Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 78 references

Kink dynamics for the Yang-Mills field in an extremal Reissner-Nordstr\"om black hole

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that the kink solution of the reduced Yang–Mills equation on an extremal Reissner–Nordström black hole is asymptotically stable on a finite-codimensional Lipschitz manifold of the energy space, despite its polynomial…

desk verdict A serious and substantial virial-stability paper whose central proof currently has a load-bearing gap in the coercivity transfer lemma, so the main theorem is not established as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.12790 v4 pith:SM3DJANQ submitted 2025-01-22 math.AP math-phmath.MP

Ignacio Acevedo , Claudio Muñoz This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath-phmath.MP MSC 35L7035B4037K4070S1583C57
keywords Yang-MillsextremalReissner-Nordströmblackholekinkasymptoticstabilityvirialestimatesthresholdresonancestablemanifoldvariable-coefficientwaveequation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes asymptotic stability for the kink solution of the reduced Yang–Mills wave equation describing a purely magnetic SU(2) field on the exterior of an extremal Reissner–Nordström black hole. The kink has only a polynomial tail, is not given by an explicit formula, and possesses a strongly unstable linear direction, so classical kink-stability theory does not apply. The authors prove that any global solution staying uniformly close to the kink in the weighted energy space converges to the kink on every bounded interval, and they construct a finite-codimensional Lipschitz manifold of initial data on which the kink is globally bounded and locally asymptotically stable. If the theorems are correct, they constitute the first virial-based treatment of a weak threshold resonance in this class of models and supply a concrete description of the stable side of the kink's instability.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by two virial functionals paired across scales: a large-scale functional $I$ built from $\varphi_A(x)=\int_0^x \widetilde{Q}\zeta_A^2$ acting on the localized variable $w_i=\zeta_A u_i$, and a dual functional $J$ built from a Darboux-transformed, regularized variable $v_1=(1-\gamma\partial_x^2)^{-1}U(\widetilde{\chi}_B u_1)$, with $U=\phi_0\partial_x\phi_0^{-1}$ and a localized variable $z=\widetilde{\chi}_A\zeta_B v_1$. The load-bearing identities are the Darboux factorization $L=U^*U-\mu_0^2$ and the modified linearization $\widetilde{L}=L-2\widetilde{Q}^2\widetilde{H}^2$, whose kernel contains the weak threshold resonance $\widetilde{H}$; a coercivity estimate for $\widetilde{L}$ under two orthogonality conditions, together with a transfer estimate $\int\widetilde{Q}^7u_1^2\lesssim\int\widetilde{Q}^{9/2}[(\partial_xv)^2+v^2]$, closes the control of the bad term $\int\widetilde{Q}^7u_1^2$.

What would settle it

Compute $\langle (1-\gamma\partial_x^2)^{-1}U(\widetilde{\chi}_B u),\phi_0\rangle$ for a smooth compactly supported $u$ with $\langle u,\phi_0\rangle=0$ and nonzero spatial derivative; if the inner product does not vanish for small $\gamma>0$, the transfer estimate (5.4) fails as stated and Theorem 1.1 would need a different closure.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.1: there is a $\delta>0$ such that if a global solution $\varphi\in E$ of (1.11) satisfies $\sup_{t\ge0}\|\varphi(t)-\widetilde{H}\|_{H_0\times L^2}<\delta$, then for every bounded interval $I$, $\lim_{t\to\infty}\|\varphi(t)-\widetilde{H}\|_{H^1\times L^2(I)}=0$. Theorem 1.2 sharpens this by showing that, inside a uniform neighborhood of the kink, the set of global solutions is exactly a Lipschitz graph $M=\{\widetilde{H}+\varepsilon+h(\varepsilon)Y_+ : \varepsilon\in A_0\}$ with $h(0)=0$ and $|h(\varepsilon)|\le C\|\varepsilon\|^{3/2}$, where $A_0$ is the codimension-one subspace orthogonal to $Z_+$. Together the two theorems assert that the unstable kink carries a finite-codimensional stable manifold in the energy space, on which perturbations are globally controlled and decay locally in space.

Load-bearing premise

The transfer step needs the localized, regularized transformed variable $v_1=(1-\gamma\partial_x^2)^{-1}U(\widetilde{\chi}_B u_1)$ to inherit the orthogonality $\langle v_1,\phi_0\rangle=0$ from $\langle u_1,\phi_0\rangle=0$; the paper applies Lemma 5.1 to this variable without proving that inheritance, and the control of the bad term $\int\widetilde{Q}^7u_1^2$ collapses if it fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any global solution that satisfies the uniform closeness condition of Theorem 1.1 converges to the kink on bounded intervals, so local energy eventually concentrates onto the stationary kink while the total weighted norm remains only bounded.
  • The stable manifold $M$ is Lipschitz and contains every global solution that stays within $\delta_0/2$ of the kink; within this neighborhood the global solution set is a single codimension-one graph.
  • The resonant modulation $a(t)$ associated with the zero-energy mode of $\widetilde{L}$ stays bounded and tends to zero, so the weak threshold resonance does not prevent asymptotic stability for data on the manifold.
  • Because the argument uses only the polynomial decay of $\widetilde{Q}$ and no explicit kink formula, the virial strategy extends kink-stability results beyond exponential-tail, explicitly solvable models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The fate of data outside $M$ is left open; the structure of the proof suggests that $Y_+$ is the only escape channel, so numerical runs with small nonzero $\langle\varepsilon,Z_+\rangle$ could reveal a blow-up or radiation mechanism.
  • The same combination of a modified linearization with a zero mode, a repulsive transformed potential, and a quartic positivity structure should transfer to other variable-coefficient scalar field kinks with polynomial tails.
  • Tracking constants in Lemma 5.1 and Proposition 5.3 could convert Theorem 1.1 into explicit decay rates for the local convergence, which the paper does not state.
  • The quantitative bound on the $L^2$ solution $\phi_1$ of $\widetilde{L}\phi_1=\phi_0$ could be used as a diagnostic: if $\langle\phi_1,\phi_0\rangle$ approaches zero, the resonance becomes marginal and the stable manifold construction should break down.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the Yang-Mills kink in the exterior of an extremal Reissner-Nordström black hole, following the model of Bizoń and Kahl. It claims two main results: Theorem 1.1, a conditional asymptotic stability statement for globally bounded perturbations of the kink in the energy space, and Theorem 1.2, the existence of a finite-codimensional Lipschitz stable manifold. The proof strategy is a virial approach adapted to a variable-coefficient, polynomial-tail setting: a large-scale virial functional I is combined with a dual, transformed virial functional J, and the required coercivity and repulsivity are established through a detailed spectral analysis of the linearized operator L and its supersymmetric partner L0.

Significance. If the results were fully proved, they would be a substantial contribution: asymptotic stability for an unstable kink with only polynomial tail in an inhomogeneous medium, including a virial treatment of a threshold resonance. The manuscript contains a coherent and ambitious framework, with many explicit estimates, a careful decomposition into stable and unstable modes, and an interesting use of the Darboux transform to obtain repulsivity of the transformed potential. However, the central proof is not complete as written: the key transfer estimate (5.4) is not justified, and this estimate is load-bearing for Theorem 1.1. In addition, several spectral and sign assertions rest on numerical evaluations rather than rigorous certificates. These issues prevent the paper from establishing its main claims in its current form.

major comments (4)
  1. [§5.2, Lemma 5.2, Eq. (5.4)] The proof of Lemma 5.2 applies Lemma 5.1 to the pair (u1, v1), but the v1 defined in (4.4) is v1 = (1-γ∂²)^{-1}U(χ̃_Bu1), not (1-γ∂²)^{-1}Uu1 as required by (5.1). The localization χ̃_B does not commute with U* or with (1-γ∂²)^{-1}, so the orthogonality ⟨v1, ϕ0⟩ = 0 does not follow from ⟨u1, ϕ0⟩ = 0; the alternative hypothesis ⟨χ̃_Bu1, ϕ0⟩ = 0 is also not proved. Consequently the transfer estimate (5.4) is unsupported. This is load-bearing: (5.4) is the only control for the bad term C∫eQ^7u1² in (3.21); without it, Proposition 5.3 and the closure argument leading to (5.12)-(5.13) do not go through, and Theorem 1.1 is not proved.
  2. [§5.1, Lemma 5.1] There is a mismatch between the statement and the proof of Lemma 5.1. The statement assumes ⟨v, ϕ0⟩ = 0, but the proof invokes ⟨u, ϕ0⟩ = 0 to bound the constant a in the representation u = aϕ0 - γ∂xv + ũ. These two orthogonality conditions are not equivalent under (5.1). As stated, the lemma is therefore not proved; if the intended hypothesis is ⟨u, ϕ0⟩ = 0, this must be stated explicitly, and Lemma 5.2 would still require a separate argument for the localization defect introduced by χ̃_B.
  3. [§7, Lemma 7.4 and §8] Several assertions that are used in the spectral and repulsivity arguments are justified only by numerical evaluation or graphical inspection. In particular, Lemma 7.4 (0.808 ≤ µ0 ≤ 0.883), the comparison potential inequality 2eQ²(1-eQ) ≥ -0.845Q^{7/2}_{9/2}, and the sign assertions on the auxiliary functions i1, i2, i3, k1, k2, j1, j2, m, m̂ in Section 8 are supported by phrases such as 'graph reveals', 'computing', and 'easily checked'. No interval-arithmetic or analytic certificate is provided. These inequalities are used in Lemmas 8.8, 8.9, 8.13, 8.14 and in Lemma 6.5, so the spectral/repulsivity component of the proof is not fully rigorous as written.
  4. [§4.6, end of Proposition 4.2] The final estimate in the proof of Proposition 4.2 contains the step Bα(B)(α(B)∥u1∥_{L∞}∥eQ^{3/2}w1∥)² ≲ δ^{3/2}∥eQ^{3/2}w1∥², which appears to use ∥u1∥_{L∞} ≲ δ. Assumption (3.4) only gives ∥eQ^{1/2}u1∥_{L∞} ≲ δ via Claim 3.2; ∥u1∥_{L∞} is not controlled because H0 admits functions with logarithmic growth. If the intended norm is eQ^{1/2}u1, the displayed estimate should be corrected; as written, the final bound (4.9) of Proposition 4.2 is not justified.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§5.2, Proposition 5.3] The proof of Proposition 5.3 fixes B = δ^{-1/8}, whereas Proposition 4.2 defines B = α^{-1}(δ^{-1/8}); these definitions should be reconciled, since the scale hierarchy and the estimates depend on the choice of B.
  2. [§5, before (5.1)] The sentence introducing the term ∫eQ^7u1² contains a leftover 'for n ∈ N' that is not used; please remove it.
  3. [Figure 1 caption] The caption states that ϕ0 is 'not rescaled to have unit norm', but Lemma 7.2 and the surrounding text normalize ϕ0 to have unit norm; this apparent contradiction should be clarified.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the virial derivation is self-contained, with only a non-circular correctness gap in Lemma 5.2.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. Theorem 1.1 is conditional on global existence and the uniform energy bound (1.14); the proof combines the large-scale virial estimate (3.21), the transformed-problem virial estimate (4.9), the transfer estimate (5.4), and the modulation bounds (5.8)-(5.13). No prediction is fitted: the eigenvalue bounds in Lemma 7.4 use explicit test functions and bracket mu_0 between 0.808 and 0.883 independently of the asymptotic-stability conclusion, and the existence of the negative eigenfunction comes from Krein-Rutman applied to the given operator plus the Bizon-Kahl model, not from the paper's target theorem. Citations to [37,38,39,41] are methodological lineage; the paper actually re-proves the virial and commutator estimates in its variable-coefficient, polynomial-decay setting instead of citing them as black boxes. One genuine concern appears in Lemma 5.2: v1 is defined in (4.4) as (1-gamma d_x^2)^-1 U(chi-tilde_B u1), while Lemma 5.1 requires <v,phi_0>=0 for v=(1-gamma d_x^2)^-1 U u. The text says only 'Since u1 satisfies the orthogonality condition (3.2), applying (5.2)' without proving that the localization chi_tilde_B preserves the orthogonality after passing through U and the resolvent. This is a missing proof or gap, not circularity: no step defines its conclusion into its hypothesis, and the estimate is not statistically forced by a fitted parameter. Under the stated rules, a gap without self-definition, fitted-input renaming, or load-bearing self-citation chain does not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The proof imports the reduced model from Bizon-Kahl, uses standard spectral theorems, and relies on several numerically checked sign inequalities and on a variational test function with hand-picked coefficients. No new physical entity is introduced. The numerical ingredients are not backed by code or certificates.

free parameters (2)
  • Test function coefficients in Lemma 7.4 = a4=-0.0574167, a2=0.115416, a0=-0.761391
    Chosen by hand to produce the variational bound 0.808 ≤ μ0 ≤ 0.883; the proof relies on these bounds in coercivity and sign checks. The coefficients are not derived from the model.
  • Comparison potential prefactor 0.845 = 0.845
    Added to define the lower comparison potential for L in Lemma 7.4; the required inequality is verified graphically rather than by analytic proof or shipped code.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The spherically symmetric magnetic SU(2) Yang-Mills reduction gives equation (1.10) with potential eQ^2(1-φ^2).
    Taken from Bizon-Kahl [7]; all theorems concern this reduced model, not the full four-dimensional field equations.
  • standard math Krein-Rutman theorem and Sturm-Liouville theory guarantee a simple principal negative eigenvalue with positive eigenfunction.
    Used in Lemma 7.2 to construct the exponentially decaying eigenfunction φ0.
  • standard math Kato-Agmon-Simon theorem excludes strictly positive eigenvalues for the Schrödinger operator L.
    Used in Lemma 7.3; the potential decays like |x|^{-2} and is symmetric.
  • standard math Weinstein Lemma E.1 criterion for positivity of quadratic forms under orthogonality conditions.
    Used in Lemma 6.2 to conclude ⟨eL u, u⟩ ≥ 0 under ⟨φ0, u⟩ = 0.
  • ad hoc to paper The sign inequalities for the explicit auxiliary functions i1, i2, i3, m, and m̂ are true on the stated intervals.
    Lemmas 8.8 through 8.14 and Lemma 7.4 rely on evaluating explicit functions and asserting positivity; verifications are presented as graphs, not rigorous analytic proofs or shipped code.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Kink dynamics for the Yang-Mills field in an extremal Reissner-Nordstr\"om black hole." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SM3DJANQ

@misc{pith2026250112790,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Kink dynamics for the Yang-Mills field in an extremal Reissner-Nordstr\"om black hole},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SM3DJANQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.12790}
}
read the original abstract

Considered in this work is the Yang-Mills field in an extremal Reissner-Nordstr\"om black hole, a physically motivated mathematical model introduced by Bizo\'n and Kahl. The kink is a fundamental, strongly unstable stationary solution in this non-perturbative, variable coefficients model, with a polynomial tail and no explicit form. In this paper, we introduce and extend several virial techniques, adapt them to the inhomogeneous medium setting, and construct a finite codimensional manifold of the energy space where the kink is asymptotically stable. In particular, we handle, using virial techniques, the emergence of a weak threshold resonance in the description of the stable manifold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.12790 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: Graph of ϕ0 (not rescaled to have unit norm), with associated eigenvalue ∼ −0.658 and µ0 ∼ 0.811 (see Lemma 7.4). Right: Graph of ϕ1 solution to Lϕe 1 = ϕ0, ϕ1 even, obtained with ϕ1(0) = −0.907. Lemma 6.4. There exists a constant c0 > 0 such that for any u ∈ H0(R) satisfying ⟨ϕ0, u⟩ = ⟨Qe2He 3 , u⟩ = 0, one has ⟨Lu, u e ⟩ ≥ c0∥u∥ 2 H0 . Proof. The proof relies in a similar proof by Weinstein [78, Prop. 2.9]. … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Left: Comparison between the potentials 2Qe2 (x)(1 − Qe(x)) (blue line) and −0.845Q 7/2 9/2 (x) (yellow line) in the region [0, 1.1]. Right: Plot of the difference 2Qe2 (x)(1 − Qe(x)) + 0.845Q 7/2 9/2 (x) in the considered region. Lemma 7.5. For the operator L, the associated eigenfunction ϕ0 of the first simple eigenvalue −µ 2 0 satisfies, along with its derivatives, an exponential decay given by |ϕ0(x)|, |∂xϕ0(x)|… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Left: Numerical computation of V (α(x)), V ′ (α(x)), V ′′(α(x)) where their roots are explicitly plotted in dashed vertical lines. In particular we observe that 0 < x2,1 < x0 < x1 < x2,2. Right: Numerical computation of auxiliary functions G(s) and V (α(s)) + Q2 (s) − R2 (α(s). In particular we observe that G ≤ V + Q2 + R for x ∈ (0, x2,1). In addition, if x ∈ (x2,1, x0) we know from (8.9) that −µe0 ≤ h0. Hence, rep… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: Numerical computation of j1(s), lower bound for h ′′ 0 for s in (x2,1, x0), and j2(s), lower bound for s in (0, x2,1). Right: Numerical computation of k1(s), lower bound for K(α −1 (s)) with s in (x2,1, x0), and k2(s), lower bound for K(α −1 (s)) with s in (0, x2…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left: Numerical computation of the bounds for I(α(x)) in the intervals (α −1 (x0), α−1 (x1)), (α −1 (x1), α−1 (x2,2)), and (α −1 (x2,2), ∞). Right: Numerical computation of the bounds for I(α(x)) in the intervals (0, α−1 (x2,1)) and (α −1 (x2,1), α−1 (x0)). 8.3.4. Posi…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Alammari, and S

    M. Alammari, and S. Snelson, Existence and stability of near-constant solutions of variable-coefficient scalar-field equations , to appear in Diff. Integral Eqns. (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Alammari, and S

    M. Alammari, and S. Snelson, Linear and orbital stability analysis for solitary-wave solutions of variable-coefficient scalar field equations, J. Hyperbolic Diff. Eqns., 19(1) 175–201, 2022

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Alejo, C

    M. Alejo, C. Mu˜ noz, and J. Palacios, On asymptotic stability of the sine-Gordon kink in the energy space , Commun. Math. Phys. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-023-04736-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s00220-023-04736-3 2023

  4. [4]

    Bambusi, and S

    D. Bambusi, and S. Cuccagna, On dispersion of small energy solutions to the nonlinear Klein Gordon equation with a potential , Amer. J. Math. 133 (2011), no. 5, 1421–1468

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    Bizo´ n, T

    P. Bizo´ n, T. Chmaj and A. Rostworowski, Late-time tails of a Yang-Mills field on Minkowski and Schwarzschild backgrounds , Classical and Quantum Gravity, 24 (2007), no. 13, F55

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    Bizo´ n, T

    P. Bizo´ n, T. Chmaj, and N. Szpak,Dynamics near the threshold for blow up in the one-dimensional focusing nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation. J. Math. Phys. 52 (2011), 103703

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    Bizo´ n and M

    P. Bizo´ n and M. Kahl, A Yang–Mills field on the extremal Reissner–Nordstr¨ om black hole , Classical and Quantum Gravity, 33 (2016), no. 17, 175013

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Berestycki, P.L

    H. Berestycki, P.L. Lions, Nonlinear scalar field equations, II existence of infinitely many solutions , Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 82, 347–375 (1983), https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00250556

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00250556 1983

Show all 78 references
  1. [9]

    S. M. Chang, S. Gustafson, K. Nakanishi, and T. P. Tsai, Spectra of linearized operators for NLS solitary waves , SIAM J. Math. Anal., 39 (2007/8), no. 4, 1070-1111

    2007

  2. [10]

    G. Chen, J. Jendrej, Strichartz estimates for Klein-Gordon equations with moving potentials , arXiv:2210.03462

    arXiv

  3. [11]

    G. Chen, J. Jendrej, Asymptotic stability and classification of multi-solitons for Klein-Gordon equations , arXiv:2301.10279

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    G. Chen, J. Liu, and B. Lu, Long-time asymptotics and stability for the sine-Gordon equation , Preprint arXiv:2009.04260

    2009 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Chen, and J

    G. Chen, and J. Luhrmann, Asymptotic stability of the sine-gordon kink , preprint https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.07004 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Christodoulou, Solutions globales des equations de champ de Yang-Mills , C

    D. Christodoulou, Solutions globales des equations de champ de Yang-Mills , C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris A 293, 39 (1981)

    1981

  7. [15]

    P. T. Chru´ sciel and J. Shatah, Global existence of solutions of the Yang–Mills equations on globally hyperbolic four dimensional Lorentzian manifolds, Asian journal of Mathematics, 1 (1997), no. 3, 530–548

    1997

  8. [16]

    Cuccagna, On asymptotic stability in 3D of kinks for the ϕ4 model, Trans

    S. Cuccagna, On asymptotic stability in 3D of kinks for the ϕ4 model, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 360 (2008), no. 5, 2581–2614

    2008

  9. [17]

    Cuccagna, M

    S. Cuccagna, M. Maeda, Asymptotic stability of kink with internal modes under odd perturbation , Nonlinear Differ. Equ. Appl. 30, 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00030-022-00806-y

    2023 doi

  10. [18]

    Cuccagna, M

    S. Cuccagna, M. Maeda, A survey on asymptotic stability of ground states of nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations. II Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 14(5):1693–1716, 2021

    2021

  11. [19]

    R. A. Daly et al., New black hole spin values for Sagittarius A∗ obtained with the outflow method , MNRAS 527, 428–436 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Deimling

    K. Deimling. Solutions in Cones. Nonlinear Functional Analysis , 217-255 (1985)

    1985

  13. [21]

    Delort, and N

    J.-M. Delort, and N. Masmoudi, Long-time dispersive estimates for perturbations of a kink solution of one-dimensional cubic wave equations, Memoirs of the European Mathematical Society, 1. EMS Press, Berlin, (2022). ix+280 pp. ISBN: 978-3-98547-020-4; 978-3-98547-520-9

    2022

  14. [22]

    Dunford and J

    N. Dunford and J. T Schwartz, Spectral theory: self adjoint operators in Hilbert space , Interscience publishers, 1963

    1963

  15. [23]

    Duyckaerts, C

    T. Duyckaerts, C. Kenig, Y. Martel, and F. Merle, Soliton resolution for critical co-rotational wave maps and radial cubic wave equation. Comm. Math. Phys. 391 (2022), no. 2, 779–871

    2022

  16. [24]

    D. M. Eardley and V. Moncrief, The global existence of Yang-Mills-Higgs fields in 4-dimensional Minkowski space , Comm. Math. Phys., 83 (1982), no. 2, 171–191

    1982

  17. [25]

    Germain, A review on asymptotic stability of solitary waves in nonlinear dispersive problems in dimension one , https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.04508 (2024)

    P. Germain, A review on asymptotic stability of solitary waves in nonlinear dispersive problems in dimension one , https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.04508 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Germain, F

    P. Germain, F. Pusateri, and K. Z. Zhang, On 1d Quadratic Klein-Gordon Equations with a Potential and Symmetries . Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 247 (2023), no. 2, 17

    2023

  19. [27]

    Germain, and F

    P. Germain, and F. Pusateri, Quadratic Klein-Gordon equations with a potential in one dimension . Forum Math. Pi 10 (2022), Paper No. e17, 172 pp

    2022

  20. [28]

    Hayashi and P

    N. Hayashi and P. Naumkin, The initial value problem for the cubic nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation , Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 59 (2008), no. 6, 1002–1028

    2008

  21. [29]

    Hayashi and P

    N. Hayashi and P. Naumkin, The initial value problem for the quadratic nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation, Adv. Math. Phys. (2010), Art. ID 504324, 35

    2010

  22. [30]

    Hayashi and P

    N. Hayashi and P. Naumkin, Quadratic nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation in one dimension , J. Math. Phys. 53 (2012), no. 10, 103711, 36. YANG-MILLS KINK DYNAMICS 57

    2012

  23. [31]

    Ibrahim, N

    S. Ibrahim, N. Masmoudi, and K. Nakanishi, Scattering threshold for the focusing nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation , Anal. PDE 4 (2011), no. 3, 405–460

    2011

  24. [32]

    D. B. Henry, J.F. Perez and W. F. Wreszinski, Stability Theory for Solitary-Wave Solutions of Scalar Field Equations , Comm. Math. Phys. 85, 351–361 (1982)

    1982

  25. [33]

    Jendrej, and A

    J. Jendrej, and A. Lawrie, Soliton resolution for energy-critical wave maps in the equivariant case. , arXiv:2106.10738 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Kairzhan and F

    A. Kairzhan and F. Pusateri, Asymptotic stability near the soliton for quartic Klein-Gordon in 1D , preprint arXiv:2206.15008 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Kopylova and A

    E. Kopylova and A. I. Komech, On asymptotic stability of kink for relativistic Ginzburg-Landau equations , Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 202 (2011), no. 1, 213–245

    2011

  28. [36]

    Kopylova, and A.I

    E. Kopylova, and A.I. Komech, On asymptotic stability of moving kink for relativistic Ginzburg-Landau equation. Comm. Math. Phys. 302 (2011), no. 1, 225–252

    2011

  29. [37]

    Kowalczyk, and Y

    M. Kowalczyk, and Y. Martel, Kink dynamics under odd perturbations for (1+1)-scalar field models with one internal mode , Preprint arXiv:2203.04143

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    Kowalczyk, Y

    M. Kowalczyk, Y. Martel, and C. Mu˜ noz,Kink dynamics in the ϕ4 model: Asymptotic stability for odd perturbations in the energy space, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 30 (2017), 769-798

    2017

  31. [39]

    Kowalczyk, Y

    M. Kowalczyk, Y. Martel, and C. Mu˜ noz, Soliton dynamics for the 1D NLKG equation with symmetry and in the absence of internal modes, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 24 (2022), no. 6, 2133–2167

    2022

  32. [40]

    Kowalczyk, Y

    M. Kowalczyk, Y. Martel, and C. Mu˜ noz,On asymptotic stability of nonlinear waves , S´ eminaire Laurent Schwartz—´Equations aux d´ eriv´ ees partielles et applications. Ann´ ee 2016–2017, Ed.´Ec. Polytech., Palaiseau, 2017, pp. Exp. No. XVIII, 27

    2016

  33. [41]

    Kowalczyk, Y

    M. Kowalczyk, Y. Martel, C Mu˜ noz, and H. Van Den Bosch, A Sufficient Condition for Asymptotic Stability of Kinks in General (1+1)-Scalar Field Models . Ann. PDE 7, 10 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40818-021-00098-y

    2021 doi

  34. [42]

    Krieger, K

    J. Krieger, K. Nakanishi, and W. Schlag, Global dynamics above the ground state energy for the one-dimensional NLKG equation. Math. Z. 272 (2012), no. 1-2, 297–316

    2012

  35. [43]

    Krieger, W

    J. Krieger, W. Schlag, and D. Tataru, Renormalization and blow up for the critical Yang-Mills problem , Adv. Math. 221(2009), no.5, 1445–1521

    2009

  36. [44]

    Krein, and M

    M. Krein, and M. Rutman. Linear operators leaving invariant a cone in a Banach space , Uspekhi mat. nauk, 3(1), 3-95 (1948)

    1948

  37. [45]

    L´ eger, and F

    T. L´ eger, and F. Pusateri, Internal modes and radiation damping for quadratic Klein-Gordon in 3D , preprint arXiv:2112.13163 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  38. [46]

    L´ eger, and F

    T. L´ eger, and F. Pusateri, Internal mode-induced growth in 3d nonlinear Klein–Gordon equations , Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei Rend. Lincei Mat. Appl. 33 (2022), no. 3, 695–727

    2022

  39. [47]

    Li and J

    Y. Li and J. L¨ uhrman, Soliton dynamics for the 1D quadratic Klein-Gordon equation with symmetry , Journal of Differential Equations 344 (2023), 172-202

    2023

  40. [48]

    Lindblad, J

    H. Lindblad, J. L¨ uhrmann, W. Schlag, and A. Soffer, On Modified Scattering for 1D Quadratic Klein-Gordon Equations With Non-Generic Potentials , Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2023, no. 6, 5118–5208

    2023

  41. [49]

    Lindblad, J

    H. Lindblad, J. L¨ uhrmann, and A. Soffer,Decay and asymptotics for the 1D Klein-Gordon equation with variable coefficient cubic nonlinearities, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 52 (2020), no. 6, 6379–6411

    2020

  42. [50]

    Lindblad, J

    H. Lindblad, J. L¨ uhrmann, and A. Soffer, Asymptotics for 1D Klein-Gordon equations with variable coefficient quadratic nonlin- earities, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 241 (2021), no. 3, 1459–1527

    2021

  43. [51]

    Lindblad, and A

    H. Lindblad, and A. Soffer, A remark on asymptotic completeness for the critical nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation , Letters Math. Phys. 73 (2005), no. 3, 249–258

    2005

  44. [52]

    Lindblad, and A

    H. Lindblad, and A. Soffer, A remark on long range scattering for the nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation , J. Hyperbolic Diff. Eqns. 2 (2005), no. 1, 77–89

    2005

  45. [53]

    Lindblad, and A

    H. Lindblad, and A. Soffer, Scattering for the Klein-Gordon equation with quadratic and variable coefficient cubic nonlinearities , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 367 (2015), no. 12, 8861–8909

    2015

  46. [54]

    Lindbland, and T

    H. Lindbland, and T. Tao, Asymptotic decay for a one-dimensional nonlinear wave equation , Anal. and PDE Vol. 5 (2012), No. 2, 411–422, doi: 10.2140/apde.2012.5.411

    2012 doi

  47. [55]

    M. A. Lohe, Soliton structures in P (φ)2, Physical Review D, 20 (1979), 3120–3130

    1979

  48. [56]

    L¨ uhrmann and W

    J. L¨ uhrmann and W. Schlag,Asymptotic stability of the sine-Gordon kink under odd perturbations . Duke Math. J. 172 (2023), no. 14, 2715–2820

    2023

  49. [57]

    L¨ uhrmann and W

    J. L¨ uhrmann and W. Schlag,On codimension one stability of the soliton for the 1D focusing cubic Klein-Gordon equation . Comm. Amer. Math. Soc. 4 (2024), 230–356

    2024

  50. [58]

    Nakanishi, and W

    K. Nakanishi, and W. Schlag, Invariant manifolds and dispersive Hamiltonian evolution equations. Z¨ urich Lectures in Advanced Mathematics. European Mathematical Society (EMS), Z¨ urich, 2011

    2011

  51. [59]

    P¨ oschl and E

    G. P¨ oschl and E. Teller, Bemerkungen zur Quantenmechanik des anharmonischen Oszillators , Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik,83 (1933), no. 3, 143–151

    1933

  52. [60]

    Manton and P

    N. Manton and P. Sutcliffe, Topological solitons, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Camb. U. Press, Cambridge, 2004

    2004

  53. [61]

    Martel, Asymptotic stability of solitary waves for the 1D cubic-quintic Schr¨ odinger equation with no internal mode

    Y. Martel, Asymptotic stability of solitary waves for the 1D cubic-quintic Schr¨ odinger equation with no internal mode . Probab. Math. Phys. 3 (2022), no. 4, 839–867

    2022

  54. [62]

    Martel, Asymptotic stability of small standing solitary waves of the one-dimensional cubic-quintic Schr¨ odinger equation, preprint arXiv:2312.11016 (2023)

    Y. Martel, Asymptotic stability of small standing solitary waves of the one-dimensional cubic-quintic Schr¨ odinger equation, preprint arXiv:2312.11016 (2023). https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.11016

    2023 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Maul´ en,Asymptotic stability manifolds for solitons in the generalized Good Boussinesq equation , J

    C. Maul´ en,Asymptotic stability manifolds for solitons in the generalized Good Boussinesq equation , J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 177 (2023), 260–328

    2023

  56. [64]

    Maul´ en, and C

    C. Maul´ en, and C. Mu˜ noz,Asymptotic stability of the fourth order ϕ4 kink for general perturbations in the energy space , Annales IHP Analyse Nonlin´ eaire (online first)https://doi.org/10.4171/aihpc/112

    doi

  57. [65]

    Mu˜ noz, and J.M

    C. Mu˜ noz, and J.M. Palacios,Nonlinear stability of 2-solitons of the Sine-Gordon equation in the energy space , Ann. IHP C Analyse Nonlin´ eaire. 36 (2019), no. 4, 977–1034. 58 IGNACIO ACEVEDO AND CLAUDIO MU ˜NOZ

    2019

  58. [66]

    S. J. Oh, and D. Tataru, The threshold conjecture for the energy critical hyperbolic Yang-Mills equation . Ann. of Math. (2) 194 (2021), no. 2, 393–473

    2021

  59. [67]

    S. J. Oh, and D. Tataru, The hyperbolic Yang-Mills equation in the caloric gauge: local well-posedness and control of energy- dispersed solutions. Pure Appl. Anal. 2 (2020), no. 2, 233–384

    2020

  60. [68]

    S. J. Oh, and D. Tataru, The hyperbolic Yang-Mills equation for connections in an arbitrary topological class . Comm. Math. Phys. 365 (2019), no. 2, 685–739

    2019

  61. [69]

    J. M. Palacios, and F. Pusateri, Local Energy control in the presence of a zero-energy resonance , arXiv:2401.02623 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Rapha¨ el, and I

    P. Rapha¨ el, and I. Rodnianski, Stable blow up dynamics for the critical co-rotational wave maps and equivariant Yang-Mills problems. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci. 115 (2012), 1–122

    2012

  63. [71]

    M. Reed, B. Simon. Methods of modern mathematical physics: Functional analysis. IV: Analysis of Operators , Elsevier 4 1978

    1978

  64. [72]

    Soffer and M

    A. Soffer and M. I. Weinstein, Time dependent resonance theory , Geom. Funct. Anal. 8 (1998), no. 6, 1086–1128

    1998

  65. [73]

    Soffer, and M.I

    A. Soffer, and M.I. Weinstein, Resonances, radiation damping and instability in Hamiltonian nonlinear wave equations , Invent. Math. 136, no. 1, 9–74 (1999)

    1999

  66. [74]

    Snelson, Asymptotic stability for odd perturbations of the the stationary kink in the variable-speed ϕ4 model, Transactions of the AMS 370(10) 7437-7460, 2018

    S. Snelson, Asymptotic stability for odd perturbations of the the stationary kink in the variable-speed ϕ4 model, Transactions of the AMS 370(10) 7437-7460, 2018

    2018

  67. [75]

    Srednicki

    M. Srednicki. Quantum field theory . Cambridge University Press, 2007

    2007

  68. [76]

    Vachaspati, Kinks and domain walls , Cambridge University Press, New York, 2006, An introduction to classical and quantum solitons

    T. Vachaspati, Kinks and domain walls , Cambridge University Press, New York, 2006, An introduction to classical and quantum solitons

    2006

  69. [77]

    C. N. Yang and R. L Mills, Conservation of isotopic spin and isotopic gauge invariance , Physical review, 96 (1954), no. 1, 191

    1954

  70. [78]

    M. I. Weinstein, Modulational stability of ground states of nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations , SIAM J. Math. Anal., 16 (1985), 472–491. Laboratoire de Math´ematiques d’Orsay (UMR 8628), Universit ´e Paris-Saclay, CNRS, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France. Email address : ignacio-andres...

    1985

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.