Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 51 references

Active bacterial baths in droplets

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes that a confined bacterial suspension acts on a passive tracer as colored noise with a constant memory time of 0.1–0.6 s and a diffusivity that collapses three decades when plotted against $nR/R_i$.

desk verdict Useful experimental scaling law for bacterial bath diffusivity in droplets, but the missing u_b cross-plot and lack of error bars leave the parameter extraction under-checked. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.14088 v1 pith:TJOTIHR4 submitted 2025-01-23 cond-mat.soft

Cristian Villalobos-Concha , Zhengyang Liu , Gabriel Ramos , Martyna Goral , Anke Lindner , Teresa López-León , Eric Clément , Rodrigo Soto
show 1 more author
María Luisa Cordero
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.soft
keywords activebathbacterialsuspensioncolorednoiseOrnstein–Uhlenbeckprocessenhanceddiffusionconfinementtracerdroplet
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks what a passive particle feels when trapped inside a droplet of swimming bacteria, and answers that the bacterial suspension acts as a stochastic bath with temporal memory rather than a thermal bath. By tracking buoyant tracers (solid beads and oil droplets) over a wide range of droplet radii, tracer radii, and bacterial densities, the authors show that the tracer motion is reproduced by an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck noise with a correlation time $\tau_b$ that stays roughly constant between 0.1 and 0.6 s. The bath diffusivity $D_b = u_b^2\tau_b$ grows linearly with $nR/R_i$, where $n$ is bacterial density, $R=R_o-R_i$ is the available space, and $R_i$ is the tracer radius; data from all experiments collapse onto one curve over three decades. If this holds, then a droplet's ability to stir and transport an encapsulated object is set by a single confinement–density variable, which is directly relevant to droplet bioreactors, cloud-droplet chemistry, and cell-like crowded environments.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process (OUP), a Gaussian stochastic velocity field with correlation $\langle u_i(t)u_j(t')\rangle = u_b^2\delta_{ij}e^{-|t-t'|/\tau_b}$. The tracer follows $\dot{\mathbf r} = \mathbf u - v_s\hat z$ inside a reflective spherical boundary, and the model is solved numerically over roughly 40,000 parameter pairs $(\tilde\tau_b,\tilde\ell_b)$; the experimental planar MSD is matched to the simulated MSD by minimizing a log-scale chi-squared with the sedimentation time as a third fit parameter. This machinery converts complicated swimmer hydrodynamics into two effective bath parameters, $\tau_b$ and $D_b=u_b^2\tau_b$, whose values can then be compared across geometries.

What would settle it

Measure the tracer's velocity autocorrelation directly from 3D tracks: if it does not decay as a single exponential with $\tau_b$ between 0.1 and 0.6 s for all wall distances and densities, or if the velocity-increment distribution shows non-Gaussian tails, the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck bath description is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that momentum transfer from a confined bacterial suspension to a passive tracer is described by colored noise with $\langle u_i(t)u_j(t')\rangle = \frac{D_b}{\tau_b}\delta_{ij} e^{-|t-t'|/\tau_b}$, where $\tau_b$ is a finite memory time and $D_b = u_b^2\tau_b$ is the bath diffusivity. Extracting these parameters from experimental planar mean-square displacements via a 3D stochastic model, the paper reports $\tau_b$ between 0.1 and 0.6 s with no systematic dependence on bacterial density, tracer radius, or droplet radius, while $D_b$ increases with density and with the available space $R=R_o-R_i$. All measured $D_b$ values collapse over three decades when plotted against $nR/R_i$, indicating a linear dependence on bacterial concentration modulated by confinement. The paper therefore concludes that the active bath inside a droplet is characterized by a constant memory time and a confinement-tunable intensity.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the tracer feels a single uniform, Gaussian, exponentially correlated random push, so one correlation time and one noise strength describe the whole bath; if the bacterial forcing varies with position, depends on the wall, or has several timescales, the extracted $\tau_b$ and $D_b$ are effective fit parameters, not intrinsic properties.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • All confined-bath experiments collapse onto a single master curve $D_b \propto nR/R_i$, so one scaling relation organizes transport measurements across different droplet and tracer sizes.
  • Confinement is a tuning parameter: at fixed bacterial density, reducing the available space $R=R_o-R_i$ weakens the bath's diffusivity, so droplet size alone controls mixing intensity.
  • The bath memory time $\tau_b\approx 0.1$–$0.6$ s is independent of bacterial density, tracer size, and droplet size, meaning the short-time persistence of the active forcing is an intrinsic property of the swimmer–tracer interaction.
  • The effective friction coefficient extracted from the fits exceeds Stokes drag and grows with the confinement ratio $R_i/R_o$, independently of bacterial density, indicating wall lubrication rather than activity sets the tracer's resistance.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implication the paper leaves implicit: because $D_b$ grows with $R=R_o-R_i$, the same bacterial density produces a weaker bath in smaller droplets, so droplet-based bioreactors and emulsion mixers should exhibit a size-dependent stirring threshold that can be tested by measuring transport or reaction rates.
  • The constancy of $\tau_b$ hints that the memory is set by single-swimmer encounter kinematics (swim speed, body length) rather than by collective motion; a test would be to alter swimmer speed chemically and see $\tau_b$ change while $D_b$ keeps the $nR/R_i$ scaling.
  • The OUP is a coarse-grained effective description. Near the collective-motion density the linear law should saturate and the velocity increments should develop non-Gaussian tails; the flat-chamber $R\to\infty$ data already show where the collapse breaks down, so re-measuring at higher $nR/R_i$ would reveal the transition.
  • The combination $nR/R_i$ has the form of a density times available volume per tracer surface, suggesting a connection between $D_b$ and the mechanical swim pressure exerted on the confining interface; expressing $D_b$ as an active stress times a geometric factor would link bath diffusivity to droplet rheology.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies passive spherical tracers (solid beads or oil droplets) confined inside water droplets that contain swimming E. coli. From 2D and 3D particle tracking, the authors extract planar mean-square displacements and model the bacterial velocity field felt by the tracer as an isotropic Gaussian Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process with characteristic speed u_b and persistence time τ_b, while the spherical confinement is rendered as a reflective boundary. A numerical solution of this stochastic model is fitted to each experimental MSD using three free parameters (τ_b, u_b, and a sedimentation time τ_s), after a detection-noise correction. The reported results are that τ_b is roughly constant (0.1–0.6 s), u_b increases weakly with bacterial density, and the derived bath diffusivity D_b = u_b^2 τ_b collapses over about three decades when plotted against nR/R_i, where R is the available space between the tracer and the confining wall. The paper interprets this as evidence that a confined bacterial suspension acts as a colored-noise bath with a finite memory and a confinement-tunable intensity.

Significance. If the central empirical claim holds, the paper provides a useful quantitative characterization of confined active baths and a potentially general scaling relation involving bacterial density and geometric confinement. The work has several genuine strengths: it combines two experimental tracking platforms, includes a flat-chamber control system, explicitly corrects for detection noise rather than smoothing trajectories, verifies that trajectories reach the ergodic limit through the saturation plateau, and compares the fitted MSDs with a numerical model rather than relying on a harmonic approximation that the authors show is inapplicable to their data. These features make the study a solid experimental contribution to the active-bath literature. The main risk is in the inference chain from fitted parameters to the claimed three-decade collapse, because D_b is not measured directly but is constructed from fitted u_b and τ_b, and the manuscript does not yet demonstrate that this construction is robust and unique.

major comments (3)
  1. [Active bath diffusivity, Fig. 4] The central claim that D_b = u_b^2 τ_b collapses as a function of nR/R_i is not yet demonstrated convincingly, because D_b is a derived product of two fitted quantities and τ_b is only 'roughly constant' over a factor of about 6 (0.1 to 0.6 s). If τ_b is truly approximately independent of the control parameters, the same collapse should already be visible in u_b^2 (or u_b) plotted against nR/R_i. The manuscript does not show this plot, even though it does show u_b against n (Fig. 3b), where the data are highly scattered. Please report u_b and τ_b separately against nR/R_i, with confidence intervals, and quantify the residuals of the claimed power-law/collapse in D_b. Without this diagnostic, the collapse could in principle be manufactured by a systematic variation of the fitted τ_b or by parameter trade-offs in the three-parameter fit.
  2. [Bath parameters extraction and Methods F] No uncertainties, uniqueness checks, or identifiability tests are reported for the fitted parameters. The protocol scans about 40,000 simulations and selects the global minimum of χ^2, but the shape of the χ^2 landscape is not shown, so the reader cannot assess whether τ_b, u_b, and τ_s are independently constrained or whether a degenerate ridge exists. This is load-bearing because the main scaling law is built from fitted u_b and τ_b. Please provide confidence intervals (for example by bootstrapping over trajectories or over fit realizations), show the correlation structure among the fitted parameters, and demonstrate with synthetic MSD data generated from the model that the fitting procedure recovers the input parameters without systematic bias or degeneracy.
  3. [Numerical solution of a 3D stochastic model, Eq. (2)] The model assumes that the bacterial velocity felt by the tracer is spatially uniform, isotropic, Gaussian, and characterized by a single correlation time τ_b. This assumption is central to the definition of both τ_b and D_b, and the paper does not provide any direct validation of the Gaussian or single-timescale property, beyond the visual agreement of the fitted MSDs. I would like to see a concrete test: for example, a comparison of the experimental short-time velocity distribution (or an autocorrelation of the measured velocity increments) with the model prediction, or a statement of how strongly the extracted parameters and the nR/R_i scaling would change under an alternative noise model, such as one with two correlation times or non-Gaussian velocity statistics. This would clarify whether the extracted τ_b and D_b are intrinsic bath properties or merely effective outputs of the assumed model family.
minor comments (5)
  1. [References] Reference 18 appears to contain a typo: 'PNAS 1O7, 9541' should presumably read 'PNAS 107, 9541'.
  2. [Fig. 3] The caption states that the color bar is common to panels (c) and (d), but the figure as described in the text does not make clear which quantity the color represents; please state it explicitly in the caption.
  3. [Materials and Methods E] The detection-noise correction assumes strictly delta-correlated noise in Eq. (12). It would be useful to state explicitly that neighboring-frame noise correlations were checked to be negligible, since the correction offset in Eq. (11) would otherwise have a different i-dependence.
  4. [Particle velocities] In the sentence 'The harmonic model ... underestimates the particle bath reduction', the wording is ambiguous; it appears to mean that the harmonic model overestimates the ratio u_p/u_b. Please clarify to avoid misreading.
  5. [Conclusions] The conclusion states that τ_b shows no dependence on R_i or R_o, but the supporting evidence is only the text description in Fig. 3(a); a plot of τ_b against these control variables, or against nR/R_i, would make the statement directly verifiable.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: OUP parameters are fitted to independent MSD data, and the D_b collapse is a post-fit empirical scaling rather than a self-referential prediction.

full rationale

The claimed derivation chain is an explicitly adopted OUP model (Eqs. 1-2), numerical simulation, fitting of (tau_b, l_b, tau_s) to each measured MSD via the chi^2 in Eq. (13), and then computation of D_b = u_b^2 tau_b from the fitted parameters. Nothing in this chain predicts D_b from nR/R_i; the Fig. 4 collapse is an empirical statement about extracted D_b values plotted against an independently measured combination nR/R_i, and the paper explicitly reports that no collapse is obtained when D_b is plotted against density or confinement alone. The rejection of the harmonic model cites the authors' prior work [45], but the same limitation is supported by the present SI text and Fig. S2, and that prior result does not assume the D_b scaling, so it is not load-bearing circularity. The compatibility check against prior tracer and droplet measurements [8,11,50,51] is corroborative, not constitutive. The paper's caveat that the finding is still awaiting a complete theoretical explanation, and the lack of reported chi^2 landscape or parameter uncertainties, are robustness limitations rather than circular reasoning. No step reduces to its inputs by construction, so no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The stochastic extraction rests on assuming a single-timescale Gaussian OUP bath with a reflecting spherical boundary; all bath parameters are fitted, and the resulting Db is a derived quantity. No new physical entities are introduced, and the sedimentation timescale and detection noise are additional fitted or estimated inputs.

free parameters (4)
  • tau_b (bath persistence time) = 0.1 to 0.6 s
    Fitted per experimental MSD curve by matching simulations; central to defining the colored noise memory.
  • u_b (bath characteristic speed) = 0.5 to 12 um/s
    Fitted per experimental MSD curve; used to compute Db = u_b^2 tau_b.
  • tau_s (sedimentation time) = Not quoted individually; grows with beta R/(Delta rho R_i^2)
    Fitted per experimental MSD because Stokes drag is modified near the droplet wall and by concentration-dependent viscosity.
  • Detection noise sigma (position noise) = Not quoted
    Extracted from the short-time MSD offset 2 sigma^2 (Methods E); affects the ballistic speed estimate.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The active velocity u(t) is an isotropic Gaussian Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process with correlation <u_i(t)u_j(t')> = u_b^2 delta_ij exp(-|t-t'|/tau_b).
    Posited in Eq. (2); not derived from bacterial hydrodynamics.
  • domain assumption The tracer is overdamped and the active velocity is spatially uniform: dr/dt = u(t) - v_s zhat.
    Eq. (1) neglects position-dependent flow, Faxen corrections, and inertia.
  • domain assumption Spherical confinement is a perfectly reflecting boundary x^2+y^2+z^2 <= R^2.
    Used in the numerical integration; ignores deformable interface and near-wall lubrication hydrodynamics, with lubrication only absorbed into the fitted tau_s.
  • domain assumption Detection noise is zero-mean, Gaussian, and delta-correlated, independent of the tracer position.
    Methods E, Eq. (12); used to subtract the MSD offset.
  • standard math For ergodic stationary trajectories, the saturated MSD equals twice the position variance in each coordinate.
    Used in Fig. 2 to validate run length; standard relation for stationary confined processes.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Active bacterial baths in droplets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TJOTIHR4

@misc{pith2026250114088,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Active bacterial baths in droplets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TJOTIHR4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.14088}
}
read the original abstract

Suspensions of self-propelled objects represent a novel paradigm in colloidal science. In such active baths traditional concepts, such as Brownian motion, fluctuation-dissipation relations, and work extraction from heat reservoirs, must be extended beyond the conventional framework of thermal baths. Unlike thermal baths, which are characterized by a single parameter, the temperature, the fundamental descriptors of an active bath remain elusive, especially in confined environments. In this study, buoyant, passive tracers are employed as generalized probes to investigate an active bath comprising motile bacteria confined within a droplet. We demonstrate that momentum transfer from the bath to the tracer can be effectively described as colored noise, characterized by temporal memory and an enhanced effective diffusivity significantly larger compared to thermal Brownian motion values. Using a stochastic analytical framework, we extract the temporal memory and diffusivity parameters that define such an active bath. Notably, the diffusivity scales linearly with bacterial concentration, modulated by a factor representing the role of confinement, expressed as the ratio of the confining radius to the probe radius. This finding, while still awaiting a complete theoretical explanation, offers new insights into the transport properties of confined active baths and paves the way for a deeper understanding of active emulsions driven by confined active matter.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.14088 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) A schematic of a passive particle of radius Ri and density ϱp confined to a spherical bacterial droplet of radius Ro and density ϱb. The droplet is immersed in a fluid of density ϱo. (b) Parameter space of the experimental realizations. Markers of different shapes indicate the different setups. (c) Three-dimensional trajectory of a melamine particle of radius Ri = 2 µm confined within a droplet of radius Ro = 23… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Typical planar MSD curves for the planar coordinate ρ. The symbols represent the experimental data and the lines denote the best fitted MSD. The experimental parameters are: beads (x, y, z), Ro = 23 µm, Ri = 2 µm, n = 1.1 × 10−2 cells/µm3 ; beads (x, y), Ro = 15 µm, Ri = 2 µm, n = 4 × 10−2 cells/µm3 ; and double emulsion (x, y), Ro = 35 µm, Ri = 10 µm, n = 6.4 × 10−2 cells/µm3 . The dashed horizontal lines represent… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Times obtained by the fitting protocol for the bath (τb, open symbols) and sedimentation (τs, solid symbols) as a function of the τ St s = 2βπηwR/(∆ϱgR2 i ). The solid line indicates the prediction of the sedimentation time with the Stokes drag coefficient, τ St s . (b) Bath velocity ub, obtained by fitting the experimental MSD curves, as a function of the bacterial density n. (c) Experimentally obtained drag co… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Bath diffusivity Db = u 2 b τb as a function of nR/Ri. Symbols represent different experimental setups according to the legend in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Annalen der Physik 322, 549–560 (1905)

    A Einstein, ¨Uber die von der molekularkinetischen theorie der w¨arme geforderte bewegung von in ruhenden fl¨ussigkeiten suspendierten teilchen. Annalen der Physik 322, 549–560 (1905)

    work page 1905

  2. [2]

    XL Wu, A Libchaber, Particle diffusion in a quasi-two-dimensional bacterial bath. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3017–3020 (2000)

    work page 2000

  3. [3]

    Soft Matter 6, 4268 (2010)

    J Dunkel, VB Putz, IM Zaid, JM Y eomans, Swimmer-tracer scattering at low Reynolds number. Soft Matter 6, 4268 (2010)

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    JL Thiffeault, S Childress, Stirring by swimming bodies. Phys. Lett. A 374, 3487–3490 (2010)

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    GL Mi ˜no, J Dunstan, A Rousselet, E Cl´ement, R Soto, Induced diffusion of tracers in a bacterial suspension: theory and experiments. J. Fluid Mech. 729, 423–444 (2013)

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    DO Pushkin, JM Y eomans, Stirring by swimmers in confined microenvironments.J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp . 2014, P04030 (2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    Soft Matter 10, 2748–2758 (2014)

    A Morozov, D Marenduzzo, Enhanced diffusion of tracer particles in dilute bacterial suspensions. Soft Matter 10, 2748–2758 (2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    TV Kasyap, DL Koch, M Wu, Hydrodynamic tracer diffusion in suspensions of swimming bacteria. Phys. Fluids 26, 081901 (2014)

    work page 2014

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    EW Burkholder, JF Brady, Tracer diffusion in active suspensions. Phys. Rev. E 95, 052605 (2017)

    2017

  2. [10]

    AJTM Mathijssen, R Jeanneret, M Polin, Universal entrainment mechanism controls contact times with motile cells. Phys. Rev. Fluids 3, 033103 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    Soft Matter 16, 7503–7512 (2020)

    A Lagarde, et al., Colloidal transport in bacteria suspensions: from bacteria collision to anomalous and enhanced diffusion. Soft Matter 16, 7503–7512 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    MJ Kim, KS Breuer, Enhanced diffusion due to motile bacteria. Phys. Fluids 16, L78–L81 (2004)

    2004

  5. [13]

    KC Leptos, JS Guasto, JP Gollub, AI Pesci, RE Goldstein, Dynamics of enhanced tracer diffusion in suspensions of swimming eukaryotic microorganisms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 198103 (2009)

    2009

  6. [14]

    G Mino, et al., Enhanced diffusion due to active swimmers at a solid surface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 048102 (2011)

    2011

  7. [15]

    F Ginot, et al., Nonequilibrium equation of state in suspensions of active colloids. Phys. Rev. X 5, 011004 (2015)

    2015

  8. [16]

    P Galajda, J Keymer, P Chaikin, R Austin, A wall of funnels concentrates swimming bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 189, 8704 (2007)

    2007

  9. [17]

    PNAS 107, 969–974 (2010)

    A Sokolov, MM Apodaca, BA Grzybowski, I Aranson, Swimming bacteria power microscopic gears. PNAS 107, 969–974 (2010)

    2010

  10. [18]

    PNAS 1O7, 9541 (2010)

    R Di Leonardo, et al., Bacterial ratchet motors. PNAS 1O7, 9541 (2010)

    2010

  11. [19]

    C Dombrowski, L Cisneros, S Chatkaew, RE Goldstein, JO Kessler, Self-concentration and large-scale coherence in bacterial dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 098103 (2004)

    2004

  12. [20]

    J Bouvard, F Moisy, H Auradou, Ostwald-like ripening in the two-dimensional clustering of passive particles induced by swimming bacteria. Phys. Rev. E 107, 044607 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    AP Petroff, XL Wu, A Libchaber, Fast-moving bacteria self-organize into active two-dimensional crystals of rotating cells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 158102 (2015)

    2015

  14. [22]

    Reports on progress physics 75, 126001 (2012)

    U Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation theorems and molecular machines. Reports on progress physics 75, 126001 (2012)

    2012

  15. [23]

    J O’Byrne, Y Kafri, J Tailleur, F van Wijland, Time irreversibility in active matter, from micro to macro. Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 167–183 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    SC Takatori, W Y an, JF Brady, Swim pressure: Stress generation in active matter.Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 028103 (2014)

    2014

  17. [25]

    F Smallenburg, H L¨owen, Swim pressure on walls with curves and corners. Phys. Rev. E 92, 032304 (2015)

    2015

  18. [26]

    N Nikola, et al., Active particles with soft and curved walls: Equation of state, ratchets, and instabilities. Phys. review letters 117, 098001 (2016)

    2016

  19. [27]

    AP Berke, L Turner, HC Berg, E Lauga, Hydrodynamic attraction of swimming microorganisms by surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 038102 (2008)

    2008

  20. [28]

    C Maggi, et al., Generalized energy equipartition in harmonic oscillators driven by active baths. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 238303 (2014)

    2014

  21. [29]

    C Maggi, M Paoluzzi, L Angelani, R Di Leonardo, Memory-less response and violation of the fluctuation-dissipation theorem in colloids suspended in an active bath. Sci. Rep. 7, 17588 (2017)

    2017

  22. [30]

    S Chaki, R Chakrabarti, Entropy production and work fluctuation relations for a single particle in active bath. Phys. A 511, 302–315 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    Soft Matter 16, 4655–4660 (2020)

    S Y e, P Liu, F Y e, K Chen, M Y ang, Active noise experienced by a passive particle trapped in an active bath. Soft Matter 16, 4655–4660 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    L Dabelow, S Bo, R Eichhorn, Irreversibility in active matter systems: Fluctuation theorem and mutual information. Phys. Rev. X 9, 021009 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    Lab Chip 16, 2168 (2016)

    TS Kaminski, O Scheler, P Garstecki, Droplet microfluidics for microbiology: techniques, applications and challenges. Lab Chip 16, 2168 (2016)

    2016

  26. [34]

    A Pryszlak, et al., Enrichment of gut microbiome strains for cultivation-free genome sequencing using droplet microfluidics. Cell. Rep. Methods 2, 100137 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    W Postek, P Garstecki, Droplet microfluidics for high-throughput analysis of antibiotic susceptibility in bacterial cells and populations. Acc. Chem. Res. 55 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Science 319, 1214 (2008)

    BC Christner, CE Morris, CM Foreman, R Cai, DC Sands, Ubiquity of biological ice nucleators in snowfall. Science 319, 1214 (2008)

    2008

  29. [37]

    PLoS ONE 5, e10046 (2010)

    D Robert, TH Nguyen, F Gallet, C Wilhelm, In vivo determination of fluctuating forces during endosome trafficking using a combination of active and passive microrheology. PLoS ONE 5, e10046 (2010)

    2010

  30. [38]

    K Norregaard, R Metzler, CM Ritter, K Berg-Sørensen, LB Oddershede, Manipulation and motion of organelles and single molecules in living cells. Chem. Rev. 117, 4342–4375 (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    C Alfano, et al., Molecular crowding: The history and development of a scientific paradigm. Chem. Rev. 124, 3186–3219 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    T Darnige, N Figueroa-Morales, P Bohec, A Lindner, E Cl ´ement, Lagrangian 3D tracking of fluorescent microscopic objects in motion. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 88, 055106 (2017)

    2017

  33. [41]

    A Billon, Y Forterre, O Pouliquen, O Dauchot, Transition from granular to brownian suspension: An inclined plane experiment. Phys. Rev. Fluids 8, 034302 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    A Th ´ery, A Chamolly, E Lauga, Controlling confined collective organization with taxis. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 10830 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    B Vincenti, et al., Magnetotactic bacteria in a droplet self-assemble into a rotary motor. Nat. Commun. 10 (2019)

    2019

  36. [44]

    DS Martin, MB Forstner, JA K ¨as, Apparent subdiffusion inherent to single particle tracking. Biophys. J. 83, 2109–2117 (2002)

    2002

  37. [45]

    C Villalobos, ML Cordero, E Cl´ement, R Soto, Recovering the activity parameters of an active fluid confined in a sphere. Phys. Rev. E 110, 014610 (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    G Volpe, S Gigan, G Volpe, Simulation of the active Brownian motion of a microswimmer. Am. J. Phys. 82, 659–664 (2014)

    2014

  39. [47]

    JM Rallison, Note on the Fax ´en relations for a particle in stokes flow. J. Fluid Mech. 88, 529–533 (1978)

    1978

  40. [48]

    (Springer Science & Business Media), (1983)

    J Happel, H Brenner, Low Reynolds number hydrodynamics: with special applications to particulate media. (Springer Science & Business Media), (1983)

    1983

  41. [49]

    HM L ´opez, J Gachelin, C Douarche, H Auradou, E Cl´ement, Turning bacteria suspensions into superfluids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 028301 (2015)

    2015

  42. [50]

    Soft matter 12, 2365–2372 (2016)

    AE Patteson, A Gopinath, PK Purohit, PE Arratia, Particle diffusion in active fluids is non-monotonic in size. Soft matter 12, 2365–2372 (2016)

    2016

  43. [51]

    Soft Matter 16, 1359–1365 (2020)

    G Ramos, ML Cordero, R Soto, Bacteria driving droplets. Soft Matter 16, 1359–1365 (2020)

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.