Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Anomaly Detection for Industrial Applications, Its Challenges, Solutions, and Future Directions: A Review

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This survey organizes vision-based industrial anomaly detection around four pipeline stages — data acquisition, preprocessing, learning mechanisms, evaluation — and uses them to frame the field's challenges, datasets, and future directions.

desk verdict Useful organizational survey of industrial anomaly detection, but the opaque literature selection and a dataset table error keep it from being a reliable reference as-is. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.11310 v1 pith:5BLTPEVM submitted 2025-01-20 cs.CV

Abdelrahman Alzarooni , Ehtesham Iqbal , Samee Ullah Khan , Sajid Javed , Brain Moyo , Yusra Abdulrahman This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords Anomalyinspectioncomputervisiondeeplearningindustrialdefectdetectionneuralnetworksqualitycontrolsensorsdatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Vision-based industrial anomaly detection (IAD) has shifted from human inspection to automated systems that photograph manufactured parts and classify defects. This survey, covering work published since 2019, claims that earlier reviews concentrate on detection models alone and neglect the surrounding pipeline. It therefore builds its review around four pipeline stages — data acquisition, preprocessing, learning mechanisms, and evaluation — and also catalogs popular industrial datasets and open scientific and industrial challenges. A reader who wants to enter the field or situate a particular method gets a structured map of where methods, datasets, and evaluation practices sit relative to each other.

What carries the argument

The carrying structure is the vision-based IAD pipeline itself, defined as four stages: data acquisition, data preprocessing, learning mechanisms, and evaluation. The survey uses this pipeline as a taxonomy: every reviewed method, dataset, and reported score is placed in one of its stages, so the pipeline does the work of showing which parts of the field are well covered and which are thin. Secondary organizing devices are the learning-paradigm split (supervised, unsupervised, semi-supervised) and the dataset comparison table that ties performance claims to specific benchmarks.

What would settle it

Re-run the paper's stated keyword search on the four scientific databases it lists, for 2019 through June 2024, and compare the retrieved set with the papers summarized in the survey's tables; if a large share of relevant vision-based IAD papers is missing, or if the claimed roughly 380% growth in publications does not reproduce, the coverage claim is falsified. A second check is to verify whether each earlier survey the paper lists as limited — for example, restricted to surface defects, unsupervised methods, or single domains — actually has that limitation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is organizational: the published literature on vision-based IAD is best understood not as a stack of competing models but as a four-stage pipeline. Data acquisition (line-scan, multi-view, omnidirectional, and infrared thermographic imaging) sets the limits of what can be seen; preprocessing (grayscale conversion, sharpening, rotation, resizing, thresholding, wavelet transform) prepares raw images for learning; learning mechanisms (from SVM and KNN to CNN, GAN, YOLO, teacher-student, few-shot, and zero-shot vision-language models) carry the classification; and evaluation metrics (precision, accuracy, recall, specificity, F1, AUROC, IOU) decide what counts as success. The survey further claims that this pipeline view exposes challenges other reviews underplay — real-time inspection, small and imbalanced datasets, annotation cost, data quality, and system integration — and that recent benchmarks such as Real-IAD show current models saturating on older datasets.

Load-bearing premise

The survey's usefulness depends on the selection of papers being representative of the field; the authors excluded 'low-ranked journal papers' without defining the ranking criterion or publishing the full list of included papers, so a biased or incomplete selection would make the reported trends and coverage claims unreliable.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Researchers entering the field can use the four-stage pipeline as a checklist for what a complete IAD system must include, rather than focusing only on the model.
  • The survey identifies recurring industrial obstacles — real-time detection, data imbalance, annotation cost, data quality, and system integration — and collects candidate remedies such as edge processing, data augmentation, generative synthesis, and few-shot learning.
  • The reported evaluation scores across applications make plain that no single metric tells the whole story; the metric formulas give practitioners the vocabulary to compare methods fairly.
  • The dataset summary shows a trajectory from small single-defect datasets like KSDD to large multi-view benchmarks like Real-IAD, where state-of-the-art image AUROC drops from 97.9% on MVTec AD to 85% on Real-IAD, indicating that older benchmarks are nearing saturation.
  • Future directions named by the paper — explainable AI and large vision-language models — point toward inspection systems that can justify their decisions and work with little or no labeled defect data.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The pipeline framing implies that evaluation practice is a weak link: many summarized papers report only one or two metrics on a single dataset, so cross-paper comparisons are fragile; a testable extension would be a standardized evaluation protocol spanning all four pipeline stages.
  • Emphasis on data acquisition suggests that IAD progress may be bottlenecked more by sensing and annotation than by model architecture; a plausible extension is that cheaper multi-view and infrared imaging plus generative synthesis of labeled defects could advance the field faster than new loss functions.
  • The saturation of MVTec AD and KSDD implied by recent results suggests that benchmarks with domain shift and logical anomalies (AeBAD, MVTec LOCO AD, Real-IAD) will become the new standard, and re-ranking existing methods on these harder benchmarks would be a direct test.
  • The vision-language future direction implies that zero-shot detection could drastically cut annotation cost; one could test whether LVLM-based detectors keep their advantage on rare, tail-case defects rather than frequent patterns.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a survey of vision-based industrial anomaly detection (IAD) that reviews literature published from 2019 onward. It organizes the field around four pipeline components that the authors claim are under-covered in prior surveys: data acquisition, preprocessing, learning mechanisms, and evaluation. It also discusses scientific and industrial challenges, summarizes popular datasets, and outlines future directions such as explainable AI and vision-language models. The paper positions itself as a reference for researchers and practitioners entering or working in industrial visual inspection.

Significance. If its coverage is reliable, this survey would be a useful entry point for the IAD community: it consolidates a wide range of recent references, gives a clear pipeline-oriented structure, and includes practical industrial considerations such as edge processing and real-time constraints. The paper explicitly names the overlooked pipeline components in its contributions and provides a dataset table that practitioners often need. A notable strength is the breadth of collected application scenarios, from PCB and aero-engine inspection to agricultural and bridge defect detection, which gives the survey interdisciplinary reach. However, the survey's utility as a reference depends on the reproducibility of its literature selection and on the accuracy of its dataset summaries, both of which are currently problematic.

major comments (2)
  1. [§I-B and Figure 5] The literature selection procedure is not reproducible, which undermines the central coverage claim. Section I-B states that 'low-ranked journal papers were excluded from the final selection' but does not define the ranking criterion (e.g., journal quartile, impact factor, or a specific list). No complete list of included papers, no PRISMA-style screening flow, and no counts of retrieved, screened, and excluded records are given. Consequently, the quantitative claim of 'nearly 380%' growth from 2019 to 2023 and the yearly counts in Figure 5 cannot be independently verified. The authors should specify the ranking rule, provide the full list of included studies (e.g., in a supplementary file), and report screening statistics so that the trend and the coverage claims can be audited.
  2. [§V and Table VI] Table VI contains an internal inconsistency with Section V for the MVTec AD dataset. The text states that the testing bank includes 1258 defect images, while Table VI lists 'Defective images' as 1725. The number 1725 is actually the total test-set size (1258 defective plus 467 non-defective), so the column label is misleading. Similar issues may affect other rows: for KSDD2, the description in Table VI says the training set has '246 and 2085 images respectively' and the testing set has '110 and 894 images respectively,' yet the table's totals are 2979 non-defective and 356 defective, which do not correspond to those breakdowns. Because the dataset summary is one of the paper's stated contributions, each row must be reconciled with the original dataset papers and the sources should be cited per row.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§I-A2] The statement that self-supervised learning 'does not require a loss function' is incorrect; self-supervised methods typically optimize pretext-task losses (e.g., contrastive or reconstruction losses).
  2. [§IV-C, GAN paragraph] The description of GANs includes 'The algorithm generates region proposals in an image and uses CNN to classify each proposal,' which describes an R-CNN-style detector rather than a generative adversarial network; this should be corrected to avoid confusing readers.
  3. [§III-A, small defects bullet] The text defines a low false positive rate as 'dealing with the number of defective instances being incorrectly classified as non-defective'; this is actually a false negative, not a false positive. The definition should be fixed.
  4. [§II, Figure 7 caption] Figure 7 refers to a 'highly cited survey' identified with a red flag, but no citation threshold or basis for that designation is given; please clarify or remove the qualifier.
  5. [General] Several passages in the learning-mechanisms section read as textbook definitions (e.g., SVM, KNN, decision trees) without tying them to the surveyed IAD literature; adding a summary table linking each algorithm to representative industrial applications would strengthen the survey's utility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the survey's descriptive claims rest on external literature, not on self-referential derivation.

full rationale

This manuscript is a literature review, not a derivation. It contains no fitted parameters, no predictive equations, and no formal result that could reduce to its own inputs. The selection procedure in Section I-B (keyword search followed by exclusion of low-ranked journals) is a methodological choice; the undefined ranking criterion affects reproducibility of the corpus but is not a circularity. The paper's own prior works that appear in the reference list, e.g., [23] (aero-engine blade defect detection review), [53] (AI-blockchain systems), and [107] (multi-scale feature reconstruction network), are used only as surveyed examples in Tables I, II, and V or as contextual citations, not as premises that force a conclusion. No 'uniqueness theorem' or similar imported result is invoked. The claim that data acquisition, preprocessing, learning mechanisms, and evaluation are 'overlooked' in prior surveys is an external comparative claim about other papers and can be checked against those papers, so it is not circular. The noted discrepancy between the MVTec AD defect-image count in Section V (1258) and Table VI (1725) is an internal consistency issue, not a circularity. Accordingly, no circular step is exhibited and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review introduces no free parameters, axioms beyond the standard assumptions of a literature selection, or invented entities. Its claims rest entirely on the prior literature it cites.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Keyword search on four databases with exclusion of low-ranked journals yields a representative selection of IAD publications.
    Section I-B defines the search strategy but not the journal ranking criteria, and the full list of selected papers is omitted, so representativeness is assumed.
  • domain assumption Reported performance scores from the reviewed papers are accurate as published.
    Tables II, III, and V reproduce scores from original papers without re-evaluation; if those scores are questionable, the survey's comparative statements inherit the issue.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Anomaly Detection for Industrial Applications, Its Challenges, Solutions, and Future Directions: A Review." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5BLTPEVM

@misc{pith2026250111310,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Anomaly Detection for Industrial Applications, Its Challenges, Solutions, and Future Directions: A Review},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5BLTPEVM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.11310}
}
read the original abstract

Anomaly detection from images captured using camera sensors is one of the mainstream applications at the industrial level. Particularly, it maintains the quality and optimizes the efficiency in production processes across diverse industrial tasks, including advanced manufacturing and aerospace engineering. Traditional anomaly detection workflow is based on a manual inspection by human operators, which is a tedious task. Advances in intelligent automated inspection systems have revolutionized the Industrial Anomaly Detection (IAD) process. Recent vision-based approaches can automatically extract, process, and interpret features using computer vision and align with the goals of automation in industrial operations. In light of the shift in inspection methodologies, this survey reviews studies published since 2019, with a specific focus on vision-based anomaly detection. The components of an IAD pipeline that are overlooked in existing surveys are presented, including areas related to data acquisition, preprocessing, learning mechanisms, and evaluation. In addition to the collected publications, several scientific and industry-related challenges and their perspective solutions are highlighted. Popular and relevant industrial datasets are also summarized, providing further insight into inspection applications. Finally, future directions of vision-based IAD are discussed, offering researchers insight into the state-of-the-art of industrial inspection.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.11310 by the authors.

Figure 11
Figure 11. Additionally, creating reliable datasets is challenging [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PB-IAD: Utilizing multimodal foundation models for semantic industrial anomaly detection in dynamic manufacturing environments

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    With carefully layered prompts and one or three reference samples, GPT-4.1 detects anomalies in cable images and crimp-force features at F1 levels that PatchCore and Isolation Forest reach only after training on dozen...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

132 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Image-based surface defect detection using deep learning: A review,

    P. Bhatt, R. Malhan, P. Rajendran, B. Shah, S. Thakar, Y . J. Yoon, and S. Gupta, “Image-based surface defect detection using deep learning: A review,”Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, vol. 21, pp. 1–23, 01 2021

    2021

  2. [2]

    State of the art in defect detection based on machine vision,

    Z. Ren, F. Fang, N. Yan, and Y . Wu, “State of the art in defect detection based on machine vision,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, vol. 9, p. 661–691, 03 2022

    2022

  3. [3]

    Industrial defect detection through computer vision: A survey,

    Y . Tang, K. Sun, D. Zhao, Y . Lu, J. Jiang, and H. Chen, “Industrial defect detection through computer vision: A survey,” in 2022 7th IEEE International Conference on Data Science in Cyberspace (DSC) , 2022, pp. 605–610

    2022

  4. [4]

    China’s manufacturing locus in 2025: With a comparison of “made-in-china 2025

    L. Li, “China’s manufacturing locus in 2025: With a comparison of “made-in-china 2025” and “industry 4.0”,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change , vol. 135, pp. 66–74, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162517307254

    2025

  5. [5]

    Salgues, Society 5.0: industry of the future, technologies, methods and tools

    B. Salgues, Society 5.0: industry of the future, technologies, methods and tools. John Wiley and Sons, 2018

    2018

  6. [6]

    Recent advances in industrial internet: insights and challenges,

    W. Qin, S. Chen, and M. Peng, “Recent advances in industrial internet: insights and challenges,” Digital Communications and Networks, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352864819301166

    2020

  7. [7]

    The literature review of manufacturing industry 4.0 using mapping design with gis approach,

    C. H. G. Qing, E. Oktaviani, and S. Heripracoyo, “The literature review of manufacturing industry 4.0 using mapping design with gis approach,” in 2019 International Conference on Information Manage- ment and Technology (ICIMTech), vol. 1, 2019, pp. 438–443

    2019

  8. [8]

    Md-yolo: Surface defect detector for industrial complex environments,

    H. Zheng, X. Chen, H. Cheng, Y . Du, and Z. Jiang, “Md-yolo: Surface defect detector for industrial complex environments,” Optics and Lasers in Engineering , vol. 178, p. 108170, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143816624001490

    2024

Show all 132 references
  1. [9]

    Smart manufacturing,

    A. Kusiak, “Smart manufacturing,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 56, no. 1-2, pp. 508–517, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1351644

    2018

  2. [10]

    Visual computing as a key enabling technology for industrie 4.0 and industrial internet,

    J. Posada, C. Toro, I. Barandiaran, D. Oyarzun, D. Stricker, R. de Ami- cis, E. B. Pinto, P. Eisert, J. D¨ollner, and I. Vallarino, “Visual computing as a key enabling technology for industrie 4.0 and industrial internet,” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications , vol. 35, no....

    2015

  3. [11]

    Automated visual defect detection for flat steel surface: A survey,

    Q. Luo, X. Fang, L. Liu, C. Yang, and Y . Sun, “Automated visual defect detection for flat steel surface: A survey,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement , vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 626–644, 2020

    2020

  4. [12]

    Machine learning for industrial applications: A comprehensive literature review,

    M. Bertolini, D. Mezzogori, M. Neroni, and F. Zammori, “Machine learning for industrial applications: A comprehensive literature review,” Expert Systems with Applications , vol. 175, p. 114820, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0957...

    2021

  5. [13]

    Deep learning for automatic vision-based recognition of industrial surface defects: A survey,

    M. Prunella, R. M. Scardigno, D. Buongiorno, A. Brunetti, N. Longo, R. Carli, M. Dotoli, and V . Bevilacqua, “Deep learning for automatic vision-based recognition of industrial surface defects: A survey,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 43 370–43 423, 2023

    2023

  6. [14]

    Application of supervised machine learning for defect detection during metallic powder bed fusion additive manufacturing using high resolution imaging

    C. Gobert, E. W. Reutzel, J. Petrich, A. R. Nassar, and S. Phoha, “Application of supervised machine learning for defect detection during metallic powder bed fusion additive manufacturing using high resolution imaging.” Additive Manufacturing , vol. 21, pp. 517–528, 2018. [Onl...

    2018

  7. [15]

    C. Ding, G. Pang, and C. Shen, “Catching both gray and black ALZAROONI et al.: ANOMAL Y DETECTION FOR INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS, ITS CHALLENGES, SOLUTIONS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS: A REVIEW 15 swans: Open-set supervised anomaly detection,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference...

    2022

  8. [16]

    Defect detection in atomic-resolution images via unsupervised learning with translational invariance,

    Y . Guo, S. Kalinin, H. Cai, K. Xiao, S. Krylyuk, A. Davydov, Q. Guo, and A. Lupini, “Defect detection in atomic-resolution images via unsupervised learning with translational invariance,”npj Computational Materials, vol. 7, 12 2021

    2021

  9. [17]

    Contrastive self-supervised representation learning framework for metal surface defect detection,

    M. Zabin, A. N. B. Kabir, M. K. Kabir, H.-J. Choi, and J. Uddin, “Contrastive self-supervised representation learning framework for metal surface defect detection,” Journal of Big Data , vol. 10, no. 1, p. 145, 2023

    2023

  10. [18]

    Automatic defect classification using semi-supervised learning with defect localization,

    Y . Kim, J.-S. Lee, and J.-H. Lee, “Automatic defect classification using semi-supervised learning with defect localization,” IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing , vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 476–485, 2023

    2023

  11. [19]

    Efficient and accurate semi-supervised semantic segmentation for industrial surface defects,

    C. Shi, K. Wang, G. Zhang, Z. Li, and C. Zhu, “Efficient and accurate semi-supervised semantic segmentation for industrial surface defects,” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 21874, 2024

    2024

  12. [20]

    Deep learning methods for object detection in smart manufacturing: A survey,

    H. M. Ahmad and A. Rahimi, “Deep learning methods for object detection in smart manufacturing: A survey,” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 64, pp. 181–196, 2022. [Online]. Available: https: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278612522001066

    2022

  13. [21]

    Deep learning for unsupervised anomaly localization in industrial images: A survey,

    X. Tao, X. Gong, X. Zhang, S. Yan, and C. Adak, “Deep learning for unsupervised anomaly localization in industrial images: A survey,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement , vol. 71, pp. 1–21, 2022

    2022

  14. [22]

    Aircraft visual inspection: A systematic literature review,

    Y . D. Yasuda, F. A. Cappabianco, L. E. G. Martins, and J. A. Gripp, “Aircraft visual inspection: A systematic literature review,” Computers in Industry, vol. 141, p. 103695, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166361522000926

    2022

  15. [23]

    Aero-engine blade defect detection: A systematic review of deep learning models,

    Y . Abdulrahman, M. A. M. Eltoum, A. Ayyad, B. Moyo, and Y . Zweiri, “Aero-engine blade defect detection: A systematic review of deep learning models,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 53 048–53 061, 2023

    2023

  16. [24]

    A technology maturity assessment framework for industry 5.0 machine vision systems based on systematic literature review in automotive manufacturing,

    F. K. Konstantinidis, N. Myrillas, K. A. Tsintotas, S. G. Mouroutsos, and A. Gasteratos, “A technology maturity assessment framework for industry 5.0 machine vision systems based on systematic literature review in automotive manufacturing,” International Journal of Production ...

    2023

  17. [25]

    Deep cnn-based visual defect detection: Survey of current literature,

    S. B. Jha and R. F. Babiceanu, “Deep cnn-based visual defect detection: Survey of current literature,” Computers in Industry , vol. 148, p. 103911, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0166361523000611

    2023

  18. [26]

    Deep industrial image anomaly detection: A survey,

    J. Liu, G. Xie, J. Wang, S. Li, C. Wang, F. Zheng, and Y . Jin, “Deep industrial image anomaly detection: A survey,” Machine Intelligence Research, vol. 21, no. 1, p. 104–135, Jan. 2024. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11633-023-1459-z

    2024 doi

  19. [27]

    A systematic review of deep learning approaches for surface defect detection in industrial applications,

    R. Ameri, C.-C. Hsu, and S. S. Band, “A systematic review of deep learning approaches for surface defect detection in industrial applications,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence , vol. 130, p. 107717, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect. com/...

    2024

  20. [28]

    Self-supervised anomaly detection in computer vision and beyond: A survey and outlook,

    H. Hojjati, T. K. K. Ho, and N. Armanfard, “Self-supervised anomaly detection in computer vision and beyond: A survey and outlook,” Neural Networks , vol. 172, p. 106106, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0893608024000200

    2024

  21. [29]

    Anomaly detection based on artificial intelligence of things: A systematic literature mapping,

    S. Trilles, S. S. Hammad, and D. Iskandaryan, “Anomaly detection based on artificial intelligence of things: A systematic literature mapping,” Internet of Things , vol. 25, p. 101063, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S2542660524000052

    2024

  22. [30]

    Real-time defect detection in electronic components during assembly through deep learning,

    E. Weiss, S. Caplan, K. Horn, and M. Sharabi, “Real-time defect detection in electronic components during assembly through deep learning,” Electronics, vol. 13, no. 8, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/13/8/1551

    2024

  23. [31]

    A lightweight deep- learning algorithm for welding defect detection in new energy vehicle battery current collectors,

    L. Yuan, Y . Chen, H. Tang, R. Gao, and W. Wu, “A lightweight deep- learning algorithm for welding defect detection in new energy vehicle battery current collectors,” IEEE Sensors Journal , vol. 24, no. 13, pp. 21 655–21 668, 2024

    2024

  24. [32]

    A comprehensive survey on machine learning driven material defect detection: Challenges, solutions, and future prospects,

    J. Bai, D. Wu, T. Shelley, P. Schubel, D. Twine, J. Russell, X. Zeng, and J. Zhang, “A comprehensive survey on machine learning driven material defect detection: Challenges, solutions, and future prospects,”

  25. [33]

    X. Dong, C. Taylor, and T. Cootes, Small Defect Detection Using Convolutional Neural Network Features and Random Forests. United States: Springer Nature, 2019, vol. 11132, pp. 398–412

    2019

  26. [34]

    A novel weakly supervised ensemble learning framework for automated pixel-wise industry anomaly detection,

    S. Mei, J. Cheng, X. He, H. Hu, and G. Wen, “A novel weakly supervised ensemble learning framework for automated pixel-wise industry anomaly detection,” IEEE Sensors Journal , vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 1560–1570, 2022

    2022

  27. [35]

    Bigdatasetgan: Synthesizing imagenet with pixel-wise annotations,

    D. Li, H. Ling, S. W. Kim, K. Kreis, S. Fidler, and A. Torralba, “Bigdatasetgan: Synthesizing imagenet with pixel-wise annotations,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022, pp. 21 330–21 340

    2022

  28. [36]

    Defectgan: Synthetic data generation for emu defects detection with limited data,

    S. Liu, H. Ni, C. Li, Y . Zou, and Y . Luo, “Defectgan: Synthetic data generation for emu defects detection with limited data,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 17 638–17 652, 2024

    2024

  29. [37]

    Meta-transfer learning for few-shot learning,

    Q. Sun, Y . Liu, T.-S. Chua, and B. Schiele, “Meta-transfer learning for few-shot learning,” in 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , 2019, pp. 403–412

    2019

  30. [38]

    Challenges, opportunities and future directions of smart manufacturing: A state of art review,

    S. Phuyal, D. Bista, and R. Bista, “Challenges, opportunities and future directions of smart manufacturing: A state of art review,” Sustainable Futures , vol. 2, p. 100023, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188820300162

    2020

  31. [39]

    Transfer learning methods for fractographic detection of fatigue crack initiation in additive manufac- turing,

    O. H. Anidjar, R. Lang, and M. Mega, “Transfer learning methods for fractographic detection of fatigue crack initiation in additive manufac- turing,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 6262–6280, 2024

    2024

  32. [40]

    A nondestructive automatic defect detection method with pixelwise segmentation,

    L. Yang, J. Fan, B. Huo, E. Li, and Y . Liu, “A nondestructive automatic defect detection method with pixelwise segmentation,” Knowledge- Based Systems , vol. 242, p. 108338, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950705122001241

    2022

  33. [41]

    Auto-annotated deep segmentation for surface defect detection,

    D.-M. Tsai, S.-K. S. Fan, and Y .-H. Chou, “Auto-annotated deep segmentation for surface defect detection,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement , vol. 70, pp. 1–10, 2021

    2021

  34. [42]

    Deep semi-supervised anomaly detection,

    L. Ruff, R. A. Vandermeulen, N. G ¨ornitz, A. Binder, E. M ¨uller, K.- R. M ¨uller, and M. Kloft, “Deep semi-supervised anomaly detection,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.02694 , 2019

    1906 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Image-based defect detection in lithium-ion battery electrode using convolutional neural networks,

    O. Badmos, A. Kopp, T. Bernthaler, and G. Schneider, “Image-based defect detection in lithium-ion battery electrode using convolutional neural networks,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing , vol. 31, pp. 885–897, 2020

    2020

  36. [44]

    Defect classification and detection using a multitask deep one-class cnn,

    X. Dong, C. J. Taylor, and T. F. Cootes, “Defect classification and detection using a multitask deep one-class cnn,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering , vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1719–1730, 2022

    2022

  37. [45]

    Surface defect detection of industrial components based on improved yolov5s,

    L. Liu, X. Feng, F. Li, Q. Xian, Z. Chen, and Z. Jia, “Surface defect detection of industrial components based on improved yolov5s,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 24, no. 15, pp. 23 940–23 950, 2024

    2024

  38. [46]

    A real-time automated defect detection system for ceramic pieces manufacturing process based on computer vision with deep learning,

    E. Cumbajin, N. Rodrigues, P. Costa, R. Miragaia, L. Fraz ˜ao, N. Costa, A. Fern ´andez-Caballero, J. Carneiro, L. H. Buruberri, and A. Pereira, “A real-time automated defect detection system for ceramic pieces manufacturing process based on computer vision with deep learning,...

    2024

  39. [47]

    Sewer pipeline fault identification using anomaly detection algorithms on video sequences,

    X. Fang, W. Guo, Q. Li, J. Zhu, Z. Chen, J. Yu, B. Zhou, and H. Yang, “Sewer pipeline fault identification using anomaly detection algorithms on video sequences,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 39 574–39 586, 2020

    2020

  40. [48]

    A generic semi-supervised deep learning-based approach for automated surface inspection,

    X. Zheng, H. Wang, J. Chen, Y . Kong, and S. Zheng, “A generic semi-supervised deep learning-based approach for automated surface inspection,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 114 088–114 099, 2020

    2020

  41. [49]

    Deep learning based online metallic surface defect detection method for wire and arc additive manufacturing,

    W. Li, H. Zhang, G. Wang, G. Xiong, M. Zhao, G. Li, and R. Li, “Deep learning based online metallic surface defect detection method for wire and arc additive manufacturing,” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 80, p. 102470, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://...

    2023

  42. [50]

    Image based quality inspection in smart manufacturing systems: A literature review,

    M. Babic, M. A. Farahani, and T. Wuest, “Image based quality inspection in smart manufacturing systems: A literature review,” Procedia CIRP , vol. 103, pp. 262–267, 2021, 9th CIRP Global Web Conference – Sustainable, resilient, and agile manufacturing and service operations : ...

    2021

  43. [51]

    Identification and classi- fication of materials using machine vision and machine learning in the context of industry 4.0,

    D. Prasad, M. Sreekumar, and P. Karumbu, “Identification and classi- fication of materials using machine vision and machine learning in the context of industry 4.0,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing , vol. 31, 06 2020

    2020

  44. [52]

    A cascading fuzzy logic with image processing algorithm–based defect detection for automatic visual inspection of industrial cylindrical object’s surface,

    M. Ali and A. Lun, “A cascading fuzzy logic with image processing algorithm–based defect detection for automatic visual inspection of industrial cylindrical object’s surface,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 102, 05 2019

    2019

  45. [53]

    Ai-blockchain systems in aerospace engineering and management: Review and chal- lenges,

    Y . Abdulrahman, V . Parezanovic, and D. Svetinovic, “Ai-blockchain systems in aerospace engineering and management: Review and chal- lenges,” in 2022 30th Telecommunications Forum (TELFOR) . IEEE, 2022, pp. 1–4

    2022

  46. [54]

    A systematic review of machine-vision-based leather surface defect 16 IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, VOL. XX, NO. XX, XXXX 2024 inspection,

    Z. Chen, J. Deng, Q. Zhu, H. Wang, and Y . Chen, “A systematic review of machine-vision-based leather surface defect 16 IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, VOL. XX, NO. XX, XXXX 2024 inspection,” Electronics, vol. 11, no. 15, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/11/15/2383

    2024

  47. [55]

    Multi-view surface inspection using a rotating table,

    T. Kaichi, S. Mori, H. Saito, J. Sugano, and H. Adachi, “Multi-view surface inspection using a rotating table,” Electronic Imaging , vol. 2018, pp. 1–5, 01 2018

    2018

  48. [56]

    Multi-view damage inspection using single-view damage projection,

    R. Ruitenbeek and S. Bhulai, “Multi-view damage inspection using single-view damage projection,” Machine Vision and Applications , vol. 33, 05 2022

    2022

  49. [57]

    Omnidirectional vision,

    S. K. Nayar, “Omnidirectional vision,” in Robotics Research, Y . Shirai and S. Hirose, Eds. London: Springer London, 1998, pp. 195–202

    1998

  50. [58]

    Omnidirectional imaging sensor based on conical mirror for pipelines,

    P. Zhang, F. Zhou, X. Wang, S. Wang, and Z. Song, “Omnidirectional imaging sensor based on conical mirror for pipelines,” Optics and Lasers in Engineering , vol. 175, p. 108003, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143816623005328

    2024

  51. [59]

    Automatic detection and identification of defects by deep learning algorithms from pulsed thermography data,

    Q. Fang, C. Ibarra-Castanedo, I. Garrido, Y . Duan, and X. Maldague, “Automatic detection and identification of defects by deep learning algorithms from pulsed thermography data,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 9, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/ 23/9/4444

    2023

  52. [60]

    Progress in active infrared imaging for defect detection in the renewable and electronic industries,

    X. Zhao, Y . Zhao, S. Hu, H. Wang, Y . Zhang, and W. Ming, “Progress in active infrared imaging for defect detection in the renewable and electronic industries,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 21, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/21/8780

    2023

  53. [61]

    Infrared imaging of photovoltaic modules a review of the state of the art and future challenges facing gigawatt photovoltaic power stations,

    C. Buerhop, L. Bommes, J. Schlipf, T. Pickel, A. Fladung, and I. M. Peters, “Infrared imaging of photovoltaic modules a review of the state of the art and future challenges facing gigawatt photovoltaic power stations,” Progress in Energy, vol. 4, 08 2022

    2022

  54. [62]

    Laser-induced thermography: An effective detection approach for multiple-type defects of printed circuit boards (pcbs) multilayer complex structure,

    F. Wang, Y . Zhou, X. Zhang, Z. Li, J. Weng, G. Qiang, M. Chen, Y . Wang, H. Yue, and J. Liu, “Laser-induced thermography: An effective detection approach for multiple-type defects of printed circuit boards (pcbs) multilayer complex structure,” Measurement, vol. 206, p. 112307...

    2023

  55. [63]

    The need for precision lighting control in machine vision,

    J. Hudson, “The need for precision lighting control in machine vision,” 05 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.novuslight.com/ the-need-for-precision-lighting-control-in-machine-vision N8017. html

    2018

  56. [64]

    3d vision: Mvtec software

    “3d vision: Mvtec software.” [Online]. Available: https://www.mvtec. com/technologies/3d-vision

  57. [65]

    An omnidirectional vision sensor based on a spherical mirror catadioptric system,

    S. Barone, M. Carulli, P. Neri, A. Paoli, and A. V . Razionale, “An omnidirectional vision sensor based on a spherical mirror catadioptric system,” Sensors, vol. 18, no. 2, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/18/2/408

    2018

  58. [66]

    Infrared thermography for condition monitoring – a review,

    S. Bagavathiappan, B. Lahiri, T. Saravanan, J. Philip, and T. Jayakumar, “Infrared thermography for condition monitoring – a review,” Infrared Physics and Technology, vol. 60, pp. 35–55, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350449513000327

    2013

  59. [67]

    Color image to grayscale image conversion,

    C. Saravanan, “Color image to grayscale image conversion,” in 2010 Second International Conference on Computer Engineering and Appli- cations, vol. 2, 2010, pp. 196–199

    2010

  60. [68]

    Crack defect detection processing algorithm and method of mems devices based on image processing technology,

    Y . Zheng, S. Li, Y . Xiang, and Z. Zhu, “Crack defect detection processing algorithm and method of mems devices based on image processing technology,” IEEE Access , vol. 11, pp. 126 323–126 334, 2023

    2023

  61. [69]

    Exploring deep learning and machine learning approaches for brain hemorrhage detection,

    S. Ahmed, J. F. Esha, M. S. Rahman, M. S. Kaiser, A. S. M. S. Hosen, D. Ghimire, and M. J. Park, “Exploring deep learning and machine learning approaches for brain hemorrhage detection,” IEEE Access , vol. 12, pp. 45 060–45 093, 2024

    2024

  62. [70]

    Automatic thresholding for defect detection,

    H.-F. Ng, “Automatic thresholding for defect detection,” Pattern Recognition Letters , vol. 27, no. 14, pp. 1644–1649, 2006. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S016786550600119X

    2006

  63. [71]

    Novel image processing method inspired by wavelet transform,

    F. Uesugi, “Novel image processing method inspired by wavelet transform,” Micron, vol. 168, p. 103442, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968432823000409

    2023

  64. [72]

    A comprehensive survey on support vector machine classification: Applications, challenges and trends,

    J. Cervantes, F. Garcia-Lamont, L. Rodr ´ıguez-Mazahua, and A. Lopez, “A comprehensive survey on support vector machine classification: Applications, challenges and trends,” Neurocomputing, vol. 408, pp. 189–215, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ scienc...

    2020

  65. [73]

    A brief review of nearest neighbor algorithm for learning and classification,

    K. Taunk, S. De, S. Verma, and A. Swetapadma, “A brief review of nearest neighbor algorithm for learning and classification,” in 2019 International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICCS), 2019, pp. 1255–1260

    2019

  66. [74]

    Naive bayes: applications, variations and vulnerabilities: a review of literature with code snippets for implementation indika,

    I. Wickramasinghe and H. Kalutarage, “Naive bayes: applications, variations and vulnerabilities: a review of literature with code snippets for implementation indika,” Soft Computing, vol. 24, 02 2021

    2021

  67. [75]

    Decision tree algorithm in machine learning,

    Y . Lu, T. Ye, and J. Zheng, “Decision tree algorithm in machine learning,” in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Advances in Electrical Engineering and Computer Applications (AEECA) , 2022, pp. 1014–1017

    2022

  68. [76]

    Random Forests,

    L. Breiman, “Random Forests,” Machine Learning , vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 5–32, Oct. 2001. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1023/A: 1010933404324

    2001 doi

  69. [77]

    Convolutional neural networks: an overview and application in radiology,

    R. Yamashita, M. Nishio, R. Do, and K. Togashi, “Convolutional neural networks: an overview and application in radiology,” Insights into Imaging, vol. 9, 06 2018

    2018

  70. [78]

    A survey of defect detection applications based on generative adversarial networks,

    X. He, Z. Chang, L. Zhang, H. Xu, H. Chen, and Z. Luo, “A survey of defect detection applications based on generative adversarial networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 113 493–113 512, 2022

    2022

  71. [79]

    You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection,

    J. Redmon, S. Divvala, R. Girshick, and A. Farhadi, “You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection,” in 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016, pp. 779–788

    2016

  72. [80]

    A review of yolo algorithm developments,

    P. Jiang, D. Ergu, F. Liu, Y . Cai, and B. Ma, “A review of yolo algorithm developments,” Procedia Computer Science , vol. 199, pp. 1066–1073, 2022, the 8th International Conference on Information Technology and Quantitative Management (ITQM 2020 and 2021): Developing Global D...

    2022

  73. [81]

    Research on real-time detection system of rail surface defects based on deep learning,

    W. Yaodong, Y . Hang, G. Baoqing, S. Hongmei, and Y . Zujun, “Research on real-time detection system of rail surface defects based on deep learning,” IEEE Sensors Journal , vol. 24, no. 13, pp. 21 157– 21 167, 2024

    2024

  74. [82]

    Casdd: Automatic surface defect detection using a complementary adversarial network,

    S. Tian, P. Huang, H. Ma, J. Wang, X. Zhou, S. Zhang, J. Zhou, R. Huang, and Y . Li, “Casdd: Automatic surface defect detection using a complementary adversarial network,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 22, no. 20, pp. 19 583–19 595, 2022

    2022

  75. [83]

    Deep residual learning for image recognition,

    K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, “Deep residual learning for image recognition,” in 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016, pp. 770–778

    2016

  76. [84]

    Learning from few examples: A summary of approaches to few-shot learning,

    A. Parnami and M. Lee, “Learning from few examples: A summary of approaches to few-shot learning,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2203.04291,

    arXiv

  77. [85]

    Few-shot steel surface defect detection,

    H. Wang, Z. Li, and H. Wang, “Few-shot steel surface defect detection,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement , vol. 71, pp. 1–12, 2022

    2022

  78. [86]

    Winclip: Zero-/few-shot anomaly classification and segmentation,

    J. Jeong, Y . Zou, T. Kim, D. Zhang, A. Ravichandran, and O. Dabeer, “Winclip: Zero-/few-shot anomaly classification and segmentation,” in 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recog- nition (CVPR), 2023, pp. 19 606–19 616

    2023

  79. [87]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision,

    A. Radford, J. W. Kim, C. Hallacy, A. Ramesh, G. Goh, S. Agarwal, G. Sastry, A. Askell, P. Mishkin, J. Clark, G. Krueger, and I. Sutskever, “Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https: //arxiv.org/abs/2103.00020

    2021 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Towards total recall in industrial anomaly detection,

    K. Roth, L. Pemula, J. Zepeda, B. Sch ¨olkopf, T. Brox, and P. Gehler, “Towards total recall in industrial anomaly detection,” in 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2022, pp. 14 298–14 308

    2022

  81. [89]

    Distilling the knowledge in a neural network,

    G. E. Hinton, O. Vinyals, and J. Dean, “Distilling the knowledge in a neural network,” ArXiv, vol. abs/1503.02531, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:7200347

    2015 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Teacher-student architecture for knowledge distillation: A survey,

    C. Hu, X. Li, D. Liu, H. Wu, X. Chen, J. Wang, and X. Liu, “Teacher-student architecture for knowledge distillation: A survey,”

  83. [91]

    Uninformed students: Student-teacher anomaly detection with discriminative latent embeddings,

    P. Bergmann, M. Fauser, D. Sattlegger, and C. Steger, “Uninformed students: Student-teacher anomaly detection with discriminative latent embeddings,” in 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2020, pp. 4182–4191

    2020

  84. [92]

    Softpatch: Unsupervised anomaly detection with noisy data,

    X. Jiang, J. Liu, J. Wang, Q. Nie, K. Wu, Y . Liu, C. Wang, and F. Zheng, “Softpatch: Unsupervised anomaly detection with noisy data,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 35, pp. 15 433–15 445, 2022

    2022

  85. [93]

    Automatic industry pcb board dip process defect detection system based on deep ensemble self-adaption method,

    Y .-T. Li, P. Kuo, and J.-I. Guo, “Automatic industry pcb board dip process defect detection system based on deep ensemble self-adaption method,” IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufac- turing Technology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 312–323, 2021

    2021

  86. [94]

    Augmented hybrid learning for visual defect inspection in real-world hydrogen storage manufacturing scenarios,

    Y . Chu, Y . He, X. Xiong, Y . Lou, C. Yu, and L. Duan, “Augmented hybrid learning for visual defect inspection in real-world hydrogen storage manufacturing scenarios,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 8477–8487, 2024

    2024

  87. [95]

    Cannizzaro, A

    D. Cannizzaro, A. G. Varrella, S. Paradiso, R. Sampieri, Y . Chen, A. Macii, E. Patti, and S. D. Cataldo, “In-situ defect detection of metal ALZAROONI et al.: ANOMAL Y DETECTION FOR INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS, ITS CHALLENGES, SOLUTIONS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS: A REVIEW 17 additive...

    2022

  88. [96]

    Segmentation-based deep-learning approach for surface-defect detection,

    D. Tabernik, S. ˇSela, J. Skvar ˇc, and D. Sko ˇcaj, “Segmentation-based deep-learning approach for surface-defect detection,” Journal of Intel- ligent Manufacturing, 05 2019

    2019

  89. [97]

    Towards real-time in-situ monitoring of hot-spot defects in l-pbf: A new classification-based method for fast video-imaging data analysis,

    M. Bugatti and B. M. Colosimo, “Towards real-time in-situ monitoring of hot-spot defects in l-pbf: A new classification-based method for fast video-imaging data analysis,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 293–309, 2022

    2022

  90. [98]

    One class based feature learning approach for defect detection using deep autoencoders,

    A. Mujeeb, W. Dai, M. Erdt, and A. Sourin, “One class based feature learning approach for defect detection using deep autoencoders,” Advanced Engineering Informatics , vol. 42, p. 100933, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S1474034619301259

    2019

  91. [99]

    Vision based defects detection for keyhole tig welding using deep learning with visual explanation,

    C. Xia, Z. Pan, Z. Fei, S. Zhang, and H. Li, “Vision based defects detection for keyhole tig welding using deep learning with visual explanation,” Journal of Manufacturing Processes , vol. 56, pp. 845–855, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/artic...

    2020

  92. [100]

    Automated inspection in robotic additive manufacturing using deep learning for layer deformation detection,

    O. Davtalab, A. Kazemian, X. Yuan, and B. Khoshnevis, “Automated inspection in robotic additive manufacturing using deep learning for layer deformation detection,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing , vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 771–784, 2022

    2022

  93. [101]

    Vision-based defects detection for bridges using transfer learning and convolutional neural networks,

    J. Zhu, C. Zhang, H. Qi, and Z. Lu, “Vision-based defects detection for bridges using transfer learning and convolutional neural networks,” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering , vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 1037– 1049, 2020

    2020

  94. [102]

    A convolutional neural network approach for image-based anomaly detection in smart agriculture,

    J. Mendoza-Bernal, A. Gonz ´alez-Vidal, and A. F. Skarmeta, “A convolutional neural network approach for image-based anomaly detection in smart agriculture,” Expert Systems with Applications , vol. 247, p. 123210, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect. com/scien...

    2024

  95. [103]

    Deep convolutional neural network ensemble for pavement crack detection using high elevation uav images,

    G. E. Amieghemen and M. M. Sherif, “Deep convolutional neural network ensemble for pavement crack detection using high elevation uav images,” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, pp. 1–16, 2023

    2023

  96. [104]

    Deep learning-based instance segmentation of cracks from shield tunnel lining images,

    H. Huang, S. Zhao, D. Zhang, and J. Chen, “Deep learning-based instance segmentation of cracks from shield tunnel lining images,” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering , vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 183–196, 2022

    2022

  97. [105]

    Printed circuit board defect detection using deep learning via a skip-connected convolutional autoencoder,

    J. Kim, J. Ko, H. Choi, and H. Kim, “Printed circuit board defect detection using deep learning via a skip-connected convolutional autoencoder,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 15, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/15/4968

    2021

  98. [106]

    A robust weakly supervised learning of deep conv-nets for surface defect inspection,

    H. Chen, Q. Hu, B. Zhai, H. Chen, and K. Liu, “A robust weakly supervised learning of deep conv-nets for surface defect inspection,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 32, pp. 11 229–11 244, 2020

    2020

  99. [107]

    Multi-scale feature reconstruction network for industrial anomaly detection,

    E. Iqbal, S. U. Khan, S. Javed, B. Moyo, Y . Zweiri, and Y . Ab- dulrahman, “Multi-scale feature reconstruction network for industrial anomaly detection,” Knowledge-Based Systems , vol. 305, p. 112650, 2024

    2024

  100. [108]

    Rolling surface defect inspection for drum-shaped rollers based on deep learning,

    J. Tao, Y . Zhu, F. Jiang, H. Liu, and H. Liu, “Rolling surface defect inspection for drum-shaped rollers based on deep learning,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 8693–8700, 2022

    2022

  101. [109]

    Automated bridge crack detection method based on lightweight vision models,

    J. Zhang, S. Qian, and C. Tan, “Automated bridge crack detection method based on lightweight vision models,” Complex & Intelligent Systems, vol. 9, pp. 1–14, 09 2022

    2022

  102. [110]

    A novel hybrid yolo approach for precise paper defect detection with a dual-layer template and an attention mechanism,

    X. Li, H. Yan, K. Cui, Z. Li, R. Liu, G. Lu, K. C. Hsieh, X. Liu, and C. Hon, “A novel hybrid yolo approach for precise paper defect detection with a dual-layer template and an attention mechanism,”IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 11 651–11 669, 2024

    2024

  103. [111]

    Leather defect classification and segmentation using deep learning architecture,

    S.-T. Liong, D. Zheng, Y .-C. Huang, and Y . S. Gan, “Leather defect classification and segmentation using deep learning architecture,” Inter- national Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing , vol. 33, no. 10-11, pp. 1105–1117, 2020

    2020

  104. [112]

    Efficient online surface defect detection using multiple instance learning,

    G. Xu, M. Ren, and G. Li, “Efficient online surface defect detection using multiple instance learning,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 252, p. 124244, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417424011102

    2024

  105. [113]

    Mvtec ad — a comprehensive real-world dataset for unsupervised anomaly detection,

    P. Bergmann, M. Fauser, D. Sattlegger, and C. Steger, “Mvtec ad — a comprehensive real-world dataset for unsupervised anomaly detection,” in 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2019, pp. 9584–9592

    2019

  106. [114]

    Efficientad: Accurate visual anomaly detection at millisecond-level latencies,

    K. Batzner, L. Heckler, and R. K ¨onig, “Efficientad: Accurate visual anomaly detection at millisecond-level latencies,” in 2024 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2024, pp. 127–137

    2024

  107. [115]

    End-to-end training of a two- stage neural network for defect detection,

    J. Bo ˇziˇc, D. Tabernik, and D. Sko ˇcaj, “End-to-end training of a two- stage neural network for defect detection,” in 2020 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR) , 2021, pp. 5619–5626

    2020

  108. [116]

    Mixed supervision for surface- defect detection: from weakly to fully supervised learning,

    J. Bo ˇziˇc, D. Tabernik, and D. Sko ˇcaj, “Mixed supervision for surface- defect detection: from weakly to fully supervised learning,” Computers in Industry, 2021

    2021

  109. [117]

    Efficient anomaly detection with budget annotation using semi-supervised residual transformer,

    H. Li, J. Wu, H. Chen, M. Wang, and C. Shen, “Efficient anomaly detection with budget annotation using semi-supervised residual transformer,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306. 03492

    2024

  110. [118]

    Beyond dents and scratches: Logical constraints in unsupervised anomaly detection and localization,

    P. Bergmann, K. Batzner, M. Fauser, D. Sattlegger, and C. Steger, “Beyond dents and scratches: Logical constraints in unsupervised anomaly detection and localization,” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 130, 04 2022

    2022

  111. [119]

    Few shot part segmentation reveals compositional logic for industrial anomaly detection,

    S. Kim, S. An, P. Chikontwe, M. Kang, E. Adeli, K. M. Pohl, and S. H. Park, “Few shot part segmentation reveals compositional logic for industrial anomaly detection,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.13783

    2024 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Spot-the- difference self-supervised pre-training for anomaly detection and seg- mentation,

    Y . Zou, J. Jeong, L. Pemula, D. Zhang, and O. Dabeer, “Spot-the- difference self-supervised pre-training for anomaly detection and seg- mentation,” in Computer Vision – ECCV 2022 , S. Avidan, G. Brostow, M. Ciss ´e, G. M. Farinella, and T. Hassner, Eds. Cham: Springer Nature ...

    2022

  113. [121]

    Diffusionad: Norm- guided one-step denoising diffusion for anomaly detection,

    H. Zhang, Z. Wang, Z. Wu, and Y .-G. Jiang, “Diffusionad: Norm- guided one-step denoising diffusion for anomaly detection,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08730

    2023 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Industrial anomaly detection with domain shift: A real-world dataset and masked multi-scale reconstruction,

    Z. Zhang, Z. Zhao, X. Zhang, C. Sun, and X. Chen, “Industrial anomaly detection with domain shift: A real-world dataset and masked multi-scale reconstruction,” Computers in Industry , vol. 151, p. 103990, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/articl...

    2023

  115. [123]

    Real-iad: A real-world multi-view dataset for benchmarking versatile industrial anomaly detection,

    C. Wang, W. Zhu, B.-B. Gao, Z. Gan, J. Zhang, Z. Gu, S. Qian, M. Chen, and L. Ma, “Real-iad: A real-world multi-view dataset for benchmarking versatile industrial anomaly detection,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.12580

    2024 arXiv

  116. [124]

    Supervised anomaly detection for complex industrial images,

    A. Baitieva, D. Hurych, V . Besnier, and O. Bernard, “Supervised anomaly detection for complex industrial images,” 2024

    2024

  117. [125]

    Explainable machine learning models for defects detection in industrial processes,

    R. M. A. Oliveira, ˆAngelo M ´arcio Oliveira Sant’Anna, and P. H. F. da Silva, “Explainable machine learning models for defects detection in industrial processes,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 192, p. 110214, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.c...

    2024

  118. [126]

    Vision-language models for vision tasks: A survey,

    J. Zhang, J. Huang, S. Jin, and S. Lu, “Vision-language models for vision tasks: A survey,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 5625–5644, 2024

    2024

  119. [127]

    Anomalygpt: Detecting industrial anomalies using large vision-language models,

    Z. Gu, B. Zhu, G. Zhu, Y . Chen, M. Tang, and J. Wang, “Anomalygpt: Detecting industrial anomalies using large vision-language models,”

  120. [128]

    Video anomaly detection in 10 years: A survey and outlook,

    M. Abdalla, S. Javed, M. A. Radi, A. Ulhaq, and N. Werghi, “Video anomaly detection in 10 years: A survey and outlook,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.19387 Abdelrahman Alzarooni received the B.S. de- gree in aerospace engineering from the Pennsyl- vania...

    2024 arXiv

  121. [131]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.15366

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.15366

    arXiv

  122. [2022]

    Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID: 247318847

    [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID: 247318847

  123. [2023]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.04268

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.04268

    arXiv

  124. [2024]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.07880

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.07880

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.