Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 35 references

Enhanced PEC-YOLO for Detecting Improper Safety Gear Wearing Among Power Line Workers

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read PEC-YOLO, a modified YOLOv8s, detects improper safety-gear use among power-line workers with a 2.7-point mAP@0.5 gain, 42.6% fewer parameters, and four times the frame rate.

desk verdict A routine but clearly written YOLOv8s variant with a plausible mAP gain, and a speed claim whose own ablation table undermines; send to review, but demand a reproducible benchmark. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.13981 v1 pith:DJUEV454 submitted 2025-01-23 cs.CV eess.IV

Chen Zuguo , Kuang Aowei , Huang Yi , Jin Jie This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CVeess.IV
keywords PEC-YOLOsafetygeardetectionpowerlineworkersYOLOv8partialconvolutionattentionmechanismBiFPNlightweightobject
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a deliberately modified YOLOv8s detector, called PEC-YOLO, can identify improper safety-gear use among power-line workers more accurately, with far fewer parameters, and at a much higher frame rate than the baseline. On a public dataset of power-line construction scenes, the reported gain is 2.7 percentage points in mAP@0.5 (77.2% to 79.9%), a 42.59% parameter reduction (11.13M to 6.38M), and a speed increase from 125.0 to 526.3 FPS. If these results hold, the method offers a practical path to low-cost edge deployment of real-time safety monitoring in cluttered, high-risk work sites.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the synergy of three modifications inside the YOLOv8s pipeline: PConv in the bottleneck reduces FLOPs to 1/16 and memory access to 1/4 of a standard convolution by operating on a contiguous quarter of channels; EMA attention groups channel sub-features and aggregates them across spatial dimensions to preserve channel integrity cheaply; CPCA reweights both channels and spatial positions, with bar-shaped multi-scale depthwise kernels, after SPPF pooling; and BiFPN replaces PANet with weighted bidirectional cross-scale feature fusion. Each component is designed to lower parameter count and computation while keeping or improving accuracy.

What would settle it

Reproduce the four ablation configurations from Table 2 on the same dataset and GPU, with one fixed FPS measurement protocol (same batch size, same warm-up, same inference path). If adding SPPF CPCA does not cause a drop to about 64 FPS and adding BiFPN does not recover to about 526 FPS under that fixed protocol, then the reported speed advantage and the 'under identical conditions' claim are not reproducible.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

PEC-YOLO is YOLOv8s with three surgical replacements. The backbone's C2F module becomes 'C2F Faster EMA,' where Partial Convolution (PConv) computes on only a quarter of the channels to cut computation and memory traffic, and EMA attention regroups channels to preserve cross-spatial information. The SPPF pooling module gains CPCA (Channel Prior Convolution Attention), which applies channel attention first, then a multi-scale depthwise-separable spatial attention weighted by channel priors. The neck's PANet is replaced by BiFPN, which fuses top-down and bottom-up features with learned per-scale weights. In the paper's experiments on a four-class power-line safety dataset, this combination reaches 79.9% mAP@0.5 and 63.4% mAP@0.5:0.95, with 6.38M parameters and 526.3 FPS, beating YOLOv8s and several one- and two-stage baselines.

Load-bearing premise

The reported FPS numbers are measured under identical, fair conditions and accurately compare real inference speed; if the 625.0 → 63.7 → 526.3 FPS swings across the ablation configurations came from inconsistent measurement settings, the claim of a roughly 400 FPS speed advantage loses its support.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The reported 42.59% parameter cut moves the detector into edge-device range while the mAP@0.5 gain holds, so on-site cameras could run the model locally rather than streaming to a server.
  • A 526 FPS inference rate is far above real-time needs at 640×640 input, leaving room for multi-camera feeds or higher-resolution inputs.
  • The 4.9-point recall improvement means fewer missed safety violations, which is the failure mode that matters for injury prevention.
  • The model's higher accuracy at the lenient IoU=0.5 threshold suits downstream alarm systems, where coarse localization is enough to trigger a warning.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the same PConv+EMA+CPCA+BiFPN recipe would likely generalize to other PPE-detection domains such as helmets, vests, and gloves, but the paper presents no evidence for that transfer.
  • Beyond the paper, the FPS figures are reported on an RTX 3090 at 640×640 input; on typical edge hardware the absolute speeds would drop, so the practical deployment gain depends on the target hardware.
  • Beyond the paper, the ablation path suggests SPPF CPCA is computation-heavy and BiFPN is what restores speed; a module-level latency breakdown would clarify which component is safe to use when speed is the priority.
  • Beyond the paper, since part of the improvement comes from PConv's memory-access savings, the 400 FPS advantage may not hold on hardware where memory bandwidth is not the bottleneck.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes PEC-YOLO, an improved YOLOv8-based detector for identifying improper safety gear usage among power line workers. The method combines PConv and EMA attention in a redesigned C2F bottleneck, adds a CPCA attention module to SPPF, and replaces the PANet neck with BiFPN. On a dataset from the Alibaba Tianchi competition, the authors report that PEC-YOLO improves mAP@0.5 from 77.2% to 79.9% relative to YOLOv8s, reduces parameters by about 42.6%, and increases detection speed from 125.0 to 526.3 FPS. The paper includes ablation studies, comparisons with several one- and two-stage detectors, qualitative detection examples, and heatmap visualizations.

Significance. If the reported results are reproducible, the work offers a practical lightweight detector for a real-world safety-monitoring task, with a modest accuracy gain and a substantial parameter reduction. The authors provide code and compare against standard baselines, which supports reproducibility. However, the headline speed advantage rests on FPS measurements that are internally inconsistent and lack a documented benchmarking protocol, and the accuracy gain is reported without error bars or significance testing. These issues currently prevent the central claims from being verified.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.5, Table 2] The detection speed values in Table 2 are not credible under a single measurement protocol: adding SPPF CPCA (row 2 to row 3) drops FPS from 625.0 to 63.7, a 10x slowdown, and then switching to BiFPN (row 3 to row 4) raises FPS to 526.3, an 8x recovery. Such dramatic swings are not explained by the architectural changes, and the paper does not specify whether timing includes data loading, preprocessing, warm-up iterations, batch size, FP16/AMP, TensorRT, or torch.compile. Equation (12) defines FPS but gives no measurement details. Because the abstract's "nearly 400 FPS" speed advantage over YOLOv8s is a central contribution, the authors must provide a complete and reproducible benchmarking protocol and re-report the FPS values with repeated trials and standard deviations.
  2. [Section 4.5 and 4.6] All experiments appear to be single runs with no multiple seeds, error bars, or statistical significance tests. The reported mAP@0.5 gain of 2.7 percentage points (77.2 to 79.9) may be within run-to-run variation, especially given the small validation and test sets (255 and 509 images, respectively). The authors should report mean and standard deviation over at least 3–5 random seeds for both the ablation and comparison tables, and ideally a paired significance test for the main comparison.
  3. [Section 4.5, paragraph on mAP@0.5 vs mAP@0.5:0.95] The paper justifies the C2F Faster EMA module partly by stating that mAP@0.5 is "a more critical metric" than mAP@0.5:0.95, yet this claim is asserted without support and is used to dismiss a 0.8% drop in mAP@0.5:0.95 in Experiment 2. This is not a principled evaluation criterion. The authors should either report both metrics without selectively weighting them, or provide a task-specific justification (e.g., based on deployment requirements) for why mAP@0.5 should dominate the assessment.
  4. [Section 4.6, Table 3] The text says baselines were trained "adhering to consistent experimental conditions" but also "followed the suggested training parameters of the comparative techniques." These statements conflict. If baselines were trained with their own recommended hyperparameters rather than the exact settings used for PEC-YOLO (e.g., 400 epochs, SGD, batch size 32), the comparison is not fully controlled. Please clarify the exact training settings for each baseline, and also reconcile the parameter count for PEC-YOLO, which is 6.38×10^6 in Table 3 but 6.39×10^6 in Table 2.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Section 4.5] The parameter reduction is quoted as 42.58% in the abstract and 42.59% in Section 4.5; using the Table 2 values (11.13 to 6.39) gives 42.59%, and Table 3 (6.38) gives a slightly different figure. Please unify the numbers.
  2. [Equation (12)] Equation (12) defines FPS as fn/T but does not state whether T includes image loading, preprocessing, and post-processing, or whether inference was performed with a batch size of 1. Please specify the exact timing scope.
  3. [Section 4.1] The dataset split is described as a random 7:1:2 division, but no random seed is given. Reporting the seed or the exact image indices used for the split would improve reproducibility.
  4. [Section 3.3] There is a typo in the EMA description: "S.ubsequently" should read "Subsequently."
  5. [Tables 4 and 5] The qualitative results in Tables 4 and 5 are presented as image panels without quantitative captions; adding a brief explanation of what each row demonstrates (as is done in the text) directly in the captions would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: PEC-YOLO is an empirical combination of externally published modules, benchmarked against standard baselines, and no reported result reduces by construction to its own inputs.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is an empirical engineering contribution, not a formal derivation. Each proposed component (PConv, EMA, CPCA, BiFPN) is adopted from prior published work and integrated into YOLOv8s, and the central claims are measured experimental outcomes reported in Tables 2 and 3. The mAP, recall, parameter count, and FPS values are computed from evaluation on the Alibaba Tianchi dataset against external baselines such as YOLOv5s, YOLOv7, YOLOv8s, SSD, CenterNet, and Faster R-CNN; none of these quantities is defined in terms of the proposed modules, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The paper does not rely on a self-citation chain to justify its contribution: the CPCA module is cited to Huang et al. (2024), a peer-reviewed publication, and the other modules cite independent prior work. There is no uniqueness theorem invoked from the authors' own prior work, and no ansatz is smuggled in via self-citation. The only concerns visible in the manuscript, such as the post hoc emphasis on mAP@0.5 after observing a decrease in mAP@0.5:0.95 in one ablation step, and the lack of a detailed FPS measurement protocol behind the large speed swings in Table 2, are correctness, reproducibility, and reporting issues rather than circularity. They do not make any claim equivalent to its input by definition. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks, so the appropriate circularity finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rely on a handful of hand-set hyperparameters (NMS IoU, input size, epochs) and on domain assumptions about dataset quality, metric priority, and FPS comparability. No new physical or mathematical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • NMS IoU threshold = 0.3
    Set in Section 4.2; not swept, affects both speed and accuracy.
  • Input image size = 640x640x3
    Fixed in Section 4.2; larger inputs improve accuracy but reduce speed.
  • Training epochs = 400
    Section 4.2; baselines trained with their own suggested epochs, so training effort is not identical.
  • Per-method hyperparameters = not specified
    Section 4.6 says baselines used their suggested training parameters, meaning the comparison is not strictly controlled.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The Tianchi dataset annotations are correct and representative of power-line safety scenarios.
    Section 4.1 describes the dataset but provides no annotation quality or label noise analysis.
  • ad hoc to paper mAP@0.5 is the more important metric than mAP@0.5:0.95 for this application.
    Section 4.5 asserts this after Experiment 2 shows a drop in mAP@0.5:0.95, making the metric choice favorable to the proposed method.
  • domain assumption The FPS measurements are comparable across all conditions.
    Section 4.5 Table 2 reports FPS values that swing by 10x across ablations, yet no measurement protocol is given, so comparability is assumed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Enhanced PEC-YOLO for Detecting Improper Safety Gear Wearing Among Power Line Workers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DJUEV454

@misc{pith2026250113981,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Enhanced PEC-YOLO for Detecting Improper Safety Gear Wearing Among Power Line Workers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DJUEV454}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.13981}
}
read the original abstract

To address the high risks associated with improper use of safety gear in complex power line environments, where target occlusion and large variance are prevalent, this paper proposes an enhanced PEC-YOLO object detection algorithm. The method integrates deep perception with multi-scale feature fusion, utilizing PConv and EMA attention mechanisms to enhance feature extraction efficiency and minimize model complexity. The CPCA attention mechanism is incorporated into the SPPF module, improving the model's ability to focus on critical information and enhance detection accuracy, particularly in challenging conditions. Furthermore, the introduction of the BiFPN neck architecture optimizes the utilization of low-level and high-level features, enhancing feature representation through adaptive fusion and context-aware mechanism. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed PEC-YOLO achieves a 2.7% improvement in detection accuracy compared to YOLOv8s, while reducing model parameters by 42.58%. Under identical conditions, PEC-YOLO outperforms other models in detection speed, meeting the stringent accuracy requirements for safety gear detection in construction sites. This study contributes to the development of efficient and accurate intelligent monitoring systems for ensuring worker safety in hazardous environments.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    : Convolutional neural networks for image classification

    barticle Bharadiya , J. : Convolutional neural networks for image classification . International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology 8 ( 5 ), 673 -- 677 ( 2023 ) barticle

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    , Terven , J

    barticle C \'o rdova-Esparza , M. , Terven , J. : A comprehensive review of yolo: from yolov1 to yolov8 and beyond . Mach. Learn. Knowl. Extr 5 , 1680 -- 1716 ( 2023 ) barticle

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    , Kao , S.-h

    bchapter Chen , J. , Kao , S.-h. , He , H. , Zhuo , W. , Wen , S. , Lee , C.-H. , Chan , S.-H.G. : Run, don't walk: chasing higher flops for faster neural networks . In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pp. 12021 -- 12031 ( 2023 ) bchapter

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    , Bai , S

    bchapter Duan , K. , Bai , S. , Xie , L. , Qi , H. , Huang , Q. , Tian , Q. : Centernet: Keypoint triplets for object detection . In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pp. 6569 -- 6578 ( 2019 ) bchapter

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    , Carin , L

    botherref Draelos , R.L. , Carin , L. : Use hirescam instead of grad-cam for faithful explanations of convolutional neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.08891 (2020) botherref

    arXiv 2020

  6. [6]

    , Qian , Y

    barticle Feng , P. , Qian , Y. , Fan , Y. , Wei , H. , Qin , Y. , Mo , W. : Improved cascade r-cnn-based helmet detection algorithm . Microelectronics & Computer 41 ( 1 ), 63 -- 73 ( 2024 ) barticle

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    , Yang , X

    barticle Fan , J. , Yang , X. , Lu , R. , Li , W. , Huang , Y. : Long-term visual tracking algorithm for uavs based on kernel correlation filtering and surf features . The Visual Computer 39 ( 1 ), 319 -- 333 ( 2023 ) barticle

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    , Donahue , J

    barticle Girshick , R. , Donahue , J. , Darrell , T. , Malik , J. : Region-based convolutional networks for accurate object detection and segmentation . IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 38 ( 1 ), 142 -- 158 ( 2015 ) barticle

    work page 2015

Show all 35 references
  1. [9]

    , Chen , Z

    barticle Huang , H. , Chen , Z. , Zou , Y. , Lu , M. , Chen , C. , Song , Y. , Zhang , H. , Yan , F. : Channel prior convolutional attention for medical image segmentation . Computers in Biology and Medicine 178 , 108784 ( 2024 ) barticle

    2024

  2. [10]

    , Qin , L

    barticle He , M. , Qin , L. , Zhao , F. , Yu , J. , Liu , H. , Wang , Q. , Xu , X. , Liu , K. : Smart detection algorithm for safety risk control in field operations of power systems . High Voltage Engineering 49 ( 06 ), 2442 -- 2457 ( 2023 ) 10.13336/j.1003-6520.hve.20222039 barticle

    2023 doi

  3. [11]

    , Sukthankar , R

    bchapter Ke , Y. , Sukthankar , R. : Pca-sift: A more distinctive representation for local image descriptors . In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004. , vol. 2 , p. ( 2004 ). IEEE bchapter

    2004

  4. [12]

    , Anguelov , D

    bchapter Liu , W. , Anguelov , D. , Erhan , D. , Szegedy , C. , Reed , S. , Fu , C.-Y. , Berg , A.C. : Ssd: Single shot multibox detector . In: Computer Vision--ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11--14, 2016, Proceedings, Part I 14 , pp. ...

    2016

  5. [13]

    , Doll \'a r , P

    bchapter Lin , T.-Y. , Doll \'a r , P. , Girshick , R. , He , K. , Hariharan , B. , Belongie , S. : Feature pyramid networks for object detection . In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pp. 2117 -- 2125 ( 2017 ) bchapter

    2017

  6. [14]

    , Li , Y

    barticle Lv , X. , Li , Y. , Li , Y. , Zhao , X. , Zhang , Z. : Research on safety management and evaluation system for substation construction personnel . Power System Protection and Control 49 ( 4 ), 21 -- 27 ( 2021 ) barticle

    2021

  7. [15]

    , Qi , L

    bchapter Liu , S. , Qi , L. , Qin , H. , Shi , J. , Jia , J. : Path aggregation network for instance segmentation . In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pp. 8759 -- 8768 ( 2018 ) bchapter

    2018

  8. [16]

    , Sun , J

    botherref Lin , X. , Sun , J. : Algorithm research on small target detection and tracking based on machine learning. Application Research of Computers 35(11) (2018) botherref

    2018

  9. [17]

    , Sun , S

    barticle Lin , X. , Sun , S. , Huang , W. , Sheng , B. , Li , P. , Feng , D.D. : Eapt: efficient attention pyramid transformer for image processing . IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 25 , 50 -- 61 ( 2021 ) barticle

    2021

  10. [18]

    , Yu , F

    barticle Luo , X. , Yu , F. , Peng , Y. : Research on defect detection for power grid inspection using drones based on deep learning . Power System Protection and Control 50 ( 10 ), 132 -- 140 ( 2022 ) barticle

    2022

  11. [19]

    , He , S

    bchapter Ouyang , D. , He , S. , Zhang , G. , Luo , M. , Guo , H. , Zhan , J. , Huang , Z. : Efficient multi-scale attention module with cross-spatial learning . In: ICASSP 2023-2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) , pp. 1 -- 5...

    2023

  12. [20]

    , Lei , Y

    barticle Peng , G. , Lei , Y. , Li , H. , Wu , D. , Wang , J. , Liu , F. : Cory-net: Contrastive res-yolov5 network for intelligent safety monitoring on power grid construction sites . IEEE Access 9 , 160461 -- 160470 ( 2021 ) barticle

    2021

  13. [21]

    , Wang , D

    bchapter Pan , Z. , Wang , D. , Yu , K. , Zhao , Z. , Yao , L. : Safety rope state detection in electricity field construction . In: 2021 33rd Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC) , pp. 3128 -- 3132 ( 2021 ). IEEE bchapter

    2021

  14. [22]

    , Ding , Y

    botherref Shi , T. , Ding , Y. , Zhu , K.-f. , Su , Y.-j. : Dfp-yolo: a lightweight machine tool workpiece defect detection algorithm based on computer vision. The Visual Computer, 1--13 (2024) botherref

    2024

  15. [23]

    , Liu , D

    barticle Su , T. , Liu , D. : Transmission line defect detection based on feature enhancement . Multimedia Tools and Applications 83 ( 12 ), 36419 -- 36431 ( 2024 ) barticle

    2024

  16. [24]

    , Pang , R

    bchapter Tan , M. , Pang , R. , Le , Q.V. : Efficientdet: Scalable and efficient object detection . In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pp. 10781 -- 10790 ( 2020 ) bchapter

    2020

  17. [25]

    , Su , D

    barticle Tian , Y. , Su , D. , Lauria , S. , Liu , X. : Recent advances on loss functions in deep learning for computer vision . Neurocomputing 497 , 129 -- 158 ( 2022 ) barticle

    2022

  18. [26]

    , Bochkovskiy , A

    bchapter Wang , C.-Y. , Bochkovskiy , A. , Liao , H.-Y.M. : Yolov7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of-the-art for real-time object detectors . In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pp. 7464 -- 7475 ( 2023 ) bchapter

    2023

  19. [27]

    , Luo , H

    barticle Wang , J. , Luo , H. , Yu , P. , Zheng , L. , Hu , F. : Multi-scale detection of high-voltage tower nests based on faster r-cnn . Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University 43 ( 5 ), 37 -- 43 ( 2019 ) barticle

    2019

  20. [28]

    , Xiao , N

    barticle Wang , H. , Xiao , N. : Underwater object detection method based on improved faster rcnn . Applied Sciences 13 ( 4 ), 2746 ( 2023 ) barticle

    2023

  21. [29]

    , Zhang , X

    barticle Wang , L. , Zhang , X. , Yang , H. : Safety helmet wearing detection model based on improved yolo-m . IEEE Access 11 , 26247 -- 26257 ( 2023 ) barticle

    2023

  22. [30]

    , Cheng , G

    bchapter Xie , X. , Cheng , G. , Wang , J. , Yao , X. , Han , J. : Oriented r-cnn for object detection . In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pp. 3520 -- 3529 ( 2021 ) bchapter

    2021

  23. [31]

    , Zhang , W

    barticle Xie , Z. , Zhang , W. , Sheng , B. , Li , P. , Chen , C.P. : Bagfn: broad attentive graph fusion network for high-order feature interactions . IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 34 ( 8 ), 4499 -- 4513 ( 2021 ) barticle

    2021

  24. [32]

    , Guo , Y

    barticle Yang , L. , Guo , Y. , Huo , Y. , Ren , X. , Lin , P. , Zhang , Z. : Application of improved yolov5 in power production violation detection . Power System Protection and Control 51 ( 14 ), 160 -- 168 ( 2023 ) barticle

    2023

  25. [33]

    , Lyu , S

    bchapter Zhu , X. , Lyu , S. , Wang , X. , Zhao , Q. : Tph-yolov5: Improved yolov5 based on transformer prediction head for object detection on drone-captured scenarios . In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pp. 2778 -- 2788 ( 2021 ) bchapter

    2021

  26. [34]

    , Tian , X

    barticle Zhang , M. , Tian , X. : Transformer architecture based on mutual attention for image-anomaly detection . Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 5 ( 1 ), 57 -- 67 ( 2023 ) barticle

    2023

  27. [35]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION string.to.integer 't := t text.length 'k := #1 'char.num := t char.num #1 substring 's := s is.num s "." = or char.num k = not and char.num #1 + 'char.num := while char.num #1 - 'char.num := t #1 char.num substring FUNCTI...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.