors ('full ofp measured', 'T raining', 'vehicule') and inconsistent spacing; a careful proofread is needed.
  2. [Algorithm 1] The notation 'E = {Wi, i∈ J1, 4σ2 0K}' and the loop 'for i ← 1 to 4σ2 0' are unclear; the index set and the meaning of the bound 4σ0² should be defined precisely.
  3. [References] References [Zin14a] and [Zin14b] point to the same paper (same title, venue, and year) and should be merged into a single entry; several other entries are arXiv/technical reports (e.g., [AO15], [SW16], [MHRF19]) and should be marked consistently as preprints or technical reports.
  4. [Section 3.6] The introductory paragraph cites the general AutoML and algorithm configuration literature ([PDK24], [Smi08], [Hoo12]) but does not connect it concretely to the SOM-specific works reviewed in the subsection; a linking sentence would improve the flow.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the survey summarizes external work without deriving predictions from fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper is a literature survey, not a derivation or prediction chain. Its central claim, that many SOM variants exist, is supported by the cited external publications themselves rather than by an equation, fitted parameter, or imported uniqueness theorem. The authors explicitly state in Section 1 that they "chose to focus on the use of SOMs in a commercial context, based on our own experience in this domain"; this is a selection and representativeness limitation, not a circular step, because the survey's descriptive claims about individual variants are grounded in the cited papers' own reported results. The only self-citation is [Hoo12] in Section 3.6, where one survey author is a co-editor of the cited volume; the sentence using it, "this core challenge is rooted in the foundational problem of algorithm selection [Smi08], which has been extensively studied for optimizing algorithms [Hoo12]," is background support and is accompanied by external references [Uts97, Smi08, PDK24]. No claimed result reduces to its input by construction, no fitted value is renamed as a prediction, and no ansatz is smuggled in via citation. Potential concerns about coverage, such as the inclusion of an SOM-emulation method [IA18] or application-oriented works in Section 4, are correctness or usefulness issues, not circularity. The survey is self-contained as an exposition and makes no predictive or derivational claims, so it receives a circularity score of 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The survey introduces no new parameters or entities. It relies on the prior literature being accurately represented and on the authors' selection being reasonable representatives.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The cited references exist and are correctly characterized in the survey.
    The survey does not verify the original results; its value depends on the accuracy of its summaries. Any mischaracterization in the cited works would propagate into the survey.
  • domain assumption The DBLP publication counts in Figure 2 reflect the actual research activity on self-organizing maps.
    Figure 2 uses DBLP search counts for 'Self Organizing Map'; the survey assumes this metric is a faithful indicator of field evolution, though DBLP coverage may be incomplete.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Survey on Recent Advances in Self-Organizing Maps." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QJXFGFJC

@misc{pith2026250108416,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Survey on Recent Advances in Self-Organizing Maps},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QJXFGFJC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.08416}
}
read the original abstract

Self-organising maps are a powerful tool for cluster analysis in a wide range of data contexts. From the pioneer work of Kohonen, many variants and improvements have been proposed. This review focuses on the last decade, in order to provide an overview of the main evolution of the seminal SOM algorithm as well as of the methodological developments that have been achieved in order to better fit to various application contexts and users' requirements. We also highlight a specific and important application field that is related to commercial use of SOM, which involves specific data management.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.08416 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Map of hexagons representing 1 variable from a dataset of 417 entries [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Evolution of the number of references per year for the ‘Self Organizing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Organization of the survey according to the different components and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SOMtime the World Ain$'$t Fair: Violating Fairness Using Self-Organizing Maps

    cs.AI 2026-02 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    High-capacity self-organizing maps recover age and income orderings from unsupervised tabular data with Spearman correlations up to 0.85, but the comparison is weakened by feature selection that uses the withheld attributes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Victor Oliveira Antonino and Aluizio F. R. Ara \' u jo. Local adaptive receptive field dimension selective self-organizing map for multi-view clustering. In 2016 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, IJCNN 2016, Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 24-29, 2016 , pages 698--705. IEEE , 2016

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    Determinants of the european sovereign debt crisis: Application of logit, panel markov regime switching model and self organizing maps

    Jean - Pierre Allegret and Raif Cergibozan. Determinants of the european sovereign debt crisis: Application of logit, panel markov regime switching model and self organizing maps. Entropy , 25(7):1032, 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Self Organizing Maps Whose Topologies Can Be Learned With Adaptive Binary Search Trees Using Conditional Rotations

    C \' e sar A. Astudillo and B. John Oommen. Self organizing maps whose topologies can be learned with adaptive binary search trees using conditional rotations. CoRR , abs/1506.02750, 2015

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  4. [4]

    Ahmed, Cherif R

    Reham Fathy M. Ahmed, Cherif R. Salama, and Hani Mahdi. Optimizing self-organizing maps parameters using genetic algorithm: A simple case study. In Aboul Ella Hassanien, Khaled Shaalan, and Mohamed Fahmy Tolba, editors, Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics 2019, AISI 2019, Cairo, Egypt, 26-28 October ...

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Constrained semi-supervised growing self-organizing map

    Amin Allahyar, Hadi Sadoghi Yazdi, and Ahad Harati. Constrained semi-supervised growing self-organizing map. Neurocomputing , 147:456--471, 2015

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Pedro H. M. Braga and Hansenclever de F. Bassani. A semi-supervised self-organizing map for clustering and classification. In 2018 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, IJCNN 2018, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, July 8-13, 2018 , pages 1--8. IEEE , 2018

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    A fast algorithm to find best matching units in self-organizing maps

    Yann Bernard, Nicolas Hueber, and Bernard Girau. A fast algorithm to find best matching units in self-organizing maps. In Igor Farkas, Paolo Masulli, and Stefan Wermter, editors, Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning - ICANN 2020 - 29th International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, Bratislava, Slovakia, September 15-18, 2020, Proceedin...

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Vikas Chaudhary, R. S. Bhatia, and Anil K. Ahlawat. Community SOM (CSOM): an improved self-organizing map learning technique. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. , 17(2):129--132, 2015

    work page 2015

Show all 79 references
  1. [9]

    Vikas Chaudhary, R. S. Bhatia, and Anil K. Ahlawat. A constant learning rate self-organizing map (CLRSOM) learning algorithm. J. Inf. Sci. Eng. , 31(2):387--397, 2015

    2015

  2. [10]

    Conceptual design of a user-centric smart product-service system using self-organizing map

    Jingchen Cong, Chun - Hsien Chen, Xuan Meng, Zhongxia Xiang, and Liang Dong. Conceptual design of a user-centric smart product-service system using self-organizing map. Adv. Eng. Informatics , 55:101857, 2023

    2023

  3. [11]

    Non-euclidean self-organizing maps

    Dorota Celinska - Kopczynska and Eryk Kopczynski. Non-euclidean self-organizing maps. In Luc De Raedt, editor, Proceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23-29 July 2022 , pages 1938--1944. ijcai.org, 2022

    2022

  4. [12]

    Aw-som, an algorithm for high-speed learning in hardware self-organizing maps

    Gian Carlo Cardarilli, Luca Di Nunzio, Rocco Fazzolari, Marco Re, and Sergio Span \` o . Aw-som, an algorithm for high-speed learning in hardware self-organizing maps. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Express Briefs , 67-II(2):380--384, 2020

    2020

  5. [13]

    Pr \' ncipe

    Rakesh Chalasani and Jos \' e C. Pr \' ncipe. Self-organizing maps with information theoretic learning. Neurocomputing , 147:3--14, 2015

    2015

  6. [14]

    SOMprocessor: A high throughput fpga-based architecture for implementing self-organizing maps and its application to video processing

    Miguel Angelo de Abreu de Sousa, Ricardo Pires, and Emilio Del - Moral - Hernandez. SOMprocessor: A high throughput fpga-based architecture for implementing self-organizing maps and its application to video processing. Neural Networks , 125:349--362, 2020

    2020

  7. [15]

    Francisco de A. T. de Carvalho, Antonio Irpino, Rosanna Verde, and Antonio Balzanella. Batch self-organizing maps for distributional data with an automatic weighting of variables and components. J. Classif. , 39(2):343--375, 2022

    2022

  8. [16]

    Rodr \' guez - Pedreira, and Bernardino Arcay Varela

    Carmelo del Coso, Diego Fustes, Carlos Dafonte, Francisco Javier N \' o voa, Jos \' e M. Rodr \' guez - Pedreira, and Bernardino Arcay Varela. Mixing numerical and categorical data in a self-organizing map by means of frequency neurons. Appl. Soft Comput. , 36:246--254, 2015

    2015

  9. [17]

    Two novel hybrid self-organizing map based emotional learning algorithms

    Qun Dai and Lin Guo. Two novel hybrid self-organizing map based emotional learning algorithms. Neural Comput. Appl. , 31(7):2921--2938, 2019

    2019

  10. [18]

    Intrasom: A comprehensive python library for self-organizing maps with hexagonal toroidal maps training and missing data handling

    Rodrigo C \' e sar Teixeira de Gouv \^ e a, Rafael dos Santos Gioria, Gustavo Rodovalho Marques, and Cleyton de Carvalho Carneiro. Intrasom: A comprehensive python library for self-organizing maps with hexagonal toroidal maps training and missing data handling. Softw. Impacts ...

    2023

  11. [19]

    Smoothed self-organizing map for robust clustering

    Pierpaolo D'Urso, Livia De Giovanni, and Riccardo Massari. Smoothed self-organizing map for robust clustering. Inf. Sci. , 512:381--401, 2020

    2020

  12. [20]

    On tensor distances for self organizing maps: Clustering cognitive tasks

    Georgios Drakopoulos, Ioanna Giannoukou, Phivos Mylonas, and Spyros Sioutas. On tensor distances for self organizing maps: Clustering cognitive tasks. In Sven Hartmann, Josef K \" u ng, Gabriele Kotsis, A Min Tjoa, and Ismail Khalil, editors, Database and Expert Systems Applic...

    2020

  13. [21]

    de Vasconcelos, and Emilio Del - Moral - Hernandez

    Leandro Augusto da Silva, Bruno P. de Vasconcelos, and Emilio Del - Moral - Hernandez. A model to estimate the self-organizing maps grid dimension for prototype generation. Intell. Data Anal. , 25(2):321--338, 2021

    2021

  14. [22]

    Application of clustering technique with kohonen self-organizing maps for the epidemiological analysis of leprosy

    Ygor Eug \^ e nio Dutra da Silva, Cl \' a udio Guedes Salgado, Valney Mara Gomes Conde, and Guilherme Augusto Barros Conde. Application of clustering technique with kohonen self-organizing maps for the epidemiological analysis of leprosy. In Kohei Arai, Supriya Kapoor, and Rah...

    2018

  15. [23]

    Different aspects of clustering the self-organizing maps

    Haytham Elghazel and Khalid Benabdeslem. Different aspects of clustering the self-organizing maps. Neural Process. Lett. , 39(1):97--114, 2014

    2014

  16. [24]

    Self-organizing maps in manifolds with complex topologies: An application to the planning of closed path for indoor UAV patrols

    Herv \' e Frezza - Buet. Self-organizing maps in manifolds with complex topologies: An application to the planning of closed path for indoor UAV patrols. In 28th European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Computational Intelligence and Machine Learning, ESANN 2020, Brug...

    2020

  17. [25]

    Classifying model-view-controller software applications using self-organizing maps

    Daniel Guam \' a n, Soledad Delgado, and Jennifer P \' e rez. Classifying model-view-controller software applications using self-organizing maps. IEEE Access , 9:45201--45229, 2021

    2021

  18. [26]

    Jorge M. L. Gorricha and Victor J. A. S. Lobo. On the Use of Three-Dimensional Self-Organizing Maps for Visualizing Clusters in Georeferenced Data , pages 61--75. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011

    2011

  19. [27]

    Gorzalczany and Filip Rudzinski

    Marian B. Gorzalczany and Filip Rudzinski. Generalized self-organizing maps for automatic determination of the number of clusters and their multiprototypes in cluster analysis. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst. , 29(7):2833--2845, 2018

    2018

  20. [28]

    Fault tolerance of self-organizing maps

    Bernard Girau and C \' e sar Torres - Huitzil. Fault tolerance of self-organizing maps. Neural Comput. Appl. , 32(24):17977--17993, 2020

    2020

  21. [29]

    VSOM: efficient, stochastic self-organizing map training

    Lutz Hamel. VSOM: efficient, stochastic self-organizing map training. In Kohei Arai, Supriya Kapoor, and Rahul Bhatia, editors, Intelligent Systems and Applications - Proceedings of the 2018 Intelligent Systems Conference, IntelliSys 2018, London, UK, September 6-7, 2018, Volu...

    2018

  22. [30]

    Gentili, and James A

    Di - Wei Huang, Rodolphe J. Gentili, and James A. Reggia. Self-organizing maps based on limit cycle attractors. Neural Networks , 63:208--222, 2015

    2015

  23. [31]

    A new self-organizing map with continuous learning capability

    Hiroomi Hikawa, Hidetaka Ito, and Yutaka Maeda. A new self-organizing map with continuous learning capability. In IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence, SSCI 2018, Bangalore, India, November 18-21, 2018 , pages 2163--2168. IEEE , 2018

    2018

  24. [32]

    Unsupervised distance learning for extended self-organizing map and visualization of mixed-type data

    Chung - Chian Hsu, Chien - Hao Kung, Jian - Jhong Jheng, and Chuan - Yu Chang. Unsupervised distance learning for extended self-organizing map and visualization of mixed-type data. Intell. Data Anal. , 23(4):799--823, 2019

    2019

  25. [33]

    Improved learning performance of hardware self-organizing map using a novel neighborhood function

    Hiroomi Hikawa and Yutaka Maeda. Improved learning performance of hardware self-organizing map using a novel neighborhood function. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst. , 26(11):2861--2873, 2015

    2015

  26. [34]

    Holger H. Hoos. Automated algorithm configuration and parameter tuning. In Youssef Hamadi, \' E ric Monfroy, and Fr \' e d \' e ric Saubion, editors, Autonomous Search , pages 37--71. Springer, 2012

    2012

  27. [35]

    Cordel II and Arnulfo P

    Macario O. Cordel II and Arnulfo P. Azcarraga. A new method for emulating self-organizing maps for visualization of datasets. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Appl. , 17(3):1850014:1--1850014:15, 2018

    2018

  28. [36]

    Self-organizing map improved for classification of partial discharge using desirability function

    Rub \' e n Jaramillo - Vacio, Alberto Ochoa - Zezzatti, and Fernando Figueroa - Godoy. Self-organizing map improved for classification of partial discharge using desirability function. Int. J. Comb. Optim. Probl. Informatics , 6(3):49--65, 2015

    2015

  29. [37]

    Input information maximization for improving self-organizing maps

    Ryotaro Kamimura. Input information maximization for improving self-organizing maps. Appl. Intell. , 41(2):421--438, 2014

    2014

  30. [38]

    New hardware architecture for self-organizing map used for color vector quantization

    Khaled Ben Khalifa, Ahmed Ghazi Blaiech, Mehdi Abadi, and Mohamed Hedi Bedoui. New hardware architecture for self-organizing map used for color vector quantization. J. Circuits Syst. Comput. , 29(1):2050002:1--2050002:35, 2020

    2020

  31. [39]

    Self-organizing map learning with momentum

    Huang - Cheng Kuo and Shih - Hao Chen. Self-organizing map learning with momentum. Comput. Inf. Sci. , 9(1):136--146, 2016

    2016

  32. [40]

    Fine-tuning self-organizing maps for sentinel-2 imagery: Separating clouds from bright surfaces

    Viktoria Kristollari and Vassilia Karathanassi. Fine-tuning self-organizing maps for sentinel-2 imagery: Separating clouds from bright surfaces. Remote. Sens. , 12(12):1923, 2020

    1923

  33. [41]

    Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps

    Teuvo Kohonen. Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biological Cybernetics , 43(1):59--69, January 1982

    1982

  34. [42]

    Self-Organizing Maps, Second Edition , volume 30 of Springer Series in Information Sciences

    Teuvo Kohonen. Self-Organizing Maps, Second Edition , volume 30 of Springer Series in Information Sciences . Springer, 1997

    1997

  35. [43]

    Improving self-organizing maps with unsupervised feature extraction

    Lyes Khacef, Laurent Rodriguez, and Beno \^ t Miramond. Improving self-organizing maps with unsupervised feature extraction. In Haiqin Yang, Kitsuchart Pasupa, Andrew Chi - Sing Leung, James T. Kwok, Jonathan H. Chan, and Irwin King, editors, Neural Information Processing - 27...

    2020

  36. [44]

    u ller, Minoru Nakayama, Marco Temperini, Tania Di Mascio, Filippo Sciarrone, Veronica Rossano, Ralf D \

    Phillip C. S. R. Kilgore, Marjan Trutschl, Urska Cvek, and Hyung W. Nam. hsom: Visualizing self-organizing maps to accomodate categorical data. In Ebad Banissi, Farzad Khosrow - shahi, Anna Ursyn, Mark W. McK. Bannatyne, Jo \ a o Moura Pires, Nuno Datia, Kawa Nazemi, Boris Kov...

    2020

  37. [45]

    Atlas Khan, Li Zheng Xue, Wei Wu, Yanpeng Qu, Amir Hussain, and Ricardo Z. N. V \^ e ncio. Convergence analysis of a new self organizing map based optimization (SOMO) algorithm. Cogn. Comput. , 7(4):477--486, 2015

    2015

  38. [46]

    Grid topologies for the self-organizing map

    Ezequiel L \' o pez - Rubio and Antonio D \' az Ramos. Grid topologies for the self-organizing map. Neural Networks , 56:35--48, 2014

    2014

  39. [47]

    u ser, Gunnar R \

    Laura Manduchi, Matthias H \" u ser, Gunnar R \" a tsch, and Vincent Fortuin. Variational PSOM: deep probabilistic clustering with self-organizing maps. CoRR , abs/1910.01590, 2019

    1910 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Minsky and S

    M. Minsky and S. Papert. Perceptrons; an Introduction to Computational Geometry . MIT Press, 1969

    1969

  41. [49]

    Incremental self-organizing maps for collaborative clustering

    Denis Maurel, J \' e r \' e mie Sublime, and Sylvain Lefebvre. Incremental self-organizing maps for collaborative clustering. In Derong Liu, Shengli Xie, Yuanqing Li, Dongbin Zhao, and El - Sayed M. El - Alfy, editors, Neural Information Processing - 24th International Confere...

    2017

  42. [50]

    High resolution self-organizing maps

    Van Tuc Nguyen, Markus Hagenbuchner, and Ah Chung Tsoi. High resolution self-organizing maps. In Byeong Ho Kang and Quan Bai, editors, AI 2016: Advances in Artificial Intelligence - 29th Australasian Joint Conference, Hobart, TAS, Australia, December 5-8, 2016, Proceedings , v...

    2016

  43. [51]

    A novel data-driven visualization of n-dimensional feasible region using interpretable self-organizing maps (isom)

    Deepak Nagar, Kiran Pannerselvam, and Palaniappan Ramu. A novel data-driven visualization of n-dimensional feasible region using interpretable self-organizing maps (isom). Neural Networks , 155:398--412, 2022

    2022

  44. [52]

    An improved adaptive self-organizing map

    Dominik Olszewski. An improved adaptive self-organizing map. In Leszek Rutkowski, Marcin Korytkowski, Rafal Scherer, Ryszard Tadeusiewicz, Lotfi A. Zadeh, and Jacek M. Zurada, editors, Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing - 13th International Conference, ICAISC 2014, Zak...

    2014

  45. [53]

    A data-scattering-preserving adaptive self-organizing map

    Dominik Olszewski. A data-scattering-preserving adaptive self-organizing map. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. , 105:104420, 2021

    2021

  46. [54]

    Landmark map: An extension of the self-organizing map for a user-intended nonlinear projection

    Akinari Onishi. Landmark map: An extension of the self-organizing map for a user-intended nonlinear projection. Neurocomputing , 388:228--245, 2020

    2020

  47. [55]

    Costa, and Marcial Guerra de Medeiros

    Leandro Antonio Pasa, Jos \' e Alfredo F. Costa, and Marcial Guerra de Medeiros. Self-organizing maps fusion: An approach to different size maps. In Enrique Onieva, Igor Santos, Eneko Osaba, H \' e ctor Quinti \' a n, and Emilio Corchado, editors, Hybrid Artificial Intelligent...

    2015

  48. [56]

    Costa, and Marcial Guerra de Medeiros

    Leandro Antonio Pasa, Jos \' e Alfredo F. Costa, and Marcial Guerra de Medeiros. An ensemble algorithm for kohonen self-organizing map with different sizes. Log. J. IGPL , 25(6):1020--1033, 2017

    2017

  49. [57]

    A survey on automl methods and systems for clustering

    Yannis Poulakis, Christos Doulkeridis, and Dimosthenis Kyriazis. A survey on automl methods and systems for clustering. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data , 18(5):120:1--120:30, 2024

    2024

  50. [58]

    Rating-aware self-organizing maps

    Ladislav Peska and Jakub Lokoc. Rating-aware self-organizing maps. In Bjorn Thor Jonsson, Cathal Gurrin, Minh - Triet Tran, Duc - Tien Dang - Nguyen, Anita Min - Chun Hu, Huynh Thi Thanh Binh, and Benoit Huet, editors, MultiMedia Modeling - 28th International Conference, MMM 2...

    2022

  51. [59]

    A proposal of a model using kansei evaluation integrated with fuzzy rules and self-organizing map for evaluation of bio-food products

    Hai Van Pham and Khang Dinh Tran. A proposal of a model using kansei evaluation integrated with fuzzy rules and self-organizing map for evaluation of bio-food products. In Steffen H \" o lldobler and Yanchun Liang, editors, Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Sema...

    2015

  52. [60]

    Rougier and Georgios Is

    Nicolas P. Rougier and Georgios Is. Detorakis. Randomized self-organizing map. Neural Comput. , 33(8):2241--2273, 2021

    2021

  53. [61]

    Starkey and Aliyu Usman Ahmad

    Andrew J. Starkey and Aliyu Usman Ahmad. Semi-automated data classification with feature weighted self organizing map. In Yong Liu, Liang Zhao, Guoyong Cai, Guoqing Xiao, Kenli Li, and Lipo Wang, editors, 13th International Conference on Natural Computation, Fuzzy Systems and ...

    2017

  54. [62]

    Automated and weighted self-organizing time maps

    Peter Sarlin. Automated and weighted self-organizing time maps. Knowl. Inf. Syst. , 44(2):493--505, 2015

    2015

  55. [63]

    Visual-interactive analysis with self-organizing maps - advances and research challenges

    Tobias Schreck. Visual-interactive analysis with self-organizing maps - advances and research challenges. In George K Matsopoulos, editor, Self-Organizing Maps , chapter 6. IntechOpen, Rijeka, 2010

    2010

  56. [64]

    Cross-disciplinary perspectives on meta-learning for algorithm selection

    Kate Smith - Miles. Cross-disciplinary perspectives on meta-learning for algorithm selection. ACM Comput. Surv. , 41(1):6:1--6:25, 2008

    2008

  57. [65]

    Automatic parameter selection of granual self-organizing map for microblog summarization

    Naveen Saini, Sriparna Saha, Sahil Mansoori, and Pushpak Bhattacharyya. Automatic parameter selection of granual self-organizing map for microblog summarization. In Haiqin Yang, Kitsuchart Pasupa, Andrew Chi - Sing Leung, James T. Kwok, Jonathan H. Chan, and Irwin King, editor...

    2020

  58. [66]

    AMSOM: adaptive moving self-organizing map for clustering and visualization

    Gerasimos Spanakis and Gerhard Weiss. AMSOM: adaptive moving self-organizing map for clustering and visualization. CoRR , abs/1605.06047, 2016

    2016 arXiv

  59. [67]

    A convolutional deep self-organizing map feature extraction for machine learning

    Mohamed Sakkari and Mourad Zaied. A convolutional deep self-organizing map feature extraction for machine learning. Multim. Tools Appl. , 79(27-28):19451--19470, 2020

    2020

  60. [68]

    Clustering word embeddings with self-organizing maps

    Anca Maria Tache, Mihaela Gaman, and Radu Tudor Ionescu. Clustering word embeddings with self-organizing maps. application on laroseda - A large romanian sentiment data set. In Paola Merlo, J \" o rg Tiedemann, and Reut Tsarfaty, editors, Proceedings of the 16th Conference of ...

    2021

  61. [69]

    Self-organizing map convergence

    Robert Tatoian and Lutz Hamel. Self-organizing map convergence. Int. J. Serv. Sci. Manag. Eng. Technol. , 9(2):61--84, 2018

    2018

  62. [70]

    The chemical basis of morphogenesis

    Alan Turing. The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B , 237:37--72, 1952

    1952

  63. [71]

    Hyperparameter selection for self-organizing maps

    Akio Utsugi. Hyperparameter selection for self-organizing maps. Neural Comput. , 9(3):623--635, 1997

    1997

  64. [72]

    A directed batch growing approach to enhance the topology preservation of self-organizing map

    Mahdi Vasighi and Homa Amini. A directed batch growing approach to enhance the topology preservation of self-organizing map. Appl. Soft Comput. , 55:424--435, 2017

    2017

  65. [73]

    Using self organizing maps and K means clustering based on RFM model for customer segmentation in the online retail business

    Rajan Vohra, Jankisharan Pahareeya, Abir Hussain, Fawaz Ghali, and Alison Lui. Using self organizing maps and K means clustering based on RFM model for customer segmentation in the online retail business. In De - Shuang Huang and Prashan Premaratne, editors, Intelligent Comput...

    2020

  66. [74]

    William H. Wilson. Metrics and the cooperative process of the self-organizing map algorithm. In Fengyu Cong, Andrew Chi - Sing Leung, and Qinglai Wei, editors, Advances in Neural Networks - ISNN 2017 - 14th International Symposium, ISNN 2017, Sapporo, Hakodate, and Muroran, Ho...

    2017

  67. [75]

    William H. Wilson. Multi-scale metrics and self-organizing maps: a computational approach to the structure of sensory maps. CoRR , abs/1805.03337, 2018

    2018 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Cluster and visualize data using 3d self-organizing maps

    Zalhan Mohd Zin. Cluster and visualize data using 3d self-organizing maps. In 2014 11th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient Intelligence (URAI) , pages 163--168, 2014

    2014

  69. [77]

    Cluster and visualize data using 3d self-organizing maps

    Zalhan Mohd Zin. Cluster and visualize data using 3d self-organizing maps. In 11th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient Intelligence, URAI 2014 , pages 163--168. IEEE , 2014

    2014

  70. [78]

    Online recommendation based on incremental-input self-organizing map

    Na Zhou, Jin Tian, and Minqiang Li. Online recommendation based on incremental-input self-organizing map. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. , 50:101096, 2021

    2021

  71. [79]

    Improving self organizing maps method for data clustering and classification

    Zalhan Mohd Zin, Rubiyah Yusof, and Ehsan Mesbahi. Improving self organizing maps method for data clustering and classification. In 10th Asian Control Conference, ASCC 2015 , pages 1--7. IEEE , 2015

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.