Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

R\'enyi Entanglement of Purification and Half R\'enyi Reflected Entropy in Free Scalar Theory

T0 review · 1 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In free scalar theory, Rényi entanglement of purification stays at least half the Rényi reflected entropy for 0<n<2, a step toward identifying the two measures in holographic CFTs.

desk verdict Useful numerical data point, but the central inequality is verified only for a restricted Gaussian EoP, so the main claim outruns the evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.10944 v3 pith:GQ6A43QW submitted 2025-01-19 hep-th

Liangyu Chen This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th MSC 81P4081T40
keywords entanglementofpurificationRényientropyreflectedfreescalarfieldtheoryAdS/CFTcorrespondencewedgecrosssectionGaussianansatz
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to extend a known quantum-information inequality — that entanglement of purification always costs at least half the reflected entropy — from Rényi index n≥2 to the range 0

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the Gaussian-state spectral reduction. For a Gaussian purified state, the entanglement between AA' and BB' is controlled by the eigenvalues λ_i of the matrix Λ = D A - I, and the Rényi entropy is a sum of $f^{{(n)}}$(λ_i), where $f^{{(n)}}$(x) = 1/(1-n) ln[(1-μ(x))^n/(1-μ(x)^n)] and μ(x) = (x+2-2√(1+x))/x. The Rényi EoP is the minimum of this sum over Gaussian purifications satisfying the constraints J=J_0 and M=M_0, with auxiliary systems taken the same size as the subsystems. For Rényi reflected entropy, the doubled-Hilbert-space correlators G^Φ and G^Π built by modular conjugation give the matrix C_{AÃ} = √(G^Φ_{AÃ} G^Π_{AÃ}), and $S_R^{{(n)}}$ = -1/(1-n) Tr log[(C_{AÃ}+1/2)^n - (C_{AÃ}-1/2)^n]. The inequality is checked by comparing these two computed quantities.

What would settle it

Relax the purification ansatz: allow auxiliary Hilbert spaces larger than $|A|$ and $|B|$, or allow non-Gaussian purified states, and minimize $S_{AA'}^{(n)}$ for the same free-scalar ground state at $n=1.5$; if the true minimum falls below $S_R^{(1.5)}/2$, the central inequality fails for the genuine entanglement of purification.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that in free scalar theory, the Rényi entanglement of purification $E_P^{{(n)}}$(A:B) is never smaller than half the Rényi reflected entropy $S_R^{{(n)}}$(A:B)/2 for 0<n<2, with numerical evidence for subsystem sizes |A|=|B|=1 and |A|=1, |B|=2. This is presented as an extension to non-integer and sub-two Rényi indices of the random-tensor-network inequality known for n≥2. The supporting computations generalize the Gaussian-ansatz EoP strategy to Rényi entropies and give two independent routes to Rényi reflected entropy — a correlator formula and a Gaussian wavefunction ansatz — that agree numerically. Under these methods, the difference $E_P^{{(n)}}$ - $S_R^{{(n)}}$/2 is positive and decreases with both subsystem separation and Rényi index.

Load-bearing premise

The computed Rényi EoP is the minimum within a Gaussian ansatz whose auxiliary systems have the same size as the subsystems, and the paper does not prove that this minimum equals the true EoP over all purifications.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For free scalar theory, the inequality now covers 0<n<2, filling the gap between the n≥2 random-tensor-network result and the n=1 limit relevant to holography.
  • If the n→1 limit of the inequality survives, then together with the upper bound E_P(A:B) ≤ E_W(A:B) = S_R(A:B)/2 it would force equality between EoP and half reflected entropy in holographic contexts.
  • The demonstrated monotonicity of Rényi reflected entropy and positivity of the Rényi Markov gap support the use of Rényi reflected entropy as a correlation measure for continuum free-scalar states, in contrast to finite-dimensional counterexamples.
  • The agreement between the correlator and Gaussian wavefunction methods for Rényi reflected entropy provides a cross-check that either method can be used in free theories.
  • The numerical decrease of Δ^{(n)} = E_P^{(n)} - S_R^{(n)}/2 with separation and with Rényi index suggests Δ^{(n)} itself may carry information about correlations between the two subsystems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the Gaussian minimum is not the true EoP minimum, the computed inequality is an inequality for an upper bound; the strongest test would be a purification with auxiliary Hilbert spaces larger than |A| and |B|, or a non-Gaussian ansatz, for the same free-scalar vacua.
  • Beyond the paper: the same two-method comparison could be repeated for free fermions or for the free symmetric-product orbifold CFT, and the persistence of the inequality there would indicate it is a property of Gaussian free vacua rather than of conformal symmetry.
  • Beyond the paper: because both sides are sums over single-particle eigenvalues, the inequality may have an analytic proof via majorization of the spectra, which would replace the numerical check and clarify which Hamiltonian data control the gap Δ^{(n)}.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the Rényi generalization of the inequality E_P(A:B) ≥ (1/2) S_R(A:B) in the range 0 < n < 2, motivated by the holographic conjecture that EoP and half reflected entropy are both dual to the entanglement wedge cross section. The setting is a two-dimensional free scalar on a periodic lattice. The author generalizes the Gaussian purification strategy of [1] to Rényi EoP, deriving the closed-form single-mode function f^(n)(x) in Eq. (3.23), and presents two methods for Rényi reflected entropy: a correlator method based on [34] and a Gaussian wavefunction method. Numerical results for small subsystems (|A|=|B|=1 and |A|=1, |B|=2) show that the difference E_P^(n) − S_R^(n)/2 is nonnegative for the sampled values of n, mass, and separation. The paper also reports numerical evidence for positivity of the Rényi Markov gap and monotonicity of Rényi reflected entropy.

Significance. If the inequality were established for the true EoP, it would provide useful evidence for the holographic relation between EoP and half reflected entropy. The technical contributions are real: the closed-form Rényi formula, the correlator expression (4.11), and the numerical cross-check between the correlator and Gaussian wavefunction methods are valuable and appear sound. However, the central claim is currently established only for a restricted quantity—the minimum over Gaussian purifications with minimal auxiliary size—which is an upper bound on the true EoP. The significance for holography is therefore conditional unless the optimality of the Gaussian minimal-size ansatz is addressed or the claim is explicitly reframed as an inequality for Gaussian-purification EoP.

major comments (1)
  1. [Sec. 3.3, Eq. (3.24); Sec. 5.1] The quantity called E_P^{(n)} in the central inequality is not the Rényi EoP defined in Eq. (2.2), but the minimum over Gaussian purifications of the form (3.7) with auxiliary sizes fixed to |A| and |B| (the minimal-size ansatz). Since this admissible set is a strict subset of all purifications, the computed value is an upper bound on the true EoP: E_P^{ansatz} ≥ E_P^{true}. Therefore the verified inequality E_P^{ansatz} ≥ S_R^{(n)}/2 does not imply E_P^{true} ≥ S_R^{(n)}/2; the true value could fall below the bound. The manuscript itself acknowledges this gap in Sec. 5.1, where the minimal-size restriction is adopted because the full parameter space is too large, and in Sec. 6.5, where checking the minimal Gaussian ansatz in a broader range is listed as future work. Unless optimality of the Gaussian minimal-size purification is proven, or the claim is restated as an inequality for the Gaussian-purification EoP, the abstract and Sec. 5.1 overstate what has been established.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (3.12)] The formula for f(x) is printed as "log √x / 2"; if the intended expression is log(√x/2), please write it unambiguously, since the placement of the factor 2 affects the numerical evaluation and the comparison with the standard Bombelli entropy formula.
  2. [Sec. 5.1, Fig. 4] The notation E_P versus E_P^{(n)} is used inconsistently in the text and figure captions, and there is a typo in the caption "difference Rényi of Entanglement of Purification"; please define E_P^{(n)} for the Rényi quantity and use it consistently throughout.
  3. [Sec. 5.2] The |A|=1, |B|=2 results are presented only for m=0.1 and N=20, while the |A|=|B|=1 case uses m=0.001 and N=60; the text should explicitly state the parameter regimes in which the inequality has been checked and note that the small-mass, large-chain regime for |B|=2 remains unexplored.
  4. [Sec. 6.1 and Abstract] The abstract's "demonstrated the positivity of the Rényi Markov gap and the monotonicity of the Rényi reflected entropy" is stronger than the numerical evidence; these statements should be qualified as numerical observations in the sampled parameter range, especially because counterexamples to reflected-entropy monotonicity exist for general states, as cited in Sec. 6.2.
  5. [Sec. 4.2 and Fig. 3] The Gaussian wavefunction method for reflected entropy depends on selecting the branch x ≥ y, with the other branch discarded because it does not match the correlator method; the manuscript should state explicitly that this branch choice is an additional assumption used only as a consistency check, since the final reflected-entropy values are obtained from the correlator method.
  6. [Sec. 5.3] The sentence about assigning parameter values "based on some observations and guesses" is vague; either describe the heuristic in enough detail to be reproducible or defer the discussion of larger subsystem sizes more clearly to future work.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the Rényi inequality is computed, not fitted, from the free-scalar Hamiltonian; the Gaussian minimal-size ansatz is a validity limitation, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The Rényi EoP in Eq. (3.24) is obtained from the lattice free-scalar Hamiltonian (3.1): the ground-state W matrix fixes the covariance blocks J0, K0, L0, and E_P^(n) is the minimum over Gaussian purifications of the Rényi entropy f^(n) of the reduced state. The Rényi reflected entropy in Eq. (4.11) is computed independently from the doubled-Hilbert-space correlators (4.8), which are themselves fixed by X and P from the same W matrix; the Gaussian-wavefunction calculation is a second independent route, and the branch used is checked against the correlator method. No parameter is tuned to enforce E_P^(n) >= S_R^(n)/2; the inequality is evaluated after separate computation of both quantities, and it is not a definitional identity because the canonical purification is one feasible candidate in the Gaussian purification family, so E_P^(n) <= S_R^(n) is the trivial direction while E_P^(n) >= S_R^(n)/2 is the nontrivial claim. The paper explicitly flags the real limitation: Sec. 5.1 states 'here the E_p is computed by Gaussian ansatz' and 'we will choose the size of auxiliary system is the same as originals subsystem, this is called minimal (size) ansatz', and Sec. 6.5 lists 'check the minimal Gaussian ansatz introduced in [1] in a broader range' as future work. Because the minimization is restricted to Gaussian purifications with minimal auxiliary dimension, the computed E_P^(n) is an upper bound on the true EoP of Eq. (2.2), so the numerical evidence supports, but does not prove, the inequality for the unrestricted EoP. This is a scope/validity gap rather than a circular step: the quantity being checked is not made equal to the target inequality by construction, and the ansatz is imported from [1] (not from the present author's own prior work).

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Gaussian purification ansatz and the minimal-size ansatz from [1], plus the standard Gaussian-state entropy spectrum. No new entities are introduced. The main unproven input is the optimality of the Gaussian ansatz; if false, the computed EoP is only an upper bound.

free parameters (1)
  • Gaussian wavefunction branch choice = x >= y
    In Sec. 4.2, the solution branch with x >= y is selected because it matches the correlator method and gives the expected decay behavior; the other branch is discarded. This is a hand-chosen selection, not derived from the canonical purification equations alone.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The optimal purification of the Gaussian reduced state is itself Gaussian.
    Sec. 3.2 assumes the purified state has Gaussian form, following [1]; no proof is given that the minimum over all purifications is attained within this class.
  • domain assumption Auxiliary subsystem sizes are set equal to the original subsystem sizes (minimal size ansatz).
    Sec. 5.1 states this choice is made to reduce the parameter space; it restricts the purification and makes the computed EoP an upper bound if the ansatz is not exact.
  • ad hoc to paper In the Gaussian wavefunction method for reflected entropy, the physical solution branch satisfies x >= y.
    Sec. 4.2 finds two branches solving the canonical purification conditions; the x >= y branch is selected because it matches the correlator method, not from a derivation.
  • standard math The spectrum of the reduced Gaussian density matrix is determined by the correlation matrix C = sqrt(G_Phi G_Pi) relations of [34,38].
    Used for Rényi reflected entropy formulas (4.11) and (A.29); accepted from prior literature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of R\'enyi Entanglement of Purification and Half R\'enyi Reflected Entropy in Free Scalar Theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GQ6A43QW

@misc{pith2026250110944,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: R\'enyi Entanglement of Purification and Half R\'enyi Reflected Entropy in Free Scalar Theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GQ6A43QW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.10944}
}
abstract

In the AdS/CFT context, the entanglement of purification (EoP, denoted as $E_{P}$) of CFT is conjectured to be dual to the entanglement wedge cross section (EWCS) in bulk. However, another quantity called reflected entropy $S_{R}$ is also supposed to be dual to two times the EWCS. A natural question is whether they are the same in holographic CFTs even though they are different in general. Previous studies have shown $E_{P} \ge \frac{1}{2} S_{R}^{(n)}, n \ge2$ for random tensor networks. In this paper, we study this inequality beyond $n \ge 2$, and we focus on the range $0 < n < 2$. However, the calculations of EoP are notoriously difficult in general. Thus, our calculations mainly focus on the free scalar theory which is close to the holographic CFTs. We generalized the previous strategy for EoP in \cite{Takayanagi:2018sbw} to the R\'enyi case. And we have also presented two methods for R\'enyi reflected entropy, one is using correlators, the other one is Gaussian wavefunction ansatz. Our calculations show that the inequality still holds for $0 < n < 2$, and it may give us some insights into the equivalence of EoP and half reflected entropy in holographic CFTs. As byproducts of our research, we have also demonstrated the positivity of the R\'enyi Markov gap and the monotonicity of the R\'enyi reflected entropy in the free scalar theory.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Optimal symmetry operators

    hep-th 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The Araki cone α=0 purification uniquely attains the Uhlmann fidelity, defining an 'optimal symmetry operator' with maximal expectation value.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Bhattacharyya, T

    A. Bhattacharyya, T. Takayanagi and K. Umemoto,Entanglement of Purification in Free Scalar Field Theories,JHEP04(2018) 132 [1802.09545]

    arXiv 2018

  2. [34]

    Bueno and H

    P. Bueno and H. Casini,Reflected entropy for free scalars,JHEP11(2020) 148 [2008.11373]

    arXiv 2020

  3. [2]

    Maldacena,The large-N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, International Journal of Theoretical Physics38(1999) 1113

    J. Maldacena,The large-N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, International Journal of Theoretical Physics38(1999) 1113

    work page 1999

  4. [3]

    Witten,Anti-de Sitter space and holography,Adv

    E. Witten,Anti-de Sitter space and holography,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150]

    arXiv 1998

  5. [4]

    Gubser, I

    S. Gubser, I. Klebanov and A. Polyakov,Gauge theory correlators from non-critical string theory,Physics Letters B428(1998) 105

    work page 1998

  6. [5]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi,Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001]

    arXiv 2006

  7. [6]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi,Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy,JHEP08(2006) 045 [hep-th/0605073]

    arXiv 2006

  8. [7]

    Takayanagi and K

    T. Takayanagi and K. Umemoto,Entanglement of purification through holographic duality, Nature Phys.14(2018) 573 [1708.09393]

    arXiv 2018

Show all 60 references
  1. [8]

    Nguyen, T

    P. Nguyen, T. Devakul, M. G. Halbasch, M. P. Zaletel and B. Swingle,Entanglement of purification: from spin chains to holography,JHEP01(2018) 098 [1709.07424]

    2018 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Bao and I

    N. Bao and I. F. Halpern,Holographic Inequalities and Entanglement of Purification,JHEP 03(2018) 006 [1710.07643]

    2018 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Tamaoka,Entanglement Wedge Cross Section from the Dual Density Matrix,Phys

    K. Tamaoka,Entanglement Wedge Cross Section from the Dual Density Matrix,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 141601 [1809.09109]

    2019 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Hirai, K

    H. Hirai, K. Tamaoka and T. Yokoya,Towards entanglement of purification for conformal field theories,Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics2018(2018) 063B03

    2018

  5. [12]

    Umemoto and Y

    K. Umemoto and Y. Zhou,Entanglement of Purification for Multipartite States and its Holographic Dual,JHEP10(2018) 152 [1805.02625]. – 25 –

    2018 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Bao and I

    N. Bao and I. F. Halpern,Conditional and Multipartite Entanglements of Purification and Holography,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 046010 [1805.00476]

    2019 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Esp ´ ındola, A

    R. Esp ´ ındola, A. Guijosa and J. F. Pedraza,Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and Entanglement of Purification,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 646 [1804.05855]

    2018 arXiv

  8. [15]

    N. Bao, A. Chatwin-Davies and G. N. Remmen,Entanglement of Purification and Multiboundary Wormhole Geometries,JHEP02(2019) 110 [1811.01983]

    2019 arXiv

  9. [16]

    N. Bao, G. Penington, J. Sorce and A. C. Wall,Beyond Toy Models: Distilling Tensor Networks in Full AdS/CFT,JHEP11(2019) 069 [1812.01171]

    2019 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Caputa, M

    P. Caputa, M. Miyaji, T. Takayanagi and K. Umemoto,Holographic Entanglement of Purification from Conformal Field Theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 111601 [1812.05268]

    2019 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Babaei Velni, M

    K. Babaei Velni, M. R. Mohammadi Mozaffar and M. H. Vahidinia,Some Aspects of Entanglement Wedge Cross-Section,JHEP05(2019) 200 [1903.08490]

    2019 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Babaei Velni, M

    K. Babaei Velni, M. R. Mohammadi Mozaffar and M. H. Vahidinia,Entanglement wedge cross section growth during thermalization,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 106014 [2302.12882]

    2023 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Dutta and T

    S. Dutta and T. Faulkner,A canonical purification for the entanglement wedge cross-section, JHEP03(2021) 178 [1905.00577]

    2021 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Jeong, K.-Y

    H.-S. Jeong, K.-Y. Kim and M. Nishida,Reflected Entropy and Entanglement Wedge Cross Section with the First Order Correction,JHEP12(2019) 170 [1909.02806]

    2019 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Hayden, O

    P. Hayden, O. Parrikar and J. Sorce,The Markov gap for geometric reflected entropy,JHEP 10(2021) 047 [2107.00009]

    2021 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Akers and P

    C. Akers and P. Rath,Entanglement Wedge Cross Sections Require Tripartite Entanglement, JHEP04(2020) 208 [1911.07852]

    2020 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Kusuki and K

    Y. Kusuki and K. Tamaoka,Entanglement Wedge Cross Section from CFT: Dynamics of Local Operator Quench,JHEP02(2020) 017 [1909.06790]

    2020 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Moosa,Time dependence of reflected entropy in rational and holographic conformal field theories,JHEP05(2020) 082 [2001.05969]

    M. Moosa,Time dependence of reflected entropy in rational and holographic conformal field theories,JHEP05(2020) 082 [2001.05969]

    2020 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Kudler-Flam, Y

    J. Kudler-Flam, Y. Kusuki and S. Ryu,Correlation measures and the entanglement wedge cross-section after quantum quenches in two-dimensional conformal field theories,JHEP04 (2020) 074 [2001.05501]

    2020 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Boruch,Entanglement wedge cross-section in shock wave geometries,JHEP07(2020) 208 [2006.10625]

    J. Boruch,Entanglement wedge cross-section in shock wave geometries,JHEP07(2020) 208 [2006.10625]

    2020 arXiv

  21. [28]

    T. Li, J. Chu and Y. Zhou,Reflected Entropy for an Evaporating Black Hole,JHEP11 (2020) 155 [2006.10846]

    2020 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Bao and N

    N. Bao and N. Cheng,Multipartite Reflected Entropy,JHEP10(2019) 102 [1909.03154]

    2019 arXiv

  23. [30]

    J. Chu, R. Qi and Y. Zhou,Generalizations of Reflected Entropy and the Holographic Dual, JHEP03(2020) 151 [1909.10456]

    2020 arXiv

  24. [31]

    M.-K. Yuan, M. Li and Y. Zhou,Reflected multi-entropy and its holographic dual, 2410.08546

  25. [32]

    Akers, T

    C. Akers, T. Faulkner, S. Lin and P. Rath,Entanglement of purification in random tensor networks,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) L101902 [2306.06163]. – 26 –

    2024 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Couch, P

    J. Couch, P. Nguyen, S. Racz, G. Stratis and Y. Zhang,Possibility of entanglement of purification to be less than half of the reflected entropy,Phys. Rev. A109(2024) 022426 [2309.02506]

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Casini and M

    H. Casini and M. Huerta,Entanglement entropy in free quantum field theory,J. Phys. A42 (2009) 504007 [0905.2562]

    2009 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Berthiere and G

    C. Berthiere and G. Parez,Reflected entropy and computable cross-norm negativity: Free theories and symmetry resolution,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 054508 [2307.11009]

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    B. M. Terhal, M. Horodecki, D. W. Leung and D. P. DiVincenzo,The entanglement of purification,J. Math. Phys.43(2002) 4286 [quant-ph/0202044]

    2002 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Bombelli, R

    L. Bombelli, R. K. Koul, J. Lee and R. D. Sorkin,Quantum source of entropy for black holes, Phys. Rev. D34(1986) 373

    1986

  31. [39]

    Hayden, M

    P. Hayden, M. Lemm and J. Sorce,Reflected entropy: Not a correlation measure,Phys. Rev. A107(2023) L050401 [2302.10208]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    J. K. Basak, D. Giataganas, S. Mondal and W.-Y. Wen,Reflected entropy and Markov gap in noninertial frames,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 125009 [2306.17490]

    2023 arXiv

  33. [41]

    M. R. Gaberdiel and R. Gopakumar,Tensionless string spectra on AdS 3,JHEP05(2018) 085 [1803.04423]

    2018 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Eberhardt, M

    L. Eberhardt, M. R. Gaberdiel and R. Gopakumar,The Worldsheet Dual of the Symmetric Product CFT,JHEP04(2019) 103 [1812.01007]

    2019 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Eberhardt, M

    L. Eberhardt, M. R. Gaberdiel and R. Gopakumar,Deriving the AdS 3/CFT2 correspondence,JHEP02(2020) 136 [1911.00378]

    2020 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Eberhardt,Partition functions of the tensionless string,JHEP03(2021) 176 [2008.07533]

    L. Eberhardt,Partition functions of the tensionless string,JHEP03(2021) 176 [2008.07533]

    2021 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Wong,Entanglement and local holography in quantum gravity,2504.03452

    G. Wong,Entanglement and local holography in quantum gravity,2504.03452

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    Holzhey, F

    C. Holzhey, F. Larsen and F. Wilczek,Geometric and renormalized entropy in conformal field theory,Nucl. Phys. B424(1994) 443 [hep-th/9403108]

    1994 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Vidal, J

    G. Vidal, J. I. Latorre, E. Rico and A. Kitaev,Entanglement in quantum critical phenomena, Phys. Rev. Lett.90(2003) 227902 [quant-ph/0211074]

    2003 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. L. Cardy,Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory,J. Stat. Mech. 0406(2004) P06002 [hep-th/0405152]

    2004 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Kokail, R

    C. Kokail, R. van Bijnen, A. Elben, B. Vermersch and P. Zoller,Entanglement hamiltonian tomography in quantum simulation,Nature Physics17(2021) 936

    2021

  42. [50]

    Hayden, S

    P. Hayden, S. Nezami, X.-L. Qi, N. Thomas, M. Walter and Z. Yang,Holographic duality from random tensor networks,JHEP11(2016) 009 [1601.01694]

    2016 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Peres,Separability criterion for density matrices,Phys

    A. Peres,Separability criterion for density matrices,Phys. Rev. Lett.77(1996) 1413 [quant-ph/9604005]

    1996 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Vidal and R

    G. Vidal and R. F. Werner,Computable measure of entanglement,Phys. Rev. A65(2002) 032314 [quant-ph/0102117]. – 27 –

    2002 arXiv

  45. [53]

    M. B. Plenio,Logarithmic Negativity: A Full Entanglement Monotone That is not Convex, Phys. Rev. Lett.95(2005) 090503 [quant-ph/0505071]

    2005 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Calabrese, J

    P. Calabrese, J. Cardy and E. Tonni,Entanglement negativity in quantum field theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.109(2012) 130502 [1206.3092]

    2012 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Calabrese, J

    P. Calabrese, J. Cardy and E. Tonni,Entanglement negativity in extended systems: A field theoretical approach,J. Stat. Mech.1302(2013) P02008 [1210.5359]

    2013 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Kudler-Flam and S

    J. Kudler-Flam and S. Ryu,Entanglement negativity and minimal entanglement wedge cross sections in holographic theories,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 106014 [1808.00446]

    2019 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Vidal and Y

    G. Vidal and Y. Chen,Entanglement contour,J. Stat. Mech.2014(2014) P10011 [1406.1471]

    2014 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Wen,Balanced Partial Entanglement and the Entanglement Wedge Cross Section,JHEP 04(2021) 301 [2103.00415]

    Q. Wen,Balanced Partial Entanglement and the Entanglement Wedge Cross Section,JHEP 04(2021) 301 [2103.00415]

    2021 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Jiang, P

    X. Jiang, P. Wang, H. Wu and H. Yang,An alternative to purification in CFT,2406.09033

    arXiv

  52. [60]

    Srednicki,Entropy and area,Phys

    M. Srednicki,Entropy and area,Phys. Rev. Lett.71(1993) 666 [hep-th/9303048]. – 28 –

    1993 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.