Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 92 references

The significance of "stripes" in the physics of the cuprates, the Hubbard model, and other highly correlated electronic systems

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This review argues that unidirectional charge-density-wave stripes are a ubiquitous ordering tendency in cuprate superconductors and Hubbard-like models, arising from local strong-correlation physics rather than Fermi-surface nesting, and…

desk verdict A solid perspective on stripes in cuprates, honest about its own unresolved central inference; useful as a review, not as a new research claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.15709 v1 pith:LFRCRXKP submitted 2025-01-27 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.supr-con

Thomas P. Devereaux , Steven A. Kivelson This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con
keywords stripeschargedensitywavecupratesuperconductorsHubbardmodelt-Jd-wavesuperconductivityMottinsulatormatrixrenormalizationgroup
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This perspective argues that stripe order — unidirectional charge-density waves, sometimes paired with spin-density waves at twice the period — is a generic ordering tendency in strongly correlated electronic systems, appearing across the cuprate phase diagram and in numerical studies of Hubbard-like models. The authors trace the idea to an early Hartree-Fock prediction of charged magnetic domain lines and assemble evidence from density-matrix renormalization group calculations, determinant quantum Monte Carlo, and X-ray and scanning tunneling experiments. They claim stripes are not a weak-coupling Fermi-surface nesting effect but reflect local physics similar to phase separation in a doped antiferromagnet. If the claim is right, any theory of high-temperature superconductivity in the cuprates must treat stripe order as a central competing phase rather than a material-specific footnote.

What carries the argument

The central object is the stripe: a unidirectional charge-density wave, often accompanied by a spin-density wave with twice the period. The paper's argument is carried by the recurrence of this object in independent numerical techniques and in scattering experiments across cuprate families. The underlying mechanism invoked is local phase separation: doped holes cluster into conducting 'partially filled' stripes separated by antiferromagnetic regions, a picture that originated in Hartree-Fock calculations and was later sharpened by phase-separation and Coulomb-frustration arguments. This local mechanism is what distinguishes stripes from weak-coupling CDW physics such as Fermi-surface nesting.

What would settle it

A concrete falsifier would be to show, in a single clean cuprate family, that the CDW wavevector and onset temperature track a phonon anomaly or oxygen-ordering wavevector rather than the doping-dependent electronic tendency, for instance by observing a large isotope shift in the CDW onset that no purely electronic Hubbard-model calculation can reproduce.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that in the range of parameters where high-temperature superconductivity arises, stripe ordering tendencies of some sort appear to be more or less ubiquitous. The supporting case is comparative: DMRG studies on Hubbard and t-J cylinders of width 2 to 8 find stripe or CDW-dominated ground states over broad parameter ranges, especially for t' ≤ 0; finite-temperature DQMC finds fluctuating stripe order in the normal state; and resonant X-ray and STM experiments report unidirectional CDW correlations in multiple cuprate families, strongest near x = 1/8 and always in competition with d-wave superconductivity. The authors argue these stripes arise from local phase separation in a doped Mott insulator rather than from Fermi-surface nesting. They also stress that weak X-ray intensities imply only small lattice displacements and hence do not measure the electronic condensation energy, leaving open whether the CDW is central or peripheral.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the various charge-density-wave orders seen experimentally in different cuprate families and the stripe orders found in Hubbard and t-J model calculations all reflect a single, shared ordering tendency rather than distinct phenomena with different physical origins, such as electron-phonon coupling.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If stripes are as ubiquitous as claimed, the two-dimensional Hubbard model is likely to have a stripe-ordered ground state over a significant part of its phase diagram, making the balance between stripe order and superconductivity essential for interpreting numerical results.
  • The competition between stripe order and d-wave superconductivity implies that parameters that weaken stripes, such as next-nearest-neighbor hopping, strain, or pressure, should systematically raise the superconducting transition temperature.
  • The suppression of superconductivity near x = 1/8 is a natural consequence of stripe order winning at that doping, so the paper implies the 1/8 anomaly is intrinsic to strong-correlation physics rather than accidental material chemistry.
  • The small ionic displacements measured in cuprate CDW experiments do not imply a small electronic condensation energy; the electronic order can be thermodynamically significant while the lattice barely moves.
  • The pseudogap and anomalous normal state may be viewed as a regime of fluctuating stripe correlations, consistent with DQMC results showing stripe fluctuations at temperatures of order the exchange energy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extension: If stripe suppression reliably raises Tc, then computational screening of Hubbard-model parameters (t', U, next-nearest hopping) could identify candidate materials or strain directions that maximize superconductivity by tuning away from stripe order.
  • Extension: The paper's open question about phonons suggests a concrete numerical experiment: adding bond-stretching electron-phonon coupling to DMRG or DQMC studies of the Hubbard model should show whether the stripe period locks to a lattice wavevector, connecting the electronic and lattice pictures.
  • Extension: The claim that CDW condensation energy is not reflected in lattice displacements implies that thermodynamic measurements across the CDW onset in cuprates should reveal an electronic entropy release comparable to superconductivity; if none is found, the 'central order' view is weakened.
  • Extension: If stripes are local phase separation, the normal state above Tc should exhibit slow, glassy dynamics of stripe domains; time-resolved X-ray or noise measurements could test this prediction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a perspective article in honor of Jan Zaanen, arguing that unidirectional charge-density-wave ('stripe') order is a ubiquitous ordering tendency across the cuprate phase diagram and in numerical studies of Hubbard-like models. The authors review experimental evidence for CDW order in multiple cuprate families and numerical DMRG, DQMC, and other results in the Hubbard and t-J models, and discuss whether these stripes are driven by local physics rather than Fermi-surface nesting. The paper concludes with a series of open questions about whether different experimental density-wave orders reflect a single tendency, whether they share a common origin with theoretical stripes, and whether stripes are central to cuprate physics.

Significance. If the central claim is accepted, stripe order would be elevated from a material-specific detail to a key competing order in the cuprate phase diagram and in strongly correlated model systems, with implications for the mechanism of high-temperature superconductivity. The paper provides a useful synthesis of a large literature and is notably honest in acknowledging conflicting numerical results and unresolved experimental-theoretical correspondence. It offers no new calculations, but its value lies in the perspective and the explicit formulation of open questions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that in the Hubbard model stripes 'often appear as an alternative order that can out-compete the otherwise favored d-wave superconductivity,' but the body ('Stripes in Hubbard-Like Models') reports conflicting width-8 DMRG results (Refs. [41-44]) and concludes that 'results are not yet conclusive as to whether (and in what range of parameters) the Hubbard or t-J model is dominantly superconducting or CDW ordered in the 2D limit.' Please revise the abstract to include this caveat and to indicate that the competition is parameter- and method-dependent.
  2. [Stripes in perspective] The paper explicitly leaves open the question of whether the density-wave orders seen experimentally reflect a single ordering tendency and whether they are related to the stripes seen in purely electronic model calculations (questions 1 and 2). Given that the paper itself notes that the decreasing experimental CDW wavevector with hole doping in BSCCO and YBCO has 'no clear analog from DMRG' and that phonons may play a critical role, the central claim of ubiquity should be framed more cautiously in the title, abstract, and introduction. I recommend stating that the ubiquity refers to ordering tendencies in separate contexts, not necessarily a demonstrated common mechanism.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction] The expression 'V /greaterorsimilarEF' appears to be a LaTeX artifact; it should read 'V \gtrsim E_F'.
  2. [References] Reference [40] is incomplete: the title is truncated ('...interpla') and the publication venue is missing; please complete the entry.
  3. [Coda] The word 'phenonena' should be spelled 'phenomena'.
  4. [Stripes in perspective] The phrase 'the observance of a decreasing wavevector' is awkward; 'the observation' would be clearer.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper is a qualitative perspective whose central claim rests on independent experimental and numerical evidence, not on its own fitted inputs or self-referential derivation.

full rationale

This paper is not a derivation but a perspective/commentary. Its central claim—that stripe ordering tendencies are ubiquitous in cuprates and Hubbard-like models and are not driven by Fermi-surface nesting—is supported by external experimental discoveries (e.g., Tranquada et al., Ref. 53), independent numerical simulations (White & Scalapino, Refs. 16–17; Zheng et al., Ref. 32; the Simons Collaboration, Ref. 23; and many others), and general theoretical arguments about local phase separation. The authors do cite several of their own DQMC and DMRG works (e.g., Refs. 27–28, 35–36, 46–48), but these are ordinary self-citations of published numerical results, and the same conclusions are corroborated by non-overlapping groups. No parameter is fitted and then renamed a prediction; no equation reduces to another by construction; and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported solely from self-authored prior work. The paper explicitly flags its own open questions in 'Stripes in perspective,' including whether experimental density-wave orders share a single origin and whether they correspond to the theoretical stripe orders; it even concedes that the decreasing experimental CDW wavevector with doping 'has no clear analog from DMRG on the Hubbard model.' These are honest limitations, not circular logic. The claim that stripes are ubiquitous is presented as an interpretive synthesis of a large body of independent evidence, with the unresolved identification between model stripes and cuprate charge order openly acknowledged. Therefore there is no significant circularity, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The note introduces no new free parameters or invented entities. Its argument rests on a set of interpretive assumptions taken from the cited literature, listed above.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption d-wave cuprate superconductivity is understandable via the BCS gap equation with a strongly k-dependent but weakly retarded repulsion that reflects short-range antiferromagnetic correlations.
    Invoked in the introduction to argue superconductivity and stripe order can coexist as competing tendencies in the same strong-coupling framework.
  • domain assumption CDW order in more than one dimension requires intermediate scale interactions V ~ EF and is not generically driven by Fermi surface nesting.
    Central to the paper's rejection of weak-coupling nesting explanations; based on references [9-11].
  • domain assumption The Hubbard model, though not a realistic model of the cuprates, teaches about cuprate physics because these systems share enough common ordering tendencies.
    Justifies applying Hubbard model numerics to cuprate phenomenology in the section "Stripes in Hubbard-Like Models".
  • domain assumption Finite-cylinder DMRG and DQMC results on stripes are informative about the two-dimensional bulk ordering tendencies.
    The paper uses these numerics as evidence while acknowledging finite-width and boundary condition limitations.
  • domain assumption Stripes can be viewed as local phase separation between hole-rich metallic regions and antiferromagnetic insulating regions.
    Interpretive framework from Zaanen and Emery-Kivelson that organizes the discussion.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The significance of "stripes" in the physics of the cuprates, the Hubbard model, and other highly correlated electronic systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LFRCRXKP

@misc{pith2026250115709,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The significance of "stripes" in the physics of the cuprates, the Hubbard model, and other highly correlated electronic systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LFRCRXKP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.15709}
}
abstract

"Stripes" - meaning unidirectional charge-density-waves, sometimes (but not always) accompanied by spin-density-waves with twice the period - are now known to arise in broad swathes of the cuprate phase diagram, and appear as a strong ordering tendency in numerical studies of Hubbard-like models of highly correlated electron systems. Jan Zaanen's work played a seminal role in predicting their existence, and exploring their possible significance. They are {\it not} related to any weak-coupling physics associated with some form of Fermi-surface nesting. And whether one likes them or not, they are surprisingly difficult to avoid; in the Hubbard model, for example, they often appear as an alternative order that can out-compete the otherwise favored $d$-wave superconductivity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Zaanen and O

    J. Zaanen and O. Gunnarsson, Charged magnetic do- main lines and the magnetism of high- Tc oxides, Phys. Rev. B 40, 7391 (1989)

    1989

  2. [2]

    H. J. Schulz, Superconductivity and Antiferromagnetism in the Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model: Scaling The- ory, Europhysics Letters 4, 609 (1987)

    1987

  3. [3]

    H. J. Schulz, Incommensurate antiferromag- netism in the two-dimensional Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1445 (1990)

    1990

  4. [4]

    Machida, Magnetism in La2CuO4 based compounds, Physica C: Superconductivity 158, 192 (1989)

    K. Machida, Magnetism in La2CuO4 based compounds, Physica C: Superconductivity 158, 192 (1989)

    1989

  5. [5]

    Poilblanc and T

    D. Poilblanc and T. M. Rice, Charged solitons in the Hartree-Fock approximation to the large-U Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 39, 9749 (1989)

    1989

  6. [6]

    Inui and P

    M. Inui and P. B. Littlewood, Hartree-Fock study of the magnetism in the single-band Hubbard model, 6 Phys. Rev. B 44, 4415 (1991)

    1991

  7. [7]

    D. J. Scalapino, A common thread: The pair- ing interaction for unconventional superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1383 (2012)

    2012

  8. [8]

    Keimer, S

    B. Keimer, S. A. Kivelson, M. R. Norman, S. Uchida, and J. Zaanen, From quantum matter to high- temperature superconductivity in copper oxides, Nature 518, 179 (2015)

    2015

Show all 92 references
  1. [9]

    M. D. Johannes and I. I. Mazin, Fermi surface nest- ing and the origin of charge density waves in metals, Phys. Rev. B 77, 165135 (2008)

    2008

  2. [10]

    Eiter, M

    H.-M. Eiter, M. Lavagnini, R. Hackl, E. A. Nowadnick, A. F. Kemper, T. P. Devereaux, J.-H. Chu, J. G. Analytis, I. R. Fisher, and L. Degiorgi, Alternative route to charge density wave formation in multiband systems, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, 64 (2013)

    2013

  3. [11]

    Esterlis, S

    I. Esterlis, S. A. Kivelson, and D. J. Scalapino, Pseudogap crossover in the electron-phonon system, Phys. Rev. B 99, 174516 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    P. W. Anderson, The Resonating Valence Bond State in La 2CuO4 and Superconductivity, Science 235, 1196 (1987)

    1987

  5. [13]

    V. J. Emery, Theory of high-T c superconductivity in ox- ides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2794 (1987)

    1987

  6. [14]

    V. J. Emery and S. A. Kivelson, Superconductivity in Bad Metals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3253 (1995)

    1995

  7. [15]

    L¨ ow, V

    U. L¨ ow, V. J. Emery, K. Fabricius, and S. A. Kivelson, Study of an Ising model with competing long- and short- range interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1918 (1994)

    1994

  8. [16]

    S. R. White and D. J. Scalapino, Ground states of the doped four-leg t − J ladder, Phys. Rev. B 55, R14701 (1997)

    1997

  9. [17]

    S. R. White and D. J. Scalapino, Density Matrix Renor- malization Group Study of the Striped Phase in the 2D t − J Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1272 (1998)

    1998

  10. [18]

    Zaanen, Current Ideas on the Origin of Stripes, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 59, 1769 (1998)

    J. Zaanen, Current Ideas on the Origin of Stripes, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 59, 1769 (1998)

    1998

  11. [19]

    D. P. Arovas, E. Berg, S. A. Kivel- son, and S. Raghu, The Hubbard Model, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 13, 239 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    V. I. Iglovikov, E. Khatami, and R. T. Scalettar, Geom- etry dependence of the sign problem in quantum Monte Carlo simulations, Phys. Rev. B 92, 045110 (2015)

    2015

  13. [21]

    M. Qin, T. Sch¨ afer, S. Andergassen, P. Corboz, and E. Gull, The Hubbard Model: A Computational Perspective, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 13, 275 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    Corboz, T

    P. Corboz, T. M. Rice, and M. Troyer, Competing States in the t-J Model: Uniform d-Wave State versus Stripe State, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 046402 (2014)

    2014

  15. [23]

    J. P. F. LeBlanc, A. E. Antipov, F. Becca, I. W. Bu- lik, G. K.-L. Chan, C.-M. Chung, Y. Deng, M. Ferrero, T. M. Henderson, C. A. Jim´ enez-Hoyos, E. Kozik, X.- W. Liu, A. J. Millis, N. V. Prokof’ev, M. Qin, G. E. Scuseria, H. Shi, B. V. Svistunov, L. F. Tocchio, I. S. Tupitsy...

    2015

  16. [24]

    Corboz, Improved energy extrapolation with infinite projected entangled-pair states ap- plied to the two-dimensional Hubbard model, Phys

    P. Corboz, Improved energy extrapolation with infinite projected entangled-pair states ap- plied to the two-dimensional Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 93, 045116 (2016)

    2016

  17. [25]

    Stoudenmire and S

    E. Stoudenmire and S. R. White, Study- ing Two-Dimensional Systems with the Density Matrix Renormalization Group, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 3, 111 (2012)

    2012

  18. [26]

    J. F. Dodaro, H.-C. Jiang, and S. A. Kivelson, Inter- twined order in a frustrated four-leg t − J cylinder, Phys. Rev. B 95, 155116 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    Jiang, J

    Y.-F. Jiang, J. Zaanen, T. P. Devereaux, and H.-C. Jiang, Ground state phase diagram of the doped Hubbard model on the four-leg cylinder, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033073 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    Jiang, T

    Y.-F. Jiang, T. P. Devereaux, and H.-C. Jiang, Ground- state phase diagram and superconductivity of the doped Hubbard model on six-leg square cylinders, Phys. Rev. B 109, 085121 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    D. Wu, R. Rossi, F. Vicentini, N. Astrakhantsev, F. Becca, X. Cao, J. Carrasquilla, F. Ferrari, A. Georges, M. Hibat-Allah, M. Imada, A. M. L¨ auchli, G. Mazzola, A. Mezzacapo, A. Millis, J. R. Moreno, T. Neupert, Y. Nomura, J. Nys, O. Parcollet, R. Pohle, I. Romero, M. Schmid...

    2024

  22. [30]

    Jiang, D

    S. Jiang, D. J. Scalapino, and S. R. White, Density matrix renormalization group based downfolding of the three-band Hubbard model: Importance of density- assisted hopping, Phys. Rev. B 108, L161111 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Lu, D.-W

    X. Lu, D.-W. Qu, Y. Qi, W. Li, and S.-S. Gong, Ground- state phase diagram of the extended two-leg t− J ladder, Phys. Rev. B 107, 125114 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    Zheng, C.-M

    B.-X. Zheng, C.-M. Chung, P. Corboz, G. Ehlers, M.-P. Qin, R. M. Noack, H. Shi, S. R. White, S. Zhang, and G. K.-L. Chan, Stripe order in the un- derdoped region of the two-dimensional Hubbard model, Science 358, 1155 (2017)

    2017

  25. [33]

    Ehlers, S

    G. Ehlers, S. R. White, and R. M. Noack, Hybrid- space density matrix renormalization group study of the doped two-dimensional Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 95, 125125 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    Qin, C.-M

    M. Qin, C.-M. Chung, H. Shi, E. Vitali, C. Hubig, U. Schollw¨ ock, S. R. White, and S. Zhang (Simons Col- laboration on the Many-Electron Problem), Absence of Superconductivity in the Pure Two-Dimensional Hub- bard Model, Phys. Rev. X 10, 031016 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    Jiang and T

    H.-C. Jiang and T. P. Devereaux, Superconductivity in the doped Hubbard model and its interplay with next- nearest hopping t ′, Science 365, 1424 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    C. Peng, Y. Wang, J. Wen, Y. S. Lee, T. P. Dev- ereaux, and H.-C. Jiang, Enhanced superconductivity by near-neighbor attraction in the doped extended Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 107, L201102 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    Jiang, Z.-Y

    H.-C. Jiang, Z.-Y. Weng, and S. A. Kivelson, Supercon- ductivity in the doped t − J model: Results for four-leg cylinders, Phys. Rev. B 98, 140505 (2018)

    2018

  30. [38]

    Hager, G

    G. Hager, G. Wellein, E. Jeckelmann, and H. Fehske, Stripe formation in doped Hubbard ladders, Phys. Rev. B 71, 075108 (2005)

    2005

  31. [39]

    S. Gong, W. Zhu, and D. N. Sheng, Robust d-Wave Superconductivity in the Square-Lattice t− J Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 097003 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    Xu, H.-C

    Z. Xu, H.-C. Jiang, and Y.-F. Jiang, Superconductivity enhancement and particle-hole asymmet ry: interpla (2024), arXiv:2402.11255. 7

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Jiang, D

    S. Jiang, D. J. Scalapino, and S. R. White, Pairing properties of the t − t′ − J model, Phys. Rev. B 106, 174507 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    Jiang, D

    S. Jiang, D. J. Scalapino, and S. R. White, Ground- state phase diagram of the t − t′ − J model, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2109978118 (2021)

    2021

  35. [43]

    X. Lu, F. Chen, W. Zhu, D. N. Sheng, and S.- S. Gong, Emergent Superconductivity and Competing Charge Orders in Hole-Doped Square-Lattice t− J Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 066002 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    F. Chen, F. D. M. Haldane, and D. N. Sheng, D-Wave and Pair-Density-Wave Superconductivity in the Squ are-Lattice t-J Model (2023), arXiv:2311.15092 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    2023 arXiv

  37. [45]

    S. R. White, D. J. Scalapino, R. L. Sugar, E. Y. Loh, J. E. Gubernatis, and R. T. Scalettar, Nu- merical study of the two-dimensional Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 40, 506 (1989)

    1989

  38. [46]

    E. W. Huang, C. B. Mendl, S. Liu, S. Johnston, H.-C. Jiang, B. Moritz, and T. P. Devereaux, Numerical evi- dence of fluctuating stripes in the normal state of high- Tc cuprate superconductors, Science 358, 1161 (2017)

    2017

  39. [47]

    E. W. Huang, C. B. Mendl, H.-C. Jiang, B. Moritz, and T. P. Devereaux, Stripe order from the perspective of the Hubbard model, npj Quantum Materials 3, 22 (2018)

    2018

  40. [48]

    E. W. Huang, W. O. Wang, J. K. Ding, T. Liu, F. Liu, X.- X. Huang, B. Moritz, and T. P. Devereaux, Intertwined States at Finite Temperatures in the Hubbard Model, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 90, 111010 (2021)

    2021

  41. [49]

    T. A. Maier, M. Jarrell, T. C. Schulthess, P. R. C. Kent, and J. B. White, Systematic Study of d-Wave Su- perconductivity in the 2D Repulsive Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 237001 (2005)

    2005

  42. [50]

    E. Gull, O. Parcollet, and A. J. Millis, Superconductiv- ity and the Pseudogap in the Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 216405 (2013)

    2013

  43. [51]

    Xu, C.-M

    H. Xu, C.-M. Chung, M. Qin, U. Schollw¨ ock, S. R. White, and S. Zhang, Coexistence of superconductiv- ity with partially filled stripes in the Hubbard model, Science 384, eadh7691 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    P. Mai, S. Karakuzu, G. Balduzzi, S. John- ston, and T. A. Maier, Intertwined spin, charge, and pair correlations in the two-dimensional Hubbard model in the thermodynamic limit, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, e2112806119 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    J. M. Tranquada, B. J. Sternlieb, J. D. Axe, Y. Naka- mura, and S. Uchida, Evidence for stripe correlations of spins and holes in copper oxide superconductors, Nature 375, 561 (1995)

    1995

  46. [54]

    Ghiringhelli, M

    G. Ghiringhelli, M. L. Tacon, M. Minola, S. Blanco- Canosa, C. Mazzoli, N. B. Brookes, G. M. D. Luca, A. Frano, D. G. Hawthorn, F. He, T. Loew, M. M. Sala, D. C. Peets, M. Salluzzo, E. Schierle, R. Sutarto, G. A. Sawatzky, E. Weschke, B. Keimer, and L. Braicovich, Long-Range I...

    2012

  47. [55]

    Comin and A

    R. Comin and A. Damascelli, Resonant X-Ray Scattering Studies of Charge Order in Cuprates, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 7, 369 (2016)

    2016

  48. [56]

    Chang, E

    J. Chang, E. Blackburn, A. T. Holmes, N. B. Chris- tensen, J. Larsen, J. Mesot, R. Liang, D. A. Bonn, W. N. Hardy, A. Watenphul, M. v. Zimmermann, E. M. Forgan, and S. M. Hayden, Direct observation of competition be- tween superconductivity and charge density wave order in YBa...

    2012

  49. [57]

    Arpaia and G

    R. Arpaia and G. Ghiringhelli, Charge Order at High Temperature in Cuprate Superconductors, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 90, 111005 (2021)

    2021

  50. [58]

    E. H. da Silva Neto, A. Frano, and F. Boschini, Dynamic charge order from strong correlations in the cuprates, Frontiers in Electronic Materials 4, 10.3389/femat.2024.1473324 (2024)

    2024

  51. [59]

    S. M. Hayden and J. M. Tranquada, Charge Correlations in Cuprate Superconductors, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 15, 215 (2024)

    2024

  52. [60]

    J. E. Hoffman, E. W. Hudson, K. M. Lang, V. Mad- havan, H. Eisaki, S. Uchida, and J. C. Davis, A Four Unit Cell Periodic Pattern of Quasi-Particle States Surrounding Vortex Cores in Bi 2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ , Science 295, 466 (2002)

    2002

  53. [61]

    Vershinin, S

    M. Vershinin, S. Misra, S. Ono, Y. Abe, Y. Ando, and A. Yazdani, Local Ordering in the Pseudogap State of the High- c Superconductor Bi 2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ , Science 303, 1995 (2004)

    2004

  54. [62]

    Hanaguri, C

    T. Hanaguri, C. Lupien, Y. Kohsaka, D.-H. Lee, M. Azuma, M. Takano, H. Takagi, and J. C. Davis, A ‘checkerboard’ electronic crystal state in lightly hole- doped Ca 2−xNaxCuO2Cl2, Nature 430, 1001 (2004)

    2004

  55. [63]

    W. D. Wise, M. C. Boyer, K. Chatterjee, T. Kondo, T. Takeuchi, H. Ikuta, Y. Wang, and E. W. Hud- son, Charge-density-wave origin of cuprate checker- board visualized by scanning tunnelling microscopy, Nature Physics 4, 696 (2008)

    2008

  56. [64]

    Fujita, A

    K. Fujita, A. R. Schmidt, E.-A. Kim, M. J. Lawler, D. Hai Lee, J. C. Davis, H. Eisaki, and S.-i. Uchida, Spec- troscopic Imaging Scanning Tunneling Microscopy Stud- ies of Electronic Structure in the Superconducting and Pseudogap Phases of Cuprate High-Tc Superconductors, Jour...

    2012

  57. [65]

    L. Nie, A. V. Maharaj, E. Fradkin, and S. A. Kivelson, Vestigial nematicity from spin and/or charge order in the cuprates, Phys. Rev. B 96, 085142 (2017)

    2017

  58. [66]

    J. M. Tranquada, D. J. Buttrey, V. Sachan, and J. E. Lorenzo, Simultaneous Ordering of Holes and Spins in La2NiO4. 125, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1003 (1994)

    1994

  59. [67]

    Z. Sun, Q. Wang, A. V. Fedorov, H. Zheng, J. F. Mitchell, and D. S. Dessau, Localization of electrons due to orbitally ordered bi-stripes in the bilayer manganite La 2−2xSr1+2xMn2O7, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 11799 (2011)

    2011

  60. [68]

    C. N. R. Rao and A. K. Cheetham, Charge Ordering in Manganates, Science 276, 911 (1997)

    1997

  61. [69]

    J. M. Tranquada, K. Nakajima, M. Braden, L. Pintschovius, and R. J. McQueeney, Bond-Stretching- Phonon Anomalies in Stripe-Ordered La 1. 69Sr0. 31NiO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 075505 (2002)

    2002

  62. [70]

    Reichardt and M

    W. Reichardt and M. Braden, Anomalous features in the bond stretching vibrations of La 1−xSrxMnO3, Physica B: Condensed Matter 263-264, 416 (1999)

    1999

  63. [71]

    Pintschovius, W

    L. Pintschovius, W. Reichardt, M. Braden, G. Dhalenne, and A. Revcolevschi, Lattice dynam- ics of stoichiometric and nonstoichiometric La 2NiO4, Phys. Rev. B 64, 094510 (2001)

    2001

  64. [72]

    Reichardt, Cu-O bond-stretching vibrations in YBa2Cu3O7 studied by inelastic neutron scattering, Journal of Low Temperature Physics 105, 807 (1996)

    W. Reichardt, Cu-O bond-stretching vibrations in YBa2Cu3O7 studied by inelastic neutron scattering, Journal of Low Temperature Physics 105, 807 (1996)

    1996

  65. [73]

    Pintschovius and M

    L. Pintschovius and M. Braden, Anomalous dis- persion of LO phonons in La 1. 85Sr0. 15CuO4, Phys. Rev. B 60, R15039 (1999) . 8

    1999

  66. [74]

    Reznik, Phonon anomalies and dynamic stripes, Physica C: Superconductivity 481, 75 (2012)

    D. Reznik, Phonon anomalies and dynamic stripes, Physica C: Superconductivity 481, 75 (2012)

    2012

  67. [75]

    J. A. Sobota, Y. He, and Z.-X. Shen, Angle- resolved photoemission studies of quantum materials, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025006 (2021)

    2021

  68. [76]

    T. Cuk, D. H. Lu, X. J. Zhou, Z.-X. Shen, T. P. Devereaux, and N. Nagaosa, A review of elec- tron–phonon coupling seen in the high-Tc superconduc- tors by angle-resolved photoemission studies (ARPES), physica status solidi (b) 242, 11 (2005)

    2005

  69. [77]

    Meevasana, N

    W. Meevasana, N. J. C. Ingle, D. H. Lu, J. R. Shi, F. Baumberger, K. M. Shen, W. S. Lee, T. Cuk, H. Eisaki, T. P. Devereaux, N. Nagaosa, J. Zaa- nen, and Z.-X. Shen, Doping Dependence of the Cou- pling of Electrons to Bosonic Modes in the Single- Layer High-Temperature Bi 2Sr2...

    2006

  70. [78]

    Meevasana, T

    W. Meevasana, T. P. Devereaux, N. Nagaosa, Z.-X. Shen, and J. Zaanen, Calculation of overdamped c-axis charge dynamics and the coupling to polar phonons in cuprate superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 74, 174524 (2006)

    2006

  71. [79]

    K. M. Shen, F. Ronning, D. H. Lu, W. S. Lee, N. J. C. Ingle, W. Meevasana, F. Baumberger, A. Dam- ascelli, N. P. Armitage, L. L. Miller, Y. Kohsaka, M. Azuma, M. Takano, H. Takagi, and Z.-X. Shen, Miss- ing Quasiparticles and the Chemical Potential Puzzle in the Doping Evoluti...

    2004

  72. [80]

    W. S. Lee, S. Johnston, T. P. Devereaux, and Z.- X. Shen, Aspects of electron-phonon self-energy re- vealed from angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B 75, 195116 (2007)

    2007

  73. [81]

    Hashimoto, R.-H

    M. Hashimoto, R.-H. He, K. Tanaka, J.-P. Testaud, W. Meevasana, R. G. Moore, D. Lu, H. Yao, Y. Yoshida, H. Eisaki, T. P. Devereaux, Z. Hussain, and Z.-X. Shen, Particle–hole symmetry breaking in the pseudogap state of Bi2201, Nature Physics 6, 414 (2010)

    2010

  74. [82]

    Hashimoto, E

    M. Hashimoto, E. A. Nowadnick, R.-H. He, I. M. Vishik, B. Moritz, Y. He, K. Tanaka, R. G. Moore, D. Lu, Y. Yoshida, M. Ishikado, T. Sasagawa, K. Fu- jita, S. Ishida, S. Uchida, H. Eisaki, Z. Hussain, T. P. Devereaux, and Z.-X. Shen, Direct spectro- scopic evidence for phase co...

    2015

  75. [83]

    Y. He, M. Hashimoto, D. Song, S.-D. Chen, J. He, I. M. Vishik, B. Moritz, D.-H. Lee, N. Nagaosa, J. Zaa- nen, T. P. Devereaux, Y. Yoshida, H. Eisaki, D. H. Lu, and Z.-X. Shen, Rapid change of superconductivity and electron-phonon coupling through critical doping in Bi- 2212, S...

    2018

  76. [84]

    N. Ru, C. L. Condron, G. Y. Margulis, K. Y. Shin, J. Laverock, S. B. Dugdale, M. F. Toney, and I. R. Fisher, Effect of chemical pressure on the charge den- sity wave transition in rare-earth tritellurides RTe3, Phys. Rev. B 77, 035114 (2008)

    2008

  77. [85]

    Siddique, C

    S. Siddique, C. Chowde Gowda, S. Demiss, R. Tromer, S. Paul, K. K. Sadasivuni, E. F. Olu, A. Chandra, V. Kochat, D. S. Galv˜ ao, P. Kumbhakar, R. Mishra, P. M. Ajayan, and C. Sekhar Tiwary, Emerging two- dimensional tellurides, Materials Today 51, 402 (2021)

    2021

  78. [86]

    Gerber, H

    S. Gerber, H. Jang, H. Nojiri, S. Matsuzawa, H. Ya- sumura, D. A. Bonn, R. Liang, W. N. Hardy, Z. Islam, A. Mehta, S. Song, M. Sikorski, D. Stefanescu, Y. Feng, S. A. Kivelson, T. P. Devereaux, Z.-X. Shen, C.-C. Kao, W.-S. Lee, D. Zhu, and J.-S. Lee, Three-dimensional charge d...

    2015

  79. [87]

    Chang, E

    J. Chang, E. Blackburn, O. Ivashko, A. T. Holmes, N. B. Christensen, M. H¨ ucker, R. Liang, D. A. Bonn, W. N. Hardy, U. R¨ utt, M. v. Zimmermann, E. M. For- gan, and S. M. Hayden, Magnetic field controlled charge density wave coupling in underdoped YBa 2Cu3O6+x, Nature Communic...

    2016

  80. [88]

    Jang, W.-S

    H. Jang, W.-S. Lee, H. Nojiri, S. Matsuzawa, H. Ya- sumura, L. Nie, A. V. Maharaj, S. Gerber, Y.-J. Liu, A. Mehta, D. A. Bonn, R. Liang, W. N. Hardy, C. A. Burns, Z. Islam, S. Song, J. Hastings, T. P. Devereaux, Z.-X. Shen, S. A. Kivelson, C.-C. Kao, D. Zhu, and J.-S. Lee, Ide...

    2016

  81. [89]

    H.-H. Kim, S. M. Souliou, M. E. Barber, E. Lefran¸ cois, M. Minola, M. Tortora, R. Heid, N. Nandi, R. A. Borzi, G. Garbarino, A. Bosak, J. Porras, T. Loew, M. K¨ onig, P. J. W. Moll, A. P. Mackenzie, B. Keimer, C. W. Hicks, and M. L. Tacon, Uniaxial pressure control of competi...

    2018

  82. [90]

    H.-H. Kim, E. Lefran¸ cois, K. Kummer, R. Fumagalli, N. B. Brookes, D. Betto, S. Nakata, M. Tortora, J. Por- ras, T. Loew, M. E. Barber, L. Braicovich, A. P. Mackenzie, C. W. Hicks, B. Keimer, M. Minola, and M. Le Tacon, Charge Density Waves in YBa 2Cu3O6. 67 Probed by Resonan...

    2021

  83. [91]

    J. Choi, Q. Wang, S. J¨ ohr, N. B. Christensen, J. K¨ uspert, D. Bucher, D. Biscette, M. H. Fis- cher, M. H¨ ucker, T. Kurosawa, N. Momono, M. Oda, O. Ivashko, M. v. Zimmermann, M. Janoschek, and J. Chang, Unveiling Unequivocal Charge Stripe Order in a Prototypical Cuprate Sup...

    2022

  84. [92]

    Guguchia, D

    Z. Guguchia, D. Das, G. Simutis, T. Adachi, J. K¨ uspert, N. Kitajima, M. Elender, V. Grinenko, O. Ivashko, M. v. Zimmermann, M. M¨ uller, C. Mielke, F. Hotz, C. Mudry, C. Baines, M. Bartkowiak, T. Shi- roka, Y. Koike, A. Amato, C. W. Hicks, G. D. Gu, J. M. Tranquada, H.-H. Kl...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.