Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 77 references

Implications of Magnetic Flux-Disk Mass Correlation in Black Hole-Neutron Star Mergers for GRB sub-populations

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that black hole-neutron star mergers, regardless of disk mass, reach a magnetically arrested state on a universal timescale and therefore all produce long-duration gamma-ray bursts.

desk verdict Solid new simulation: dimensionless BH flux is nearly disk-mass independent at 20 ms, but the 10 s MAD timescale that carries the 'all BH-NS mergers are long GRBs' claim is a borrowed extrapolation, not a measured outcome. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.13154 v1 pith:7ZWSKESW submitted 2025-01-22 astro-ph.HE gr-qc

Manuel R. Izquierdo , Carlos Palenzuela , Steven Liebling , Ore Gottlieb , Miguel Bezares This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEgr-qc
keywords blackhole-neutronstarmergersgamma-rayburstsdimensionlessmagneticfluxmagneticallyarresteddiskturbulentdynamoamplificationnumericalrelativityGRBdurationlong-durationGRBs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses high-resolution numerical-relativity simulations of black hole-neutron star mergers to ask whether the magnetic flux threading the black hole depends on the mass of the accretion disk left behind. Across disks spanning nearly two orders of magnitude in mass, the dimensionless magnetic flux evolves almost identically, settling near values $\phi\lesssim 1$ in the first 20 milliseconds after merger. Combined with longer simulations that show this flux keeps growing roughly as $t^\xi$, the paper argues that every BH-NS disk reaches a magnetically arrested state at about 10 seconds, the timescale that sets gamma-ray burst duration in the unified compact-binary GRB picture. If correct, this means BH-NS mergers contribute exclusively to the new class of long-duration compact-binary GRBs, with disk mass determining only how bright the jet is, not how long it lasts.

What carries the argument

The central object is the dimensionless magnetic flux on the black hole, $\phi = \Phi_B / \sqrt{\dot M r^2}$, with $\Phi_B$ the magnetic flux through a sphere near the horizon, $\dot M$ the mass accretion rate, and $r$ the radius. It measures how magnetically saturated the accretion flow is; $\phi \approx 50$ marks a magnetically arrested disk (MAD). The paper's argument rides on two empirical patterns: $\phi$ evolves almost identically across disks whose masses differ by nearly two orders of magnitude, and in longer simulations $\phi$ grows roughly as $t^\xi$ with $\xi\approx0.75$-$1$ while the accretion rate decays as $t^{-\zeta}$ with $\zeta\approx1.5$-$2$. Combined with the established relation between the MAD transition time and GRB duration, these patterns convert a measured universality of $\phi$ into a predicted universality of burst duration.

What would settle it

Run or identify a BH-NS evolution lasting at least several seconds and measure whether $\phi$ actually reaches about 50 by roughly 10 seconds; a flattening below the MAD value for a low-mass disk would falsify the universal-timing claim. Observationally, a confirmed BH-NS merger associated with a short (under 2-second) GRB would contradict the prediction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the evolution of the dimensionless magnetic flux on the black hole, $\phi$, is quasi-universal across post-merger disk masses: even though the disk mass changes by a factor of about 45 between the lowest and highest black-hole spin runs, $\phi$ at 20 ms is close to the same value ($\phi \approx 0.6$). Taking the flux growth rates reported by longer-duration simulations, $\phi \propto t^\xi$ with $\xi \simeq 0.75$-$1$, and the threshold for a magnetically arrested disk, $\phi\approx50$, the paper infers a universal transition time $t_{\rm MAD}\gtrsim10$ s. Since the transition to MAD marks the end of the prompt GRB emission, the paper concludes that all BH-NS mergers produce long-duration GRBs, and that the recently proposed unified picture of compact-binary GRBs assigns BH-NS mergers to the long-duration class while NS-NS mergers remain the likely engines of short GRBs.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion rests on the assumption that the dimensionless magnetic flux keeps growing as a power law, from about 0.6 at 20 milliseconds to the magnetically arrested value near 50 at about 10 seconds, even though these simulations stop at 40 milliseconds and do not resolve the instability expected to power that growth.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every BH-NS merger would reach the magnetically arrested state on a common timescale of about 10 seconds, making the burst duration universal regardless of disk mass.
  • BH-NS mergers would populate only the long-duration class of compact-binary GRBs, not the standard short-duration class.
  • The mass of the post-merger disk would set the jet's power and observability, so low-mass disks produce long GRBs that are too faint to detect.
  • NS-NS mergers would remain the most plausible central engines of ordinary short GRBs, consistent with kilonova observations.
  • The observed saturation of the magnetic field, which converges with resolution, indicates that turbulent dynamo amplification from realistic ~$10^{11}$ G initial fields can produce ~$10^{14}$ G fields in the disk.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The main unprobed axis is generality across mass ratio and equation of state; a natural next suite varies the mass ratio and NS stiffness while keeping the same realistic initial magnetic field.
  • If the 10-second MAD timescale is confirmed, electromagnetic follow-up strategies for BH-NS gravitational-wave events should expect long GRBs, not short ones, and plan late-time observations accordingly.
  • The unresolved magnetorotational instability flagged in the paper's Figure 9 makes the power-law extrapolation the most vulnerable link; a cheaper test would be much longer low-resolution evolutions to see whether $\phi$ continues rising.
  • A luminosity cutoff follows from the disk-mass dependence: mergers with $M_{\rm disk}\lesssim10^{-3}\,M_\odot$ should be electromagnetically dark long-GRB engines, so their existence would be inferred statistically rather than by direct detection.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents numerical-relativity GRMHD simulations of black hole–neutron star (BH–NS) mergers with mass ratio q = 3, APR4 equation of state, and BH spins a/MBH = 0.2, 0.35, 0.5, producing post-merger disk masses spanning roughly a factor of 45 (Mdisk ≈ 0.001–0.04 M⊙). The simulations use a realistic initial NS magnetic field of ~10^11 G, a spatial resolution of 90 m (the highest reported for such mergers), and large-eddy-simulation subgrid terms. The authors find that the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability during disk formation drives turbulent dynamo amplification to average fields ~10^14 G by ~20 ms, with a roughly resolution-converged saturation value. The central observed quantity is the dimensionless magnetic flux on the BH, φ, which at t = 20 ms is φ ≈ 0.75, 0.58, 0.57 for the three spins, i.e., quasi-universal across disk mass. Assuming φ ∝ t^ξ with ξ ≈ 0.75–1 from longer external simulations, the authors extrapolate to a magnetically arrested state (φ ≈ 50) at t_MAD ≳ 10 s and, using the Gottlieb et al. (2023) framework, conclude that all BH–NS mergers produce long-duration GRBs. The numerical early-time results are credible and well supported; the population-level conclusion rests on an unvalidated extrapolation over roughly three orders of magnitude in time.

Significance. If the central claim were fully established, it would provide a unified population-level picture in which BH–NS mergers exclusively power long-duration compact-binary GRBs, leaving NS–NS mergers as the engines of short GRBs. The paper's numerical strengths are substantial: state-of-the-art resolution (90 m), a realistic seed field rather than ad hoc strong fields, LES modeling of subgrid turbulence, and a resolution study suggesting convergence of the saturated field to ~30%. The measured quasi-universality of φ at ~20 ms across a wide disk-mass range is a valuable, falsifiable numerical result in its own right. However, the headline conclusion is not a measured outcome of these 40 ms runs; it depends on an assumed power-law growth of φ sustained by an instability (the MRI) that the simulations themselves show is unresolved. The significance of the paper is therefore high if the extrapolation is correct, but the evidence presented is insufficient to establish that extrapolation.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. IV] The load-bearing step from the measured φ ≈ 0.6–0.75 at t = 20 ms to the claimed MAD state φ ≈ 50 at t ≳ 10 s is the assumption φ ∝ t^ξ with ξ ≈ 0.75–1, borrowed from longer simulations [1,26,38,74]. This power law is not measured in the present 40 ms runs; indeed, Fig. 6 shows that the growth of φ slows markedly after ~20 ms, and Fig. 9 shows λ_MRI < Δx = 90 m, i.e., the MRI expected to sustain flux growth on longer timescales is unresolved. The authors acknowledge in Sec. IV that 'even higher resolutions might be needed to capture this instability.' Because the ξ-based extrapolation is the only bridge between the simulated regime and the MAD threshold, the abstract's conclusion that all BH–NS mergers contribute to long-duration GRBs is not supported by the simulations as they stand. The authors should either provide direct evidence for the continued power-law growth (e.g., longer evolutions with a subgrid/MRI-capturing scheme) or explicitly frame the population-level claim as a conditional prediction that depends on the unverified continuation.
  2. [Sec. IV] The quasi-universality of φ is established only for three BH spins with fixed mass ratio q = 3 and a single equation of state (APR4). The statement in Sec. IV that 'this quasi-universal evolution holds across various equations of state and mass ratios' is an unsupported assumption, not a result of this work. Since the conclusion 'all BH–NS mergers produce long-duration GRBs' requires exactly that broader universality, the paper should either present simulations varying q or EoS (even with a coarser resolution as a check) or clearly downgrade the abstract's claim to a parameter-dependent conjecture. The current wording of the abstract presents a speculative extrapolation as an established implication.
  3. [Section II.D] The definition of the dimensionless flux, φ = Φ_B / sqrt(r^2 Ṁ), is ambiguous because the text states that Ṁ_acr is computed on a sphere at R ≈ 9 km, while Φ_B is evaluated on a sphere 'slightly beyond the apparent horizon.' If these two radii differ, the r in the denominator of Eq. (7) is not uniquely defined. Since the absolute values of φ in Table I and Fig. 6 are central to the extrapolation, the authors should specify the exact radius used for the normalization, and ideally evaluate both quantities on the same surface to demonstrate the sensitivity of φ to this choice.
  4. [Sec. III.B] The convergence exponent Δx^1.25 quoted for the saturated magnetic field is inferred from only three resolutions (240, 180, and 90 m), with the two finest values very close together. The claim of 'slightly better than linear' convergence and the resulting 'within 30%' error estimate rest on a fit to essentially two points and are not robust. The authors should report the saturation values at all three resolutions in a table or text, and discuss how the uncertainty in the saturation field propagates into φ (and hence into the MAD timescale). This is a secondary point relative to the extrapolation above, but it affects the credibility of the quantitative error estimate.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the disk mass spans 'nearly two orders of magnitude,' but Table I gives M_disk = 9.4×10^-4 M⊙ to 4.2×10^-2 M⊙, a factor of ~45 (about 1.7 decades). Please rephrase to 'a factor of ~45' or 'nearly two decades' for accuracy.
  2. [Sec. II.C] The text says the code uses 'fourth-order-accurate operators for the spatial derivatives in the SGS terms and in the Einstein equations' but the fluid reconstruction is fifth-order (MP5) with HRSC. It would be clearer to state the order for each sector separately.
  3. [Fig. 9] The caption says the MRI wavelength is 'comparable to the minimum resolution,' while the figure appears to show λ_MRI slightly below Δx = 90 m for most of the evolution. The text in Sec. III.C already notes that λ_MRI is not resolved; please make the caption consistent (e.g., 'comparable to or smaller than Δx').
  4. [Sec. III.B] The power-law fits E_rot ∝ (M_disk)^0.9 and E_th ∝ (M_disk)^0.85 and M_disk ∝ (a/M_BH)^5 are based on only three data points spanning a limited spin range. These scalings should be presented as indicative trends rather than robust laws, or the number of simulations should be increased.
  5. [Introduction] There is a typo in the first paragraph: 'Ligo-Virgo-Kagra (L VK)' should be 'LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA (LVK).'

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Central numerical result is measured, but the population-level conclusion is carried by a self-cited framework and an assumed growth law, making the GRB prediction an imported extrapolation rather than a derived consequence.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section IV (Discussion), final paragraph]
    "Since the transition to MAD marks the end of the prompt GRB emission [1], the universality of this transition time for all BH–NS mergers would indicate that all BH–NS mergers produce long-duration GRBs."

    The step from 't_MAD is universal' to 'all BH–NS mergers produce long-duration GRBs' relies entirely on Ref. [1], a paper co-authored by current author O. Gottlieb. The simulations themselves end at 40 ms with phi about 0.6, far from the MAD threshold phi approximately 50, so the population conclusion is not a direct numerical output; it is the self-cited framework's mapping. The measured quasi-universality of phi provides independent evidence for one premise, but the decisive premise—MAD time sets GRB duration—is imported from the authors' own prior work without independent verification in this paper.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section IV (Discussion), paragraph beginning 'Our simulations show...']
    "In particular, beginning with values we obtain at t = 20 ms and assuming phi proportional to t^xi with xi approximately 0.75 to 1 as found in other, longer duration numerical simulations (i.e., see for example [1, 26, 38, 74]), one expects a MAD state at t greater than or approximately 10 s [1]."

    The predicted t_MAD is not measured; it is the assumed power law phi proportional to t^xi evaluated from the measured 20 ms normalization. The same growth law is drawn in part from Ref. [1], the self-cited framework, and from longer simulations that this paper does not reproduce. Fig. 9 explicitly shows that the MRI, the proposed driver of late-time flux growth, is not resolved at this resolution, and Sec. IV concedes that higher resolutions may be needed to capture it. Thus the 'universal timescale' is an input assumption combined with the measured normalization, not a prediction derived from the new simulations.

full rationale

The core numerical claim—quasi-universal evolution of the dimensionless magnetic flux phi across two decades of disk mass at t approximately 20 ms—is a measured, self-contained result and is not circular. The values in Table I (0.75, 0.58, 0.57) come from the simulations, not from a fit to the conclusion. However, the paper's headline inference about GRB sub-populations depends on two imported elements: (i) the Gottlieb et al. framework (Ref. [1], co-authored by a current author) mapping MAD timescale to GRB duration, and (ii) the phi proportional to t^xi extrapolation law, partly taken from the same group's longer simulations. The simulations stop at 40 ms with phi approximately 0.6, far below the MAD threshold phi approximately 50, and the paper's own Fig. 9 and Sec. IV state that the MRI is not resolved, so the mechanism expected to sustain the assumed growth is unverified here. The conclusion that all BH-NS mergers produce long-duration GRBs is therefore a motivated extrapolation built on self-cited and borrowed inputs, though the measured quasi-universality itself is an independent numerical finding. This warrants a moderate circularity score rather than a higher one.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's direct new data are the phi(t) curves to 40 ms and the saturation field values. The central conclusion about lbGRBs is assembled by borrowing the late-time accretion power law and the MAD framework from prior work, much of it co-authored by the current authors, and by assuming universality across EOS and mass ratio. These are the unpaid debts the headline claim depends on.

free parameters (3)
  • Convergence exponent for saturation field = 1.25
    Power-law exponent fitted to the saturation averaged field at Δx = 240, 180, 90 m (Fig. 5, bottom). Used to estimate the true saturation value within 30%.
  • Disk mass vs BH spin scaling exponent = 5
    Empirical fit Mdisk ∝ (a/MBH)^5 across the three runs. Ancillary to the main claim but reported as a result.
  • Dimensionless flux growth exponent ξ = 0.75-1 (adopted from Refs [1,26,38,74])
    Assumed power law phi ∝ t^ξ used to extrapolate from phi ≈ 0.6 at 20 ms to phi ≈ 50 at t_MAD ≈ 10 s. Not fitted here, but the central lbGRB conclusion depends on it.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math General relativistic MHD and CCZ4 evolution equations with Bona-Masso slicing and Gamma-driver shift.
    Sec. II.A. Standard formulation; no new physics introduced.
  • domain assumption APR4 equation of state used as a piecewise polytrope (cold part).
    Sec. II.B. Only one EOS; generalization to other EOS is assumed, not tested.
  • domain assumption Initial magnetic field is purely poloidal with average B = 10^11 G inside the neutron star.
    Sec. II.B. Chosen as an upper bound for old NS fields; no toroidal component or field geometry variation.
  • domain assumption Accretion rate decays as Mdot ∝ t^{-ζ} with ζ ≈ 1.5-2 and the dimensionless flux grows as phi ∝ t^ξ with ξ ≈ 0.75-1 up to MAD.
    Sec. III.B and Sec. IV. Taken from longer simulations in Refs [1,26,38,74]. This is the load-bearing bridge for the 10 s MAD timescale.
  • domain assumption The dimensionless flux measured at a sphere at R ≈ 9 km is representative of the flux threading the black hole horizon.
    Sec. II.D. Assumes no significant magnetic flux loss between this surface and the horizon.
  • ad hoc to paper The quasi-universal phi evolution persists across other equations of state and mass ratios.
    Sec. IV states 'Assuming that this quasi-universal evolution holds across various equations of state and mass ratios.' Only q = 3 and APR4 are simulated.
  • domain assumption MRI, though unresolved (λ_MRI smaller than the grid spacing), will provide the late-time growth needed to reach MAD.
    Fig. 9 shows λ_MRI is comparable to or smaller than the grid spacing, so MRI is not captured; the paper assumes its dynamo action still yields the same phi growth as in longer simulations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Implications of Magnetic Flux-Disk Mass Correlation in Black Hole-Neutron Star Mergers for GRB sub-populations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7ZWSKESW

@misc{pith2026250113154,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Implications of Magnetic Flux-Disk Mass Correlation in Black Hole-Neutron Star Mergers for GRB sub-populations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7ZWSKESW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.13154}
}
abstract

We perform numerical relativity simulations of black hole-neutron star (BH-NS) mergers with a fixed mass ratio of $q = 3$, varying the BH spin to produce a wide range of post-merger accretion disk masses. Our high-order numerical scheme, fine resolution, and Large Eddy Simulation techniques enable us to achieve likely the most resolved BH-NS merger simulations to date, capturing the post-merger magnetic field amplification driven by turbulent dynamo processes. Following tidal disruption and during disk formation, the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability in the spiral arm drives a turbulent state in which the magnetic field, initialized to a realistic average value of $10^{11}\, \rm{G}$, grows to an average of approximately $10^{14}\, \rm{G}$ in the first $\approx 20\, \mathrm{ms}$ post-merger. Notably, the dimensionless magnetic flux on the BH, $ \phi $, evolves similarly across nearly two orders of magnitude in disk mass. This similarity, along with estimates from longer numerical simulations of the decay of the mass accretion rate, suggests a universal timescale at which the dimensionless flux saturates at a magnetically arrested state (MAD) such that $ \phi \approx 50 $ at $t_{\rm MAD} \gtrsim 10\,{\rm s}$. The unified framework of Gottlieb et al. (2023) established that the MAD timescale sets the duration of the resulting compact binary gamma-ray burst (cbGRB), implying that all BH-NS mergers contribute to the recently detected new class of long-duration cbGRBs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.13154 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A Unified Picture of Short and Long Gamma-Ray Bursts from Compact Binary Mergers,

    O. Gottlieb, B. D. Metzger, E. Quataert, D. Issa, T. Martineau, F. Foucart, M. D. Duez, L. E. Kidder, H. P. Pfeiffer, and M. A. Scheel, “A Unified Picture of Short and Long Gamma-Ray Bursts from Compact Binary Mergers,” Astrop. J. Lett. 958 no. 2, (Dec.,

    work page

  2. [2]

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from Two Neutron Star–Black Hole Coalescences,

    LIGO Scientific, KAGRA, VIRGO Collaboration, R. Abbott et al. , “Observation of Gravitational Waves from Two Neutron Star–Black Hole Coalescences,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 915 no. 1, (2021) L5, arXiv:2106.15163 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2021

  3. [3]

    GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run,

    KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific Collaboration, R. Abbott et al. , “GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run,” Phys. Rev. X 13 no. 4, (2023) 041039, arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Neutron star-black hole mergers in next generation gravitational-wave observatories,

    I. Gupta, S. Borhanian, A. Dhani, D. Chattopadhyay, R. Kashyap, V. A. Villar, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, “Neutron star-black hole mergers in next generation gravitational-wave observatories,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 12, (2023) 124007, arXiv:2301.08763 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Population Properties of Gravitational-Wave Neutron Star--Black Hole Mergers

    J.-P. Zhu, S. Wu, Y. Qin, B. Zhang, H. Gao, and Z. Cao, “Population Properties of Gravitational-wave Neutron Star–Black Hole Mergers,” Astrophys. J. 928 no. 2, (2022) 167, arXiv:2112.02605 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 2.5–4.5 M ⊙ Compact Object and a Neutron Star,

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo,, KAGRA, VIRGO Collaboration, A. G. Abac et al. , “Observation of Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 2.5–4.5 M ⊙ Compact Object and a Neutron Star,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 970 no. 2, (2024) L34, arXiv:2404.04248 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    A kilonova following a long-duration gamma-ray burst at 350 Mpc,

    J. C. Rastinejad, B. P. Gompertz, A. J. Levan, W.-f. Fong, M. Nicholl, G. P. Lamb, D. B. Malesani, A. E. Nugent, S. R. Oates, N. R. Tanvir, A. de Ugarte Postigo, C. D. Kilpatrick, C. J. Moore, B. D. Metzger, M. E. Ravasio, A. Rossi, G. Schroeder, J. Jencson, D. J. Sand, N. Smith, J. F. Ag¨ u ´ ı Fern´ andez, E. Berger, P. K. Blanchard, R. Chornock, B. E. ...

    arXiv 2022

  8. [8]

    Unified Kilonova–GRB Model Establishes Neutron Stars as Short GRB Central Engines,

    O. Gottlieb, B. D. Metzger, F. Foucart, and E. Ramirez-Ruiz, “Unified Kilonova–GRB Model Establishes Neutron Stars as Short GRB Central Engines,” Astrop. J. Lett. (2024) , arXiv:2411.13657 [astro-ph.HE]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.13657

    arXiv 2024

Show all 77 references
  1. [9]

    Numerical evolutions of a black hole-neutron star system in full General Relativity: I. Head-on collision,

    F. Loffler, L. Rezzolla, and M. Ansorg, “Numerical evolutions of a black hole-neutron star system in full General Relativity: I. Head-on collision,” arXiv:gr-qc/0606104

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    Merger of black hole-neutron star binaries: Nonspinning black hole case,

    M. Shibata and K. Uryu, “Merger of black hole-neutron star binaries: Nonspinning black hole case,” Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 121503, arXiv:gr-qc/0612142

    2006 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Fully General Relativistic Simulations of Black Hole-Neutron Star Mergers,

    Z. B. Etienne, J. A. Faber, Y. T. Liu, S. L. Shapiro, K. Taniguchi, and T. W. Baumgarte, “Fully General Relativistic Simulations of Black Hole-Neutron Star Mergers,” Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 084002, arXiv:0712.2460 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Evolving black hole-neutron star binaries in general relativity using pseudospectral and finite difference methods,

    M. D. Duez, F. Foucart, L. E. Kidder, H. P. Pfeiffer, M. A. Scheel, and S. A. Teukolsky, “Evolving black hole-neutron star binaries in general relativity using pseudospectral and finite difference methods,” Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 104015, arXiv:0809.0002 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  5. [13]

    General relativistic simulations of black-hole-neutron-star mergers: Effects of black-hole spin,

    Z. B. Etienne, Y. T. Liu, S. L. Shapiro, and T. W. Baumgarte, “General relativistic simulations of black-hole-neutron-star mergers: Effects of black-hole spin,” Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 044024, arXiv:0812.2245 [astro-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  6. [14]

    General relativistic simulations of black hole-neutron star mergers: Effects of magnetic fields,

    Z. B. Etienne, Y. T. Liu, V. Paschalidis, and S. L. Shapiro, “General relativistic simulations of black hole-neutron star mergers: Effects of magnetic fields,” Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 064029, arXiv:1112.0568 [astro-ph.HE]

    2012 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Black Hole-Neutron Star Mergers: Disk Mass Predictions,

    F. Foucart, “Black Hole-Neutron Star Mergers: Disk Mass Predictions,” Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 124007, arXiv:1207.6304 [astro-ph.HE]

    2012 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Neutron star-black hole mergers with a nuclear equation of state and neutrino cooling: Dependence in the binary parameters,

    F. Foucart, M. B. Deaton, M. D. Duez, E. O’Connor, C. D. Ott, R. Haas, L. E. Kidder, H. P. Pfeiffer, M. A. Scheel, and B. Szilagyi, “Neutron star-black hole mergers with a nuclear equation of state and neutrino cooling: Dependence in the binary parameters,” Phys. Rev. D 90 (20...

    2014 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Relativistic Simulations of Black Hole–neutron Star Coalescence: the jet Emerges,

    V. Paschalidis, M. Ruiz, and S. L. Shapiro, “Relativistic Simulations of Black Hole–neutron Star Coalescence: the jet Emerges,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 806 no. 1, (2015) L14, arXiv:1410.7392 [astro-ph.HE]

    2015 arXiv

  10. [18]

    High resolution numerical-relativity simulations for the merger of binary magnetized neutron stars,

    K. Kiuchi, K. Kyutoku, Y. Sekiguchi, M. Shibata, and T. Wada, “High resolution numerical-relativity simulations for the merger of binary magnetized neutron stars,” Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 041502, 13 arXiv:1407.2660 [astro-ph.HE]

    2014 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Dynamical mass ejection from black hole-neutron star binaries,

    K. Kyutoku, K. Ioka, H. Okawa, M. Shibata, and K. Taniguchi, “Dynamical mass ejection from black hole-neutron star binaries,” Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 044028, arXiv:1502.05402 [astro-ph.HE]

    2015 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Eccentric mergers of black holes with spinning neutron stars,

    W. E. East, V. Paschalidis, and F. Pretorius, “Eccentric mergers of black holes with spinning neutron stars,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 807 no. 1, (2015) L3, arXiv:1503.07171 [astro-ph.HE]

    2015 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Dynamical ejecta from precessing neutron star-black hole mergers with a hot, nuclear-theory based equation of state,

    F. Foucart, D. Desai, W. Brege, M. D. Duez, D. Kasen, D. A. Hemberger, L. E. Kidder, H. P. Pfeiffer, and M. A. Scheel, “Dynamical ejecta from precessing neutron star-black hole mergers with a hot, nuclear-theory based equation of state,” Class. Quant. Grav. 34 no. 4, (2017) 04...

    2017 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Remnant baryon mass in neutron star-black hole mergers: Predictions for binary neutron star mimickers and rapidly spinning black holes,

    F. Foucart, T. Hinderer, and S. Nissanke, “Remnant baryon mass in neutron star-black hole mergers: Predictions for binary neutron star mimickers and rapidly spinning black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 98 no. 8, (2018) 081501, arXiv:1807.00011 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Black hole-neutron star coalescence: effects of the neutron star spin on jet launching and dynamical ejecta mass,

    M. Ruiz, V. Paschalidis, A. Tsokaros, and S. L. Shapiro, “Black hole-neutron star coalescence: effects of the neutron star spin on jet launching and dynamical ejecta mass,” Phys. Rev. D 102 no. 12, (2020) 124077, arXiv:2011.08863 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Black hole-neutron star simulations with the BAM code: First tests and simulations,

    S. V. Chaurasia, T. Dietrich, and S. Rosswog, “Black hole-neutron star simulations with the BAM code: First tests and simulations,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 8, (2021) 084010, arXiv:2107.08752 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  17. [25]

    On accretion discs formed in MHD simulations of black hole–neutron star mergers with accurate microphysics,

    E. R. Most, L. J. Papenfort, S. D. Tootle, and L. Rezzolla, “On accretion discs formed in MHD simulations of black hole–neutron star mergers with accurate microphysics,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 506 no. 3, (2021) 3511–3526, arXiv:2106.06391 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Hayashi, K

    K. Hayashi, K. Kiuchi, K. Kyutoku, Y. Sekiguchi, and M. Shibata, “General-relativistic neutrino-radiation magnetohydrodynamics simulation of seconds-long black hole-neutron star mergers: Dependence on the initial magnetic field strength, configuration, and neutron-star equatio...

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Black Hole-Neutron Star Binaries near Neutron Star Disruption Limit in the Mass Regime of Event GW230529,

    T. Martineau, F. Foucart, M. Scheel, M. Duez, L. Kidder, and H. Pfeiffer, “Black Hole-Neutron Star Binaries near Neutron Star Disruption Limit in the Mass Regime of Event GW230529,” arXiv:2405.06819 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    Black hole-neutron star mergers with massive neutron stars in numerical relativity,

    S. Chen, L. Wang, K. Hayashi, K. Kawaguchi, K. Kiuchi, and M. Shibata, “Black hole-neutron star mergers with massive neutron stars in numerical relativity,” Phys. Rev. D 110 no. 6, (2024) 063016, arXiv:2404.18714 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Signatures of low-mass black hole–neutron star mergers,

    R. Matur, I. Hawke, and N. Andersson, “Signatures of low-mass black hole–neutron star mergers,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 534 no. 3, (2024) 2894–2903, arXiv:2407.18045 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Black hole - neutron star binaries with high spins and large mass asymmetries: II. Properties of dynamical simulations,

    K. Topolski, S. Tootle, and L. Rezzolla, “Black hole - neutron star binaries with high spins and large mass asymmetries: II. Properties of dynamical simulations,” arXiv:2409.06777 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    Black hole-neutron star binaries with high spins and large mass asymmetries: I. Properties of quasi-equilibrium sequences,

    K. Topolski, S. Tootle, and L. Rezzolla, “Black hole-neutron star binaries with high spins and large mass asymmetries: I. Properties of quasi-equilibrium sequences,” arXiv:2409.06767 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    Black hole pulsars and monster shocks as outcomes of black hole-neutron star mergers,

    Y. Kim, E. R. Most, A. M. Beloborodov, and B. Ripperda, “Black hole pulsars and monster shocks as outcomes of black hole-neutron star mergers,” arXiv:2412.05760 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    A brief overview of black hole-neutron star mergers,

    F. Foucart, “A brief overview of black hole-neutron star mergers,” Front. Astron. Space Sci. 7 (2020) 46, arXiv:2006.10570 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Coalescence of black hole–neutron star binaries,

    K. Kyutoku, M. Shibata, and K. Taniguchi, “Coalescence of black hole–neutron star binaries,” Living Rev. Rel. 24 no. 1, (2021) 5, arXiv:2110.06218 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Black hole-neutron star binaries,

    M. D. Duez, “Black hole-neutron star binaries,” arXiv:2404.14782 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    Large eddy simulations of magnetized mergers of black holes and neutron stars,

    M. R. Izquierdo, M. Bezares, S. Liebling, and C. Palenzuela, “Large eddy simulations of magnetized mergers of black holes and neutron stars,” Phys. Rev. D 110 no. 8, (2024) 083017, arXiv:2403.09770 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    High resolution magnetohydrodynamic simulation of black hole-neutron star merger: Mass ejection and short gamma ray bursts,

    K. Kiuchi, Y. Sekiguchi, K. Kyutoku, M. Shibata, K. Taniguchi, and T. Wada, “High resolution magnetohydrodynamic simulation of black hole-neutron star merger: Mass ejection and short gamma ray bursts,” Phys. Rev. D 92 no. 6, (2015) 064034, arXiv:1506.06811 [astro-ph.HE]

    2015 arXiv

  30. [38]

    General-relativistic neutrino-radiation magnetohydrodynamic simulation of seconds-long black hole-neutron star mergers,

    K. Hayashi, S. Fujibayashi, K. Kiuchi, K. Kyutoku, Y. Sekiguchi, and M. Shibata, “General-relativistic neutrino-radiation magnetohydrodynamic simulation of seconds-long black hole-neutron star mergers,” Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 2, (July, 2022) 023008, arXiv:2111.04621 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Turbulent magnetic-field amplification in the first 10 milliseconds after a binary neutron star merger: Comparing high-resolution and large-eddy simulations,

    R. Aguilera-Miret, D. Vigan` o, F. Carrasco, B. Mi˜ nano, and C. Palenzuela, “Turbulent magnetic-field amplification in the first 10 milliseconds after a binary neutron star merger: Comparing high-resolution and large-eddy simulations,” Physical Review D 102 no. 10, (2020) 103006

    2020

  32. [40]

    Turbulent magnetic field amplification in binary neutron star mergers,

    C. Palenzuela, R. Aguilera-Miret, F. Carrasco, R. Ciolfi, J. V. Kalinani, W. Kastaun, B. Mi˜ nano, and D. Vigan` o, “Turbulent magnetic field amplification in binary neutron star mergers,” Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 2, (2022) 023013, arXiv:2112.08413 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Universality of the Turbulent Magnetic Field in Hypermassive Neutron Stars Produced by Binary Mergers,

    R. Aguilera-Miret, D. Vigan` o, and C. Palenzuela, “Universality of the Turbulent Magnetic Field in Hypermassive Neutron Stars Produced by Binary Mergers,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 926 no. 2, (2022) L31, arXiv:2112.08406 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Large eddy simulations of magnetized mergers of neutron stars with neutrinos,

    C. Palenzuela, S. Liebling, and B. Mi˜ nano, “Large eddy simulations of magnetized mergers of neutron stars with neutrinos,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 10, (2022) 103020, arXiv:2204.02721 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Role of turbulence and winding in the development of large-scale, strong magnetic fields in long-lived remnants of binary neutron star mergers,

    R. Aguilera-Miret, C. Palenzuela, F. Carrasco, and D. Vigan` o, “Role of turbulence and winding in the development of large-scale, strong magnetic fields in long-lived remnants of binary neutron star mergers,” Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 10, (Nov., 2023) 103001, arXiv:2307.04837 [ast...

    2023 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Delayed jet launching in binary neutron star mergers with realistic initial magnetic fields,

    R. Aguilera-Miret, C. Palenzuela, F. Carrasco, S. Rosswog, and D. Vigan` o, “Delayed jet launching in binary neutron star mergers with realistic initial magnetic fields,” Phys. Rev. D 110 no. 8, (2024) 083014, arXiv:2407.20335 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Jet from binary neutron star merger with 14 prompt black hole formation,

    K. Hayashi, K. Kiuchi, K. Kyutoku, Y. Sekiguchi, and M. Shibata, “Jet from binary neutron star merger with 14 prompt black hole formation,” arXiv:2410.10958 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    MHDuet website: A distributed AMR, GRMHD code with LES and neutrinos,

    “ MHDuet website: A distributed AMR, GRMHD code with LES and neutrinos,” 2025. http://mhduet.liu.edu/

    2025

  39. [47]

    Effects of high density phase transitions on neutron star dynamics,

    S. L. Liebling, C. Palenzuela, and L. Lehner, “Effects of high density phase transitions on neutron star dynamics,” Classical and Quantum Gravity 38 no. 11, (June, 2021) 115007, arXiv:2010.12567 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  40. [49]

    A simflowny-based finite-difference code for high-performance computing in numerical relativity,

    C. Palenzuela, B. Mi˜ nano, D. Vigan` o, A. Arbona, C. Bona-Casas, A. Rigo, M. Bezares, C. Bona, and J. Mass´ o, “A simflowny-based finite-difference code for high-performance computing in numerical relativity,” Classical and Quantum Gravity 35 no. 18, (2018) 185007. http: //s...

    2018

  41. [50]

    Toward fidelity and scalability in non-vacuum mergers,

    S. L. Liebling, C. Palenzuela, and L. Lehner, “Toward fidelity and scalability in non-vacuum mergers,” Classical and Quantum Gravity 37 no. 13, (Jun, 2020) 135006. https://doi.org/10.1088%2F1361-6382%2Fab8fcd

    2020

  42. [51]

    New public code for initial data of unequal-mass, spinning compact-object binaries,

    L. J. Papenfort, S. D. Tootle, P. Grandcl´ ement, E. R. Most, and L. Rezzolla, “New public code for initial data of unequal-mass, spinning compact-object binaries,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 2, (2021) 024057, arXiv:2103.09911 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  43. [52]

    Kadath: A spectral solver for theoretical physics,

    P. Grandcl´ ement, “Kadath: A spectral solver for theoretical physics,” Journal of Computational Physics 229 no. 9, (2010) 3334–3357. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0021999110000203

    2010

  44. [53]

    General-covariant evolution formalism for numerical relativity,

    C. Bona, T. Ledvinka, C. Palenzuela, and M. ˇZ´ aˇ cek, “General-covariant evolution formalism for numerical relativity,” Phys. Rev. D 67 (May, 2003) 104005. https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.67.104005

    2003 doi

  45. [54]

    Conformal and covariant formulation of the z4 system with constraint-violation damping,

    D. Alic, C. Bona-Casas, C. Bona, L. Rezzolla, and C. Palenzuela, “Conformal and covariant formulation of the z4 system with constraint-violation damping,” Phys. Rev. D 85 (Mar, 2012) 064040. https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.064040

    2012 doi

  46. [55]

    Final fate of compact boson star mergers,

    M. Bezares, C. Palenzuela, and C. Bona, “Final fate of compact boson star mergers,” Phys. Rev. D 95 (Jun,

  47. [56]

    Constraint damping in the z4 formulation and harmonic gauge,

    C. Gundlach, G. Calabrese, I. Hinder, and J. M. Mart ´ ın-Garc ´ ıa, “Constraint damping in the z4 formulation and harmonic gauge,” Classical and Quantum Gravity 22 no. 17, (2005) 3767. http://stacks.iop.org/0264-9381/22/i=17/a=025

    2005

  48. [57]

    New Formalism for Numerical Relativity,

    C. Bona, J. Mass´ o, E. Seidel, and J. Stela, “New Formalism for Numerical Relativity,” Physical Review Letters 75 (July, 1995) 600–603, gr-qc/9412071

    1995 arXiv

  49. [58]

    https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.124005

    124005. https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.124005

    doi

  50. [59]

    Effects of the microphysical equation of state in the mergers of magnetized neutron stars with neutrino cooling,

    C. Palenzuela, S. L. Liebling, D. Neilsen, L. Lehner, O. L. Caballero, E. O’Connor, and M. Anderson, “Effects of the microphysical equation of state in the mergers of magnetized neutron stars with neutrino cooling,” Phys. Rev. D 92 no. 4, (Aug., 2015) 044045, arXiv:1505.01607 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  51. [60]

    A Simflowny-based finite-difference code for high-performance computing in numerical relativity,

    C. Palenzuela, B. Mi˜ nano, D. Vigan` o, A. Arbona, C. Bona-Casas, A. Rigo, M. Bezares, C. Bona, and J. Mass´ o, “A Simflowny-based finite-difference code for high-performance computing in numerical relativity,” Classical and Quantum Gravity 35 no. 18, (Sept., 2018) 185007, ar...

    2018 arXiv

  52. [61]

    Gauge conditions for long-term numerical black hole evolutions without excision,

    M. Alcubierre, B. Br¨ ugmann, P. Diener, M. Koppitz, D. Pollney, E. Seidel, and R. Takahashi, “Gauge conditions for long-term numerical black hole evolutions without excision,” Phys. Rev. D 67 (Apr, 2003) 084023. https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.67.084023

    2003 doi

  53. [62]

    Dynamical mass ejection from black hole-neutron star binaries,

    K. Kyutoku, K. Ioka, H. Okawa, M. Shibata, and K. Taniguchi, “Dynamical mass ejection from black hole-neutron star binaries,” Physical Review D 92 no. 4, (Aug, 2015) . https://doi.org/10.1103%2Fphysrevd.92.044028

    2015

  54. [63]

    A method for estimating time–frequency characteristics of compact binary mergers to improve searches for inspiral, merger and ring-down phases separately,

    C. Hanna, M. Megevand, E. Ochsner, and C. Palenzuela, “A method for estimating time–frequency characteristics of compact binary mergers to improve searches for inspiral, merger and ring-down phases separately,” Classical and Quantum Gravity 26 no. 1, (Dec., 2008) 015009. http:...

    2008 doi

  55. [64]

    General relativistic MHD large eddy simulations with gradient subgrid-scale model,

    D. Vigan` o, R. Aguilera-Miret, F. Carrasco, B. Mi˜ nano, and C. Palenzuela, “General relativistic MHD large eddy simulations with gradient subgrid-scale model,” Phys. Rev. D 101 no. 12, (June, 2020) 123019, arXiv:2004.00870 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  56. [65]

    Simflowny 2: An upgraded platform for scientific modelling and simulation,

    A. Arbona, B. Mi˜ nano, A. Rigo, C. Bona, C. Palenzuela, A. Artigues, C. Bona-Casas, and J. Mass´ o, “Simflowny 2: An upgraded platform for scientific modelling and simulation,” Computer Physics Communications 229 (Aug., 2018) 170–181, arXiv:1702.04715 [cs.MS]

    2018 arXiv

  57. [66]

    Managing application complexity in the samrai object-oriented framework,

    R. D. Hornung and S. R. Kohn, “Managing application complexity in the samrai object-oriented framework,” Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 14 no. 5, (2002) 347–368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpe.652

    2002 doi

  58. [67]

    Simflowny: A general-purpose platform for the management of physical models and simulation problems,

    A. Arbona, A. Artigues, C. Bona-Casas, J. Mass´ o, B. Mi˜ nano, A. Rigo, M. Trias, and C. Bona, “Simflowny: A general-purpose platform for the management of physical models and simulation problems,” Computer Physics Communications 184 (Oct., 2013) 2321–2331

    2013

  59. [68]

    A Simflowny-based high-performance 3D code for the generalized induction equation,

    D. Vigan` o, D. Mart ´ ınez-G´ omez, J. A. Pons, C. Palenzuela, F. Carrasco, B. Mi˜ nano, A. Arbona, C. Bona, and J. Mass´ o, “A Simflowny-based high-performance 3D code for the generalized induction equation,” Computer Physics Communications 237 (Apr, 2019) 168–183, arXiv:181...

    2019 arXiv

  60. [69]

    Shu, Essentially non-oscillatory and weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws, pp

    C.-W. Shu, Essentially non-oscillatory and weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws, pp. 325–432. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0096355

    1998 doi

  61. [70]

    Advances in patch-based adaptive mesh refinement scalability,

    B. T. Gunney and R. W. Anderson, “Advances in patch-based adaptive mesh refinement scalability,” Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing 89 (2016) 65 – 84. http://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0743731515002129

    2016

  62. [71]

    A high-order finite-volume method for conservation laws on locally refined grids,

    P. McCorquodale and P. Colella, “A high-order finite-volume method for conservation laws on locally refined grids,” Commun. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 6 no. 1, (2011) 1–25. https://doi.org/10.2140/camcos.2011.6.1

    2011 doi

  63. [72]

    Toward a consistent framework for high order mesh refinement schemes in numerical relativity,

    B. Mongwane, “Toward a consistent framework for high order mesh refinement schemes in numerical relativity,” General Relativity and Gravitation 47 (May, 2015) 60, arXiv:1504.07609 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  64. [73]

    Accurate monotonicity-preserving schemes with runge–kutta time stepping,

    A. Suresh and H. Huynh, “Accurate monotonicity-preserving schemes with runge–kutta time stepping,” Journal of Computational Physics 136 no. 1, 15 (1997) 83 – 99. http://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0021999197957454

    1997

  65. [74]

    Large-scale Evolution of Seconds-long Relativistic Jets from Black Hole-Neutron Star Mergers,

    O. Gottlieb, D. Issa, J. Jacquemin-Ide, M. Liska, F. Foucart, A. Tchekhovskoy, B. D. Metzger, E. Quataert, R. Perna, D. Kasen, M. D. Duez, L. E. Kidder, H. P. Pfeiffer, and M. A. Scheel, “Large-scale Evolution of Seconds-long Relativistic Jets from Black Hole-Neutron Star Merg...

    2023 arXiv

  66. [75]

    Enhancement of a Magnetic Field by a Conducting Fluid,

    A. P. Kazantsev, “Enhancement of a Magnetic Field by a Conducting Fluid,” Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 26 (May, 1968) 1031

    1968

  67. [76]

    Efficient generation of jets from magnetically arrested accretion on a rapidly spinning black hole,

    A. Tchekhovskoy, R. Narayan, and J. C. McKinney, “Efficient generation of jets from magnetically arrested accretion on a rapidly spinning black hole,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 418 no. 1, (Nov., 2011) L79–L83, arXiv:1108.0412 [astro-ph.HE]

    2011 arXiv

  68. [79]

    The Spectrum of Random Magnetic Fields in the Mean Field Dynamo Theory of the Galactic Magnetic Field,

    R. M. Kulsrud and S. W. Anderson, “The Spectrum of Random Magnetic Fields in the Mean Field Dynamo Theory of the Galactic Magnetic Field,” Astrophys. J. 396 (Sept., 1992) 606

    1992

  69. [2023]

    L33, arXiv:2309.00038 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.