Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 66 references

Emergence of $X$ states in a quantum impurity model

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single delta-kick at an edge impurity prepares an entangled two-qubit X-state in a quantum spin chain.

desk verdict The X-state form is exact, but the SM's explicit density-matrix entries look wrong, so the concurrence/discord plots aren't reliable yet. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.13914 v3 pith:QO6V737X submitted 2025-01-23 cond-mat.str-el quant-ph

Moallison F. Cavalcante , Marcus V. S. Bonança , Eduardo Miranda , Sebastian Deffner This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elquant-ph
keywords X-statesquantumimpuritymodeledgemodescorrelationsconcurrencediscordout-of-time-ordercorrelatortransverse-fieldIsingchain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper shows that in a transverse-field Ising chain with an impurity at its boundary, a single sharp kick at the impurity makes the two localized edge modes relax into an $X$-state—a two-qubit density matrix with only diagonal and anti-diagonal coherences—in the long-time limit. The result matters because it demonstrates that a simple local control on a many-body system can prepare an entangled two-qubit state that survives after the bulk has equilibrated, stored in the edge modes. The paper also shows that the appearance of the $X$-state is heralded by the non-decay of the response function and the out-of-time-order correlator, which signal that excitations are trapped in the edge modes. Finally, the authors characterize the state with purity, concurrence, and discord, finding genuine quantum correlations that survive in the long-time limit.

What carries the argument

The central object is the reduced density matrix $\rho_{\mathrm{loc}}(t)$ of the two localized edge modes $\gamma_1$ and $\gamma_2$, obtained by tracing out all delocalized bulk modes from the post-kick state. After the fast bulk coherences have dephased (phases $e^{-i(\Gamma_k+\Gamma_{k'}-\Gamma_{k''})t}$ average to zero for $t\gg J^{-1}$), $\rho_{\mathrm{loc}}(t)$ takes the $X$ form: a $4\times 4$ matrix on the occupation basis $\{|0,0\rangle, |0,1\rangle, |1,0\rangle, |1,1\rangle\}$ with only diagonal entries $\rho_{11}, \rho_{22}, \rho_{33}, \rho_{44}$ and anti-diagonal coherences $\rho_{14}(t), \rho_{23}(t)$ (and their conjugates). This $X$ form makes concurrence and discord analytically tractable. The mechanism that selects the $X$ structure is the dephasing of coherences between Fock states with different bulk-mode occupations; the persistent oscillations of the response function and the OTOC herald the trapped excitations that produce the state.

What would settle it

Numerically integrate the exact time evolution of a finite but long chain after the delta-kick, keeping all coherences, and check whether the off-$X$ matrix elements of $\rho_{\mathrm{loc}}(t)$—for example $\langle 0,0| \rho_{\mathrm{loc}} |1,0\rangle$ or any element coupling different bulk occupations—decay to exactly zero or saturate at a nonzero value as $t\to\infty$ in the two-mode region; if they saturate, the $X$-state description and the concurrence and discord computed from it fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that in the region of the $(h,\mu)$ phase diagram where both localized edge modes $\gamma_1$ and $\gamma_2$ exist, the reduced density matrix of these two modes after a delta-kick at the impurity relaxes to the $X$-state of Eq. (10), with non-vanishing coherences $\rho_{14}(t)$ and $\rho_{23}(t)$ in the long-time limit. This $X$-state carries genuine quantum correlations, as quantified by concurrence and discord, and its emergence is signaled by the persistent, non-decaying oscillations of the response function and the out-of-time-order correlator. The authors argue that the $X$-structure arises because coherences between states with different bulk-mode occupations acquire rapidly oscillating phases and average out for times long compared to $J^{-1}$, leaving only the localized-mode sector with its diagonal and anti-diagonal elements. They further show that the two qubits are formed by the occupations of the two localized fermionic modes, and that the state cannot form in regions with fewer than two localized modes.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that, after a long time, every quantum connection between states that differ in how many excitations sit in the bulk of the chain averages out to zero, leaving the two edge modes in a density matrix whose only nonzero off-diagonal entries are the two corner terms; if any such connection survives, the state is not exactly an X-state and the computed concurrence and discord are only approximations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single local delta-kick on the edge impurity serves as a state-preparation protocol for an entangled two-qubit state in a many-body system, with the qubits stored in the two localized edge modes.
  • The long-time persistence of the response function and the OTOC is a direct witness of the $X$-state: if these functions decay, no $X$-state forms.
  • In regions of the phase diagram with fewer than two localized modes, the reduced density matrix does not take the $X$ form; the $X$-state is exclusive to the two-mode region.
  • The concurrence and discord of the $X$-state are nonzero and reach a maximum at small but finite impurity strength $\mu$, vanish at the boundary where the $\gamma_2$ mode disappears, and are enhanced when the kick strength $g_0$ is increased toward $\pi/2$.
  • By the Kramers-Wannier duality $h \to h^{-1}$, the same $X$-state results carry over to the boundary-impurity model studied in Ref. [17].

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the paper works in the $N\to\infty$ limit, a finite chain will have discrete bulk modes; the dephasing that produces the $X$-form may fail after the Heisenberg time (of order $N/J$), so a finite-size version of the protocol would reveal revivals and a breakdown of the $X$-state description at long times.
  • The protocol is a single-shot 'kick-and-wait' preparation; replacing the delta-kick with a finite-width pulse would test how robust the $X$-state is to realistic control, and one could map the concurrence as a function of pulse duration and strength.
  • Since the $\gamma_2$ mode is a partially separated Andreev bound state, the two-qubit state may be readable in tunneling spectroscopy of semiconductor-superconductor heterostructures, where the occupations of the two edge modes would appear as distinct conductance features.
  • The persistent boundary oscillations noted by the authors resemble boundary time crystals; a concrete extension is to check whether the long-time state strictly breaks time-translation symmetry or merely oscillates in a finite system.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the nonequilibrium response of a transverse-field Ising chain with an edge impurity to a local delta-kick at the boundary. Using the exact fermionic (Bogoliubov) solution, it argues that in the region of the (h, \mu) phase diagram where two localized edge modes exist, the reduced density matrix of these two modes relaxes to an X-state with persistent coherences. The authors compute the response function and the out-of-time-order correlator, showing that the localized modes trap excitations and information, and then characterize the reduced state through purity, concurrence, and discord, concluding that it exhibits genuine quantum correlations.

Significance. If correct, the paper provides a concrete, analytically solvable many-body model in which a local perturbation prepares an entangled two-qubit state in localized edge modes. The combination of exact free-fermion techniques, a Pfaffian-based OTOC calculation, and a quantum-information characterization is a useful methodological contribution. The connection between boundary phase structure and the emergence of X-states is also conceptually appealing. However, the central quantitative claim depends on the explicit entries of the reduced density matrix, and one of these entries is computed with an incompletely defined amplitude, which compromises the reported concurrence and discord values.

major comments (2)
  1. [Supplemental Material, Eqs. (38)-(39)] The quantity \Upsilon_1 is defined as -1 + 2 \sum_k v_k^2 with the sum restricted to delocalized modes only. The vacuum amplitude of \sigma^z_1|0\rangle is instead -1 + 2 \sum_{\kappa} v_{1\kappa}^2, where the sum runs over all modes including the localized modes \gamma_1 and \gamma_2. Equations (14)-(15) of the Supplemental Material show that v^{(1)}_1 and v^{(2)}_1 are nonzero in the yellow region. Omitting these contributions changes \rho_{11} and \rho_{14} in Eq. (38) and breaks the trace normalization Tr \rho_{\rm loc} = 1. Since the concurrence and discord displayed in Fig. 4 and in the Supplemental Material Figs. 5-6 are computed from these entries, the reported quantitative results are not reliable until the full sum is used and normalization is verified. The authors should also confirm positivity of the corrected \rho_{\rm loc}(t).
  2. [Supplemental Material, "Reduced state for the localized modes", Eq. (34)] The X-state form of \rho_{\rm loc}(t) does not actually rely on the dephasing argument presented around Eq. (34). The partial trace in Eq. (35) sums over identical bulk occupation numbers, so coherences between Fock states with different bulk occupations never contribute to \rho_{\rm loc} at any time. The rapid-oscillation discussion is therefore not the mechanism that selects the X structure; the structure follows exactly from particle-number conservation, because \sigma^z_1 creates either zero or two excitations. The derivation should be revised to state this correctly, as the current explanation is misleading even though the X-state form itself is exact.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Main text, around Eq. (5)] The notation f_{\kappa\kappa'} is used for the two-particle amplitudes in the response function and later redefined implicitly for the localized modes in the X-state section; please make the notation consistent and explicitly define the wave-function labels in both places.
  2. [Main text, after Eq. (1)] The reference for the Kramers-Wannier duality is missing; the text contains a placeholder "[ ? ]" that should be replaced with the appropriate citation.
  3. [Supplemental Material, "OTOC calculation"] The sentence "As we saw in the Sec. , to calculate C(t, \mu)" contains an empty section reference; please fill in the correct section number.
  4. [Supplemental Material, Eq. (38)] The summation restriction in \rho_{11} is written as "kk'(k\neq k)" which is ambiguous; it should be written as k \neq k'.
  5. [Main text, Fig. 4 and SM Figs. 5-6] The manuscript does not explicitly state the time at which the purity, concurrence, and discord are evaluated. Although the magnitudes of \rho_{14}(t) and \rho_{23}(t) are time-independent, a clear statement about the long-time limit would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the X-state and its quantum correlations are derived from the model's exact diagonalization and standard formulas, with no fitted input or load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. The reduced state ρloc(t) is obtained by applying the delta-kick state |Ψ(t)⟩ = (cos g0 1 + i sin g0 e^{-iH0t} σz₁)|0⟩ (SM Eq. (31)) and tracing out the delocalized modes (SM Eq. (35)). The X-shape of Eq. (10)/(37) follows from the structure of the partial trace (equal bulk occupations on both sides) and from the even-parity action of σz₁ on the vacuum; it is not assumed as an ansatz. The nonzero entries ρ11,... ρ14, ρ23 are explicit functions of the Bogoliubov coefficients uκ, vκ of the exact solution quoted from Ref. [13] (SM Eqs. (38)-(43)), and the concurrence and discord are evaluated with standard literature formulas (Refs. [45,49,54]). No parameter is fitted to the predicted quantities: h, μ, and g0 are control parameters scanned over the phase diagram. The self-citations that appear (Refs. [7,8,33,34]) concern general background on dissipation and scrambling and are not load-bearing for the X-state claim. The duality with Ref. [17] is used only to extend the same results to a dual model, not to generate them. A separate internal-consistency issue in SM Eqs. (38)-(39) (Υ1 is written as -1 + 2∑_k v_k² over delocalized modes only, while the vacuum amplitude of σz₁ should include the localized-mode v(ℓ) as well, which would affect Tr ρloc) is a correctness concern, not a circularity, since it does not make any result equivalent to its input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the exact free-fermion solution of the impurity model from Ref. [13], on a standard Pfaffian reduction for the OTOC from Ref. [37], and on a long-time dephasing assumption that discards coherences with different bulk-mode occupations. No parameters are fitted to data: h, μ, g0 are model/control parameters. No new entities are introduced.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math The Jordan-Wigner transformation maps the spin chain to a free fermionic p-wave superconductor.
    Used in Eq. (2) and SM 'Model'.
  • domain assumption The edge impurity model was solved analytically in Ref. [13]; all mode wavefunctions and energies (SM Eqs. 14-16) are taken from that solution.
    The localized mode existence regions and expressions are used without re-derivation.
  • standard math The OTOC can be evaluated as a Pfaffian via Wick's theorem (Ref. [37]).
    Used in SM 'OTOC calculation'.
  • domain assumption In the thermodynamic limit N→∞, exponentially small corrections are neglected, in particular Γ(1)→0 and ψ(1)_1→0.
    Used throughout for the γ1 zero-energy mode; finite-size corrections are neglected.
  • domain assumption Long-time dephasing: rapidly oscillating coherences between states with different bulk-mode occupations sum to zero for t≫J^{-1}.
    Load-bearing for the X-state form; see SM Eq. (34).
  • domain assumption The initial state is the ground state |0⟩, the fermionic vacuum of γκ, and the kick is a perfect delta pulse.
    Used in Eq. (31) for |Ψ(t)⟩.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Emergence of $X$ states in a quantum impurity model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QO6V737X

@misc{pith2026250113914,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Emergence of $X$ states in a quantum impurity model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QO6V737X}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.13914}
}
abstract

In the present work, we demonstrate the emergence of $X$ states in the long-time response of a locally perturbed many-body quantum impurity model. The emergence of the double-qubit state is heralded by the lack of decay of the response function as well as the out-of-time order correlator, signifying the trapping of excitations and hence information in edge modes. Surprisingly, after carrying out a quantum information theory characterization, we show that such states exhibit genuine quantum correlations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.13914 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Sketch of the model in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (c) shows the results for the ferromagnetic phase, h < 1. In the region where only the mode γ1 is present (µ < p 1 + 1/h), the scaling behavior t −3/2 is exactly the same as that observed in the paramagnetic re￾gion (when γ2 exists). Similarly to the paramagnetic side, the power-law decay changes at the boundary between two different phases. Along µ = p 1 + 1/h, a much slower decay can be observed, that is, Φ(t ≫ J … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. depicts the results for C(t, µ). Regardless of the region in the (h, µ)-diagram, C(t, µ) reaches a maxi￾mum value around t ≈ J −1 , and for t ≳ J −1 it transits to another behavior. When t ≫ J −1 , we can see how the presence of the impurity modifies the behavior of the OTOC (7). In the paramagnetic phase, Figs. 3(a, b) show three distinct behaviors. First, without localized modes, C(t ≫ J −1 , µ) decays to zero acc… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Purity (blue), concurrence (green), and discord (red) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Purity, concurrence and discord for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Purity, concurrence and discord for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [17]

    Javed, J

    U. Javed, J. Marino, V . Oganesyan, and M. Kolodrubetz, Counting edge modes via dynamics of boundary spin impu- rities, Phys. Rev. B 108, L140301 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [1]

    |0⟩ (see Suppl. Mat. [22]). Motivated by the correspondence between the existence of the modes γ1,2, the behavior of the response and OTOC functions, and the decay of coherences induced by the per- turbation between states with different occupations of lo- calized and delocalized modes (see Suppl. Mat. [22]), we trace out the delocalized modes to obtain t...

    work page 2023

  3. [2]

    C. D. Bruzewicz, J. Chiaverini, R. McConnell, and J. M. Sage, Trapped-ion quantum computing: Progress and chal- lenges, Appl. Phys. Rev. 6, 021314 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [3]

    acknowledges the support of CNPq, under Grant No

    M.V .S.B. acknowledges the support of CNPq, under Grant No. 304120/2022-7. E.M. acknowledges the sup- port of CNPq, under Grant No. 309584/2021-3. The work was also financed (M.V .S.B. and E.M.), in part, by the 6 São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), Brazil, Process Number 2022/15453-0. S.D. and M.F.C. acknowledge sup- port from the John Templeton Foun...

    work page 2022

  5. [4]

    B. C. Sanders, How to Build a Quantum Computer , 2399- 2891 (IOP Publishing, 2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [5]

    Ezratty, Perspective on superconducting qubit quantum computing, Eur

    O. Ezratty, Perspective on superconducting qubit quantum computing, Eur. Phys. J. A 59, 94 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [6]

    Wintersperger, F

    K. Wintersperger, F. Dommert, T. Ehmer, A. Hoursanov, J. Klepsch, W. Mauerer, G. Reuber, T. Strohm, M. Yin, and S. Luber, Neutral atom quantum computing hardware: per- formance and end-user perspective, EPJ Quantum Technol- ogy 10, 32 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [7]

    Slussarenko and G

    S. Slussarenko and G. J. Pryde, Photonic quantum infor- mation processing: A concise review, Appl. Phys. Rev. 6, 041303 (2019)

    work page 2019

Show all 66 references
  1. [8]

    M. F. Cavalcante, M. V . S. Bonança, E. Miranda, and S. Deffner, Nanowelding of quantum spin- 1 2 chains at min- imal dissipation, Phys. Rev. B 110, 064304 (2024)

    2024

  2. [9]

    Whaley and G

    B. Whaley and G. Milburn, Focus on coherent control of complex quantum systems, New J. Phys.17, 100202 (2015)

    2015

  3. [10]

    Soriani, E

    A. Soriani, E. Miranda, S. Deffner, and M. V . S. Bonança, Shortcuts to thermodynamic quasistaticity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 170602 (2022)

    2022

  4. [11]

    Vasseur, J

    R. Vasseur, J. P. Dahlhaus, and J. E. Moore, Univer- sal nonequilibrium signatures of majorana zero modes in quench dynamics, Phys. Rev. X 4, 041007 (2014)

    2014

  5. [12]

    Vasseur, K

    R. Vasseur, K. Trinh, S. Haas, and H. Saleur, Crossover physics in the nonequilibrium dynamics of quenched quan- tum impurity systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 240601 (2013)

    2013

  6. [13]

    D. M. Kennes, V . Meden, and R. Vasseur, Universal quench dynamics of interacting quantum impurity systems, Phys. Rev. B 90, 115101 (2014)

    2014

  7. [14]

    Bertini and M

    B. Bertini and M. Fagotti, Determination of the nonequilib- rium steady state emerging from a defect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 130402 (2016)

    2016

  8. [15]

    Schiró and A

    M. Schiró and A. Mitra, Transport across an impurity in one-dimensional quantum liquids far from equilibrium, Phys. Rev. B 91, 235126 (2015)

    2015

  9. [16]

    Francica, T

    G. Francica, T. J. G. Apollaro, N. Lo Gullo, and F. Plastina, Local quench, majorana zero modes, and disturbance prop- agation in the ising chain, Phys. Rev. B 94, 245103 (2016)

    2016

  10. [18]

    B. Dóra, M. A. Werner, and C. P. Moca, Information scram- bling at an impurity quantum critical point, Phys. Rev. B96, 155116 (2017)

    2017

  11. [19]

    Bragança, M

    H. Bragança, M. F. Cavalcante, R. G. Pereira, and M. C. O. Aguiar, Quench dynamics and relaxation of a spin coupled to interacting leads, Phys. Rev. B 103, 125152 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    E. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis, Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain, Annals of Physics 16, 407 (1961)

    1961

  13. [21]

    Larzul, A

    A. Larzul, A. M. Sengupta, A. Georges, and M. Schirò, Fast scrambling at the boundary, arXiv preprint, arXiv:2407.13617 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    A. R. P. Rau, Algebraic characterization of x-states in quan- tum information, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 42, 412002 (2009)

    2009

  15. [23]

    A. Y . Kitaev, Unpaired majorana fermions in quantum wires, Physics-Uspekhi 44, 131 (2001)

    2001

  16. [24]

    Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge, 1999)

    S. Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge, 1999)

    1999

  17. [25]

    Supplemental material

  18. [26]

    DeGottardi, M

    W. DeGottardi, M. Thakurathi, S. Vishveshwara, and D. Sen, Majorana fermions in superconducting wires: Ef- fects of long-range hopping, broken time-reversal symme- try, and potential landscapes, Phys. Rev. B 88, 165111 (2013)

    2013

  19. [27]

    Alicea, New directions in the pursuit of majorana fermions in solid state systems, Reports on Progress in Physics 75, 076501 (2012)

    J. Alicea, New directions in the pursuit of majorana fermions in solid state systems, Reports on Progress in Physics 75, 076501 (2012)

    2012

  20. [28]

    For a sufficiently small value ofg0, the impulse is weak and the response function (4) describes how ⟨σz 1(t)⟩ evolves [30]

    is the response function, Φ(t, µ) = i 23 ⟨[σz 1(t), σz 1(0)]⟩0, (4) where σz 1(t) = eiH0tσz 1e−iH0t is the operator σz 1 in the Heisenberg representation [29] and ⟨· · · ⟩0 ≡ ⟨0| · · · |0⟩. For a sufficiently small value ofg0, the impulse is weak and the response function (4) ...

  21. [29]

    Moore, T

    C. Moore, T. D. Stanescu, and S. Tewari, Two-terminal charge tunneling: Disentangling majorana zero modes from partially separated andreev bound states in semiconductor- superconductor heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B 97, 165302 (2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    E. J. Meier, F. A. An, and B. Gadway, Observation of the topological soliton state in the su–schrieffer–heeger model, Nature Communications 7, 13986 (2016)

    2016

  23. [31]

    Cheneau, P

    M. Cheneau, P. Barmettler, D. Poletti, M. Endres, P. Schauß, T. Fukuhara, C. Gross, I. Bloch, C. Kollath, and S. Kuhr, Light-cone-like spreading of correlations in a quantum many-body system, Nature 481, 484 (2012)

    2012

  24. [32]

    Coleman, Introduction to Many-Body Physics (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015)

    P. Coleman, Introduction to Many-Body Physics (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015)

    2015

  25. [33]

    R. Kubo, M. Toda, and N. Hashitsume, Statistical Physics II: Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics , V ol. 2 (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 1991)

    1991

  26. [34]

    Huang, Y .-T

    Y .-H. Huang, Y .-T. Zou, and C. Ding, Dynamical relaxation of a long-range kitaev chain, Phys. Rev. B 109, 094309 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    D. A. Roberts and B. Swingle, Lieb-robinson bound and the butterfly effect in quantum field theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 091602 (2016)

    2016

  28. [36]

    Touil and S

    A. Touil and S. Deffner, Information scrambling – a quan- tum thermodynamic perspective, EPL (Europhys. Lett.) 146, 48001 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    Touil and S

    A. Touil and S. Deffner, Quantum scrambling and the growth of mutual information, Quantum Sci. Technol. 5, 035005 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    Tripathy, A

    D. Tripathy, A. Touil, B. Gardas, and S. Deffner, Quantum information scrambling in two-dimensional Bose-Hubbard lattices, Chaos 34, 043121 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Dóra and R

    B. Dóra and R. Moessner, Out-of-time-ordered density cor- relators in luttinger liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 026802 (2017)

    2017

  32. [40]

    Lin and O

    C.-J. Lin and O. I. Motrunich, Out-of-time-ordered corre- lators in a quantum ising chain, Phys. Rev. B 97, 144304 (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    Sedlmayr, H

    M. Sedlmayr, H. Cheraghi, and N. Sedlmayr, Information trapping by topologically protected edge states: Scrambling and the butterfly velocity, Phys. Rev. B108, 184303 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    Bin, L.-L

    Q. Bin, L.-L. Wan, F. Nori, Y . Wu, and X.-Y . Lü, Out-of- 7 time-order correlation as a witness for topological phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B 107, L020202 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Kheiri, H

    S. Kheiri, H. Cheraghi, S. Mahdavifar, and N. Sedlmayr, Information propagation in one-dimensional xy−Γ chains, Phys. Rev. B 109, 134303 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    Sur and D

    S. Sur and D. Sen, Effects of topological and non- topological edge states on information propagation and scrambling in a floquet spin chain, Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter 36, 125402 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    Muruganandam, M

    V . Muruganandam, M. Sajjan, and S. Kais, Defect-induced localization of information scrambling in 1d kitaev model, Physica Scripta 99, 105123 (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    Ollivier and W

    H. Ollivier and W. H. Zurek, Quantum discord: A mea- sure of the quantumness of correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 017901 (2001)

    2001

  39. [47]

    Yu and J

    T. Yu and J. H. Eberly, Finite-time disentanglement via spontaneous emission, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 140404 (2004)

    2004

  40. [48]

    Yu and J

    T. Yu and J. Eberly, Sudden death of entanglement: Classi- cal noise effects, Optics Communications 264, 393 (2006)

    2006

  41. [49]

    M. F. m. c. Santos, P. Milman, L. Davidovich, and N. Za- gury, Direct measurement of finite-time disentanglement in- duced by a reservoir, Phys. Rev. A73, 040305 (2006)

    2006

  42. [50]

    Al-Qasimi and D

    A. Al-Qasimi and D. F. V . James, Sudden death of entangle- ment at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. A77, 012117 (2008)

    2008

  43. [51]

    M. S. Sarandy, Classical correlation and quantum discord in critical systems, Phys. Rev. A 80, 022108 (2009)

    2009

  44. [52]

    M. Ali, A. R. P. Rau, and G. Alber, Quantum discord for two-qubit x states, Phys. Rev. A 81, 042105 (2010)

    2010

  45. [53]

    Galve, G

    F. Galve, G. L. Giorgi, and R. Zambrini, Maximally discor- dant mixed states of two qubits, Phys. Rev. A 83, 012102 (2011)

    2011

  46. [54]

    Q. Chen, C. Zhang, S. Yu, X. X. Yi, and C. H. Oh, Quan- tum discord of two-qubit x states, Phys. Rev. A 84, 042313 (2011)

    2011

  47. [55]

    X.-M. Lu, J. Ma, Z. Xi, and X. Wang, Optimal measure- ments to access classical correlations of two-qubit states, Phys. Rev. A 83, 012327 (2011)

    2011

  48. [56]

    Quesada, A

    N. Quesada, A. Al-Qasimi, and D. F. James, Quantum prop- erties and dynamics of x states, Journal of Modern Optics 59, 1322 (2012)

    2012

  49. [57]

    Huang, Quantum discord for two-qubit x states: Analyt- ical formula with very small worst-case error, Phys

    Y . Huang, Quantum discord for two-qubit x states: Analyt- ical formula with very small worst-case error, Phys. Rev. A 88, 014302 (2013)

    2013

  50. [58]

    W. F. Balthazar, D. G. Braga, V . S. Lamego, M. H. M. Pas- sos, and J. A. O. Huguenin, Spin-orbit x states, Phys. Rev. A 103, 022411 (2021)

    2021

  51. [59]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum computation and quantum information (Cambridge university press, 2010)

    2010

  52. [60]

    Xiang, Y .-W

    D.-S. Xiang, Y .-W. Zhang, H.-X. Liu, P. Zhou, D. Yuan, K. Zhang, S.-Y . Zhang, B. Xu, L. Liu, Y . Li, and L. Li, Ob- servation of quantum information collapse-and-revival in a strongly-interacting rydberg atom array, arXiv:2410.15455 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Liang, Z

    X. Liang, Z. Yue, Y .-X. Chao, Z.-X. Hua, Y . Lin, M. K. Tey, and L. You, Observation of anomalous information scram- bling in a rydberg atom array, arXiv:2410.16174 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Iemini, A

    F. Iemini, A. Russomanno, J. Keeling, M. Schirò, M. Dal- monte, and R. Fazio, Boundary time crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 035301 (2018)

    2018

  55. [63]

    Losonczi, Eigenvalues and eigenvectors of some tridiag- onal matrices, Acta Mathematica Hungarica60, 309 (1992)

    L. Losonczi, Eigenvalues and eigenvectors of some tridiag- onal matrices, Acta Mathematica Hungarica60, 309 (1992)

    1992

  56. [64]

    Yueh, Eigenvalues of several tridiagonal matri- ces, Applied Mathematics E-Notes [electronic only] 5, 66 (2005)

    W.-C. Yueh, Eigenvalues of several tridiagonal matri- ces, Applied Mathematics E-Notes [electronic only] 5, 66 (2005). SUPPLEMENTAL MA TERIAL In this Supplementary Material, we provide details on (i) the impurity model, (ii) the OTOC calculations, (iii) the long-time behaviors...

    2005

  57. [65]

    (4)) once we make h−1 → h and identify ηB,0 as the ancilla Majorana fermion defined there

    (see its Eq. (4)) once we make h−1 → h and identify ηB,0 as the ancilla Majorana fermion defined there. OTOC CALCULA TION Here, we are interested in the OTOC, C(t, µ) = 1 2 ⟨|[σz 1(t), σz 1(0)]|2⟩0, = 1 − Re{F (t, µ)}, (19) 9 where F (t, µ) = ⟨σz 1(t)σz 1(0)σz 1(t)σz 1(0)⟩0 an...

  58. [66]

    Us- ing the Dirac delta function property, |Ψ(t)⟩ = cos g01 + i sin g0e−iH0tσz 1 |0⟩, (31) where it was considered that H0|0⟩ = 0

    The system state at time t >0 will be given by |Ψ(t)⟩ = e−iH0tT exp −i Z t 0 dt′δH (t′) |0⟩, (30) where δH (t) = −g0δ(t)σz 1(t), with σz 1(t) = eiH0tσz 1e−iH0t, and T is the time ordering operator. Us- ing the Dirac delta function property, |Ψ(t)⟩ = cos g01 + i sin g0e−iH0tσz ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.