REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 52 references
Nonreciprocal interactions induce frequency shifts in superradiant lasers
T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read Partially driving a superradiant laser does not just lower its power: the undriven atoms repel the driven atoms' phase, driving the collective spin into traveling-wave states that shift the laser frequency by ±ω and broaden its line.
desk verdict Clean mean-field frequency shift from undriven atoms, but the persistent steady-state shift rests on an unbenchmarked cumulant residual; line broadening is the firmer practical effect. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The load-bearing object is the traveling-wave ansatz for the mean-field equations: $s_d^+ = |s_d^+| e^{i\omega t + i(\phi_d - \phi_{\rm ud})}$, $s_{\rm ud}^+ = |s_{\rm ud}^+| e^{i\omega t}$, with constant populations $s^z_d$ and $s^z_{\rm ud}$. With the average coherence $s^+ = p_d s_d^+ + p_{\rm ud} s_{\rm ud}^+$, the phase dynamics reduce to Eq. (4), $\dot\phi_\mu = s^z_\mu \, V |s^+|/|s_\mu^+| \sin(\bar\phi - \phi_\mu)$. The sign of $s^z_\mu$ decides whether species $\mu$ aligns ($s^z_d > 0$) or antialigns ($s^z_{\rm ud} < 0$) with the average phase; this competing alignment and antialignment is the nonreciprocal interaction. The traveling-wave ansatz turns Eqs. (3) into algebraic equations whose solution is Eq. (5), and the same frequency appears as the dashed curve matching the numerically computed spectrum.
What would settle it
Take a superradiant laser operated deep in the bad-cavity regime with a large atom number, pump fraction $p_d = 0.8$, and $\gamma_+ \approx V$. If the claim is correct, the steady-state emission spectrum should show two resolved peaks at $\pm\omega$ given by Eq. (5), not a single line at the atomic frequency, and the splitting should vanish as $p_d \to 1$ and as $p_d$ approaches the lasing threshold. Sweeping the undriven fraction and comparing the measured peak separation to Eq. (5) settles it: a single line at all $p_d$, or a shift that tracks cavity detuning instead of $p_d$, would falsify the traveling-wave mechanism.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The central discovery is that a mixture of driven and undriven atoms in the bad-cavity limit has no static synchronized steady state for $p_d < 1$. In the mean-field equations, driven spins ($s^z_d > 0$) align their phases with the average coherence, while undriven spins ($s^z_{\rm ud} < 0$) antialign. This conformist-contrarian competition produces traveling-wave states: populations stay constant and coherences rotate at frequency $\omega = \pm \sqrt{\frac{\gamma_+}{4}\left[v - 2V\,p_{\rm ud} - \sqrt{v(v-4V\,p_{\rm ud})}\right]}$, with $v = 2V - \gamma_+$. Inserting this ansatz solves the mean-field equations exactly and gives Eq. (5). Since the cavity field follows the collective spin, $a = -i(2\Omega/\kappa) S^-$, the rotating spins shift the output frequency and the antialignment reduces coherence, broadening the line. The shift is unique to the superradiant bad-cavity regime: in a standard good-cavity laser, undriven atoms only reduce the effective gain and cause no frequency shift. A stability analysis also raises the lasing threshold to $p_d > 1/2 + \gamma_+/(4V)$, so at least half the atoms must be driven.
Load-bearing premise
The sharp formula (5) assumes the cavity is lossy enough that it can be eliminated adiabatically and that the atoms are numerous enough to be treated as independent spins in an average field; when those assumptions weaken, Eq. (5) is only approximate and the residual finite-size shift is not tightly controlled.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- For any $p_d < 1$ above the lasing threshold, the steady-state emission is symmetrically displaced to two frequencies $\pm\omega$ rather than one line at the atomic transition; noise causes rare switching between the two, with a rate exponentially suppressed in the number of atoms.
- The linewidth grows as $p_d$ decreases: at $\gamma_+ = V/2$, only 3% undriven atoms increase the linewidth by about an order of magnitude, and power is also reduced.
- The lasing threshold moves to $p_d > 1/2 + \gamma_+/(4V)$; if the undriven atoms were decoupled from the cavity, lasing would be possible for any $p_d$ once $V$ is large enough, so the coupled undriven atoms are genuinely destabilizing.
- With spontaneous emission and dephasing, the frequency shift in the thermodynamic limit decays exponentially at rate $\Gamma = \gamma_- + 2\gamma_z$; for finite $N$ a residual shift remains in the spectrum and vanishes as $N \to \infty$.
- Because the same master equation describes superradiant masers and atomic-beam superradiant lasers, the effect should also appear there whenever a fraction of emitters is left undriven or unexcited.
Reading between the lines
- Editorial inference: if the phase-repulsion mechanism is generic, the same pump-mixture instability should be visible in other bad-cavity collective emitters, such as superradiant masers or polariton systems, and the size of the shift could serve as a non-destructive probe of whether the undriven population is actually non-inverted.
- Editorial inference: the bistable $\pm\omega$ output turns the device into a spontaneously symmetry-broken frequency source; a small detuning already biases the two traveling states unequally, suggesting a controllable switch between two emission frequencies.
- Editorial inference: Eq. (5) has a distinctive functional form: near $p_{\rm ud}=0$ the shift vanishes linearly in $p_{\rm ud}$, and near threshold it opens as a square root; measuring the splitting while sweeping $p_{\rm ud}$ or $\gamma_+$ would cleanly separate this nonreciprocal shift from a detuning shift, which is linear in the detuning.
- Editorial inference: the finite-$N$ residual shift seen in the cumulant calculation is a prediction of that truncation, not of the exact dynamics; exact diagonalization or quantum trajectory simulations at moderate $N$ would tell whether quantum fluctuations genuinely stabilize a nonzero shift where the mean field predicts none.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper studies the superradiant-laser model of Meiser et al. when only a fraction pd of the spins are incoherently driven. After adiabatic elimination of the bad cavity and a mean-field treatment of the spins (Eq. (3)), the authors derive a traveling-wave ansatz whose frequency is given by Eq. (5), showing that undriven atoms cause a frequency shift and spectral broadening. The phase dynamics are interpreted through conformist-contrarian oscillator dynamics and identified as nonreciprocal interactions (Eq. (4)). When spontaneous emission and dephasing are included, the mean-field traveling-wave frequency decays to zero, but a finite-size residual frequency shift remains in the cumulant approximation and forms the basis of the steady-state frequency-shift regime in Fig. 3(a). The paper concludes that undriven atoms limit the performance of a superradiant laser as a frequency reference.
Significance. The mean-field core of the paper is clean and valuable: Eq. (5) is a parameter-free analytic solution of the mean-field equations, Eq. (6) follows from a standard stability analysis, and the dashed mean-field line in Fig. 2(a) agrees with the independently computed cumulant spectrum. The connection between superradiant lasers and conformist-contrarian oscillator dynamics is conceptually interesting and may be of broader relevance in driven-dissipative quantum systems. The authors use the QuantumCumulants.jl package, which is a reproducibility strength. However, the practical steady-state claim depends on a finite-N residual frequency shift whose accuracy is not established; establishing that residual with an independent method would make this an important result for superradiant-laser metrology.
major comments (3)
- [Spontaneous emission and dephasing; Fig. 3(b); Fig. S2] The central practical claim of the paper is that a frequency shift persists in the steady state of a realistic superradiant laser with undriven atoms. The mean-field solution, however, decays exponentially to zero, and the persistent shift is a finite-N effect computed entirely within the third-order cumulant truncation. No independent verification (e.g., a fourth-order cumulant expansion, exact diagonalization for small N, or quantum trajectory simulations) and no error estimate are provided. Since the effect vanishes in the thermodynamic limit, the residual could be a truncation artifact, and it should be validated quantitatively before the steady-state limitation claim is accepted.
- [Eq. (5)] The derivation of Eq. (5), the headline quantitative prediction, is not shown in the main text or in the supplied supplemental material; the text only states that the traveling-wave ansatz is inserted into Eqs. (3). Because this formula is compared to the spectra in Fig. 2(a) and used to define the frequency shift, the authors should provide the algebraic derivation and the existence/stability conditions for the traveling-wave solutions in the supplement.
- [Fig. 3(d,e); Lorentzian fits in the Supplemental Material] The steady-state linewidth and frequency shift in Figs. 3(d,e) are extracted by fitting a double Lorentzian to spectra computed in the same cumulant approximation, but no fit residuals, parameter uncertainties, or comparison of the fitted shifts with the raw spectral peak positions are shown. Given that the shifts in Fig. 3(e) are small and define the hatched region in Fig. 3(a), this information is necessary to assess whether the reported steady-state frequency shift is significant rather than a fitting artifact.
minor comments (4)
- [Spontaneous emission and dephasing; Fig. 3(b)] The main text states that the mean-field frequency shift decays to zero at rate Γ, while the caption of Fig. 3(b) states that the dashed line decays at rate Γ/2 = (γ− + 2γz)/2; please reconcile these statements and define which quantity decays at which rate.
- [Eqs. (2) and (5)] The symbol ω is used both for the spectral frequency variable in Eq. (2) and for the traveling-wave frequency in Eq. (5); using a distinct symbol for the traveling-wave frequency would avoid confusion.
- [Eq. (4)] The statement that the sign of sz_μ determines whether the phase aligns or antialigns is slightly imprecise, because the sine factor in Eq. (4) also changes sign; the alignment condition should be stated in terms of the relative phase as well.
- [Figs. 3(d,e) and Fig. S2] The notation 'N = 10 5' and 'N = 105' should be typeset consistently as 10^5, and the legend reference in Figs. 3(d,e) to 'same legend as (c)' should be replaced by an explicit legend.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: Eq. (5) is a parameter-free solution of the mean-field equations, and the sole self-citation is not load-bearing.
full rationale
The derivation of the central frequency formula is self-contained: Eq. (5) is obtained by inserting an explicit traveling-wave ansatz into the mean-field equations (3), which are themselves derived from the Lindblad master equation (1) by adiabatically eliminating the cavity in the bad-cavity limit (a = -i(2Omega/kappa)S-) and taking the thermodynamic limit. No constant is fitted to the spectrum; the dashed line in Fig. 2(a) is a parameter-free comparison with the cumulant spectrum. The lasing threshold Eq. (6) comes from a stability analysis of the incoherent fixed point, and the linewidth broadening in Fig. 3(d) is a computed consequence of the same model. The only self-citation, Ref. [28] (Nadolny, Bruder, and Brunelli, PRX 15, 011010 (2025)), appears in the side remark 'the switching rate, however, is in general exponentially suppressed in the number of spins and becomes irrelevant for a large number of spins [12, 28]' and in a Supplement remark about parity-time symmetry when detuning is nonzero; neither is used as an input to derive Eq. (5) or Eq. (6), and the switching statement is also supported by the external Ref. [12]. The finite-N steady-state frequency shift in Fig. 3(b) and Fig. S2 is computed with a stated cumulant truncation whose residual accuracy is not independently benchmarked; this is an approximation-robustness issue, not a circular step, because no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.
Assumptions & free parameters
assumptions (6)
- domain assumption The open system is described by the Lindblad master equation Eq. (1) with a single cavity mode, equal spin-cavity coupling Omega, cavity decay kappa, and incoherent pumping gamma+ on driven spins.
- domain assumption The cavity can be adiabatically eliminated in the bad-cavity limit, giving a = -i(2 Omega / kappa) S-.
- domain assumption Permutational invariance plus the thermodynamic limit N to infinity with V = 2 N Omega^2 / kappa fixed make the mean-field factorization exact.
- domain assumption For finite N, third and higher-order correlations are neglected in the cumulant expansion used for spectra and power.
- standard math The quantum regression theorem and the Laplace transform give the steady-state spectrum from the linearized two-time correlation matrix M.
- standard math The stability of the incoherent fixed point determines the lasing transition.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Nonreciprocal interactions induce frequency shifts in superradiant lasers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/S7ZPRHVJ
@misc{pith2026250113808,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Nonreciprocal interactions induce frequency shifts in superradiant lasers},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/S7ZPRHVJ}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.13808}
}
read the original abstract
Superradiant lasers, which consist of incoherently driven atoms coupled to a lossy cavity, are a promising source of coherent light due to their stable frequency and superior narrow linewidth. We show that when a fraction of the atoms is not driven, a shift in the lasing frequency and a broadening of the linewidth occur, limiting the performance of a superradiant laser. We explain this behavior by identifying nonreciprocal interactions between driven and undriven atoms, i.e., competing alignment and antialignment of their dipoles. Our results have implications for the realization of superradiant lasers, establishing the relevance of nonreciprocal phenomena for quantum technologies.
Figures
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[28]
Nadolny, C
T. Nadolny, C. Bruder, and M. Brunelli, Nonreciprocal synchronization of active quantum spins, Phys. Rev. X 15, 011010 (2025)
2025
-
[1]
Haake, M
F. Haake, M. I. Kolobov, C. Fabre, E. Giacobino, and S. Reynaud, Superradiant laser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 995 (1993)
1993
-
[2]
Chen, Active optical clock, Chin
J. Chen, Active optical clock, Chin. Sci. Bull. 54, 348 (2009)
work page 2009
- [3]
-
[4]
J. G. Bohnet, Z. Chen, J. M. Weiner, D. Meiser, M. J. Holland, and J. K. Thompson, A steady-state superradi- ant laser with less than one intracavity photon, Nature 484, 78 (2012)
2012
-
[5]
M. A. Norcia and J. K. Thompson, Cold-Strontium Laser in the Superradiant Crossover Regime, Phys. Rev. X 6, 011025 (2016)
2016
- [6]
-
[7]
S. L. Kristensen, E. Bohr, J. Robinson-Tait, T. Zelevin- sky, J. W. Thomsen, and J. H. M¨ uller, Subnatural Linewidth Superradiant Lasing with Cold 88Sr Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 223402 (2023)
work page 2023
Show all 52 references
-
[8]
A. D. Ludlow, M. M. Boyd, J. Ye, E. Peik, and P. O. Schmidt, Optical atomic clocks, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 637 (2015)
2015
-
[9]
M. J. Bowick, N. Fakhri, M. C. Marchetti, and S. Ra- maswamy, Symmetry, thermodynamics, and topology in active matter, Phys. Rev. X 12, 010501 (2022)
2022
-
[10]
Shankar, A
S. Shankar, A. Souslov, M. J. Bowick, M. C. Marchetti, and V. Vitelli, Topological active matter, Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 380 (2022)
2022
-
[11]
Z. You, A. Baskaran, and M. C. Marchetti, Nonreciproc- ity as a generic route to traveling states, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 19767 (2020)
2020
-
[12]
Fruchart, R
M. Fruchart, R. Hanai, P. B. Littlewood, and V. Vitelli, Non-reciprocal phase transitions, Nature 592, 363 (2021)
2021
-
[13]
Brauns and M
F. Brauns and M. C. Marchetti, Nonreciprocal Pattern Formation of Conserved Fields, Phys. Rev. X 14, 021014 (2024)
2024
-
[14]
Hanai, Nonreciprocal frustration: Time crystalline order-by-disorder phenomenon and a spin-glass-like state, Phys
R. Hanai, Nonreciprocal frustration: Time crystalline order-by-disorder phenomenon and a spin-glass-like state, Phys. Rev. X 14, 011029 (2024)
2024
-
[15]
Hong and S
H. Hong and S. H. Strogatz, Kuramoto Model of Coupled Oscillators with Positive and Negative Coupling Param- eters: An Example of Conformist and Contrarian Oscil- lators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 054102 (2011)
2011
-
[16]
Hong and S
H. Hong and S. H. Strogatz, Conformists and contrarians in a Kuramoto model with identical natural frequencies, Phys. Rev. E 84, 046202 (2011)
2011
-
[17]
Hanai, A
R. Hanai, A. Edelman, Y. Ohashi, and P. B. Littlewood, Non-Hermitian Phase Transition from a Polariton Bose- Einstein Condensate to a Photon Laser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 185301 (2019)
2019
-
[18]
Hanai and P
R. Hanai and P. B. Littlewood, Critical fluctuations at a many-body exceptional point, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033018 (2020)
2020
-
[19]
L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, J. Marino, and S. Diehl, Universality in driven open quantum matter (2023), arXiv:2312.03073
2023 arXiv
-
[20]
C. P. Zelle, R. Daviet, A. Rosch, and S. Diehl, Uni- versal Phenomenology at Critical Exceptional Points of Nonequilibrium O(N ) Models, Phys. Rev. X 14, 021052 (2024)
2024
-
[21]
C. W. Gardiner, Driving a quantum system with the output field from another driven quantum system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2269 (1993)
1993
-
[22]
H. J. Carmichael, Quantum trajectory theory for cas- caded open systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2273 (1993)
1993
-
[23]
Metelmann and A
A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, Nonreciprocal photon transmission and amplification via reservoir engineering, Phys. Rev. X 5, 021025 (2015)
2015
-
[24]
E. I. R. Chiacchio, A. Nunnenkamp, and M. Brunelli, Nonreciprocal Dicke model, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 113602 (2023)
2023
-
[25]
Reisenbauer, H
M. Reisenbauer, H. Rudolph, L. Egyed, K. Hornberger, A. V. Zasedatelev, M. Abuzarli, B. A. Stickler, and U. Deli´ c, Non-Hermitian dynamics and non-reciprocity of optically coupled nanoparticles, Nat. Phys. 20, 1629 (2024)
2024
-
[26]
Rudolph, U
H. Rudolph, U. Deli´ c, K. Hornberger, and B. A. Stickler, Quantum Optical Binding of Nanoscale Particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 233603 (2024)
2024
-
[27]
Hanai, D
R. Hanai, D. Ootsuki, and R. Tazai, Photoinduced non- reciprocal magnetism (2024), arXiv:2406.05957
2024
-
[29]
[45], for details on cumulant expansion, spectrum calculation, spin-cavity detuning, comparison to standard lasers, sta- bility analysis, and Lorentzian fits
See Supplemental Material, which includes Ref. [45], for details on cumulant expansion, spectrum calculation, spin-cavity detuning, comparison to standard lasers, sta- bility analysis, and Lorentzian fits
-
[30]
Kubo, Generalized cumulant expansion method, Jour- nal of the Physical Society of Japan 17, 1100 (1962)
R. Kubo, Generalized cumulant expansion method, Jour- nal of the Physical Society of Japan 17, 1100 (1962)
1962
-
[31]
Breuer and F
H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press, 2007)
2007
-
[32]
M. Xu, D. A. Tieri, E. C. Fine, J. K. Thompson, and M. J. Holland, Synchronization of two ensembles of atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 154101 (2014)
2014
-
[33]
Plankensteiner, C
D. Plankensteiner, C. Hotter, and H. Ritsch, Quantum- Cumulants.jl: A Julia framework for generalized mean- field equations in open quantum systems, Quantum 6, 617 (2022)
2022
-
[34]
Spohn, Kinetic equations from Hamiltonian dynamics: Markovian limits, Rev
H. Spohn, Kinetic equations from Hamiltonian dynamics: Markovian limits, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 569 (1980)
1980
-
[35]
The thermodynamic limit N → ∞is well defined, when simultaneously decreasing Ω → 0, such that V ∝ N Ω2 = constant
-
[36]
B. Zhu, J. Schachenmayer, M. Xu, F. Herrera, J. G. Re- strepo, M. J. Holland, and A. M. Rey, Synchronization of interacting quantum dipoles, New Journal of Physics 17, 083063 (2015)
2015
-
[37]
Sacha and J
K. Sacha and J. Zakrzewski, Time crystals: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 016401 (2017). 6
2017
-
[38]
Kongkhambut, J
P. Kongkhambut, J. Skulte, L. Mathey, J. G. Cosme, A. Hemmerich, and H. Keßler, Observation of a continu- ous time crystal, Science 377, 670 (2022)
2022
-
[39]
G. A. Kazakov and T. Schumm, Active optical frequency standards using cold atoms: Perspectives and challenges, in 2014 European Frequency and Time Forum (EFTF) (2014) pp. 411–414
2014
-
[40]
H. Liu, S. B. J¨ ager, X. Yu, S. Touzard, A. Shankar, M. J. Holland, and T. L. Nicholson, Rugged mHz-Linewidth Superradiant Laser Driven by a Hot Atomic Beam, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 253602 (2020)
2020
-
[41]
M. Tang, S. A. Sch¨ affer, and J. H. M¨ uller, Prospects of a superradiant laser based on a thermal or guided beam of 88Sr, Phys. Rev. A 106, 063704 (2022)
2022
-
[42]
Fam` a, S
F. Fam` a, S. Zhou, B. Heizenreder, M. Tang, S. Bennetts, S. B. J¨ ager, S. A. Sch¨ affer, and F. Schreck, Continuous cavity QED with an atomic beam, Phys. Rev. A 110, 063721 (2024)
2024
-
[43]
D. M. Arroo, N. M. Alford, and J. D. Breeze, Perspec- tive on room-temperature solid-state masers, Appl. Phys. Lett. 119, 140502 (2021)
2021
-
[44]
Q. Wu, Y. Zhang, X. Yang, S.-L. Su, C. Shan, and K. Mølmer, A superradiant maser with nitrogen-vacancy center spins, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.65, 1 (2022)
2022
-
[45]
Nonreciprocal interactions induce frequency shifts in superradiant lasers
M. A. Norcia, R. J. Lewis-Swan, J. R. K. Cline, B. Zhu, A. M. Rey, and J. K. Thompson, Cavity-mediated col- lective spin-exchange interactions in a strontium super- radiant laser, Science 361, 259 (2018). 1 Supplemental material for “Nonreciprocal interactions induce frequency...
2018
-
[46]
Additionally, we exploit the permutational invariance of driven and undriven spins respectively, and the global U (1)-symmetry to set terms like ⟨a⟩ or a†σ+ µ equal to zero
Cumulant expansion To calculate the output power and the spectrum for large but finite N , we use a cumulant expansion [30] neglecting third and higher-order correlations. Additionally, we exploit the permutational invariance of driven and undriven spins respectively, and the ...
-
[47]
Spectrum The spectrum is computed within the cumulant expansion approximation using the quantum regression theorem [31]. By factorizing σz µ(t + τ )a†(t + τ )a(t) ≈ sz µ(t + τ ) a†(t + τ )a(t) , the two-time correlations evolve according to d dτ c(t, τ) = M (t+τ )c(t, τ) , c(t...
-
[48]
The master equation in the laboratory frame is ˙ρ = −i[H, ρ] + κD[a]ρ + γ+ NdX i=1 D[σ+ d,i]ρ , H = ωs 2 Sz + ωca†a + Ω(a†S− + aS+)
Influence of cavity-spin detuning We discuss the effect of a nonzero detuning between cavity frequencyωc and spin frequency ωs. The master equation in the laboratory frame is ˙ρ = −i[H, ρ] + κD[a]ρ + γ+ NdX i=1 D[σ+ d,i]ρ , H = ωs 2 Sz + ωca†a + Ω(a†S− + aS+) . (S4) The collec...
-
[49]
Comparison to standard laser The mean-field equations of the master equation Eq. (1) in the presence of the cavity field α = ⟨a⟩ are d dt sz d = −γ−(sz d + 1) − γ+(sz d − 1) + 4Ω Im[αs+ d ] , d dt sz ud = −γ−(sz ud + 1) + 4Ω Im[αs+ ud] , d dt s+ d = −(γ+ + γ− + 2γz)s+ d /2 − i...
-
[50]
The fixed point, which characterizes the incoherent state, is s+ d,ud = 0, sz d = (γ+ − γ)/(γ+ + γ), and sz ud = −1
Mean-field stability analysis The mean-field equations including decay at rate γ− and dephasing at rate Γ = γ− + 2γz are d dt s+ d = V s+sz d − (Γ + γ+) s+ d /2 , d dt s+ ud = V s+sz ud − Γs+ ud/2 , d dt sz d = −4V Re[s− d s+] − γ−(1 + sz d) + γ+(1 − sz d) , d dt sz ud = −4V R...
-
[51]
3(d,e), we fit the sum of two Lorentzian distributions, A π ∆ν ∆ν2 + (ω − δ)2 + ∆ν ∆ν2 + (ω + δ)2 , (S12) with amplitude A and linewidth ∆ν, displaced by ±δ, to the spectrum
Lorentzian fits To obtain the linewidth and the frequency shift in Figs. 3(d,e), we fit the sum of two Lorentzian distributions, A π ∆ν ∆ν2 + (ω − δ)2 + ∆ν ∆ν2 + (ω + δ)2 , (S12) with amplitude A and linewidth ∆ν, displaced by ±δ, to the spectrum. The fitted linewidth and freq...
-
[52]
For N → ∞, the spectrum approaches the mean-field prediction (dashed line)
Dependence of frequency shift on system size Figure S2 shows the time evolution of the frequency shift for different values of N . For N → ∞, the spectrum approaches the mean-field prediction (dashed line). The cumulant expansion thus predicts that the frequency shift vanishes...
Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.