Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 66 references

Carrollian superstring in the flipped vacuum

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In the flipped vacuum of the N=2 homogeneous Carrollian superstring, keeping nonzero winding in the infinite-radius limit removes the truncation of the massless spectrum, and the graviton three-point amplitude is the tensile superstring…

desk verdict A clean T-duality result for Carrollian superstrings sits next to a decompactification limit that does not define the claimed non-truncated flat-space spectrum; worth refereeing, but the central argument needs to be rebuilt. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.11011 v3 pith:CQNMIRZX submitted 2025-01-19 hep-th

Bin Chen , Zezhou Hu This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th MSC 81T3081T4083E30 PACS 11.25.-w
keywords Carrollianstringtensionlessflippedvacuumsuper-BMS3algebraT-dualitygravityscatteringamplitudesflatholography
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the Carrollian superstring, quantized in the flipped vacuum, has a massless spectrum that does not truncate. The key move is to keep nonvanishing winding while taking the infinite-radius limit, so that the level condition $N_f+\tilde N_f-a_L=-w_T^a k_T^a$ is satisfied at arbitrarily high oscillator levels. Since the selection rule $w_T^a p_a<0$ holds in every active winding direction, infinitely many massless states survive, making the theory a candidate higher-spin-like system rather than a finitely truncated one. The paper also constructs graviton vertex operators and derives a three-point amplitude that is the tensile superstring answer with each momentum contraction weighted by $\eta(\mu)$, distinguishing Poincaré directions from Carrollian directions. If correct, this gives a concrete string-theoretic setting for ultralocal Carrollian gravity and for flat-space holography.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the flipped vacuum—the highest-weight representation in which all positive oscillator modes annihilate the vacuum, $A_n|0\rangle=B_n|0\rangle=\psi_r|0\rangle=\tilde\psi_r|0\rangle=0$ for $n,r>0$—together with the homogeneous super-$\mathfrak{bms}_3$ algebra generated by $L_n,M_n,H_r,\tilde H_r$. The algebra supplies the physical-state conditions and the normal-ordering constant $a_L$. A second piece is the decompactification prescription: momenta scale as $k_T=p R_T$ while winding $w_T$ is held fixed, so the $L_0$ condition contains an arbitrarily large negative term that must be balanced by oscillator number. A third piece is the $\eta(\mu)$-weighted tensor $V^{\mu\nu\rho}$ in the three-point amplitude, which keeps the tensile contractions for Poincaré indices and kills any contraction involving a Carrollian index.

What would settle it

Evaluate the two-point function of two bosonic gravitational vertex operators (3.18) with transverse-traceless polarizations using the flipped-vacuum OPEs; the paper predicts it is identically zero, so any nonzero regulator-independent value would falsify the zero-norm decoupling on which the spectrum rests.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the flipped vacuum (the highest-weight representation) of the N=2 homogeneous Carrollian superstring, physical states are selected by the super-$\mathfrak{bms}_3$ constraints $L_n|\mathrm{phys}\rangle=M_n|\mathrm{phys}\rangle=H_r|\mathrm{phys}\rangle=\tilde H_r|\mathrm{phys}\rangle=0$. The paper discards all bosonic excitations and the inhomogeneous superstring sector because, under the flipped vacuum, those states have zero norm; only normalizable fermionic excitations remain. When a Poincaré spatial direction is decompactified by sending $R_T\to\infty$ with $k_T/R_T\to p^a$ fixed while the winding $w_T$ is held fixed, the on-shell conditions become $(p^a)^2=0$ together with $N_f+\tilde N_f-a_L=-w_T^a k_T^a\to-w_T^a p^a R_T^a$, so the required oscillator level can be arbitrarily large. Hence, for every Carrollian superstring except the conventional $q=9$ case, the massless spectrum is an infinite tower. The constructed three-point graviton amplitude is $A_3\propto f_{1\mu\sigma}f_{2\nu\omega}f_{3\rho\lambda}V^{\mu\nu\rho}V^{\sigma\omega\lambda}$, with $V^{\mu\nu\rho}=\eta^{\mu\nu}p_{12}^{\rho}\eta(\rho)+\eta^{\nu\rho}p_{23}^{\mu}\eta(\mu)+\eta^{\rho\mu}p_{31}^{\nu}\eta(\nu)$; this reduces to the type-II result when $q=0$ and vanishes when $q=9$, and the $\eta(\mu)$ factors encode the ultralocal distinction between Poincaré and Carrollian directions.

Load-bearing premise

The physical spectrum is defined by discarding every zero-norm sector—all bosonic excitations and all inhomogeneous-superstring excitations—on the assumption that these states decouple from scattering and that the flipped vacuum supplies the correct state-operator dictionary; if any zero-norm state participates, or if a different vacuum is the physical one, the tower and the amplitudes change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Under the decompactification prescription with winding held fixed, any Carrollian superstring with $q\neq9$ has massless states at arbitrarily high oscillator levels, so a low-energy description must treat infinitely many higher-spin-like modes on equal footing.
  • The compactified Carrollian superstring with a Poincaré circle of radius $R_T$ is T-dual to the one with a Carrollian circle of radius $R_C=1/(2R_T)$, with $k_C=w_T$ and $w_C=k_T$; the two theories share the same homogeneous super-$\mathfrak{bms}_3$ generators.
  • The three-point graviton amplitude is fixed by $V^{\mu\nu\rho}$: it matches the type-II superstring amplitude for $q=0$ and vanishes for $q=9$, in agreement with the absence of local propagating gravitons in conventional Carrollian gravity.
  • Tree-level amplitudes with bosonic excitations along Carrollian directions vanish because their vertex operators contain no $\lambda^i$ field, so those directions are non-dynamical at this order.
  • Higher-point amplitudes acquire a factor $\exp\left(\sum_{i<j}\eta_{ab}p_i^a p_j^b y_{ij}/(2x_{ij})\right)$, a $y$-dependent structure with no analogue in tensile string theory.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the tower survives loop corrections, the Carrollian superstring may supply a genuinely stringy realization of a massless higher-spin-like spectrum in flat or null backgrounds—a possibility the paper leaves open, since interacting higher-spin theories are normally obstructed without a cosmological constant.
  • The one-way selection rule $w_T^a p_a<0$ means every winding-mode state has a preferred orientation on its circle; a torus one-point function or a thermal partition function would show whether this directional bias persists and affects vacuum energy.
  • T-duality exchanges a Poincaré circle with a Carrollian circle, so iterating the transformation may interpolate through the parameter $q$ and connect the tensionless string ($q=0$) to conventional Carrollian gravity ($q=9$); constructing the Buscher-like transformation at the level of vertex operators would test this directly.
  • Checking the four-point amplitude against the $c\to0$ limit of the tensile amplitude with the same polarizations would test whether the full Carrollian gravitational S-matrix is simply the ultrarelativistic limit of Einstein gravity or a genuinely new object.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the N=2 homogeneous Carrollian superstring in the flipped vacuum (highest-weight representation). It demonstrates a T-duality between a string with one compactified Poincaré direction and one with one compactified Carrollian direction, deriving the shared homogeneous super-BMS3 algebra and zero-mode identification. It then analyzes the spectrum via highest-weight constraints: bosonic and inhomogeneous-fermionic excitations are discarded for having zero norm, fermionic excitations survive, and a non-truncated spectrum is claimed in the flat-space limit by allowing nonzero winding as the compactification radius tends to infinity. The paper also constructs graviton vertex operators in the (0,0) picture and computes three-point amplitudes, finding a form resembling the tensile superstring result with additional η-function factors. The text concludes with a discussion of the ultrarelativistic origin of these η functions and of the potential relevance to Carrollian gravity and higher-spin theories.

Significance. The paper contains useful algebraic material: explicit mode expansions, commutators, T-duality maps between electric and magnetic Carrollian string sectors, and a concrete proposal for graviton vertex operators and amplitudes in a Carrollian superstring. The T-duality identification in Section 2.1 is explicit and internally consistent, and the authors are careful to distinguish the cases q=0, q=9, and 0<q<9. However, the central claim of a non-truncated flat-space spectrum rests on a limit that is not mathematically well defined, and the discarding of all zero-norm sectors is assumed rather than proven. If the authors can supply a direct construction of the flat-space physical Hilbert space, or revise the claim to the compactified theory, the paper would be a useful contribution. The amplitude computation is plausible but rests on unstated derivations of the picture-changing operator and the integration measure.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2.2, Eq. (2.40)] The claim that the flat-space spectrum is non-truncated is not established. Under the decompactification limit k_T^a/R_T^a → p^a with w_T^a fixed and the selection rule w_T^a p^a < 0, the right-hand side of Eq. (2.40) diverges to +∞ as R_T^a → ∞. Since N_f and \tilde N_f are nonnegative integers, no finite-level state with nonzero winding satisfies the highest-weight condition at R=∞. The physical-state condition and the R→∞ limit therefore do not commute, and the compactified Hilbert space has no well-defined direct limit containing the described tower. The authors should either define the flat-space physical Hilbert space directly (for example, through BRST cohomology) or restate the non-truncation claim as a property of the compactified theory.
  2. [§2.2 (after Eq. (2.30)) and Appendix A] The physical spectrum is defined by discarding all zero-norm sectors: bosonic excitations and the inhomogeneous superstring sector. The justification given — that these states have zero norm, form BMS multiplets rather than singlets, and have vanishing two-point functions — is a heuristic consistent with decoupling, but it is not a proof. In a BRST formulation such states could be exact (decouple from amplitudes) or could contribute to gauge-noninvariant sectors; the paper does not perform BRST quantization. This assumption is load-bearing both for the claimed spectrum and for the gravitational amplitudes, and it should be supported by an explicit decoupling argument or a full BRST analysis.
  3. [§3, Eqs. (3.21)-(3.26)] The vertex operators and amplitudes are constructed only for the zero-winding states of the truncated spectrum (2.36). The infinite tower of states that follows from Eq. (2.40) is never represented by vertex operators, so the paper's central claim about a non-truncated spectrum is not connected to the scattering analysis. Either the non-truncated states should be shown to have vertex operators and amplitudes, or the non-truncation claim should be presented as a statement about the on-shell spectrum only, with the amplitude section explicitly restricted to the zero-winding subsector.
  4. [§3, Eq. (3.23)] The (0,0)-picture vertex operator V_{f,p}^{(0,0)} is stated without a derivation from the super-BMS generators and picture-changing operators. The authors refer to the standard process in [21,59,60], but because the worldsheet is a null plane rather than a Riemann surface, the replacement of z, \bar z by x is nontrivial and affects not only the OPEs but also the integration measure and the prefactors in Eq. (3.26). Please provide the derivation of Eq. (3.23), including the action of H_{-1/2} and \tilde H_{-1/2} and the normalization in Eq. (3.26).
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.1, Eq. (2.32)] In the second line of Eq. (2.32), the zero mode of the Carrollian compact direction is written as B^a_0 = 2w^i_C/R_C; the superscript on B should be i rather than a.
  2. [§3.1, Eq. (3.5)] In the OPEs for the primary fermions, the right-hand sides contain the index i ("∂xψ^i", "ψ^i") where the generic index μ is evidently intended; please correct these indices.
  3. [§2.2, Eqs. (2.31), (2.34), (2.40)] The normal-ordering constant a_L is written as a single parameter, but Eq. (2.34) implies sector-dependent values (1, 1/2, 1/2, 1 for NS-NS, NS-R, R-NS, R-R). Please clarify whether a_L depends on the sector or how the different values arise from the fermionic zero modes.
  4. [§2.2, Eq. (2.40)] The chain N_f + \tilde N_f - a_L = -w^a_T k^a_T → -w^a_T p^a R^a_T → +∞ compresses two different limits: the decompactification limit k/R → p and the large-R limit at fixed w,p. Please spell out these steps and state explicitly that the sign assumes the selection rule w^a_T p^a < 0.
  5. [§3.2, Eq. (3.26)] The three-point amplitude is first written with "∝" and then as an equality with a specific prefactor i g_s/64 and a momentum-conservation delta function. The numerical prefactor and the factors x^2_{12}x^2_{23}x^2_{31} should be derived or their origin explained, since the integration measure in the null-plane BMS field theory is not the same as in a standard CFT.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No substantive circularity found: the spectrum condition and three-point amplitude are derived from the stated mode expansions and physical-state conditions, with only minor reliance on the authors' prior technical results.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained rather than circular. The non-truncated spectrum claim follows algebraically from the mode expansions and highest-weight constraints: with A0^a = 2 w_T^a R_T^a and B0^a = k_T^a / R_T^a, the L0 condition (2.31) gives Eq. (2.40), N_f + Ntilde_f - a_L = -w_T^a k_T^a = -w_T^a p^a R_T^a. The infinite tower is a direct consequence of the chosen decompactification limit k ~ p R at fixed nonzero winding, not an assumed input. Similarly, the three-point graviton amplitude (3.26)-(3.27) is computed from the vertex operators and picture-changing formalism, and the eta-function structure follows from the different mode assignments of the Poincar\'e and Carrollian directions; the agreement with the c -> 0 limit of the tensile superstring amplitude in Section 4 is presented as a consistency check, not as the source of the result. The paper does rely on the authors' earlier work [21] for the normal-ordering constant, anomaly terms, and BRST/picture-changing technology, and on [12,13] for BMS field-theory techniques, but these are technical inputs rather than conclusions: the central non-truncation and amplitude formulas do not reduce to those citations. One caveat is that Eq. (2.40) has a mathematical well-definedness issue in the strict R -> infinity limit, since the right-hand side diverges unless the oscillator level also diverges; this is a potential correctness risk about the direct-limit construction, not a circularity. The exclusion of zero-norm bosonic and inhomogeneous-fermionic sectors is an explicitly stated physical choice based on normalization and decoupling, not a hidden fit or a prediction renamed as an input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters fitted to data and no new physical entities. Its central claims rest instead on four domain assumptions inherited from the tensionless/Carrollian program: the flipped vacuum, the restriction to homogeneous fermions (discarding zero-norm sectors), the GSO projection and anomaly content taken from [21], and the specific decompactification limit with nonzero winding. The last is the least standard and is what generates the non-truncated spectrum claim.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The flipped vacuum (highest-weight representation, Eq. 2.26) is the correct vacuum for defining the Carrollian superstring spectrum and state-operator correspondence.
    Motivated by [12,13] for BMS field theory; the paper does not derive this choice from the tensile string limit.
  • domain assumption Only the homogeneous superstring sector is physical; bosonic excitations and the inhomogeneous sector are ignored because their states have zero norm.
    Section 2.2 and Appendix A; the decoupling of zero-norm states from the S-matrix is assumed, not shown.
  • domain assumption The GSO projection (Eq. 2.35) and normal-ordering constant a_L from [21] apply to the Carrollian superstring to yield spacetime SUSY.
    Eq. (2.31) and (2.34)-(2.36). These are carried over from tensile/tensionless superstring theory.
  • ad hoc to paper The decompactification limit is k_T^a / R_T^a tends to p^a with winding w_T^a held fixed (Eqs. 2.39-2.40); states with arbitrarily high oscillator level N are then admitted in the spectrum.
    This limit is chosen to exhibit the non-truncated spectrum; if one first takes w to 0, the spectrum truncates as in earlier work. The choice is motivated by the form of L0 but is an interpretive step.
  • standard math The null-plane map (3.1) and the 2D BMS field theory techniques of [12] are valid for defining string vertex operators and amplitudes.
    Section 3 uses these as background tools without re-derivation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Carrollian superstring in the flipped vacuum." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CQNMIRZX

@misc{pith2026250111011,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Carrollian superstring in the flipped vacuum},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CQNMIRZX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.11011}
}
abstract

In this work, we study the spectrum of the Carrollian superstring in the flipped vacuum (the highest-weight representation) in detail. The target spacetime of the Carrollian string has a generalized Carrollian symmetry, and it is composed of both Poincar\'e directions and Carrollian directions. We explicitly show that two homogeneous Carrollian superstring theories, one with compactified Poincar\'e direction and the other with compactified Carrollian direction, share the same BMS$_3$ symmetry, and their zero modes can be identified under the usual T-duality transformation. Moreover, we investigate the spectrum of a general Carrollian superstring in the flipped vacuum. As the string can still have nonvanishing winding along the spatial direction in the infinite radius limit, the spectrum of the Carrollian strings in the flat background is no longer truncated. We furthermore construct the vertex operators of gravitons and discuss their scattering amplitudes. We find that the form of 3-point amplitudes differs from that of the usual tensile superstrings only by a simple function, which reflects the ultra-local nature of Carrollian physics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

  1. [21]

    Path-integral quantization of tensionless (super) string,

    B. Chen, Z. Hu, Z.-f. Yu, and Y.-f. Zheng, “Path-integral quantization of tensionless (super) string,” JHEP 08 (2023) 133, arXiv:2302.05975 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2023

  2. [1]

    String Theory Beyond the Planck Scale,

    D. J. Gross and P. F. Mende, “String Theory Beyond the Planck Scale,” Nucl. Phys. B 303 (1988) 407–454

    1988

  3. [2]

    The High-Energy Behavior of String Scattering Amplitudes,

    D. J. Gross and P. F. Mende, “The High-Energy Behavior of String Scattering Amplitudes,” Phys. Lett. B197 (1987) 129–134

    work page 1987

  4. [3]

    High-Energy Symmetries of String Theory,

    D. J. Gross, “High-Energy Symmetries of String Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett.60 (1988) 1229

    work page 1988

  5. [4]

    On the Gravitational Interaction of Massless Higher Spin Fields,

    E. S. Fradkin and M. A. Vasiliev, “On the Gravitational Interaction of Massless Higher Spin Fields,” Phys. Lett. B189 (1987) 89–95

    work page 1987

  6. [5]

    Higher spin gauge theories in various dimensions,

    M. A. Vasiliev, “Higher spin gauge theories in various dimensions,” PoS JHW2003 (2003) 003, arXiv:hep-th/0401177

    arXiv 2003

  7. [6]

    Classical Null Strings,

    A. Schild, “Classical Null Strings,” Phys. Rev. D16 (1977) 1722

    work page 1977

  8. [7]

    Classical and quantized tensionless strings,

    J. Isberg, U. Lindstrom, B. Sundborg, and G. Theodoridis, “Classical and quantized tensionless strings,” Nucl. Phys. B411 (1994) 122–156, arXiv:hep-th/9307108. 19

    arXiv 1994

Show all 66 references
  1. [8]

    Tensionless Strings and Galilean Conformal Algebra,

    A. Bagchi, “Tensionless Strings and Galilean Conformal Algebra,” JHEP 05 (2013) 141, arXiv:1303.0291 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Tensionless Strings from Worldsheet Symmetries,

    A. Bagchi, S. Chakrabortty, and P. Parekh, “Tensionless Strings from Worldsheet Symmetries,” JHEP 01 (2016) 158, arXiv:1507.04361 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  3. [10]

    A tale of three — tensionless strings and vacuum structure,

    A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, S. Chakrabortty, S. Dutta, and P. Parekh, “A tale of three — tensionless strings and vacuum structure,” JHEP 04 (2020) 061, arXiv:2001.00354 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Tensionless tales: vacua and critical dimensions,

    A. Bagchi, M. Mandlik, and P. Sharma, “Tensionless tales: vacua and critical dimensions,” JHEP 08 (2021) 054, arXiv:2105.09682 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  5. [12]

    BMS-invariant free scalar model,

    P.-x. Hao, W. Song, X. Xie, and Y. Zhong, “BMS-invariant free scalar model,” Phys. Rev. D105 no. 12, (2022) 125005, arXiv:2111.04701 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Bulk reconstruction in flat holography,

    B. Chen and Z. Hu, “Bulk reconstruction in flat holography,” JHEP 03 (2024) 064, arXiv:2312.13574 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Quantization of Carrollian conformal scalar theories,

    B. Chen, H. Sun, and Y.-f. Zheng, “Quantization of Carrollian conformal scalar theories,” Phys. Rev. D110 no. 12, (2024) 125010, arXiv:2406.17451 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Worldsheet formalism for decoupling limits in string theory,

    J. Gomis and Z. Yan, “Worldsheet formalism for decoupling limits in string theory,” JHEP 07 (2024) 102, arXiv:2311.10565 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Unification of Decoupling Limits in String and M Theory,

    C. D. A. Blair, J. Lahnsteiner, N. A. J. Obers, and Z. Yan, “Unification of Decoupling Limits in String and M Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132 no. 16, (2024) 161603, arXiv:2311.10564 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Strings near black holes are Carrollian. Part II,

    A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, J. Hartong, E. Have, and K. S. Kolekar, “Strings near black holes are Carrollian. Part II,” JHEP 11 (2024) 024, arXiv:2407.12911 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Strings near black holes are Carrollian,

    A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, J. Hartong, E. Have, K. S. Kolekar, and M. Mandlik, “Strings near black holes are Carrollian,” Phys. Rev. D110 no. 8, (2024) 086009, arXiv:2312.14240 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Tensionless Superstrings: View from the Worldsheet,

    A. Bagchi, S. Chakrabortty, and P. Parekh, “Tensionless Superstrings: View from the Worldsheet,” JHEP 10 (2016) 113, arXiv:1606.09628 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Inhomogeneous Tensionless Superstrings,

    A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, S. Chakrabortty, and P. Parekh, “Inhomogeneous Tensionless Superstrings,” JHEP 02 (2018) 065, arXiv:1710.03482 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Exotic Origins of Tensionless Superstrings,

    A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, S. Chakrabortty, and P. Parekh, “Exotic Origins of Tensionless Superstrings,” Phys. Lett. B801 (2020) 135139, arXiv:1811.10877 [hep-th]. 20

    2020 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Tensionless tales of compactification,

    A. Banerjee, R. Chatterjee, and P. Pandit, “Tensionless tales of compactification,” JHEP 09 (2023) 050, arXiv:2307.01275 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Carroll/fracton particles and their correspondence,

    J. Figueroa-O’Farrill, A. P´ erez, and S. Prohazka, “Carroll/fracton particles and their correspondence,” JHEP 06 (2023) 207, arXiv:2305.06730 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Carrollian Physics at the Black Hole Horizon,

    L. Donnay and C. Marteau, “Carrollian Physics at the Black Hole Horizon,” Class. Quant. Grav.36 no. 16, (2019) 165002, arXiv:1903.09654 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Carrollian hydrodynamics and symplectic structure on stretched horizons,

    L. Freidel and P. Jai-akson, “Carrollian hydrodynamics and symplectic structure on stretched horizons,” JHEP 05 (2024) 135, arXiv:2211.06415 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Bridging Carrollian and celestial holography,

    L. Donnay, A. Fiorucci, Y. Herfray, and R. Ruzziconi, “Bridging Carrollian and celestial holography,” Phys. Rev. D107 no. 12, (2023) 126027, arXiv:2212.12553 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Carrollian Conformal Fields and Flat Holography,

    K. Nguyen and P. West, “Carrollian Conformal Fields and Flat Holography,” Universe 9 no. 9, (2023) 385, arXiv:2305.02884 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  21. [29]

    On the ultrarelativistic limit of general relativity,

    G. Dautcourt, “On the ultrarelativistic limit of general relativity,” Acta Phys. Polon. B 29 (1998) 1047–1055, arXiv:gr-qc/9801093

    1998 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Connections and dynamical trajectories in generalised Newton-Cartan gravity II. An ambient perspective,

    X. Bekaert and K. Morand, “Connections and dynamical trajectories in generalised Newton-Cartan gravity II. An ambient perspective,” J. Math. Phys. 59 no. 7, (2018) 072503, arXiv:1505.03739 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Gauging the Carroll Algebra and Ultra-Relativistic Gravity,

    J. Hartong, “Gauging the Carroll Algebra and Ultra-Relativistic Gravity,” JHEP 08 (2015) 069, arXiv:1505.05011 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Carroll versus Galilei Gravity,

    E. Bergshoeff, J. Gomis, B. Rollier, J. Rosseel, and T. ter Veldhuis, “Carroll versus Galilei Gravity,” JHEP 03 (2017) 165, arXiv:1701.06156 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Carroll Expansion of General Relativity,

    D. Hansen, N. A. Obers, G. Oling, and B. T. Søgaard, “Carroll Expansion of General Relativity,” SciPost Phys. 13 no. 3, (2022) 055, arXiv:2112.12684 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Carroll contractions of Lorentz-invariant theories,

    M. Henneaux and P. Salgado-Rebolledo, “Carroll contractions of Lorentz-invariant theories,” JHEP 11 (2021) 180, arXiv:2109.06708 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Asymptotic symmetries in Carrollian theories of gravity with a negative cosmological constant,

    A. P´ erez, “Asymptotic symmetries in Carrollian theories of gravity with a negative cosmological constant,” JHEP 09 (2022) 044, arXiv:2202.08768 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  28. [36]

    The gauging procedure and carrollian gravity,

    J. Figueroa-O’Farrill, E. Have, S. Prohazka, and J. Salzer, “The gauging procedure and carrollian gravity,” JHEP 09 (2022) 243, arXiv:2206.14178 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Magnetic Carrollian gravity from the Carroll algebra,

    A. Campoleoni, M. Henneaux, S. Pekar, A. P´ erez, and P. Salgado-Rebolledo, “Magnetic Carrollian gravity from the Carroll algebra,” JHEP 09 (2022) 127, arXiv:2207.14167 [hep-th]. 21

    2022 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Non-relativistic and ultra-relativistic expansions of three-dimensional spin-3 gravity theories,

    P. Concha, C. Henr ´ ıquez-B´ aez, and E. Rodr ´ ıguez, “Non-relativistic and ultra-relativistic expansions of three-dimensional spin-3 gravity theories,” JHEP 10 (2022) 155, arXiv:2208.01013 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Hamiltonian form of Carroll gravity,

    S. Sengupta, “Hamiltonian form of Carroll gravity,” Phys. Rev. D107 no. 2, (2023) 024010, arXiv:2208.02983 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    p-brane Galilean and Carrollian geometries and gravities,

    E. Bergshoeff, J. Figueroa-O’Farrill, K. van Helden, J. Rosseel, I. Rotko, and T. ter Veldhuis, “p-brane Galilean and Carrollian geometries and gravities,” J. Phys. A 57 no. 24, (2024) 245205, arXiv:2308.12852 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Carroll black holes,

    F. Ecker, D. Grumiller, J. Hartong, A. P´ erez, S. Prohazka, and R. Troncoso, “Carroll black holes,” SciPost Phys. 15 no. 6, (2023) 245, arXiv:2308.10947 [hep-th]

    2023

  34. [42]

    Carroll geodesics,

    L. Ciambelli and D. Grumiller, “Carroll geodesics,” Eur. Phys. J. C84 no. 9, (2024) 933, arXiv:2311.04112 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Carroll stories,

    J. de Boer, J. Hartong, N. A. Obers, W. Sybesma, and S. Vandoren, “Carroll stories,” JHEP 09 (2023) 148, arXiv:2307.06827 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Setting the connection free in the Galilei and Carroll expansions of gravity,

    J. Musaeus, N. A. Obers, and G. Oling, “Setting the connection free in the Galilei and Carroll expansions of gravity,” Phys. Rev. D109 no. 10, (2024) 104040, arXiv:2312.13924 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Carrollian limit of quadratic gravity,

    P. Tadros and I. Kol´ aˇ r, “Carrollian limit of quadratic gravity,”Phys. Rev. D108 no. 12, (2023) 124051, arXiv:2307.13760 [gr-qc]

    2023

  38. [46]

    Uniqueness of Galilean and Carrollian limits of gravitational theories and application to higher derivative gravity,

    P. Tadros and I. Kol´ aˇ r, “Uniqueness of Galilean and Carrollian limits of gravitational theories and application to higher derivative gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 109 no. 8, (2024) 084019, arXiv:2401.00967 [gr-qc]

    2024

  39. [47]

    A primer on Carroll gravity,

    E. March and J. Read, “A primer on Carroll gravity,” arXiv:2409.12200 [physics.hist-ph]

    arXiv

  40. [48]

    Carroll dilaton supergravity in two dimensions,

    D. Grumiller, L. Montecchio, and M. S. Nejati, “Carroll dilaton supergravity in two dimensions,” JHEP 12 (2024) 005, arXiv:2409.17781 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Geodesics in Carrollian Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black holes,

    B. Chen, H. Sun, and J. Xu, “Geodesics in Carrollian Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black holes,” Phys. Rev. D110 no. 12, (2024) 125016, arXiv:2410.20420 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    A Conformal Approach to Carroll Gravity,

    E. A. Bergshoeff, P. Concha, O. Fierro, E. Rodr ´ ıguez, and J. Rosseel, “A Conformal Approach to Carroll Gravity,” arXiv:2412.17752 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  43. [51]

    3D Carrollian gravity from 2D Euclidean symmetry,

    P. Concha, E. Rodr ´ ıguez, and S. Salgado, “3D Carrollian gravity from 2D Euclidean symmetry,” arXiv:2501.00205 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    Free field realization of the BMS Ising model,

    Z.-f. Yu and B. Chen, “Free field realization of the BMS Ising model,” JHEP 08 (2023) 116, arXiv:2211.06926 [hep-th]. 22

    2023 arXiv

  45. [53]

    BMS-invariant free fermion models,

    P.-X. Hao, W. Song, Z. Xiao, and X. Xie, “BMS-invariant free fermion models,” Phys. Rev. D109 no. 2, (2024) 025002, arXiv:2211.06927 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Carroll fermions in two dimensions,

    A. Banerjee, S. Dutta, and S. Mondal, “Carroll fermions in two dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D107 no. 12, (2023) 125020, arXiv:2211.11639 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  47. [55]

    The Zero tension limit of strings and superstrings,

    U. Lindstrom, “The Zero tension limit of strings and superstrings,” in INFN Eloisatron Project: 26th Workshop: From Superstrings to Supergravity, pp. 109–115. 4, 1993. arXiv:hep-th/9303173

    1993 arXiv

  48. [56]

    On higher-dimensional Carrollian and Galilean conformal field theories,

    B. Chen, R. Liu, and Y.-f. Zheng, “On higher-dimensional Carrollian and Galilean conformal field theories,” SciPost Phys. 14 no. 5, (2023) 088, arXiv:2112.10514 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Constructing Carrollian field theories from null reduction,

    B. Chen, R. Liu, H. Sun, and Y.-f. Zheng, “Constructing Carrollian field theories from null reduction,” JHEP 11 (2023) 170, arXiv:2301.06011 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Carrollian approach to 1 + 3D flat holography,

    A. Saha, “Carrollian approach to 1 + 3D flat holography,” JHEP 06 (2023) 051, arXiv:2304.02696 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Polchinski, String theory

    J. Polchinski, String theory. Vol. 1: An introduction to the bosonic string. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 12, 2007

    2007

  52. [60]

    Polchinski, String theory

    J. Polchinski, String theory. Vol. 2: Superstring theory and beyond. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 12, 2007

    2007

  53. [61]

    Tensionless strings in a Kalb-Ramond background,

    A. Banerjee, R. Chatterjee, and P. Pandit, “Tensionless strings in a Kalb-Ramond background,” JHEP 06 (2024) 067, arXiv:2404.01385 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  54. [62]

    On the null origin of the ambitwistor string,

    E. Casali and P. Tourkine, “On the null origin of the ambitwistor string,” JHEP 11 (2016) 036, arXiv:1606.05636 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Windings of twisted strings,

    E. Casali and P. Tourkine, “Windings of twisted strings,” Phys. Rev. D97 no. 6, (2018) 061902, arXiv:1710.01241 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Background Field Method for Nonlinear Sigma Models in Nonrelativistic String Theory,

    Z. Yan and M. Yu, “Background Field Method for Nonlinear Sigma Models in Nonrelativistic String Theory,” JHEP 03 (2020) 181, arXiv:1912.03181 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Nonrelativistic Open String and Yang-Mills Theory,

    J. Gomis, Z. Yan, and M. Yu, “Nonrelativistic Open String and Yang-Mills Theory,” JHEP 03 (2021) 269, arXiv:2007.01886 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Boundary Carrollian CFTs and Open Null Strings,

    A. Bagchi, P. Chakraborty, S. Chakrabortty, S. Fredenhagen, D. Grumiller, and P. Pandit, “Boundary Carrollian CFTs and Open Null Strings,” arXiv:2409.01094 [hep-th]. 23

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.