Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 57 references

Simultaneously decoding the unknown stationary state and function parameters for mean field games

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For a quadratic mean field game, boundary Cauchy data of small perturbations around an unknown stable stationary state uniquely determine the stationary state, the running cost, and the Hamiltonian metric up to a fixed conformal class.

desk verdict New inverse MFG result on recovering stationary state and parameters, but the proof's CGO lemma is misstated and the Runge argument is void—as written the main theorem doesn't follow. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.11955 v1 pith:3K5J3XBZ submitted 2025-01-21 math.AP math.OC

Hongyu Liu , Catharine W. K. Lo This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath.OC MSC 35Q8935R3091A1635R35
keywords meanfieldgamesinverseproblemsCauchydatasetuniqueidentifiabilitycomplexgeometricopticshigh-orderlinearizationstationarysolutionsparabolicsystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves a unique-identifiability theorem for quadratic mean field games: if two configurations produce the same boundary Cauchy data from small perturbations around an unknown stable stationary state, then the stationary states and running costs coincide and the kinetic Hamiltonians agree within the fixed conformal class $C_g$ (each $A_i=\kappa_i g$ for a known metric $g$). The result matters because an observer with access only to the boundary of the state domain can in principle decode the interior equilibrium population density and value function together with the interaction cost, without knowing either in advance. The proof combines high-order linearization around the unknown stationary solution with complex geometric optics solutions and unique continuation principles. This settles the open problem left by an earlier study that recovered only the running cost while assuming the stationary state was fixed.

What carries the argument

The key object is the measurement map $M_{F,U,A}$, which records the boundary traces of $u$, $m$ and their gradients for small perturbations around the stationary state $U=(u_0,m_0)$. The argument is carried by successive high-order linearization around this unknown stationary solution: the first-order system exposes the recoverable drift $q=2A\nabla u_0$; elliptic unique continuation then fixes $u_0$ and $m_0$; and the second- and higher-order linearized systems isolate the Taylor coefficients $F^{(2)},F^{(3)},\dots$ one by one, with the parabolic unique continuation principle forcing each difference to vanish.

What would settle it

Find two admissible triples $(A_1,F_1,U_1)\ne(A_2,F_2,U_2)$ satisfying the hypotheses of Theorem 2.5 whose boundary Cauchy maps coincide; either a numerical search over quadratic MFG stationary states or an explicit construction would refute the claimed injectivity. A more targeted check is to retain the term $F^{(1)}(x)m^{(1)}(x,t)$ in the first-order linearized $u$-equation and see whether the complex-geometric-optics step can still isolate $q=2A\nabla u_0$; if not, the admissibility condition is doing essential work.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is Theorem 2.5: for two admissible configurations $(A_i,F_i,U_i)$ of the quadratic mean field game system with stable stationary solutions, equality of the boundary Cauchy maps $M_{F_1,A_1,U_1}=M_{F_2,A_2,U_2}$ forces $F_1=F_2$, $U_1=U_2$, and $A_1=A_2$ within the given conformal class $C_g$. The proof first recovers the drift vector $q=2A\nabla u_0$ from the first-order linearized system using complex geometric optics solutions, then uses elliptic unique continuation to recover $u_0$ and $m_0$ separately, and then identifies the Hamiltonian. Once $U$ and $A$ are known, the higher-order linearized systems become forced equations whose discrepancies are controlled by a parabolic unique continuation principle, yielding $F^{(k)}$ for every $k$ and hence the full analytic running cost $F$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the running cost vanishes at the unknown equilibrium density and has zero first derivative there, so the first-order linearized equation for the value perturbation does not contain a term coupling F to the density perturbation; if a real model has linear density dependence at equilibrium, this staged recovery no longer goes through.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the theorem is correct, the measurement map is injective on the admissible class: no two distinct unknown states, costs, and Hamiltonians can produce the same boundary Cauchy data.
  • An agent who can perturb the system near its stationary state and measure boundary traces can decode the interior equilibrium density, and therefore anticipate the population's aggregate behavior, without interior access.
  • The identifiability holds for the fully time-dependent quadratic MFG system, not just for stationary problems, and no probability-density normalization or Neumann boundary condition is imposed.
  • All Taylor coefficients of the analytic running cost are recoverable, so the whole interaction cost function, not just a finite-dimensional projection, is determined by the data.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: because the proof only uses the affine-in-$p$ structure of the Hamiltonian through the drift $q=2A\nabla u_0$, a similar uniqueness statement may hold for more general Hamiltonians whose momentum derivative is an unknown coefficient, provided the same admissibility conditions hold.
  • Editorial inference: the assumptions $F(x,m_0)=0$ and $F^{(1)}(x)=0$ are tailored to decouple the first-order linearized equation; a natural next problem is whether the uniqueness persists when $F$ has a nonzero linear density dependence, where the coupling would enter at first order.
  • Editorial inference: since the theorem is about injectivity, a practical follow-up is to ask whether the map is stably invertible and how much boundary data is genuinely needed; numerical experiments on random quadratic MFG instances could test the observable stability of the inversion.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies an inverse boundary value problem for a quadratic mean field game (MFG) system. It claims that from boundary Cauchy measurements of small perturbations around a stable stationary state, one can uniquely recover the stationary state U = (u0, m0), the running cost F, and the Hamiltonian metric A up to a conformal class. The proof strategy is high-order linearization around the unknown stationary solution, combined with complex geometric optics (CGO) solutions and unique continuation principles. The main result is Theorem 2.5, and the proof occupies Section 5.

Significance. If the main theorem were correctly established, the result would be a substantial advance for inverse problems of nonlinear PDEs and for mean field games in particular, going beyond the prior work [46] by recovering the unknown stationary state and Hamiltonian together with the running cost. The paper also contains useful structural observations, such as the staged recovery via the vector field q = 2A∇u0. However, the proof as written relies on inconsistent auxiliary statements and on admissibility assumptions that are tailored to the method, so the claimed uniqueness theorem is not currently supported.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 5, Theorem 5.1 (Eqs. (5.1), (5.4)–(5.6))] Theorem 5.1 as stated is internally inconsistent. It asserts the existence of nontrivial solutions w of the homogeneous forward parabolic equation with w = 0 on Σ and w(x,0) = 0 in Ω, and v of the homogeneous backward equation with v(x,T) = 0, in the exponential form (5.2) and (5.5). For a bounded domain with smooth coefficients, such initial-boundary value problems have at most one solution, and the zero data force w ≡ 0 and v ≡ 0. The displayed exponential factors with χ ∈ C_c^∞(0,T) cannot vanish on the lateral boundary in the required way. Therefore the CGO solutions used in Section 5.1 do not exist under the stated hypotheses, and the subsequent extraction of (5.18) has no valid basis.
  2. [Section 5, Lemma 5.2] The proof of Lemma 5.2 contains a false statement that voids the Hahn-Banach argument. The set X is defined as solutions W of (5.1), which includes the condition W|Σ = 0. Later the proof asserts “Since W|Σ can be arbitrary function, which is compactly supported on Σ.” This is false under the given definition of X, so the conclusion that ∂νW = 0 on Σ does not follow. Consequently, the Runge approximation property stated in Lemma 5.2 is not proved, and the paper cannot legitimately pass from H^1-regular CGO solutions to the C^{2+α,1+α/2} solutions needed in the inverse argument.
  3. [Section 5.1, derivation of (5.16)–(5.18)] The step from boundary data equality to the estimate (5.16) is not demonstrated. The inequality (5.16) is attributed to “the argument of Section 5 of [55]”, but the manuscript does not show how the measured Cauchy data imply this estimate for solutions of the admissible class. Moreover, the solution u_2^(1) used in the product term is taken from (5.5), which imposes no lateral boundary condition, while the measurement map provides boundary data; the proof must show that the first-order solution corresponding to the measured data can be chosen equal to such a CGO solution, and it must compute the resulting boundary contributions in the integration by parts leading to (5.16). Neither is done, so the extraction of q1 = q2 from (5.17) to (5.18) is not justified.
  4. [Section 2.1, Definition 2.2(ii)–(iii)] The admissibility conditions F(x, m0) = 0 and F^{(1)}(x) = 0 are load-bearing for the proof. They remove F from the stationary system (2.8) and remove the F^{(1)}m^{(1)} source term from the first-order linearized u-equation (4.8), so the staged recovery of q = 2A∇u0, then U, then A, and finally F can proceed. Since F and m0 are both unknown, this is a strong a priori restriction on the model class that is not verifiable from the boundary data. The paper does not quantify how restrictive this is or provide an example showing that the theorem covers a natural class of running costs beyond those constructed to satisfy (ii)–(iii). The central claim should be stated with this limitation made explicit, or the proof should be extended to treat F with a nonzero linear term.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2.2, Theorem 2.5] In the statement of Theorem 2.5, “A1(x) = A2(x) in Q” should refer to Ω rather than Q, since the metric depends only on x.
  2. [Section 2.1, Definition 2.2] Definition 2.2 states Y : R^n × C → C, but F in the MFG system is real-valued; this domain/codomain discrepancy should be clarified.
  3. [Section 5, Lemma 5.2 proof] In the integration by parts displayed in the proof of Lemma 5.2, the boundary term is written as ∫Σ ∂νW W dS dt, but it should involve the adjoint solution and the function W or w in a way that is consistent with the vanishing of W|Σ; as written the notation is confusing and the subsequent claim about arbitrary W|Σ is not supported.
  4. [Section 5.1, Eq. (5.16)] The estimate (5.16) is written with a “≤” that has no preceding quantity on the left; the intended statement should be made precise.
  5. [Section 1.2] The paper cites [55] for the CGO construction and Lemma 5.2 follows [43], but the exact hypotheses under which the results of [55] apply to the coupled MFG linearization are not stated; this makes it difficult for the reader to locate the missing details.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the proof is a genuine derivation that uses external CGO constructions and the authors' prior UCP as an independent lemma, not as the conclusion.

full rationale

The paper's central claim (Theorem 2.5) is proved by successive linearization around an unknown stable stationary state. The first-order linearized u-equation (4.8) has no F-dependent source only because the admissibility class in Definition 2.2 imposes F(x,m0)=0 and F^(1)(x)=0; this is an a priori modeling restriction that narrows the class of running costs, not a quantity fitted from the same boundary data and then renamed as a prediction. The recovery of q1=q2 in Section 5.1 rests on the CGO solutions quoted from the external reference [55] and on the Runge approximation argument whose proof is reproduced in Lemma 5.2 rather than merely imported. The self-cited unique continuation principle Theorem 5.3 (from the authors' [46]) is used only as a lemma for the linear coupled parabolic system (5.24); its hypotheses are general boundedness and boundary-data conditions, and its conclusion does not presuppose F1=F2 or U1=U2, so the F-recovery step is not equivalent to the theorem's inputs. The recovery of U=(u0,m0) from the elliptic equations (5.19) and (5.21) uses the boundary traces contained in the measurement map and the already recovered q; this is a standard unique-continuation step, not a circular one. No displayed equation in the proof is shown to reduce to an assumed conclusion by construction. There may be genuine correctness concerns about the CGO theorem as stated, but those are mathematical validity issues, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper adds no new physical entities. The central claim rests on a stack of analytic assumptions (admissibility, quadratic Hamiltonian, stability) and on external or self-cited theorems (CGO, UCP, Runge approximation). The most consequential cost is the admissibility condition F(x,m0)=0,F(1)=0, which is not derived from MFG practice and appears designed to make the inverse problem tractable.

assumptions (8)
  • ad hoc to paper F ∈ A (Definition 2.2): F is holomorphic in m, F(x,m0)=0, F(1)(x)=0
    These are a priori assumptions tailored to the proof. F(x,m0)=0 makes the stationary system (2.8) independent of F; F(1)=0 removes the F(1)m(1) source from the first-order linearization (4.8), enabling the CGO recovery of q=2A∇u0.
  • domain assumption Quadratic Hamiltonian H(x,p)=p^T A(x)p with A in a known conformal class Cg (eq (2.3), Definition 2.1)
    Restricts the model to kinetic-energy Lagrangians; the conformal class is a standard gauge in such inverse problems.
  • domain assumption Existence and stability of the stationary solution U=(u0,m0) (Definition 2.3)
    Stability means the linearized system (2.7) is uniquely solvable for all admissible boundary data; the theorem only applies to such solutions.
  • domain assumption Local well-posedness and holomorphy of the solution map S (Theorem 3.1)
    Proven in the paper, but requires F∈A and stability; supplies the Fréchet derivatives used in high-order linearization.
  • standard math CGO solution construction (Theorem 5.1 from [55])
    External theorem providing exponentially growing test functions for parabolic operators.
  • standard math Runge approximation (Lemma 5.2)
    Needed to pass from H1 CGO solutions to C^{2+α} solutions; the proof in the paper is flawed, so this axiom is not established by the paper.
  • standard math Unique continuation for the linearized MFG system (Theorem 5.3 from [46])
    Heavy ingredient for recovering F(2); stated in full but from the authors' own prior paper.
  • standard math Unique continuation for elliptic operators (Koch-Tataru, [36])
    Used to recover u0 and m0 from boundary Cauchy data of elliptic equations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Simultaneously decoding the unknown stationary state and function parameters for mean field games." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3K5J3XBZ

@misc{pith2026250111955,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Simultaneously decoding the unknown stationary state and function parameters for mean field games},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3K5J3XBZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.11955}
}
read the original abstract

Mean field games (MFGs) offer a versatile framework for modeling large-scale interactive systems across multiple domains. This paper builds upon a previous work, by developing a state-of-the-art unified approach to decode or design the unknown stationary state of MFGs, in addition to the underlying parameter functions governing their behavior. This result is novel, even in the general realm of inverse problems for nonlinear PDEs. By enabling agents to distill crucial insights from observed data and unveil intricate hidden structures and unknown states within MFG systems, our approach surmounts a significant obstacle, enhancing the applicability of MFGs in real-world scenarios. This advancement not only enriches our understanding of MFG dynamics but also broadens the scope for their practical deployment in various contexts.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [46]

    Hongyu Liu, Catharine W. K. Lo, and Shen Zhang. Decoding a mean field game by the Cauchy data around its unknown stationary states.Journal of the London Mathematical Society, in press , 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [51]

    Simultaneously recovering running cost and Hamiltonian in mean field games system

    Hongyu Liu and Shen Zhang. Simultaneously recovering running cost and Hamiltonian in mean field games system. Commun. Math. Sci. , (938), 2025

    work page 2025

  3. [55]

    A partial data inverse problem for the convection-diffusion equation

    Suman Kumar Sahoo and Manmohan Vashisth. A partial data inverse problem for the convection-diffusion equation. Inverse Probl. Imaging , 14(1):53–75, 2020

    work page 2020

  4. [1]

    Income and wealth distribution in macroeconomics: A continuous-time approach

    Yves Achdou, Jiequn Han, Jean-Michel Lasry, Pierre-Louis Lions, and Benjamin Moll. Income and wealth distribution in macroeconomics: A continuous-time approach. The Review of Economic Studies , 89(1):45–86, 04 2021

    work page 2021

  5. [2]

    Mean field games for modeling crowd motion

    Yves Achdou and Jean-Michel Lasry. Mean field games for modeling crowd motion. In Contributions to partial differential equations and applications , volume 47 of Comput. Methods Appl. Sci. , pages 17–42. Springer, Cham, 2019

    work page 2019

  6. [3]

    Mean field games and applications: numerical aspects

    Yves Achdou and Mathieu Lauri` ere. Mean field games and applications: numerical aspects. In Mean field games , volume 2281 of Lecture Notes in Math. , pages 249–307. Springer, Cham, [2020] ©2020

    work page 2020

  7. [4]

    Existence of positive solutions for an approximation of stationary mean-field games

    Nojood Almayouf, Elena Bachini, Andreia Chapouto, Rita Ferreira, Diogo Gomes, and et al. Existence of positive solutions for an approximation of stationary mean-field games. Involve, 10(3):473–493, 2017

    work page 2017

  8. [5]

    David M. Ambrose. Existence theory for non-separable mean field games in Sobolev spaces. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 71(2):611–647, 2022

    work page 2022

Show all 57 references
  1. [6]

    Explicit solutions of some linear-quadratic mean field games

    Martino Bardi. Explicit solutions of some linear-quadratic mean field games. Netw. Heterog. Media, 7(2):243–261, 2012

    2012

  2. [7]

    Bauso, H

    D. Bauso, H. Tembine, and T. Ba¸ sar. Opinion dynamics in social networks through mean-field games. SIAM J. Control Optim. , 54(6):3225–3257, 2016

    2016

  3. [8]

    Mean field linear quadratic games with set up costs

    Dario Bauso and Raffaele Pesenti. Mean field linear quadratic games with set up costs. Dyn. Games Appl. , 3(1):89–104, 2013

    2013

  4. [9]

    Notes on mean field games

    Pierre Cardaliaguet. Notes on mean field games. Technical report, based on the lectures by P.L. Lions at Coll` ege de France, 2010

    2010

  5. [10]

    Weak solutions for first order mean field games with local coupling

    Pierre Cardaliaguet. Weak solutions for first order mean field games with local coupling. In Analysis and geometry in control theory and its applications, pages 111–158. Springer, 2015

    2015

  6. [11]

    The master equation and the convergence problem in mean field games

    Pierre Cardaliaguet, Fran¸ cois Delarue, Jean-Michel Lasry, and Pierre-Louis Lions. The master equation and the convergence problem in mean field games . Princeton University Press, 2019

    2019

  7. [12]

    Probabilistic theory of mean field games with applications

    Ren´ e Carmona and Fran¸ cois Delarue. Probabilistic theory of mean field games with applications. I: Mean field FBSDEs, control, and games, volume 83 of Probability Theory and Stochastic Modelling . Springer, Cham, 2018

    2018

  8. [13]

    Car-oriented mean-field theory revisited

    Yu-Fung Chien and Ding-Wei Huang. Car-oriented mean-field theory revisited. Modern Physics Letters B , 18(17):887–894, 2004. 20

    2004

  9. [14]

    A numerical algorithm for inverse problem from partial boundary measurement arising from mean field game problem

    Yat Tin Chow, Samy Wu Fung, Siting Liu, Levon Nurbekyan, and Stanley Osher. A numerical algorithm for inverse problem from partial boundary measurement arising from mean field game problem. Inverse Problems, 39(1):Paper No. 014001, 21, 2023

    2023

  10. [15]

    Short-time existence for a general backward–forward parabolic system arising from mean-field games

    Marco Cirant, Roberto Gianni, and Paola Mannucci. Short-time existence for a general backward–forward parabolic system arising from mean-field games. Dyn. Games Appl. , 10(1):100–119, 2020

    2020

  11. [16]

    A mean field game inverse problem

    Lisang Ding, Wuchen Li, Stanley Osher, and Wotao Yin. A mean field game inverse problem. J. Sci. Comput. , 92(1):1–35, 2022

    2022

  12. [17]

    Ming-Hui Ding, Hongyu Liu, and Catharine W. K. Lo. Inverse problems for coupled nonlocal nonlinear systems arising in mathematical biology. arXiv: 2407.15713 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  13. [18]

    Determining internal topological structures and running cost of mean field games with partial boundary measurement

    Ming-Hui Ding, Hongyu Liu, and Guang-Hui Zheng. Determining internal topological structures and running cost of mean field games with partial boundary measurement. arXiv: 2408.08911 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  14. [19]

    Determining a Stationary Mean Field Game System from Full/Partial Boundary Measurement

    Ming-Hui Ding, Hongyu Liu, and Guang-Hui Zheng. Determining a Stationary Mean Field Game System from Full/Partial Boundary Measurement. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 57(1):661–681, 2025

    2025

  15. [20]

    Existence of weak solutions to first- order stationary mean-field games with Dirichlet conditions

    Rita Ferreira, Diogo Gomes, and Teruo Tada. Existence of weak solutions to first- order stationary mean-field games with Dirichlet conditions. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 147(11):4713–4731, 2019

    2019

  16. [21]

    Existence of weak solutions to time- dependent mean-field games

    Rita Ferreira, Diogo Gomes, and Teruo Tada. Existence of weak solutions to time- dependent mean-field games. Nonlinear Anal., 212:112470, 2021

    2021

  17. [22]

    Many-insurer robust games of reinsurance and investment under model uncertainty in incomplete markets

    Guohui Guan, Zongxia Liang, and Yi Xia. Many-insurer robust games of reinsurance and investment under model uncertainty in incomplete markets. arXiv: 2412.09157 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  18. [23]

    Robust mean field linear-quadratic-Gaussian games with unknown L2-disturbance

    Jianhui Huang and Minyi Huang. Robust mean field linear-quadratic-Gaussian games with unknown L2-disturbance. SIAM J. Control Optim. , 55(5):2811–2840, 2017

    2017

  19. [24]

    A game-theoretic framework for au- tonomous vehicles velocity control: bridging microscopic differential games and macro- scopic mean field games

    Kuang Huang, Xuan Di, Qiang Du, and Xi Chen. A game-theoretic framework for au- tonomous vehicles velocity control: bridging microscopic differential games and macro- scopic mean field games. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B , 25(12):4869–4903, 2020

    2020

  20. [25]

    Large population stochastic dynamic games: closed-loop Mckean-Vlasov systems and the Nash certainty equivalence principle

    Minyi Huang, Roland P Malham´ e, and Peter E Caines. Large population stochastic dynamic games: closed-loop Mckean-Vlasov systems and the Nash certainty equivalence principle. Commun. Inf. Syst. , 6(3):221–252, 2006

    2006

  21. [26]

    Unique continuation for a mean field game system

    Oleg Imanuvilov, Hongyu Liu, and Masahiro Yamamoto. Unique continuation for a mean field game system. Appl. Math. Lett. , 145:Paper No. 108757, 6, 2023

    2023

  22. [27]

    Lipschitz stability for determi- nation of states and inverse source problem for the mean field game equations

    Oleg Imanuvilov, Hongyu Liu, and Masahiro Yamamoto. Lipschitz stability for determi- nation of states and inverse source problem for the mean field game equations. Inverse Probl. Imaging, 18(4):824–859, 2024. 21

    2024

  23. [28]

    Global Lipschitz stability for an inverse coefficient problem for a mean field game system

    Oleg Imanuvilov and Masahiro Yamamoto. Global Lipschitz stability for an inverse coefficient problem for a mean field game system. Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences, 2024

    2024

  24. [29]

    Klibanov

    Michael V. Klibanov. A coefficient inverse problem for the mean field games system. Appl. Math. Optim. , 88(2):Paper No. 54, 28, 2023

    2023

  25. [30]

    Klibanov

    Michael V. Klibanov. The mean field games system: Carleman estimates, Lipschitz stability and uniqueness. J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl. , 31(3):455–466, 2023

    2023

  26. [31]

    Klibanov and Yurii Averboukh

    Michael V. Klibanov and Yurii Averboukh. Lipschitz stability estimate and unique- ness in the retrospective analysis for the mean field games system via two Carleman estimates. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 56(1):616–636, 2024

    2024

  27. [32]

    Klibanov, Jingzhi Li, and Hongyu Liu

    Michael V. Klibanov, Jingzhi Li, and Hongyu Liu. H¨ older stability and uniqueness for the mean field games system via Carleman estimates. Stud. Appl. Math. , 151(4):1447– 1470, 2023

    2023

  28. [33]

    Klibanov, Jingzhi Li, and Hongyu Liu

    Michael V. Klibanov, Jingzhi Li, and Hongyu Liu. An inverse problem with the final overdetermination for the mean field games system. Adv. Appl. Math. Mech. , 17:1–32, 2024

    2024

  29. [34]

    Klibanov, Jingzhi Li, and Hongyu Liu

    Michael V. Klibanov, Jingzhi Li, and Hongyu Liu. On the mean field games system with lateral Cauchy data via Carleman estimates. J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl. , 32(2):277–295, 2024

    2024

  30. [35]

    Klibanov, Jingzhi Li, and Zhipeng Yang

    Michael V. Klibanov, Jingzhi Li, and Zhipeng Yang. Convexification numerical method for the retrospective problem of mean field games. Appl. Math. Optim. , 90(1):Paper No. 6, 24, 2024

    2024

  31. [36]

    Carleman estimates and unique continuation for second-order elliptic equations with nonsmooth coefficients

    Herbert Koch and Daniel Tataru. Carleman estimates and unique continuation for second-order elliptic equations with nonsmooth coefficients. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 54(3):339–360, 2001

    2001

  32. [37]

    Mean field and n-agent games for optimal investment under relative performance criteria.Mathematical Finance, 29(4):1003–1038, 2019

    Daniel Lacker and Thaleia Zariphopoulou. Mean field and n-agent games for optimal investment under relative performance criteria.Mathematical Finance, 29(4):1003–1038, 2019

    2019

  33. [38]

    Jeux ` a champ moyen

    Jean-Michel Lasry and Pierre-Louis Lions. Jeux ` a champ moyen. I. Le cas stationnaire. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris , 343(9):619–625, 2006

    2006

  34. [39]

    Jeux ` a champ moyen

    Jean-Michel Lasry and Pierre-Louis Lions. Jeux ` a champ moyen. II–Horizon fini et contrˆ ole optimal.C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris , 343(10):679–684, 2006

    2006

  35. [40]

    Yuhan Li, Hongyu Liu, and Catharine W. K. Lo. On inverse problems in predator-prey models. J. Differential Equations , 397:349–376, 2024

    2024

  36. [41]

    Yuhan Li, Hongyu Liu, and Catharine W. K. Lo. On inverse problems in multi- population aggregation models. J. Differential Equations , 414:94–124, 2025. 22

    2025

  37. [42]

    Yuhan Li and Catharine W. K. Lo. On the simultaneous recovery of environmental factors in the 3D chemotaxis-Navier-Stokes models. Communications on Analysis and Computation, 2(1):30–47, 2024

    2024

  38. [43]

    Simultaneous recoveries for semilinear parabolic systems

    Yi-Hsuan Lin, Hongyu Liu, Xu Liu, and Shen Zhang. Simultaneous recoveries for semilinear parabolic systems. Inverse Probl., 38(11):Paper No. 115006, 39, 2022

    2022

  39. [44]

    Hongyu Liu and Catharine W. K. Lo. Determining a parabolic system by boundary observation of its non-negative solutions with biological applications. Inverse Probl. , 40(2):Paper No. 025009, 24, 2024

    2024

  40. [45]

    Hongyu Liu and Catharine W. K. Lo. Determining state space anomalies in mean field games. Nonlinearity, 38(2):025010, 2025

    2025

  41. [47]

    Inverse problems for mean field games

    Hongyu Liu, Chenchen Mou, and Shen Zhang. Inverse problems for mean field games. Inverse Probl., 39(8):Paper No. 085003, 29, 2023

    2023

  42. [48]

    Stability in determination of states for the mean field game equations

    Hongyu Liu and Masahiro Yamamoto. Stability in determination of states for the mean field game equations. Communications on Analysis and Computation , 1(2):157–167, 2023

    2023

  43. [49]

    On an inverse boundary problem for mean field games

    Hongyu Liu and Shen Zhang. On an inverse boundary problem for mean field games. arXiv: 2212.09110 , 2022

    2022 arXiv

  44. [50]

    Inverse boundary problem for a mean field game system with probability density constraint

    Hongyu Liu and Shen Zhang. Inverse boundary problem for a mean field game system with probability density constraint. arXiv: 2402.13274 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Unique determination of cost functions in a multipopulation mean field game model

    Kui Ren, Nathan Soedjak, and Kewei Wang. Unique determination of cost functions in a multipopulation mean field game model. arXiv: 2312.01622 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Reconstructing a state- independent cost function in a mean-field game model

    Kui Ren, Nathan Soedjak, Kewei Wang, and Hongyu Zhai. Reconstructing a state- independent cost function in a mean-field game model. arXiv: 2402.09297 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  47. [54]

    The master equation in a bounded domain with Neumann conditions

    Michele Ricciardi. The master equation in a bounded domain with Neumann conditions. Commun. Partial. Differ. Equ. , 47(5):912–947, 2022

    2022

  48. [56]

    Sequeira, Agust ´ ın Mu˜ noz Gonz´ alez, and Rafael Orive Illera

    Juan I. Sequeira, Agust ´ ın Mu˜ noz Gonz´ alez, and Rafael Orive Illera. Liquidity pools as mean field games: A new framework. arXiv: 2412.09180 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Quadratic mean field games

    Denis Ullmo, Igor Swiecicki, and Thierry Gobron. Quadratic mean field games. Phys. Rep., 799:1–35, 2019. 23

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.