Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 50 references

MimicGait: A Model Agnostic approach for Occluded Gait Recognition using Correlational Knowledge Distillation

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a mimic network trained with multi-instance correlational distillation can recover gait signatures from occluded video well enough to outperform occlusion-aware baselines across three backbones and three outdoor…

desk verdict Competent, honestly reported extension for occluded gait; synthetic-only validation and an unvalidated metric keep the central claim conditional. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.15666 v1 pith:5V3SGGFB submitted 2025-01-26 cs.CV

Ayush Gupta , Rama Chellappa This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords occludedgaitrecognitionknowledgedistillationcorrelationalmodel-agnosticvisibilityestimationsilhouette-basedrankretrieval
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Gait recognition fails when a walker is partly hidden, and most existing methods either ignore occlusion or try to reconstruct the hidden body. This paper claims that a better strategy is to teach a new 'mimic' network, which sees only occluded video, to reproduce the gait signature that a teacher network produces from the same person's full-body video. The mimic learns correlations between hidden and visible body parts across multiple clips of the same subject, guided by a small Visibility Estimation Network that says where and how much occlusion is present. Across three backbones (GaitBase, GaitGL, DeepGaitV2) and three outdoor datasets (GREW, Gait3D, BRIAR), the mimic outperforms zero-shot baselines, occlusion-retrained baselines, and the prior occlusion-aware method. If right, occlusion robustness can be bolted onto any silhouette-based gait backbone without changing its architecture.

What carries the argument

The central object is the multi-instance correlational distillation (MiCKD) loss, Eq. (2), a triplet margin loss $L = \sum_i [D_{a,p}^i - D_{a,n}^i + m]_+$. The three anchor-positive pair types let the loss capture intra-sequence correlations (same clip: $\gamma_m^i \leftrightarrow \gamma_t^i$) and inter-sequence correlations (same subject across clips: $\gamma_m^i \leftrightarrow \gamma_t^j$ and $\gamma_m^i \leftrightarrow \gamma_m^j$). The second piece is the Visibility Estimation Network (VEN), trained with both an occlusion-type classifier and an occlusion-amount regressor, then frozen, whose penultimate feature vector is concatenated into the later fully connected layers of the backbone via a linear transform. Together, the loss transfers the teacher's holistic knowledge while VEN tells the mimic what is missing, so the mimic learns which visible motions correlate with the hidden ones.

What would settle it

Evaluate the trained mimic on a real-occlusion probe set, such as subjects partially hidden by terrain, vehicles, or other people at 100-1000 m, and compare Rank-1 against the same backbones' baselines; if the mimic's advantage over the occlusion-retrained baseline shrinks or disappears, the learned correlations do not transfer from synthetic patches. A cheaper check is already in the paper: Tab. 11 shows Rank-1 moving from 28.38 at 40-60% occlusion to 45.35 at 10-30%, so the real-world value hinges on matching the real occlusion distribution.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim, stated in Section 5, is that capturing correlations between occluded and visible body parts with the mimic network helps in occluded scenarios. Concretely, a pretrained holistic teacher $F_t$ encodes full-body silhouettes into signatures $\gamma_t$; a mimic $F_m$, initialized with the same architecture, sees only occluded videos $O_i$ and, with VEN's visibility features concatenated, produces $\gamma_m$. A multi-instance correlational distillation loss, Eq. (2), pulls $\gamma_m$ toward $\gamma_t$ within the same clip, across clips of the same subject, and across the mimic's own clips, while pushing away other identities. The reported result is occluded rank retrieval above Baseline-1, Baseline-2, and the prior occlusion-aware method on all three datasets, with the largest jump on GaitBase/GREW: Rank-1 28.38 vs 16.42 for the occlusion-retrained baseline. The paper concludes that the occlusion-robust signatures come from learned correlation, not from reconstructing hidden pixels.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that synthetic black-patch occlusions (40-60% crops and moving patches) faithfully model real occlusions at range; the paper explicitly notes in Section 6 that it could not test real occlusions because the outdoor datasets used lack an occlusion category.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Occlusion robustness becomes a training-stage add-on: any silhouette-based gait backbone can be wrapped with a teacher, a mimic, and VEN without changing its inference architecture.
  • Retraining a backbone on occluded data alone is not enough; the mimic's correlational distillation is what closes the gap to holistic performance, as shown by the GaitBase/GREW Rank-1 jump from 16.42 to 28.38.
  • Models trained on top and bottom occlusions transfer to middle and dynamic occlusions in a zero-shot setting, and adapt to a new occlusion type with roughly 11% extra training, so deployment against unseen occlusion types is plausible.
  • The RP metric, defined as occluded performance divided by holistic performance, makes occlusion-mitigation strength comparable across backbones of very different absolute accuracy, which matters for low-accuracy regimes like BRIAR.
  • Training on the combined set of all synthetic occlusion types yields Rank-1 of 43.0 on GREW with GaitBase, well above the 30.3 of the occlusion-retrained baseline.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural testable extension is to train VEN on real occlusion masks or on occlusion labels from a dataset that annotates hidden regions, and measure whether the mimic's advantage over the occlusion-retrained baseline survives the domain shift.
  • The same student-teacher recipe could transfer to other partial-input recognition tasks such as face recognition in a crowd, person re-identification, or iris recognition at a distance, since it requires only a holistic teacher and a visibility estimator.
  • The reported sensitivity to occlusion severity (Rank-1 45.35 at 10-30% occlusion vs 28.38 at 40-60%) suggests the method may be best deployed with a calibrated estimate of occlusion amount, for example by weighting the mimic's guidance by VEN's regression output.
  • Because adding cross-entropy loss to MiCKD reduces performance, the gain appears to come from relative structure in the embedding rather than class separability; probing with other auxiliary losses could clarify why.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes MimicGait, a model-agnostic method for occluded gait recognition. A teacher network is trained on holistic silhouette sequences; a mimic network is trained on synthetically occluded sequences using a multi-instance correlational distillation loss (Eq. 2) and is guided by a Visibility Estimation Network (VEN). The method is evaluated on GREW, Gait3D, and BRIAR with GaitBase, GaitGL, and DeepGaitV2 backbones, and is compared against zero-shot baselines, occlusion-retrained baselines, and a prior occlusion-aware method [13]. The authors also introduce generalizability and adaptability evaluation protocols and a Relative Performance (RP) metric. They report consistent Rank-1/Rank-5 improvements across backbones and datasets and release code.

Significance. The internal comparison is competently controlled: all baselines are re-trained under the same synthetic occlusion protocol, a sanity check reproduces official GREW protocol numbers (Supp. Table 6), and the supplement reports a reproducibility standard deviation of 0.35% Rank-1 for the main result. If the synthetic-occlusion results transfer to real conditions, the method would provide a practical plug-in for occlusion robustness without architectural changes. However, the central claim is only validated under synthetic black-patch/crop occlusions sampled from a single range, and the paper's own supplement acknowledges that real occlusions exist in BRIAR. The strong sensitivity of the results to the synthetic occlusion range (Tab. 11) and the ambiguity in the RP metric definition further limit the strength of the conclusions. The work is of interest to the occlusion-robust recognition community, but the current evidence is conditional.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 4.2, Sec. 6, Supp. Sec. 9, Tab. 11] The evaluation is conducted exclusively on synthetic occlusions (top/bottom crops and moving patches) sampled from a fixed range R=(0.4,0.6), and training and evaluation draw from the same distribution. Tab. 11 shows that changing only R to (0.1,0.3) raises GREW/GaitBase Rank-1 from 28.38 to 45.35, demonstrating that absolute performance is tightly coupled to the chosen synthetic distribution. The paper's Sec. 6 states that real-occlusion testing was impossible because the outdoor datasets lack an occlusion category, yet Supp. Sec. 9 says BRIAR contains videos with significant lower-body occlusions. This internal inconsistency, together with the sensitivity in Tab. 11, means the central claim in Sec. 5 that the mimic network 'does indeed help in occluded scenarios' is not yet established for real occlusions at range, which is the deployment scenario motivating the work.
  2. [Sec. 4.5, Eq. (3), Fig. 4] The RP metric is presented as a way to isolate the strength of the occlusion-mitigating method when comparing across backbones. However, the paper does not specify whether HP in Eq. (3) is the holistic accuracy of the backbone (a constant per backbone) or the holistic accuracy of the method being evaluated. If HP is a backbone constant, RP is a monotonic rescaling of OP and cannot change the ranking of methods within a backbone; if HP is method-specific, an occlusion-trained model with depressed holistic accuracy would receive an inflated RP. In either case, the claim that RP 'filters out' backbone or dataset difficulty is not supported, and the slope-based interpretation in Fig. 4 assumes a fixed HP that is not controlled in the experiments. Because RP is used in Sec. 5 to argue for improvements where absolute gains are small (e.g., GaitGL on Gait3D), the metric's validity is load-bearing for part of the paper's analysis.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 4.2] The sentence 'Other works on occluded gait recognition[13] simulate more type of occlusions' should read 'more types of occlusions'.
  2. [Supp. Sec. 10, Fig. 6] There are typos in the supplement: 'acorss the frame' should be 'across the frame', and the caption for Fig. 6 says 'second tow' instead of 'second row'.
  3. [Sec. 4.1, Table 1] The text and table headers contain inconsistent spacing in 'UA V', 'T AR@0.01', and 'F AR'; standard typography would improve readability.
  4. [References] Reference [35] lists the authors as 'Daniel Ponsa Vassileios Balntas, Edgar Riba and Krystian Mikolajczyk'; the author order and formatting appear garbled and should be corrected.
  5. [Supp. Table 6] The local evaluation protocol for GREW gives lower scores than the official protocol, and this difference is explained in the supplement; adding a sentence in the main text would help readers comparing the reported numbers with published GREW results.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: MimicGait's distillation training and evaluation are independent, with self-citations used as baselines and ablations rather than as load-bearing evidence.

full rationale

MimicGait's derivation chain is self-contained. The mimic network Fm is trained on synthetically occluded videos under a multi-instance correlational distillation loss (Eq. 2) with the holistic teacher Ft as supervision, and evaluation measures rank retrieval on held-out subjects under the same synthetic occlusion protocol. The central comparison is between Fm, Baseline-1, Baseline-2, and the re-trained prior method [13], so the claimed gains are not an identity and not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The Visibility Estimation Network (Eq. 1) is a learned auxiliary estimator trained to predict occlusion type and amount, and at test time it sees only the occluded video, not ground-truth occlusion labels; its contribution is ablated in Tab. 4, so it is not an input smuggled into the output. The paper's self-citation to [13] is used as a baseline and as a starting point for VEN, but the paper re-trains [13] on the same protocol and outperforms it empirically, so the citation is not load-bearing proof. The stated limitation in Sec. 6 ('we could not test our approach on real occlusions') and Tab. 11's sensitivity to the synthetic occlusion range are external-validity concerns, not circularity: they do not make the training/evaluation loop self-confirming. The RP metric (Eq. 3) is a normalization, not a fitted prediction; whether it over-amplifies gains on weak backbones is a metric-choice debate, not a circular derivation. No load-bearing step reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical or conceptual entities are postulated. The practical free parameters are the synthetic occlusion ranges, the triplet margin, the VEN loss weights and the occlusion simulation ranges, several chosen empirically. The central untested premise is that synthetic black-patch occlusion statistics match real occlusion statistics at range.

free parameters (6)
  • Occlusion range R = (0.4, 0.6)
    Amount of synthetic occlusion sampled uniformly; set ad hoc for all experiments and strongly influences results (Tab. 11: Rank-1 28.38 at 40-60% vs 45.35 at 10-30%).
  • Triplet margin m = 0.05
    Margin of the multi-instance correlational distillation loss; chosen by hand with no sensitivity analysis reported.
  • VEN loss weights lambda_ce, lambda_r = 1.0, 10.0
    Empirically selected to give the best proxy-task performance (Sec. 12); no ablation shown for these values.
  • Dynamic patch speed range Rs = (0.5, 1.0) pixels/frame
    Chosen by visual inspection: the authors state they 'visualize patches with different speeds and empirically decide' the realistic range.
  • Tall patch width range Rt = (0.2, 0.4)
    Ad hoc choice intended to simulate thin objects like poles; no justification beyond plausibility.
  • Frame sampling n = 20-40 frames (GaitBase, DeepGaitV2); 30 frames (GaitGL)
    Number of contiguous frames sampled per video in training; design choice, and consistency across compared methods is not demonstrated.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Temporal patterns in occluded body parts are correlated with observable motion in the gait sequence
    Central premise stated in Sec. 1 and Sec. 3.2; if false, the distillation target contains no recoverable signal for the missing parts.
  • domain assumption The teacher network trained on holistic videos provides a target distribution that is beneficial for occluded inputs
    Assumed in Sec. 3.2; no analysis of how teacher quality or teacher failure modes affect the distilled student.
  • standard math Correlation-congruence knowledge distillation transfers from image classification to gait feature learning across instances
    Borrowed mechanism in Sec. 3.3; the multi-instance triplet formulation is an adaptation of [29].
  • domain assumption The OpenGait local probe-gallery protocol for GREW is a valid proxy for official GREW evaluation
    Acknowledged in Sec. 14 and cross-checked via the official submission website in Tab. 6; official numbers are higher, so comparisons to other published results are not directly transferable.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of MimicGait: A Model Agnostic approach for Occluded Gait Recognition using Correlational Knowledge Distillation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5V3SGGFB

@misc{pith2026250115666,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: MimicGait: A Model Agnostic approach for Occluded Gait Recognition using Correlational Knowledge Distillation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5V3SGGFB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.15666}
}
read the original abstract

Gait recognition is an important biometric technique over large distances. State-of-the-art gait recognition systems perform very well in controlled environments at close range. Recently, there has been an increased interest in gait recognition in the wild prompted by the collection of outdoor, more challenging datasets containing variations in terms of illumination, pitch angles, and distances. An important problem in these environments is that of occlusion, where the subject is partially blocked from camera view. While important, this problem has received little attention. Thus, we propose MimicGait, a model-agnostic approach for gait recognition in the presence of occlusions. We train the network using a multi-instance correlational distillation loss to capture both inter-sequence and intra-sequence correlations in the occluded gait patterns of a subject, utilizing an auxiliary Visibility Estimation Network to guide the training of the proposed mimic network. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on challenging real-world datasets like GREW, Gait3D and BRIAR. We release the code in https://github.com/Ayush-00/mimicgait.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.15666 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Visualizations of the synthetic occlusions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of the proposed approach. The training procedure consists of two stages. In the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Some samples images taken from the BRIAR dataset for two subjects. From left to right, the range of capture increases from close range to 1000m for each subject. A large variation in the qual￾ity of the videos and the collection conditions can be seen. Subjects have consented to the use of these images in publication. that contains many variations in the walking condi￾tions of subjects. The subset of BRIAR data we u… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparing two hypothetical occlusion￾mitigating methods M1/M2 between two backbones B1/B2 on occluded performance (OP) and holistic performance (HP). A small change ∆y1 in OP can cause a large change in the slope/RP for B1, but a larger ∆y2 is needed to cause a similar…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Some more sample frames taken from videos present in the BRIAR dataset. Subjects have [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: More visualizations of the synthetic oc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Visualization of some of the failure cases [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Visualization of t-SNE features with and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [29]

    Correlation congruence for knowledge dis- tillation

    Baoyun Peng, Xiao Jin, Jiaheng Liu, Dongsheng Li, Yichao Wu, Yu Liu, Shunfeng Zhou, and Zhaoning Zhang. Correlation congruence for knowledge dis- tillation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Interna- tional Conference on Computer Vision , pages 5007– 5016, 2019. 4, 6

    work page 2019

  2. [13]

    You can run but not hide: Improving gait recognition with in- trinsic occlusion type awareness

    Ayush Gupta and Rama Chellappa. You can run but not hide: Improving gait recognition with in- trinsic occlusion type awareness. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), pages 5893–5902, Jan- uary 2024. 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 4, 6

    work page 2024

  3. [1]

    Occlude Them All: Occlusion-Aware Attention Network for Occluded Person Re-ID

    Peixian Chen, Wenfeng Liu, Pingyang Dai, Jianzhuang Liu, Qixiang Ye, Mingliang Xu, Qi’an Chen, and Rongrong Ji. Occlude Them All: Occlusion-Aware Attention Network for Occluded Person Re-ID. pages 11833–11842, 2021. 3

    work page 2021

  4. [2]

    Santos-Villalobos, and David S

    David Cornett, Joel Brogan, Nell Barber, Deniz Aykac, Seth Baird, Nicholas Burchfield, Carl Dukes, Andrew Duncan, Regina Ferrell, Jim Goddard, Gavin Jager, Matthew Larson, Bart Murphy, Christi Johnson, Ian Shelley, Nisha Srinivas, Brandon Stock- well, Leanne Thompson, Matthew Yohe, Robert Zhang, Scott Dolvin, Hector J. Santos-Villalobos, and David S. Bolm...

    work page 2023

  5. [3]

    Deep learning based 2d human pose estima- tion: A survey

    Qi Dang, Jianqin Yin, Bin Wang, and Wenqing Zheng. Deep learning based 2d human pose estima- tion: A survey. Tsinghua Science and Technology , 24(6):663–676, 2019. 3

    work page 2019

  6. [4]

    Exploring deep models for practical gait recog- nition

    Chao Fan, Saihui Hou, Yongzhen Huang, and Shiqi Yu. Exploring deep models for practical gait recog- nition. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.03301 , 2023. 3, 7, 9, 6

    arXiv 2023

  7. [5]

    Opengait: Re- visiting gait recognition towards better practical- ity

    Chao Fan, Junhao Liang, Chuanfu Shen, Saihui Hou, Yongzhen Huang, and Shiqi Yu. Opengait: Re- visiting gait recognition towards better practical- ity. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages 9707–9716, June 2023. 2, 3, 7, 10, 5, 6, 9

    work page 2023

  8. [6]

    SkeletonGait: Gait Recognition Using Skeleton Maps

    Chao Fan, Jingzhe Ma, Dongyang Jin, Chuanfu Shen, and Shiqi Yu. Skeletongait: Gait recog- nition using skeleton maps. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.13444, 2023. 3

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

Show all 50 references
  1. [7]

    Gaitpart: Temporal part- based model for gait recognition

    Chao Fan, Yunjie Peng, Chunshui Cao, Xu Liu, Saihui Hou, Jiannan Chi, Yongzhen Huang, Qing Li, and Zhiqiang He. Gaitpart: Temporal part- based model for gait recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2020. 3, 5

    2020

  2. [8]

    Passos, Rafael Gon¸ calves Pires, Daniel Felipe Silva Santos, Lucas Pascotti Valem, Thierry P

    Claudio Filipi Gon¸ calves dos Santos, Diego de Souza Oliveira, Leandro A. Passos, Rafael Gon¸ calves Pires, Daniel Felipe Silva Santos, Lucas Pascotti Valem, Thierry P. Moreira, Marcos Cleison S. Santana, Ma- teus Roder, Jo Paulo Papa, and Danilo Colombo. Gait recognition bas...

    2022

  3. [9]

    Gpgait: Generalized pose- based gait recognition

    Yang Fu, Shibei Meng, Saihui Hou, Xuecai Hu, and Yongzhen Huang. Gpgait: Generalized pose- based gait recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages 19595–19604, October 2023. 3

    2023

  4. [10]

    Gait recognition using wearable motion recording sensors

    Davrondzhon Gafurov and Einar Snekkenes. Gait recognition using wearable motion recording sensors. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Process- ing, 2009:1–16, 2009. 1, 3

    2009

  5. [11]

    Knowledge distillation: A sur- vey

    Jianping Gou, Baosheng Yu, Stephen J Maybank, and Dacheng Tao. Knowledge distillation: A sur- vey. International Journal of Computer Vision , 129:1789–1819, 2021. 4

    2021

  6. [12]

    Multi-modal human authentica- tion using silhouettes, gait and rgb

    Yuxiang Guo, Cheng Peng, Chun Pong Lau, and Rama Chellappa. Multi-modal human authentica- tion using silhouettes, gait and rgb. In 2023 IEEE 17th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG), pages 1–7, 2023. 3

    2023

  7. [14]

    Multi-level feature fusion for robust pose-based gait recognition using rnn

    Md Mahedi Hasan and Hossen Asiful Mustafa. Multi-level feature fusion for robust pose-based gait recognition using rnn. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Se- cur.(IJCSIS), 18(1), 2020. 3

    2020

  8. [15]

    Distilling image dehazing with heterogeneous task imitation

    Ming Hong, Yuan Xie, Cuihua Li, and Yanyun Qu. Distilling image dehazing with heterogeneous task imitation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 3462–3471, 2020. 4

    2020

  9. [16]

    Analysis of model compression using knowledge distillation

    Yu-Wei Hong, Jenq-Shiou Leu, Muhamad Faisal, and Setya Widyawan Prakosa. Analysis of model compression using knowledge distillation. IEEE Ac- cess, 10:85095–85105, 2022. 4

    2022

  10. [17]

    Codit: Conformal out-of- distribution detection in time-series data for cyber- physical systems

    Ramneet Kaur, Kaustubh Sridhar, Sangdon Park, Yahan Yang, Susmit Jha, Anirban Roy, Oleg Sokol- sky, and Insup Lee. Codit: Conformal out-of- distribution detection in time-series data for cyber- physical systems. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 14th International Conference on C...

    2023

  11. [18]

    Kingma and Jimmy Ba

    Diederik P. Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In Yoshua Ben- gio and Yann LeCun, editors, 3rd International Con- ference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015, San Diego, CA, USA, May 7-9, 2015, Conference Track Proceedings, 2015. 7, 5

    2015

  12. [19]

    End-to-end model-based gait recognition

    Xiang Li, Yasushi Makihara, Chi Xu, Yasushi Yagi, Shiqi Yu, and Mingwu Ren. End-to-end model-based gait recognition. In Proceedings of the Asian Confer- ence on Computer Vision (ACCV) , November 2020. 3

    2020

  13. [20]

    Gaitedge: Beyond plain end-to-end gait recognition for better practi- cality

    Junhao Liang, Chao Fan, Saihui Hou, Chuanfu Shen, Yongzhen Huang, and Shiqi Yu. Gaitedge: Beyond plain end-to-end gait recognition for better practi- cality. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2022: 17th Eu- ropean Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23–27, 2022, Proceedings, Part V, p...

    2022

  14. [21]

    Pose-based temporal-spatial network (ptsn) for gait recognition with carrying and clothing variations

    Rijun Liao, Chunshui Cao, Edel B Garcia, Shiqi Yu, and Yongzhen Huang. Pose-based temporal-spatial network (ptsn) for gait recognition with carrying and clothing variations. In Biometric Recognition: 12th Chinese Conference, CCBR 2017, Shenzhen, China, October 28-29, 2017, Pro...

    2017

  15. [22]

    Simple and efficient pose-based gait recog- nition method for challenging environments

    V ´ ıtor C de Lima, Victor HC Melo, and William R Schwartz. Simple and efficient pose-based gait recog- nition method for challenging environments. Pattern Analysis and Applications , 24:497–507, 2021. 3

    2021

  16. [23]

    Gait Recog- nition via Effective Global-Local Feature Represen- tation and Local Temporal Aggregation

    Beibei Lin, Shunli Zhang, and Xin Yu. Gait Recog- nition via Effective Global-Local Feature Represen- tation and Local Temporal Aggregation. In 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages 14628–14636, Montreal, QC, Canada, Oct. 2021. IEEE. 2, 3, 5, 7

    2021

  17. [24]

    A survey on gait recognition via wearable sensors

    Maria De Marsico and Alessio Mecca. A survey on gait recognition via wearable sensors. 52(4), aug

  18. [25]

    Pose-guided feature alignment for oc- cluded person re-identification

    Jiaxu Miao, Yu Wu, Ping Liu, Yuhang Ding, and Yi Yang. Pose-guided feature alignment for oc- cluded person re-identification. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vi- sion, pages 542–551, 2019. 3

    2019

  19. [26]

    Identifying Vis- ible Parts via Pose Estimation for Occluded Person Re-Identification

    Jiaxu Miao, Yu Wu, and Yi Yang. Identifying Vis- ible Parts via Pose Estimation for Occluded Person Re-Identification. IEEE Transactions on Neural Net- works and Learning Systems , 33(9):4624–4634, Sept

  20. [27]

    Temporal 3d shape modeling for video-based cloth-changing person re-identification

    Vuong D Nguyen, Pranav Mantini, and Shishir K Shah. Temporal 3d shape modeling for video-based cloth-changing person re-identification. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Ap- plications of Computer Vision , pages 173–182, 2024. 3

    2024

  21. [28]

    Uniqueness of gait kinematics in a cohort study

    Gunwoo Park, Kyoung Min Lee, and Seungbum Koo. Uniqueness of gait kinematics in a cohort study. Scientific Reports, 11(1):15248, 2021. 1

    2021

  22. [30]

    Deep learning- based occluded person re-identification: A survey,

    Yunjie Peng, Saihui Hou, Chunshui Cao, Xu Liu, Yongzhen Huang, and Zhiqiang He. Deep learning- based occluded person re-identification: A survey,

  23. [31]

    Data distillation: To- wards omni-supervised learning

    Ilija Radosavovic, Piotr Doll´ ar, Ross Girshick, Geor- gia Gkioxari, and Kaiming He. Data distillation: To- wards omni-supervised learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 4119–4128, 2018. 4

    2018

  24. [32]

    A comprehensive survey on deep gait recognition: algorithms, datasets and challenges

    Chuanfu Shen, Shiqi Yu, Jilong Wang, George Q Huang, and Liang Wang. A comprehensive survey on deep gait recognition: algorithms, datasets and challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.13732 , 2022. 2

    2022 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Hybrid neural network model for reconstruction of occluded regions in multi-gait scenario

    Jasvinder Pal Singh, Sanjeev Jain, Uday Pratap Singh, and Sakshi Arora. Hybrid neural network model for reconstruction of occluded regions in multi-gait scenario. Multimedia Tools and Applica- tions, 81(7):9607–9629, 2022. 2, 3

    2022

  26. [34]

    Spatio- temporal silhouette sequence reconstruction for gait recognition against occlusion

    Md Uddin, Daigo Muramatsu, Noriko Takemura, Md Ahad, Atiqur Rahman, Yasushi Yagi, et al. Spatio- temporal silhouette sequence reconstruction for gait recognition against occlusion. IPSJ Transactions on Computer Vision and Applications , 11(1):1–18,

  27. [35]

    Learning local feature de- scriptors with triplets and shallow convolutional neu- ral networks

    Daniel Ponsa Vassileios Balntas, Edgar Riba and Krystian Mikolajczyk. Learning local feature de- scriptors with triplets and shallow convolutional neu- ral networks. In Edwin R. Hancock Richard C. Wil- son and William A. P. Smith, editors, Proceedings of the British Machine Vi...

    2016

  28. [36]

    Detec- tron2

    Yuxin Wu, Alexander Kirillov, Francisco Massa, Wan-Yen Lo, and Ross Girshick. Detec- tron2. https://github.com/facebookresearch/ detectron2, 2019. 5 13

    2019

  29. [37]

    Occlusion-Aware Human Mesh Model-Based Gait Recognition

    Chi Xu, Yasushi Makihara, Xiang Li, and Yasushi Yagi. Occlusion-Aware Human Mesh Model-Based Gait Recognition. IEEE Transactions on Infor- mation Forensics and Security , 18:1309–1321, 2023. Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Informa- tion Forensics and Security. 2, 3

    2023

  30. [38]

    Occluded gait recognition via silhouette registration guided by automated oc- clusion degree estimation

    Chi Xu, Shogo Tsuji, Yasushi Makihara, Xiang Li, and Yasushi Yagi. Occluded gait recognition via silhouette registration guided by automated oc- clusion degree estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) Workshops , pages 3199–...

    2023

  31. [39]

    Deep learning for person re-identification: A survey and outlook

    Mang Ye, Jianbing Shen, Gaojie Lin, Tao Xiang, Ling Shao, and Steven CH Hoi. Deep learning for person re-identification: A survey and outlook. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intel- ligence, 44(6):2872–2893, 2021. 3

    2021

  32. [40]

    A frame- work for evaluating the effect of view angle, cloth- ing and carrying condition on gait recognition

    Shiqi Yu, Daoliang Tan, and Tieniu Tan. A frame- work for evaluating the effect of view angle, cloth- ing and carrying condition on gait recognition. In 18th international conference on pattern recognition (ICPR’06), volume 4, pages 441–444. IEEE, 2006. 3

    2006

  33. [41]

    Spatial transformer network on skeleton-based gait recognition

    Cun Zhang, Xing-Peng Chen, Guo-Qiang Han, and Xiang-Jie Liu. Spatial transformer network on skeleton-based gait recognition. Expert Systems , 40(6):e13244, 2023. 3

    2023

  34. [42]

    Gait recognition via disentangled representation learn- ing

    Ziyuan Zhang, Luan Tran, Xi Yin, Yousef Atoum, Xiaoming Liu, Jian Wan, and Nanxin Wang. Gait recognition via disentangled representation learn- ing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 4710–4719, 2019. 3

    2019

  35. [43]

    Gait recognition in the wild with dense 3d representations and a bench- mark

    Jinkai Zheng, Xinchen Liu, Wu Liu, Lingxiao He, Chenggang Yan, and Tao Mei. Gait recognition in the wild with dense 3d representations and a bench- mark. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2022. 2, 3, 6, 8

    2022

  36. [44]

    Gait recognition using 3-d human body shape infer- ence

    Haidong Zhu, Zhaoheng Zheng, and Ram Nevatia. Gait recognition using 3-d human body shape infer- ence. pages 909–918, 01 2023. 4

    2023

  37. [45]

    Gait recognition in the wild: A bench- mark

    Zheng Zhu, Xianda Guo, Tian Yang, Junjie Huang, Jiankang Deng, Guan Huang, Dalong Du, Jiwen Lu, and Jie Zhou. Gait recognition in the wild: A bench- mark. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages 14789–14799,

  38. [46]

    Occluded person re-identification

    Jiaxuan Zhuo, Zeyu Chen, Jianhuang Lai, and Guangcong Wang. Occluded person re-identification. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Multime- dia and Expo (ICME) , pages 1–6. IEEE, 2018. 3 14 MimicGait: A Model Agnostic approach for Occluded Gait Recognition using Correlati...

    2018

  39. [47]

    The portion of the frame to be cropped out is chosen randomly from the fixed range R

    bottom occlusion, where the legs and lower body may be occluded, and 3) middle occlusions, where the middle part of the body is occluded. The portion of the frame to be cropped out is chosen randomly from the fixed range R. In dynamic and middle occlusions, the occlusion patch...

  40. [48]

    with a learning rate of 1e-4. During training, the classification loss Lce and the regression loss Lr are multiplied by loss weights λce and λr to calculate the final loss L for the backward pass as shown below L = λceLce + λrLr (4) Empirically, we find that setting λce = 1 .0...

  41. [49]

    is used for training, meaning that each batch of training data has 32 identities and 4 sequences per identity. Apart from the randomly generated synthetic oc- clusions, we also use data augmentation techniques like Random Horizontal Flipping, Random Cropping and Random Perspec...

  42. [50]

    so that we can evaluate our models locally. To evaluate our approach on synthetic occlusions, we use the same gallery-probe split from the dataset protocol but introduce synthetic occlusions in each video during the data loading stage. It should be noted that the occlusion typ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.