Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Optimal taxes and subsidies to incentivize modal shift for inner-city freight transport

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.09467 v1 pith:VAXJ5XSL submitted 2025-01-16 math.OC

classification math.OC
keywords scheduledlinefreightlevelroadmodalshifttaxes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With increasing freight demands for inner-city transport, shifting freight from road to scheduled line services such as buses, metros, trams, and barges is a sustainable solution. Public authorities typically impose economic policies, including road taxes and subsidies for scheduled line services, to achieve this modal shift. This study models such a policy using a bi-level approach: at the upper level, authorities set road taxes and scheduled line subsidies, while at the lower level, freight forwarders arrange transportation via road or a combination of road and scheduled lines. We prove that fully subsidizing the scheduled line is an optimal and budget-efficient policy. Due to its computational complexity, we solve the problem heuristically using a bi-section algorithm for the upper level and an Adaptive Large Neighbourhood Search for the lower level. Our results show that optimally setting subsidy and tax can reduce the driving distance by up to 12.5\% and substantially increase modal shift, albeit at a higher operational cost due to increased taxes. Furthermore, increased scheduled line frequency and decreased geographical scatteredness of freight orders increase modal shift. For the partial subsidy policy, we found that an additional budget provides a better trade-off between minimizing distance and transportation costs than solely increasing the subsidy level. In a Berlin, Germany, case study, we find that we can achieve up to 2.9\% reduction in driven distance due to 23.2\% scheduled line usage, which amounts to an increase of multiple orders of magnitude, despite only using a few stations for transshipment.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools