Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 41 references

The $q$-Racah polynomials from scalar products of Bethe states II

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Scalar products of Bethe states are q-Racah polynomials in disguise.

desk verdict Solid extension of the Leonard-pair/Bethe-ansatz correspondence, but the headline determinant formula for q-Racah polynomials rests on an existence theorem that is proven only for s=1/2. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.10310 v2 pith:EYLP5CLG submitted 2025-01-17 math-ph math.MPmath.QAmath.RT

Pascal Baseilhac , Rodrigo A. Pimenta This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.MPmath.QAmath.RT MSC 33D4581R5081U15
keywords Askey-WilsonalgebraLeonardpairstriplesq-RacahpolynomialsBetheansatzscalarproductsBelliard-Slavnovsysteminhomogeneousequations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to show that scalar products of on-shell and off-shell Bethe states generated from a Leonard pair of q-Racah type are themselves q-Racah polynomials, not merely quantities that happen to satisfy the same equations. Using the third operator of a Leonard triple, the authors derive explicit formulas in which each normalized scalar product is a finite linear combination of q-Racah polynomials, with coefficients fixed by the off-shell parameters. Specializing to $M''=2s$ places the same scalar products inside the Belliard-Slavnov system of linear equations, and Cramer's rule then produces a determinant formula for the q-Racah polynomials whose entries are inhomogeneous Bethe roots. The paper also derives a dictionary between inhomogeneous and homogeneous Bethe roots. These results matter because they connect the representation theory of the Askey-Wilson algebra to the algebraic Bethe ansatz and give a new, determinant-based presentation of a standard family of orthogonal polynomials.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Leonard triple $(A,A^*,A^\diamond)$ of q-Racah type: three diagonalizable operators on a $(2s+1)$-dimensional space, each tridiagonal in the eigenbasis of the others, with $A^\diamond$ built from the $q$-commutator of $A$ and $A^*$. At $\beta=0$ the dynamical operator $B^\epsilon(u,m)$ factors as a product of linear factors $(U_i-r_0(q+q^{-1})^{-1}A^\diamond)$, so any scalar product of a Bethe state with an eigenvector of $A$ becomes a matrix element of a polynomial in $A^\diamond$ between eigenbases of $A$ and $A^*$; those transition matrices are exactly q-Racah polynomials written as balanced $4\varphi_3$ series. The second mechanism is the Belliard-Slavnov system: the action of $A$ on the $2s$-variable Bethe states is tridiagonal with explicit coefficients $L^\epsilon_{jk}$, hence the normalized scalar products solve the homogeneous linear system $(L^\epsilon-\theta_M I)X=0$, whose rank is $2s$. Cramer's rule, applied after a left multiplication by the matrix $W^{\epsilon,M}$ satisfying conditions (i)-(ii), turns these solutions into ratios of determinants.

What would settle it

Work out the defining equations for $W^{\epsilon,M}$ symbolically for $s=1$ and $s=3/2$: impose (i) the vanishing of the last row of $W^{\epsilon,M}M^{\epsilon,M}$ and (ii) independence of the minors from the deleted variable $y_k$, and check whether an invertible solution exists. If the system is inconsistent for any $M$ or $\epsilon$, Proposition 4.2 and Corollary 4.1 collapse; if a solution exists, one can then evaluate both sides of (4.14) at generic parameters and compare the determinant ratio with the closed $4\varphi_3$ form of the q-Racah polynomial to settle the claim directly.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central result, Theorem 1 (Eqs. (3.49)-(3.50)), is that for $eta=0$ the normalized scalar products satisfy $$ \frac{\langle\theta_M|\$Psi^{{M''}}$_-(\bar u,m)\rangle}{\langle\theta_M|\theta_M\rangle} = $G^{{M''}}$_-(\bar u)\frac{f_M}{f_0}\sum_{M'=0}^{2s}($P^{{\{\diamond,.\}}$-1})_{M M'} \prod_{i=1}^{M''}\left(U_i-\frac{r_0}{q+$q^{{-1}}$}\$theta^{{\diamond}}$_{M'}\right), $$ with an analogous displayed formula for the $+$ case, where $U_i=(q u_i^2+q^{-1}u_i^{-2})/(q+q^{-1})$ and every prefactor is explicit Leonard-triple data. The proof decomposes the off-shell Bethe state in the eigenbasis of $A^\diamond$; the matrix elements that survive are the transition coefficients, which are q-Racah polynomials. For $M''=2s$ these scalar products solve the Belliard-Slavnov linear system (4.8), and Proposition 4.2 rewrites the solution as the determinant formula (4.11). After the last variable is specialized to the inhomogeneous Bethe-root set $S^{*N(i)}_-$, the q-Racah ratio identity (3.64) turns this into Corollary 4.1: the q-Racah polynomial $R^{\{.,\diamond\}}_M(\theta^*_N)$ is a ratio of determinants labelled by inhomogeneous Bethe roots. Proposition 3.4 completes the picture with rational relations expressing those inhomogeneous Bethe roots in terms of homogeneous Bethe roots for the same eigenvalue $\theta^*_N$.

Load-bearing premise

The determinant formula for the q-Racah polynomials rests on the assumption that for every spin $s$ there is an invertible matrix $W^{\epsilon,M}$ that satisfies the two technical conditions in Proposition 4.2; the paper constructs such a matrix only for $s=1/2$ and states the general case without proof, so if it fails for some higher $s$ the determinant formula does not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Theorem 1 reduces every normalized on-shell/off-shell scalar product with $\beta=0$ to a finite sum of q-Racah polynomials, so the off-shell parameters enter only as coefficients of a known basis.
  • Theorem 2 places the $M''=2s$ scalar products in the Belliard-Slavnov framework, showing they are the solutions of a rank-$2s$ homogeneous linear system rather than isolated formulas.
  • Corollary 4.1 supplies a new presentation of the q-Racah polynomials as ratios of determinants built from inhomogeneous Bethe roots, an alternative to the balanced $4\varphi_3$ series.
  • Proposition 3.4 gives explicit relations that determine inhomogeneous Bethe roots from homogeneous Bethe roots for each eigenvalue $\theta^*_N$, verified numerically for $s=1/2,1,3/2$.
  • For the three-site Hamiltonian $H(\lambda)=A+\lambda A^*$, the scalar products of Theorem 1 are the overlaps between eigenstates of $H(\lambda)$ and $H(0)$, giving the ground-state fidelity across the transition described in Remark 7.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the matrix $W^{\epsilon,M}$ exists for all $s$ as assumed, the same Leonard-triple mechanism should produce determinant formulas for the Racah polynomials and the other Askey-scheme limits; the paper only states the q-Racah case, so this is an extrapolation.
  • The relations (3.66) give a practical label for inhomogeneous Bethe roots: instead of an integer quantum number, the solution set is indexed by the eigenvalue $\theta^*_N$ through the associated homogeneous Bethe roots; the paper notes the missing classification but does not formulate it as a theorem.
  • Because at $\beta=0$ the dynamical operators factor through $A^\diamond$, any integrable model whose exchange relations are of the same universal form should inherit these scalar-product identities; the open XXZ chain with special boundaries is the natural next testing ground, though the paper only lists it as a perspective.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops the Leonard pair/algebraic Bethe ansatz correspondence for scalar products. Starting from a Leonard triple of q-Racah type, the authors derive explicit formulas (Theorem 1, Eqs. (3.49)-(3.50)) for normalized scalar products of on-shell eigenvectors of A with off-shell Bethe states, expressed as linear combinations of q-Racah polynomials. They then specialize these results to relate homogeneous and inhomogeneous Bethe roots (Proposition 3.4, Eq. (3.66)), subject to two hypotheses. In Section 4, the same scalar products are shown to solve a Belliard-Slavnov linear system (Proposition 4.1, Eq. (4.8)), and a determinant representation is claimed (Proposition 4.2, Eq. (4.11)), leading to a determinant formula for q-Racah polynomials (Corollary 4.1, Eq. (4.14)). The proof of the determinant formula relies on an asserted matrix W^{ε,M} whose existence is verified explicitly only for s=1/2; for s=1 and 3/2 the numerical checks verify that Theorem 1 solves the linear system, not the determinant formula.

Significance. If the central claims are fully established, the paper would provide a new bridge between the algebraic Bethe ansatz and the theory of Leonard triples, yielding explicit scalar-product formulas and a determinant representation of q-Racah polynomials in terms of inhomogeneous Bethe roots. The derivation of Theorem 1 is clear and self-contained, and the s=1/2 examples are worked out in detail, including a matching with known q-Racah values. The paper also offers a potentially useful practical method for computing overlap functions in small integrable models. However, the headline determinant formula for general s rests on an unproven existence statement for the matrix W, and the relation between homogeneous and inhomogeneous Bethe roots rests on two explicitly unproven hypotheses. These gaps currently limit the paper's scope to a conditional result.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4.2, Proposition 4.2 and Corollary 4.1] The determinant formula (4.11) and thus Corollary 4.1 (4.14) depend on the existence of a non-degenerate matrix W^{ε,M} satisfying conditions (i) and (ii). This existence is proven by explicit construction only for s=1/2 in §4.3. For s=1 and 3/2, the text states that the expressions (3.49) and (3.50) solve the linear system (4.8), which checks Theorem 2; it does not establish that a W satisfying (i) and (ii) exists, nor does it verify the determinant form (4.11). Since Corollary 4.1 is the paper's headline claim, this is a load-bearing gap. A general proof of existence of W, or a construction for all s, is needed before the determinant formula can be accepted.
  2. [§3.3, Proposition 3.4 and Lemmas 3.9-3.10] Proposition 3.4 and the preceding lemmas are stated under Hypothesis 1 and Hypothesis 2, which are explicitly described as unproven (following conjectures from [BaP19]). The paper does not prove these hypotheses, so the relation (3.66) between inhomogeneous and homogeneous Bethe roots is conditional. This should be stated clearly as a conditional result, or the hypotheses should be proved or at least supported by a general argument beyond the numerical checks for s=1, 3/2.
  3. [§4.1, Lemma 4.2] The rank assertion rank(M^{ε,M})=2s is justified by the claim that the vectors |Ψ^{2s}_ε(Ȳ_k,m)>, k=1,...,2s+1, are linearly independent. This linear independence is asserted without proof. If these vectors were linearly dependent, the rank could drop and the Cramer-rule step in Proposition 4.2 would collapse. A proof of linear independence, or an alternative argument for the rank, is required.
  4. [§4.2, proof of Proposition 4.2] The overall factors ψ^ε_M in (4.11) are fixed by comparing with (3.49)-(3.50) in the limit ¯u→∞, but this comparison is only described in words and not carried out. Since the value of ψ^ε_M enters the ratio in Corollary 4.1, the comparison should be shown explicitly, at least for the general structure, to verify that the limit is well-defined and that the normalization is consistent.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§4.1] In the sentence 'For higher values of s = 1, 3/2, using Mathematica it can be independently checked that the expressions (3.49) and (3.50) for M'' = 2s solve the linear system (4.7)', the reference should be to equation (4.8), not (4.7), since (4.7) defines the scalar product X^{ε,off}_M.
  2. [§3.3] The notation ¯U_j is introduced as the set with the j-th element removed, but in equations (3.61) and (3.62) the argument is written as P^N_+(U^{(h)}_j, ¯U^{(h)}_j); it would be clearer to use a different symbol, such as ¯U^{(h)}_{\neq j}, to avoid confusion with the full set.
  3. [Throughout] There are several typographical issues in the text, for example 'off-she ll', 'pol ynomials', and 'ansaz' in the concluding remarks. These should be corrected in a final revision.
  4. [§3.2, Theorem 1] The statement of Theorem 1 uses the notation M'' without explicitly defining it before the theorem; the definition is implicit in the preceding lemmas (M'' denotes the number of B-operators in the string). A brief definition in the theorem statement would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular reduction found: the scalar-product formulas are derived from Leonard-triple transition matrices with q-Racah polynomials defined independently, and the determinant formula is a Cramer-rule representation whose prefactor is fixed by a standard limit normalization.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, Theorem 1, expresses normalized scalar products as linear combinations of q-Racah polynomials. These polynomials are defined independently in (3.30) as 4φ3 series and enter only through the Leonard-pair transition matrices (3.29) from Terwilliger's theory, so the derivation does not define the target in terms of itself. The determinant route is also not circular by construction: Proposition 4.1 obtains the Belliard-Slavnov system (4.8) from the action of A on off-shell Bethe states, independently of Theorem 1, and Theorem 2 then identifies the Theorem 1 scalar products as solutions of that system. Proposition 4.2's determinant formula (4.11) is a Cramer-rule representation whose overall factor ψ is fixed by comparing with Theorem 1 at infinity; this is a normalization calibration, not a fitted prediction, and the determinant structure carries independent content. The main weakness is an omitted proof rather than circularity: Proposition 4.2 assumes a non-degenerate matrix W^{ǫ,M} satisfying conditions (i) and (ii) for all s, but only the case s=1/2 is explicitly constructed in Section 4.3; the Mathematica checks for s=1 and 3/2 verify only that (3.49) and (3.50) solve the linear system (4.8), i.e. Theorem 2, not the existence of W or the determinant formula (4.11). Corollary 4.1 is therefore conditional on that unproven existence, which is a correctness gap, not a circularity. Hypotheses 1 and 2 are explicitly labeled as hypotheses with numerical support rather than imported as external uniqueness theorems, and the self-citations [BaP19, BP22] provide background results that are not identical to the conclusion. Accordingly, no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on standard Leonard pair/triple theory and Askey-Wilson algebra results, plus several unproven hypotheses introduced for this paper: uniqueness of Bethe root solutions (Hypotheses 1 and 2) and the existence of a normalization matrix W for the determinant formula. These are the main sources of uncertainty.

free parameters (1)
  • ψ_M^ǫ (overall normalization in determinant formula) = Not specified in general; fixed for s=1/2 by matching known expressions
    In Proposition 4.2 the determinant formula (4.11) leaves ψ_M^ǫ as an undetermined function. In Section 4.3 the authors compute it for s=1/2 by comparing the determinant to the known scalar product expressions (3.52-3.56). This is a fitted constant rather than a derived quantity.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption q is not a root of unity
    Stated in Notations; needed for spectrum non-degeneracy and for q-Racah polynomial theory.
  • domain assumption π is an irreducible finite-dimensional representation of the Askey-Wilson algebra (Leonard pair of q-Racah type)
    Assumed throughout Section 2.2.1; needed for eigenbasis and transition matrix formulas.
  • ad hoc to paper Hypothesis 1: system (3.61) admits a unique admissible solution up to permutation
    Used in Lemma 3.9 and Proposition 3.4; explicitly labeled as Hypothesis based on numerical evidence.
  • ad hoc to paper Hypothesis 2: system (3.62) admits 2s+1 distinct admissible solutions up to permutation
    Used in Lemma 3.10 and Proposition 3.4; explicitly labeled as Hypothesis.
  • ad hoc to paper Existence of non-degenerate matrix W^{ǫ,M} satisfying conditions (i) and (ii) in Proposition 4.2
    Assumed without proof for general s; explicitly constructed only for s=1/2 in Section 4.3.
  • standard math Known transition matrix formulas for Leonard triples from [T04] and [H11]
    Adapted in Lemma 3.2 and Proposition 3.2; these are established results.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The $q$-Racah polynomials from scalar products of Bethe states II." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EYLP5CLG

@misc{pith2026250110310,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The $q$-Racah polynomials from scalar products of Bethe states II},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EYLP5CLG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.10310}
}
abstract

The theory of Leonard triples is applied to the derivation of normalized scalar products of on-shell and off-shell Bethe states generated from a Leonard pair. The scalar products take the form of linear combinations of $q$-Racah polynomials with coefficients depending on the off-shell parameters. Upon specializations, explicit solutions for the corresponding Belliard-Slavnov linear systems are obtained. It implies the existence of a determinant formula in terms of inhomogeneous Bethe roots for the $q$-Racah polynomials. Also, a set of relations that determines solutions (Bethe roots) of the corresponding Bethe equations of inhomogeneous type in terms of solutions of Bethe equations of homogenous type is obtained.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. Avan, S. Belliard, N. Grosjean and R.A. Pimenta, Modified algebraic Bethe ansatz for XXZ chain on the segment - III - Proof , , Nucl. Phys. B 899 (2015) 229, arXiv:1506.02147 https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.02147

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  2. [2]

    Baseilhac and R.A

    P. Baseilhac and R.A. Pimenta, Diagonalization of the Heun-Askey-Wilson operator, Leonard pairs and the algebraic Bethe ansatz , Nucl. Phys. B 949 (2019) 114824, arXiv:1909.02464 https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.02464

    arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    The $q$-Racah polynomials from scalar products of Bethe states

    P. Baseilhac and R.A. Pimenta, The q -Racah orthogonal polynomials from scalar products of Bethe states , J. Phys. A 56 (2023) 385202, arXiv:2211.14727 https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.14727

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    P.\ Baseilhac and K.\ Shigechi, A new current algebra and the reflection equation , Lett.\ Math.\ Phys.\ 92 (2010), 47-65; arXiv:0906.1482 https://arxiv.org/abs/0906.1482

    arXiv 2010

  5. [5]

    Baseilhac, L

    P. Baseilhac, L. Vinet and A. Zhedanov, The q -Onsager algebra and multivariable q -special functions , J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50 (2017) 395201; arXiv:1611.09250 https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.09250

    arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    Modified algebraic Bethe ansatz for XXZ chain on the segment - I - triangular cases

    S. Belliard , Modified algebraic Bethe ansatz for XXZ chain on the segment - I: Triangular cases , Nucl. Phys. B 892 (2015) 1, arXiv:1408.4840 https://arxiv.org/abs/1408.4840

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  7. [7]

    Belliard and N

    S. Belliard and N. Slavnov, Why scalar products in the algebraic Bethe ansatz have determinant representation , arXiv:1908.00032 https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.00032

    arXiv 1908

  8. [8]

    Belliard and N

    S. Belliard and N. Cramp\'e, Heisenberg XXX Model with General Boundaries: Eigenvectors from Algebraic Bethe Ansatz , SIGMA 9 (2013), 072, arXiv:1309.6165 https://arxiv.org/abs/1309.6165

    arXiv 2013

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    Belliard and R.A

    S. Belliard and R.A. Pimenta, Modified algebraic Bethe ansatz for XXZ chain on the segment - II - general cases , Nucl. Phys. B 894 (2015) 527, arXiv:1412.7511 https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.7511

    2015 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Belliard, R.A

    S. Belliard, R.A. Pimenta and N.A. Slavnov, Scalar product for the XXZ spin chain with general integrable boundaries , J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 54 (2021) 344001, arXiv:2103.12501 [math-ph] https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.12501

    2021 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Belliard, R.A

    S. Belliard, R.A. Pimenta and N.A. Slavnov, Modified rational six vertex model on the rectangular lattice , SciPost Phys. 16 (2024) 009, arXiv:2310.05850 [math-ph] https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.05850

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Bernard, G

    P-A. Bernard, G. Carcone, N. Cramp\'e and L. Vinet, Bethe ansatz diagonalization of the Heun-Racah operator , arXiv:2209.09213 https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.09213

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    Bernard, N

    P-A. Bernard, N. Cramp\'e, D. Shaaban Kabakibo and L. Vinet, Heun operator of Lie type and the modified algebraic Bethe ansatz , J. Math. Phys. 62 (2021) 083501, arXiv:2011.11659 https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.11659

    2021 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Cramp\'e, Algebraic Bethe ansatz for the totally asymmetric simple exclusion process with boundaries , J

    N. Cramp\'e, Algebraic Bethe ansatz for the totally asymmetric simple exclusion process with boundaries , J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 48 (2015) 08FT01, arXiv:1411.7954 https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.7954

    2015 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Crampé, J

    N. Crampé, J. Gaboriaud and S. Tsujimoto, Change of basis for the tridiagonal pairs of type II , Preprint 2025

    2025

  8. [16]

    Cao, H.-Q

    J. Cao, H.-Q. Lin, K. Shi and Y. Wang, Exact solution of XXZ spin chain with unparallel boundary fields, Nucl. Phys. B663 (2003) 487

    2003

  9. [17]

    J.\ Cao, W-L.\ Yang, K.\ Shi and Y.\ Wang, Exact solution of the XXZ alternating spin chain with generic non-diagonal boundaries , Ann.\ of Phys.\ 354 (2015) 401; arXiv:1409.3646 https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.3646

    2015 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Curtin, Modular Leonard triples , Linear Algebra and its Applications

    B. Curtin, Modular Leonard triples , Linear Algebra and its Applications. 424 (2007) 510-539

    2007

  11. [19]

    Doikou, A note on the boundary spin s XXZ chain , Phys

    A. Doikou, A note on the boundary spin s XXZ chain , Phys. Lett. A, 366 (2007) 556-562, arXiv:hep-th/0612268 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0612268

    2007 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Filali and N

    G. Filali and N. Kitanine, Partition function of the trigonometric SOS model with reflecting end , J. Stat. Mech. (2010) L06001, arXiv:1004.1015 [math-phys] https://arxiv.org/abs/1004.1015

    2010 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Granovskii and A

    Y.A. Granovskii and A. Zhedanov, Nature of the symmetry group of the 6j-symbol , Journal of Ex- perimental and Theoretical Physics 94 (1988) 49-54

    1988

  14. [22]

    Huang, The classification of Leonard triples of QRacah type , Linear Alg

    H-W. Huang, The classification of Leonard triples of QRacah type , Linear Alg. Appl. 436 (2012) 1442-1472, arXiv:1108.0458 https://arxiv.org/abs/1108.0458

    2012 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Ito and P

    T. Ito and P. Terwilliger, The augmented tridiagonal algebra , Kyushu Journal of Mathematics 64 (2010) No. 1 81-144, arXiv:0904.2889v1 https://arxiv.org/abs/0904.2889v1

    2010 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Koekoek and R

    R. Koekoek and R. Swarttouw, The Askey-scheme of hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials and its q -analogue , arXiv:math.cA/9602214v1 https://arxiv.org/abs/math.cA/9602214v1

  17. [25]

    Koornwinder, On the limit from q -Racah polynomials to big q -Jacobi polynomials , SIGMA 7 (2011) 040, 8 pages, arXiv:1011.5585v4 https://arxiv.org/abs/1011.5585

    T.H. Koornwinder, On the limit from q -Racah polynomials to big q -Jacobi polynomials , SIGMA 7 (2011) 040, 8 pages, arXiv:1011.5585v4 https://arxiv.org/abs/1011.5585

    2011 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Lévy-Leblond J.-M

    J.-M. Lévy-Leblond J.-M. and M. Lévy-Nahas, Symmetrical coupling of three angular momenta , J. Math. Phys. 6 (1965), 1372–1380

    1965

  19. [27]

    E.\ K.\ Sklyanin, Boundary conditions for integrable quantum systems , J.\ Phys.\ A 21 (1988), 2375-2389

    1988

  20. [28]

    J. M. Maillet, G. Niccoli and B. Pezelier, Transfer matrix spectrum for cyclic representations of the 6-vertex reflection algebra I , SciPost Phys. 2 (2017) 009, arXiv:1802.08853 [math-ph] https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.08853

    2017 arXiv

  21. [29]

    I , Theor

    E.\ K.\ Sklyanin, L.\ A.\ Takhtadzhyan and L.\ D.\ Faddeev, The Quantum Inverse Problem Method. I , Theor. Math. Phys. 40 (1979), 688

    1979

  22. [30]

    Slavnov, Algebraic Bethe ansatz and correlation functions: an advanced course , World Scientific Publishing (2022)

    N. Slavnov, Algebraic Bethe ansatz and correlation functions: an advanced course , World Scientific Publishing (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    Terwilliger, Leonard pairs and dual polynomial sequences , Preprint 1987

    P. Terwilliger, Leonard pairs and dual polynomial sequences , Preprint 1987

    1987

  24. [32]

    Terwilliger, Two relations that generalize the q-Serre relations and the Dolan-Grady relations , Proceedings of the Nagoya 1999 International workshop on physics and combinatorics

    P. Terwilliger, Two relations that generalize the q-Serre relations and the Dolan-Grady relations , Proceedings of the Nagoya 1999 International workshop on physics and combinatorics. Editors A. N. Kirillov, A. Tsuchiya, H. Umemura. 377-398, arXiv:math/0307016 https://arxiv.or...

    1999 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Terwilliger, Two linear transformations each tridiagonal with respect to an eigenbasis of the other , Linear Alg

    P. Terwilliger, Two linear transformations each tridiagonal with respect to an eigenbasis of the other , Linear Alg. and Appl. 330 (2001) 149–203, arXiv:math/0406555 https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0406555

    2001 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Terwilliger, Leonard pairs and the q -Racah polynomials , Linear Alg

    P. Terwilliger, Leonard pairs and the q -Racah polynomials , Linear Alg. and Appl. 387 (2004) 235-276, arXiv:math/0306301 https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0306301

    2004 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Terwilliger, Leonard pairs from 24 points of view , Rocky Mountain J

    P. Terwilliger, Leonard pairs from 24 points of view , Rocky Mountain J. Math. 32 (2002), 827-888, arXiv:math/0406577 https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0406577

    2002 arXiv

  28. [36]

    P.\ Terwilliger, The alternating central extension of the q -Onsager algebra , Comm.\ Math.\ Phys.\ 387 (2021) 1771–1819; arXiv:2103.03028 https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.03028

    2021 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Takhtadzhan and L.D

    L.A. Takhtadzhan and L.D. Faddeev, The quantum method of the inverse problem and the Heisenberg XYZ model , Russian Math. Surveys 34 5 (1979), 11-68

    1979

  30. [38]

    Terwilliger and R

    P. Terwilliger and R. Vidunas, Leonard pairs and the Askey-Wilson relations , J. Algebra and Appl. 03 (2004) 411-426, arXiv:math/0305356 https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0305356

    2004 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Wang, W.-L

    Y. Wang, W.-L. Yang, J. Cao and K. Shi, Off-Diagonal Bethe Ansatz for Exactly Solvable Models , Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, (2015)

    2015

  32. [40]

    Zhang, J

    X. Zhang, J. Cao, W.-L. Yang, K. Shi and Y. Wang, Exact solution of the relativistic quantum Toda chain , J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50 (2017) 124003, arXiv:1609.07385 [math-ph] https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.07385

    2017 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Zhedanov, ``Hidden symmetry'' of the Askey-Wilson polynomials , Theoret

    A.S. Zhedanov, ``Hidden symmetry'' of the Askey-Wilson polynomials , Theoret. and Math. Phys. 89 (1991) 1146-1157

    1991

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.