REVIEW 5 cited by
Aegis2.0: A Diverse AI Safety Dataset and Risks Taxonomy for Alignment of LLM Guardrails
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
As Large Language Models (LLMs) and generative AI become increasingly widespread, concerns about content safety have grown in parallel. Currently, there is a clear lack of high-quality, human-annotated datasets that address the full spectrum of LLM-related safety risks and are usable for commercial applications. To bridge this gap, we propose a comprehensive and adaptable taxonomy for categorizing safety risks, structured into 12 top-level hazard categories with an extension to 9 fine-grained subcategories. This taxonomy is designed to meet the diverse requirements of downstream users, offering more granular and flexible tools for managing various risk types. Using a hybrid data generation pipeline that combines human annotations with a multi-LLM "jury" system to assess the safety of responses, we obtain Aegis 2.0, a carefully curated collection of 34,248 samples of human-LLM interactions, annotated according to our proposed taxonomy. To validate its effectiveness, we demonstrate that several lightweight models, trained using parameter-efficient techniques on Aegis 2.0, achieve performance competitive with leading safety models fully fine-tuned on much larger, non-commercial datasets. In addition, we introduce a novel training blend that combines safety with topic following data.This approach enhances the adaptability of guard models, enabling them to generalize to new risk categories defined during inference. We plan to open-source Aegis 2.0 data and models to the research community to aid in the safety guardrailing of LLMs.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Safety Is Not Universal: The Selective Safety Trap in LLM Alignment
Safety alignment in LLMs is not uniform but forms a demographic hierarchy, with defense rates varying by up to 42% across groups; a new benchmark and DPO method demonstrate transferable safety.
-
Predict, Don't React: Value-Based Safety Forecasting for LLM Streaming
Forecasting expected future harmfulness from prefixes via Monte Carlo rollouts yields stronger streaming LLM moderation than boundary detection, without exact onset labels.
-
RedDebate: Safer Responses Through Multi-Agent Red Teaming Debates
A multi-agent debate framework with four long-term memory designs reduces unsafe response rates on HarmBench and CoSafe, with the strongest results when debate is combined with learned guardrails.
-
ShieldVLM: Safeguarding the Multimodal Implicit Toxicity via Deliberative Reasoning with LVLMs
ShieldVLM detects multimodal implicit toxicity through deliberate cross-modal reasoning, outperforming existing moderation APIs and models on the new MMIT benchmark.
-
Surfacing Semantic Orthogonality Across Model Safety Benchmarks: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis
Embedding-based clustering of five safety benchmarks reveals six rough harm themes, with datasets showing uneven topic coverage such as GretelAI on privacy and WildGuardMix on self-harm.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.