Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 64 references

A symmetry-protected topological optical lattice clock

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A two-tone clock-laser drive in a gravity-tilted optical lattice realizes a tunable Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model, so that a single sideband-coherence measurement reads out the topological winding number and the same platform supports a…

desk verdict A clean theory proposal mapping a tilted OLC clock to a tunable SSH model with a winding-number readout, but the effective-model truncation needs a quantitative check before the sensitivity claims are fully accepted. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.09658 v2 pith:KZ6D5HNS submitted 2025-01-16 quant-ph

Tianrui Xu , Anjun Chu , Kyungtae Kim , James K. Thompson , Jun Ye , Tilman Esslinger , Ana Maria Rey This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph PACS 03.65.Vz03.75.Dg37.10.Jk06.30.Ft
keywords opticallatticeclockSu-Schrieffer-HeegermodelRice-Melesymmetry-protectedtopologicalphaseWannier-StarkladderThoulesspumpingwindingnumberquantumsensing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Optical lattice clocks already combine minute-scale coherence with extreme frequency resolution; this paper argues that the same platform can be made to simulate one of the simplest symmetry-protected topological systems, the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) chain, and that the topology can then be used to improve the clock itself. The idea is to drive a gravity-tilted one-dimensional lattice with two clock-laser tones—a carrier and a red sideband—so that the Wannier-Stark ladder becomes a synthetic superlattice with alternating couplings $\Omega_A$ and $\Omega_B$, plus tunable detunings $\delta$ and $\delta_t$. The paper shows that the sideband coherence $I_x$ contains a term proportional to $(\delta/\Omega_B)$ times the winding number $W_{\rm SSH}$, giving a one-step spectroscopic readout of the topological phase. It further shows that an adiabatic cyclic variation of the couplings—a topological Thouless pump—splits the two clock states by two lattice sites per cycle, forming a lattice matter-wave interferometer whose phase $\phi_T = \delta_t t_f^2/(2\tau)$ grows quadratically in time. If the mapping holds, state-of-the-art clocks could inherit topological robustness against laser amplitude noise while keeping their sensitivity to the clock frequency and to acceleration.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Wannier-Stark ladder of a tilted lattice—the eigenstates of a linear potential plus lattice potential, each shifted in energy by $\hbar\Delta$ per site—combined with Bessel-function dressing of the laser couplings. A clock laser with wavevector $k_c$ along the lattice imprints a phase $\phi = k_c a_L$ per site; after a rotating-gauge transformation, the carrier tone becomes an on-site coupling $\Omega_A/2$ and the red-sideband tone becomes a nearest-neighbor coupling $\Omega_B/2$, with $\Omega_A \simeq \Omega_c I_0 J_0(\tilde J)$ and $\Omega_B \simeq -i \Omega_s I_0 J_{-1}(\tilde J)$, $\tilde J = 4J|\sin(\phi/2)|/\Delta$. These are the two staggered hoppings of the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model, a one-dimensional chain of alternating strong and weak bonds whose topological phase is labeled by a winding number; adding $\delta$ and $\delta_t$ promotes it to the Rice-Mele model. The topological invariant is the winding number $W_{\rm SSH}$ of the effective magnetic field $\vec B(k) = (\Omega_A + \Omega_B \cos k a_L,\ \Omega_B \sin k a_L,\ 0)$ as $k$ sweeps the Brillouin zone. The same machinery produces the measurement: the sideband operator $\hat I_y$ is proportional to the lattice current, its time integral gives the mean displacement $x(T)/a_L = W_{\rm SSH}/2 + \text{oscillating terms}$, and linear response in $\delta$ gives the one-step readout $I_x \simeq \delta W_{\rm SSH}/(2\Omega_B)$.

What would settle it

Numerically evolve the full Wannier-Stark Hamiltonian of Appendix A retaining all terms $J_{\delta-k}(\tilde J)$ and all Wannier overlaps, at the paper's own parameters (lattice depth $5\,E_r$, $\phi = k_c a_L$ incommensurate, $\Omega_c,\Omega_s \ll \Delta$), and compare the resulting $I_x(t)$, $I_y(t)$, and $x(T)$ with the truncated SSH predictions. If the slope $d I_x/d\delta$ at $\delta=0$ deviates from $W_{\rm SSH}/(2\Omega_B)$ by more than the simulated noise, or if the topological transition window in $|\Omega_A - \Omega_B|$ does not sharpen for $L > 45$, the central mapping fails. The corresponding experiment is a two-tone Rabi spectroscopy run in a tilted optical lattice clock: measure $I_x$ at $t = 15\pi/\Omega_B$ versus $\delta$ and verify the quantized slope and its insensitivity to a controlled $0.1\%$ amplitude modulation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper claims that two detuned clock-laser tones in a tilted lattice clock generate an effective Rice-Mele Hamiltonian $$\hat H_{\rm RM}/\hbar = \sum_l \left( \frac{\Omega_A}{2}\hat a_{l e}^\dagger \hat a_{l g} + \frac{\Omega_B}{2}\hat a_{l e}^\dagger \hat a_{l+1 g} + {\rm h.c.}\right) + \frac{\delta}{2}\sum_l (\hat a_{l g}^\dagger \hat a_{l g} - \hat a_{l e}^\dagger \hat a_{l e}) + \delta_t \sum_{l,\$\alpha$} l \hat a_{l\$\alpha$}^\dagger \hat a_{l\$\alpha$},$$ which reduces to the SSH model when $\delta=\delta_t=0$. Because the clock laser wavelength is incommensurate with the lattice, neighboring sites acquire a spin-orbit phase $\phi = k_c a_L$; in the Wannier-Stark basis the carrier and sideband Rabi couplings are dressed by Bessel functions $J_0(\tilde J)$ and $J_{-1}(\tilde J)$ with $\tilde J = 4J|\sin(\phi/2)|/\Delta$, giving independent control of $\Omega_A$ and $\Omega_B$. The central discovery is that the total sideband coherence obeys $I_x \simeq (\delta/\Omega_B)(W_{\rm SSH}/2)$ at small $\delta,\delta_t$, so a single measurement of $I_x$ after a fixed evolution time reads out the winding number and hence the topological phase; the same quantity is the signal for clock spectroscopy. For sensing, a Thouless-pumping cycle of period $\tau$ produces a spatial separation of two lattice sites per cycle and an accumulated interferometric phase $\phi_T = \delta_t t_f^2/(2\tau)$, quadratic in total time. Numerical simulations that include global amplitude noise with $\sigma_a = 0.001$ and local amplitude noise with $\sigma_i \simeq 0.043$ show a statistical-noise variance coefficient $\gamma^2 \simeq 0.00027$ for the SSH clock readout, versus $\gamma^2 \simeq 0.035$ for Rabi spectroscopy, with the pumped interferometer staying below the standard quantum limit across the atom numbers studied.

Load-bearing premise

The entire proposal rests on the assumption that the two clock-laser tones drive only the intended two transitions—the on-site carrier and the nearest-neighbor sideband—so that the tilted lattice is exactly a clean two-band Su-Schrieffer-Heeger/Rice-Mele chain; all other Bessel-weighted couplings, off-resonant terms, AC Stark shifts beyond the leading correction, and beyond-nearest-neighbor Wannier overlaps are neglected.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The clock frequency can be read from the slope of $I_x$ versus $\delta$ at $\delta=0$, where the slope is set by the quantized winding number rather than by the precise Rabi frequencies, suppressing the dominant amplitude-noise systematic of conventional Rabi lineshape fitting.
  • A topological Thouless-pumping stroke separates the two internal states by $2a_L$ per cycle and accumulates phase $\phi_T = \delta_t t_f^2/(2\tau)$, giving the quadratic-in-time phase growth of free-fall interferometry while keeping atoms inside a lattice with minute-scale coherence.
  • Under the simulated noise levels ($0.1\%$ global and roughly $4\%$ local amplitude fluctuations), the SSH clock readout has a statistical-noise variance coefficient roughly two orders of magnitude smaller than Rabi spectroscopy, and the pumped interferometer remains below the standard quantum limit for the atom numbers studied.
  • Finite chains of length $L \gtrsim 45$ already show a sharp topological transition in $I_x\Omega_B/\delta$, and the readout stays close to its quantized value under shot-to-shot amplitude noise up to $\sigma_a \approx 0.5$, so the protocol works in realistic finite samples.
  • Because the system is non-interacting, these protocols reduce classical technical noise rather than quantum projection noise; they can therefore be layered on top of future squeezed or entangled clock states.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension the authors only gesture at is to point the same readout at the tilt itself: since $\delta_t$ enters the pumped phase and $\delta$ enters the winding slope, a differential $I_x$ measurement between two clock samples at different gravitational potentials could become a redshift measurement with the same amplitude-noise immunity.
  • The shallow-lattice regime ($5\,E_r$, where $\tilde J$ is order one) is precisely where the truncated Bessel expansion is most questionable; a direct simulation of the full Wannier-Stark Hamiltonian would quantify the longer-range hoppings that the effective SSH model omits and would map out the usable parameter window.
  • Because the topological protection relies on chiral symmetry, global laser phase noise still hurts; a concrete next step is to design two-tone drives that realize models with different symmetries, or to use the topological slope as an in-situ probe of the local oscillator's phase-noise spectrum.
  • The pumped interferometer needs no dark time, so optimizing the pulse shape or applying shortcuts to adiabaticity—mentioned but not analyzed in the paper—should recover the ideal quadratic phase while keeping the noise suppression.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Formalized claims in Lean

  1. Claim #1: On its own terms, the paper claims that two detuned clock-laser tones in a tilted lattice clock generate an effective Rice-Mele Hamiltonian $$\hat H_{\rm RM}/\hbar = \sum_l \left( \frac{\Omega_A}{2}\hat a_{l e}^\dagger \hat a_{l g} + \frac{\Omega_B}{2}\hat a_{l e}^\dagger \hat a_{l+1 g} + {\rm h.c.}\right) + \frac{\delta}{2}\sum_l (\hat a_{l g}^\dagger \hat a_{l g} - \hat a_{l e}^\dagger \hat a_{l

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a theoretical scheme to realize a tunable Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) / Rice-Mele model in a gravity-tilted one-dimensional optical lattice clock, using two clock-laser tones that drive carrier and sideband transitions between Wannier-Stark states. The central construction is an effective Hamiltonian, Eqs. (5)-(6), with tunable couplings Omega_A, Omega_B and detunings delta, delta_t. The authors show that the sideband coherence I_x responds linearly to the carrier detuning with a slope proportional to the winding number, Eq. (11), which yields a one-step spectroscopic probe of the topological phase transition. They then propose an SSH-based clock spectroscopy protocol that is less sensitive to global and local laser amplitude noise than conventional Rabi spectroscopy, and a Thouless-pumping matter-wave interferometer whose phase scales quadratically with time, Eq. (17), with strongly reduced statistical noise. The paper includes analytical derivations in the appendices and numerical simulations for finite chains and noisy parameters.

Significance. If the effective-model mapping is quantitatively reliable, the paper offers a genuinely new bridge between symmetry-protected topological phases and state-of-the-art quantum metrology: it provides a measurable bulk topological invariant in a clock platform and a noise-robust spectroscopic readout. The appendices contain self-contained derivations of the mean-displacement relation and the linear-response expression for I_x, with no fitted constants used in the central relations. The finite-size and noise simulations are a useful step toward experimental assessment. I agree with the conditional assessment of the reader: the promise is real, but the central claim rests on a truncation of the microscopic Hamiltonian whose quantitative accuracy is not yet demonstrated. The practical sensitivity advantage is also restricted to atom numbers far beyond current clocks, so the headline should be qualified.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix A and Section II] The mapping from the two-tone driven tilted lattice to Eqs. (5)-(6) is obtained by truncating the Wannier-Stark expansion in Eq. (A6) to the carrier and nearest-neighbor sideband terms, keeping only J_0 and J_{-1} Bessel functions and assuming that Wannier overlap integrals I_delta with delta != 0 are negligible. This truncation is load-bearing for every subsequent claim, but its accuracy is never quantified. The parameters used in the main text, including a 5 E_r lattice with J comparable to Delta, make the Bessel argument Jtilde = 4J|sin(phi/2)|/Delta of order unity; at Jtilde ~ 1, J_2 ~ 0.115 and J_3 ~ 0.02 are not tiny compared with J_0 ~ 0.77 and J_1 ~ 0.44. The same shallow-lattice regime also makes the Wannier functions delocalized, which is in tension with the 'deep lattice' assumption used to justify setting I_delta=0 for delta != 0. Please provide a quantitative fidelity check of the effective SSH model, for example a direct numerical comparison of the full Hamiltonian in Eq. (A4) with Eq. (6) for the parameters of Figs. 3-5, or an explicit bound on the error induced by the neglected terms in the observables I_x and the pumped displacement. Without such a check, the claimed topological protection of the clock and interferometer protocols is not established.
  2. [Eq. (11), Appendix D, and Appendix F] There is a factor-of-2 inconsistency in the central winding-number relation. Equation (11) states I_x ~ (delta/Omega_B)(W_SSH/2), and Section IV says that after a time t_B^pi = 5 pi/Omega_B the value of I_x saturates around W/2. In contrast, Appendix F states 'I_x Omega_B/delta = W_SSH' and Fig. F.1 plots I_x Omega_B/delta as going from 0 to 1 across the topological transition. If W_SSH = 1 in the nontrivial phase, these two relations differ by a factor of 2. This is not a purely notational issue: it changes the calibration of the one-step winding-number measurement and the operating point of the SSH clock. Please reconcile the normalization and verify that all numerical results, including Figs. 3(d), 4, and F.1, use the same convention.
  3. [Section IV and Appendix G] The practical regime of the claimed clock-sensitivity improvement is not stated consistently. Figure 4(c) reports a reduction of the statistical-noise variance sigma_s^2 for the SSH protocol at all N, but the full sensitivity comparison in Appendix G shows that, including the quantum projection noise N/4, the SSH protocol beats Rabi spectroscopy only for N > 10^8 atoms under the stated global amplitude noise, and for N > 1.5 x 10^7 under the most favorable assumptions considered there. These thresholds are far above current clock sizes, and the text earlier acknowledges that the advantage 'could be beneficial to future generation OLCs.' The abstract and introduction nevertheless state without qualification that the protocols improve the sensitivity of clocks and interferometers. Please state the N-threshold explicitly in the main text and qualify the headline claim accordingly, or provide additional local-noise or repeated-measurement arguments that bring the advantage into a currently relevant regime.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section V] There is a typo in the sentence 'scales quadratically with tf, which is is also the case for free-falling atoms'; the duplicated 'is' should be removed.
  2. [Figure 3 caption] The caption of Fig. 3 does not define the axis labels of the main panel and inset of (d); in particular, it should state whether the plotted quantity is I_x or I_x Omega_B/delta. This is important for interpreting the claimed W/2 slope.
  3. [Appendix B] The two inequalities below Eq. (B5), such as Omega_s I_0 J_{-1}/2 << (Omega_s I_0 J_0)^2/(4 Delta), compare quantities of different orders in the Rabi frequency and are not sufficient conditions by themselves for neglecting AC Stark shifts over a long interrogation time. The criterion should be written in terms of the accumulated phase, (AC Stark shift) x t << 1, or equivalent.
  4. [Introduction] The phrase 'paves ways to study topological phases' is ungrammatical; 'paves the way' would be clearer.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the effective SSH/Rice-Mele mapping and the Ix winding-number relation are derived from the stated microscopic Hamiltonian via self-contained band-theory and linear-response calculations, not from fitted parameters or self-citation chains.

full rationale

I walked the paper's claimed derivation chain. The starting point is the microscopic two-tone driven tilted-lattice Hamiltonian (Eqs. 1-3 and Appendix A), which is a standard Wannier-Stark description. The reduction to the effective SSH/Rice-Mele model (Eqs. 5-6) is obtained by a Wannier-Stark Bessel expansion (Eq. A5-A7), a rotating-gauge transformation, and a rotating-wave approximation with |Omega_0|, |Omega_1| << Delta; no fitted constant enters the mapping. The subsequent central result, x(T)/a_L = W_SSH/2 + oscillating terms (Eq. 10), is derived analytically in Appendix C directly from the SSH band structure and the Berry connection; the derivation is self-contained and does not assume W_SSH. The one-step readout formula I_x ~ (delta/Omega_B)(W_SSH/2) (Eq. 11) is derived by linear response in Appendix D from H_SSH and the perturbation delta sum S_z; again, the winding number is computed, not fitted. The robustness claims against amplitude noise are quantified by explicit numerical simulations (Figs. 4 and 7) and are benchmarked against external results (refs 21, 45, 47-49) rather than being assumed by construction. Self-citations in the manuscript (e.g., refs 8, 30, 33, 38) concern standard ingredients such as Wannier-Stark states, spin-orbit coupling in optical lattice clocks, and prior interferometric methods; none of these is used as the sole justification for the paper's central predictive claims. The main weakness is the unquantified truncation of the Wannier-Stark Bessel expansion to the delta=0, k=0, -1 terms and the tension between shallow-lattice parameters and the deep-lattice truncation assumption; this is a correctness/robustness concern, not circularity. No step in the derivation is equivalent to its own inputs by construction, and no prediction is obtained by renaming a fitted quantity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard band theory and linear response, plus a domain assumption about the validity of truncating the microscopic driven-lattice Hamiltonian to the two-tone SSH model. The only numbers fitted post hoc are the noise-scaling coefficients gamma^2 from the authors' simulations; these, not a new law or entity, carry the quantitative sensitivity comparison. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • gamma^2_SSH (noise scaling coefficient) = 0.00027
    Fit of sigma_s^2 vs N to y = gamma^2 sigma_a^2 N^2 in Fig 4(c); used in Appendix G to derive the N > 10^8 threshold for SSH to beat Rabi.
  • gamma^2_MPP (noise scaling coefficient for many-pulse protocols) = 0.25 and 0.09
    Fits in Fig 7 right panel, dashed and dashed-dotted lines, for the simulated many-pulse interferometer protocols P0/P1/P2.
  • gamma^2_TPP (noise scaling coefficient for Thouless-pumping protocol) = 10^-7
    Fit in Fig 7 right panel, dotted line; basis for the claim that TPP has lower statistical noise than MPPs.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Standard SSH/Rice-Mele single-particle band theory: the winding number W_SSH equals -1/pi * integral A(k) dk and the mean displacement is W/2 at long times.
    Used throughout Section III and Appendices C and D.
  • domain assumption The rotating-wave and Wannier-Stark truncation: with |Omega_0|,|Omega_1| << Delta, all fast-rotating terms and Bessel terms J_{delta-k} with (delta,k) != (0,0) can be dropped.
    Section II after Eq (5); Appendix A sets delta=0,k=0. This is the weakest load-bearing assumption.
  • domain assumption Atoms are non-interacting and dilute, prepared in Wannier-Stark states |l,g>; Fermi statistics suppresses interactions.
    Section II and the Introduction state non-interacting conditions.
  • domain assumption The clock-laser tones only drive the designated carrier and first red sideband; AC Stark shifts are either small or included as known detunings.
    Section II and Appendix B; AC Stark shifts are included in the noise analysis.
  • domain assumption Amplitude noise is static (shot-to-shot), zero-mean Gaussian with sigma_a = 0.001 global and sigma_i = 0.043 local; phase noise is omitted because it breaks chiral symmetry.
    Section IV, Eq (12); values from cited experiments.
  • standard math Linear response theory is valid for delta, delta_t << Omega_A, Omega_B.
    Used in Appendix D to derive Eq (11).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A symmetry-protected topological optical lattice clock." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KZ6D5HNS

@misc{pith2026250109658,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A symmetry-protected topological optical lattice clock},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KZ6D5HNS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.09658}
}
read the original abstract

We theoretically propose a tunable implementation of symmetry-protected topological phases in a synthetic superlattice, taking advantage of the long coherence time and exquisite spectral resolutions offered by gravity-tilted optical lattice clocks. We describe a protocol similar to Rabi spectroscopy that can be used to probe the distinct topological properties of our system. We then demonstrate how the sensitivity of clocks and interferometers can be improved by the protection to unwanted experimental imperfections offered by the underlying topological robustness. The proposed implementation opens a path to exploit the unique opportunities offered by symmetry-protected topological phases in state-of-the-art quantum sensors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.09658 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. A symmetry-protected topological OLC. (a): Simulating the SSH/RM models in a tilted 1D OLC: by using two laser [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Schematic illustration of the winding number of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Probing topological phases in the SSH model. (a)(c): Protocols in the rotating-gauge frame. (b)(d): numerical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a): The signal of the SSH spectroscopy, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. MWIs in OLCs. (a) The “many-pulse protocol” (MPP). (b) The “Thouless pumping protocol” (TPP). Upper panels: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Comparisons between the MPPs and TPPs with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Systematic evaluation of an atomic clock at 2 14 × 10−18 total uncertainty,

    T. L. Nicholson, S. L. Campbell, R. B. Hutson, G. E. Marti, B. J. Bloom, R. L. McNally, W. Zhang, M. D. Barrett, M. S. Safronova, G. F. Strouse, W. L. Tew, and J. Ye, “Systematic evaluation of an atomic clock at 2 14 × 10−18 total uncertainty,” Nature Communications 6, 6896 (2015)

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    Open symbols on the left panel corresponds to the time and Hamiltonian parameters shown on the right panel

    Right panel: time-dependence of ( δ, ΩA − ΩB) of one Thouless pumping cycle, with time indicated by the colormap. Open symbols on the left panel corresponds to the time and Hamiltonian parameters shown on the right panel. Note that the first symbol (open circle) and the last symbol (open square) are on top of each other, indicating the time-periodicity of...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Optical atomic clocks,

    Andrew D. Ludlow, Martin M. Boyd, Jun Ye, E. Peik, and P. O. Schmidt, “Optical atomic clocks,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 637–701 (2015)

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    A Fermi-degenerate three-dimensional optical lattice clock,

    S. L. Campbell, R. B. Hutson, G. E. Marti, A. Goban, N. Darkwah Oppong, R. L. McNally, L. Sonderhouse, J. M. Robinson, W. Zhang, B. J. Bloom, and J. Ye, “A Fermi-degenerate three-dimensional optical lattice clock,” Science 358, 90–94 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Atomic clock performance enabling geodesy below the centimetre level,

    W. F. McGrew, X. Zhang, R. J. Fasano, S. A. Sch¨ affer, K. Beloy, D. Nicolodi, R. C. Brown, N. Hinkley, G. Mi- lani, M. Schioppo, T. H. Yoon, and A. D. Ludlow, “Atomic clock performance enabling geodesy below the centimetre level,” Nature 564, 87–90 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Demonstration of 4.8 × 10−17 stability at 1 s for two in- dependent optical clocks,

    E. Oelker, R. B. Hutson, C. J. Kennedy, L. Sonder- house, T. Bothwell, A. Goban, D. Kedar, C. Sanner, J. M. Robinson, G. E. Marti, D. G. Matei, T. Legero, M. Giunta, R. Holzwarth, F. Riehle, U. Sterr, and J. Ye, “Demonstration of 4.8 × 10−17 stability at 1 s for two in- dependent optical clocks,” Nature Photonics 13, 714–719 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Resolving the gravitational redshift across a millimetre-scale atomic sample,

    Tobias Bothwell, Colin J. Kennedy, Alexander Aeppli, Dhruv Kedar, John M. Robinson, Eric Oelker, Alexander Staron, and Jun Ye, “Resolving the gravitational redshift across a millimetre-scale atomic sample,” Nature 602, 420–424 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Differen- tial clock comparisons with a multiplexed optical lattice clock,

    Xin Zheng, Jonathan Dolde, Varun Lochab, Brett N. Merriman, Haoran Li, and Shimon Kolkowitz, “Differen- tial clock comparisons with a multiplexed optical lattice clock,” Nature 602, 425–430 (2022)

    work page 2022

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    Hamiltonian engineering of spin-orbit–coupled fermions in a Wannier-Stark optical lattice clock,

    Alexander Aeppli, Anjun Chu, Tobias Bothwell, Colin J. Kennedy, Dhruv Kedar, Peiru He, Ana Maria Rey, and Jun Ye, “Hamiltonian engineering of spin-orbit–coupled fermions in a Wannier-Stark optical lattice clock,” Sci- ence Advances 8, eadc9242 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    Frequency ratio measurements at 18-digit accuracy using an optical clock network,

    Kyle Beloy, Martha I. Bodine, Tobias Bothwell, Samuel M. Brewer, Sarah L. Bromley, Jwo-Sy Chen, Jean-Daniel Deschˆ enes, Scott A. Diddams, Robert J. Fasano, Tara M. Fortier, Youssef S. Hassan, David B. Hume, Dhruv Kedar, Colin J. Kennedy, Isaac Khader, Amanda Koepke, David R. ...

    2021

  3. [11]

    Clock with 8 × 10−19 systematic uncertainty,

    Alexander Aeppli, Kyungtae Kim, William Warfield, Marianna S. Safronova, and Jun Ye, “Clock with 8 × 10−19 systematic uncertainty,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 023401 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    Topo- logical bands for ultracold atoms,

    N. R. Cooper, J. Dalibard, and I. B. Spielman, “Topo- logical bands for ultracold atoms,” Reviews of Modern Physics 91, 015005 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    Thouless pumping and topology,

    Roberta Citro and Monika Aidelsburger, “Thouless pumping and topology,” Nature Reviews Physics 5, 87– 101 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Solitons in Polyacetylene,

    W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, “Solitons in Polyacetylene,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1698–1701 (1979)

    1979

  7. [15]

    Soliton excitations in polyacetylene,

    W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, “Soliton excitations in polyacetylene,” Phys. Rev. B 22, 2099– 2111 (1980)

    1980

  8. [16]

    Elementary excitations of a linearly conjugated diatomic polymer,

    M. J. Rice and E. J. Mele, “Elementary excitations of a linearly conjugated diatomic polymer,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1455–1459 (1982)

    1982

  9. [17]

    Direct measurement of the Zak phase in topological Bloch bands,

    Marcos Atala, Monika Aidelsburger, Julio T. Barreiro, Dmitry Abanin, Takuya Kitagawa, Eugene Demler, and Immanuel Bloch, “Direct measurement of the Zak phase in topological Bloch bands,” Nature Physics 9, 795–800 (2013)

    2013

  10. [18]

    A Thouless quantum pump with ultracold bosonic atoms in an optical superlattice,

    M. Lohse, C. Schweizer, O. Zilberberg, M. Aidelsburger, and I. Bloch, “A Thouless quantum pump with ultracold bosonic atoms in an optical superlattice,” Nature Physics 12, 350–354 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    Topological Thouless pump- ing of ultracold fermions,

    Shuta Nakajima, Takafumi Tomita, Shintaro Taie, Tomo- hiro Ichinose, Hideki Ozawa, Lei Wang, Matthias Troyer, and Yoshiro Takahashi, “Topological Thouless pump- ing of ultracold fermions,” Nature Physics 12, 296–300 (2016)

    2016

  12. [20]

    Quantization and its breakdown in a hubbard–thouless pump,

    Anne-Sophie Walter, Zijie Zhu, Marius G¨ achter, Joaqu ´ ın Minguzzi, Stephan Roschinski, Kilian Sandholzer, Kon- rad Viebahn, and Tilman Esslinger, “Quantization and its breakdown in a hubbard–thouless pump,” Nature Physics 19, 1471–1475 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    Observation of the topological soliton state in the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model,

    Eric J. Meier, Fangzhao Alex An, and Bryce Gad- way, “Observation of the topological soliton state in the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model,” Nature Communications 7, 13986 (2016)

    2016

  14. [22]

    Observation of the topological Anderson insulator in disordered atomic wires,

    Eric J. Meier, Fangzhao Alex An, Alexandre Dauphin, Maria Maffei, Pietro Massignan, Taylor L. Hughes, and Bryce Gadway, “Observation of the topological Anderson insulator in disordered atomic wires,” Science 362, 929– 933 (2018)

    2018

  15. [23]

    Realizing robust edge-to-edge transport of atomic momentum states in a dynamically modulated synthetic lattice,

    Tao Yuan, Chao Zeng, Yi-Yi Mao, Fei-Fei Wu, Yan-Jun Xie, Wen-Zhuo Zhang, Han-Ning Dai, Yu-Ao Chen, and Jian-Wei Pan, “Realizing robust edge-to-edge transport of atomic momentum states in a dynamically modulated synthetic lattice,” Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L032005 (2023)

    2023

  16. [24]

    Observation of a symmetry-protected topological phase of interacting bosons with Rydberg atoms,

    Sylvain de L´ es´ eleuc, Vincent Lienhard, Pascal Scholl, Daniel Barredo, Sebastian Weber, Nicolai Lang, Hans Pe- ter B¨ uchler, Thierry Lahaye, and Antoine Browaeys, “Observation of a symmetry-protected topological phase of interacting bosons with Rydberg atoms,” Science 365,...

    2019

  17. [25]

    Realizing topological edge states with Rydberg- atom synthetic dimensions,

    S. K. Kanungo, J. D. Whalen, Y. Lu, M. Yuan, S. Das- gupta, F. B. Dunning, K. R. A. Hazzard, and T. C. Killian, “Realizing topological edge states with Rydberg- atom synthetic dimensions,” Nature Communications 13, 972 (2022)

    2022

  18. [26]

    Real- space imaging of a topologically protected edge state with ultracold atoms in an amplitude-chirped optical lattice,

    Martin Leder, Christopher Grossert, Lukas Sitta, Maxi- milian Genske, Achim Rosch, and Martin Weitz, “Real- space imaging of a topologically protected edge state with ultracold atoms in an amplitude-chirped optical lattice,” Nature Communications 7, 13112 (2016)

    2016

  19. [27]

    Observing topological insulator phases with a programmable quantum simulator,

    Or Katz, Lei Feng, Diego Porras, and Christo- pher Monroe, “Observing topological insulator phases with a programmable quantum simulator,” (2024), arXiv:2401.10362 [quant-ph]

    2024

  20. [28]

    Topological characterizations of an extended Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model,

    Dizhou Xie, Wei Gou, Teng Xiao, Bryce Gadway, and Bo Yan, “Topological characterizations of an extended Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model,” npj Quantum Information 5, 55 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    Geometrical pumping 15 with a bose-einstein condensate,

    H.-I Lu, M. Schemmer, L. M. Aycock, D. Genkina, S. Sugawa, and I. B. Spielman, “Geometrical pumping 15 with a bose-einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 200402 (2016)

    2016

  22. [30]

    Berry’s phase for energy bands in solids,

    J. Zak, “Berry’s phase for energy bands in solids,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2747–2750 (1989)

    1989

  23. [31]

    Spin–orbit-coupled fermions in an optical lattice clock,

    S. Kolkowitz, S. L. Bromley, T. Bothwell, M. L. Wall, G. E. Marti, A. P. Koller, X. Zhang, A. M. Rey, and J. Ye, “Spin–orbit-coupled fermions in an optical lattice clock,” Nature 542, 66–70 (2017)

    2017

  24. [32]

    Mea- suring gravitational attraction with a lattice atom inter- ferometer,

    Cristian D. Panda, Matthew J. Tao, Miguel Ceja, Justin Khoury, Guglielmo M. Tino, and Holger M¨ uller, “Mea- suring gravitational attraction with a lattice atom inter- ferometer,” Nature 631, 515–520 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    State-labeling Wannier-Stark atomic interferometers,

    B. Pelle, A. Hilico, G. Tackmann, Q. Beaufils, and F. Pereira dos Santos, “State-labeling Wannier-Stark atomic interferometers,” Phys. Rev. A87, 023601 (2013)

    2013

  26. [34]

    Quantum enhanced cavity qed inter- ferometer with partially delocalized atoms in lattices,

    Anjun Chu, Peiru He, James K. Thompson, and Ana Maria Rey, “Quantum enhanced cavity qed inter- ferometer with partially delocalized atoms in lattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 210401 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    A high-power clock laser spectrally tailored for high-fidelity quantum state engineering,

    Lingfeng Yan, Stefan Lannig, William R. Milner, Max N. Frankel, Ben Lewis, Dahyeon Lee, Kyungtae Kim, and Jun Ye, “A high-power clock laser spectrally tailored for high-fidelity quantum state engineering,” (2025), arXiv:2501.09343 [physics.atom-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Rabi spectroscopy and excitation inhomogeneity in a one-dimensional optical lattice clock,

    S. Blatt, J. W. Thomsen, G. K. Campbell, A. D. Ludlow, M. D. Swallows, M. J. Martin, M. M. Boyd, and J. Ye, “Rabi spectroscopy and excitation inhomogeneity in a one-dimensional optical lattice clock,” Phys. Rev. A 80, 052703 (2009)

    2009

  29. [37]

    Evaluation of lattice light shift at low 10 −19 uncertainty for a shallow lattice sr optical clock,

    Kyungtae Kim, Alexander Aeppli, Tobias Bothwell, and Jun Ye, “Evaluation of lattice light shift at low 10 −19 uncertainty for a shallow lattice sr optical clock,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 113203 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    Optical lattice clock with atoms confined in a shallow trap,

    Pierre Lemonde and Peter Wolf, “Optical lattice clock with atoms confined in a shallow trap,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 033409 (2005)

    2005

  31. [39]

    Synthetic spin-orbit coupling in an optical lattice clock,

    Michael L. Wall, Andrew P. Koller, Shuming Li, Xibo Zhang, Nigel R. Cooper, Jun Ye, and Ana Maria Rey, “Synthetic spin-orbit coupling in an optical lattice clock,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 035301 (2016)

    2016

  32. [40]

    Synthetic dimensions and spin-orbit cou- pling with an optical clock transition,

    L. F. Livi, G. Cappellini, M. Diem, L. Franchi, C. Clivati, M. Frittelli, F. Levi, D. Calonico, J. Catani, M. Inguscio, and L. Fallani, “Synthetic dimensions and spin-orbit cou- pling with an optical clock transition,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 220401 (2016)

    2016

  33. [41]

    Recent advances in spin-orbit coupled quantum gases,

    Shanchao Zhang and Gyu-Boong Jo, “Recent advances in spin-orbit coupled quantum gases,” Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 128, 75–86 (2019)

    2019

  34. [42]

    An accordion superlattice for controlling atom separa- tion in optical potentials,

    Simon Wili, Tilman Esslinger, and Konrad Viebahn, “An accordion superlattice for controlling atom separa- tion in optical potentials,” New Journal of Physics 25, 033037 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Quantization of particle transport,

    D. J. Thouless, “Quantization of particle transport,” Phys. Rev. B 27, 6083–6087 (1983)

    1983

  36. [44]

    Quantised adiabatic charge transport in the presence of substrate disorder and many- body interaction,

    Q. Niu and D. J. Thouless, “Quantised adiabatic charge transport in the presence of substrate disorder and many- body interaction,” Journal of Physics A Mathematical General 17, 2453–2462 (1984)

    1984

  37. [45]

    Berry phase effects on electronic properties,

    Di Xiao, Ming-Che Chang, and Qian Niu, “Berry phase effects on electronic properties,” Reviews of Modern Physics 82, 1959–2007 (2010)

    2010

  38. [46]

    Robustness of the pumping charge to dynamic disorder,

    R. Wang and Z. Song, “Robustness of the pumping charge to dynamic disorder,” Phys. Rev. B 100, 184304 (2019)

    2019

  39. [47]

    Local readout and control of current and kinetic energy operators in optical lattices,

    Alexander Impertro, Simon Karch, Julian F. Wienand, SeungJung Huh, Christian Schweizer, Immanuel Bloch, and Monika Aidelsburger, “Local readout and control of current and kinetic energy operators in optical lattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 063401 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    Topological transition in a non-hermitian quantum walk,

    M. S. Rudner and L. S. Levitov, “Topological transition in a non-hermitian quantum walk,” Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 065703 (2009)

    2009

  41. [49]

    Detection of Zak phases and topological in- variants in a chiral quantum walk of twisted photons,

    Filippo Cardano, Alessio D’Errico, Alexandre Dauphin, Maria Maffei, Bruno Piccirillo, Corrado de Lisio, Giulio de Filippis, Vittorio Cataudella, Enrico Santamato, Lorenzo Marrucci, Maciej Lewenstein, and Pietro Massignan, “Detection of Zak phases and topological in- variants i...

    2017

  42. [50]

    Topological characterization of chiral models through their long time dynamics,

    Maria Maffei, Alexandre Dauphin, Filippo Cardano, Ma- ciej Lewenstein, and Pietro Massignan, “Topological characterization of chiral models through their long time dynamics,” New Journal of Physics 20, 013023 (2018)

    2018

  43. [51]

    Detect- ing Multiparticle Entanglement of Dicke States,

    Bernd L¨ ucke, Jan Peise, Giuseppe Vitagliano, Jan Arlt, Luis Santos, G´ eza T´ oth, and Carsten Klempt, “Detect- ing Multiparticle Entanglement of Dicke States,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 155304 (2014)

    2014

  44. [52]

    Re- laxation of the Collective Magnetization of a Dense 3D Array of Interacting Dipolar S =3 Atoms,

    Lucas Gabardos, Bihui Zhu, Steven Lepoutre, Ana Maria Rey, Bruno Laburthe-Tolra, and Laurent Vernac, “Re- laxation of the Collective Magnetization of a Dense 3D Array of Interacting Dipolar S =3 Atoms,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 143401 (2020)

    2020

  45. [53]

    Measurement of gravitational acceleration by dropping atoms,

    Achim Peters, Keng Yeow Chung, and Steven Chu, “Measurement of gravitational acceleration by dropping atoms,” Nature 400, 849–852 (1999)

    1999

  46. [54]

    Precision measurement of the New- tonian gravitational constant using cold atoms,

    G. Rosi, F. Sorrentino, L. Cacciapuoti, M. Prevedelli, and G. M. Tino, “Precision measurement of the New- tonian gravitational constant using cold atoms,” Nature 510, 518–521 (2014)

    2014

  47. [55]

    A promising method for the measurement of the local acceleration of gravity us- ing Bloch oscillations of ultracold atoms in a vertical standing wave,

    P. Clad´ e, S. Guellati-Kh´ elifa, C. Schwob, F. Nez, L. Julien, and F. Biraben, “A promising method for the measurement of the local acceleration of gravity us- ing Bloch oscillations of ultracold atoms in a vertical standing wave,” EPL (Europhysics Letters) 71, 730–736 (2005)

    2005

  48. [56]

    Local gravity mea- surement with the combination of atom interferometry and bloch oscillations,

    Ren´ ee Charri` ere, Malo Cadoret, Nassim Zahzam, Yan- nick Bidel, and Alexandre Bresson, “Local gravity mea- surement with the combination of atom interferometry and bloch oscillations,” Phys. Rev. A 85, 013639 (2012)

    2012

  49. [57]

    Trapped-atom in- terferometer with ultracold sr atoms,

    Xian Zhang, Ruben Pablo del Aguila, Tommaso Mazzoni, Nicola Poli, and Guglielmo M. Tino, “Trapped-atom in- terferometer with ultracold sr atoms,” Phys. Rev. A 94, 043608 (2016)

    2016

  50. [58]

    Prob- ing gravity by holding atoms for 20 seconds,

    Victoria Xu, Matt Jaffe, Cristian D. Panda, Sofus L. Kristensen, Logan W. Clark, and Holger M¨ uller, “Prob- ing gravity by holding atoms for 20 seconds,” Science 366, 745–749 (2019)

    2019

  51. [59]

    Coherence limits in lattice atom interferometry at the one-minute scale,

    Cristian D. Panda, Matthew Tao, James Egelhoff, Miguel Ceja, Victoria Xu, and Holger M¨ uller, “Coherence limits in lattice atom interferometry at the one-minute scale,” Nature Physics 20, 1234–1239 (2024)

    2024

  52. [60]

    Atom interferometry with up to 24-photon-momentum-transfer beam splitters,

    Holger M¨ uller, Sheng-wey Chiow, Quan Long, Sven Her- rmann, and Steven Chu, “Atom interferometry with up to 24-photon-momentum-transfer beam splitters,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 180405 (2008)

    2008

  53. [61]

    Short- cuts to adiabatic Thouless pumping,

    Wenjie Liu, Yongguan Ke, and Chaohong Lee, “Short- cuts to adiabatic Thouless pumping,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2401.17081 (2024). 16

    2024 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Interacting rice-mele model: Bulk and boundaries,

    Y.-T. Lin, D. M. Kennes, M. Pletyukhov, C. S. We- ber, H. Schoeller, and V. Meden, “Interacting rice-mele model: Bulk and boundaries,” Phys. Rev. B 102, 085122 (2020)

    2020

  55. [63]

    Active Cancellation of Servo- Induced Noise on Stabilized Lasers via Feedforward,

    Lintao Li, William Huie, Neville Chen, Brian DeMarco, and Jacob P. Covey, “Active Cancellation of Servo- Induced Noise on Stabilized Lasers via Feedforward,” Physical Review Applied 18, 064005 (2022)

    2022

  56. [64]

    P k Jν+k(u)Jk(u)eikα = Jν 2u sin α 2 e−iν(π+α)/2

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.