Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

TikTok's recommendations skewed towards Republican content during the 2024 U.S. presidential race

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.17831 v2 pith:K7CVX2PP submitted 2025-01-29 cs.SI cs.CY

classification cs.SIcs.CY
keywords contentrecommendationstiktokaccountspartisanalgorithmalgorithmicasymmetries
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

TikTok is a major force among social media platforms with over a billion monthly active users worldwide and 170 million in the United States. The platform's status as a key news source, particularly among younger demographics, raises concerns about its potential influence on politics in the U.S. and globally. Despite these concerns, there is scant research investigating TikTok's recommendation algorithm for political biases. We fill this gap by conducting 323 independent algorithmic audit experiments testing partisan content recommendations in the lead-up to the 2024 U.S. presidential elections. Specifically, we create hundreds of "sock puppet" TikTok accounts in Texas, New York, and Georgia, seeding them with varying partisan content and collecting algorithmic content recommendations for each of them. Collectively, these accounts viewed ~394,000 videos from April 30th to November 11th, 2024, which we label for political and partisan content. Our analysis reveals significant asymmetries in content distribution: Republican-seeded accounts received ~11.8% more party-aligned recommendations compared to their Democratic-seeded counterparts, and Democratic-seeded accounts were exposed to ~7.5% more opposite-party recommendations on average. These asymmetries exist across all three states and persist when accounting for video- and channel-level engagement metrics such as likes, views, shares, comments, and followers, and are driven primarily by negative partisanship content. Our findings provide insights into the inner workings of TikTok's recommendation algorithm during a critical election period, raising fundamental questions about platform neutrality.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Algorithmic Audit of Personalisation Drift in Polarising Topics on TikTok

    cs.IR 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    TikTok personalises strongly, neutralises climate/vaccine/flat-earth content toward safe neutral topics, but sustains and often stance-reinforces US politics—with a tilt toward the oppose stance when both sides are seeded.

  2. TikTok Rewards Divisive Political Messaging During the 2025 German Federal Election

    cs.SI 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Negative, angry, and outgroup-directed TikTok posts by German politicians attracted significantly more engagement than positive or relatable posts, and extreme parties both used and benefited from this style more than...

Pith tools