Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Is Conversational XAI All You Need? Human-AI Decision Making With a Conversational XAI Assistant

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.17546 v1 pith:CPXUT3ZE submitted 2025-01-29 cs.HC cs.AI

classification cs.HCcs.AI
keywords conversationalinterfacessystemuserunderstandingusersdashboardfindings
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods are being proposed to help interpret and understand how AI systems reach specific predictions. Inspired by prior work on conversational user interfaces, we argue that augmenting existing XAI methods with conversational user interfaces can increase user engagement and boost user understanding of the AI system. In this paper, we explored the impact of a conversational XAI interface on users' understanding of the AI system, their trust, and reliance on the AI system. In comparison to an XAI dashboard, we found that the conversational XAI interface can bring about a better understanding of the AI system among users and higher user trust. However, users of both the XAI dashboard and conversational XAI interfaces showed clear overreliance on the AI system. Enhanced conversations powered by large language model (LLM) agents amplified over-reliance. Based on our findings, we reason that the potential cause of such overreliance is the illusion of explanatory depth that is concomitant with both XAI interfaces. Our findings have important implications for designing effective conversational XAI interfaces to facilitate appropriate reliance and improve human-AI collaboration. Code can be found at https://github.com/delftcrowd/IUI2025_ConvXAI

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Role of Visualization in LLM-Assisted Knowledge Graph Systems: Effects on User Trust, Exploration, and Workflows

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Visualizations designed to increase transparency in an LLM-based knowledge graph query tool actually led users, including experts, to overtrust incorrect outputs.

Pith tools