Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 22 references

Improvement of Data Analytics Techniques in Reflection High Energy Electron Diffraction to Enable Machine Learning

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Mirror-based drift correction makes RHEED video analysis quantitative, enabling cross-sample machine-learning comparison for the first time.

desk verdict A useful, mostly sound RHEED preprocessing paper: the RSS drift-correction is new and cleanly demonstrated, but the cross-sample claims rest on an untested symmetry assumption and a qualitative two-growth comparison. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.09743 v1 pith:CN3W7TKN submitted 2025-01-16 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords RHEEDprincipalcomponentanalysisk-meansclusteringdriftcorrectionmolecularbeamepitaxyLaFeO3machinelearninginsitucharacterization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the main obstacle to applying principal component analysis and k-means clustering to reflection high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED) videos is image drift: sample and stage motion translate the pattern across the screen, and the algorithms then learn the motion instead of the surface. The authors introduce a residual-sum-of-squares (RSS) alignment step that mirrors each RHEED frame to locate the specular spot and recenters the frames, along with intensity rescaling that enhances weak Kikuchi bands. With drift removed, PCA eigenvalues and k-means clusters from artificially drifted recordings match the originals, and the approach enables the first quantitative comparison of RHEED videos from two separately grown LaFeO3 film samples. If correct, this preprocessing pathway lets new growths be projected onto eigenvectors and centroids of past samples in real time, which is a step toward machine-learning-accelerated film synthesis.

What carries the argument

The central object is the residual sum of squares (RSS) alignment procedure. For each RHEED frame, the code mirrors the image across a vertical axis, slides the mirror in one-pixel steps, and takes the mirror position with minimum summed squared difference as the horizontal center of the pattern; a low-intensity filter that zeroes values below 90% of the maximum specular intensity keeps background signal from dominating the RSS calculation. A second pass, cropping to the specular spot and mirroring across a horizontal axis, fixes the vertical center. This turns frame-to-frame translation into a removable nuisance and is what allows PCA and k-means to be run on combined recordings from different samples, because the algorithm aligns both drift within a single growth and the systematic offset between separately mounted samples.

What would settle it

Record a RHEED video at an azimuth where the pattern is known to be asymmetric, apply RSS alignment, and compare the recovered center against the known true pattern location: if the recovered center shifts by more than a pixel when no motion is applied, or fails to track an imposed pixel offset, the symmetry premise fails. A simpler synthetic version is to take a diffraction pattern with no bilateral symmetry, translate it by known amounts, run the RSS algorithm, and check whether the inferred translations match the imposed ones; a mismatch directly invalidates the alignment as a general-purpose correction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that a mirror-symmetry-based RSS alignment algorithm removes the effect of pattern translation during RHEED recording, so that PCA and k-means cluster on physical surface features rather than on image motion. Applying this alignment to a recording with an artificial drift reproduces nearly identical eigenvalues, eigenvectors, and cluster centroids as the original recording, whereas the unaligned drifted recording produces components that encode the translation itself. Applying the same procedure across two LaFeO3 films grown under nominally identical conditions shows that both begin in the same substrate cluster and then diverge, with the second sample losing Kikuchi bands and sharp spots, indicating the onset of island formation or amorphization that would be obscured by unaligned PCA and clustering. This cross-sample comparison, which the paper identifies as a first for PCA and k-means on RHEED data, is what the RSS alignment makes possible.

Load-bearing premise

The whole correction rides on the claim that a RHEED pattern is mirror-symmetric across its vertical axis and that the specular spot alone is symmetric about a horizontal axis; if a chosen azimuth, surface termination, shadow edge, or refraction effect breaks that symmetry, the RSS alignment will find the wrong center and reintroduce false features into the PCA and clusters.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The preprocessing recipe of cropping, frame decimation, intensity transformation, and RSS alignment makes PCA and k-means results reproducible across separately recorded growths rather than only within one video.
  • New RHEED videos can be projected onto the eigenvector images and k-means centroid images of a library of previous samples, turning unsupervised clustering into a quantitative similarity check against known good and defective growths.
  • The RSS alignment approach should transfer to any RHEED geometry in which the diffraction pattern is mirror-symmetric, including other perovskite oxide films and other molecular beam epitaxy systems.
  • Eigenvalue time traces reveal oscillatory structure too weak for conventional specular-spot intensity monitoring, so the analysis extracts additional surface information from the same RHEED data without changing the growth conditions.
  • Because alignment works best for videos that begin with clean substrates and sharp features, it is most directly applicable to the early-growth regime, with performance expected to degrade as the pattern becomes faint or amorphous.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the success of RSS alignment depends on the pattern retaining bilateral symmetry; at off-symmetry azimuths, or during early nucleation when spots dominate, the mirrored-image minimum may not correspond to the true center, so the method should be validated against independently known translations at several azimuths before generalizing.
  • Editorial inference: the intensity transforms (power, inverse power) mainly aid visual interpretation and do not change the PCA results, which implies that a fully autonomous ML pipeline could skip the nonlinear rescaling and save computation, using only cropping and alignment.
  • Editorial inference: because RSS alignment centers to within a couple of pixels, the residual translation sets a floor on the smallest diffraction features the PCA and k-means can faithfully separate; features smaller than the residual jitter will be smeared into shared components and could be missed.
  • Editorial inference: extending the cross-sample comparison to arbitrary chamber geometries would require a more general feature-based or two-dimensional correlation alignment rather than mirror symmetry, since the symmetry assumption is tied to the specular geometry of the specific electron-beam and screen arrangement used here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes and demonstrates a preprocessing pipeline for RHEED video data to enable unsupervised PCA and k-means clustering across different MBE-grown LaFeO3 samples. The pipeline comprises frame cropping, intensity transformations (piecewise, power, inverse power), and a residual-sum-of-squares (RSS) alignment procedure that uses mirror symmetry to identify the specular spot and correct for pattern translation. The authors show on a single LFO growth that a synthetic constant-rate drift changes PCA/k-means results and that RSS alignment nearly restores the original results. They then apply the pipeline to two LFO films grown at nominally identical conditions, reporting common initial clusters and subsequent divergence, and interpret this as the first cross-sample quantitative RHEED comparison.

Significance. If the claims are fully supported, the work would be a useful methods contribution to RHEED-based machine learning: it addresses a real preprocessing problem, uses unsupervised methods without fitting to a desired output, ships openly available data, and provides a controlled synthetic-drift test that cleanly demonstrates the effect of translation on PCA/k-means. The power-transform robustness check is also a positive feature, since it shows that the unsupervised results are not forced by the intensity rescaling choice. However, the central cross-sample claim rests on the symmetry assumption of the alignment algorithm and on mostly qualitative validation, so the significance is contingent on additional quantitative tests.

major comments (3)
  1. [II.B, III.B] The RSS alignment algorithm assumes bilateral symmetry of RHEED patterns about the vertical axis and horizontal symmetry of the specular spot. This assumption is load-bearing for the cross-sample comparison in Figures 6 and 7, but it is tested only against a synthetic constant-rate translation of a single symmetric pattern (Figures 4 and 5). If the symmetry is broken by off-azimuth alignment, vicinal surface steps, Kikuchi-band contrast asymmetries, shadow edges, or refraction, the mirror-based RSS minimization will bias the recovered center, and because each frame is aligned independently, a pattern-dependent asymmetry during growth would be encoded as drift or as a physical difference. The authors should either validate the symmetry assumption across azimuths and growth stages or quantify the alignment bias and show that it is small compared with the physical differences they report.
  2. [III.B] The assertion that RSS alignment aligns recordings from different samples 'with accuracy within a couple of pixels' is not backed by any error analysis or ground-truth comparison. No metric is reported for the residual alignment error on real data, and no independent check (e.g., tracking a stationary feature, comparing with manual alignment, or measuring the post-alignment scatter of the specular spot position) is provided. Without such a metric, the 'quantitative comparison' claim in Section III.B and the Conclusion is not established, because residual misalignment could contribute to the eigenvalue and cluster differences observed in Figures 6 and 7.
  3. [III.B, Figures 6-7] The cross-sample comparison is interpreted qualitatively: cluster labels are assigned by visual inspection of centroid images, and the divergence between growths is described narratively. The authors should add a quantitative measure of sample-to-sample similarity in PCA space or cluster occupancy (e.g., distances between sample trajectories in the first few principal components, cluster centroid correlations, or a confusion-style comparison of cluster assignments) to support the claim that the pipeline 'allows for quantitative comparison of RHEED videos' rather than merely a side-by-side visual display.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Abstract] There is a typo in 'osciallations'; the sentence would also read more smoothly as 'recognizing that the sample has become amorphous or that large islands have formed on the surface.'
  2. [II.C] 'outline in 12' should be 'outlined in Ref. 12', and 'h5Ppy' should likely be 'h5py'.
  3. [III.A] 'Due to the power recalling function' should read 'Due to the power rescaling function'.
  4. [III.A, Figure 2] The text says panels (a-c) and (g-h) are raw and (d-f) and (j-l) are transformed, but the caption lists (a-f) as eigenvalues and (g-l) as eigenvectors; this leaves panel (i) unaccounted for and should be corrected.
  5. [III.B] 'procedes' should be 'proceeds', and 'the development of the films surface' should be 'the development of the film's surface'.
  6. [II.B] The low-intensity filter threshold at 90% of maximum spot intensity is introduced without a sensitivity analysis; a sentence justifying this value or showing robustness would help reproducibility.
  7. [Data availability] The data repository is cited, but no mention is made of code availability; sharing the preprocessing code would aid reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the analysis is unsupervised, the RSS alignment is a well-defined preprocessing step with an explicit symmetry assumption, and the central cross-sample comparison is demonstrated on held-out recordings rather than derived from fitted parameters.

full rationale

The paper derives no predictive quantity from a fitted parameter. PCA and k-means are unsupervised: no labels are used, and no parameter is adjusted to force a desired clustering outcome. The preprocessing choices (gamma, threshold T) are user-selected, but Section III.A explicitly shows that the power transform leaves the PCA eigenvalues, eigenvectors, and k-means clusters nearly unchanged, so the central results are not an artifact of those choices. The RSS alignment algorithm is a well-defined, self-contained procedure: it finds the horizontal and vertical centers of a diffraction pattern by minimizing the residual sum of squares between the image and its mirror image. This assumes bilateral symmetry of the pattern, which is an explicit physical assumption, not a circular one. If the assumption is violated, alignment could be biased, but that is a correctness or robustness concern, not a circularity. The claim that RSS alignment mitigates translation is tested on a synthetic constant-rate translation (Figure 4 vs. Figure 5), showing that PCA and k-means on the aligned drifting video reproduce the results of the original video. The cross-sample demonstration (Figures 6 and 7) is an empirical observation about two growths, not a quantity that was constructed to equal its input. The only self-citation to prior work (Ref. 12) concerns the PCA/k-means implementation and video capture procedure; these are methodological choices, and the central novelty lies in the RSS alignment and intensity transformations, which are described and tested in this paper. No step reduces by construction to its inputs, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The symmetry assumption, though potentially a limitation, does not make the derivation circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities or forces. Its free parameters are user-chosen preprocessing constants (gamma, threshold, frame rates, component counts), none of which are fitted to a target result. The main load-bearing assumptions concern the symmetry of RHEED patterns and the translational nature of drift.

free parameters (6)
  • Power transform gamma = 2.0
    Chosen to enhance high-intensity features (Section III.A). The paper states this transformation does not significantly change PCA/k-means results, so it is not fitted to force a conclusion.
  • Piecewise threshold T = Determined per image from pixel histogram
    Used to suppress background in the piecewise intensity transform (Section II.B). The selection rule is described only qualitatively, and the value is image-dependent.
  • Frame rate for PCA = 1 fps or 0.2 fps depending on growth rate
    Chosen by the user to balance information content and computational cost (Section II.B). This affects which temporal features enter the PCA.
  • Number of PCA components = 6
    Retains >99.98% of variance (Section II.C). This truncation is user-specified and controls the dimensionality of the k-means input.
  • k-means cluster range = 1 to 10
    User-specified; the paper notes clusters become difficult to interpret beyond k=10 (Section II.C).
  • RSS low-intensity filter threshold = 90% of maximum spot intensity
    Used to isolate high-intensity spots before mirror alignment (Section II.B). This is a hand-set cutoff that influences alignment accuracy.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption RHEED patterns exhibit bilateral symmetry across the vertical axis.
    Invoked as the basis for the RSS horizontal alignment (Section II.B). This is a physical assumption about the diffraction geometry that may fail for certain azimuths or in the presence of shadow edges.
  • domain assumption Specular RHEED spots are symmetric about a horizontal axis.
    Used for vertical alignment after cropping the specular spot (Section II.B). The paper does not justify this symmetry for all growth stages.
  • domain assumption Sample motion during growth appears as a rigid translation in the image.
    The RSS algorithm corrects only translations; rotations, scaling, or distortions are not handled (Section II.B). The drift test was a pure translation of 25 pixels.
  • domain assumption PCA and k-means on pixel intensities capture physically meaningful film-surface states.
    The analysis assumes that pixel-level variance, after preprocessing, corresponds to changes in surface structure rather than artifacts. This is the premise of the cross-sample comparison.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Improvement of Data Analytics Techniques in Reflection High Energy Electron Diffraction to Enable Machine Learning." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CN3W7TKN

@misc{pith2026250109743,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Improvement of Data Analytics Techniques in Reflection High Energy Electron Diffraction to Enable Machine Learning},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CN3W7TKN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.09743}
}
abstract

Perovskite oxides such as LaFeO$_3$ are a well-studied family of materials that possess a wide range of useful and novel properties. Successfully synthesizing perovskite oxide samples usually requires a significant number of growth attempts and a detailed film characterization on each sample to find the optimal growth window of a material. The most common real-time \textit{in situ} diagnostic technique available during molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) synthesis is reflection high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED). Conventional use of RHEED allows a highly experienced operator to determine growth rate by monitoring intensity osciallations and make some qualitative observations during growth, such as recognizing the sample has become amorphous or recognizing that large islands have formed on the surface. However, due to a lack of theoretical understanding of the diffraction patterns, finer, more precise levels of observations are challenging. To address these limitations, we implement new data analytics techniques in the growth of three LaFeO$_3$ samples on Nb-doped SrTiO$_3$ by MBE. These techniques improve our ability to perform unsupervised machine learning using principal component analysis (PCA) and k-means clustering by using drift correction to overcome sample or stage motion during growth and intensity transformations that highlight more subtle features in the images such as Kikuchi bands. With this approach, we enable the first demonstration of PCA and k-means across multiple samples, allowing for quantitative comparison of RHEED videos for two LaFeO$_3$ film samples. These capabilities set the stage for real-time processing of RHEED data during growth to enable machine learning-accelerated film synthesis.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.09743 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) The intensity transformation functions used on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Results from the PCA of a recording containing the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Results from the PCA of a recording containing the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Results from PCA and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Results from PCA and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Results from the PCA of a recording containing 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Results from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

22 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author author Z. Mitura ,\ title title R H E E D from epitaxially grown thin films , \ https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218625X99000470 journal journal Surface Review and Letters \ volume 06 ,\ pages 497--516 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

  2. [2]

    author author W. Braun ,\ @noop title Applied RHEED: Reflection High-Energy Electron Diffraction during Crystal Growth ,\ Vol.\ volume 154 \ ( publisher Springer ,\ address Berlin ; New York ,\ year 1999 ) NoStop

  3. [3]

    author author M. Dabrowska-Szata ,\ title title Analysis of R H E E D pattern from semiconductor surfaces , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0254-0584(02)00569-2 journal journal Materials Chemistry and Physics \ volume 81 ,\ pages 257--259 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

  4. [4]

    Michalski \ and\ author M

    author author B. Michalski \ and\ author M. Plechawska-Wójcik ,\ title title Comparison of lenet-5, alexnet and googlenet models in handwriting recognition , \ https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.2919 journal journal Journal of Computer Sciences Institute \ volume 23 ,\ pages 145--151 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

  5. [5]

    \ Zhu , author T

    author author J.-Y. \ Zhu , author T. Park , author P. Isola ,\ and\ author A. A. \ Efros ,\ title title Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks , \ in\ https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2017.244 booktitle 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) \ ( year 2017 )\ pp.\ pages 2242--2251 NoStop

  6. [6]

    Belianinov , author R

    author author A. Belianinov , author R. Vasudevan , author E. Strelcov , author C. Steed , author S. M. \ Yang , author A. Tselev , author S. Jesse , author M. Biegalski , author G. Shipman , author C. Symons , author A. Borisevich , author R. Archibald ,\ and\ author S. Kalinin ,\ title title Big data and deep data in scanning and electron microscopies: ...

  7. [7]

    author author S. V. \ Kalinin , author E. Strelcov , author A. Belianinov , author S. Somnath , author R. K. \ Vasudevan , author E. J. \ Lingerfelt , author R. K. \ Archibald , author C. Chen , author R. Proksch , author N. Laanait ,\ and\ author S. Jesse ,\ title title Big, Deep , and Smart Data in Scanning Probe Microscopy , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/a...

  8. [8]

    Strelcov , author A

    author author E. Strelcov , author A. Belianinov , author Y.-H. \ Hsieh , author S. Jesse , author A. P. \ Baddorf , author Y.-H. \ Chu ,\ and\ author S. V. \ Kalinin ,\ title title Deep Data Analysis of Conductive Phenomena on Complex Oxide Interfaces : Physics from Data Mining , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/nn502029b journal journal ACS Nano \ volume 8 ,\ ...

Show all 22 references
  1. [9]

    author author R. K. \ Vasudevan , author A. Belianinov , author A. G. \ Gianfrancesco , author A. P. \ Baddorf , author A. Tselev , author S. V. \ Kalinin ,\ and\ author S. Jesse ,\ title title Big data in reciprocal space: Sliding fast Fourier transforms for determining perio...

  2. [10]

    Kaufmann , author C

    author author K. Kaufmann , author C. Zhu , author A. S. \ Rosengarten , author D. Maryanovsky , author T. J. \ Harrington , author E. Marin ,\ and\ author K. S. \ Vecchio ,\ title title Crystal symmetry determination in electron diffraction using machine learning , \ https://...

  3. [11]

    author author R. K. \ Vasudevan , author A. Tselev , author A. P. \ Baddorf ,\ and\ author S. V. \ Kalinin ,\ title title Big- Data Reflection High Energy Electron Diffraction Analysis for Understanding Epitaxial Film Growth Processes , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/nn504730n jour...

  4. [12]

    author author S. R. \ Provence , author S. Thapa , author R. Paudel , author T. K. \ Truttmann , author A. Prakash , author B. Jalan ,\ and\ author R. B. \ Comes ,\ title title Machine learning analysis of perovskite oxides grown by molecular beam epitaxy , \ https://doi.org/1...

  5. [13]

    author author Y. E. \ Suyolcu , author G. Christiani , author P. T. \ Gemperline , author S. R. \ Provence , author A. Bussmann-Holder , author R. B. \ Comes , author P. A. \ van Aken ,\ and\ author G. Logvenov ,\ title title Engineering ordered arrangements of oxygen vacancie...

  6. [14]

    Gliebe \ and\ author A

    author author K. Gliebe \ and\ author A. Sehirlioglu ,\ title title Distinct thin film growth characteristics determined through comparative dimension reduction techniques , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 130 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

  7. [15]

    author author S. B. \ Torrisi , author M. R. \ Carbone , author B. A. \ Rohr , author J. H. \ Montoya , author Y. Ha , author J. Yano , author S. K. \ Suram ,\ and\ author L. Hung ,\ title title Random forest machine learning models for interpretable x-ray absorption near-edge...

  8. [16]

    Takahashi \ and\ author L

    author author K. Takahashi \ and\ author L. Takahashi ,\ title title Creating Machine Learning - Driven Material Recipes Based on Crystal Structure , \ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b03527 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters \ volume 10 ,\ pages 28...

  9. [17]

    Lee , author T

    author author K. Lee , author T. Brown , author G. Dagnall , author R. Bicknell-Tassius , author A. Brown ,\ and\ author G. May ,\ title title Using neural networks to construct models of the molecular beam epitaxy process , \ https://doi.org/10.1109/66.827338 journal journal ...

  10. [18]

    author author C. C. \ Price , author Y. Li , author G. Zhou , author R. Younas , author S. S. \ Zeng , author T. H. \ Scanlon , author J. M. \ Munro ,\ and\ author C. L. \ Hinkle ,\ title title Predicting and accelerating nanomaterial synthesis using machine learning featuriza...

  11. [19]

    Khaireh-Walieh , author A

    author author A. Khaireh-Walieh , author A. Arnoult , author S. Plissard ,\ and\ author P. R. \ Wiecha ,\ title title Monitoring mbe substrate deoxidation via rheed image-sequence analysis by deep learning , \ @noop journal journal Crystal Growth & Design \ volume 23 ,\ pages ...

  12. [20]

    Kwoen \ and\ author Y

    author author J. Kwoen \ and\ author Y. Arakawa ,\ title title Classification of reflection high-energy electron diffraction pattern using machine learning , \ @noop journal journal Crystal Growth & Design \ volume 20 ,\ pages 5289--5293 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

  13. [21]

    author author A. R. \ Burton , author R. Paudel , author B. Matthews , author M. Sassi , author S. R. \ Spurgeon , author B. H. \ Farnum ,\ and\ author R. B. \ Comes ,\ title title Thickness dependent oer electrocatalysis of epitaxial La Fe O _3 thin films , \ https://doi.org/...

  14. [22]

    Griebel \ and\ author H

    author author M. Griebel \ and\ author H. Harbrecht ,\ title title Singular value decomposition versus sparse grids: refined complexity estimates , \ https://doi.org/10.1093/imanum/dry039 journal journal IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis \ volume 39 ,\ pages 1652--1671 ( year ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.