Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 50 references

Low volume fraction of high-Tc superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 at 80 K and ambient pressure

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Post-annealed La3Ni2O7 single crystals show a clear diamagnetic response at about 80 K at ambient pressure, indicating filamentary superconductivity with a volume fraction within 0.2%.

desk verdict Oxygen-annealed La3Ni2O7 crystals show a reproducible 0.1–0.2% diamagnetic drop at 80 K, but without field-cooled or zero-resistance data the superconductivity claim is suggestive, not secure. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.15929 v1 pith:WZJT722T submitted 2025-01-27 cond-mat.supr-con

Mengwu Huo , Peiyue Ma , Chaoxin Huang , Xing Huang , Hualei Sun , Meng Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords La3Ni2O7bilayernickelateambientpressuresuperconductivityoxygenannealingfilamentarydiamagneticresponseRuddlesden-Poppernickelateshigh-temperature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that oxygen-annealed single crystals of the bilayer nickelate La3Ni2O7 exhibit a small but clear diamagnetic response beginning at about 80 K under ambient pressure, with a superconducting volume fraction estimated at 0.1–0.2%. Because the 80 K onset matches the transition temperature seen under high pressure, the authors argue that the same superconducting phase can be realized without pressure, though only in tiny filamentary regions. The significance is practical: if confirmed, bulk and transport studies of this high-Tc nickelate no longer require high-pressure apparatus, and the mechanism of the 80 K superconductivity can be studied at ambient conditions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing measurement is the zero-field-cooled d.c. magnetic susceptibility drop at 80 K, whose magnitude yields a superconducting volume fraction of 0.1–0.2%. The proposed physical mechanism is that annealing in high-pressure oxygen (10 MPa, 500 °C) removes oxygen vacancies, particularly at the inner apical oxygen site that mediates interlayer exchange, and that strain at the boundaries of micrometer-scale domains within the nanoscale stripe phase locally replaces external pressure, allowing the same 80 K superconducting phase that appears under pressure to nucleate in filaments.

What would settle it

A local magnetic imaging measurement on an annealed crystal that shows the 80 K drop would settle it: if no small diamagnetic regions are found, or if a non-superconducting reference sample given the same anneal shows the same drop, the claim is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors claim that annealing as-grown La3Ni2O7 single crystals in ~10 MPa oxygen at 500 °C for about 12 hours produces a zero-field-cooled magnetization drop near 80 K, which they interpret as the Meissner effect of a superconducting transition at ambient pressure. The crystals show no zero resistance; instead, resistivity falls by about 30% between 80 and 20 K and then plateaus, consistent with small superconducting islands. The estimated superconducting volume fraction is at most 0.2%, and the signal is suppressed by fields up to 1 T without shifting the transition temperature. The authors attribute the effect to filamentary superconductivity, likely localized at boundaries of micrometer-scale domains of a nanoscale stripe phase, where residual strain mimics the effect of external pressure, and they propose that high-pressure oxygen annealing reduces oxygen vacancies, especially at the inner apical oxygen site, that otherwise suppress superconductivity.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the small zero-field-cooled susceptibility drop at 80 K is caused by superconducting La3Ni2O7 regions rather than by a measurement artifact or a trace impurity phase.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Ambient-pressure studies of the 80 K superconducting phase become feasible with standard magnetic and transport probes, avoiding high-pressure cells.
  • The matching 80 K onset under pressure and at ambient pressure indicates the superconducting phase is intrinsic to the bilayer structure, rather than a different Ruddlesden–Popper phase or an impurity.
  • Oxygen stoichiometry is a critical control parameter: the filamentary signal appears after 12-hour anneals but weakens or disappears after longer or shorter anneals.
  • Local strain at domain boundaries may be sufficient to produce high-Tc superconductivity, suggesting that strain engineering could raise the superconducting volume fraction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the superconductivity is truly filamentary at domain boundaries, then growing single-domain crystals or applying controlled uniaxial strain to eliminate boundaries could test and potentially enlarge the superconducting fraction.
  • The same oxygen-annealing protocol may induce ambient-pressure superconductivity in other Ruddlesden–Popper nickelates, such as La4Ni3O10, which also superconduct under pressure.
  • A direct imaging experiment (for example, scanning SQUID or magnetic force microscopy) on an annealed crystal that shows the 80 K drop would be the cleanest way to confirm that the diamagnetic regions are localized to domain boundaries.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports that post-annealing La3Ni2O7 single crystals in 10 MPa O2 at 500 °C produces a small diamagnetic drop in zero-field-cooled (ZFC) susceptibility near 80 K in four crystals (#2–#5), with the estimated superconducting volume fraction below 0.2%, together with a broad decrease in resistivity between 80 and 20 K and a low-temperature plateau. The authors attribute this to filamentary superconductivity at ambient pressure, possibly located at micrometer-scale domain boundaries where strain mimics hydrostatic pressure, and note that zero resistance is not observed due to the low volume fraction.

Significance. If the 80 K diamagnetic response is truly a Meissner effect, this would be a notable result: ambient-pressure high-Tc superconductivity in a bulk bilayer nickelate, with the same Tc as the high-pressure phase, and a practical annealing route to pursue it. The paper has several strengths: the 80 K onset is reproducible across multiple separately annealed crystals, it matches the externally established high-pressure Tc, the signal is suppressed by fields up to 1 T, and the as-grown sample shows no such feature. These features give the claim prima facie plausibility and distinguish it from a purely fitted or circular construction. However, the central evidence is a 0.1–0.2% susceptibility downturn measured only in ZFC mode, and the resistivity data do not reach zero resistance; the superconducting interpretation therefore rests on a small set of magnetic measurements that lack the standard discriminating controls.

major comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 3 and Results] The identification of a Meissner effect rests entirely on zero-field-cooled (ZFC) susceptibility data; no field-cooled (FC) curves are shown for any sample. For a superconductor, the ZFC shielding signal is expected to be large relative to the FC response (which may be small, positive, or weakly diamagnetic due to flux trapping), whereas a magnetic transition of a trace impurity phase or a background step would give comparable ZFC and FC responses. Without FC data, the 80 K downturn in Figs. 3(b)–3(g) cannot be uniquely assigned to superconductivity, and the estimate of a 0.1–0.2% superconducting volume fraction is not secured. Please provide FC measurements on the same crystals and a direct ZFC/FC comparison.
  2. [Methods and Fig. 3] The reported susceptibility changes are at the 0.1–0.2% level of the total signal, yet no error bars, repeated background runs, or subtraction of the quartz holder and glue contribution are described. The text states the volume fraction is 'estimated using the relation ... ×100%' but the formula is garbled in the manuscript ('"!#$%!&×100%'), and no uncertainty is given for the 0.1% and 0.2% values. Please state the normalization and demagnetization assumptions, provide the raw M(T) data with and without background subtraction, show M(H) isotherms below and above 80 K, and give an explicit uncertainty budget for the volume-fraction estimate.
  3. [Fig. 4 and Discussion] The transport evidence consists of a broad ~30% resistance drop between 80 and 20 K with a plateau below 20 K (Fig. 4), but no zero resistance is achieved. The statement in the Discussion that this 'can be attributed to SC islands' is an interpretation; the same transport signature is compatible with a non-superconducting transport anomaly, a density-wave transition, or percolation effects unrelated to superconductivity. Because zero resistance is not observed, the magnetic data must bear the full weight of the claim, which makes the missing FC and local-probe evidence (e.g., scanning SQUID or MFM) load-bearing rather than supplemental.
  4. [Discussion] The proposed mechanism—that superconductivity arises at micrometer-scale domain boundaries where strain mimics hydrostatic pressure—is speculative and is not supported by direct microscopic evidence in this paper. The manuscript also states that 'the reason why the superconductivity is sensitive to the annealing time length is unclear,' yet this sensitivity is central to the reproducibility argument: sample #1 loses the signal after 24 h of annealing and sample #5 weakens after further annealing. Please address whether trace impurity phases (e.g., La4Ni3O10, LaNiO3, NiO, or oxygen-vacancy-ordered regions) could produce an 80 K magnetic feature, and provide a quantitative discussion of why extended annealing would destroy the proposed filamentary phase.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Results] Typo: 'critical in inducting superconductivity' should read 'critical in inducing superconductivity'.
  2. [Results] The formula for the superconducting volume fraction contains a garbled sequence ('"!#$%!&×100%') and should be typeset correctly with a defined normalization (e.g., 4πχ after demagnetization correction).
  3. [Fig. 2] The EDS composition La2.95Ni2O6.89 is reported without statistical uncertainty; please add standard deviations or detection limits for the spot measurements.
  4. [Discussion] The text refers to an 'upper critical magnetic field' consistent with the low volume fraction, but no Hc2 data are shown; either provide the field-dependent magnetization/resistivity from which Hc2 is inferred or remove this claim.
  5. [Methods] Single-crystal X-ray diffraction was collected at 80 K; it would be useful to state whether this temperature was chosen to check for a structural transition at the 80 K feature, and whether any structural anomaly is observed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the ambient-pressure 80 K signal is an empirical observation interpreted against an external high-pressure Tc benchmark, not a quantity derived from its own inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—a small diamagnetic ZFC susceptibility drop near 80 K in oxygen-annealed La3Ni2O7, with an estimated superconducting volume fraction of 0.1–0.2% and a resistivity decrease—is an empirical report, not a derivation from fitted parameters. The 80 K onset is anchored to the independently established high-pressure Tc of La3Ni2O7, an external benchmark rather than a quantity constructed from the present data. The susceptibility drop and the volume fraction are measured and then estimated from the same response, but this is quantification of the observation, not a prediction forced by an input parameter. The resistivity drop is presented as supportive but is explicitly acknowledged as not reaching zero resistance, and the interpretation of the ZFC feature as Meissner/Meissner-like screening is a scientific inference that could be wrong, but it is not circular: the paper does not define the superconducting response in terms of its conclusion. Self-citations appear (e.g., ref. [2] by the corresponding author group, and refs. [35, 48] related to sample characterization), but none carries the load-bearing argument; the key evidence is the new magnetic and transport data. Concerns about the absence of field-cooled measurements, error analysis, or alternative magnetic-transition explanations are substantive scientific critiques of evidence quality, not instances of the derivation reducing to its own inputs. Under the stated rules, the honest finding is no significant circularity, with score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

Free parameters: none. The paper reports measurements rather than fitting a model. Axioms: the main interpretative assumptions are that a small ZFC susceptibility drop at 80 K is the Meissner effect, that oxygen annealing controls oxygen vacancies, that the main bilayer phase hosts the signal, and that domain-boundary strain mimics pressure. Invented entities: the paper postulates filamentary superconducting regions at micrometer-scale domain boundaries; no direct local evidence is supplied, so independent_evidence is false.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption A negative drop in ZFC d.c. susceptibility below 80 K is the Meissner effect of superconducting regions.
    This is the central interpretation of Figs. 3(d)-3(g); it is not independently confirmed by zero resistance or field-cooled measurements.
  • domain assumption Annealing in high-pressure O2 reduces oxygen vacancies and this change allows superconductivity to appear.
    The paper relies on prior STEM evidence (ref. 35) for oxygen vacancy sites but does not directly measure oxygen content before and after annealing.
  • domain assumption The 80 K signal comes from the strained bilayer La3Ni2O7 phase rather than intergrowths or impurity phases.
    The paper argues from STEM main-phase imaging and identical Tc to the pressurized phase; no local probe directly identifies the superconducting regions.
  • ad hoc to paper Strain at micrometer-scale domain boundaries mimics hydrostatic pressure and induces superconductivity.
    This is a proposed mechanism in the Discussion, not directly measured; it is introduced to explain why the signal is filamentary.
invented entities (1)
  • Filamentary superconducting regions at micrometer-scale domain boundaries
    purpose: Explain the 0.1-0.2% volume fraction and the sensitivity to annealing time.
    The paper infers these regions from the low volume fraction and a prior SNOM study of domain stripes; no local superconducting probe or imaging of the filaments is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Low volume fraction of high-Tc superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 at 80 K and ambient pressure." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WZJT722T

@misc{pith2026250115929,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Low volume fraction of high-Tc superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 at 80 K and ambient pressure},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WZJT722T}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.15929}
}
read the original abstract

The discovery of superconductivity in pressurized La3Ni2O7 with a transition temperature of approximately 80 K above the boiling point of liquid nitrogen has sparked significant attention. It is essential to search for high-temperature superconductivity in bulk samples and at ambient pressure in nickelates. In this study, we report influential factors that affect the appearance of superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 at ambient pressure. From direct-current magnetic measurements, we observe a clear diamagnetic response at 80 K in post-annealed single crystals of La3Ni2O7 in oxygen. The superconducting volume fraction is estimated to be within 0.2%, resulting in a decrease in resistivity. This work presents a practical approach for further investigating high-temperature superconductivity in nickelates at ambient pressure.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    et al., Signatures of superconductivity near 80 K in a nickelate under high pressure

    Sun, H. et al., Signatures of superconductivity near 80 K in a nickelate under high pressure. Nature 621, 493 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    et al., Normal and superconducting properties of La3Ni2O7

    Wang, M. et al., Normal and superconducting properties of La3Ni2O7. Chin. Phys. Lett. 41, 077402 (2024)

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    et al., High-temperature superconductivity with zero resistance and strange-metal behaviour in La3Ni2O7−δ

    Zhang, Y . et al., High-temperature superconductivity with zero resistance and strange-metal behaviour in La3Ni2O7−δ. Nat. Phys. 20, 1269 (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    et al., Emergence of high-temperature superconducting phase in pressurized La3Ni2O7 crystals

    Hou, J. et al., Emergence of high-temperature superconducting phase in pressurized La3Ni2O7 crystals. Chin. Phys. Lett. 40, 117302 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    et al., Investigations of key issues on the reproducibility of high-Tc superconductivity emerging from compressed La3Ni2O7

    Zhou, Y . et al., Investigations of key issues on the reproducibility of high-Tc superconductivity emerging from compressed La3Ni2O7. arXiv: 2311.12361

    arXiv

  6. [6]

    et al., Pressure-driven right-triangle shape superconductivity in bilayer nickelate La3Ni2O7

    Li, J. et al., Pressure-driven right-triangle shape superconductivity in bilayer nickelate La3Ni2O7. arXiv:2404.11369

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    et al., Bulk high-temperature superconductivity in pressurized tetragonal La2PrNi2O7

    Wang, N. et al., Bulk high-temperature superconductivity in pressurized tetragonal La2PrNi2O7. Nature 634, 579 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    et al., Pressure-induced superconductivity in polycrystalline La3Ni2O7−δ

    Wang, G. et al., Pressure-induced superconductivity in polycrystalline La3Ni2O7−δ. Phys. Rev. X 14, 011040 (2024)

    work page 2024

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    et al., Phase diagram of pressure-induced high temperature superconductor La3Ni2O7+δ

    Ueki, Y . et al., Phase diagram of pressure-induced high temperature superconductor La3Ni2O7+δ. arXiv. 2408.04970

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    et al., Effects of pressure and doping on Ruddlesden-Popper phases Lan+1NinO3n+1

    Zhang, M. et al., Effects of pressure and doping on Ruddlesden-Popper phases Lan+1NinO3n+1. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 185, 147 (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    Sakakibara, H. et al., Theoretical analysis on the possibility of superconductivity in the trilayer Ruddlesden-Popper nickelate La4Ni3O10 under pressure and its experimental examination: comparison with La3Ni2O7. Phys. Rev. B 109, 144511 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    et al., Signature of superconductivity in pressurized La4Ni3O10

    Li, Q. et al., Signature of superconductivity in pressurized La4Ni3O10. Chin. Phys. Lett. 41, 017401 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    et al., Structural transition, electric transport, and electronic structures in the compressed trilayer nickelate La4Ni3O10

    Li, J. et al., Structural transition, electric transport, and electronic structures in the compressed trilayer nickelate La4Ni3O10. Sci. Chin. Phys. Mech. Astron. 67, 117403 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    et al., Superconductivity in pressurized trilayer La4Ni3O10−δ single crystals

    Zhu, Y . et al., Superconductivity in pressurized trilayer La4Ni3O10−δ single crystals. Nature 631, 531 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    et al., Signature of superconductivity in pressurized trilayer-nickelate Pr4Ni3O10−δ

    Huang, X. et al., Signature of superconductivity in pressurized trilayer-nickelate Pr4Ni3O10−δ. Chin. Phys. Lett. 41, 127403 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    et al., Pressure-induced superconductivity in Pr4Ni3O10 single crystals

    Pei, C. et al., Pressure-induced superconductivity in Pr4Ni3O10 single crystals. arXiv：2411.08677

  9. [17]

    Hibiki Nagata et al., Pressure-induced superconductivity in La4Ni3O10+δ (δ = 0.04 and −0.01) arXiv: 2405.19880

    arXiv

  10. [18]

    et al., Superconductivity in trilayer nickelate La4Ni3O10 under pressure

    Zhang, M. et al., Superconductivity in trilayer nickelate La4Ni3O10 under pressure. arXiv: 2311.07423

    arXiv

  11. [19]

    et al., Superconductivity in an infinite-layer nickelate

    Li, D. et al., Superconductivity in an infinite-layer nickelate. Nature 572, 624 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    et al., Superconductivity in a quintuple-layer square-planar nickelate

    Pan, G.A. et al., Superconductivity in a quintuple-layer square-planar nickelate. Nat. Mater. 21, 160 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    et al., Phase diagram and superconducting dome of infinite-layer Nd1-xSrxNiO2 thin films

    Zeng, S. et al., Phase diagram and superconducting dome of infinite-layer Nd1-xSrxNiO2 thin films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 147003 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    et al., Superconducting dome in Nd1-xSrxNiO2 infinite layer films

    Li, D. et al., Superconducting dome in Nd1-xSrxNiO2 infinite layer films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 027001 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    et al., Superconductivity in the parent infinite-layer nickelate NdNiO2

    Parzyck, C.T. et al., Superconductivity in the parent infinite-layer nickelate NdNiO2. arXiv: 2410.02007

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    et al., Superconductivity in PrNiO2 infinite-layer nickelates

    Sahib, H. et al., Superconductivity in PrNiO2 infinite-layer nickelates. arXiv: 2410.16147

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    et al., Evidence for charge and spin density waves in single crystals of La3Ni2O7 and La3Ni2O6

    Liu, Z. et al., Evidence for charge and spin density waves in single crystals of La3Ni2O7 and La3Ni2O6. Sci. Chin. Phys. Mech. Astron. 66, 217411 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    et al., Electronic and magnetic excitations in La3Ni2O7

    Chen, X.Y . et al., Electronic and magnetic excitations in La3Ni2O7. Nat. Commun. 15, 9597 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    et al., Electronic correlations and partial gap in the bilayer nickelate La3Ni2O7

    Liu, Z. et al., Electronic correlations and partial gap in the bilayer nickelate La3Ni2O7. Nat. Commun. 15, 7570 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    et al., Evidence of spin density waves in La3Ni2O7−δ

    Chen, K. et al., Evidence of spin density waves in La3Ni2O7−δ. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 256503 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    et al., Pressure-induced split of the density wave transitions in La3Ni2O7−δ

    Khasanov, R. et al., Pressure-induced split of the density wave transitions in La3Ni2O7−δ. arXiv: 2402.10485

    arXiv

  22. [30]

    et al., Density-wave-like gap evolution in La3Ni2O7 under high pressure revealed by ultrafast optical spectroscopy

    Meng, Y . et al., Density-wave-like gap evolution in La3Ni2O7 under high pressure revealed by ultrafast optical spectroscopy. Nat. Commun. 15, 10408 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    et al., Strong interlayer magnetic exchange coupling in La3Ni2O7-δ revealed by inelastic neutron scattering

    Xie, T. et al., Strong interlayer magnetic exchange coupling in La3Ni2O7-δ revealed by inelastic neutron scattering. Science Bulletin 69, 3221 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    et al., Orbital-dependent electron correlation in double-layer nickelate La3Ni2O7

    Yang, J. et al., Orbital-dependent electron correlation in double-layer nickelate La3Ni2O7. Nat. Commun. 15, 4373 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    et al., Structure responsible for the superconducting state in La3Ni2O7 at high-pressure and low-temperature conditions

    Wang, L. et al., Structure responsible for the superconducting state in La3Ni2O7 at high-pressure and low-temperature conditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 7506 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    et al., Chemical versus physical pressure effects on the structure transition of bilayer nickelates

    Wang, G. et al., Chemical versus physical pressure effects on the structure transition of bilayer nickelates. arXiv: 2408.09421

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    et al., Visualization of oxygen vacancies and self-doped ligand holes in La3Ni2O7−δ

    Dong, Z. et al., Visualization of oxygen vacancies and self-doped ligand holes in La3Ni2O7−δ. Nature 630, 847 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    et al., Bilayer two-orbital model of La3Ni2O7 under pressure

    Luo, Z. et al., Bilayer two-orbital model of La3Ni2O7 under pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 126001 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    et al., Correlated electronic structure of La3Ni2O7 under pressure

    Christiansson, V . et al., Correlated electronic structure of La3Ni2O7 under pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 206501 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    et al., Possible high Tc superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 under high pressure through manifestation of a nearly half-filled bilayer hubbard model

    Sakakibara, H. et al., Possible high Tc superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 under high pressure through manifestation of a nearly half-filled bilayer hubbard model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 106002 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    et al., Pressure driven fractionalization of ionic spins results in cupratelike high-Tc superconductivity in La3Ni2O7

    Jiang, R. et al., Pressure driven fractionalization of ionic spins results in cupratelike high-Tc superconductivity in La3Ni2O7. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 126503 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    et al., Interlayer-coupling-driven high-temperature superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 under pressure

    Lu, C. et al., Interlayer-coupling-driven high-temperature superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 under pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 146002 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    Oh, H., Zhang, Y .-H., Type-II t−J model and shared superexchange coupling from Hund's rule in superconducting La3Ni2O7. Phys. Rev. B 108, 174511 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    et al., Superexchange and charge transfer in the nickelate superconductor La3Ni2O7 under pressure

    Wú, W. et al., Superexchange and charge transfer in the nickelate superconductor La3Ni2O7 under pressure. Sci. Chin. Phys. Mech. Astron. 67, 117402 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    et al., Electronic correlations and superconducting instability in La3Ni2O7 under high pressure

    Lechermann, F. et al., Electronic correlations and superconducting instability in La3Ni2O7 under high pressure. Phys. Rev. B 108, L201121 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    et al., Long-range structural order in a hidden phase of Ruddlesden–Popper bilayer nickelate La3Ni2O7

    Wang, H. et al., Long-range structural order in a hidden phase of Ruddlesden–Popper bilayer nickelate La3Ni2O7. Inorg. Chem. 63, 5020 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    et al., Polymorphism in the Ruddlesden–Popper nickelate La3Ni2O7: discovery of a hidden phase with distinctive layer stacking

    Chen, X. et al., Polymorphism in the Ruddlesden–Popper nickelate La3Ni2O7: discovery of a hidden phase with distinctive layer stacking. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 3640 (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    et al., Design and synthesis of three-dimensional hybrid Ruddlesden-Popper nickelate single crystals

    Li, F. et al., Design and synthesis of three-dimensional hybrid Ruddlesden-Popper nickelate single crystals. Phys. Rev. Mater. 8, 053401 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    et al., Unconventional crystal structure of the high-pressure superconductor La3Ni2O7

    Puphal, P. et al., Unconventional crystal structure of the high-pressure superconductor La3Ni2O7. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 146002 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    et al., Revealing nanoscale structural phase separation in La3Ni2O7-δ single crystal via scanning near-field optical microscopy

    Zhou, X. et al., Revealing nanoscale structural phase separation in La3Ni2O7-δ single crystal via scanning near-field optical microscopy. arXiv: 2410.06602

    arXiv

  41. [49]

    et al., Signatures of ambient pressure superconductivity in thin film La3Ni2O7

    Ko, E.K. et al., Signatures of ambient pressure superconductivity in thin film La3Ni2O7. Nature, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586 (2024)

    2024 doi

  42. [50]

    et al., Ambient-pressure superconductivity onset above 40 K in bilayer nickelate ultrathin films

    Zhou, G. et al., Ambient-pressure superconductivity onset above 40 K in bilayer nickelate ultrathin films. arXiv: 2412.16622. Acknowledgements This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 12494591, No. 12425404, No. 12474137, and No. ...

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.