REVIEW 1 cited by
Faster Newton Methods for Convex and Nonconvex Optimization in Gradient Complexity
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Second-order optimization methods are computationally expensive for large-scale problems. Recently, Doikov, Chayti, and Jaggi (ICML 2023) proposed the LazyCRN method that reduces computation by studying the gradient complexity of second-order methods. Their method can achieve a gradient complexity of $\mathcal{O}( \bar d + \bar d^{1/2} \epsilon^{-3/2})$ and $\mathcal{O}( \bar d + \bar d^{1/2} \epsilon^{-1/2})$ for nonconvex and convex optimization, respectively, where $\bar d$ is the effective dimension and $\epsilon$ is the target precision. Very recently, Adil, Bullins, Sidford, and Zhang (NeurIPS 2025) improved the gradient complexity to $\mathcal{O}( \bar d + \bar d^{1/3} \epsilon^{-3/2} \ln^{18} \epsilon^{-1})$ for nonconvex optimization. However, the tightness of these methods remains open. In this work, we propose new methods that achieve an improved complexity of $\mathcal{O}( \bar d + \bar d^{1/3} \epsilon^{-3/2})$ and $\mathcal{O}( (\bar d + \bar d^{13/21} \epsilon^{-2/7}) \ln \bar d)$ for nonconvex and convex optimization, respectively, improving best-known results for both setups.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Solving Convex-Concave Problems with $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\epsilon^{-4/7})$ Second-Order Oracle Complexity
A new triple-loop algorithm, Minimax-AIPE, solves convex-concave minimax problems with tilde O(epsilon^{-4/7}) second-order oracle calls, improving the previous O(epsilon^{-2/3}).
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.