Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 8 minor 1 cited by

Gluon polarization contribution to the spin alignment of vector mesons from holography

T0 review · 2 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Rotation of the hot medium should raise phi meson spin alignment at high momentum through rotation-induced gluon polarization, while J/psi mesons remain nearly unaffected.

desk verdict First holographic spin-alignment calculation in a rotating medium, with new pT/Omega curves for phi, rho, and J/psi, but the rotation effect rests on a hand-tuned dilaton and the paper never checks whether the in-medium phi peak shifts with Omega, which could make the claimed high-pT enhancement off-peak sampling. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.13401 v2 pith:2ZU7ILJY submitted 2025-01-23 hep-ph

Hiwa A. Ahmed , Yidian Chen , Mei Huang This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph
keywords spinalignmentvectormesonssoft-wallholographicQCDrotatingquark-gluonplasmagluonpolarizationspectralfunctionrho_00phimeson
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Using a four-flavor soft-wall holographic QCD model — a gravity-dual description of strongly coupled QCD — in an anisotropic rotating background, this paper tries to show that rotation of the quark-gluon plasma changes how vector mesons melt and how they align their spins. The central result is that the $\phi$ meson's spin-alignment parameter $\rho_{00}$, averaged over azimuthal angle for spins quantized along the event-plane axis, is weakly temperature-dependent at low $p_T$ but suppressed at high $p_T$, and that rotation enhances $\rho_{00}$ at high $p_T$ through angular-momentum transfer mediated by spin-orbit coupling. The $J/\psi$ meson is found to be insensitive to both temperature and rotation up to $p_T = 5$ GeV, while the $\rho$ meson behaves qualitatively like the $\phi$ meson. If correct, the calculation ties a measurable heavy-ion observable to the gluonic response to vorticity and offers a nonperturbative explanation for the puzzling spin alignment of the $\phi$ meson.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the rotation-dependent dilaton field of Eq. (8), $\Phi = (\mu_G + \mu_\Omega \Omega^2)^2 z^2 \tanh(\mu_{G2}^2 z^2/(\mu_G + \mu_\Omega \Omega^2)^2)$, with $\mu_\Omega = 10$ GeV$^{-1}$ chosen so the model reproduces the lattice-QCD trend that the deconfinement temperature rises with $\Omega$. The dilaton is the gravity-side scalar dual to the gluonic operator, so its $\Omega$ dependence is the mechanism through which gluon polarization enters the spin alignment. Around this field the paper builds a five-dimensional gravity background with a metric, a dilaton, and a $U(1)$ gauge field whose angular component is $A_\theta = \Omega r^2$, then probes it with the four-flavor soft-wall vector action whose heavy scalar mass matrix distinguishes $\rho$, $\phi$, and $J/\psi$. The spectral functions obtained through the standard holographic prescription for retarded correlators are projected onto spin states and converted into $\rho_{00}$ through the dilepton decay angular distribution.

What would settle it

Measure the azimuthally averaged $\rho_{00}$ of $\phi$ mesons at $p_T \gtrsim 3$ GeV in heavy-ion events grouped by global angular momentum at similar temperature: the model predicts a monotonic rise with angular velocity, so a flat or decreasing signal would falsify the rotation-induced gluon-polarization mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the gluon polarization induced by a rotating medium, encoded in a rotation-dependent dilaton field in a five-dimensional gravity dual, produces a characteristic spin-alignment signature for vector mesons. In the event-plane frame, with spin quantized along the event-plane axis, the azimuthally averaged $\rho_{00}$ of the $\phi$ meson stays close to $1/3$ at low $p_T$, drops below $1/3$ at high $p_T$, and rises again when the angular velocity $\Omega$ is switched on at fixed temperature; the same rotation also delays the thermal melting of $\rho$ and $\phi$, raising their dissociation temperatures. The heavy $J/\psi$, by contrast, keeps $\rho_{00}$ and the equivalent $\lambda_\theta$ essentially unchanged up to $p_T = 5$ GeV, with only a small high-$p_T$ suppression under rotation, which the authors attribute to the charm quark's large mass. The qualitative difference between $\phi$ and $J/\psi$ is traced to the difference in their in-medium spectral functions.

Load-bearing premise

Every rotation effect is injected through the hand-chosen scalar dilaton field in Eq. (8) and its fitted coupling $\mu_\Omega = 10$ GeV$^{-1}$, so if that functional form or that number is wrong, the predicted rotation enhancement of $\rho_{00}$ at high $p_T$ would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Rotation raises the dissociation temperature of the $\phi$ and $\rho$ mesons, so a rotating medium should still show meson peaks in spectral functions at temperatures where a non-rotating medium no longer has them.
  • The azimuthally averaged $\rho_{00}$ of the $\phi$ meson decreases with temperature and increases with angular velocity at fixed temperature, giving separate, testable signatures for the two medium properties.
  • The $J/\psi$ meson's spin alignment stays essentially at the unpolarized value up to $p_T = 5$ GeV, making it a control channel for medium-induced alignment.
  • The predicted $\rho$ meson alignment follows the $\phi$ pattern with stronger thermal and rotational responses, offering a benchmark for future measurements.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Since the only rotation dependence enters through the gluonic dilaton, this calculation implies that light-vector-meson spin alignment in a rotating plasma is primarily a gluon-polarization effect; quark-dominated mechanisms would predict a different mass ordering.
  • The fitted parameter $\mu_\Omega = 10$ GeV$^{-1}$ turns the spin-alignment prediction into a sharp test: lattice data on $T_c(\Omega)$ from real angular velocity would either calibrate the remaining freedom or expose the ansatz.
  • Extending the calculation away from the near-center approximation, where the metric depends on radius, would show whether the azimuthal pattern of $\rho_{00}$ is stable or an artifact of the rotation-axis treatment.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 8 minor

Summary. The paper presents a soft-wall holographic QCD model with four flavors in a rotating, anisotropic background obtained from the Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton action. Rotation is implemented through a U(1) gauge field and a rotation-dependent dilaton field with an additional parameter mu_Omega. The authors compute the confinement/deconfinement transition temperature, vector-meson spectral functions, and the spin density matrix element rho_00 for rho, phi, and J/psi in the event plane frame. The central claims are that rotation increases the deconfinement temperature and the meson dissociation temperature, and that rotation enhances rho_00 of the phi (and rho) meson at high transverse momentum, while J/psi remains insensitive up to pT = 5 GeV. The results are compared qualitatively with STAR and ALICE spin-alignment measurements.

Significance. The paper is a serious model-calculation contribution that extends the existing holographic spin-alignment framework of Sheng et al. and Zhao et al. by introducing a gluon-polarization-induced, rotation-dependent dilaton. Its strength is the explicit spectral-function setup and the clear set of predictions (rho_00 vs pT, T, Omega for three mesons) that are, in principle, checkable against future measurements and against the authors' own spectral functions. If the central effect is robust, the paper provides a nonperturbative mechanism, rotation-dependent gluon polarization, that could help interpret the STAR and ALICE patterns. The main weaknesses are that the rotation dependence is injected by an ad hoc dilaton ansatz with a single hand-tuned parameter, and that the in-medium mass shift of the phi resonance is not checked, leaving the high-pT enhancement potentially vulnerable to an evaluation-point artifact. The qualitative comparisons to data are useful but not quantitative.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. II C, Eqs. (45)-(46); Sec. III C, Figs. 9-11] The spin-alignment calculation evaluates rho_00 at the vacuum invariant mass M = m_V (the text after Eq. (46) takes -p^2 = m_V^2), while Eq. (8) makes the IR dilaton slope depend on Omega and thus can shift the in-medium spectral peak M_peak(T, Omega, pT) away from the vacuum mass. Since the common Breit-Wigner factor in Eqs. (45)-(46) cancels in the normalized rho_00, the concern is not the overall rate suppression but that the spin ratio at fixed M = m_V may not represent the physical phi resonance if its peak moves with Omega. The paper never reports M_peak for the phi at the pT values where the rotation enhancement is claimed (roughly pT = 3-5 GeV in Figs. 9-11). I request that the authors plot the spectral peak positions as functions of Omega at these pT values and, if a shift exists, recompute rho_00 using the in-medium peak mass for each Omega; otherwise, they should demonstrate explicitly that the peak location is Omega-independent in the relevant kinematic range.
  2. [Eq. (8); Sec. III A and Sec. III C] All rotational dependence of the spin alignment enters through the ad hoc dilaton ansatz Phi = (mu_G + mu_Omega Omega^2)^2 z^2 tanh(mu_G2^4 z^2 / (mu_G + mu_Omega Omega^2)^2), with mu_Omega = 10 GeV^-1 fixed only by the qualitative requirement that Tc increase with Omega as in lattice QCD. The central prediction, that rotation enhances rho_00 at high pT, is therefore controlled by a parameter that is neither derived nor tested. The authors should add a sensitivity analysis, e.g., varying mu_Omega over the range consistent with the lattice Tc(Omega) constraint, to show that the sign and approximate magnitude of the high-pT enhancement are stable; without this, the robustness of the main new claim is not established.
minor comments (8)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] Several sentences contain grammatical errors; for example, 'the J/psi meson, owing to its heavy charm quark content, demonstrating its resilience' and 'the lowercases refers to the string frame'; these should be corrected.
  2. [Eq. (25), third equation] The first-order derivative coefficient is written with E'_x1 and the G_x2 cross term with E'_x3; by symmetry these should be E'_x3 and E'_x2, respectively.
  3. [Fig. 5 and Fig. 14 captions] Figure conventions are inconsistent: in Fig. 5 the caption states T = 0.168 GeV for the right panel while the legend and text use T = 0.163 GeV, and the legend contains a typo 'T=0.63 GeV'; Fig. 14 caption writes '|Y| >= 0.9' although the text and context indicate '|Y| <= 0.9'.
  4. [Eqs. (13), (15), (17), (28), (29), Appendix A] The dilaton field is denoted Phi in most of the paper but phi in the cited equations and in Appendix A; a single notation should be used throughout.
  5. [Eq. (46)] The definition of the normalization constant is circular (N = sum_lambda rho_lambda_lambda with rho_lambda_lambda already containing N); it should be stated explicitly that N is fixed by Tr rho = 1, which is equivalent to the ratio form used in the numerical results.
  6. [Sec. III C, discussion of Fig. 11] The text says 'for low transverse momentum (p_T >= 3 GeV)' but the intended condition is clearly p_T <= 3 GeV; the inequality is reversed.
  7. [Introduction, first paragraph] The phrase 'a vector field in strong interaction (called the phi field)' is confusing because phi is also used for the dilaton in later equations; consider renaming or clarifying.
  8. [Figure captions throughout] Several captions contain nonstandard phrases such as 'The color online is similar to Fig. 5'; these should be replaced with standard 'color online' notes.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the spin-alignment results are computed from the holographic spectral functions rather than fitted to spin-alignment data.

full rationale

The paper's central prediction, rotation-enhanced rho_00 for phi at high pT, is obtained by solving the vector-meson equations of motion in a fixed rotating background and then forming the ratio of spin-resolved spectral functions in Eq. (46). No parameter appearing in the rho_00 calculation is fitted to STAR or ALICE spin-alignment data. The model parameters are fixed by independent inputs: mu_G, h_s and h_c from vacuum meson masses, and mu_Omega from the lattice QCD trend that Tc increases with Omega. The rotation dependence of the dilaton in Eq. (8) is an explicit model ansatz; computing its consequences for spectral functions and rho_00 is a forward calculation, not a restatement of the input. The self-citations to the DHQCD framework and Nf=4 model are ordinary model-building precedents, not load-bearing uniqueness theorems, and the central claim does not reduce to them. The fixed vacuum mass m_V in the Breit-Wigner factors and the choice of mu_Omega are legitimate robustness concerns but do not make the prediction equivalent to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model uses five numeric parameters, three fitted to zero-temperature meson spectra and one (mu_Omega) tuned to reproduce the lattice Tc(Omega) trend. No new particles or forces are introduced. The rotational response of the spin alignment is therefore shaped by an ad hoc dilaton ansatz rather than by a parameter-free derivation. No code or data are shipped.

free parameters (5)
  • mu_G = 0.43 GeV
    Fitted to higher excited rho meson masses at zero temperature; sets the linear Regge slope and meson mass scale.
  • mu_G2 = 3
    Chosen by hand to be large so it does not affect IR physics, following Ref. [62].
  • mu_Omega = 10 GeV^-1
    Assigned to make the critical temperature versus angular velocity behavior qualitatively match lattice QCD [45]; controls the rotation-dependent dilaton field and hence all rotational effects on spin alignment.
  • h_s = 0.10 GeV
    Fitted to the phi meson mass in the four-flavor soft-wall model.
  • h_c = 0.45 GeV
    Fitted to the J/psi meson mass in the four-flavor soft-wall model.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT correspondence applies to QCD in the bottom-up soft-wall holographic model.
    Section II assumes the 5D EMD action and vector fields dual to meson currents are a valid nonperturbative description of QCD.
  • domain assumption Rotation is modeled by a U(1) gauge field A_theta = Omega r^2 and by the rotation-dependent dilaton field Eq. (8), with the near-center approximation that all background functions depend only on z.
    Section II.A outlines this setup, following Refs. [39,49].
  • ad hoc to paper The dilaton Phi(z) and coupling h(Phi) = e^{-Phi - A_e} are inputs; the potential V is not specified in this paper.
    The EOM system (7) has six unknown functions and is closed by choosing Phi and h by hand, so the thermal and rotational background is not derived from a first-principles potential.
  • domain assumption The four-flavor soft-wall action with heavy scalar H, masses h_s and h_c, gives the vector meson sector.
    Section II.B introduces the action of Refs. [56,57] for rho, phi, and J/psi.
  • standard math Son-Starinets prescription extracts retarded correlators from the on-shell action.
    Eq. (34) and the horizon boundary conditions (27) follow the standard holographic recipe [53].
  • domain assumption The dilepton production rate and spin density matrix are computed using vacuum Breit-Wigner propagators with vacuum mass and width, while the medium enters only through the spectral function.
    Eqs. (37)-(46) adopt this hybrid vacuum-plus-medium description without in-medium mass or width corrections.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gluon polarization contribution to the spin alignment of vector mesons from holography." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2ZU7ILJY

@misc{pith2026250113401,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gluon polarization contribution to the spin alignment of vector mesons from holography},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2ZU7ILJY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.13401}
}
abstract

We investigate the behaviour of vector mesons $\rho$, $\phi$, and $J/\Psi$ in both non-rotating and rotating thermal media using the soft-wall holographic QCD model with four flavours. By incorporating anisotropic backgrounds derived from the Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton action, we incorporate rotational effects via a $U(1)$ gauge field, and the induced polarization of gluons is described by a rotation dependent dilation field. Spectral function analysis reveals that $\rho$ and $\phi$ mesons exhibit broad peaks at lower temperatures, indicating their presence in the medium, while these peaks disappear at higher temperatures. Rotation delays this melting process, increasing the dissociation temperature. In contrast, the $J/\Psi$ meson, owing to its heavy charm quark content, demonstrating its resilience to thermal effects. We further explore the global spin alignment of these mesons in the event plane frame. For the $\phi$ meson, the averaged $\rho_{00}$ over the full range of azimuthal angle shows weak temperature dependence at low transverse momentum ($p_T$) but significant suppression at high $p_T$, aligning with experimental observations. Rotation enhances $\rho_{00}$ at high $p_T$, a phenomenon attributed to angular momentum transfer via spin-orbit coupling. The $J/\Psi$ meson, however, displays insensitivity to temperature and rotation up to $p_T=5$ GeV, with a very small suppression observed at higher $p_T$, likely due to its heavy quark nature. Although $\rho$ meson spin alignment is not yet experimentally measured, it exhibits behaviour qualitatively similar to the $\phi$ meson, with thermal fluctuations dampening alignment and rotation enhancing it.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.13401 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Left: The temperature as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: The free energy density as a function of temperature at different values of the chemical potential, which [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: The temperature as a function of black hole horizon at different values of the angular velocity Ω = 0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (14 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The left panel shows the free energy density as a function of temperature at different values of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: In the left panel, we present the results for the longitudinal spectral function (λ = 0) at zero spatial momentum, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Spectral functions ˜ϱ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Spectral functions ˜ϱ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Left panel: The effect of temperature in a non-rotating background on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Left panel: The effect of rotation in a thermal equilibrium medium at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: Left panel: The effect of temperature in a non-rotating background on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: Left panel: The effect of rotation in a thermal equilibrium medium at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16: Left panel: The effect of temperature in a non-rotating background on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17: Left panel: The effect of rotation in a thermal equilibrium medium at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_17.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Tensor spin polarization induced by curved freeze-out hypersurface

    hep-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The curvature of the freeze-out hypersurface induces a tensor spin polarization of vector mesons at leading gradient order, with predicted phi-meson spin alignment around -10^-4 to -10^-3.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Liang and X.-N

    Z.-T. Liang and X.-N. Wang, Globally polarized quark-gluon plasma in non-central A+A collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 102301 (2005), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 96, 039901 (2006)], arXiv:nucl-th/0410079

    arXiv 2005

  2. [2]

    +e −2B(z) dx2 3 .(20) Within the above background, the equation of motion for the components of the gauge field is given by V ′′ t + − 1 z −ϕ ′ + h′ h +A ′ e V ′ t − 2g2 5e2Ae f hz2 M aa H (z)Vt − e−B f px1 (px1 Vt +ωV x1 ) +p x2 (px2 Vt +ωV x2 ) +e 3Bpx3 (px3 Vt +ωV x3 ) = 0 V ′′ x1 + − 1 z −ϕ ′ + h′ h +A ′ e + f ′ f −B ′ V ′ x1 − 2g2 5e2Ae f hz2 M aa H ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Liang and X.-N

    Z.-T. Liang and X.-N. Wang, Spin alignment of vector mesons in non-central A+A collisions, Phys. Lett. B629, 20 (2005), arXiv:nucl-th/0411101

    arXiv 2005

  4. [4]

    Adamczyk et al

    L. Adamczyk et al. (STAR), Global Λ hyperon polarization in nuclear collisions: evidence for the most vortical fluid, Nature548, 62 (2017), arXiv:1701.06657 [nucl-ex]. 20

    arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    Adam et al

    J. Adam et al. (STAR), Global polarization of Λ hyperons in Au+Au collisions at √sN N= 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. C98, 014910 (2018), arXiv:1805.04400 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2018

  6. [6]

    Adam et al

    J. Adam et al. (STAR), Polarization of Λ ( ¯Λ) hyperons along the beam direction in Au+Au collisions at √sN N = 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 132301 (2019), arXiv:1905.11917 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    M. S. Abdallah et al. (STAR), Pattern of global spin alignment ofϕand K ∗0 mesons in heavy-ion collisions, Nature614, 244 (2023), arXiv:2204.02302 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Acharya et al

    S. Acharya et al. (ALICE), Evidence of Spin-Orbital Angular Momentum Interactions in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 012301 (2020), arXiv:1910.14408 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2020

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    Acharya et al

    S. Acharya et al. (ALICE), First measurement of quarkonium polarization in nuclear collisions at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 815, 136146 (2021), arXiv:2005.11128 [nucl-ex]

    2021 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Acharya et al

    S. Acharya et al. (ALICE), Measurement of the J/ψPolarization with Respect to the Event Plane in Pb-Pb Collisions at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 042303 (2023), arXiv:2204.10171 [nucl-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Wei and M

    M. Wei and M. Huang, Spin alignment of vector mesons from quark dynamics in a rotating medium*, Chin. Phys. C47, 104105 (2023), arXiv:2303.01897 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Sheng, S.-Y

    X.-L. Sheng, S.-Y. Yang, Y.-L. Zou, and D. Hou, Mass splitting and spin alignment forϕmesons in a magnetic field in NJL model, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 299 (2024), arXiv:2209.01872 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Yang, R.-H

    Y.-G. Yang, R.-H. Fang, Q. Wang, and X.-N. Wang, Quark coalescence model for polarized vector mesons and baryons, Phys. Rev. C97, 034917 (2018), arXiv:1711.06008 [nucl-th]

    2018 arXiv

  6. [14]

    X.-L. Xia, H. Li, X.-G. Huang, and H. Zhong Huang, Local spin alignment of vector mesons in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Lett. B817, 136325 (2021), arXiv:2010.01474 [nucl-th]

    2021 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Sheng, L

    X.-L. Sheng, L. Oliva, and Q. Wang, What can we learn from the global spin alignment ofϕmesons in heavy-ion collisions?, Phys. Rev. D101, 096005 (2020), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 105, 099903 (2022)], arXiv:1910.13684 [nucl-th]

    2020 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Sheng, L

    X.-L. Sheng, L. Oliva, Z.-T. Liang, Q. Wang, and X.-N. Wang, Spin Alignment of Vector Mesons in Heavy-Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 042304 (2023), arXiv:2205.15689 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Sheng, S

    X.-L. Sheng, S. Pu, and Q. Wang, Momentum dependence of the spin alignment of theϕmeson, Phys. Rev. C108, 054902 (2023), arXiv:2308.14038 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  10. [18]

    S. Fang, S. Pu, and D.-L. Yang, Spin polarization and spin alignment from quantum kinetic theory with self-energy corrections, Phys. Rev. D109, 034034 (2024), arXiv:2311.15197 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    M¨ uller and D.-L

    B. M¨ uller and D.-L. Yang, Anomalous spin polarization from turbulent color fields, Phys. Rev. D105, L011901 (2022), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 106, 039904 (2022)], arXiv:2110.15630 [nucl-th]

    2022 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Gao, Helicity polarization in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys

    J.-H. Gao, Helicity polarization in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. D104, 076016 (2021), arXiv:2105.08293 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Kumar, B

    A. Kumar, B. M¨ uller, and D.-L. Yang, Spin alignment of vector mesons by glasma fields, Phys. Rev. D108, 016020 (2023), arXiv:2304.04181 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  14. [22]

    B. Fu, F. Gao, Y.-X. Liu, and H. Song, The spin alignment of vector mesons with light front quarks, Phys. Lett. B855, 138821 (2024), arXiv:2308.07936 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Xu and M

    K. Xu and M. Huang, Spin alignment of vector mesons induced by local spin density fluctuations, Phys. Rev. D110, 094034 (2024), arXiv:2408.06581 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Lv, Z.-h

    J.-p. Lv, Z.-h. Yu, Z.-t. Liang, Q. Wang, and X.-N. Wang, Global quark spin correlations in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. D109, 114003 (2024), arXiv:2402.13721 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    H.-L. Chen, K. Fukushima, X.-G. Huang, and K. Mameda, Analogy between rotation and density for Dirac fermions in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D93, 104052 (2016), arXiv:1512.08974 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Jiang and J

    Y. Jiang and J. Liao, Pairing Phase Transitions of Matter under Rotation, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 192302 (2016), arXiv:1606.03808 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Ebihara, K

    S. Ebihara, K. Fukushima, and K. Mameda, Boundary effects and gapped dispersion in rotating fermionic matter, Phys. Lett. B764, 94 (2017), arXiv:1608.00336 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  20. [28]

    M. N. Chernodub and S. Gongyo, Interacting fermions in rotation: chiral symmetry restoration, moment of inertia and thermodynamics, JHEP01, 136, arXiv:1611.02598 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    M. N. Chernodub and S. Gongyo, Effects of rotation and boundaries on chiral symmetry breaking of relativistic fermions, Phys. Rev. D95, 096006 (2017), arXiv:1702.08266 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  22. [30]

    X. Wang, M. Wei, Z. Li, and M. Huang, Quark matter under rotation in the NJL model with vector interaction, Phys. Rev. D99, 016018 (2019), arXiv:1808.01931 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Sun and A

    F. Sun and A. Huang, Properties of strange quark matter under strong rotation, Phys. Rev. D106, 076007 (2022), arXiv:2104.14382 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  24. [32]

    K. Xu, F. Lin, A. Huang, and M. Huang, Λ/Λ¯polarization and splitting induced by rotation and magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D106, L071502 (2022), arXiv:2205.02420 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  25. [33]

    F. Sun, K. Xu, and M. Huang, Splitting of chiral and deconfinement phase transitions induced by rotation, Phys. Rev. D 108, 096007 (2023), arXiv:2307.14402 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    X. Chen, L. Zhang, D. Li, D. Hou, and M. Huang, Gluodynamics and deconfinement phase transition under rotation from holography, JHEP07, 132, arXiv:2010.14478 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  27. [35]

    N. R. F. Braga and O. C. Junqueira, Inhomogeneity of a rotating quark-gluon plasma from holography, Phys. Lett. B848, 138330 (2024), arXiv:2306.08653 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Z. Li, J. Liang, S. He, and L. Li, Holographic study of higher-order baryon number susceptibilities at finite temperature and density, Phys. Rev. D108, 046008 (2023), arXiv:2305.13874 [hep-ph]. 21

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    V. E. Ambru¸ s and M. N. Chernodub, Rigidly rotating scalar fields: Between real divergence and imaginary fractalization, Phys. Rev. D108, 085016 (2023), arXiv:2304.05998 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Y.-Q. Zhao, S. He, D. Hou, L. Li, and Z. Li, Phase diagram of holographic thermal dense QCD matter with rotation, JHEP04, 115, arXiv:2212.14662 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    A. A. Golubtsova and N. S. Tsegelnik, Probing the holographic model of N=4 SYM rotating quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. D107, 106017 (2023), arXiv:2211.11722 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Y. Chen, D. Li, and M. Huang, Inhomogeneous chiral condensation under rotation in the holographic QCD, Phys. Rev. D 106, 106002 (2022), arXiv:2208.05668 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  33. [41]

    S. Chen, K. Fukushima, and Y. Shimada, Perturbative Confinement in Thermal Yang-Mills Theories Induced by Imaginary Angular Velocity, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 242002 (2022), arXiv:2207.12665 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Yadav, Deconfinement temperature of rotating QGP at intermediate coupling from M-theory, Phys

    G. Yadav, Deconfinement temperature of rotating QGP at intermediate coupling from M-theory, Phys. Lett. B841, 137925 (2023), arXiv:2203.11959 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  35. [43]

    N. R. F. Braga, L. F. Faulhaber, and O. C. Junqueira, Confinement-deconfinement temperature for a rotating quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. D105, 106003 (2022), arXiv:2201.05581 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Cartwright, M

    C. Cartwright, M. G. Amano, M. Kaminski, J. Noronha, and E. Speranza, Convergence of hydrodynamics in a rotating strongly coupled plasma, Phys. Rev. D108, 046014 (2023), arXiv:2112.10781 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  37. [45]

    A. A. Golubtsova, E. Gourgoulhon, and M. K. Usova, Heavy quarks in rotating plasma via holography, Nucl. Phys. B979, 115786 (2022), arXiv:2107.11672 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  38. [46]

    V. V. Braguta, A. Y. Kotov, D. D. Kuznedelev, and A. A. Roenko, Influence of relativistic rotation on the confinement- deconfinement transition in gluodynamics, Phys. Rev. D103, 094515 (2021), arXiv:2102.05084 [hep-lat]

    2021 arXiv

  39. [47]

    V. V. Braguta, A. Kotov, A. Roenko, and D. Sychev, Thermal phase transitions in rotating QCD with dynamical quarks, PoSLA TTICE2022, 190 (2023), arXiv:2212.03224 [hep-lat]

    2023 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Yang and X.-G

    J.-C. Yang and X.-G. Huang, QCD on Rotating Lattice with Staggered Fermions (2023) arXiv:2307.05755 [hep-lat]

    2023 arXiv

  41. [49]

    F. Sun, J. Shao, R. Wen, K. Xu, and M. Huang, Chiral phase transition and spin alignment of vector mesons in the polarized-Polyakov-loop Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model under rotation, Phys. Rev. D109, 116017 (2024), arXiv:2402.16595 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Y. Chen, X. Chen, D. Li, and M. Huang, Deconfinement and chiral restoration phase transition under rotation from holography in an anisotropic gravitational background (2024) arXiv:2405.06386 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    J. M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 231 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9711200

    1998 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography, Adv

    E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 253 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9802150

    1998 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Karch, E

    A. Karch, E. Katz, D. T. Son, and M. A. Stephanov, Linear confinement and AdS/QCD, Phys. Rev. D74, 015005 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0602229

    2006 arXiv

  46. [54]

    D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets, Minkowski space correlators in AdS / CFT correspondence: Recipe and applications, JHEP 09, 042, arXiv:hep-th/0205051

    arXiv

  47. [55]

    Sheng, Y.-Q

    X.-L. Sheng, Y.-Q. Zhao, S.-W. Li, F. Becattini, and D. Hou, Holographic spin alignment for vector mesons, Phys. Rev. D110, 056047 (2024), arXiv:2403.07522 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Zhao, X.-L

    Y.-Q. Zhao, X.-L. Sheng, S.-W. Li, and D. Hou, Holographic spin alignment of J/ψmeson in magnetized plasma, JHEP 08, 070, arXiv:2403.07468 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  49. [57]

    Chen and M

    Y. Chen and M. Huang, Holographic QCD model for Nf=4, Phys. Rev. D105, 026021 (2022), arXiv:2110.08215 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  50. [58]

    H. A. Ahmed, Y. Chen, and M. Huang, Electromagnetic form factors in the Nf=4 holographic QCD, Phys. Rev. D108, 086034 (2023), arXiv:2308.14975 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  51. [59]

    M. Wei, Y. Jiang, and M. Huang, Mass splitting of vector mesons and spontaneous spin polarization under rotation *, Chin. Phys. C46, 024102 (2022), arXiv:2011.10987 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Chen and M

    X. Chen and M. Huang, Machine learning holographic black hole from lattice QCD equation of state, Phys. Rev. D109, L051902 (2024), arXiv:2401.06417 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Erlich, E

    J. Erlich, E. Katz, D. T. Son, and M. A. Stephanov, QCD and a holographic model of hadrons, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 261602 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0501128

    2005 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Faccioli, C

    P. Faccioli, C. Lourenco, J. Seixas, and H. K. Wohri, Towards the experimental clarification of quarkonium polarization, Eur. Phys. J. C69, 657 (2010), arXiv:1006.2738 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  55. [63]

    D. Li, J. Liao, and M. Huang, Enhancement of jet quenching around phase transition: result from the dynamical holographic model, Phys. Rev. D89, 126006 (2014), arXiv:1401.2035 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Andronic, P

    A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich, and J. Stachel, Decoding the phase structure of QCD via particle production at high energy, Nature561, 321 (2018), arXiv:1710.09425 [nucl-th]

    2018 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.