Building Bridges across Papua New Guinea's Digital Divide in Growing the ICT Industry

Benson Mirou; Christoph Treude; Dong Wang; Hideaki Hata; Marc Cheong; Priscilla Kevin; Raula Gaikovina Kula; Sankwi Abuzo; Winifred Kula

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 23 references

Building Bridges across Papua New Guinea's Digital Divide in Growing the ICT Industry

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This perspectives paper argues that open source software, combined with reforms to ICT education and attention to Papua New Guinea's local context, can help close the country's digital divide, and it derives twelve research questions from…

desk verdict A honest, useful workshop report on PNG's ICT/OSS landscape; treat the Q1–Q12 agenda as author-framed, not a representative sample. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.09482 v1 pith:4H6TFHUY submitted 2025-01-16 cs.CY

Marc Cheong , Sankwi Abuzo , Hideaki Hata , Priscilla Kevin , Winifred Kula , Benson Mirou , Christoph Treude , Dong Wang

show 1 more author

Raula Gaikovina Kula

This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.CY

keywords opensourcesoftwaredigitaldividePapuaNewGuineaICTeducationengineeringBRIDGESworkshopGlobalSouthalgorithmicbias

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Papua New Guinea is entering the digital age with internet penetration around 32 percent, yet most communities lack broadband and commercial software is priced out of reach for most citizens. The paper argues that open source software offers a way to level the playing field: free licenses remove the cost barrier, and the ability to adapt software lets locals tailor tools to PNG's context, including its 840-plus language groups. Drawing on the BRIDGES 2023 workshop in Port Moresby, the authors identify four themes—software education, tech companies' lack of inclusivity, the need for local context, and OSS as an avenue—and propose twelve research questions for future work. The stakes are concrete: if these priorities are pursued, PNG could build a software engineering workforce and participate in the global tech economy on more equitable terms.

What carries the argument

The mechanism that carries the argument is the BRIDGES 2023 workshop itself, used as a structured research methodology: 22 invited stakeholders heard four international talks and then produced, through discussion, the four themes (A–D) and twelve research questions that constitute the paper's contribution. The second load-bearing object is open source software itself, defined as freely accessible, modifiable tools (Firefox, Linux, LibreOffice) whose open licenses remove licensing fees and permit local adaptation; the paper treats OSS as the practical vehicle that connects themes A through D, from classroom teaching of version control and pull requests to community translation of software into Tok Pisin.

What would settle it

A randomized pilot in PNG secondary schools that teaches programming by translating an open source tool such as Firefox into Tok Pisin, compared against a standard curriculum, would test the proposed mechanism: if the OSS group shows no greater software engineering skill gains, the central claim is weakened. A companion check is a nationally representative survey asking PNG citizens to rank the Q1–Q12 issues, to test whether the invite-only workshop's priorities reflect the broader population's needs rather than mainly urban or academic concerns.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper argues that open source software can serve as the mechanism for closing Papua New Guinea's digital divide, provided it is paired with updated ICT education and explicit attention to local context. On the paper's own terms, OSS counters the two main failures of the current landscape: the prohibitive cost of commercial software (an annual Microsoft 365 license is close to 100 hours of minimum wage) and the neglect of PNG's needs by Big Tech, which leaves Tok Pisin unrepresented in tools like Google Translate and uses stock imagery of other Pacific communities. The BRIDGES 2023 workshop, run as a research methodology with 22 invited participants from industry, academia, not-for-profits, and government, translated these concerns into four themes and twelve open research questions (Q1–Q12) spanning education accessibility, OSS-based teaching, industry skills, and AI bias in the Global South. The paper further notes that PNG's GitHub developer count grew from 1,576 in Q1 2020 to 7,547 in Q1 2024, a sign that a local base for such a strategy already exists. If the argument is right, the route to a more equitable digital future for PNG runs through OSS adoption, curricular reform, and context-aware technology, rather than through waiting for commercial vendors to extend their pricing and products to a small market.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the 22 invited participants of the BRIDGES 2023 discussion, whose views generate the four themes and twelve research questions, represent the priorities of Papua New Guinea's broader software engineering and ICT community, including its mostly rural population; the paper notes the session was invite-only but gives no sampling frame or participant demographics.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If OSS becomes the backbone of PNG's ICT education, students can learn industry-relevant skills like code review, version control, and pull requests without paying licensing fees.
Localizing OSS into Tok Pisin, one concrete idea from the workshop, would make everyday tools usable for a larger share of the population and provide a low-cost springboard for teaching software engineering.
If the twelve research questions are pursued, PNG's universities and industry can align curricula with recognized frameworks and close the gap between academic training and private-sector needs.
The growth of PNG's OSS contributor base, from 1,576 GitHub developers in Q1 2020 to 7,547 in Q1 2024, suggests there is a local pool of talent for OSS-based programs to draw on.
If Big Tech continues to overlook PNG's market, OSS remains the main viable path for entrepreneurs and government to obtain affordable, adaptable software.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

An extension the paper does not state: the Q1–Q12 agenda could be adapted as a reusable research instrument for other linguistically diverse Global South countries, since the workshop method is portable.
The paper's GitHub growth data imply a testable hypothesis: PNG's OSS contribution growth could be a leading indicator of software engineering employment, which one could check by tracking contributors' job outcomes over one to two years.
A concrete pilot the paper mentions only as an idea—teaching via community translation of Firefox or VLC into Tok Pisin—could be run as a controlled classroom experiment comparing skill gains against a standard syllabus.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague,

Here's my read of arXiv:2501.09482.

The paper is a perspectives report on the BRIDGES 2023 workshop in Port Moresby. It identifies four themes (software education, the digital divide, local context, OSS as an avenue) and proposes twelve research questions for ICT and SE development in PNG. That alone is a contribution: PNG gets almost no dedicated SE research, and the paper gives future researchers a concrete starting list.

What it does well: it is transparent about being a workshop report; the background on PNG's digital divide is solidly cited; the update of GitHub participation numbers is useful; and the questions Q1–Q12 are sensible and cover education, OSS localization, and inclusion. The authors also acknowledge the use of GenAI for copyediting, which is honest.

The soft spot is the one the stress-test note names. Section III says the discussion contributors credited in the paper are the nine co-authors; other participants are acknowledged generally. Despite that, the text repeatedly uses phrases like 'participants agree' and 'participants found.' With no participant demographics, no sampling frame, and no coding protocol, the reader cannot tell what the 22 invitees actually said versus what the authors decided to include. Since the workshop was in Port Moresby and roughly 86% of PNG is rural, the agenda may over-represent urban academic and industry perspectives. I don't think this is a fatal flaw—the paper is openly a perspectives piece—but the authors should either provide more detail on who the participants were or explicitly label the agenda as 'author proposal informed by the workshop' rather than implying it emerged directly from a representative stakeholder group.

The GitHub growth claim (1,576 to 7,547 contributors, Q1 2020 to Q1 2024) is presented without caveats about how GitHub's Innovation Graph counts contributors; it is probably directionally right, but a footnote would help.

Net: the paper is worth a serious referee. It fills a real gap, and the research questions are a useful contribution for ICT4D and OSS researchers. A referee can push for scoping language and perhaps a short table of participant affiliations if available. I would cite it for the PNG context and bring it to a reading group focused on participatory methods or Global South SE.

Recommendation: engage with it; accept for peer review with minor to moderate revision.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. This perspectives paper argues that open source software (OSS), combined with reforms to ICT education and attention to local context, can help close Papua New Guinea's digital divide. It reports on BRIDGES 2023, an invite-only workshop held in Port Moresby with 22 participants, from which the authors distill four themes (A–D) and twelve research questions (Q1–Q12). The paper positions itself explicitly as a perspectives piece, drawing on external literature (low internet penetration, high software costs, Big Tech neglect) and on the workshop discussions to propose a future research agenda for OSS adoption, software engineering capability, and ICT education in PNG.

Significance. If taken as a research agenda, the paper makes a useful and timely contribution: it brings Global South concerns—OSS affordability, local-context sensitivity, AI bias, and the rural-urban divide—to the software engineering community, and it includes co-authors from Papua New Guinea institutions. The concrete list of twelve research questions (Section V) is a practical starting point for future ICT4D work. The paper is also transparent about its format and acknowledges the use of generative AI for copyediting. Its main weakness is evidential: the authority of the proposed agenda rests on an uncharacterized, invite-only discussion, and the claims that themes and questions 'emerged' from BRIDGES 2023 are not backed by a systematic or verifiable methodology. With better scoping of those claims, the paper would be a worthwhile perspectives contribution.

major comments (3)

[Section III and footnote 7] The central claim that themes A–D and research questions Q1–Q12 emerged from BRIDGES 2023 is not supported by a verifiable methodology. The paper reports 22 participants, discussants, and observers (Section III) but provides no sampling frame, no participant demographics, and no description of how contributions were recorded, coded, or aggregated. Footnote 7 states that the 9 co-authors are credited as the contributors to the discussion, while other participants are acknowledged only generally; this makes it impossible to distinguish participant-derived insights from author synthesis. The citation to Ørngreen and Levinsen [16] describes workshop formats in general and does not establish that this invite-only, Port Moresby-based session produced representative data for PNG's predominantly rural population (about 86% rural, as noted in Section IV-B). Please either report a systematic qualitative analysis (e.g., recording, coding, and thematic extraction protocols) or explicitly scope the claims as author synthesis informed by workshop discussion rather than as emergent participant consensus.
[Section IV-B and IV-C] The manuscript repeatedly asserts that 'participants agree' on key positions (e.g., Big Tech overlooks PNG, OSS could ameliorate the divide, stock imagery is insensitive) without providing any evidence of how agreement was recorded or measured. Since the Acknowledgment mentions correcting 'dictation transcripts and free-form meeting notes' with generative AI, it appears that some records exist; the paper should state what data were available, how they were analyzed, and on what basis unanimous or majority consensus is claimed. Without this, the themes read as author-selected highlights rather than a faithful representation of the workshop discussion.
[Section V, Q6] The specific proposal for community translations of OSS packages (e.g., Firefox or VLC) into Tok Pisin is attributed to an invitation-only discussion session at BRIDGES 2023, but no details are given about who made the proposal, how it was received, or whether it was supported by multiple participants. This is a concrete instance of the general attribution problem: a specific and actionable idea is presented as workshop output, but the reader cannot verify its provenance or the breadth of support behind it. If the paper's value is partly in reporting stakeholder-driven ideas, these attributions need to be either documented or softened.

minor comments (3)

[Section II-C] The GitHub Innovation Graph figures (7,547 developers and 6,130 repositories in Q1 2024; 1,576 developers and 1,303 repositories in Q1 2020) are reported with the phrasing '∼ 479% the amount of PNGean developers,' which is ambiguous; it would be clearer to say 'roughly 4.8 times the number of developers' or 'an increase of about 379%.' Additionally, the source is a single commercial platform and may not be representative of all PNG developers; a caveat would be appropriate.
[Section IV-A] The phrase 'contra the importance, applicability of such techniques and new concepts in industry' is grammatically unclear; consider rewording to something like 'despite the acknowledged importance of such skills, participants found that industry is reluctant to share data for academic use.'
[Acknowledgment] The use of Google Gemini for copyediting is disclosed, which is good practice; please also specify whether any substantive content, such as theme extraction or question formulation, was influenced by AI tools beyond readability correction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: this is a perspectives/workshop report whose themes and research questions are not reduced from fitted inputs, self-cited uniqueness, or definitional equations; only minor non-load-bearing self-citation appears.

full rationale

This paper is a perspectives/workshop report rather than an empirical derivation: it contains no equations, no fitted parameters, and no prediction that is forced by construction. The central output is a set of four themes (A-D) and twelve open research questions (Q1-Q12) presented as emerging from BRIDGES 2023 discussions and extant literature; the questions are framed as future research directions, not as predictions derived from the workshop data. The authors do cite their own prior BRIDGES 2019 study (reference [9]) for background characterizations of PNG's emerging software engineering community and internet penetration, and they cite other co-authored works as illustrative case talks ([5], [17], [18], [19]); however, these are contextual supports rather than load-bearing premises. The digital-divide and OSS arguments are independently supported by external sources ([11], [12], [13], [21]) and by GitHub Innovation Graph statistics. The paper's own footnote crediting the nine co-authors as contributors to the recorded discussion is a methodological provenance limitation - it blurs the line between participant input and author synthesis - but it is not a circular reduction of a stated result to its inputs. No step in the paper exhibits the specific reduction pattern required to claim circularity; the only mild concern is repeated self-citation in the background, which is not load-bearing and therefore warrants only a low score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The report contains no mathematical derivation and introduces no fitted parameters or invented entities. Its conclusions rest on two domain assumptions: that GitHub statistics measure Papua New Guinea's software engineering community, and that a 22-person invite-only workshop can support thematic and agenda claims, plus the inherited assumption that open source software can help close the digital divide.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption GitHub Innovation Graph participation is a valid proxy for the size and growth of Papua New Guinea's software engineering community.
Invoked in Section II-C to report 'over 7,547 developers' and '479%' growth as evidence of an emerging local software engineering community.
domain assumption Discussion among 22 invite-only workshop participants can produce reliable forward-oriented knowledge about Papua New Guinea's ICT domain.
Section III cites Oerngreen and Levinsen's 'workshops as research methodology' to authorize the thematic synthesis.
domain assumption Open source software is an effective means to reduce the digital divide in low-income countries.
Taken from prior literature (references 9 and 13) and asserted in the abstract and Section II-C; it is not derived in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Building Bridges across Papua New Guinea's Digital Divide in Growing the ICT Industry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4H6TFHUY

@misc{pith2026250109482,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Building Bridges across Papua New Guinea's Digital Divide in Growing the ICT Industry},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4H6TFHUY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.09482}
}

read the original abstract

Papua New Guinea (PNG) is an emerging tech society with an opportunity to overcome geographic and social boundaries, in order to engage with the global market. However, the current tech landscape, dominated by Big Tech in Silicon Valley and other multinational companies in the Global North, tends to overlook the requirements of emerging economies such as PNG. This is becoming more obvious as issues such as algorithmic bias (in tech product deployments) and the digital divide (as in the case of non-affordable commercial software) are affecting PNG users. The Open Source Software (OSS) movement, based on extant research, is seen as a way to level the playing field in the digitalization and adoption of Information and Communications Technologies (ICTs) in PNG. This perspectives paper documents the outcome of the second International Workshop on BRIdging the Divides with Globally Engineered Software} (BRIDGES2023) in the hopes of proposing ideas for future research into ICT education, uplifting software engineering (SE) capability, and OSS adoption in promoting a more equitable digital future for PNG.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

[16]

Workshops as a research me thodology,

R. Ørngreen and K. Levinsen, “Workshops as a research me thodology,” The Electronic Journal of eLearning , vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 70–81, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://ﬁles.eric.ed.gov/fulltex t/EJ1140102.pdf

work page 2017
[1]

The dichotomy of inclusivene ss and vulnerability as a consequence of banking platform development,

P . Łasak and S. Wyci´ slak, “The dichotomy of inclusivene ss and vulnerability as a consequence of banking platform development,” Research in international business and ﬁnance , vol. 72, no. 102536, p. 102536, Oct. 2024. [Online]. Availab le: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102536

arXiv 2024
[2]

Mind the gap: ge nder, micro-inequities and barriers in software development,

E. Guzm´ an, R. A.-L. Fischer, and J. Kok, “Mind the gap: ge nder, micro-inequities and barriers in software development,” Empirical Software Engineer , vol. 29, no. 1, Jan. 2024. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10664-023-10379-8

doi:10.1007/s10664-023-10379-8 2024
[3]

Trust and involvement of cameroonian software developers in open-source projects,

M. Kadji Ngassam, “Trust and involvement of cameroonian software developers in open-source projects,” Data Science and Management , vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 332–339, Dec. 2024. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsm.2024.04.005

work page doi:10.1016/j.dsm.2024.04.005 2024
[4]

Understanding participati on and corporatization in service of diversity in free/libre and o pen source software development projects,

O. B. Newton and S. M. Fiore, “Understanding participati on and corporatization in service of diversity in free/libre and o pen source software development projects,” The Journal of systems and software , vol. 217, no. 112163, p. 112163, Nov. 2024. [Online]. Availa ble: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.112163

work page arXiv 2024
[5]

Investigating gender and racial biases in dall-e mini imag es,

M. Cheong, E. Abedin, M. Ferreira, R. Reimann, S. Chalson , P . Robinson, J. Byrne, L. Ruppanner, M. Alfano, and C. Klein, “Investigating gender and racial biases in dall-e mini imag es,” ACM J. Responsib. Comput. , mar 2024, just Accepted. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3649883

doi:10.1145/3649883 2024
[6]

As- sessing cross-cultural alignment between chatgpt and huma n societies: An empirical study,

Y . Cao, L. Zhou, S. Lee, L. Cabello, M. Chen, and D. Hershco vich, “As- sessing cross-cultural alignment between chatgpt and huma n societies: An empirical study,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.17466 , 2023

arXiv 2023
[7]

Papua new guinea’s incredible linguist ic diversity,

The Economist, “Papua new guinea’s incredible linguist ic diversity,” The Economist , Jul. 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.economist.com/the-economist-explains/2017/07/20/papua-new-guineas-incre

work page 2017

Show all 23 references

[8]

Biodiversity / papua new guinea,

UN Environment Programme/GRID-Geneva, P . Peduzzi, H. Dao, A. De Bono, P . Lacroix, T. Piller, A. Benvenuti, C. Gampert, and F. Mose, “Biodiversity / papua new guinea,” https://dicf.unepgrid.ch/papua-new-guinea/b iodiversity, accessed: 2024-5-24. [Online]. Available: https://d...

2024
[9]

Challenges for inclusion in softwa re engineering: The case of the emerging papua new guinean soci ety,

R. G. Kula, C. Treude, H. Hata, S. Baltes, I. Steinmacher, M. A. Gerosa, and W. K. Amini, “Challenges for inclusion in softwa re engineering: The case of the emerging papua new guinean soci ety,” IEEE Softw., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 67–76, May 2022. [Online]. Available: http://dx....

2022
[10]

Sagrista and P

M. Sagrista and P . Matbob, Paciﬁc Journalism Review , vol. 22, no. 2, p. 20–34, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.598619911837788

2016 doi
[11]

Individual s using the internet (% of population) - papua new guinea,

International Telecommunication Union, “Individual s using the internet (% of population) - papua new guinea,” https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.NET.USER.ZS?locations=PG, accessed: 2024-4-16. [Online]. Available: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.NET.USER.ZS?locations=PG

2024
[12]

Building the Australia-PNG digital ecosy stem,

Mihai Sora, “Building the Australia-PNG digital ecosy stem,” Lowy Institute, Tech. Rep., Jun. 2023. [Online]. Available : https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/building-australia-png-digital-ecosystem

2023
[13]

The power to change: Adopting fr ee and open source software in papua new guinea,

van Reijswoud Victor, “The power to change: Adopting fr ee and open source software in papua new guinea,” Contemporary PNG Studies , vol. 10, pp. 40–62, Aug. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.962921356019753

2020 doi
[14]

PG — GitHub innovation graph,

Github, Inc, “PG — GitHub innovation graph,” 2024. [Onl ine]. Available: https://innovationgraph.github.com/economies/pg

2024
[15]

Symposia & workshop report guidelines,

Association for the Advancement of Artiﬁcial Intel- ligence, “Symposia & workshop report guidelines,” https://aaai.org/aaai-publications/contribute/symposia-workshop-report-guidelines/, Oct. 2023, accessed: 2024-12-23

2023
[17]

Barriers and self-efﬁcacy: A large-scale study on the impa ct of oss courses on student perceptions,

L. Salerno, S. de Franc ¸a Tonh˜ ao, I. Steinmacher, and C . Treude, “Barriers and self-efﬁcacy: A large-scale study on the impa ct of oss courses on student perceptions,” in Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V . 1. A...

2023
[18]

Towards privacy preserving cross project def ect prediction with federated learning,

H. Y amamoto, D. Wang, G. Rajbahadur, M. Kondo, Y . Kamei, and N. Ubayashi, “Towards privacy preserving cross project def ect prediction with federated learning,” in Proceedings - 2023 IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineer ing, SANER 2023...

2023
[19]

Toward sustainable communities with a community currency – a study in car sharing,

K. Nakasai, Y . Ikutani, D. Takata, H. Hata, and K. Matsum oto, “Toward sustainable communities with a community currency – a study in car sharing,” in 2019 20th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artiﬁcial Intelligence, Networking and Para llel/Distri...

2019
[20]

Nakatumba-Nabende, C

J. Nakatumba-Nabende, C. Suuna, and E. Bainomugisha, AI Ethics in Higher Education: Research Experiences from Prac tical Development and Deployment of AI Systems . Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023, pp. 39–55. [Online]. Avai lable: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031...

2023 doi
[21]

Low-cost information technology in develop ing countries: current opportunities and emerging possibilit ies,

J. James, “Low-cost information technology in develop ing countries: current opportunities and emerging possibilit ies,” Habitat International, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 21–31, 2002. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397501000303

2002
[22]

Papua new guinea,

Central Intelligence Agency, “Papua new guinea,” https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/papua-new-guinea/ , 2024, accessed: 2024-5-14. [Online]. Available: https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/papua-new-guinea/

2024
[23]

Gender shades: Intersecti onal accuracy disparities in commercial gender classiﬁcation,

J. Buolamwini and T. Gebru, “Gender shades: Intersecti onal accuracy disparities in commercial gender classiﬁcation,” in Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transpa rency, ser. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, S. A. Friedl er and C. Wilso...

2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [16]

Workshops as a research me thodology,

R. Ørngreen and K. Levinsen, “Workshops as a research me thodology,” The Electronic Journal of eLearning , vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 70–81, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://ﬁles.eric.ed.gov/fulltex t/EJ1140102.pdf

work page 2017

[2] [1]

The dichotomy of inclusivene ss and vulnerability as a consequence of banking platform development,

P . Łasak and S. Wyci´ slak, “The dichotomy of inclusivene ss and vulnerability as a consequence of banking platform development,” Research in international business and ﬁnance , vol. 72, no. 102536, p. 102536, Oct. 2024. [Online]. Availab le: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102536

arXiv 2024

[3] [2]

Mind the gap: ge nder, micro-inequities and barriers in software development,

E. Guzm´ an, R. A.-L. Fischer, and J. Kok, “Mind the gap: ge nder, micro-inequities and barriers in software development,” Empirical Software Engineer , vol. 29, no. 1, Jan. 2024. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10664-023-10379-8

doi:10.1007/s10664-023-10379-8 2024

[4] [3]

Trust and involvement of cameroonian software developers in open-source projects,

M. Kadji Ngassam, “Trust and involvement of cameroonian software developers in open-source projects,” Data Science and Management , vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 332–339, Dec. 2024. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsm.2024.04.005

work page doi:10.1016/j.dsm.2024.04.005 2024

[5] [4]

Understanding participati on and corporatization in service of diversity in free/libre and o pen source software development projects,

O. B. Newton and S. M. Fiore, “Understanding participati on and corporatization in service of diversity in free/libre and o pen source software development projects,” The Journal of systems and software , vol. 217, no. 112163, p. 112163, Nov. 2024. [Online]. Availa ble: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.112163

work page arXiv 2024

[6] [5]

Investigating gender and racial biases in dall-e mini imag es,

M. Cheong, E. Abedin, M. Ferreira, R. Reimann, S. Chalson , P . Robinson, J. Byrne, L. Ruppanner, M. Alfano, and C. Klein, “Investigating gender and racial biases in dall-e mini imag es,” ACM J. Responsib. Comput. , mar 2024, just Accepted. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3649883

doi:10.1145/3649883 2024

[7] [6]

As- sessing cross-cultural alignment between chatgpt and huma n societies: An empirical study,

Y . Cao, L. Zhou, S. Lee, L. Cabello, M. Chen, and D. Hershco vich, “As- sessing cross-cultural alignment between chatgpt and huma n societies: An empirical study,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.17466 , 2023

arXiv 2023

[8] [7]

Papua new guinea’s incredible linguist ic diversity,

The Economist, “Papua new guinea’s incredible linguist ic diversity,” The Economist , Jul. 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.economist.com/the-economist-explains/2017/07/20/papua-new-guineas-incre

work page 2017