Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Application of the Cyberinfrastructure Production Function Model to R1 Institutions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.10264 v3 pith:LO4EVZYW submitted 2025-01-17 cs.CY

classification cs.CY
keywords modelproductionfunctioncomputinginvestmentinstitutionalinstitutionsresearch
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

High-performance computing (HPC) is widely used in higher education for modeling, simulation, and AI applications. A critical piece of infrastructure with which to secure funding, attract and retain faculty, and teach students, supercomputers come with high capital and operating costs that must be considered against other competing priorities. This study applies the concepts of the production function model from economics with two thrusts: 1) to evaluate if previous research on building a model for quantifying the value of investment in research computing is generalizable to a wider set of universities, and 2) to define a model with which to capacity plan HPC investment, based on institutional production - inverting the production function. We show that the production function model does appear to generalize, showing positive institutional returns from the investment in computing resources and staff. We do, however, find that the relative relationships between model inputs and outputs vary across institutions, which can often be attributed to understandable institution-specific factors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantitative analysis of the value of investment in research facilities, with examples from cyberinfrastructure

    econ.GN 2025-02 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    The paper reviews quantitative methods for valuing research facilities, drawing on cyberinfrastructure studies, and argues that such analyses support a positive return on public investment.

Pith tools