Probing $k$-Space Alternating Spin Polarization via the Anomalous Hall Effect

Bin Zhou; Dong-Hui Xu; Hai-Peng Sun; Rui Chen; Zi-Ming Wang

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Probing $k$-Space Alternating Spin Polarization via the Anomalous Hall Effect

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A topological insulator surface can map an altermagnet's k-space spin polarization by converting the local magnetic moment into a Dirac mass, read out through the anomalous Hall effect.

desk verdict A clean, fully in-model proposal for reading an altermagnet's k-space spin texture via a TI surface Hall probe; the interface transferability assumption is real but not fatal for a theory paper. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.14217 v1 pith:KTZJAJTR submitted 2025-01-24 cond-mat.mes-hall

Rui Chen , Zi-Ming Wang , Hai-Peng Sun , Bin Zhou , Dong-Hui Xu This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mes-hall PACS 73.43.-f75.70.Tj

keywords altermagnettopologicalinsulatoranomalousHalleffectDiracmassk-spacespinpolarizationproximityd-wavehalf-quantizedconductance

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

An altermagnet pressed against a topological insulator turns the surface's massless Dirac fermion into a point-by-point probe of the altermagnet's momentum-space spin polarization. The paper shows that the Dirac mass picked up at the shifted Dirac point equals the altermagnet form factor J(k0x, k0y) at that momentum, and that the resulting anomalous Hall conductance carries both the sign and the magnitude of this local magnetic moment. Because an in-plane magnetic field moves the Dirac point through k-space, sweeping field strength and direction maps the global distribution J(kx, ky). If the scheme works in real materials, it would give a transport-based, direct readout of the k-space spin density that defines altermagnets.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the massive surface Dirac fermion of a topological insulator used as a local k-space magnetometer. The controlling identity is that the Dirac mass at the shifted Dirac point equals the altermagnet form factor, m = J(k0x, k0y), with the shift (k0x, k0y) = ($\Delta$ cos phi/A2, $\Delta$ sin phi/A2) dialed by the in-plane magnetic field; the half-quantized anomalous Hall conductance then reports the sign of m and the plateau width or sub-gap Hall value reports its magnitude. The symmetry of the form factor shows up as the angular period of the Hall response and the power law in $\Delta$, which is what lets different altermagnet symmetries be told apart.

What would settle it

A clean test is to fabricate a topological insulator slab on a nominally d-wave altermagnet, rotate an in-plane magnetic field at fixed magnitude, and measure the Hall conductance: the paper predicts a pi-periodic pattern in the field angle with sign flips at phi = pi/4 and magnitude scaling as $\Delta$^2; observing a 2pi/3-periodic pattern or a $\Delta$^3 scaling would falsify the direct mapping.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At the heart of the paper is Eq. (2): after integrating out the film thickness, the surface states of the TI/altermagnet heterostructure are described by H' = A2[(kx - k0x) sigma_x + (ky - k0y) sigma_y] + J(kx, ky) sigma_z, with (k0x, k0y) = ($\Delta$ cos phi/A2, $\Delta$ sin phi/A2) set by the in-plane exchange field. The Dirac point sits at the shifted momentum, and the Dirac mass there is exactly J(k0x, k0y). Eq. (3) then gives sigma_xy = -$e^{2}$ sign[J(k0x,k0y)]/2h when the Fermi energy lies in the gap, and a value proportional to J(k0x,k0y)/(2h |EF|) when it crosses the bands, so the Hall conductance directly measures the local k-space magnetic moment and sweeping the in-plane field maps the full J(kx, ky) texture. For a d-wave altermagnet the Hall map is pi-periodic in the field angle and grows as $\Delta$^2; for g-wave and i-wave altermagnets the period and scaling become pi/2 and $\Delta$^4, and pi/3 and $\Delta$^6, respectively. Numerical tight-binding calculations confirm the half-quantized plateau, show the pattern is robust to disorder until W ~ 0.4 eV, and show realistic hexagonal warping ($\lambda$ ~ 0.25 eV $nm^{3}$) barely distorts the altermagnet-dominated signal.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the proximity effect from the altermagnet couples to the TI surface exactly through the term F(z)J(kx,ky)sigma_z, so the bulk momentum-space form factor transfers unchanged to the interface; if interface hybridization, lattice mismatch, orbital mixing, or the altermagnet's own spin-orbit coupling renormalizes or adds momentum-dependent terms, the measured Hall pattern would no longer equal the bulk k-space spin polarization.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A single Hall measurement at fixed Delta and phi reads the sign and magnitude of the altermagnet's k-space magnetic moment at one Dirac point.
Sweeping the in-plane field maps the global J(kx, ky) distribution, effectively imaging the k-space spin density of the altermagnet.
The pi, pi/2, and pi/3 angular periods for d-, g-, and i-wave altermagnets, together with their Delta^2, Delta^4, and Delta^6 scaling, give a fingerprint for identifying the magnetic symmetry in transport.
The scheme extends from altermagnets to other unconventional antiferromagnets and complex magnetic textures, as the same shifted-Dirac-point logic applies.
Disorder robustness up to about 0.4 eV and the smallness of hexagonal warping at realistic coupling make the predicted signature experimentally accessible.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The scheme's clean mapping assumes the proximity-induced exchange on the TI surface is exactly F(z) J(kx,ky) sigma_z; if interface hybridization, orbital mixing, or the altermagnet's own spin-orbit coupling add terms beyond sigma_z, the measured Hall map would be a distorted version of the bulk form factor. A side-by-side comparison with spin-resolved photoemission on the same heterostructure woul
Because the sign and magnitude of J enter different observables (plateau sign vs plateau width/sub-gap value), gating the Fermi energy could provide an internal consistency check that the signal really is the Dirac mass, rather than a bulk or interface artifact.
Applied to candidate altermagnets such as Mn5Si3, the predicted angular period and Delta-scaling of the Hall conductance give a sharp, falsifiable signature that could be tested with rotating in-plane fields.
One could also read the scheme backwards: with a known altermagnet form factor, the Hall map calibrates the relation between applied in-plane field and Dirac-point shift, effectively providing a magnetometry of the TI surface itself.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Two things you should know. First, this is a genuinely new protocol: instead of trying to detect altermagnetic splitting directly, the authors use an in-plane field to shift the TI surface Dirac point in k-space and read off the altermagnet form factor J(kx,ky) at that point from the half-quantized Hall conductance. Sweeping the field maps the full distribution. That combination is not in the cited literature. Second, the central result is sound inside the model. The effective surface Hamiltonian, the mass term J(k0x,k0y)σz, and the half-quantized Hall formula all follow from standard TI surface theory, and the tight-binding and Landauer-Büttiker numerics back the qualitative mapping, including disorder robustness.

The paper also does a few things well. The angular-period fingerprints for d-, g-, and i-wave altermagnets (π, π/2, π/3) and the power-law scalings with field (∆², ∆⁴, ∆⁶) are concrete, falsifiable predictions that an experiment could test. The hexagonal-warping analysis is honest: for realistic λ and moderate ∆, the altermagnetic term dominates, and only at λ ~ 2 eV does the 2π/3 period appear. The disorder study with 1000 samples is reasonable for a Letter.

The soft spots are proportionate. The main one is the one you'd guess: the proximity term is written as HJ = F(z)J(kx,ky)σzτ0, i.e., the bulk altermagnetic form factor is assumed to transfer unchanged to the TI surface. That is load-bearing for the whole method, and the paper neither derives it from a microscopic interface model nor flags it as a limitation. If lattice mismatch, orbital mixing, or interfacial spin-orbit coupling renormalizes J or adds terms like a Rashba field, the measured Hall pattern may not equal the bulk k-space spin density. That said, this is a theory proposal, and the model is internally consistent; the caveat is for experimental realization, not a contradiction in the paper. Two smaller issues: the derivation of Eq. (2) is relegated to a supplemental section, so a referee cannot check the central reduction from the Letter alone, and no code or data are shipped. Also, Table I writes the i-wave mass term with Jd instead of Ji—a typo, but confusing given the paper's own notation.

Who is this for: anyone working on altermagnet detection, magnetic TI heterostructures, or anomalous Hall probes of magnetic texture. It deserves a serious referee. The right revision would add a microscopic justification or an explicit limitation paragraph, fix the typo, and ideally make the supplement self-contained.

Recommendation: send to peer review. The core idea is new and the in-model case is solid.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a detection scheme for the k-space spin polarization of altermagnets by measuring the anomalous Hall effect in a topological insulator (TI) slab proximitized by an altermagnet. The central idea is that the proximity-induced exchange term HJ = F(z)J(kx,ky)σzτ0 gives the TI surface Dirac fermion a mass equal to J(k0x,k0y), where (k0x,k0y) is the Dirac point shifted by an in-plane field. A half-quantized Hall conductance plateau then encodes the sign and magnitude of J at that momentum, and sweeping the in-plane field maps J(kx,ky). The authors support this mapping with tight-binding and Landauer-Büttiker calculations, and show that the angular period and power-law dependence of σxy on Δ distinguish d-, g-, and i-wave altermagnets. The influence of hexagonal warping and disorder is also analyzed.

Significance. If the central mapping holds, the proposal is a practical and falsifiable route to detecting altermagnetic order: it yields distinct predictions (π, π/2, π/3 angular periods; σxy ∝ Δ^2, Δ^4, Δ^6) and requires only standard transport measurements. The numerical tight-binding and Landauer-Büttiker calculations provide concrete support for the qualitative mapping and for its robustness to disorder up to W ≈ 0.4 eV, and the warping analysis addresses a realistic complication for Bi2Se3-class surfaces. The paper gives a clear, parameter-light protocol and identifies experimentally distinguishable fingerprints, which are significant strengths. The main open point is the interface assumption discussed below.

major comments (1)

[Model, Eq. (1), HJ term] The central mapping σxy(Δ,φ) = −(e²/2h) sign[J(k0x,k0y)] (Eqs. (2)-(3)) assumes that the proximity-induced exchange coupling on the TI surface is exactly F(z)J(kx,ky)σzτ0, with the bulk altermagnetic form factor transferred unchanged to the interface. The paper does not derive this coupling from a microscopic interface model, nor does it discuss how interface hybridization, lattice mismatch, orbital mixing, or the altermagnet's own spin-orbit coupling could renormalize J(k) or generate additional momentum-dependent terms such as a k-independent exchange offset or a Rashba-type spin-orbit field. Because the proposal is explicitly presented as a direct measurement of the bulk k-space spin density, this transferability assumption is load-bearing. The authors should either provide a microscopic justification for why the bulk form factor survives at the interface, or explicitly state that the measured quantity is the interface form factor and identify the conditions under which it equals the bulk J(k).

minor comments (4)

[Page 3, after Eq. (4)] The sentence 'For ϕ = π/2, we have σxy = −e2/2h because the Dirac cone shifts to the ky-direction [Fig. 1(c)], acquiring an opposite mass compared to the case with ϕ = π/2' should compare with the case ϕ = 0, not ϕ = π/2.
[Table I] In the i-wave row, the Dirac mass expression is written as Δ^6 Jd sin 6ϕ / (2A2^6); the prefactor should be Ji to match the definition J(kx,ky) = Ji kx ky (3kx² − ky²)(kx² − 3ky²).
[Figures 2-5] The axis label rendered as 'σxφ (φ2/τ)' should read σxy (e²/h) consistently; the same notation appears in several figure panels and should be corrected.
[Introduction] The phrase 'we propose to a method' should be 'we propose a method'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the Hall-conductance mapping is derived from the stated model, not fitted or defined into existence.

full rationale

The paper's central relation, sigma_xy approximately (e^2/2h) sign[J(k0x,k0y)] in the gapped regime, follows from deriving the effective surface Hamiltonian (Eq. 2) from the stated bulk-plus-proximity model (Eq. 1) and evaluating the Dirac mass at the field-shifted Dirac point. The quantity J(kx,ky) is an explicit input of the model Hamiltonian, and the paper proposes that measuring the Hall conductance can extract this input; this is a conditional prediction of the model mapping, not a fit disguised as a prediction, nor a redefinition of the target quantity. The susceptibility of the interface proximity term to real-material renormalization is a physical assumption and a falsifiability risk, not a circularity, because the paper states the ansatz explicitly rather than importing it through a self-citation or uniqueness theorem. The numerical tight-binding, disorder, and hexagonal-warping checks are independent evaluations of the same model, and the references to prior work are standard external sources. No load-bearing self-citations or imported uniqueness theorems appear. Accordingly, the derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests mainly on a phenomenological interface model rather than on fitted parameters. The listed free parameters are illustrative coupling constants for the altermagnetic form factors. The load-bearing assumptions are that the altermagnetic form factor transfers unchanged to the TI interface, that the in-plane field only shifts the Dirac point, and that the standard half-quantized Hall response applies. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are postulated.

free parameters (3)

Jd = 0.566 eV nm^2 (set equal to B2)
The d-wave altermagnet coupling is chosen to be of the same order as the k^2 term in the Bi2Se3 model rather than fitted to experimental data. It controls the size of the Dirac mass and the width of the half-quantized Hall plateau, but not the qualitative mapping.
Jg = 0.5 eV nm^4
The g-wave altermagnet coupling is chosen for the illustrative calculation in Figure 5 and Table I. It is a model input, not a measured or fitted constant.
Ji = 0.5 eV nm^6
The i-wave altermagnet coupling is chosen for the illustrative calculation in Figure 5 and Table I. It is a model input, not a measured or fitted constant.

assumptions (4)

ad hoc to paper The proximity-induced altermagnetic exchange on the TI surface enters as F(z)J(kx,ky)sigma_z tau_0, with the bulk altermagnetic form factor transferred unchanged to the interface.
This is the central modeling input and is not derived from a microscopic interface theory. The entire measurement protocol depends on this form factor surviving the interface.
domain assumption The in-plane magnetic field acts only as a Zeeman shift Delta(cos phi sigma_x + sin phi sigma_y) tau_0 on the TI surface, shifting the Dirac point to k0 = Delta(cos phi, sin phi)/A2.
This is a standard model for in-plane magnetization in topological insulators, adapted from the cited Liu, Hsu, and Liu work. It also assumes the field does not disturb the altermagnet, justified by the high saturation fields quoted for RuO2 and MnTe.
domain assumption The surface states of the TI slab are described by the effective Dirac Hamiltonian in Eq. (2), with open boundary conditions and no additional top-bottom surface coupling beyond the model.
The derivation is delegated to the supplemental material. The assumption that the low-energy physics is a single massless Dirac cone on each surface is standard for thick TI slabs.
standard math The Hall conductance of a gapped Dirac surface is half-quantized when the Fermi energy lies in the gap, as expressed in Eq. (3).
This is the well-established half-quantized Hall response of a single massive Dirac surface, previously observed in semi-magnetic topological insulators.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Probing $k$-Space Alternating Spin Polarization via the Anomalous Hall Effect." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KTZJAJTR

@misc{pith2026250114217,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Probing $k$-Space Alternating Spin Polarization via the Anomalous Hall Effect},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KTZJAJTR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.14217}
}

abstract

Altermagnets represent a recently discovered class of collinear magnets, characterized by antiparallel neighboring magnetic moments and alternating-sign spin polarization in momentum-space($k$-space). However, experimental methods for probing the $k$-space spin polarization in altermagnets remain limited. In this work, we propose an approach to address this challenge by interfacing an altermagnet with the surface of a topological insulator. The massless Dirac fermions on the topological insulator surface acquire a mass due to the time-reversal symmetry breaking. The local $k$-space magnetic moment at the Dirac point directly determines both the sign and magnitude of this Dirac mass, resulting in an anomalous Hall effect. By measuring the Hall conductance, we can extract the local $k$-space magnetic moment. Moreover, we can map the global magnetic moment distribution by tuning the Dirac point position using an in-plane magnetic field, thereby revealing the $k$-space spin density of the altermagnet. This work establishes the Dirac fermion on the topological insulator surface as a sensitive probe for unveiling spin characters of altermagnets and those of other unconventional antiferromagnets.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.14217 by the authors.

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. Numerically calculated Hall conductance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** FIG. 5. Numerically calculated Hall conductance as functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a)-(d) Hall conductance as functions of ∆ and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Interplay of Altermagnetic Order and Wilson Mass in the Dirac Equation: Helical Edge States without Time-Reversal Symmetry
cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Altermagnetic order in 3D topological insulator thin films produces helical edge states with zero total Chern number, protected by crystalline and magnetic symmetry, with measurable quantized nonlocal resistance plateaus.
Topological surface altermagnets in SSH-stacked magnetic layers
cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Stacking altermagnetic layers in an SSH chain leaves a compensated antiferromagnet in bulk and spin-split topologically protected states at the surface.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[1]

Beyond con- ventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation sym- metry

L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, “Beyond con- ventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation sym- metry”, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

work page 2022
[2]

Altermagnetism: Exploring new frontiers in magnetism and spintronics

L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. ˇSmejkal, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, “Altermagnetism: Exploring new frontiers in magnetism and spintronics”, Adv. Funct. Mater. , 2409327 (2024)

2024
[3]

Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets

L. ˇSmejkal, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, “Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets”, Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8809 (2020)

work page 2020
[4]

Spin current generation in organic antiferromagnets

M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Yanagi, Y. Mo- tome, and H. Seo, “Spin current generation in organic antiferromagnets”, Nat. Commun. 10, 4305 (2019)

work page 2019
[5]

Anti- ferromagnetism in RuO 2 as d-wave Pomeranchuk insta- bility

K.-H. Ahn, A. Hariki, K.-W. Lee, and J. Kuneˇ s, “Anti- ferromagnetism in RuO 2 as d-wave Pomeranchuk insta- bility”, Phys. Rev. B 99, 184432 (2019)

work page 2019
[6]

Momentum- dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering

S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, “Momentum- dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering”, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 88, 123702 (2019)

work page 2019
[7]

Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-z antiferromagnets

L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, “Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-z antiferromagnets”, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014422 (2020)

work page 2020
[8]

Prediction of unconven- tional magnetism in doped FeSb2

I. I. Mazin, K. Koepernik, M. D. Johannes, R. Gonz´ alez- Hern´ andez, and L. ˇSmejkal, “Prediction of unconven- tional magnetism in doped FeSb2”, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 118, e2108924118 (2021)

2021

Show all 54 references

[9]

Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materi- als with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin cur- rent

H.-Y. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, “Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materi- als with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin cur- rent”, Nat. Commun. 12, 2846 (2021)

2021
[10]

Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism

L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, “Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism”, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022)

2022
[11]

Altermagnetic lifting of kramers spin degeneracy

J. Krempask` y, L. ˇSmejkal, S. D’souza, M. Hajlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhl ´ ıˇ rov´ a,et al., “Altermagnetic lifting of kramers spin degeneracy”, Nature 626, 517 (2024)

2024
[12]

Spectroscopic evidence of spin-state excitation in d-electron correlated semiconductor FeSb 2

H. Li, G. Wang, N. Ding, Q. Ren, G. Zhao, W. Lin, et al., “Spectroscopic evidence of spin-state excitation in d-electron correlated semiconductor FeSb 2”, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 121, e2321193121 (2024)

2024
[13]

Perovskite as a spin current generator

M. Naka, Y. Motome, and H. Seo, “Perovskite as a spin current generator”, Phys. Rev. B 103, 125114 (2021)

2021
[14]

Spin-neutral currents for spintronics

D.-F. Shao, S.-H. Zhang, M. Li, C.-B. Eom, and E. Y. Tsymbal, “Spin-neutral currents for spintronics”, Nat. Commun. 12, 7061 (2021)

2021
[15]

An anomalous Hall effect in altermagnetic ruthe- nium dioxide

Z. Feng, X. Zhou, L. ˇSmejkal, L. Wu, Z. Zhu, H. Guo, et al., “An anomalous Hall effect in altermagnetic ruthe- nium dioxide”, Nat. Electron. 5, 735 (2022)

2022
[16]

Giant and tunneling magnetoresistance in unconventional collinear antiferro- magnets with nonrelativistic spin-momentum coupling

L. ˇSmejkal, A. B. Hellenes, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, “Giant and tunneling magnetoresistance in unconventional collinear antiferro- magnets with nonrelativistic spin-momentum coupling”, Phys. Rev. X 12, 011028 (2022)

2022
[17]

Topological transition from nodal to nodeless zeeman splitting in altermagnets

R. M. Fernandes, V. S. de Carvalho, T. Birol, and R. G. Pereira, “Topological transition from nodal to nodeless zeeman splitting in altermagnets”, Phys. Rev. B 109, 024404 (2024)

2024
[18]

Predictable gate-field control of spin in al- termagnets with spin-layer coupling

R.-W. Zhang, C. Cui, R. Li, J. Duan, L. Li, Z.-M. Yu, and Y. Yao, “Predictable gate-field control of spin in al- termagnets with spin-layer coupling”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 056401 (2024)

2024
[19]

Absence of magnetic order in RuO2: insights from µSR spectroscopy and neu- tron diffraction

P. Keßler, L. Garcia-Gassull, A. Suter, T. Prokscha, Z. Salman, D. Khalyavin, et al., “Absence of magnetic order in RuO2: insights from µSR spectroscopy and neu- tron diffraction”, npj Spintronics 2, 50 (2024)

2024
[20]

An anomalous Hall effect in altermagnetic ruthe- nium dioxide

Z. Feng, X. Zhou, L. Smejkal, L. Wu, Z. Zhu, H. Guo, et al., “An anomalous Hall effect in altermagnetic ruthe- nium dioxide”, Nat. Elec. 5, 735 (2022)

2022
[21]

Crystal Thermal Transport in Altermagnetic RuO 2

X. Zhou, W. Feng, R.-W. Zhang, L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, “Crystal Thermal Transport in Altermagnetic RuO 2”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 056701 (2024)

2024
[22]

Observation of Spin-Splitter Torque in Collinear Antiferromagnetic RuO 2

S. Karube, T. Tanaka, D. Sugawara, N. Kadoguchi, M. Kohda, and J. Nitta, “Observation of Spin-Splitter Torque in Collinear Antiferromagnetic RuO 2”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 137201 (2022)

2022
[23]

Observation of time- reversal symmetry breaking in the band structure of al- termagnetic RuO2

O. Fedchenko, J. Minar, A. Akashdeep, S. W. DSouza, D. Vasilyev, O. Tkach, et al., “Observation of time- reversal symmetry breaking in the band structure of al- termagnetic RuO2”, Sci. Adv. 10, eadj4883 (2024)

2024
[24]

Nonmagnetic Ground State in RuO2 Revealed by Muon Spin Rotation

M. Hiraishi, H. Okabe, A. Koda, R. Kadono, T. Muroi, 6 D. Hirai, and Z. Hiroi, “Nonmagnetic Ground State in RuO2 Revealed by Muon Spin Rotation”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 166702 (2024)

2024
[25]

Absence of altermagnetic spin splitting character in ru- tile oxide RuO 2

J. Liu, J. Zhan, T. Li, J. Liu, S. Cheng, Y. Shi, et al., “Absence of altermagnetic spin splitting character in ru- tile oxide RuO 2”, arXiv:2409.13504 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[26]

RuO 2: a puzzle to be solved

A. Smolyanyuk, I. I. Mazin, L. Garcia-Gassull, and R. Valent ´ ı, “RuO 2: a puzzle to be solved”, arXiv:2310.06909 (2023)

2023 arXiv
[27]

Experimental observation of the quantum anoma- lous Hall effect in a magnetic topological insulator

C. Chang, J. Zhang, X. Feng, J. Shen, Z. Zhang, M. Guo, et al., “Experimental observation of the quantum anoma- lous Hall effect in a magnetic topological insulator”, Sci- ence 340, 167 (2013)

2013
[28]

Quantum anomalous Hall effect in intrinsic magnetic topological insulator MnBi 2Te4

Y. Deng, Y. Yu, M. Z. Shi, Z. Guo, Z. Xu, J. Wang, X. H. Chen, and Y. Zhang, “Quantum anomalous Hall effect in intrinsic magnetic topological insulator MnBi 2Te4”, Science 367, 895 (2020)

2020
[29]

A magnetic heterostructure of topologi- cal insulators as a candidate for an axion insulator

M. Mogi, M. Kawamura, R. Yoshimi, A. Tsukazaki, Y. Kozuka, N. Shirakawa, K. S. Takahashi, M. Kawasaki, and Y. Tokura, “A magnetic heterostructure of topologi- cal insulators as a candidate for an axion insulator”, Nat. Mater. 16, 516 (2017)

2017
[30]

Robust axion insulator and Chern insulator phases in a two-dimensional antifer- romagnetic topological insulator

C. Liu, Y. Wang, H. Li, Y. Wu, Y. Li, J. Li, K. He, Y. Xu, J. Zhang, and Y. Wang, “Robust axion insulator and Chern insulator phases in a two-dimensional antifer- romagnetic topological insulator”, Nat. Mater. 19, 522 (2020)

2020
[31]

Experimental signature of the parity anomaly in a semi-magnetic topological insulator

M. Mogi, Y. Okamura, M. Kawamura, R. Yoshimi, K. Ya- suda, A. Tsukazaki, et al., “Experimental signature of the parity anomaly in a semi-magnetic topological insulator”, Nat. Phys. 18, 390 (2022)

2022
[32]

Magnetic topological insulators

Y. Tokura, K. Yasuda, and A. Tsukazaki, “Magnetic topological insulators”, Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 126 (2019)

2019
[33]

Marriage of topology and magnetism

C.-Z. Chang, “Marriage of topology and magnetism”, Nat. Mater. 19, 484–485 (2020)

2020
[34]

Recent progress of transport theory in Dirac quantum materials

H.-W. Wang, B. Fu, and S.-Q. Shen, “Recent progress of transport theory in Dirac quantum materials”, Acta Phys. Sin-ch. Ed. 72, 177303 (2023)

2023
[35]

Topological insu- lators in three dimensions

L. Fu, C. L. Kane, and E. J. Mele, “Topological insu- lators in three dimensions”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 106803 (2007)

2007
[36]

Colloquium: Topological insulators

M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, “Colloquium: Topological insulators”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010)

2010
[37]

Model Hamiltonian for topological insula- tors

C.-X. Liu, X.-L. Qi, H. J. Zhang, X. Dai, Z. Fang, and S.-C. Zhang, “Model Hamiltonian for topological insula- tors”, Phys. Rev. B 82, 045122 (2010)

2010
[38]

Topological insulators in Bi 2Se3, Bi2Te3 and Sb2Te3 with a single Dirac cone on the surface

H. Zhang, C.-X. Liu, X.-L. Qi, X. Dai, Z. Fang, and S.- C. Zhang, “Topological insulators in Bi 2Se3, Bi2Te3 and Sb2Te3 with a single Dirac cone on the surface”, Nature Phys. 5, 438 (2009)

2009
[39]

In-plane magnetization-induced quantum anomalous Hall effect

X. Liu, H.-C. Hsu, and C.-X. Liu, “In-plane magnetization-induced quantum anomalous Hall effect”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 086802 (2013)

2013
[40]

Quantized anomalous Hall effect in magnetic topological insulators

R. Yu, W. Zhang, H.-J. Zhang, S.-C. Zhang, X. Dai, and Z. Fang, “Quantized anomalous Hall effect in magnetic topological insulators”, Science 329, 61 (2010)

2010
[41]

Giant anisotropic magnetoresistance in a quantum anomalous Hall insulator

A. Kandala, A. Richardella, S. Kempinger, C.-X. Liu, and N. Samarth, “Giant anisotropic magnetoresistance in a quantum anomalous Hall insulator”, Nat. Commun. 6, 7434 (2015)

2015
[42]

Saturation of the anomalous hall effect at high magnetic fields in altermagnetic ruo2

T. Tschirner, P. Keßler, R. D. Gonzalez Betancourt, T. Kotte, D. Kriegner, B. B¨ uchner, et al., “Saturation of the anomalous hall effect at high magnetic fields in altermagnetic ruo2”, APL Mater. 11, 101103 (2023)

2023
[43]

Spontaneous anomalous hall effect arising from an unconventional compensated magnetic phase in a semi- conductor

R. D. Gonzalez Betancourt, J. Zub´ aˇ c, R. Gonzalez- Hernandez, K. Geishendorf, Z. ˇSob´ aˇ n, G. Springholz, et al., “Spontaneous anomalous hall effect arising from an unconventional compensated magnetic phase in a semi- conductor”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 036702 (2023)

2023
[44]

See Supplemental Material for more details
[45]

Shen, Topological Insulators–Dirac Equation in Condensed Matter (Springer Singapore, 2017)

S.-Q. Shen, Topological Insulators–Dirac Equation in Condensed Matter (Springer Singapore, 2017)

2017
[46]

Topological insulators and superconductors

X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, “Topological insulators and superconductors”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011)

2011
[47]

Quantum anomalous semimetals

B. Fu, J.-Y. Zou, Z.-A. Hu, H.-W. Wang, and S.-Q. Shen, “Quantum anomalous semimetals”, npj Quantum Materials 7, 94 (2022)

2022
[48]

Electrical resistance of disordered one- dimensional lattices

R. Landauer, “Electrical resistance of disordered one- dimensional lattices”, Philos. Mag. 21, 863 (1970)

1970
[49]

Absence of backscattering in the quantum Hall effect in multiprobe conductors

M. B¨ uttiker, “Absence of backscattering in the quantum Hall effect in multiprobe conductors”, Phys. Rev. B 38, 9375 (1988)

1988
[50]

Relation between conduc- tivity and transmission matrix

D. S. Fisher and P. A. Lee, “Relation between conduc- tivity and transmission matrix”, Phys. Rev. B 23, 6851 (1981)

1981
[51]

The calculation of transport properties and density of states of disordered solids

A. MacKinnon, “The calculation of transport properties and density of states of disordered solids”, Z. Phys. B 59, 385 (1985)

1985
[52]

Green’s function technique for studying electron flow in two-dimensional mesoscopic samples

G. Metalidis and P. Bruno, “Green’s function technique for studying electron flow in two-dimensional mesoscopic samples”, Phys. Rev. B 72, 235304 (2005)

2005
[53]

Hexagonal Warping Effects in the Surface States of the Topological Insulator Bi 2Te3

L. Fu, “Hexagonal Warping Effects in the Surface States of the Topological Insulator Bi 2Te3”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 266801 (2009)

2009
[54]

Anisotropy of the anomalous hall ef- fect in thin films of the altermagnet candidate mn 5si3

M. Leivisk¨ a, J. Rial, A. Bad’ura, R. L. Seeger, I. Kounta, S. Beckert, et al., “Anisotropy of the anomalous hall ef- fect in thin films of the altermagnet candidate mn 5si3”, Phys. Rev. B 109, 224430 (2024)

2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Beyond con- ventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation sym- metry

L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, “Beyond con- ventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation sym- metry”, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

work page 2022

[2] [2]

Altermagnetism: Exploring new frontiers in magnetism and spintronics

L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. ˇSmejkal, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, “Altermagnetism: Exploring new frontiers in magnetism and spintronics”, Adv. Funct. Mater. , 2409327 (2024)

2024

[3] [3]

Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets

L. ˇSmejkal, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, “Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets”, Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8809 (2020)

work page 2020

[4] [4]

Spin current generation in organic antiferromagnets

M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Yanagi, Y. Mo- tome, and H. Seo, “Spin current generation in organic antiferromagnets”, Nat. Commun. 10, 4305 (2019)

work page 2019

[5] [5]

Anti- ferromagnetism in RuO 2 as d-wave Pomeranchuk insta- bility

K.-H. Ahn, A. Hariki, K.-W. Lee, and J. Kuneˇ s, “Anti- ferromagnetism in RuO 2 as d-wave Pomeranchuk insta- bility”, Phys. Rev. B 99, 184432 (2019)

work page 2019

[6] [6]

Momentum- dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering

S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, “Momentum- dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering”, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 88, 123702 (2019)

work page 2019

[7] [7]

Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-z antiferromagnets

L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, “Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-z antiferromagnets”, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014422 (2020)

work page 2020

[8] [8]

Prediction of unconven- tional magnetism in doped FeSb2

I. I. Mazin, K. Koepernik, M. D. Johannes, R. Gonz´ alez- Hern´ andez, and L. ˇSmejkal, “Prediction of unconven- tional magnetism in doped FeSb2”, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 118, e2108924118 (2021)

2021