Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 87 references

Cuscuton-like contribution to dark energy evolution

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Adding a cuscuton-like term to quintessence dark energy makes the equations first-order and solvable, lets the equation of state cross below −1 without ghosts, and yields AIC support over ΛCDM.

desk verdict A genuinely useful first-order framework for cuscuton dark energy, undermined by a sign inconsistency in the hyperbolic phantom solutions and an AIC misreading that overstates the data support. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.14909 v1 pith:GEV5A46K submitted 2025-01-24 astro-ph.CO

D. Bazeia , J. D. Dantas , S. Santos da Costa This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.CO PACS 98.80.-k95.36.+x
keywords cuscutondarkenergyfirst-orderformalismequationofstatephantomphaseFLRWcosmologyMonteCarloMarkovChainAkaikeInformationCriterion
topics Dark Energy
open problems Dark Energy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that adding a cuscuton-like term, $\alpha\sqrt{|\partial_\mu\phi\,\partial^\mu\phi|}$, to the standard kinetic term of a quintessence scalar field changes the pressure without changing the energy density, and that this minimal modification is enough to let dark energy evolve from a matter- or radiation-dominated phase to a cosmological-constant-like phase. Under the assumption that the field velocity is positive, the equations of motion reduce to a first-order system, $H=W(\phi)$ and $\dot{\phi}=-(W_\phi+\alpha)$, for which the authors obtain analytic solutions for exponential and hyperbolic potentials. For the hyperbolic potential the solutions cross the phantom divide, $\omega<-1$, and the paper shows that the model has positive scalar and tensor sound speeds, so no ghosts or gradient instabilities appear. The paper also fits the single-field exponential version to geometrical cosmological data and, using the Akaike Information Criterion, reports strong support for the cuscuton-like model over $\Lambda$CDM when supernova, BAO, and CMB data are included.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the first-order pair $H=W(\phi)$ and $\dot{\phi}=-(W_\phi+\alpha)$, together with the potential $V=\tfrac{3}{2}W^{2}-\tfrac{1}{2}(W_\phi+\alpha)^{2}$ derived from the Friedmann equation. It converts the second-order equation of motion into a quadrature, so each choice of $W$ gives an analytical cosmic history; the cuscuton constant $\alpha$ enters additively in the field velocity and in the pressure but not in the energy density, which is what allows $\omega$ to drop below $-1$. The stability argument is carried by the identification of the Lagrangian with a subclass of Horndeski theory, which yields $c_s^{2}=1+\alpha/\sqrt{2X}>0$ and $c_{\rm GW}^{2}=1$ for one field, and $v^{2}=0$ for the second field in the two-field case, ruling out ghosts and gradient instabilities in the models considered.

What would settle it

Take the hyperbolic solution $\phi(t)=\frac{2}{B}\operatorname{arctanh}(e^{-AB^{2}t})$, note that $\dot{\phi}<0$, and insert it into the original equation of motion with the cuscuton term evaluated as $|\dot{\phi}|$ rather than $+\dot{\phi}$; the equation is not satisfied. A direct numerical integration of Eq. (5) with the absolute value for the hyperbolic potential, or an independent check of whether $\omega<-1$ persists with the correct sign, would settle the central phantom-phase claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the cuscuton-like addition to the scalar-field dark energy Lagrangian supports a first-order framework analogous to the Hamilton-Jacobi formalism: taking the Hubble parameter as $H=W(\phi)$ makes the field equation $\dot{\phi}=-(W_\phi+\alpha)$, with the potential fixed by $V=\tfrac{3}{2}W^{2}-\tfrac{1}{2}(W_\phi+\alpha)^{2}$. This turns the search for cosmic histories into the choice of $W$, and the paper constructs models where the equation-of-state parameter $\omega$ evolves from the radiation or matter value toward $-1$. In the single-field hyperbolic model, and in two-field models with a hyperbolic component, the evolution crosses into the phantom regime $\omega<-1$ before settling at the cosmological constant; the paper verifies that the scalar and tensor propagation speeds remain positive and that the non-dynamical cuscuton behavior is recovered in the two-field case, so the phantom phase is not accompanied by ghosts. Using the single-field exponential model parametrized by $\rho_{\rm CL}$ in terms of redshift, the paper constrains the extra parameter $B$ and the derived cuscuton parameter $\alpha$ with a background-only Monte Carlo Markov Chain analysis of geometrical probes, and finds AIC differences of $0.4$–$1.6$ relative to $\Lambda$CDM for datasets that include supernovae, BAO, and CMB, which it interprets as strong support.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the unvarying sign choice $\operatorname{sgn}(\dot{\phi})>0$ made when the cuscuton term is written as $+\alpha\dot{\phi}$, because the hyperbolic-potential solutions that produce the phantom phase have $\dot{\phi}<0$ and therefore do not solve the original absolute-value equation of motion unless that sign choice is silently abandoned.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the single-field exponential model, $\omega$ becomes time-dependent and asymptotes to $-1$, so a scalar field that would have constant equation of state in standard dynamics can describe the transition from deceleration to acceleration.
  • In the hyperbolic models, the cuscuton term produces a phantom phase ($\omega<-1$) before the cosmological constant phase, and the stability analysis implies this phase has no ghost or gradient instabilities.
  • In two-field models, the cuscuton parameter $\alpha$ controls the duration of transitions between phases in the exponential case, and the amplitude of fluctuations around the initial phase plus the presence of a phantom phase in the hyperbolic case.
  • The observational fit yields values of the matter density and $H_0$ compatible with $\Lambda$CDM within $1\sigma$, while $\omega$ excludes $-1$ at $1\sigma$ when only cosmic chronometers are used; extended datasets restore $\omega\approx-1$.
  • AIC comparison gives $\Delta\rm AIC=0.4$–$1.6$ for datasets including supernovae, BAO, and CMB, which the paper reads as strong support for the cuscuton-like model over $\Lambda$CDM, although with chronometers alone the model is moderately disfavored ($\Delta\rm AIC=4.1$).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper fixes $\operatorname{sgn}(\dot{\phi})>0$ when writing the cuscuton term, but its hyperbolic-potential solution $\phi(t)=\frac{2}{B}\operatorname{arctanh}(e^{-AB^{2}t})$ has $\dot{\phi}<0$; evaluating the absolute value with the correct sign would reverse the cuscuton contribution in Eq. (5), so the phantom-phase solutions appear to be solutions of a different equation than the one stated
  • The AIC comparison uses only background evolution, as the paper itself acknowledges; a full CMB likelihood and perturbation evolution, including the matter sound speed and growth of structure, could change the statistical verdict.
  • A natural testable extension is to compute the growth rate $f\sigma_8$ in the cuscuton-like model: because the second-field sound speed is $v^{2}=0$, the model predicts a specific non-standard clustering signature that geometric-only data cannot see.
  • If the sign issue is repaired (for example, by allowing $\operatorname{sgn}(\dot{\phi})$ to become time-dependent or by choosing a formulation that makes the sign consistent), the first-order construction itself is a useful template for generating analytic late-time cosmologies with non-canonical kinetic terms.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies a canonical scalar field plus a cuscuton-like term in a flat FLRW background. The authors introduce a first-order formalism H=W(φ), φ̇=-(W_φ+α) under the assumption sgn(φ̇)>0, and use it to construct exponential and hyperbolic potentials for single- and two-field models. They report analytical solutions, discuss transitions to ω=-1, and identify phantom phases for hyperbolic potentials. The paper then adopts an H(z) parametrization inspired by the exponential single-field solution and fits it to cosmic chronometers, Pantheon+, BAO, and geometric CMB data, using AIC to compare with ΛCDM.

Significance. The exponential single-field construction is self-consistent: the solution (27) has φ̇>0 as assumed, and Eq. (72) provides a simple two-parameter H(z) extension of ΛCDM that can be constrained by data. If the phantom-phase claims were valid, the paper would be a useful contribution. However, the hyperbolic-potential solutions violate the sign assumption at the root of the first-order reduction, and the AIC paragraph in Sec. V misstates what positive ΔAIC values mean. These are load-bearing problems for the main theoretical and statistical conclusions.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III.B, Eq. (34)] The first-order reduction is derived under sgn(φ̇)>0 (stated after Eq. (7)), giving Eq. (21) as φ̇=-(W_φ+α). For W=A cosh(Bφ)-αφ this yields φ̇=-AB sinh(Bφ), and the advertised solution (34) has φ̇(t)<0 for all t>0. Hence Eq. (34) does not solve Eq. (5) when the absolute value in the cuscuton term is evaluated with the correct sign, and it does not satisfy Eq. (21) under the assumption used to derive the framework. Repeating the derivation for sgn(φ̇)=-1 gives φ̇=α-W_φ=2α-AB sinh(Bφ), which is not Eq. (34). The phantom-phase curve in Fig. 2 therefore is not a solution of the model defined by Eqs. (4)-(6).
  2. [§V, AIC paragraph after Table I] In Sec. V the paper reports ΔAIC=0.4, 0.9, 1.6 for the cuscuton-like model with ΛCDM as the reference. Under the stated definition ΔAIC=AIC_i-AIC_min (with ΛCDM as the best model), these positive values mean the cuscuton-like model has a larger AIC than ΛCDM; they do not indicate 'strong support' for the cuscuton-like model. At most ΔAIC≤2 shows that the two models are comparable by the usual rule of thumb. The abstract's claim of strong support for the model is therefore not supported by the quoted values; the authors should either recompute the comparison with the cuscuton model as the reference and report the actual AIC values, or substantially soften the claim.
  3. [§IV.B and §IV.C, Eqs. (53)-(55) and (63)-(64)] The same sign inconsistency affects the two-field hyperbolic models. The φ solution used there is again (53a) or (63a), which has φ̇<0 for t>0, while the equations of motion (38a) assume sgn(φ̇)>0. Consequently the e.o.s. results in Figs. 5 and 8, including the phantom phase in Fig. 5, should not be presented as consequences of the cuscuton Lagrangian (37) until the sign branch is handled correctly. The paper needs either to solve the models with the proper sgn(φ̇) branch or to restrict the claim to models that satisfy the stated assumption.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and §II] The text repeatedly has 'FLR W' where 'FLRW' is intended; this typo should be corrected throughout.
  2. [Final remarks] There is a typo 'custucon-like' in the paragraph on future work; it should be 'cuscuton-like'.
  3. [Table I] The column header '2√8 α∗' is not defined in the table or caption; the authors should state the derived quantity being reported (for example, in terms of α/B and H0).
  4. [Eq. (60)] The denominator contains (1-e^{αBt}); consistency with (59a) and the surrounding algebra suggests this should be (1-e^{-αBt}). Please check the sign convention.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the first-order framework is an openly declared ansatz, the potentials are constructed from it, and the observational analysis is ordinary parameter estimation against external data.

full rationale

The paper's central construction is a solution-generating first-order formalism: it assumes H = W(phi) and phi_dot = -(W_phi + alpha) in Eqs. (20)-(21), then solves for the potential through Eq. (22). This is an explicitly stated ansatz rather than a derivation of a prediction from independent inputs; choosing W and computing V is model building, not circular reasoning. The same holds for the two-field generalization in Eqs. (41)-(42). The analytical solutions are illustrative solutions of the constructed potentials, and the observational constraints in Sec. V fit the free parameters (Omega_m0, h, B, and the derived alpha) to external HD/SN/BAO/CMB data using Eq. (72), so no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The self-citations ([45], [58], [65]) motivate the first-order and additive-W choices, but the equations used here are rederived in the paper, and the central results do not rest on an unverified prior result. The notable problems in the paper are correctness and interpretation issues, not circularity: the hyperbolic solution (34) has phi_dot < 0 despite the sgn(phi_dot) > 0 assumption used to derive Eq. (21), and the positive DeltaAIC values quoted in Sec. V do not support the abstract's claim of 'strong support' for the cuscuton model. Neither issue makes the derivation equivalent to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation depends on the sign convention for the cuscuton term, the first-order ansatz H=W(ϕ), and the flat FLRW background; no new entities are introduced. The observational constraint uses four free parameters (Ωm, h, B, and derived α).

free parameters (5)
  • α (cuscuton coupling) = 2√8α* = 55.81 ± 0.89 (Table I, HD+SN+BAO+CMB); α derived from Eq. (73)
    Controls the strength of the cuscuton term; in toy models chosen by hand.
  • B (exponential slope) = 0.337 ± 0.115 (HD+SN+BAO+CMB)
    Controls the redshift evolution of w; sampled with flat prior [0.001,1] in SimpleMC.
  • Ωm,0 = 0.310 ± 0.007
    Matter density parameter sampled in the MCMC.
  • h = 0.672 ± 0.007
    Dimensionless Hubble constant sampled in the MCMC.
  • A, B, C, D in illustrative potentials = chosen by hand (e.g., A=1, B=1.23, C=1, D=2.15)
    Amplitudes and slopes in the W ansätze; not constrained, used to produce Figures 1-8.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Flat, homogeneous, isotropic FLRW metric (3)
    All background equations are derived under this metric.
  • domain assumption sgn(ϕdot)>0 for the cuscuton-coupled field
    Assumed after Eq. (7); violated by the hyperbolic solutions.
  • standard math 4πG=c=1 units
    Action (1) and Friedmann equations use this normalization.
  • domain assumption Horndeski stability criteria of Ref. [44] apply to Lagrangian (4)
    Used to compute c_s² and c_GW² in Eqs. (11)-(18).
  • domain assumption Matter is a pressureless perfect fluid uncoupled to the scalar
    Used for Ωm and H(z) in Sec. V.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Cuscuton-like contribution to dark energy evolution." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GEV5A46K

@misc{pith2026250114909,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Cuscuton-like contribution to dark energy evolution},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GEV5A46K}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.14909}
}
abstract

This work deals with the presence of the cuscuton term in the otherwise standard dark energy evolution under the usual FLRW background. We disclose a first-order framework similar to the Hamilton-Jacobi formalism, which helps us to solve the equations of motion and find analytical solutions. We explore several possibilities, concentrating mainly on how the cuscuton-like contribution works to modify cosmic evolution. Some results are of current interest since they describe scenarios capable of changing the evolution, adding or excluding possible distinct phases during the Universe's expansion history. Additionally, we present interesting constraints on the cuscuton-like contribution for the dark energy evolution using a set of homogeneous geometrical observational probes. Finally, based on the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), we perform a statistical comparison of the cuscuton-like model with $\Lambda$CDM, and find strong support for our model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.14909 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Equation of state parameter ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Equation of state ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Upper panel shows the equation of state ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Upper panel shows the equation of state ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Upper panel shows the equation of state ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Relative densities ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Equation of state ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Upper panel shows the equation of state ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. One-dimensional posterior distributions and two-dimensional joint contours for the parameter space [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Riess et al., Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant , Astron

    A.G. Riess et al., Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant , Astron. J. 116, 1009 (1998)

    1998

  2. [2]

    Perlmutter et al., Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 high-redshift supernovae, Astrophys

    S. Perlmutter et al., Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 high-redshift supernovae, Astrophys. J. 517, 565 (1999)

    1999

  3. [3]

    Knop et al., New constraints on ΩM , ΩΛ, and w from an independent set of eleven high-redshift super- novae observed with HST

    R.A. Knop et al., New constraints on ΩM , ΩΛ, and w from an independent set of eleven high-redshift super- novae observed with HST . Astrophys. J. 598, 102 (2003)

    2003

  4. [4]

    Spergel et al., [WMAP Collaboration], Astrophys

    D.N. Spergel et al., [WMAP Collaboration], Astrophys. J. Suppl. 148, 175 (2003)

    2003

  5. [5]

    Caldwell, M

    R.R. Caldwell, M. Doran, Cosmic microwave background and supernova constraints on quintessence: Concordance regions and target models . Phys. Rev. D 69, 103517 (2004)

    2004

  6. [6]

    Riess et al., Type Ia supernova discoveries at z >1 from the Hubble Space Telescope: evidence for Past de- celeration and constraints on dark energy evolution

    A.G. Riess et al., Type Ia supernova discoveries at z >1 from the Hubble Space Telescope: evidence for Past de- celeration and constraints on dark energy evolution . As- trophys. J. 607, 665 (2004)

    2004

  7. [7]

    Koivisto, D.F

    T. Koivisto, D.F. Mota, Dark energy anisotropic stress and large scale structure formation . Phys. Rev. D 73, 083502 (2006)

    2006

  8. [8]

    Daniel, R.R

    S.F. Daniel, R.R. Caldwell, A. Cooray, A. Melchiorri, Large scale structure as a probe of gravitational slip . Phys. Rev. D 77, 103513 (2008)

    work page 2008

Show all 87 references
  1. [9]

    Kowalski et al., Improved cosmological Constraints from new, old, and combined supernova data sets

    M. Kowalski et al., Improved cosmological Constraints from new, old, and combined supernova data sets. Astron. J. 686, 686 (2008)

    2008

  2. [10]

    Komatsu et al

    E. Komatsu et al. [WMAP Collaboration], Five-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) ob- servations: Cosmological interpretation , Astrophys. J. Suppl. 180, 330 (2009)

    2009

  3. [11]

    Eisenstein et al., Detection of the Baryon Acous- tic Peak in the large-scale correlation function of SDSS luminous red galaxies

    D.J. Eisenstein et al., Detection of the Baryon Acous- tic Peak in the large-scale correlation function of SDSS luminous red galaxies . Astrophys. J. 633, 560 (2005)

    2005

  4. [12]

    Percival at el., Baryon acoustic oscillations in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7 galaxy sample

    W.J. Percival at el., Baryon acoustic oscillations in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7 galaxy sample . Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 401, 2148 (2010)

    2010

  5. [13]

    Copeland, M

    E.J. Copeland, M. Sami, S. Tsujikawa, Dynamics of dark energy. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15, 1753 (2006)

    2006

  6. [14]

    Cai, E.N

    Y.F. Cai, E.N. Saridakis, M.R. Setare, J.Q. Xia, Quin- tom Cosmology: Theoretical implications and observa- tions. Phys. Rept. 493, 1 (2010)

    2010

  7. [15]

    Horndeski, Second-order scalar-tensor field equa- tions in a four-dimensional space , Int

    G.W. Horndeski, Second-order scalar-tensor field equa- tions in a four-dimensional space , Int. J. Theor. Phys. 10, 363 (1974)

    1974

  8. [16]

    Deffayet, X

    C. Deffayet, X. Gao, D.A. Steer, G. Zahariade, From k- essence to generalised Galileons, Phys. Rev. D 84, 064039 (2011)

    2011

  9. [17]

    Kobayashi, M

    T. Kobayashi, M. Yamaguchi, J. Yokoyama, Generalized G-inflation: inflation with the most general second-order field equations, Prog. Theor. Phys. 126, 511 (2011)

    2011

  10. [18]

    Zumalacarregui, T.S

    M. Zumalacarregui, T.S. Koivisto, D.F. Mota, DBI Galileons in the Einstein Frame: Local Gravity and Cos- mology, Phys. Rev. D 87, 083010 (2013)

    2013

  11. [19]

    Gao, D.A

    X. Gao, D.A. Steer, Inflation and primordial nonGaus- sianities of ’generalized Galileons’, JCAP 12, 019 (2011)

    2011

  12. [20]

    Gleyzes, D

    J. Gleyzes, D. Langlois, F. Piazza, F. Vernizzi, Healthy theories beyond Horndeski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 211101 (2015)

    2015

  13. [21]

    Gleyzes, D

    J. Gleyzes, D. Langlois, F. Piazza, F. Vernizzi, Exploring gravitational theories beyond Horndeski , JCAP 02, 018 (2015)

    2015

  14. [22]

    Nicolis, R

    A. Nicolis, R. Rattazzi, E. Trincherini, The Galileon as a local modification of gravity , Phys. Rev. D 79, 064036 (2009)

    2009

  15. [23]

    Gomes, D

    H. Gomes, D. C. Guariento, Hamiltonian analysis of the cuscuton, Phys. Rev. D 95, 104049 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    Afshordi, D.J.H

    N. Afshordi, D.J.H. Chung, G. Geshnizjani, cuscuton: A Causal Field Theory with an Infinite Speed of Sound , Phys. Rev. D 75, 083513 (2007)

    2007

  17. [25]

    Afshordi, D.J

    N. Afshordi, D.J. Chung, M. Doran, G. Geshnizjani, cuscuton cosmology: dark energy meets modified gravity , Phys. Rev. D 75, 123509 (2007)

    2007

  18. [26]

    Iyonaga, K

    A. Iyonaga, K. Takahashi, T. Kobayashi, Extended cus- cuton: formulation , JCAP 12, 002 (2018)

    2018

  19. [27]

    Iyonaga, K

    A. Iyonaga, K. Takahashi, T. Kobayashi, Extended cus- cuton as dark energy , JCAP 07, 004 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    Afshordi, cuscuton and low energy limit of Horava- Lifshitz gravity, Phys

    N. Afshordi, cuscuton and low energy limit of Horava- Lifshitz gravity, Phys. Rev. D 80, 081502 (2009)

    2009

  21. [29]

    Bhattacharyya, A

    J. Bhattacharyya, A. Coates, M. Colombo, A.E. G¨ umr¨ uk¸ c¨ uoglu, T.P. Sotiriou,Revisiting the cuscuton as a lorentz-violating gravity theory , Phys. Rev. D 97, 064020 (2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    S. S. Boruah, H. J. Kim, M. Rouben and G. Gesh- nizjani, Cuscuton bounce , JCAP 08, 031 (2018) [arXiv:1802.06818 [gr-qc]]

    2018 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Quintin and D

    J. Quintin and D. Yoshida, Cuscuton gravity as a clas- sically stable limiting curvature theory , JCAP 02, 016 (2020) [arXiv:1911.06040 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  24. [32]

    J. L. Kim and G. Geshnizjani, Spectrum of Cuscuton Bounce, JCAP 03, 104 (2021) [arXiv:2010.06645 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    A. Ito, A. Iyonaga, S. Kim and J. Soda, Dressed power- law inflation with a cuscuton , Phys. Rev. D 99, no.8, 083502 (2019) [arXiv:1902.08663 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2019 arXiv

  26. [34]

    A. Ito, A. Iyonaga, S. Kim, J. Soda, Dressed power- law inflation with a cuscuton , Phys. Rev. D 99, 083502 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    Adshead, D

    P. Adshead, D. Blas, C. Burgess, P. Hayman, S.P. Patil, Magnon inflation: slow roll with steep potentials , JCAP 11, 009 (2016)

    2016

  28. [36]

    Bartolo, A

    N. Bartolo, A. Ganz, S. Matarrese, cuscuton inflation , JCAP 05, 009 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    Mansoori, Z

    S.A.H. Mansoori, Z. Molaee, Multi-field cuscuton Cos- mology, arXiv:2207.06720v1 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  30. [38]

    de Rham and H

    C. de Rham and H. Motohashi, Caustics for Spherical Waves. Phys. Rev. D 95, 064008 (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    Panpanich, Cuscuta-Galileon cos- mology: Dynamics, gravitational ”constant”s and the Hubble Constant

    Kei-Ichi Maeda and S. Panpanich, Cuscuta-Galileon cos- mology: Dynamics, gravitational ”constant”s and the Hubble Constant. Phys. Rev. D 105, 104022 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    Inflation and dark sector physics in light of next-generation cosmological surveys

    the study deals with self-tuning of the cosmological constant within specific braneworld models. In general, the equation of motion of the cuscuton field does not induce dynamics, so it just acts as an auxiliary field. Other recent possibilities appeared in [41, 42], in the co...

    2025 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Lacombe and S

    O. Lacombe and S. Mukohyama, Self-tuning of the cos- mological constant in brane-worlds with P (X, ϕ). JCAP 10, 014 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    J.L. Rosa, D. Bazeia, A.S. Lob˜ ao Jr., Effects of cus- cuton dynamics on braneworld configurations in the scalar–tensor representation of f (R, T) gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 250 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    Bazeia, A.S

    D. Bazeia, A.S. Lob˜ ao Jr., Models of modified F (R, T) and cuscuton braneworld. EPL 136, 61002 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    Zhong, Fei-Yu Li, Xu-Dong Liu, K-field kinks in two- dimensional dilaton gravity , Phys

    Y. Zhong, Fei-Yu Li, Xu-Dong Liu, K-field kinks in two- dimensional dilaton gravity , Phys. Lett. B 822, 136716 (2021). 15

    2021

  37. [45]

    Kobayashi, Horndeski theory and beyond: a re- view, Rept

    T. Kobayashi, Horndeski theory and beyond: a re- view, Rept. Prog. Phys. 82, no.8, 086901 (2019) [arXiv:1901.07183 [gr-qc]]

    2019 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Bazeia, C.B

    D. Bazeia, C.B. Gomes, L. Losano, R. Menezes, First- order formalism and dark energy. Phys. Lett. B 633, 415 (2006)

    2006

  39. [47]

    Skenderis, P

    K. Skenderis, P. K. Townsend, Phys. Rev. D 74, 125008 (2006)

    2006

  40. [48]

    Halliwell, Scalar Fields in Cosmology with an Expo- nential Potential

    J. Halliwell, Scalar Fields in Cosmology with an Expo- nential Potential . Phys. Lett. B 185, 341 (1987)

    1987

  41. [49]

    Burd, J.D

    A. Burd, J.D. Barrow, Inflationary Models with Expo- nential Potentials . Nucl. Phys. B 308, 929 (1988)

    1988

  42. [50]

    Wands, E.J

    D. Wands, E.J. Copeland, A.R. Liddle, Expo- nential Potentials, Scaling Solutions, and Inflation . Texas/PASCOS ’92: Relativistic Astrophysics and Par- ticle Cosmology 688, 647 (1993)

    1993

  43. [51]

    Copeland, A.R

    E.J. Copeland, A.R. Liddle, D. Wands, Exponential po- tentials and cosmological scaling solutions . Phys. Rev. D 57, 4686 (1998)

    1998

  44. [52]

    Baumann, L

    D. Baumann, L. McAllister, Inflation and String Theory . Cambridge University Press. (2015)

    2015

  45. [53]

    Billyard, The Asymptotic Behaviour of Cosmological Models Containing Matter and Scalar Fields (PhD thesis, Dalhousie University, 1999)

    A.P. Billyard, The Asymptotic Behaviour of Cosmological Models Containing Matter and Scalar Fields (PhD thesis, Dalhousie University, 1999)

    1999

  46. [54]

    Huterer, M.S

    D. Huterer, M.S. Turner, Prospects for probing the dark energy via supernova distance . Phys. Rev. D 60, 081301(R) (1999)

    1999

  47. [55]

    Amendola, S

    L. Amendola, S. Tsujikawa, Dark energy; theory and ob- servations. Cambridge University Press (2013)

    2013

  48. [56]

    Journal of the Korean Physical Society 63, 1675 (2013)

    Hyeong-Chan Kim, A new variable in scalar cosmol- ogy with an exponential potential . Journal of the Korean Physical Society 63, 1675 (2013)

    2013

  49. [57]

    Bahamonde, C

    S. Bahamonde, C. G. B ¨Ohmer, S. Carloni, E. J. Copeland, W. Fang, N. Tamanini, Dynamical systems applied to cosmology: dark energy and modified gravity . Phys. Rept. 775-777, 1 (2018)

    2018

  50. [58]

    Avsajanishvili, G

    O. Avsajanishvili, G. Y. Chitov, T. Kahniashvili, S. Man- dal and L. Samushia, Observational Constraints on Dy- namical Dark Energy Models , Universe 10, no.3, 122 (2024) [arXiv:2310.16911 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Afonso, D

    V.I. Afonso, D. Bazeia, L. Losano, First-order formalism for bent brane . Physics Letters B 634, 526 (2006)

    2006

  52. [60]

    Caldwell, A phantom menace? Cosmological conse- quences of a dark energy component with super-negative equation of state

    R.R. Caldwell, A phantom menace? Cosmological conse- quences of a dark energy component with super-negative equation of state . Phys. Lett. B 545, 23 (2002)

    2002

  53. [61]

    Caldwell, M

    R.R. Caldwell, M. Kamionkowski, N.N. Weinberg, Phan- tom energy and cosmic doomsday , Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 071301 (2003)

    2003

  54. [62]

    Carroll, M

    S.M. Carroll, M. Hoffman, M. Trodden, Can the dark energy equation-of-state parameter ω be less than −1?, Phys. Rev. D 68, 023509 (2003)

    2003

  55. [63]

    Faraoni, Phantom cosmology with general potentials

    V. Faraoni, Phantom cosmology with general potentials . Class. Quantum Grav. 22, 3235 (2005)

    2005

  56. [64]

    Tripathy, B

    S.K. Tripathy, B. Mishra, Phantom cosmology in an ex- tended theory of gravity . Chinese Journal of Physics 63, 448 (2020)

    2020

  57. [65]

    Aghanim et al

    N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. As- trophys. 641, A6 (2020)

    2020

  58. [66]

    Bazeia, F.A

    D. Bazeia, F.A. Brito, L. Losano, Scalar fields, bent branes, and RG flow . JHEP 11, 064 (2006)

    2006

  59. [67]

    Aubourg et al

    ´E. Aubourg et al. [BOSS], Cosmological implications of baryon acoustic oscillation measurements , Phys. Rev. D 92, no.12, 123516 (2015) [arXiv:1411.1074 [astro- ph.CO]]

    2015 arXiv

  60. [68]

    You can download the original code here: https://github.com/ja-vazquez/SimpleMC

  61. [69]

    Cooke, M

    R. Cooke, M. Pettini, R. A. Jorgenson, M. T. Murphy and C. C. Steidel, Precision measures of the primor- dial abundance of deuterium , Astrophys. J. 781, no.1, 31 (2014) [arXiv:1308.3240 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2014 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Moresco, L

    M. Moresco, L. Pozzetti, A. Cimatti, R. Jimenez, C. Maraston, L. Verde, D. Thomas, A. Citro, R. To- jeiro and D. Wilkinson, A 6% measurement of the Hub- ble parameter at z ∼ 0.45: direct evidence of the epoch of cosmic re-acceleration , JCAP 05, 014 (2016) [arXiv:1601.01701 [a...

    2016 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Brout, D

    D. Brout, D. Scolnic, B. Popovic, A. G. Riess, J. Zuntz, R. Kessler, A. Carr, T. M. Davis, S. Hinton and D. Jones, et al. The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmolog- ical Constraints , Astrophys. J. 938, no.2, 110 (2022) [arXiv:2202.04077 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2022 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Alam et al

    S. Alam et al. [BOSS], The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 470, no.3, 2617-2652 (2017) [arXiv:1607.03155 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2017 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Ata et al

    M. Ata et al. [eBOSS], The clustering of the SDSS- IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey DR14 quasar sample: first measurement of baryon acoustic oscillations between redshift 0.8 and 2.2 , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 473, no.4, 4773-4794 (2018) [arXiv:1705.06373...

    2018 arXiv

  66. [74]

    de Sainte Agathe et al

    V. de Sainte Agathe et al. [eBOSS], Baryon acoustic os- cillations at z = 2.34 from the correlations of Ly α ab- sorption in eBOSS DR14 , Astron. Astrophys. 629, A85 (2019) [arXiv:1904.03400 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2019 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Blomqvist et al

    M. Blomqvist et al. [eBOSS], Baryon acoustic oscillations from the cross-correlation of Lyα absorption and quasars in eBOSS DR14 , Astron. Astrophys. 629, A86 (2019) [arXiv:1904.03430 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2019 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Beutler et al., The 6dF Galaxy Survey: baryon acous- tic oscillations and the local Hubble constant , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society,416, 4 (2011)

    F. Beutler et al., The 6dF Galaxy Survey: baryon acous- tic oscillations and the local Hubble constant , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society,416, 4 (2011)

    2011

  69. [77]

    A. J. Ross, L. Samushia, C. Howlett, W. J. Percival, A. Burden and M. Manera, The clustering of the SDSS DR7 main Galaxy sample – I. A 4 per cent distance mea- sure at z = 0.15, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 449, no.1, 835-847 (2015) [arXiv:1409.3242 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2015 arXiv

  70. [78]

    P. A. R. Ade et al. [Planck], Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 594, A13 (2016) [arXiv:1502.01589 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2016 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Akaike, A new look at the statistical model identifi- cation, in IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, no

    H. Akaike, A new look at the statistical model identifi- cation, in IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, no. 6 (1974)

    1974

  72. [80]

    K. P. Burnham and D. R. Anderson, Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, New York, NY: Springer New York, 2002

    2002

  73. [81]

    Faraoni, Cosmology in Scalar-Tensor Gravity

    V. Faraoni, Cosmology in Scalar-Tensor Gravity. (Springer, 2004)

    2004

  74. [82]

    Saridakis and M

    E.N. Saridakis and M. Tsoukalas, Cosmology in new grav- itational scalar-tensor theories. Phys. Rev. D 93, 124032 (2016)

    2016

  75. [83]

    Gon¸ calves, J.L

    T.B. Gon¸ calves, J.L. Rosa, and F.S.N. Lobo, Cosmolog- ical sudden singularities in f(R,T) gravity. Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 418 (2022)

    2022

  76. [84]

    Antoniadis, A

    I. Antoniadis, A. Guillen, and K. Tamvakis, Late time acceleration in Palatini gravity. JHEP 2022, 144 (2022). 16

    2022

  77. [85]

    Bains, M.P

    J.S. Bains, M.P. Hertzberg, and F. Wilczek, JCAP 05. 011 (2017)

    2017

  78. [86]

    D. A. Easson and T. Manton, Phys. Rev. D 99, 043507 (2019)

    2019

  79. [87]

    Ferreira Junior, N

    A.L. Ferreira Junior, N. Pinto-Neto, and J. Zanelli, Phys. Rev. D 109, 023515 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.