Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 148 references

Unveiling the Interior Structure and Thermal Evolution of Super-Earth GJ 486b

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that GJ 486b, modeled with an Earth-like fully differentiated interior, has a core 1.34 times larger than Earth's, a central pressure of about 1171 GPa, a magma ocean that solidifies in roughly 0.93 million years, and an…

desk verdict Useful coupled interior-thermal-volatile framework, but the headline numbers for GJ 486b rest on inconsistent mass-radius inputs and a chosen water inventory, so the specific claims need revision before they can be trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.09963 v1 pith:GSCJOXCI submitted 2025-01-17 astro-ph.EP

Chandan K. Sahu , Liton Majumdar , Sudipta Mridha , Harshit Krishna This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords super-EarthsGJ486bplanetaryinteriorstructurethermalevolutionmagmaoceanatmosphericescapesecondaryatmosphereJWSTobservations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

GJ 486b is a warm, 3-Earth-mass planet orbiting an M dwarf, and its interior cannot be observed directly. This paper asks what the planet would look like inside if its composition and layering resemble Earth's, and what that interior would do as it cooled. The model predicts an iron-rich core about 1.34 times the size of Earth's, a central pressure near 1171 GPa, and a magma ocean that solidifies within about 0.93 million years. As the ocean freezes, water is outgassed and then split by starlight, leaving a thick water- and oxygen-rich atmosphere. The authors present this as a self-consistent picture that connects JWST's ambiguous water detection to the planet's unseen interior.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is SERPINT (Structure and Evolution model for Rocky Planet INTeriors), a 1-D spherical model that couples four modules: structure, thermal, volatile, and escape. The structure module solves hydrostatic equilibrium with layer-specific equations of state: a Holzapfel EOS for liquid ε-Fe modified by an impurity factor for the core, and a Vinet EOS for a two-layer silicate mantle with phase-transition boundaries at 23.5 GPa and 125 GPa. The thermal module evolves mantle potential temperature, melt fraction, solidification radius, and viscosity using radiogenic heating and a parameterized solidus-liquidus profile. The volatile and escape modules move water between melt, solid, and atmosphere, and couple photolysis, hydrogen and oxygen escape through energy-limited XUV flux, and crossover-mass drag. The identity that carries the argument is self-consistency: structure sets pressures and radii, which set solidus conditions, which set outgassing, which sets atmospheric greenhouse and escape, which feeds back on cooling.

What would settle it

Recompute the interior with a different core impurity fraction, such as 10% or 30%, or with a solid inner core, and check whether any Earth-like parameter choice reproduces both the planet's bulk density and a central pressure consistent with experimental iron equations of state at terapascal pressures; failure would rule out the predicted 4600 km core and 1171 GPa central pressure. On the observational side, a JWST spectrum that definitively attributes the 2.87–5.14 µm slope to starspots rather than water would falsify the specific water-rich evolutionary branch.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that an Earth-like structural template—a fully liquid iron core carrying 20% by weight of light elements (silicon, oxygen, sulfur) and a two-layer silicate mantle with no crust or water layer—can account for GJ 486b's observed mass and radius and yields a specific interior: a core-radius fraction of 0.537, a core radius near 4600 km, and a central pressure of about 1171 GPa, roughly three times Earth's. Coupled to this structure, the thermal model starts the planet as a 5000 K magma ocean and finds that the mantle cools and becomes rheologically solid in about 0.93 million years, with the lower mantle freezing first. During that freeze, water dissolved in the melt is expelled into the atmosphere, building a steam atmosphere that photolyzes under XUV irradiation; hydrogen escapes while oxygen is first consumed oxidizing FeO to Fe2O3 in the melt and then, once the melt is oxidized, accumulates in the atmosphere. The paper argues this scenario matches the water-rich reading of the JWST transmission spectrum and predicts a secondary atmosphere whose composition could be checked by future observations.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes GJ 486b's interior is Earth-like in the specific sense of a fully differentiated planet with an entirely liquid iron core containing 20% by weight light elements and a two-layer silicate mantle with no crust or water layer, with that 20% impurity calibrated to Earth's PREM profile rather than to any observation of GJ 486b.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If GJ 486b is Earth-like inside, its center sits at roughly 1171 GPa, more than three times Earth's central pressure, placing concrete demands on equations of state for iron-silicon-oxygen-sulfur mixtures at terapascal pressures.
  • The mantle would have solidified within about a million years, so any magma ocean is long gone; today's surface should be in a solid-state, likely stagnant-lid convective regime.
  • The early outgassing sequence predicts a transient steam atmosphere with water pressures rising to roughly 1275 bars, followed by an atmosphere enriched in oxygen as hydrogen escapes.
  • Changing the initial water inventory from 0.2 to 20 Earth oceans shifts the solidification time from 0.02 to 1.82 million years, making water content a first-order control on early thermal history.
  • JWST observations designed to detect trace gases and improve wavelength coverage could distinguish the modeled water-and-oxygen secondary atmosphere from the stellar-contamination alternative.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The 20% by weight core impurity and the 10-Earth-ocean initial water budget are calibrated to Earth, not to GJ 486b; the predicted core radius, central pressure, and solidification time should shift if stellar abundance data or formation models constrain different values.
  • Because the model treats the core as fully liquid and imposes a no-flux core-mantle boundary, it omits core cooling and inner-core solidification; including those would change the heat budget and could lengthen or shorten the magma-ocean lifetime.
  • The same coupled machinery could be run on other hot super-Earths with measured mass and radius, and the ratio of predicted outgassed water to observed atmospheric water would test whether Earth-like interiors are typical or just one solution among many.
  • A direct observational test is to search for O2 or other photolysis products in the planet's transmission spectrum; because the model predicts oxygen accumulation only after the melt's FeO is oxidized, an O2 detection would trace the interior oxidation state, not just the atmosphere.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces SERPINT, a one-dimensional coupled interior-structure and thermal-atmosphere evolution model, and applies it to the super-Earth GJ 486b. Assuming an Earth-like, fully differentiated interior with a 20 wt% light-element impurity in the core and an initial budget of 10 Earth oceans of water, the model predicts a core radius of about 4600 km (1.34 times Earth's), a central pressure of about 1171 GPa, and mantle solidification after about 0.93 Myr. The model also predicts a water-rich steam atmosphere that later becomes enriched in oxygen through photolysis and hydrogen escape, which the authors connect to the water-rich interpretation of JWST transmission spectra by Moran et al. (2023). The structural model is validated against PREM for Earth. The central quantitative claims, however, depend on adopted planetary parameters and on several unconstrained model inputs, and the manuscript does not propagate uncertainties or systematically test the sensitivity of the headline numbers.

Significance. If the results are robust, the paper would provide a useful end-to-end modeling framework linking the interior structure, thermal evolution, and early atmospheric composition of a JWST-observed super-Earth, and it makes concrete, falsifiable predictions about core size, central pressure, and solidification timescale. The PREM validation of the structural module is a genuine strength, as is the transparent presentation of the governing equations and the explicit sensitivity study of the initial water budget in Appendix C. However, the central predictions are conditional on at least three unconstrained or loosely constrained inputs: the adopted mass and radius of GJ 486b, the 20% core impurity fraction calibrated to Earth, and the assumed initial water inventory. Because the manuscript presents the resulting numbers as the paper's headline results, the significance of the specific predictions is limited until those dependencies are quantified.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 1 and Sec. 3.2] The adopted mass and radius of GJ 486b, 3.00 M⊕ and 1.343 R⊕, are load-bearing inputs to the structural module, yet the paper itself quotes the alternative published values of 2.81 M⊕ and 1.31 R⊕ when comparing with Meier et al. (2024) and reports that those values give a core radius of 4900 km rather than 4600 km. The abstract and conclusions present the 4600 km core and 1171 GPa central pressure as the results without stating which published parameter set they use or propagating the published uncertainties. Since the hydrostatic structure equations (Eqs. 2-4) use M and R as boundary conditions, the quoted structural predictions are not robust to this parameter choice; the authors should either justify the adopted values relative to the alternative, or present results for both published parameter sets and for the marginalized mass-radius posteriors.
  2. [Sec. 2.5.1 and Appendix C] The thermal-evolution headline, 'the planet's mantle cools and solidifies over approximately 0.93 million years,' is a single-point output for the assumed initial water inventory of 10 Earth oceans. Appendix C shows that this time ranges from 0.02 Myr at 0.2 EO to 1.82 Myr at 20 EO, i.e., an order-of-magnitude sensitivity. The abstract and conclusions do not state that 0.93 Myr is conditional on an assumed, not observationally inferred, water budget. The initial water inventory should be treated as a free parameter with a stated prior or constrained from formation models, and the conclusions should present the solidification time as a function of that parameter rather than as a point prediction.
  3. [Sec. 3.1 and Sec. 2.2.1] The 20 wt% core impurity factor f is calibrated by fitting the model to Earth's PREM profile, and the same f is then applied to GJ 486b with no sensitivity analysis. The core radius and central pressure depend directly on the core EOS via the impurity factor (Appendix A, Eq. A5), so a different—and equally plausible—impurity fraction would change the predicted 4600 km core radius and 1171 GPa central pressure. The authors should vary f over a reasonable range (e.g., 10-30 wt%) and report the resulting spread in the structural predictions before presenting these values as definitive results.
  4. [Eq. (1) and Eq. (13)] Two equations in the methods section need correction. First, Eq. (1) as written yields g = 4πGρr for a constant-density sphere, which is a factor of 3 larger than the correct hydrostatic result g = (4πG/3)ρr. If this equation were implemented literally, the reported PREM validation (central pressure 371 GPa for Earth) would not hold, so it is likely a typographical error in the displayed formula; nevertheless the equation must be fixed because it is central to the structure calculation. Second, Eq. (13) states that P is in GPa, but the numerical coefficients are consistent with P in Pa; for example, the quoted 11747 K condition at the core-mantle boundary follows from the lower-mantle solidus only if P is in Pa. This unit inconsistency must be resolved in the text, as it directly affects the solidification-radius evolution and the reported thermal history.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.1 and Sec. 3.2] The reported densities are missing a factor of 1000: Earth's central density should be about 1.277×10^4 kg m^-3, not 12.77 kg m^-3, and GJ 486b's central density should be about 1.757×10^4 kg m^-3, not 17.57 kg m^-3.
  2. [Sec. 3.2] The comparison with Meier et al. (2024) reads 'a core size of 0.586 R⊕, corresponding to 4900 km'; since 0.586 × R⊕ is about 3734 km, the intended quantity is presumably 0.586 Rp (planet radius), giving 4900 km for Rp ≈ 1.31 R⊕. This should be clarified.
  3. [Sec. 2.3.1 and Sec. 3.3] The text says saturation timescales in the 7-9 Gyr range were sampled, while Sec. 3.3 states that the XUV luminosity decreases after one billion years, when the saturation time is exceeded. These statements are inconsistent and should be reconciled.
  4. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption lists '238U, 238U, 238Th and 40K'; the second species should be 235U.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

The 'water-rich atmosphere' conclusion is built into the assumed pure-water atmospheric composition, so that part of the abstract is circular; the interior-structure numbers are genuine forward-model outputs.

  1. self definitional [Section 2 (Methods, first paragraph); Abstract; Section 5 (Conclusions, bullet 9)]
    "For the secondary atmosphere of GJ 486b, we assume a pure water composition, based on Moran et al. (2023). ... As the magma ocean cools, water is released from the melt, forming a water-rich atmosphere during early solidification. ... Our models show the presence of a thick water atmosphere which is consistent with the observations of Moran et al. (2023)."

    The volatile module (Sec. 2.5.1) tracks only water and oxygen produced from an assumed 10 EO water inventory (Eqs. 24-30); no non-water atmospheric species are included. A pure-water secondary atmosphere is therefore water-rich by definition, so the abstract's 'water-rich atmosphere during early solidification' is not an emergent prediction but a restatement of the input assumption. Using that output as consistency with Moran et al. (2023)'s water-rich retrieval makes the assumption do evidential work.

full rationale

The structure and thermal-evolution headline numbers are not circular. The core radius (4600 km), core-radius fraction (0.537), central pressure (1171 GPa), and solidification time (0.93 Myr) are obtained by integrating the stated hydrostatic-equilibrium equations (Eqs. 1-4) and energy/volatile equations (Eqs. 16, 24-30) from explicit inputs (M = 3.00 M⊕, R = 1.343 R⊕, 20% core impurity, 10 EO initial water); they are not defined to be equal to those inputs. The paper itself discloses the sensitivity of the core size to the adopted mass-radius values by citing Meier et al. (2024)'s 4900 km result, and Appendix C discloses that solidification time ranges from 0.02 to 1.82 Myr as the assumed initial water inventory varies from 0.2 to 20 EO. Those are robustness limitations, not circularity. The only step that reduces by construction is the water-rich atmosphere conclusion, because the model assumes a pure-water secondary atmosphere from the start; the core-structure results and the PREM validation remain self-contained.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model's outputs depend on a chain of externally calibrated parameters (core impurity, emissivity, escape efficiency, initial water) and domain assumptions (Earth-like composition, 0-D atmosphere). The core impurity fraction is fitted to Earth; the water inventory is assumed; the XUV parameters are sampled from prior stellar models. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (8)
  • Core impurity fraction f = 20% by weight (12% Si, 7% O, 1% S)
    Calibrated in Sec. 3.1 to match Earth's PREM density profile; applied unchanged to GJ 486b. Directly sets core density and hence core radius.
  • Initial water inventory = 10 Earth oceans
    Assumed in Sec. 2.5.1; controls atmospheric water pressure and solidification time; Appendix C shows solidification time scales from 0.02 to 1.82 Myr as water varies from 0.2 to 20 EO.
  • Initial mantle potential temperature = 5000 K
    Set in Sec. 2.3.3 to start entirely molten; affects the early cooling trajectory and solidification history.
  • Emissivity lambda = 0.2
    Chosen in Sec. 2.4 following Barth et al. 2021; directly reduces outgoing flux in Eq. 19, prolonging the magma ocean stage.
  • XUV absorption efficiency epsilon = 0.3
    Adopted in Sec. 2.5.2 from Luger & Barnes 2015; controls energy-limited escape rate and atmospheric loss.
  • Stellar saturation timescale tsat = sampled in 7-9 Gyr
    Used in Eq. 9 for XUV luminosity evolution; sampled from Birky et al. 2021 range, not measured for GJ 486.
  • Constant C in solid-state heat flux = 2.12035
    Calibrated in Sec. 2.5 to yield 0.1 W/m2 for Earth at 1600 K; controls post-solidification cooling rate.
  • Melt-solid water partition coefficient kH2O = 0.01
    Taken from Schaefer et al. 2016; sets how much water is trapped in solid rock versus retained in melt.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption GJ 486b has an Earth-like bulk composition, fully differentiated into an iron-rich core and silicate mantle.
    Stated in Sec. 2; no observational data exist on the interior composition, and a volatile-rich or otherwise different composition would change the structure results.
  • domain assumption Core is 100% liquid (no solid inner core) and contains 20% light-element impurities.
    Sec. 2.2.1 and Sec. 3.1; used to match PREM, but real cores can have solid parts and different light-element content.
  • domain assumption Upper and lower mantle are uniform layers with fixed EOS parameters from Seager et al. 2007, with phase transitions at 23.5 and 125 GPa.
    Sec. 2.2.2; ignores pressure/temperature dependence of mineral properties and possible additional phases.
  • domain assumption Magma ocean thermal evolution follows the Schaefer et al. (2016) formulation with Tsurf = Tp, a grey atmosphere with constant emissivity, and the piecewise linear solidus of Eq. 13.
    Sec. 2.3 and 2.4; these parameterizations are simplified and may not hold at GJ 486b's deep mantle pressures up to 390 GPa.
  • domain assumption Atmosphere is zero-dimensional and well-mixed, with water as the only volatile; photolysis products are uniformly distributed.
    Sec. 2.5.1; neglects atmospheric structure, ocean condensation, surface reservoirs, and volatiles such as CO2.
  • domain assumption XUV-driven escape follows the energy-limited hydrodynamic escape model (Eq. 31) with fixed efficiency, crossover mass formalism, and thermospheric temperature 400 K.
    Sec. 2.5.2; standard but simplified, neglecting stellar activity, magnetic fields, and other escape mechanisms listed as limitations in Sec. 4.2.
  • domain assumption Initial stellar age is 5 Myr and XUV evolution follows Luger & Barnes (2015) with tsat sampled from Birky et al. (2021).
    Sec. 2.3.1; GJ 486's actual age and XUV history are not well known, and these choices directly affect atmospheric escape rates.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Unveiling the Interior Structure and Thermal Evolution of Super-Earth GJ 486b." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GSCJOXCI

@misc{pith2026250109963,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Unveiling the Interior Structure and Thermal Evolution of Super-Earth GJ 486b},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GSCJOXCI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.09963}
}
read the original abstract

Recent ground- and space-based surveys have shown that planets between Earth and Neptune in size, known as "super-Earths," are among the most frequently found planets in the Galaxy. Although the JWST era has provided high-quality atmospheric data on several such super-Earths, modeling tools are crucial for understanding their unobservable interiors. Consequently, interior studies represent the next essential step in gaining a comprehensive understanding of this class of exoplanets. This study investigates the interior structure, thermal evolution, and atmospheric dynamics of the super-Earth GJ 486b using SERPINT, a 1-D self-consistent coupled interior structure and evolution model, aiming to understand the planet's thermal evolution based on an Earth-like structure. Our results indicate that GJ 486b's core is approximately 1.34 times larger than Earth's, with a core pressure of about 1171 GPa. The thermal evolution model predicts that the planet's mantle cools and solidifies over approximately 0.93 million years. As the magma ocean cools, water is released from the melt, forming a water-rich atmosphere during early solidification. Photolysis of water vapor and subsequent hydrogen escape lead to oxygen accumulation, forming a water- and oxygen-rich secondary atmosphere. Future high-sensitivity JWST observations, with improved wavelength coverage and the detection of additional trace gases, will enable a detailed analysis of the planet's atmospheric composition, providing crucial insights into the interior, surface, and subsurface properties of GJ 486b.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.09963 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flowchart of SERPINT illustrating the four different modules of the model: structure, thermal, volatile, and escape (arranged from left to right), along with the interactions among them. dP dr = − Gρm r 2 (4) We solve these equations using different EOSs for dif￾ferent layers of the interior, which are described in detail in section 2.2. 2.2. Interior composition Works by Pekmezci et al. (2020); Spaargaren et al. (2… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Evolution of radiogenic heating power per unit mass for the radionuclides 238U, 238U, 238Th and 40K (the heating power of 238U have been factored by 10.) ture Tp as T (r) = Tp  1 + αgs Cp (Rp − r)  (12) where α is the thermal expansion coefficient, gs is the planetary surface gravity, Rp is the radius of the planet and Cp is the specific heat capacity of the magma ocean. To parameterize the solidification, we use … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Solidus and liquidus profiles used in SERPINT as follows (Lebrun et al. 2013) η =    2.4 × 10−4 exp  4600 Tp − 1000  ϕ − ϕc 1 − ϕc 2.5 ϕ > ϕc 3.8 × 109 exp  3.5 × 105 RTp  ϕ ≤ ϕc (18) Below ϕc, the viscosity behaves like a solid, leading the planet to undergo solid-state evolution. 2.4. Modeling the atmosphere SERPINT utilizes a grey atmosphere framework in￾spired by Elkins-Tanton (2008)… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of the interior structure of GJ 486b (green) with the PREM (red dashed) and Earth (blue). The plots show variations in density, gravity, and pressure, arranged from left to right. The bluish and brownish background colors denote the core and the mantle of GJ…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Evolution of thermal properties of GJ 486b. The two plots at the top denote the stellar luminosity evolution (bolometric and XUV) and the mantle potential temperature evolution for GJ 486b. The yellow and orange background denote the time evolution before and after the…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Evolution of volatiles in different reservoirs of GJ 486b. The plot on the left illustrates the water distribution among different reservoirs. The middle plot shows the pressure buildup of water and oxygen in the atmosphere. The plot on the right shows the mass of esca…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Evolution of thermal properties of GJ 486b with 0.2 EO, 1 EO, 3 EO, 10 EO and 20 EO of initial water. The plots in the left column represent the mantle potential temperature evolution, while the plots in the right column illustrate the evolution of solidification radiu…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

148 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    1997, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 100, 27

    Abe, Y. 1997, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 100, 27

    1997

  2. [2]

    2005, Astronomische Nachrichten: Astronomical Notes, 326, 913

    Adams, F., Bodenheimer, P., & Laughlin, G. 2005, Astronomische Nachrichten: Astronomical Notes, 326, 913

    2005

  3. [3]

    Anderson, D. L. 1995, Reviews of Geophysics, 33, 125

    1995

  4. [4]

    W., & Ahrens, T

    Anderson, W. W., & Ahrens, T. J. 1994, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 99, 4273

    1994

  5. [5]

    L., et al

    Andrault, D., Bolfan-Casanova, N., Nigro, G. L., et al. 2011, Earth and planetary science letters, 304, 251

    2011

  6. [6]

    1998, arXiv preprint astro-ph/9805009

    Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., & Hauschildt, P. 1998, arXiv preprint astro-ph/9805009

    arXiv 1998

  7. [7]

    2015, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 577, A42

    Baraffe, I., Homeier, D., Allard, F., & Chabrier, G. 2015, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 577, A42

    2015

  8. [8]

    2020, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 132, 024502

    Barnes, R., Luger, R., Deitrick, R., et al. 2020, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 132, 024502

    2020

Show all 148 references
  1. [9]

    2021, Astrobiology, 21, 1325

    Barth, P., Carone, L., Barnes, R., et al. 2021, Astrobiology, 21, 1325

    2021

  2. [10]

    M., Borucki, W

    Batalha, N. M., Borucki, W. J., Bryson, S. T., et al. 2011, The Astrophysical Journal, 729, 27

    2011

  3. [11]

    J., Ahrer, E.-M., Brande, J., et al

    Bell, T. J., Ahrer, E.-M., Brande, J., et al. 2022, arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.03585

    2022 arXiv

  4. [12]

    2019, The Astronomical Journal, 158, 246

    Berdyugina, S., & Kuhn, J. 2019, The Astronomical Journal, 158, 246

    2019

  5. [13]

    1964, Journal of geophysical research, 69, 4377 —

    Birch, F. 1964, Journal of geophysical research, 69, 4377 —. 1988, Elastic Properties and Equations of State, 26, 31

    1964

  6. [14]

    Birky, J., Barnes, R., & Fleming, D. P. 2021, Research Notes of the AAS, 5, 122

    2021

  7. [15]

    J., Hakim, K., Sossi, P

    Bower, D. J., Hakim, K., Sossi, P. A., & Sanan, P. 2022, The planetary science journal, 3, 93

    2022

  8. [16]

    1984, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 48, 1183

    Brett, R. 1984, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 48, 1183

    1984

  9. [17]

    2022, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 665, A120

    Caballero, J., Gonz´ alez-´Alvarez, E., Brady, M., et al. 2022, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 665, A120

    2022

  10. [18]

    Canup, R. M. 2004, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 42, 441

    2004

  11. [19]

    1998, Icarus, 136, 304 Chassefi` ere, E

    Chambers, J., & Wetherill, G. 1998, Icarus, 136, 304 Chassefi` ere, E. 1996, Icarus, 124, 537

    1998

  12. [20]

    Condie, K. C. 2013, Plate tectonics & crustal evolution (Elsevier)

    2013

  13. [21]

    2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 860, 122

    Crida, A., Ligi, R., Dorn, C., & Lebreton, Y. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 860, 122

    2018

  14. [22]

    H., & Davies, D

    Davies, J. H., & Davies, D. R. 2010, Solid earth, 1, 5 de Wit, J., Wakeford, H. R., Gillon, M., et al. 2016, Nature, 537, 69

    2010

  15. [23]

    2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 455, 2018

    Demory, B.-O., Gillon, M., Madhusudhan, N., & Queloz, D. 2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 455, 2018

    2016

  16. [24]

    Diamond-Lowe, H., Berta-Thompson, Z., Charbonneau, D., & Kempton, E. M.-R. 2018, The Astronomical Journal, 156, 42

    2018

  17. [25]

    J., & Rozel, A

    Dorn, C., Bower, D. J., & Rozel, A. 2018, Assessing the Interior Structure of Terrestrial Exoplanets with Implications for Habitability (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 3111–3135, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-55333-7 66

    2018 doi

  18. [26]

    H., Bonsor, A., & Hands, T

    Dorn, C., Harrison, J. H., Bonsor, A., & Hands, T. O. 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 484, 712

    2019

  19. [27]

    2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 922, L4

    Dorn, C., & Lichtenberg, T. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 922, L4

    2021

  20. [28]

    2017, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 597, A37

    Dorn, C., Venturini, J., Khan, A., et al. 2017, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 597, A37

    2017

  21. [29]

    2014, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 125, 582

    Duan, X. 2014, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 125, 582

    2014

  22. [30]

    M., & Anderson, D

    Dziewonski, A. M., & Anderson, D. L. 1981, Physics of the earth and planetary interiors, 25, 297

    1981

  23. [31]

    Elkins-Tanton, L. T. 2008, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 271, 181

    2008

  24. [32]

    T., & Seager, S

    Elkins-Tanton, L. T., & Seager, S. 2008, The Astrophysical Journal, 685, 1237

    2008

  25. [33]

    T., Townsend, J

    Fei, Y., Seagle, C. T., Townsend, J. P., et al. 2021, Nature Communications, 12, 876

    2021

  26. [34]

    2004, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 109

    Fei, Y., Van Orman, J., Li, J., et al. 2004, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 109

    2004

  27. [35]

    Foley, B. J. 2024, Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 90, 559

    2024

  28. [36]

    J., Bercovici, D., & Elkins-Tanton, L

    Foley, B. J., Bercovici, D., & Elkins-Tanton, L. T. 2014, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 119, 8538

    2014

  29. [37]

    J., Bercovici, D., & Landuyt, W

    Foley, B. J., Bercovici, D., & Landuyt, W. 2012, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 331, 281

    2012

  30. [38]

    J., Houser, C., Noack, L., & Tosi, N

    Foley, B. J., Houser, C., Noack, L., & Tosi, N. 2020, in Planetary Diversity: Rocky planet processes and their observational signatures (IOP Publishing Bristol, UK), 4–1

    2020

  31. [39]

    Buchanan, P. C. 2005, Nature, 435, 916

    2005

  32. [40]

    L., Demory, B.-O., Gillon, M., et al

    Grimm, S. L., Demory, B.-O., Gillon, M., et al. 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 613, A68

    2018

  33. [41]

    2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 872, 99

    Guo, J. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 872, 99

    2019

  34. [42]

    2018, Icarus, 313, 61

    Hakim, K., Rivoldini, A., Van Hoolst, T., et al. 2018, Icarus, 313, 61

    2018

  35. [43]

    2013, Nature, 497, 607

    Hamano, K., Abe, Y., & Genda, H. 2013, Nature, 497, 607

    2013

  36. [44]

    M., Moschou, S

    Harbach, L. M., Moschou, S. P., Garraffo, C., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 913, 130

    2021

  37. [45]

    J., Cawood, P

    Hawkesworth, C. J., Cawood, P. A., & Dhuime, B. 2016, GSA today —. 2020, Frontiers in earth science, 8, 326

    2016

  38. [46]

    2019, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 47, 583 22

    Helling, C. 2019, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 47, 583 22

    2019

  39. [47]

    J., Stixrude, L., Fei, Y., & Mao, H

    Hemley, R. J., Stixrude, L., Fei, Y., & Mao, H. K. 2013, Constraints on Lower Mantle Composition fromP-V-TMeasurements of (Fe, Mg)SiO3-Perovskite and (Fe, Mg)O (American Geophysical Union), 183–189, doi: 10.1029/gm067p0183

    2013 doi

  40. [48]

    J., Jao, W.-C., Subasavage, J

    Henry, T. J., Jao, W.-C., Subasavage, J. P., et al. 2006, The Astronomical Journal, 132, 2360

    2006

  41. [49]

    J., Jao, W.-C., Winters, J

    Henry, T. J., Jao, W.-C., Winters, J. G., et al. 2018, The Astronomical Journal, 155, 265

    2018

  42. [50]

    R., Youngblood, A., & Soares-Furtado, M

    Hinkel, N. R., Youngblood, A., & Soares-Furtado, M. 2024, Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 90, 1

    2024

  43. [51]

    2006, Reviews of Geophysics, 44

    Hirose, K. 2006, Reviews of Geophysics, 44

    2006

  44. [52]

    Hirschmann, M. M. 2000, Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 1

    2000

  45. [53]

    M., Tenner, T., Aubaud, C., & Withers, A

    Hirschmann, M. M., Tenner, T., Aubaud, C., & Withers, A. 2009, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 176, 54

    2009

  46. [54]

    1996, Reports on Progress in Physics, 59, 29

    Holzapfel, W. 1996, Reports on Progress in Physics, 59, 29

    1996

  47. [55]

    Holzapfel, W. B. 1998, International Journal of High Pressure Research, 16, 81

    1998

  48. [56]

    Hosono, N., Karato, S.-i., Makino, J., & Saitoh, T. R. 2019, Nature Geoscience, 12, 418

    2019

  49. [57]

    2024, Nature, 1

    Hu, R., Bello-Arufe, A., Zhang, M., et al. 2024, Nature, 1

    2024

  50. [58]

    R., & Steffen, J

    Huang, C., Rice, D. R., & Steffen, J. H. 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 513, 5256

    2022

  51. [59]

    Hunten, D. M. 1973, Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 30, 1481

    1973

  52. [60]

    M., Pepin, R

    Hunten, D. M., Pepin, R. O., & Walker, J. C. 1987, Icarus, 69, 532

    1987

  53. [61]

    Johnson, R. E. 2010, The Astrophysical Journal, 716, 1573

    2010

  54. [62]

    1954, Australian Journal of Physics, 7, 322

    Keane, A. 1954, Australian Journal of Physics, 7, 322

    1954

  55. [63]

    2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 897, 161

    Kegerreis, J., Eke, V., Massey, R., & Teodoro, L. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 897, 161

    2020

  56. [64]

    2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 1296

    Kimura, T., & Ikoma, M. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 1296

    2022

  57. [65]

    J., et al

    Kirk, J., L´ opez-Morales, M., Wheatley, P. J., et al. 2019, The Astronomical Journal, 158, 144

    2019

  58. [66]

    J., Louden, T., et al

    Kirk, J., Wheatley, P. J., Louden, T., et al. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 474, 876

    2018

  59. [67]

    V., MacDonald, R

    Kirk, J., Rackham, B. V., MacDonald, R. J., et al. 2021, The Astronomical Journal, 162, 34

    2021

  60. [68]

    S., & Barnett, M

    Kite, E. S., & Barnett, M. N. 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117, 18264

    2020

  61. [69]

    S., Fegley Jr, B., Schaefer, L., & Gaidos, E

    Kite, E. S., Fegley Jr, B., Schaefer, L., & Gaidos, E. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 828, 80

    2016

  62. [70]

    T., Lavvas, P., Harris, M

    Koskinen, T. T., Lavvas, P., Harris, M. J., & Yelle, R. V. 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A:

    2014

  63. [71]

    G., Hemley, R

    Kraus, R. G., Hemley, R. J., Ali, S. J., et al. 2022, Science, 375, 202

    2022

  64. [72]

    Krissansen-Totton, J., & Fortney, J. J. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 933, 115

    2022

  65. [73]

    J., Nimmo, F., & Wogan, N

    Krissansen-Totton, J., Fortney, J. J., Nimmo, F., & Wogan, N. 2021, AGU Advances, 2, e2020A V000294

    2021

  66. [74]

    2013, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 118, 1155

    Lebrun, T., Massol, H., Chassefi` ere, E., et al. 2013, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 118, 1155

    2013

  67. [75]

    Li, Y., Voˇ cadlo, L., Sun, T., & Brodholt, J. P. 2020, Nature Geoscience, 13, 453

    2020

  68. [76]

    B., & Shorttle, O

    Liggins, P., Jordan, S., Rimmer, P. B., & Shorttle, O. 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 127, e2021JE007123

    2022

  69. [77]

    D., & Shatskiy, A

    Litasov, K. D., & Shatskiy, A. 2016, Russian Geology and Geophysics, 57, 22

    2016

  70. [78]

    D., & Fortney, J

    Lopez, E. D., & Fortney, J. J. 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 792, 1 Lorenzo Jr, A. M. 2018, ExoPlex: A New Python Library For Detailed Modeling Of Rocky Exoplanet Internal Structure And Mineralogy (Arizona State University) Louren¸ co, D. L., & Rozel, A. B. 2023, in Dynamic...

    2014

  71. [79]

    2015, Astrobiology, 15, 119

    Luger, R., & Barnes, R. 2015, Astrobiology, 15, 119

    2015

  72. [80]

    2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 0129

    Luger, R., Sestovic, M., Kruse, E., et al. 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 0129

    2017

  73. [81]

    MacDonald, R. J. 2023, Journal of Open Source Software, 8, 4873

    2023

  74. [82]

    J., & Madhusudhan, N

    MacDonald, R. J., & Madhusudhan, N. 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 469, 1979

    2017

  75. [83]

    2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 758, 36

    Madhusudhan, N. 2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 758, 36

    2012

  76. [84]

    2012, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 313, 56

    Marty, B. 2012, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 313, 56

    2012

  77. [85]

    J., Bennett, K

    May, E., MacDonald, R. J., Bennett, K. A., et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 959, L9

    2023

  78. [86]

    G., Bower, D

    Meier, T. G., Bower, D. J., Lichtenberg, T., Tackley, P. J., & Demory, B.-O. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 908, L48

    2021

  79. [87]

    G., Bower, D

    Meier, T. G., Bower, D. J., Lichtenberg, T., et al. 2024, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 129, e2024JE008491

    2024

  80. [88]

    Miller, N., & Fortney, J. J. 2011, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 736, L29

    2011

  81. [89]

    E., Stevenson, K

    Moran, S. E., Stevenson, K. B., Sing, D. K., et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 948, L11

    2023

  82. [90]

    I., et al

    Morbidelli, A., Chambers, J., Lunine, J. I., et al. 2000, Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 35, 1309

    2000

  83. [91]

    I., O’Brien, D

    Morbidelli, A., Lunine, J. I., O’Brien, D. P., Raymond, S. N., & Walsh, K. J. 2012, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 40, 251

    2012

  84. [92]

    L., Asimow, P

    Mosenfelder, J. L., Asimow, P. D., Frost, D. J., Rubie, D. C., & Ahrens, T. J. 2009, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 114 23

    2009

  85. [93]

    Mousis, O., Ronnet, T., & Lunine, J. I. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 875, 9 Mu˜ noz, A. G. 2023, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 672, A77

    2019

  86. [94]

    2004, Science, 304, 855

    Ohishi, Y. 2004, Science, 304, 855

    2004

  87. [95]

    Nakajima, M., & Stevenson, D. J. 2015, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 427, 286

    2015

  88. [96]

    2021, in ExoFrontiers: Big questions in exoplanetary science (IOP Publishing

    Nettelmann, N., & Valencia, D. 2021, in ExoFrontiers: Big questions in exoplanetary science (IOP Publishing

    2021

  89. [97]

    Neveu, M., & Desch, S. J. 2015, Geophysical Research Letters, 42, 10

    2015

  90. [98]

    Nuth, J. A. 2008, Advances in Meteoroid and Meteor Science, 435 O’Connell, R. J. 1977, Tectonophysics, 38, 119 O’neill, C., & Lenardic, A. 2007, Geophysical Research Letters, 34

    2008

  91. [99]

    2020, Scientific reports, 10, 10907

    Ortenzi, G., Noack, L., Sohl, F., et al. 2020, Scientific reports, 10, 10907

    2020

  92. [100]

    Owen, J. E. 2019, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 47, 67

    2019

  93. [101]

    1999, American Mineralogist, 84, 477

    Papale, P. 1999, American Mineralogist, 84, 477

    1999

  94. [102]

    M., Jim´ enez-D ´ ıaz, A., Mansilla, F., & Ruiz, J

    Parro, L. M., Jim´ enez-D ´ ıaz, A., Mansilla, F., & Ruiz, J. 2017, Scientific reports, 7, 45629

    2017

  95. [103]

    S., Mousis, O., & Lunine, J

    Pekmezci, G. S., Mousis, O., & Lunine, J. I. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 904, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abbd90

    2020 doi

  96. [104]

    1996, Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 68, 25–36, doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a031847

    Plant, J., & Saunders, A. 1996, Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 68, 25–36, doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a031847

    1996 doi

  97. [105]

    1994, Physics of the earth and planetary interiors, 85, 319 Ribas, ´A., Mer ´ ın, B., Bouy, H., & Maud, L

    Poirier, J.-P. 1994, Physics of the earth and planetary interiors, 85, 319 Ribas, ´A., Mer ´ ın, B., Bouy, H., & Maud, L. T. 2014, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 561, A54

    1994

  98. [106]

    K., Flagg, L., et al

    Ridden-Harper, A., Nugroho, S. K., Flagg, L., et al. 2023, The Astronomical Journal, 165, 170

    2023

  99. [107]

    2003, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 31, 135 Rodr ´ ıguez-Mozos, J., & Moya, A

    Righter, K. 2003, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 31, 135 Rodr ´ ıguez-Mozos, J., & Moya, A. 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 630, A52

    2003

  100. [108]

    C., Frost, D

    Rubie, D. C., Frost, D. J., Mann, U., et al. 2011, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 301, 31

    2011

  101. [109]

    2017, Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 18, 3530

    Ruedas, T. 2017, Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 18, 3530

    2017

  102. [110]

    K., Liu, R., & Wang, A

    Rustamkulov, Z., Sing, D. K., Liu, R., & Wang, A. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 928, L7

    2022

  103. [111]

    2023, Nature, 614, 659

    Rustamkulov, Z., Sing, D., Mukherjee, S., et al. 2023, Nature, 614, 659

    2023

  104. [112]

    2016, Scientific Reports, 6, 22652

    Sakai, T., Dekura, H., & Hirao, N. 2016, Scientific Reports, 6, 22652

    2016

  105. [113]

    2023, Space Science Reviews, 219, 51

    Salvador, A., Avice, G., Breuer, D., et al. 2023, Space Science Reviews, 219, 51

    2023

  106. [114]

    Schaefer, L., & Elkins-Tanton, L. T. 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376, 20180109

    2018

  107. [115]

    2009, The Astrophysical Journal, 703, L113

    Schaefer, L., & Fegley, B. 2009, The Astrophysical Journal, 703, L113

    2009

  108. [116]

    2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 755, 41

    Schaefer, L., Lodders, K., & Fegley, B. 2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 755, 41

    2012

  109. [117]

    2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 829, 63

    Sasselov, D. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 829, 63

    2016

  110. [118]

    2007, The Astrophysical Journal, 669, 1279

    Seager, S., Kuchner, M., Hier-Majumder, C., & Militzer, B. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal, 669, 1279

    2007

  111. [119]

    L., Ballard, S., & Johnson, J

    Shields, A. L., Ballard, S., & Johnson, J. A. 2016, Physics Reports, 663, 1

    2016

  112. [120]

    H., Zahnle, K

    Sleep, N. H., Zahnle, K. J., & Lupu, R. E. 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A:

    2014

  113. [121]

    F., Fratanduono, D

    Smith, R. F., Fratanduono, D. E., Braun, D. G., et al. 2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 452

    2018

  114. [122]

    J., Wang, H

    Spaargaren, R. J., Wang, H. S., Mojzsis, S. J., Ballmer, M. D., & Tackley, P. J. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 948, 53

    2023

  115. [123]

    2005, Science, 310, 297

    Stixrude, L., & Karki, B. 2005, Science, 310, 297

    2005

  116. [124]

    2023, Frontiers in Earth Science, 11, 1159412

    Lichtenberg, T. 2023, Frontiers in Earth Science, 11, 1159412

    2023

  117. [125]

    F., & Black, J

    Tabone, B., van Dishoeck, E. F., & Black, J. H. 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.14560

    2024 arXiv

  118. [126]

    Tackley, P. J. 2023, in Dynamics of Plate Tectonics and Mantle Convection (Elsevier), 159–180

    2023

  119. [127]

    J., Ammann, M., Brodholt, J

    Tackley, P. J., Ammann, M., Brodholt, J. P., Dobson, D. P., & Valencia, D. 2013, Icarus, 225, 50

    2013

  120. [128]

    J., Unterborn, C., Laneuville, M., et al

    Tasker, E. J., Unterborn, C., Laneuville, M., et al. 2020, Planetary Diversity: Rocky planet processes and their observational signatures (IOP Publishing)

    2020

  121. [129]

    2009, The Astrophysical Journal, 703, 905

    Tian, F. 2009, The Astrophysical Journal, 703, 905

    2009

  122. [130]

    C., et al

    Trifonov, T., Caballero, J., Morales, J. C., et al. 2021, Science, 371, 1038

    2021

  123. [131]

    1998, Physics of Fluids, 10, 351 Trønnes, R

    Trompert, R., & Hansen, U. 1998, Physics of Fluids, 10, 351 Trønnes, R. G., Baron, M. A., Eigenmann, K. R., et al. 2019, Tectonophysics, 760, 165

    1998

  124. [132]

    2020, Space science reviews, 216, 1

    Turbet, M., Bolmont, E., Bourrier, V., et al. 2020, Space science reviews, 216, 1

    2020

  125. [133]

    2015, Experimental Astronomy, 40, 501

    Turrini, D., Nelson, R., & Barbieri, M. 2015, Experimental Astronomy, 40, 501

    2015

  126. [134]

    T., Dismukes, E

    Unterborn, C. T., Dismukes, E. E., & Panero, W. R. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 819, 32 24

    2016

  127. [135]

    T., & Panero, W

    Unterborn, C. T., & Panero, W. R. 2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 124, 1704–1716, doi: 10.1029/2018je005844

    2019 doi

  128. [136]

    J., & Sasselov, D

    Valencia, D., O’Connell, R. J., & Sasselov, D. 2006, Icarus, 181, 545

    2006

  129. [137]

    D., & O’Connell, R

    Valencia, D., Sasselov, D. D., & O’Connell, R. J. 2007b, The Astrophysical Journal, 656, 545 Van Hoolst, T., Noack, L., & Rivoldini, A. 2019, Advances in Physics: X, 4, 1630316, doi: 10.1080/23746149.2019.1630316 Van Summeren, J., Conrad, C. P., & Gaidos, E. 2011, The Astrophy...

    2019

  130. [138]

    1986, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics, 19, L467

    Vinet, P., Ferrante, J., Smith, J., & Rose, J. 1986, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics, 19, L467

    1986

  131. [139]

    H., Ferrante, J., & Smith, J

    Vinet, P., Rose, J. H., Ferrante, J., & Smith, J. R. 1989, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 1, 1941

    1989

  132. [140]

    2011, Icarus, 214, 366

    Rauer, H. 2011, Icarus, 214, 366

    2011

  133. [141]

    2022, ARA&A, 60, 159, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-125632

    Wordsworth, R., & Kreidberg, L. 2022, ARA&A, 60, 159, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-125632

    2022 doi

  134. [142]

    Yoder, C. F. 1995, Global Earth Physics: A Handbook of Physical Constants, 1, 1

    1995

  135. [143]

    F., & Pollack, J

    Zahnle, K., Kasting, J. F., & Pollack, J. B. 1990, Icarus, 84, 502

    1990

  136. [144]

    Zahnle, K. J. 1986, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 91, 2819

    1986

  137. [145]

    Zhang, J., & Rogers, L. A. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 938, 131

    2022

  138. [146]

    2023, Nature, 620, 746

    Zieba, S., Kreidberg, L., Ducrot, E., et al. 2023, Nature, 620, 746

    2023

  139. [147]

    2022, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 661, A126

    Zilinskas, M., Van Buchem, C., Miguel, Y., et al. 2022, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 661, A126

    2022

  140. [148]

    Zolotov, M. Y. 2009, Icarus, 204, 183 —. 2020, Icarus, 335, 113404

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.