Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 85 references

Large Amplitude Oscillatory Extension (LAOE) of dilute polymer solutions

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Dilute polymer solutions under oscillatory stretching show a sharp transition to nonlinearity, and this paper reports the first experimental stress measurements of that transition.

desk verdict A genuinely useful new experimental platform for LAOE of dilute polymer solutions, with a solid qualitative core but a quantitative onset law that is fit, not prediction, and an excess-pressure interpretation that outruns the homogeneity evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.11950 v1 pith:DMTAVEF3 submitted 2025-01-21 physics.flu-dyn cond-mat.soft

Steffen M. Recktenwald , Thomas P. John , Amy Q. Shen , Robert J. Poole , Cláudio P. Fonte , Simon J. Haward This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dyncond-mat.soft
keywords largeamplitudeoscillatoryextensionextensionalrheologydilutepolymersolutionmicrofluidicscross-slotrheometerWeissenbergnumberDeborahLissajouscurves
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces a way to measure how dilute polymer solutions respond when repeatedly stretched and compressed in an oscillatory extensional flow. Using a microfluidic cross-slot device, the authors track the flow field and pressure drop in real time. For Newtonian fluids the response is linear, but polymer solutions show a sharp onset of nonlinearity: above a critical flow strength the strain rate along the extension axis drops below that along the compression axis, and an excess pressure drop appears. The onset is captured by a single formula relating the Weissenberg and Deborah numbers, and the measured Lissajous curves match predictions of standard viscoelastic models. This is claimed to be the first experimental measurement of the bulk stress response of dilute polymer solutions under large amplitude oscillatory extension.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing element is the optimized shape cross-slot extensional rheometer (OSCER), a microfluidic device producing a nearly homogeneous planar extensional flow at a stagnation point. The measured total and shear pressure drops are combined into an excess pressure drop $\Delta P_{\rm ex} = \Delta P_{\rm tot} - \Delta P_{\rm sh}$, which is treated as a proxy for the first normal stress difference $N_1$ of the homogeneous extensional flow. The onset of nonlinearity is organized by the effective Weissenberg number $Wi_{\rm eff} = Wi_{\max}/(k\,De+1)$ with $k=3$, and by the strain-hardening index $I = 1 - \dot{\varepsilon}'_{\rm out}/\dot{\varepsilon}'_{\rm in}$, which is zero for a Newtonian fluid and positive when the extension axis strain rate lags the compression axis. These quantities are compared against FENE-P and Giesekus constitutive models.

What would settle it

A spatial simulation of the real device geometry that fails to reproduce the measured pressure drop, or a local stress measurement showing the velocity distortion changes the excess pressure by more than the noise, would falsify the homogeneous-flow interpretation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that dilute polymer solutions under large amplitude oscillatory extension show a well-defined transition from linear to nonlinear response, and the paper provides the first experimental measurement of the associated stress response. Above a critical Weissenberg number $Wi_c \approx 1$, the average strain rate along the stretching axis falls below that along the compression axis, an effect quantified by a strain-hardening index, and the excess pressure drop develops characteristic Lissajous curves. The critical onset across frequencies obeys $Wi_c^{\rm LAOE} = Wi_c(k\,De+1)$ with $k = 3$, showing that more rapid oscillation delays the onset to higher flow strengths. Numerical solutions of the FENE-P and Giesekus models under a homogeneous planar extensional flow reproduce the qualitative shape and cycle-dependence of the measured stress response, with the Giesekus model capturing the full concave-to-linear-to-convex transition in the Lissajous curves.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the measured excess pressure drop faithfully represents the elastic stress of a simple uniform stretching flow, even though the polymer's own stretching visibly distorts the flow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the excess pressure drop indeed tracks the first normal stress difference, LAOE in the OSCER gives a quantitative, time-resolved measure of extensional stress in dilute polymer solutions, a quantity previously accessible only under steady or uniaxial conditions.
  • The critical condition $Wi_c^{\rm LAOE} = Wi_c(k\,De+1)$ with $k=3$ provides a predictive rule for when a given polymer solution will show nonlinear extensional response at a given oscillation frequency.
  • Pulsatile and oscillatory driving produce equivalent Lissajous curves at matching $De$ and $Wi_{\max}$, so the experimentally simpler pulsatile mode can be used to study the nonlinear stress response.
  • The comparison of FENE-P and Giesekus shows the latter captures the full shape transition of the Lissajous curves, offering an experimental fingerprint for distinguishing constitutive models under oscillatory extension.
  • The method's demonstrated linearity for Newtonian fluids across amplitudes and frequencies validates the microfluidic platform as a controlled nonlinear rheometer for low-viscosity fluids.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the effective-Weissenberg collapse is universal rather than specific to this PAA system, the same $k \approx 3$ might appear for other dilute polymer solutions; a test across different molecular weights and concentrations would show whether $k$ depends on extensibility $L$.
  • The measured onset corresponds to accumulated strains of $\varepsilon_c \approx 2$-$6$, which brackets the coil-stretch transition of long chains; combining LAOE with single-molecule DNA imaging in the same geometry could directly connect the bulk stress proxy to molecular extension.
  • The homogeneous-flow assumption in the simulations is put in question by the visible modification of the outlet velocity profile; a fully spatial CFD simulation of the same OSCER geometry could determine whether the quantitative agreement in Sec. III F is fortuitous.
  • Because the excess pressure drop is a proxy for $N_1$, converting it to a stress-versus-strain curve (rather than stress-versus-strain-rate) and integrating over a cycle would yield a measure of dissipated energy in oscillatory extension, analogous to LAOS.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports an experimental protocol for large-amplitude oscillatory extension (LAOE) of dilute polyacrylamide solutions in an optimized cross-slot microfluidic rheometer (OSCER). The authors impose pulsatile and oscillatory sinusoidal flow with programmable syringe pumps, measure the velocity field by micro-PIV and simultaneous pressure drops, and analyze normalized Lissajous curves of inlet/outlet strain rates and excess pressure drop. Newtonian controls remain linear, whereas the polymer solutions show the outlet strain rate falling below the inlet strain rate and an excess pressure drop arising once the temporal Weissenberg number exceeds about unity; an empirical onset criterion WicLAOE = Wic(k De + 1) with k = 3 is proposed. Homogeneous-flow FENE-P and Giesekus simulations are compared with the normalized excess pressure data.

Significance. The experimental core—Newtonian linearity, concentration-dependent deviation of the outlet strain rate, emergence of excess pressure near Wi approximately 1, and systematic dependence on De and Wimax—is well documented and constitutes a useful advance for probing extensional rheology under transient flow. Strengths include the use of PIV-measured rather than set strain rates, the broad parameter sweep, the comparison of pulsatile and oscillatory modes, the explicit frequency-response characterization of the pumping system, and the inclusion of the full ODE system in Appendix A. However, the manuscript's headline claim of a first quantitative measurement of the stress response under LAOE is not secured: the excess pressure is not demonstrated to equal the first normal stress difference of a homogeneous flow, and the central onset law contains a fitted constant. With re-scoping and additional validation, the approach could become a valuable tool for the community.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. II E and Sec. III F] The identification of the excess pressure drop ΔPex = ΔPtot − ΔPsh with the first normal stress difference N1 of a homogeneous planar extensional flow is load-bearing and is not supported by the data. In the very regime where ΔPex is significant, the PIV measurements show a flattening and eventually a local minimum of the outlet velocity profile (Figs. 4d, 6b, 10b), so the flow is not the homogeneous planar extension of Eq. (4). The comparison in Fig. 15 is made with normalized N1 and normalized ΔPex, so only the shape and phase of the signals are compared; no absolute stress values or extensional viscosities are reported. The authors should either provide absolute excess pressure data converted to stress through a validated relation, perform full CFD simulations that include the flow modification, or re-scope the claims to 'excess pressure drop' rather than 'stress response'.
  2. [Sec. III E, Eq. (5) and Fig. 14] The criterion WicLAOE = Wic(k De + 1) with k = 3 is not a prediction but a fit: the same onset data used to draw the red line in Fig. 14 are used to determine k, and the shaded region 1 ≤ k ≤ 5 shows a large uncertainty at larger De. The manuscript should state explicitly that this is an empirical fit, give the uncertainty in k, and ideally validate the scaling on an independent data subset or against a constitutive model before presenting it as a critical condition.
  3. [Sec. II E] The subtraction procedure assumes that the shear-dominated pressure drop ΔPsh measured with flow in only two channels (around a corner) equals the shear and entrance contribution in the four-channel flow used for ΔPtot. This equality is plausible for Newtonian fluids but not guaranteed for viscoelastic solutions, because polymer stretch history and stress distribution differ between the two configurations. The authors should justify this assumption, for example by testing whether ΔPex is zero at Wi < 1 in the polymer solutions or by estimating the magnitude of the configuration-dependent error.
  4. [Sec. II H and Sec. III F] The comparison with FENE-P and Giesekus models is under-constrained. The manuscript does not report the solvent viscosity ratio β used in Eq. (3), nor does it report absolute model predictions; the normalization Δσ′ = N1/N1,max removes any magnitude information. Consequently the agreement in Fig. 15 does not validate the microfluidic measurement quantitatively. Please report the model parameters and the absolute predicted and measured pressure or stress levels, or soften the conclusion that the simulations validate the experimental approach.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 2(b) caption] The phrase 'Qf lowflow' appears to be a typo for 'Qflow' or 'Qflow directions'.
  2. [References] References [23] and [25] are duplicates of the same paper by Rogers (2012); one of them should be removed.
  3. [Sec. III C 1] The text contains 'oscillatory LOAE', which should read 'LAOE'.
  4. [Sec. II G] The normalization of pressure by its maximum value is not meaningful when the signal crosses zero, as ΔPex does in Figs. 8(a) and 12(a); the definition of ΔPex,max and the noise floor threshold should be stated explicitly.
  5. [Eq. (5) and surrounding text] There are spacing artifacts such as 'Wief f' and 'Wi LAOE c'; please fix the formatting throughout.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the effective-Weissenberg critical line is an explicitly labeled one-parameter fit, and the central stress comparisons use independent rheological inputs.

full rationale

The manuscript's claimed derivation chain is: (i) PIV measures inlet and outlet strain rates; (ii) excess pressure drop is defined as ΔPex = ΔPtot − ΔPsh from two pressure configurations; (iii) FENE-P and Giesekus ODEs (Eqs. 2–4 and Appendix A) are solved using λ from CaBER measurements and L=143 from prior work; (iv) the onset of nonlinearity is characterized by an effective Weissenberg number (Eq. 5). The only apparent fit-to-data issue is the constant k=3 in Wi_LAOE_c = Wic(k De + 1). The paper explicitly states 'The red line in Fig. 14 represents this relation, using a prefactor of k = 3, which provides a reasonable fit to the experimental data' and describes k as 'a prefactor, previously used to align data from Hookean dumbbell models and numerical simulations.' Thus the critical line is presented as an empirical fit, not as a first-principles prediction or as a test of an independently derived constant. The steady anchor Wic ≈ 1 (Fig. 4g) and the LAOE onset classifications (Figs. 6d, 10c, 14) are independent PIV measurements, so the scaling is a transparent collapse rather than a hidden reuse of the target data. The FENE-P/Giesekus comparison uses relaxation times measured by CaBER and extensibility from prior experimental characterizations (Refs. 48 and 49), which are external to the present fitted values; the authors also acknowledge that the model assumes homogeneous flow and does not capture the observed flow modification, which is a validity limitation rather than a circularity. Self-citations to the OSCER geometry and prior extensional rheometry are background methodology, not a load-bearing uniqueness argument. No step reduces by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper contributes an experimental framework and data; its main free parameters are the relaxation time from CaBER (independently measured) and the onset-law prefactor k, which is fitted. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • k = 3
    Prefactor in Wieff = Wimax/(k De + 1); fitted to the onset data shown in Fig. 14.
  • lambda_CaBER = 0.25, 0.34, 0.58 s (200, 400, 800 ppm PAA)
    Relaxation time extracted from exponential filament decay in CaBER; used to define Wi and De, so the onset criterion depends on it.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption OSCER central region approximates homogeneous planar extensional flow
    Used to interpret measured strain rates and pressure drop as representative of planar extension; enters in Sec II B.
  • domain assumption dPex = dPtot - dPsh isolates elongational stress
    Established method from prior cross-slot rheometry; enters Sec II E.
  • domain assumption CaBER lambda is the single-mode relaxation time relevant for Wi and De
    Used in Sec II G for dimensionless groups; uncertainty not propagated.
  • domain assumption FENE-P and Giesekus describe the dilute PAA solutions
    Used in Sec II H for comparison.
  • standard math Incompressibility gives du/dx + dv/dy = 0
    Used to relate inlet and outlet strain rates at stagnation point in Sec III A 1.
  • ad hoc to paper Effective Weissenberg number form Wieff = Wimax/(k De + 1)
    Adapted from Zhou and Schroeder; k fitted here, so the functional form and constant are post hoc.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Large Amplitude Oscillatory Extension (LAOE) of dilute polymer solutions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DMTAVEF3

@misc{pith2026250111950,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Large Amplitude Oscillatory Extension (LAOE) of dilute polymer solutions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DMTAVEF3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.11950}
}
read the original abstract

This study presents an experimental framework for large amplitude oscillatory extension (LAOE) to investigate nonlinear material properties of complex fluids. Using a microfluidic optimized shape cross-slot extensional rheometer, we generate approximately homogeneous planar extensional flows driven by programmable syringe pumps operating in oscillatory or pulsatile sinusoidal modes. Micro-particle image velocimetry and simultaneous pressure drop measurements are employed to analyze the time-dependent flow field and elastic stress response. For Newtonian fluids, a linear relationship between the applied strain rate and pressure drop is observed across a wide range of oscillation amplitudes and frequencies. In contrast, dilute polymer solutions exhibit significant deviations, with excess pressure drops and divergence between average strain rates along extension and compression axes during the LAOE cycle. By spanning a broad range of Weissenberg and Deborah numbers, we identify unique Lissajous curves and critical conditions for the onset of nonlinearities under oscillatory extension. Numerical simulations, assuming homogeneous flow, underpin the experimental findings, validating the robustness of our microfluidic approach. This study demonstrates the utility of oscillatory extensional flows for probing the nonlinear rheological behavior of soft materials, offering quantitative insights into their extensional properties under nonlinear flow conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.11950 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Rheological responses of the test fluids in shear and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Overview of the experimental setup and operating procedure. (a) Schematic illustration of the optimized shape cross [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. System response under pulsatile LAOE. (a) Ratio of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Planar Newtonian and non-Newtonian flow under steady flow conditions. (a) Normalized velocity field with superim [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Newtonian flow under pulsatile LAOE. (a) Repre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Non-Newtonian flow under pulsatile LAOE. (a) Representative raw measurements of the absolute values of the inlet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Flow field characterization of a non-Newtonian fluid under pulsatile LAOE. Data is representatively shown for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Excess pressure during pulsatile LAOE. (a) Representative measurement for the 800 ppm PAA sample showing the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Newtonian flow under oscillatory LAOE. (a) Representative raw measurements of the absolute values of the inlet ˙ε [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Non-Newtonian flow under oscillatory LAOE. (a) Representative raw measurements of the absolute values of the inlet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Flow field characterization of a non-Newtonian fluid under oscillatory LAOE. Data are representatively shown for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Excess pressure during oscillatory LAOE. (a) Representative measurement for the 800 ppm PAA sample showing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Comparison of pulsatile and oscillatory LAOE. (a) Lissajous curves of the normalized strain rate in the outlet direction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Critical conditions for the onset of non-linearities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Comparison of simulation and experiment for pulsatile LAOE. (a) Temporal evolution of the normalized stress ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_15.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Newtonian fluid Figure 9 summarizes the flow behavior of the New- tonian reference fluid under oscillatory LAOE. Similar to pulsatile LAOE, we observe ˙ εout(t) = − ˙εin(t) for the Newtonian fluid, with both strain rates and the pres- sure signal following the magnitude of the imposed si- nusoidal signal, as shown in Fig. 9(a). Throughout the cycle, the v...

  2. [2]

    Flow field characterization We proceed to exam- ine the flow field of the viscoelastic PAA solutions under pulsatile LAOE

    Polymer solution a. Flow field characterization We proceed to exam- ine the flow field of the viscoelastic PAA solutions under pulsatile LAOE. Figure 6(a) shows a representative mea- surement of the modulus of the average extension rates ˙εin and ˙εout, as well as the total pressure drop ∆ Ptot for the 800 ppm PAA sample at ˙ ε0,set = 5 s−1 and T = 10 s (...

  3. [3]

    Polymer solution a. Flow field characterization Figure 10(a) presents a representative measurement of the average extension rates ˙εin and ˙εout along with the total pressure drop ∆Ptot for the 800 ppm PAA sample at ˙ ε0,set = 5 s−1 and T = 10 s over two oscillation cycles. Similar to the Newtonian case, we observe that both the inlet strain rate and the ...

  4. [4]

    J. D. Ferry, W. M. Sawyer, J. N. Ashworth, Behavior of concentrated polymer solutions under periodic stresses, Journal of Polymer Science 2 (6) (1947) 593–611. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1947.120020604. URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10. 1002/pol.1947.120020604

    work page arXiv 1947

  5. [5]

    J. D. Ferry, Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers, Vol. 264, Wiley, 1980

    1980

  6. [6]

    R. B. Bird, R. C. Armstrong, O. Hassager, Dynamics of polymeric liquids. Vol. 1, 2nd Ed. : Fluid mechanics, Vol. 1, Wiley, 1987

    1987

  7. [7]

    N. W. Tschoegl, The Phenomenological The- ory of Linear Viscoelastic Behavior, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1989. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-73602-5 . URL http://link.springer.com/10.1007/ 978-3-642-73602-5

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-73602-5 1989

  8. [8]

    W. P. Fletcher, A. N. Gent, Nonlinearity in the dy- namic properties of vulcanized rubber compounds, Rub- ber Chemistry and Technology 27 (1) (1954) 209–222. doi:10.5254/1.3543472. URL https://doi.org/10.5254/1.3543472

    work page doi:10.5254/1.3543472 1954

Show all 85 references
  1. [9]

    K. Hyun, S. H. Kim, K. H. Ahn, S. J. Lee, Large amplitude oscillatory shear as a way to classify the complex fluids, J. Nonnewton. Fluid Mech. 107 (1-3) (2002) 51–65. doi:10.1016/S0377-0257(02)00141-6 . URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/ pii/S0377025702001416

    2002 doi

  2. [10]

    Wilhelm, Fourier-Transform Rheology, Macro- mol

    M. Wilhelm, Fourier-Transform Rheology, Macro- mol. Mater. Eng. 287 (2) (2002) 83–105. doi:10.1002/1439-2054(20020201)287:2<83:: AID-MAME83>3.0.CO;2-B . URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ 10.1002/1439-2054(20020201)287:2{%}3C83:: AID-MAME83{%}3E3.0.CO;2-B

    2002 doi

  3. [11]

    K. Hyun, M. Wilhelm, C. O. Klein, K. S. Cho, J. G. Nam, K. H. Ahn, S. J. Lee, R. H. Ewoldt, G. H. McKinley, A review of nonlinear oscillatory shear tests: Analysis and application of large amplitude oscillatory shear (LAOS), Prog. Polym. Sci. 36 (12) (2011) 1697–

    2011

  4. [12]

    Jones, S

    S. Jones, S. VandenHeuvel, A. Luengo Martinez, R. Birur, E. Burgeson, I. Gilbert, A. Baker, M. Wolf, S. A. Raghavan, S. Rogers, E. Cosgriff-Hernandez, Suspension electrospinning of decellularized extra- cellular matrix: A new method to preserve bioac- tivity, Bioact. Mater. 41...

    2024 doi

  5. [13]

    Giacomin, R

    A. Giacomin, R. Bird, L. Johnson, A. Mix, Large- amplitude oscillatory shear flow from the corotational Maxwell model, J. Nonnewton. Fluid Mech. 166 (19-20) (2011) 1081–1099. doi:10.1016/j.jnnfm.2011.04.002. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnnfm.2011.04. 002

    2011 doi

  6. [14]

    Kamkar, R

    M. Kamkar, R. Salehiyan, T. B. Goudoulas, M. Abbasi, C. Saengow, E. Erfanian, S. Sadeghi, G. Natale, S. A. Rogers, A. J. Giacomin, U. Sundararaj, Large amplitude oscillatory shear flow: Microstructural assessment of polymeric systems, Prog. Polym. Sci. 132 (2022) 101580. doi:1...

    2022

  7. [15]

    Y. Wang, C. Selomulya, Food rheology applications of large amplitude oscillation shear (LAOS), Trends Food Sci. Technol. 127 (May) (2022) 221–244. doi:10.1016/ j.tifs.2022.05.018. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2022.05.018 25

    2022 doi

  8. [16]

    Wilhelm, D

    M. Wilhelm, D. Maring, H.-W. Spiess, Fourier- transform rheology, Rheol. Acta 37 (4) (1998) 399–405. doi:10.1007/s003970050126. URL http://link.springer.com/10.1007/ s003970050126

    1998 doi

  9. [17]

    Armstrong, A

    M. Armstrong, A. Pincot, S. Rogers, T. Knight, D. Bailey, Recent Advances in Biofluid Mechanics and Bio- and Hemorheology Collating Recent Advances in Predicting Complex Behavior of Human Blood With Thixo-Elasto-Visco-Plastic Models and Sequence of Physical Process, Front. Phy...

    2022

  10. [18]

    Philippoff, Vibrational Measurements with Large Amplitudes, Trans

    W. Philippoff, Vibrational Measurements with Large Amplitudes, Trans. Soc. Rheol. 10 (1) (1966) 317–334. doi:10.1122/1.549049. URL https://pubs.aip.org/ jor/article/10/1/317/417208/ Vibrational-Measurements-with-Large-Amplitudes

    1966 doi

  11. [19]

    Harris, K

    J. Harris, K. Bogie, The experimental analysis of non- linear waves in mechanical systems, Rheol. Acta 6 (1) (1967) 3–5. doi:10.1007/BF01968375. URL http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF01968375

    1967 doi

  12. [20]

    Klein, P

    C. Klein, P. Venema, L. Sagis, E. van der Linden, Rheological discrimination and characterization of carrageenans and starches by Fourier transform- rheology in the non-linear viscous regime, J. Non- newton. Fluid Mech. 151 (1-3) (2008) 145–150. doi:10.1016/j.jnnfm.2008.01.001...

    2008 doi

  13. [21]

    Wilhelm, P

    M. Wilhelm, P. Reinheimer, M. Ortseifer, High sensi- tivity Fourier-transform rheology, Rheol. Acta 38 (4) (1999) 349–356. doi:10.1007/s003970050185. URL http://link.springer.com/10.1007/ s003970050185

    1999 doi

  14. [22]

    K. S. Cho, K. Hyun, K. H. Ahn, S. J. Lee, A geomet- rical interpretation of large amplitude oscillatory shear response, J. Rheol. (N. Y. N. Y). 49 (3) (2005) 747–758. doi:10.1122/1.1895801. URL https://pubs.aip.org/sor/jor/article/49/3/ 747-758/239982

    2005 doi

  15. [23]

    C. O. Klein, H. W. Spiess, A. Calin, C. Balan, M. Wil- helm, Separation of the Nonlinear Oscillatory Response into a Superposition of Linear, Strain Hardening, Strain Softening, and Wall Slip Response, Macromolecules 40 (12) (2007) 4250–4259. doi:10.1021/ma062441u. URL https:/...

    2007 doi

  16. [24]

    S. A. Rogers, In search of physical meaning: defining transient parameters for nonlinear vis- coelasticity, Rheol. Acta 56 (5) (2017) 501–525. doi:10.1007/s00397-017-1008-1 . URL http://link.springer.com/10.1007/ s00397-017-1008-1

    2017 doi

  17. [25]

    R. H. Ewoldt, A. E. Hosoi, G. H. McKinley, New mea- sures for characterizing nonlinear viscoelasticity in large amplitude oscillatory shear, J. Rheol. (N. Y. N. Y). 52 (6) (2008) 1427–1458. doi:10.1122/1.2970095. URL https://pubs.aip.org/sor/jor/article/52/6/ 1427-1458/240149

    2008 doi

  18. [26]

    R. H. Ewoldt, Defining nonlinear rheological material functions for oscillatory shear, J. Rheol. (N. Y. N. Y). 57 (1) (2013) 177–195. doi:10.1122/1.4764498. URL https://pubs.aip.org/sor/jor/article/57/1/ 177-195/240953

    2013 doi

  19. [28]

    Oswald, N

    W. Oswald, N. Willenbacher, Controlling the elonga- tional flow behavior of complex shear-thinning fluids without affecting shear viscosity, Rheol. Acta 58 (10) (2019) 687–698. doi:10.1007/s00397-019-01170-y . URL http://link.springer.com/10.1007/ s00397-019-01170-y

    2019 doi

  20. [29]

    S. A. Rogers, A sequence of physical processes deter- mined and quantified in LAOS: An instantaneous local 2D/3D approach, J. Rheol. (N. Y. N. Y). 56 (5) (2012) 1129–1151. doi:10.1122/1.4726083. URL https://pubs.aip.org/sor/jor/article/56/5/ 1129-1151/240871

    2012 doi

  21. [30]

    J. Choi, F. Nettesheim, S. A. Rogers, The unification of disparate rheological measures in oscillatory shearing, Phys. Fluids 31 (7) (jul 2019). doi:10.1063/1.5106378. URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5106378

    2019 doi

  22. [31]

    J. C.-W. Lee, K. M. Weigandt, E. G. Kelley, S. A. Rogers, Structure-Property Relationships via Recov- ery Rheology in Viscoelastic Materials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (24) (2019) 248003. arXiv:1905.07849, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.248003. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ Ph...

    2019 arXiv

  23. [32]

    Jiang, Modeling nonlinear viscoelastic behavior under large deformations, Rubber Chemistry and Technology 88 (1) (2015) 28–39

    B. Jiang, Modeling nonlinear viscoelastic behavior under large deformations, Rubber Chemistry and Technology 88 (1) (2015) 28–39. doi:10.5254/rct.14.86927. URL https://doi.org/10.5254/rct.14.86927

    2015 doi

  24. [33]

    M. S. Abdelgawad, S. J. Haward, A. Q. Shen, M. E. Rosti, From yield stress to elastic in- stabilities: tuning the extensional behavior of elastoviscoplastic fluids, PNAS Nexus (2024) 1– 10doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae227/7688418. URL https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/ advance-ar...

    2024 doi

  25. [34]

    H. K. Rasmussen, P. Laill´ e, K. Yu, Large amplitude oscillatory elongation flow, Rheol. Acta 47 (1) (2008) 97–103. doi:10.1007/s00397-007-0216-5 . URL http://link.springer.com/10.1007/ s00397-007-0216-5

    2008 doi

  26. [35]

    A. G. Bejenariu, H. K. Rasmussen, A. L. Skov, O. Has- sager, S. M. Frankaer, Large amplitude oscillatory extension of soft polymeric networks, Rheol. Acta 49 (8) (2010) 807–814. doi:10.1007/s00397-010-0464-7 . URL http://link.springer.com/10.1007/ s00397-010-0464-7

    2010 doi

  27. [36]

    S. L. Anna, G. H. McKinley, D. a. Nguyen, T. Sridhar, S. J. Muller, J. Huang, D. F. James, An interlaboratory comparison of measurements from filament-stretching rheometers using common test fluids, J. Rheol. (N. Y. N. Y). 45 (1) (2001) 83–114. doi:10.1122/1.1332388. URL http:...

    2001 doi

  28. [37]

    Dessi, D

    C. Dessi, D. Vlassopoulos, A. J. Giacomin, C. Saengow, 26 Elastomers in large-amplitude oscillatory uniax- ial extension, Rheol. Acta 56 (12) (2017) 955–970. doi:10.1007/s00397-017-1046-8 . URL http://link.springer.com/10.1007/ s00397-017-1046-8

    2017 doi

  29. [38]

    Staropoli, D

    M. Staropoli, D. Gerstner, B. Duez, M. Sztucki, G. Vehres, A. Radulescu, J.-S. Thomann, S. West- ermann, W. Pyckhout-Hintzen, A spatio-temporal in-situ investigation of the Payne effect in silica- filled rubbers in Large Amplitude Oscillatory Exten- sion, Polymer (Guildf). 251...

    2022

  30. [39]

    S. Liu, Y. Jiang, B. Xu, S. Jiang, Insight of the non-linear viscoelasticity of noodle dough using large amplitude oscillatory extension tests and the correlation with noodle quality, J. Food Eng. 341 (October 2022) (2023) 111320. doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2022.111320. URL https:...

    2023

  31. [40]

    S. J. Haward, V. Sharma, J. A. Odell, Extensional opto- rheometry with biofluids and ultra-dilute polymer solu- tions, Soft Matter 7 (21) (2011) 9908. doi:10.1039/ c1sm05493g. URL http://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=c1sm05493g

    2011

  32. [41]

    G. H. McKinley, T. Sridhar, Filament-stretching rheom- etry of complex fluid, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 34 (1) (2002) 375–415. doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.34. 083001.125207. URL http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/ annurev.fluid.34.083001.125207

    2002

  33. [42]

    Odell, S

    J. Odell, S. Carrington, Extensional flow oscillatory rheometry, J. Nonnewton. Fluid Mech. 137 (1-3) (2006) 110–120. doi:10.1016/j.jnnfm.2006.03.010. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/ pii/S0377025706000760

    2006 doi

  34. [43]

    S. J. Haward, J. A. Odell, Z. Li, X.-F. Yuan, Extensional rheology of dilute polymer solutions in oscillatory cross-slot flow: the transient behaviour of birefrin- gent strands, Rheol. Acta 49 (6) (2010) 633–645. doi:10.1007/s00397-009-0420-6 . URL http://link.springer.com/10....

    2010 doi

  35. [44]

    Y. Zhou, C. M. Schroeder, Transient and Average Un- steady Dynamics of Single Polymers in Large-Amplitude Oscillatory Extension, Macromolecules 49 (20) (2016) 8018–8030. doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.6b01606. URL https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs. macromol.6b01606

    2016 doi

  36. [45]

    S. H. Bryngelson, J. B. Freund, Non-modal Floquet sta- bility of capsules in large-amplitude oscillatory exten- sional flow, Eur. J. Mech. - B/Fluids 77 (2019) 171–176. doi:10.1016/j.euromechflu.2019.04.012. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechflu.2019. 04.012

    2019 doi

  37. [46]

    C. Lin, D. Kumar, C. M. Richter, S. Wang, C. M. Schroeder, V. Narsimhan, Vesicle dynamics in large amplitude oscillatory extensional flow, J. Fluid Mech. 929 (2021) A43. arXiv:2102.09097, doi:10.1017/jfm.2021.885. URL https://www.cambridge.org/core/ product/identifier/S0022112...

    2021 arXiv

  38. [47]

    Y. Zhou, C. M. Schroeder, Single polymer dy- namics under large amplitude oscillatory exten- sion, Phys. Rev. Fluids 1 (5) (2016) 053301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevFluids.1.053301. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevFluids.1.053301

    2016 doi

  39. [48]

    S. J. Haward, S. Varchanis, G. H. McKinley, M. A. Alves, A. Q. Shen, Extensional rheometry of mobile fluids. Part II: Comparison between the uniaxial, planar, and biaxial extensional rheology of dilute polymer solutions using numerically optimized stagnation point microfluidic...

    2023 arXiv

  40. [49]

    M. A. Alves, A. Co, G. L. Leal, R. H. Colby, A. J. Gia- comin, Design of a Cross-Slot Flow Channel for Exten- sional Viscosity Measurements, in: AIP Conf. Proc., Vol. 1027, AIP, 2008, pp. 240–242. doi:10.1063/1.2964648. URL https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article/1027/ 1/240-242/628891

    2008 doi

  41. [50]

    S. J. Haward, G. H. McKinley, A. Q. Shen, Elastic in- stabilities in planar elongational flow of monodisperse polymer solutions, Sci. Rep. 6 (1) (2016) 33029. doi: 10.1038/srep33029. URL https://www.nature.com/articles/srep33029

    2016 doi

  42. [51]

    S. M. Recktenwald, S. J. Haward, A. Q. Shen, N. Willenbacher, Heterogeneous flow inside threads of low viscosity fluids leads to anomalous long filament lifetimes, Sci. Rep. 9 (1) (2019) 7110. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-43590-z . URL http://www.nature.com/articles/ s41598-019-43590-z

    2019 doi

  43. [52]

    S. J. Haward, M. S. N. Oliveira, M. A. Alves, G. H. McKinley, Optimized Cross-Slot Flow Ge- ometry for Microfluidic Extensional Rheome- 27 try, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (12) (2012) 128301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.128301. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.109.128301

    2012 doi

  44. [53]

    D. W. Carlson, A. Q. Shen, S. J. Haward, Explor- ing multi-stability in three-dimensional viscoelastic flow around a free stagnation point, J. Nonnewton. Fluid Mech. 323 (December 2023) (2024) 105169. doi:10. 1016/j.jnnfm.2023.105169. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnnfm.2023.105169

    2024

  45. [54]

    S. L. Anna, G. H. McKinley, Elasto-capillary thinning and breakup of model elastic liquids, J. Rheol. (N. Y. N. Y). 45 (1) (2001) 115–138. doi:10.1122/1.1332389. URL https://pubs.aip.org/sor/jor/article/45/1/ 115-138/239558

    2001 doi

  46. [55]

    S. J. Haward, F. Pimenta, S. Varchanis, D. W. Carlson, K. Toda-Peters, M. A. Alves, A. Q. Shen, Extensional rheometry of mobile fluids. Part I: OUBER, an optimized uniaxial and biaxial extensional rheometer, J. Rheol. (N. Y. N. Y). 67 (5) (2023) 995–1009. arXiv:2302.10401, doi...

    2023 arXiv

  47. [56]

    Wereley, C

    S. Wereley, C. Meinhart, Micron-Resolution Particle Image Velocimetry, in: Microscale Diagnostic Tech., Springer-Verlag, 2019, pp. 51–112. doi:10.1007/ 3-540-26449-3_2 . URL https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26449-3_2

    2019 doi

  48. [57]

    F. J. Galindo-Rosales, M. S. N. Oliveira, M. A. Alves, Optimized cross-slot microdevices for homogeneous ex- tension, RSC Adv. 4 (15) (2014) 7799. doi:10.1039/ c3ra47230b. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C3RA47230B

    2014 doi

  49. [58]

    S. J. Haward, Microfluidic extensional rheometry using stagnation point flow, Biomicrofluidics 10 (4) (jul 2016). doi:10.1063/1.4945604. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4945604

    2016 doi

  50. [59]

    S. T. Wereley, C. D. Meinhart, Recent Advances in Micro-Particle Image Velocimetry, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42 (1) (2010) 557–576. doi:10.1146/ annurev-fluid-121108-145427 . URL https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/ annurev-fluid-121108-145427

    2010

  51. [60]

    Y.-J. Li, T. Cao, K.-R. Qin, Transmission of dynamic biochemical signals in the shallow microfluidic chan- nel: nonlinear modulation of the pulsatile flow, Mi- crofluid. Nanofluidics 22 (8) (2018) 81. doi:10.1007/ s10404-018-2097-6 . URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10404-018-2097-6

    2018 doi

  52. [61]

    C. D. Meinhart, S. T. Wereley, M. H. B. Gray, Vol- ume illumination for two-dimensional particle image velocimetry, Meas. Sci. Technol. 11 (6) (2000) 809–814. doi:10.1088/0957-0233/11/6/326. URL http://stacks.iop.org/ 0957-0233/11/i=6/a=326?key=crossref. 60effff1c17e24778a16ac...

    2000 doi

  53. [62]

    S. J. Haward, T. J. Ober, M. S. Oliveira, M. a. Alves, G. H. McKinley, Extensional rheology and elastic in- stabilities of a wormlike micellar solution in a microflu- idic cross-slot device, Soft Matter 8 (2) (2012) 536–555. doi:10.1039/C1SM06494K. URL http://xlink.rsc.org/?DO...

    2012 doi

  54. [63]

    R. C. van der Burgt, P. D. Anderson, J. M. den Toonder, F. N. van de Vosse, A microscale pulsatile flow device for dynamic cross-slot rheometry, Sensors Actuators A Phys. 220 (2014) 221–229. doi:10.1016/j.sna.2014.09.019. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2014.09.019

    2014 doi

  55. [64]

    Poole, On the use of the Astarita flow field for viscoelastic fluids to develop a generalised Newtonian fluid model incorporating flow type (GNFFTy), J

    R. Poole, On the use of the Astarita flow field for viscoelastic fluids to develop a generalised Newtonian fluid model incorporating flow type (GNFFTy), J. Fluid Mech. 987 (2024) A2. doi:10.1017/jfm.2024.344. URL https://www.cambridge.org/core/ product/identifier/S002211202400...

    2024 doi

  56. [65]

    S. M. Recktenwald, C. Wagner, T. John, Optimizing pressure-driven pulsatile flows in microfluidic devices, Lab Chip 21 (13) (2021) 2605–2613. doi:10.1039/ D0LC01297A. URL https://doi.org/10.1039/D0LC01297A

    2021 doi

  57. [66]

    Poole, The Deborah and Weissenberg numbers, Br

    R. Poole, The Deborah and Weissenberg numbers, Br. Soc. Rheol. Rheol. Bull. 53 (2) (2012) 32–39. URL http://www.smp.uq.edu.au/pitch

    2012

  58. [67]

    H. Giesekus, A simple constitutive equation for poly- mer fluids based on the concept of deformation- dependent tensorial mobility, Journal of Non- Newtonian Fluid Mechanics 11 (1-2) (1982) 69–109. doi:10.1016/0377-0257(82)85016-7 . URL https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0257(82) 85016-7

    1982 doi

  59. [68]

    Gardner, E

    K. Gardner, E. Pike, M. Miles, A. Keller, K. Tanaka, Photon-correlation velocimetry of polystyrene solutions in extensional flow fields, Polymer (Guildf). 23 (10) (1982) 1435–1442. doi:10.1016/0032-3861(82)90240-3 . URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/ pii/0032386182902403

    1982

  60. [69]

    P. E. Arratia, C. C. Thomas, J. Diorio, J. P. Gollub, Elastic Instabilities of Polymer Solutions in Cross- Channel Flow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (14) (2006) 144502. arXiv:0703262, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.144502. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.96.144502

    2006 doi

  61. [70]

    R. J. Poole, M. A. Alves, P. J. Oliveira, Purely Elastic Flow Asymmetries, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (16) (2007) 164503. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.164503. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.99.164503

    2007 doi

  62. [72]

    S. J. Haward, G. H. McKinley, Instabilities in stagna- tion point flows of polymer solutions, Phys. Fluids 25 (8) (2013). doi:10.1063/1.4818151

    2013 doi

  63. [73]

    Pakdel, G

    P. Pakdel, G. H. McKinley, Elastic Instability and Curved Streamlines, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (12) (1996) 2459–2462. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2459. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.77.2459

    1996 doi

  64. [74]

    G. N. Rocha, R. J. Poole, M. A. Alves, P. J. Oliveira, On extensibility effects in the cross-slot flow bifurcation, J. Nonnewton. Fluid Mech. 156 (1-2) (2009) 58–69. doi:10.1016/j.jnnfm.2008.06.008. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/ pii/S0377025708001286

    2009 doi

  65. [75]

    S. J. Haward, G. H. McKinley, Stagnation point flow of wormlike micellar solutions in a microfluidic cross-slot device: Effects of surfactant concentration and ionic en- vironment, Phys. Rev. E 85 (3) (2012) 031502. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.031502. URL https://link.aps.org/doi...

    2012 doi

  66. [76]

    S. J. Haward, J. A. Odell, Z. Li, X.-F. Yuan, The rheology of polymer solution elastic strands in ex- tensional flow, Rheol. Acta 49 (7) (2010) 781–788. doi:10.1007/s00397-010-0453-x . URL http://link.springer.com/10.1007/ s00397-010-0453-x

    2010 doi

  67. [77]

    Lyazid, O

    A. Lyazid, O. Scrivener, R. Teitgen, Velocity Field in an Elongational Polymer Solution Flow, in: Rhe- ology, Springer US, Boston, MA, 1980, pp. 141–148. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-3743-0_29 . URL http://link.springer.com/10.1007/ 978-1-4684-3743-0{_}29

    1980 doi

  68. [78]

    P. N. Dunlap, L. G. Leal, Dilute polystyrene solutions in extensional flows: Birefringence and flow modification, J. Nonnewton. Fluid Mech. 23 (C) (1987) 5–48. doi: 10.1016/0377-0257(87)80009-5

    1987 doi

  69. [79]

    Harlen, J

    O. Harlen, J. Rallison, M. Chilcott, High-Deborah- number flows of dilute polymer solutions, J. Nonnewton. Fluid Mech. 34 (3) (1990) 319–349. doi:10.1016/0377-0257(90)80027-W . 28 URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/ pii/037702579080027W

    1990

  70. [80]

    Sharma, S

    V. Sharma, S. J. Haward, J. Serdy, B. Keshavarz, A. Soderlund, P. Threlfall-Holmes, G. H. McKinley, The rheology of aqueous solutions of ethyl hydroxy-ethyl cel- lulose (EHEC) and its hydrophobically modified ana- logue (hmEHEC): extensional flow response in capillary break-up...

    2015 doi

  71. [81]

    Keller, J

    A. Keller, J. A. Odell, The extensibility of macro- molecules in solution; A new focus for macromolecu- lar science, Colloid Polym. Sci. 263 (3) (1985) 181–201. doi:10.1007/BF01415506. URL http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF01415506

    1985 doi

  72. [82]

    Becherer, A

    P. Becherer, A. N. Morozov, W. van Saarloos, Scaling of singular structures in extensional flow of dilute polymer solutions, J. Nonnewton. Fluid Mech. 153 (2-3) (2008) 183–190. doi:10.1016/j.jnnfm.2007.12.009. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/ pii/S0377025707002947

    2008 doi

  73. [83]

    Becherer, W

    P. Becherer, W. van Saarloos, A. N. Morozov, Stress singularities and the formation of birefringent strands in stagnation flows of dilute polymer solutions, J. Nonnewton. Fluid Mech. 157 (1-2) (2009) 126–132. doi:10.1016/j.jnnfm.2008.09.001. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com...

    2009 doi

  74. [85]

    R. H. Ewoldt, P. Winter, J. Maxey, G. H. McKinley, Large amplitude oscillatory shear of pseudoplastic and elastoviscoplastic materials, Rheol. Acta 49 (2) (2010) 191–212. doi:10.1007/s00397-009-0403-7 . URL http://link.springer.com/10.1007/ s00397-009-0403-7

    2010 doi

  75. [86]

    Calabrese, A

    V. Calabrese, A. Q. Shen, S. J. Haward, Naturally derived colloidal rods in microfluidic flows, Biomicroflu- idics 17 (2) (mar 2023). doi:10.1063/5.0142867. URL https://pubs.aip.org/bmf/ article/17/2/021301/2878742/ Naturally-derived-colloidal-rods-in-microfluidic

    2023 doi

  76. [87]

    Calabrese, T

    V. Calabrese, T. Porto Santos, C. G. Lopez, M. P. Lettinga, S. J. Haward, A. Q. Shen, Extensibility governs the flow-induced alignment of polymers and rod-like colloids, Phys. Rev. Res. 6 (1) (2024) L012042. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.L012042. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/1...

    2024 doi

  77. [1753]

    URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/ pii/S0079670011000281

    doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.02.002. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/ pii/S0079670011000281

    2011 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.