REVIEW 1 cited by
Stiff Transfer Learning for Physics-Informed Neural Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Stiff differential equations are prevalent in various scientific domains, posing significant challenges due to the disparate time scales of their components. As computational power grows, physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have led to significant improvements in modeling physical processes described by differential equations. Despite their promising outcomes, vanilla PINNs face limitations when dealing with stiff systems, known as failure modes. In response, we propose a novel approach, stiff transfer learning for physics-informed neural networks (STL-PINNs), to effectively tackle stiff ordinary differential equations (ODEs) and partial differential equations (PDEs). Our methodology involves training a Multi-Head-PINN in a low-stiff regime, and obtaining the final solution in a high stiff regime by transfer learning. This addresses the failure modes related to stiffness in PINNs while maintaining computational efficiency by computing "one-shot" solutions. The proposed approach demonstrates superior accuracy and speed compared to PINNs-based methods, as well as comparable computational efficiency with implicit numerical methods in solving stiff-parameterized linear and polynomial nonlinear ODEs and PDEs under stiff conditions. Furthermore, we demonstrate the scalability of such an approach and the superior speed it offers for simulations involving initial conditions and forcing function reparametrization.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Variational Boosting for Physics-Informed Neural Networks
A staged boosting method for PINNs, using small correction networks and per-stage Newton/CG optimization, converges on several stiff ODE/PDE benchmarks where monolithic PINNs do not, while being slower on easy problems.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.