Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 166 references

Optimal-Reference Excited State Methods: Static Correlation at Polynomial Cost with Single-Reference Coupled-Cluster Approaches

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that planting static-correlation-preserving coupled cluster amplitudes into the intermediate state representation yields polynomial-cost excited-state energies accurate to about 0.2 eV and correct same-symmetry crossing…

desk verdict A solid, honest benchmark paper showing CCDf1-ISR(2) is a useful Hermitian excited-state method, with an overbroad abstract claim and a real but contained limitation from the (1+T2) reference. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.18135 v2 pith:WHKOLR6F submitted 2025-01-30 physics.chem-ph

Sylvia J. Bintrim , Kevin Carter-Fenk This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-ph
keywords excitedstatesstaticcorrelationintermediatestaterepresentationcoupledclusteraddition-by-subtractionCCCCDf1-ISR(2)conicalintersectionspolynomialscaling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is trying to establish that the robustness of addition-by-subtraction coupled cluster methods against static correlation can be carried over from ground states to excited states by using those CC amplitudes inside the intermediate state representation (ISR). Its central result is that CCDf1-ISR(2), built from a reference that keeps singlet-paired correlation while freezing pre-computed triplet-paired amplitudes, stays stable where ordinary CC and EOM-CC methods diverge and predicts excitation energies to within about 0.2 eV on small organic molecules. The same Hermitian construction reproduces the avoided crossing between the $2^{1}$A1 and $3^{1}$A1 states of formaldehyde that EOM-CCSD gets wrong. A reader should care because this is a polynomial-scaling, black-box, spin-pure route to statically correlated excited states, an area usually reserved for factorial multireference methods.

What carries the argument

The central object is the ISR(2) Hamiltonian matrix $M_{IJ} = \langle \tilde{\Psi}_I | \hat{H} - E_0 | \tilde{\Psi}_J \rangle$, whose correlated excited states are built by applying physical excitation operators to the reference and orthogonalizing them by Gram-Schmidt; this makes the eigenvalue problem Hermitian. The paper's innovation is to supply the reference wave function $(1 + \hat{T}_2)|\Phi_0\rangle$ from addition-by-subtraction CC methods instead of from MP2. In CCDf1, the triplet-paired amplitudes are solved first and then frozen while the singlet-paired channel is recoupled by solving the external CC equations to infinite order, so the reference carries the static correlation that ISR(2) then projects into the excited-state manifold.

What would settle it

Compute CCDf1-ISR(2) vertical excitation energies and excited-state potential energy surfaces for a transition-metal complex with known multiconfigurational excited states (for example an iron or chromium photocatalyst) and compare against a large-active-space CASPT2 or NEVPT2 benchmark. If the errors grow systematically beyond the roughly 0.2 eV seen for small organic molecules, or if same-symmetry crossings lose their correct topology, the claim of robustness in the face of static correlation would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the quality of the reference wave function, not just the excitation manifold, decides whether second-order ISR can describe static correlation in excited states. The authors insert ground-state amplitudes from pCCD, CCD0, CCD1, CCDf0, and CCDf1 into the ISR(2) secular problem built from the first-order CC wave function $(1+\hat{T}_2)|\Phi_0\rangle$, and show that CCDf1-ISR(2) smoothly dissociates N2 in the ground and $1^1\Pi_g$ states, tracks the ten-site Hubbard model well beyond the interaction strength where EOM-CCSD and ADC(2) break down, and reproduces the formaldehyde avoided-crossing topology with mean absolute errors of 0.21 eV over 52 Quest #1 singlet excitations. The recommended variant, BCCDf1-ISR(2), uses Brueckner orbitals to remove the reference-singles coupling and gives the same accuracy with a more even error distribution.

Load-bearing premise

The construction assumes that the first-order coupled cluster wave function $(1 + \hat{T}_2)|\Phi_0\rangle$ is a faithful reference for the excited states whenever the underlying ground-state amplitudes are good; the authors note in Section 4.1 that using the full exponential in the ground state but only the linearized wave function in ISR(2) over-stabilizes excited states at large interaction strength.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • CCDf1-ISR(2) reaches mean absolute errors of about 0.21 eV on the Quest #1 singlet excitation set, matching ADC(2) while remaining stable when the MP2 reference diverges.
  • The Hermitian ISR construction lets CCDf1-ISR(2) give the correct 2^1A1/3^1A1 avoided-crossing topology in formaldehyde, a case where standard EOM-CCSD predicts a spurious degeneracy.
  • BCCDf1-ISR(2), with Brueckner orbitals, removes outliers and is recommended for quantitative work, so the method is ready for benchmarking on photochemistry problems that need potential energy surface shapes.
  • CCSDf1-ISR(2) improves on ADC(2) for 1Ag states with substantial double-excitation character in polyenes, showing that a better ground-state reference also helps doubly excited states.
  • All of these variants scale polynomially (the CCDf1 bottleneck is O(N^6)), so the approach offers a single-reference, black-box alternative to active-space methods for statically correlated excited states.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • We infer that the unbalanced treatment of the reference -- full exponential $e^{\hat{T}_2}$ in the ground state versus first-order $(1+\hat{T}_2)$ in ISR(2) -- is the main source of the asymmetric over-stabilization the authors observe at strong interaction strengths, and that a matched-order ISR built on the full exponential would be the natural next test.
  • We infer that the optimal-reference concept is portable: any ground-state method that captures static correlation in a single-determinant framework, such as orbital-optimized pair theories or regularized CC, could be substituted into the same ISR(2) machinery with minimal reimplementation.
  • We infer that because ISR(2) gives size-intensive oscillator strengths and correct same-symmetry crossing topology, it is a promising engine for nonadiabatic dynamics simulations, a use the authors flag but do not yet demonstrate.
  • We infer that the pCCD-ISR(2) failure with canonical orbitals and rescue by Brueckner orbitals implies that orbital invariance, not reference quality alone, controls whether an optimal-reference excited-state method works; future methods should be screened for orbital-rotation sensitivity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a family of excited-state methods that combine 'addition-by-subtraction' coupled-cluster reference wave functions (pCCD, CCD0, CCD1, CCDf0/CCDf1) with the intermediate state representation (ISR) at second order, yielding CC-ISR(2) approaches. The central claim is that CCDf1-ISR(2) is robust against static correlation, provides enough dynamical correlation to give excitation energies accurate to about 0.2 eV for small organic molecules, and, thanks to the Hermitian ISR construction, correctly describes avoided crossings where EOM-CCSD fails. The paper benchmarks these methods on the 10-site Hubbard model, N2 dissociation, the formaldehyde PES, the Quest #1 database, and double-excitation states in linear polyenes. Overall, the work is a well-structured exploration of an interesting idea, with credible evidence that certain CC-ISR(2) variants outperform ADC(2) and EOM-CCSD in statically correlated regimes, but the abstract's accuracy claim is overstated and the reliance on a first-order (1+T2) reference for the excited-state Hamiltonian is a load-bearing approximation that deserves more scrutiny.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this is a valuable contribution to excited-state quantum chemistry: a polynomial-scaling, single-reference, spin-pure, Hermitian method that handles static correlation better than standard ADC(2) or EOM-CCSD, with potential utility in photodynamics and avoided-crossing topology. The paper provides reproducible benchmarks (Hubbard model, N2 PES, Quest #1, polyenes) and a transparent discussion of the method's limitations. The Quest #1 MAE of 0.21 eV for CCDf1-ISR(2) and the smooth N2 PES are concrete strengths. However, the significance is tempered by the fact that the double-excitation results are considerably less accurate (MAE 0.53 eV in Table 1) and by the authors' own admission that the first-order wave function truncation over-stabilizes excited states in strongly correlated regimes.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. 4.5, Table 1] The abstract's claim that CCDf1-ISR(2) predicts excitation energies 'to within about 0.2 eV in small organic molecules' is contradicted by Table 1, which reports a mean absolute error of 0.53 eV for CCSDf1-ISR(2) on four alkenes, with individual errors as large as 1.45 eV (hexatriene 2^1Ag: TBE 5.09 eV vs. 6.54 eV). The 0.21 eV MAE quoted in Sec. 4.4 refers specifically to the 52 singlet excitations in the Quest #1 database at equilibrium geometries, which is a different and narrower class of states. The abstract and concluding statements should be qualified to the Quest #1 benchmark and should not imply that the cited accuracy extends to double-excitation-dominated states.
  2. [Sec. 4.1 and Eq. (19)] The ISR(2) excited-state Hamiltonian is built from the first-order wave function (1+T2)|Φ0>, whereas the ground-state CC energy and amplitudes come from the full exponential e^{T2}|Φ0>. The authors themselves show in Sec. 4.1 that this imbalance over-stabilizes excited states at large U/|t| (the excited-state energies begin to decrease incorrectly beyond U/|t|~10), and in the Conclusions they state that 'a more rigorous approach than CC-ISR(2) should treat the ground and excited state wave function at the same level of approximation.' Because the paper's central claim is robustness in the face of static correlation, this truncation is load-bearing. The current evidence for robustness is limited to U/|t|≤8 in the Hubbard chain and to the equilibrium and moderately stretched regions of N2; the method is not tested in the regime where T2 amplitudes become large, such as strongly correlated polyene geometries or the avoided-crossing region of formaldehyde. The authors should either provide such tests or explicitly limit the robustness claim to the tested correlation regimes.
  3. [Sec. 4.5, Table 1] The presentation of the double-excitation results is more positive than the data warrant. The text states that CCSDf1-ISR(2) 'performs slightly better than ADC(2) (by about 0.1 eV) even for double excitations' and is 'on par with EOM-CCSD' for the 1Ag states, but the mean absolute error of 0.53 eV is more than twice the 0.2 eV accuracy claimed in the abstract. For the 2^1Ag states specifically, the errors are 0.93 eV (butadiene), 1.45 eV (hexatriene), and 1.27 eV (octatetraene), which are not quantitatively accurate. The conclusion that 'improving the ground-state reference can impart improvements to the predicted excitation energies' is supported only in a weak sense (a small MAE reduction relative to ADC(2)), and the text should clearly distinguish qualitative from quantitative accuracy when discussing double excitations.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout (e.g., Sec. 4.1, 4.2, 4.3)] The manuscript contains many unresolved placeholder references such as 'Table ??', 'Fig. ??', and 'Figure ??' (e.g., Sec. 4.1, Sec. 4.2, Sec. 4.3). These should be resolved before the paper can be properly assessed by readers.
  2. [Sec. 2.1] The acronym 'FpiCCD' is introduced without definition, and the subsequent text uses 'CCDf1' instead; please clarify the relationship between these terms.
  3. [Sec. 4.2 and Fig. 2] The CASSCF@NEVPT2 reference is approximated by CASSCF alone at R_NN = 0.9 and 1.0 Å, but this is only mentioned in the figure caption, not in the main text; this approximation should be stated explicitly in the text.
  4. [Sec. 4.3 and Fig. 3] TD-DFT with ωB97X-D is used as a qualitative reference for the formaldehyde avoided crossing; the paper should note that TD-DFT is not a high-accuracy benchmark for excited-state topology and that the agreement is only qualitative.
  5. [Sec. 4.1] The statement that 'many physical systems fall within U/|t|≤8' is supported by citations to Hubbard-model literature, but a more quantitative argument or a diagnostic based on the size of T2 amplitudes would strengthen the claim that the tested range covers physically relevant strong correlation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the excitation energies are genuine predictions benchmarked against independent references, with no fitted parameters or self-citation chain doing the work.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are derived from deterministic wave-function equations and benchmarked against independent references: FCI for the Hubbard model, CASSCF(6,6)@NEVPT2 for N2 potential energy surfaces, TD-DFT and literature for the formaldehyde avoided-crossing topology, and the Quest#1 theoretical best estimates plus Thiel/Walter polyene benchmarks for absolute excitation energies. No parameter is fitted to the target data, and the reported excitation energies follow from solving the Hermitian ISR secular equation, not from any input quantity that already contains those energies. The inherited (1+T2) reference approximation in ISR(2), taken from Dreuw and co-workers, is an acknowledged formal approximation rather than a result smuggled in by self-citation; the authors are not citing their own prior work. The paper itself flags the ground/excited-state treatment imbalance (Sec. 4.1 and Conclusions), but a disclosed limitation is not circular reasoning. The core robustness claims remain independently falsifiable and empirically supported, so the paper warrants a score of 0 on the circularity scale.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The methods introduce no fitted parameters and no new physical entities. The central claims rest on standard quantum-chemical approximations (ISR perturbation theory, first-order CC wavefunction, Brueckner orbitals) and on the accuracy of the external benchmark references. No ad hoc-to-paper axioms were identified beyond the reuse of existing ISR machinery.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The ISR(2) perturbation expansion in the fluctuation potential is valid for the tested single-reference CC references.
    The entire method inherits the ISR perturbative ordering (Sec. 2.2); no proof is given that this ordering remains valid when the reference is a CC wavefunction with static correlation, though the benchmarks suggest it holds for the tested cases.
  • domain assumption The first-order Taylor approximation e^T2 approximately equals 1 + T2 is a faithful representation of the CC ground state for constructing ISR excited states.
    Used in Eq. 20 (Sec. 2.3); the authors note it is 'not strictly formally justifiable' but rely on it to build the ISR(2) Hamiltonian.
  • standard math Brueckner orbital rotations exist and set t1 to zero, giving an orbital-invariant-like reference for the CC-ISR(2) methods.
    Relies on Thouless' theorem (Sec. 2.4, Eq. 21) to compute Brueckner orbitals; standard in quantum chemistry.
  • domain assumption The Quest #1 theoretical best estimates and CASSCF(6,6)@NEVPT2 are accurate benchmarks for comparison.
    The paper compares against external TBEs from Loos et al. and NEVPT2 for the N2 PES; assumes these references are accurate enough to judge the new methods.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Optimal-Reference Excited State Methods: Static Correlation at Polynomial Cost with Single-Reference Coupled-Cluster Approaches." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WHKOLR6F

@misc{pith2026250118135,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Optimal-Reference Excited State Methods: Static Correlation at Polynomial Cost with Single-Reference Coupled-Cluster Approaches},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WHKOLR6F}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.18135}
}
read the original abstract

Accurate yet efficient modeling of chemical systems with pronounced static correlation in their excited states remains a significant challenge in quantum chemistry, as most electronic structure methods that can adequately capture static correlation scale factorially with system size. Researchers are often left with no option but to use more affordable methods that may lack the accuracy required to model critical processes in photochemistry such as photolysis, photocatalysis, and non-adiabatic relaxation. A great deal of work has been dedicated to refining single-reference descriptions of static correlation in the ground state via ``addition-by-subtraction'' coupled cluster methods such as pair coupled cluster with double substitutions (pCCD), singlet-paired CCD (CCD0), triplet-paired CCD (CCD1), and CCD with frozen singlet- or triplet-paired amplitudes (CCDf0/CCDf1). By combining wave functions derived from these methods with the intermediate state representation (ISR), we gain insights into the extensibility of single-reference coupled cluster theory's coverage of static correlation to the excited state problem. Our CCDf1-ISR(2) approach is robust in the face of static correlation and provides enough dynamical correlation to accurately predict excitation energies to within about 0.2~eV in small organic molecules. We also highlight distinct advantages of the Hermitian ISR construction, such as the avoidance of pathological failures of equation-of-motion methods for excited state potential energy surface topology. Our results prompt us to continue exploring optimal single-reference theories (excited state approaches that leverage dependence on the initial reference wave function) as a potentially economical approach to the excited state static correlation problem.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.18135 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Ground state (ES0 ), (b) first singlet excited state (ES1 ), and (c) first singlet excitation (ES1 − ES0 ) ener￾gies as a function of interaction strength (U/|t = −1.5|) for a 10-site, half-filled Hubbard model with open boundary con￾ditions. The FCI result is exact for both states and acts as the reference. The CC/CC-ISR(2), CCSD/EOM-CCSD, and MP2/ADC(2) results are computed using canonical Hartree￾Fock orbital… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Potential energy surfaces along the bond-stretching coordinate of N [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Excited state energies for formaldehyde as a function of C [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The 18 molecules in the Quest #1 database. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Error statistics (in eV) of 52 singlet excitation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

166 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J.;\ \ Taylor, P

    Lee, T. J.;\ \ Taylor, P. R. A diagnostic for determining the quality of single-reference electron correlation methods. Int. J. Quantum Chem 1989, 36, 199--207

    1989

  2. [2]

    J.;\ \ Stanton, J

    Bartlett, R. J.;\ \ Stanton, J. F. Applications of post-Hartree--Fock mehods: A tutorial. In Reviews in Computational Chemistry, Vol. 5; Lipkowitz, K. B.;\ \ Boyd, D. B.,\ \ Eds.; VCH: New York, 1994; Chapter 2, pages 65--169

    1994

  3. [3]

    Mok, D. K. W.;\ \ Neumann, R.;\ \ Handy, N. C. Dynamical and nondynamical correlation. J. Phys.\ Chem. 1996, 100, 6225--6230

    1996

  4. [4]

    C.;\ \ Cohen, A

    Handy, N. C.;\ \ Cohen, A. J. Left-right correlation energy. Mol.\ Phys. 2001, 99, 403--412

    2001

  5. [5]

    Entanglement measures for single-and multireference correlation effects

    Boguslawski, K.;\ \ Tecmer, P.;\ \ Legeza, O.;\ \ Reiher, M. Entanglement measures for single-and multireference correlation effects. J. Phys.\ Chem.\ Lett. 2012, 3, 3129--3135

    2012

  6. [6]

    Crittenden, D. L. A hierarchy of static correlation models. J. Phys.\ Chem. A 2013, 117, 3852--3860

    2013

  7. [7]

    Extended m ller- P lesset perturbation theory for dynamical and static correlations

    Tsuchimochi, T.;\ \ Van Voorhis , T. Extended m ller- P lesset perturbation theory for dynamical and static correlations. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2014, 141, 164117:1--5

    2014

  8. [8]

    W.;\ \ Hosseini, H.;\ \ Menzies, C

    Hollett, J. W.;\ \ Hosseini, H.;\ \ Menzies, C. A cumulant functional for static and dynamic correlation. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2016, 145, 084106:1--14

    2016

Show all 166 references
  1. [9]

    Separation of dynamic and nondynamic correlation

    Ramos-Cordoba , E.;\ \ Salvador, P.;\ \ Matito, E. Separation of dynamic and nondynamic correlation. Phys.\ Chem.\ Chem.\ Phys. 2016, 18, 24105--24023

    2016

  2. [10]

    L.;\ \ Lathiotakis, N

    Benavides-Riveros , C. L.;\ \ Lathiotakis, N. N.;\ \ Marques, M. A. L. Towards a formal definition of static and dynamic electronic correlations. Phys.\ Chem.\ Chem.\ Phys. 2017, 19, 12655--12664

    2017

  3. [11]

    Singling out dynamic and nondynamic correlation

    Via-Nadal , M.;\ \ Rodr \'i guez-Mayorga , M.;\ \ Ramos-Cordoba , E.;\ \ Matito, E. Singling out dynamic and nondynamic correlation. J. Phys.\ Chem.\ Lett. 2019, 10, 4032--4037

    2019

  4. [12]

    Inhomogeneous electron gas

    Hohenberg, P.;\ \ Kohn, W. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys.\ Rev. 1964, 136, B864--B871

    1964

  5. [13]

    Kohn, W.;\ \ Sham, L. J. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys.\ Rev. 1965, 140, A1133--A1138

    1965

  6. [14]

    Density functional theory: coverage of dynamic and non-dynamic correlation effects

    Cremer, D. Density functional theory: coverage of dynamic and non-dynamic correlation effects. Mol.\ Phys. 2001, 99, 1899--1940

    2001

  7. [15]

    Density functional theory with fractional orbital occupations

    Chai, J.-D. Density functional theory with fractional orbital occupations. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2012, 136, 154104:1--17

    2012

  8. [16]

    Becke, A. D. Density functional for static, dynamical, and strong correlation. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2013, 138, 074109:1--10

    2013

  9. [17]

    Q.;\ \ Li, C.;\ \ Yang, W

    Su, N. Q.;\ \ Li, C.;\ \ Yang, W. Describing strong correlation with fractional-spin correction in density functional theory. Proc.\ Natl.\ Acad.\ Sci.\ USA 2018, 115, 9678--9683

    2018

  10. [18]

    Reformulation of thermally assisted-occupation density functional theory in the K ohn– S ham framework

    Yeh, S.-H.;\ \ Yang, W.;\ \ Hsu, C.-P. Reformulation of thermally assisted-occupation density functional theory in the K ohn– S ham framework. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2022, 156, 174108:1--11

    2022

  11. [19]

    A challenge for density functionals: Self -interaction error increases for systems with a noninteger number of electrons

    Zhang, Y.;\ \ Yang, W. A challenge for density functionals: Self -interaction error increases for systems with a noninteger number of electrons. J. Chem.\ Phys. 1998, 109, 2604--2608

    1998

  12. [20]

    J.;\ \ Yang, W

    Mori-S\'anchez , P.;\ \ Cohen, A. J.;\ \ Yang, W. Many-electron self-interaction error in approximate density functionals. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2006, 125, 201201:1--4

    2006

  13. [21]

    J.;\ \ Yang, W

    Mori-S\'anchez , P.;\ \ Cohen, A. J.;\ \ Yang, W. Localization and delocalization errors in density functional theory and implications for band-gap prediction. Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett. 2008, 100, 146401:1--4

    2008

  14. [22]

    Improving ``difficult'' reaction barriers with self-interaction corrected density functional theory

    Patchkovskii, S.;\ \ Ziegler, T. Improving ``difficult'' reaction barriers with self-interaction corrected density functional theory. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2002, 116, 7806--7813

    2002

  15. [23]

    B.;\ \ Mishra, P.;\ \ Baruah, T.;\ \ Zope, R

    Shukla, P. B.;\ \ Mishra, P.;\ \ Baruah, T.;\ \ Zope, R. R.;\ \ Jackson, K. A.;\ \ Johnson, J. K. How do self-interaction errors associated with stretched bonds affect barrier height predictions? J. Phys.\ Chem. A 2023, 127, 1750--1759

    2023

  16. [24]

    J.;\ \ Amos, R

    Tozer, D. J.;\ \ Amos, R. D.;\ \ Handy, N. C.;\ \ Roos, B. O.;\ \ Serrano-Andr\'es, L. Does density functional theory contribute to the understanding of excited states of unsaturated organic compounds? Mol.\ Phys. 1999, 97, 859--868

    1999

  17. [25]

    E.;\ \ Gutierrez, F.;\ \ Guan, J.;\ \ Gadea, F.-X.;\ \ Salahub, D.;\ \ Daudey, J.-P

    Casida, M. E.;\ \ Gutierrez, F.;\ \ Guan, J.;\ \ Gadea, F.-X.;\ \ Salahub, D.;\ \ Daudey, J.-P. Charge-transfer correction for improved time-dependent local density approximation excited-state potential energy curves: A nalysis within the two-level model with illustration for ...

    2000

  18. [26]

    L.;\ \ Head-Gordon , M

    Dreuw, A.;\ \ Weisman, J. L.;\ \ Head-Gordon , M. Long-range charge-transfer excited states in time-dependent density functional theory require non-local exchange. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2003, 119, 2943--2946

    2003

  19. [27]

    Dreuw, A.;\ \ Head-Gordon, M. Failure of time-dependent density functional theory for long-range charge-transfer excited-states: The zinc\-bac\-ter\-i\-o\-chlorin--bac\-ter\-i\-o\-chlorin and bac\-ter\-i\-o\-chlor\-o\-phyll--spheroidene complexes. J. Am.\ Chem.\ Soc. 2004, 126...

    2004

  20. [28]

    Hartree- Fock exchange in time dependent density functional theory: A pplication to charge transfer excitations in solvated molecular systems

    Bernasconi, L.;\ \ Sprik, M.;\ \ Hutter, J. Hartree- Fock exchange in time dependent density functional theory: A pplication to charge transfer excitations in solvated molecular systems. Chem.\ Phys.\ Lett. 2004, 394, 141--146

    2004

  21. [29]

    Neugebauer, J.;\ \ Gritsenko, O.;\ \ Baerends, E. J. Assessment of a simple correction for the long-range charge-transfer problem in time-dependent density functional theory. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2006, 124, 214102:1--11

    2006

  22. [30]

    Lange, A.;\ \ Herbert, J. M. Simple methods to reduce charge-transfer contamination in time-dependent density-functional calculations of clusters and liquids. J. Chem.\ Theory Comput. 2007, 3, 1680--1690

    2007

  23. [31]

    M.;\ \ Mar, B

    Isborn, C. M.;\ \ Mar, B. D.;\ \ Curchod, B. F. E.;\ \ Tavernelli, I.;\ \ Mart\' nez, T. J. The charge transfer problem in density functional theory calculations of aqueously solvated molecules. J. Phys.\ Chem. B 2013, 117, 12189--12201

    2013

  24. [32]

    J.;\ \ Tretiak, S

    Magyar, R. J.;\ \ Tretiak, S. Dependence of spurious charge-transfer excited states on orbital exchange in TDDFT : Large molecules and clusters. J. Chem.\ Theory Comput. 2007, 3, 976--987

    2007

  25. [33]

    Peach, M. J. G.;\ \ Benfield, P.;\ \ Helgaker, T.;\ \ Tozer, D. J. Excitation energies in density functional theory: An evaluation and a diagnostic test. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2008, 128, 044118:1--18

    2008

  26. [34]

    W.;\ \ Rohrdanz, M

    Lange, A. W.;\ \ Rohrdanz, M. A.;\ \ Herbert, J. M. Charge-transfer excited states in a -stacked adenine dimer, as predicted using long-range-corrected time-dependent density functional theory. J. Phys.\ Chem. B 2008, 112, 6304--6308 Erratum: J. Phys.\ Chem. B\/ 112, 7345 (2008)

    2008

  27. [35]

    Head-Gordon , D

    Liang, J.;\ \ Feng, X.;\ \ ad M. Head-Gordon , D. H. Revisiting the performance of time-dependent density functional theory for electronic excitations: A ssessment of 43 popular and recently developed functionals from rungs one to four. J. Chem.\ Theory Comput. 2022, 18, 3460--3473

    2022

  28. [36]

    R.;\ \ Herbert, J

    Broderick, D. R.;\ \ Herbert, J. M. Delocalization error poisons the density-functional many-body expansion. Chem.\ Sci. 2024, 15, 19893--19906

    2024

  29. [37]

    Szabo, A.;\ \ Ostlund, N. S. Modern Quantum Chemistry; Macmillan: New York, 1982

    1982

  30. [38]

    Das, G.;\ \ Wahl, A. C. Extended Hartree-Fock wavefunctions: Optimized valence configurations for h _ 2 and li _ 2 , optimized double configurations for f _ 2 . J. Chem.\ Phys. 1966, 44, 87--96

    1966

  31. [39]

    O.;\ \ Taylor, P

    Roos, B. O.;\ \ Taylor, P. R.;\ \ Sigbahn, P. E. A complete active space SCF method ( CASSCF ) using a density matrix formulated super- CI approach. Chem.\ Phys. 1980, 48, 157--173

    1980

  32. [40]

    Roos, B. O. The complete active space SCF method in a fock-matrix-based super- CI formulation. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1980, 18, 175--189

    1980

  33. [41]

    G.;\ \ M\"uller, T.;\ \ Gidofalvi, G.;\ \ Lischka, H.;\ \ Shepard, R

    Szalay, P. G.;\ \ M\"uller, T.;\ \ Gidofalvi, G.;\ \ Lischka, H.;\ \ Shepard, R. Multiconfiguration self-consistent field and multireference configuration interaction methods and applications. Chem.\ Rev. 2012, 112, 108--181

    2012

  34. [42]

    A coupled-cluster approach to the many-body perturbation theory for open-shell systems

    Lindgren, I. A coupled-cluster approach to the many-body perturbation theory for open-shell systems. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1978, 14, 33--58

    1978

  35. [43]

    Jeziorski, B.;\ \ Monkhorst, H. J. Coupled-cluster method for multideterminental reference states. Phys.\ Rev. A 1981, 24, 1668--1681

    1981

  36. [44]

    Evangelista, F. A. Perspective: Multireference coupled cluster theories of dynamical electron correlation. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2018, 149, 030901:1--13

    2018

  37. [45]

    Gilbert, T. L. Hohenberg-kohn theorem for nonlocal external potentials. Phys.\ Rev. B 1975, 12, 2111--2120

    1975

  38. [46]

    Density-matrix functional theory for the n -particle ground state

    Zumbach, G.;\ \ Maschke, K. Density-matrix functional theory for the n -particle ground state. J. Chem.\ Phys. 1985, 82, 5604--5607

    1985

  39. [47]

    Density-cumulant functional theory

    Kutzelnigg, W. Density-cumulant functional theory. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2006, 125, 171101:1--4

    2006

  40. [48]

    Y.;\ \ Schaefer, III , H

    Sokolov, A. Y.;\ \ Schaefer, III , H. F. Orbital-optimized density cumulant functional theory. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2013, 139, 204110:1--9

    2013

  41. [49]

    M.;\ \ van Meer , R.;\ \ Gritsenko, O

    Mentel, . M.;\ \ van Meer , R.;\ \ Gritsenko, O. V.;\ \ Baerends, E. J. The density matrix functional approach to electron correlation: Dynamic and nondynamic correlation along the full dissociation coordinate. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2014, 140, 214105:1--18

    2014

  42. [50]

    Communication: Relating the pure and ensemble density matrix functional

    Schilling, C. Communication: Relating the pure and ensemble density matrix functional. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2018, 149, 231102:1--5

    2018

  43. [51]

    Explicit approximate relation between reduced two- and one-particle density matrices

    M \"u ller, A. Explicit approximate relation between reduced two- and one-particle density matrices. Phys.\ Lett.\ A 1984, 105, 446--452

    1984

  44. [52]

    Goedecker, S.;\ \ Umrigar, C. J. Natural orbital functional for the many-electron problem. Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett. 1998, 81, 866--869

    1998

  45. [53]

    One‐particle density matrix functional for correlation in molecular systems

    Piris, M.;\ \ Otto, P. One‐particle density matrix functional for correlation in molecular systems. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2003, 94, 317--323

    2003

  46. [54]

    Assessment of a new approach for the two-electron cumulant in natural-orbital-functional theory

    Leiva, P.;\ \ Piris, M. Assessment of a new approach for the two-electron cumulant in natural-orbital-functional theory. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2005, 123, 214102:1--7

    2005

  47. [55]

    R.;\ \ Pernal, K.;\ \ Gritsenko, O

    Rohr, D. R.;\ \ Pernal, K.;\ \ Gritsenko, O. V.;\ \ Baerends, E. J. A density matrix functional with occupation number driven treatment of dynamical and nondynamical correlation. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2008, 129, 164105:1--11

    2008

  48. [56]

    A natural orbital functional based on an explicit approach of the two‐electron cumulant

    Piris, M. A natural orbital functional based on an explicit approach of the two‐electron cumulant. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2013, 113, 620--630

    2013

  49. [57]

    Interacting pairs in natural orbital functional theory

    Piris, M. Interacting pairs in natural orbital functional theory. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2014, 141, 044107:1--6

    2014

  50. [58]

    Global method for electron correlation

    Piris, M. Global method for electron correlation. Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett. 2017, 119, 063002:1--5

    2017

  51. [59]

    Dynamic electron-correlation energy in the natural-orbital-functional second-order- M ller - Plesset method from the orbital-invariant perturbation theory

    Piris, M. Dynamic electron-correlation energy in the natural-orbital-functional second-order- M ller - Plesset method from the orbital-invariant perturbation theory. Phys.\ Rev. A 2018, 98, 022504:1--6

    2018

  52. [60]

    W.;\ \ Loos, P

    Hollett, J. W.;\ \ Loos, P. Capturing static and dynamic correlation with NO-MP2 and NO-CCSD . J. Chem.\ Phys. 2020, 152, 014101:1--11

    2020

  53. [61]

    Lischka, H.;\ \ Nachtigallov\'a, D.;\ \ Aquino, A. J. A.;\ \ Szalay, P. G.;\ \ Plasser, F.;\ \ Machado, F. B. C.;\ \ Barbatti, M. Multireference approaches for excited states of molecules. Chem.\ Rev. 2018, 118, 7293--7361

    2018

  54. [62]

    V.;\ \ Jacquemin, D.;\ \ Vacher, M

    Papineau, T. V.;\ \ Jacquemin, D.;\ \ Vacher, M. Which electronic structure method to choose in trajectory surface hopping dynamics simulations? azomethane as a case study. J. Phys.\ Chem.\ Lett. 2024, 15, 636--643

    2024

  55. [63]

    N.;\ \ Shea, J

    Tran, L. N.;\ \ Shea, J. A. R.;\ \ Neuscamman, E. Tracking excited states in wave function optimization using density matrices and variational principles. J. Chem.\ Theory Comput. 2019, 15, 4790--4803

    2019

  56. [64]

    N.;\ \ Neuscamman, E

    Tran, L. N.;\ \ Neuscamman, E. Improving excited-state potential energy surfaces via optimal orbital shapes. J. Phys.\ Chem. A 2020, 124, 8273--8279

    2020

  57. [65]

    Applying generalized variational principles to excited-state-specific complete active space self-consistent field theory

    Hanscam, R.;\ \ Neuscamman, E. Applying generalized variational principles to excited-state-specific complete active space self-consistent field theory. J. Chem.\ Theory Comput. 2022, 18, 6608--6621

    2022

  58. [66]

    N.;\ \ Neuscamman, E

    Tran, L. N.;\ \ Neuscamman, E. Exploring ligand-to-metal charge-transfer states in the photo-ferrioxalate system using excited-state specific optimization. J. Phys.\ Chem.\ Lett. 2023, 14, 7454--7460

    2023

  59. [67]

    Marie, A.;\ \ Burton, H. G. A. Excited states, symmetry breaking, and unphysical solutions in state-specific CASSCF theory. J. Phys.\ Chem. A 2023, 127, 4538--4552

    2023

  60. [68]

    State-specific configuration interaction for excited states

    Kossoski, F.;\ \ Loos, P. State-specific configuration interaction for excited states. J. Chem.\ Theory Comput. 2023, 19, 2258--2269

    2023

  61. [69]

    L.;\ \ J /o rgensen, P

    Yeager, D. L.;\ \ J /o rgensen, P. A multiconfigurational time-dependent hartree-fock approach. Chem.\ Phys.\ Lett. 1979, 65, 77--80

    1979

  62. [70]

    Time-dependent multiconfigurational Hartree - Fock theory

    Dalgaard, E. Time-dependent multiconfigurational Hartree - Fock theory. J. Chem.\ Phys. 1980, 72, 816--823

    1980

  63. [71]

    Linear and nonlinear response functions for an exact state and for an MCSCF state

    Olsen, J.;\ \ J rgensen, P. Linear and nonlinear response functions for an exact state and for an MCSCF state. J. Chem.\ Phys. 1985, 82, 3235--3264

    1985

  64. [72]

    An efficient variational principle for the direct optimization of excited states

    Zhao, L.;\ \ Neuscamman, E. An efficient variational principle for the direct optimization of excited states. J. Chem.\ Theory Comput. 2016, 12, 3436--3440

    2016

  65. [73]

    Shea, J. A. R.;\ \ Neuscamman, E. Communication: A mean field platform for excited state quantum chemistry. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2018, 149, 081101:1--5

    2018

  66. [74]

    S.;\ \ Neuscamman, E

    Hardikar, T. S.;\ \ Neuscamman, E. A self-consistent field formulation of excited state mean field theory. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2020, 153, 164108:1--6

    2020

  67. [75]

    Density functional extension to excited-state mean-field theory

    Zhao, L.;\ \ Neuscamman, E. Density functional extension to excited-state mean-field theory. J. Chem.\ Theory Comput. 2020, 16, 164--178

    2020

  68. [76]

    Shea, J. A. R.;\ \ Gwin, E.;\ \ Neuscamman, E. A generalized variational principle with applications to excited state mean field theory. J. Chem.\ Theory Comput. 2020, 16, 1526--1540

    2020

  69. [77]

    Clune, R.;\ \ Shea, J. A. R.;\ \ Neuscamman, E. N ^5 -scaling excited-state-specific perturbation theory. J. Chem.\ Theory Comput. 2020, 16, 6132--6141

    2020

  70. [78]

    Sokolov, A. Y. Multi-reference algebraic diagrammatic construction theory for excited states: General formulation and first-order implementation. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2018, 149, 204113:1--15

    2018

  71. [79]

    Chatterjee, K.;\ \ Sokolov, A. Y. Second-order multireference algebraic diagrammatic construction theory for photoelectron spectra of strongly correlated systems. J. Chem.\ Theory Comput. 2019, 15, 5908--5924

    2019

  72. [80]

    Chatterjee, K.;\ \ Sokolov, A. Y. Extended second-order multireference algebraic diagrammatic construction theory for charged excitations. J. Chem.\ Theory Comput. 2020, 16, 6343--6357

    2020

  73. [81]

    M.;\ \ Sokolov, A

    Mazin, I. M.;\ \ Sokolov, A. Y. Multireference algebraic diagrammatic construction theory for excited states: Extended second-order implementation and benchmark. J. Chem.\ Theory Comput. 2021, 17, 6152--6165

    2021

  74. [82]

    Banerjee, S.;\ \ Sokolov, A. Y. Algebraic diagrammatic construction theory for simulating charged excited states and photoelectron spectra. J. Chem.\ Theory Comput. 2023, 19, 3037--3053

    2023

  75. [83]

    Hu, W.;\ \ Chan, G. K.-L. Excited-state geometry optimization with the density matrix renormalization group, as applied to polyenes. J. Chem.\ Theory Comput. 2015, 11, 3000--3009

    2015

  76. [84]

    Role of the dark 2ag state in donor--acceptor copolymers as a pathway for singlet fission: A dmrg study

    Ren, J.;\ \ Peng, Q.;\ \ Zhang, X.;\ \ Yi, Y.;\ \ Shuai, Z. Role of the dark 2ag state in donor--acceptor copolymers as a pathway for singlet fission: A dmrg study. J. Phys.\ Chem.\ Lett. 2017, 8, 2175--2181

    2017

  77. [85]

    The density matrix renormalization group in chemistry and molecular physics: Recent developments and new challenges

    Baiardi, A.;\ \ Reiher, M. The density matrix renormalization group in chemistry and molecular physics: Recent developments and new challenges. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2020, 152, 040903:1--22

    2020

  78. [86]

    Adapting algebraic diagrammatic construction schemes for the polarization propagator to problems with multi-reference electronic ground states exploiting the spin-flip ansatz

    Lefrancois, D.;\ \ Wormit, M.;\ \ Dreuw, A. Adapting algebraic diagrammatic construction schemes for the polarization propagator to problems with multi-reference electronic ground states exploiting the spin-flip ansatz. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2015, 143, 124107:1--10

    2015

  79. [87]

    R.;\ \ Dreuw, A

    Lefrancois, D.;\ \ Rehn, D. R.;\ \ Dreuw, A. Accurate adiabatic singlet-triplet gaps in atoms and molecules employing the third-order spin-flip algebraic diagrammatic construction scheme for the polarization propagator. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2016, 145, 084102:1--8

    2016

  80. [88]

    J.;\ \ Dreuw, A

    Lefrancois, D.;\ \ Tuna, D.;\ \ Mart\' nez, T. J.;\ \ Dreuw, A. The spin-flip variant of the algebraic-diagrammatic construction yields the correct topology of S _1 S _0 conical intersections. J. Chem.\ Theory Comput. 2017, 13, 4436--4441

    2017

  81. [89]

    I.;\ \ Sherrill, C

    Krylov, A. I.;\ \ Sherrill, C. D. Perturbative corrections to the equation-of-motion spin–flip self-consistent field model: Application to bond-breaking and equilibrium properties of diradicals. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2002, 116, 3194--3203

    2002

  82. [90]

    V.;\ \ Krylov, A

    Levchenko, S. V.;\ \ Krylov, A. I. Equation-of-motion spin-flip coupled-cluster model with single and double substitutions: Theory and application to cyclobutadiene. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2004, 120, 175--185

    2004

  83. [91]

    Krylov, A. I. Spin-flip equation-of-motion coupled-cluster electronic structure method for a description of excited states, bond breaking, diradicals, and triradicals. Acc.\ Chem.\ Res. 2005, 39, 83--91

    2005

  84. [92]

    Shao, Y.;\ \ Head-Gordon , M.;\ \ Krylov, A. I. The spin-flip approach within time-dependent density functional theory: Theory and applications to diradicals. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2003, 118, 4807--4818

    2003

  85. [93]

    A.;\ \ Shao, Y.;\ \ Krylov, A

    Bernard, Y. A.;\ \ Shao, Y.;\ \ Krylov, A. I. General formulation of spin-flip time-dependent density functional theory using non-collinear kernels: Theory , implementation, and benchmarks. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2012, 136, 204103:1--17

    2012

  86. [94]

    M.;\ \ Scuseria, G

    Stein, T.;\ \ Henderson, T. M.;\ \ Scuseria, G. E. Seniority zero pair coupled cluster doubles theory. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2014, 140, 214113:1--8

    2014

  87. [95]

    M.;\ \ Bulik, I

    Henderson, T. M.;\ \ Bulik, I. W.;\ \ Stein, T.;\ \ Scuseria, G. E. Seniority-based coupled cluster theory. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2014, 141, 244104:1--10

    2014

  88. [96]

    Brz e k, F.;\ \ Boguslawski, K.;\ \ Tecmer, P.;\ \ \.Z uchowski, P. S. Benchmarking the accuracy of seniority-zero wave function methods for noncovalent interactions. J. Chem.\ Theory Comput. 2019, 15, 4021--4035

    2019

  89. [97]

    Open-shell extensions to closed-shell pCCD

    Boguslawski, K. Open-shell extensions to closed-shell pCCD . Chem.\ Commun. 2021, 57, 12277--12280

    2021

  90. [98]

    Bartlett, R. J. Perspective on Coupled -cluster Theory . The evolution toward simplicity in quantum chemistry. Phys.\ Chem.\ Chem.\ Phys. 2024, 26, 8013--8037

    2024

  91. [99]

    Targeting excited states in all-trans polyenes with electron-pair states

    Boguslawski, K. Targeting excited states in all-trans polyenes with electron-pair states. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2016, 145, 234105:1--9

    2016

  92. [100]

    Targeting doubly excited states with equation of motion coupled cluster theory restricted to double excitations

    Boguslawski, K. Targeting doubly excited states with equation of motion coupled cluster theory restricted to double excitations. J. Chem.\ Theory Comput. 2019, 15, 18-24

    2019

  93. [101]

    Excited states from state-specific orbital-optimized pair coupled cluster

    Kossoski, F.;\ \ Marie, A.;\ \ Scemama, A.;\ \ Caffarel, M.;\ \ Loos, P.-F. Excited states from state-specific orbital-optimized pair coupled cluster. J. Chem.\ Theory Comput. 2021, 17, 4756--4768

    2021

  94. [102]

    Benchmarking ionization potentials from pCCD tailored coupled cluster models

    Ga y \'n ska, M.;\ \ Boguslawski, K. Benchmarking ionization potentials from pCCD tailored coupled cluster models. J. Chem.\ Theory Comput. 2024, 20, 4182--4195

    2024

  95. [103]

    Linear response p CCD -based methods: LR -p CCD and LR -p CCD + S approaches for the efficient and reliable modeling of excited state properties

    Ahmadkhani, S.;\ \ Boguslawski, K.;\ \ Tecmer, P. Linear response p CCD -based methods: LR -p CCD and LR -p CCD + S approaches for the efficient and reliable modeling of excited state properties. J. Chem.\ Theory Comput. 2024, 20, 10443--10452

    2024

  96. [104]

    M.;\ \ Mandal, A

    Herbert, J. M.;\ \ Mandal, A. Importance of orbital invariance in quantifying electron-hole separation and exciton size. J. Chem.\ Theory Comput. 2024, 20, 9446--9463

    2024

  97. [105]

    Assessing the accuracy of simplified coupled cluster methods for electronic excited states in f0 actinide compounds

    Nowak, A.;\ \ Tecmer, P.;\ \ Boguslawski, K. Assessing the accuracy of simplified coupled cluster methods for electronic excited states in f0 actinide compounds. Phys.\ Chem.\ Chem.\ Phys. 2019, 21, 19039--19053

    2019

  98. [106]

    S.;\ \ K e dziera, D

    Tecmer, P.;\ \ Boguslawski, K.;\ \ Borkowski, M.;\ \ \.Z uchowski, P. S.;\ \ K e dziera, D. Modeling the electronic structures of the ground and excited states of the ytterbium atom and the ytterbium dimer: A modern quantum chemistry perspective. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2019, 11...

    2019

  99. [107]

    Geminal-based strategies for modeling large building blocks of organic electronic materials

    Tecmer, P.;\ \ Ga yńska, M.;\ \ Szczuczko, L.;\ \ Boguslawski, K. Geminal-based strategies for modeling large building blocks of organic electronic materials. J. Phys.\ Chem.\ Lett. 2023, 14, 9909--9917

    2023

  100. [108]

    Can coupled-cluster theory treat conical intersections? J

    K\"ohn, A.;\ \ Tajti, A. Can coupled-cluster theory treat conical intersections? J. Chem.\ Phys. 2007, 127, 044105:1--9

    2007

  101. [109]

    F.;\ \ Koch, H

    Kj nstad, E. F.;\ \ Koch, H. Resolving the notorious case of conical intersections for coupled cluster dynamics. J. Phys.\ Chem.\ Lett. 2017, 8, 4801--4807

    2017

  102. [110]

    Schirmer, J.;\ \ Trofimov, A. B. Intermediate state representation approach to physical properties of electronically excited molecules. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2004, 120, 11449--11464

    2004

  103. [111]

    The algebraic diagrammatic construction scheme for the polarization propagator for the calculation of excited states

    Dreuw, A.;\ \ Wormit, M. The algebraic diagrammatic construction scheme for the polarization propagator for the calculation of excited states. WIREs Comput.\ Mol.\ Sci. 2015, 5, 82--95

    2015

  104. [112]

    R.;\ \ Dreuw, A

    Hodecker, M.;\ \ Rehn, D. R.;\ \ Dreuw, A. Hermitian second-order methods for excited electronic states: Unitary coupled cluster in comparison with algebraic–diagrammatic construction schemes. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2020, 152, 094106:1--12

    2020

  105. [113]

    Dreuw, A.;\ \ Papapostolou, A.;\ \ Dempwolff, A. L. Algebraic diagrammatic construction schemes employing the intermediate state formalism: Theory , capabilities, and interpretation. J. Phys.\ Chem. A 2023, 127, 6635--6646

    2023

  106. [114]

    Scheurer, M.;\ \ Papapostolou, A.;\ \ Fransson, T.;\ \ Norman, P.;\ \ Dreuw, A.;\ \ Rehn, D. R. Solving response expressions in the ADC / ISR framework. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2023, 158, 084105:1--11

    2023

  107. [115]

    L.;\ \ Rehn, D

    Hodecker, M.;\ \ Dempwolff, A. L.;\ \ Rehn, D. R.;\ \ Dreuw, A. Algebraic-diagrammatic construction scheme for the polarization propagator including ground-state coupled-cluster amplitudes. I . Excitation energies. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2019, 150, 174104:1--15

    2019

  108. [116]

    R.;\ \ Norman, P.;\ \ Dreuw, A

    Hodecker, M.;\ \ Rehn, D. R.;\ \ Norman, P.;\ \ Dreuw, A. Algebraic-diagrammatic construction scheme for the polarization propagator including ground-state coupled-cluster amplitudes. II . Static polarizabilities. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2019, 150, 174105:1--10

    2019

  109. [117]

    J.;\ \ Gonz \'a lez, L

    Zobel, P. J.;\ \ Gonz \'a lez, L. The quest to simulate excited-state dynamics of transition metal complexes. JACS Au 2021, 1, 1116--1140

    2021

  110. [118]

    On the solution of coupled-cluster equations in the fully correlated limit of cyclic polyene model

    Piecuch, P.;\ \ Paldus, J. On the solution of coupled-cluster equations in the fully correlated limit of cyclic polyene model. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1991, 40, 9--34

    1991

  111. [119]

    Kats, D.;\ \ Manby, F. R. Communication: The distinguishable cluster approximation. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2013, 139,

    2013

  112. [120]

    W.;\ \ Henderson, T

    Bulik, I. W.;\ \ Henderson, T. M.;\ \ Scuseria, G. E. Can single-reference coupled cluster theory describe static correlation? J. Chem.\ Theory Comput. 2015, 11, 3171--3179

    2015

  113. [121]

    Externally and internally corrected coupled cluster approaches: an overview

    Paldus, J. Externally and internally corrected coupled cluster approaches: an overview. J. Math. Chem. 2017, 55, 477--502

    2017

  114. [122]

    A.;\ \ Ayers, P

    Limacher, P. A.;\ \ Ayers, P. W.;\ \ Johnson, P. A.;\ \ De Baerdemacker, S.;\ \ Van Neck, D.;\ \ Bultinck, P. A new mean-field method suitable for strongly correlated electrons: Computationally facile antisymmetric products of nonorthogonal geminals. J. Chem.\ Theory Comput. 2...

    2013

  115. [123]

    A.;\ \ Limacher, P

    Tecmer, P.;\ \ Boguslawski, K.;\ \ Johnson, P. A.;\ \ Limacher, P. A.;\ \ Chan, M.;\ \ Verstraelen, T.;\ \ Ayers, P. W. Assessing the accuracy of new geminal-based approaches. J. Phys.\ Chem. A 2014, 118, 9058--9068

    2014

  116. [124]

    W.;\ \ Bultinck, P.;\ \ De Baerdemacker, S.;\ \ Van Neck, D

    Boguslawski, K.;\ \ Tecmer, P.;\ \ Ayers, P. W.;\ \ Bultinck, P.;\ \ De Baerdemacker, S.;\ \ Van Neck, D. Efficient description of strongly correlated electrons with mean-field cost. Phys.\ Rev. B 2014, 89, 201106:1--4

    2014

  117. [125]

    A.;\ \ Johnson, P

    Boguslawski, K.;\ \ Tecmer, P.;\ \ Limacher, P. A.;\ \ Johnson, P. A.;\ \ Ayers, P. W.;\ \ Bultinck, P.;\ \ De Baerdemacker, S.;\ \ Van Neck, D. Projected seniority-two orbital optimization of the antisymmetric product of one-reference orbital geminal. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2014, 140,

    2014

  118. [126]

    Boguslawski, K.;\ \ Tecmer, P.;\ \ Bultinck, P.;\ \ De Baerdemacker, S.;\ \ Van Neck, D.;\ \ Ayers, P. W. Nonvariational orbital optimization techniques for the AP 1ro G wave function. J. Chem.\ Theory Comput. 2014, 10, 4873--4882

    2014

  119. [127]

    A.;\ \ Kim, T

    Limacher, P. A.;\ \ Kim, T. D.;\ \ Ayers, P. W.;\ \ Johnson, P. A.;\ \ De Baerdemacker, S.;\ \ Van Neck, D.;\ \ Bultinck, P. The influence of orbital rotation on the energy of closed-shell wavefunctions. Mol.\ Phys. 2014, 112, 853--862

    2014

  120. [128]

    Assessing the accuracy of tailored coupled cluster methods corrected by electronic wave functions of polynomial cost

    Leszczyk, A.;\ \ M \'a t \'e , M.;\ \ Legeza, \"O .;\ \ Boguslawski, K. Assessing the accuracy of tailored coupled cluster methods corrected by electronic wave functions of polynomial cost. J. Chem.\ Theory Comput. 2022, 18, 96-117 PMID: 34965121

    2022

  121. [129]

    A.;\ \ Henderson, T

    Gomez, J. A.;\ \ Henderson, T. M.;\ \ Scuseria, G. E. Recoupling the singlet- and triplet-pairing channels in single-reference coupled cluster theory. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2016, 145, 134103:1--7

    2016

  122. [130]

    Lotrich, V.;\ \ Bartlett, R. J. External coupled-cluster perturbation theory: Description and application to weakly interaction dimers. corrections to the random phase approximation. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2011, 134,

    2011

  123. [131]

    Thouless, D. J. Stability conditions and nuclear rotations in the Hartree - Fock theory. Nucl.\ Phys. 1960, 21, 225--232

    1960

  124. [132]

    F.;\ \ Gauss, J.;\ \ Bartlett, R

    Stanton, J. F.;\ \ Gauss, J.;\ \ Bartlett, R. J. On the choice of orbitals for symmetry breaking problems with application to no3. J. Chem.\ Phys. 1992, 97, 5554--5559

    1992

  125. [133]

    B.;\ \ Hedman, B.;\ \ Hodgson, K

    Sarangi, R.;\ \ Aboelella, N.;\ \ Fujisawa, K.;\ \ Tolman, W. B.;\ \ Hedman, B.;\ \ Hodgson, K. O.;\ \ Solomon, E. I. X-ray absorption edge spectroscopy and computational studies on LCuO _ 2 species: Superoxide - Cu ^ II versus peroxide- Cu ^ III bonding. J. Am.\ Chem.\ Soc. 2...

    2006

  126. [134]

    Dunning, Jr. , T. H. Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. I . The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen. J. Chem.\ Phys. 1989, 90, 1007--1023

    1989

  127. [135]

    An improved chain of spheres for exchange algorithm

    Helmich-Paris , B.;\ \ de Souza , B.;\ \ Neese, F.;\ \ Izs\'ak, R. An improved chain of spheres for exchange algorithm. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2021, 155, 104109:1--14

    2021

  128. [136]

    Long-range corrected hybrid density functionals with damped atom--atom dispersion corrections

    Chai, J.-D.;\ \ Head-Gordon , M. Long-range corrected hybrid density functionals with damped atom--atom dispersion corrections. Phys.\ Chem.\ Chem.\ Phys. 2008, 10, 6615--6620

    2008

  129. [137]

    Lebedev, V. I. Values of the nodes and weights of ninth to seventeenth order Gauss - Markov quadrature formulae invariant under the octahedron group with inversion. Zh.\ v\= y chisl.\ Mat.\ mat.\ Fiz. 1975, 16, 293--306

    1975

  130. [138]

    Lebedev, V. I. Values of the nodes and weights of ninth to seventeenth order Gauss - Markov quadrature formulae invariant under the octahedron group with inversion. USSR Comp.\ Math.\ Math+ 1975, 15, 44--51

    1975

  131. [139]

    A mountaineering strategy to excited states: Highly accurate reference energies and benchmarks

    Loos, P.-F.;\ \ Scemama, A.;\ \ Blondel, A.;\ \ Garniron, Y.;\ \ Caffarel, M.;\ \ Jacquemin, D. A mountaineering strategy to excited states: Highly accurate reference energies and benchmarks. J. Chem.\ Theory Comput. 2018, 14, 4360--4379

    2018

  132. [140]

    Accurate Coulomb -fitting basis sets for H to Rn

    Weigend, F. Accurate Coulomb -fitting basis sets for H to Rn . Phys.\ Chem.\ Chem.\ Phys. 2006, 8, 1057--1065

    2006

  133. [141]

    et al.\ Software for the frontiers of quantum chemistry: An overview of developments in the Q - Chem 5 package

    Epifanovsky, E. et al.\ Software for the frontiers of quantum chemistry: An overview of developments in the Q - Chem 5 package. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2021, 155, 084801:1--59

    2021

  134. [142]

    Software update: the ORCA program system, version 5.0

    Neese, F. Software update: the ORCA program system, version 5.0. WIRES Comput. Molec. Sci. 2022, 12, e1606

    2022

  135. [143]

    S.;\ \ K e dziera, D.;\ \ Tecmer, P

    Boguslawski, K.;\ \ Leszczyk, A.;\ \ Nowak, A.;\ \ Brz e k, F.;\ \ \.Z uchowski, P. S.;\ \ K e dziera, D.;\ \ Tecmer, P. Pythonic black-box electronic structure tool ( P y BEST ). an open-source python platform for electronic structure calculations at the interface between che...

    2021

  136. [144]

    H.;\ \ Żuchowski, P

    Boguslawski, K.;\ \ Brzęk, F.;\ \ Chakraborty, R.;\ \ Cieślak, K.;\ \ Jahani, S.;\ \ Leszczyk, A.;\ \ Nowak, A.;\ \ Sujkowski, E.;\ \ Świerczyński, J.;\ \ Ahmadkhani, S.;\ \ Kędziera, D.;\ \ Kriebel, M. H.;\ \ Żuchowski, P. S.;\ \ Tecmer, P. P y BEST : Improved functionality a...

    2024

  137. [145]

    C.;\ \ Blunt, N

    Sun, Q.;\ \ Berkelbach, T. C.;\ \ Blunt, N. S.;\ \ Booth, G. H.;\ \ Guo, S.;\ \ Li, Z.;\ \ Liu, J.;\ \ McClain , J. D.;\ \ Sayfutyarova, E. R.;\ \ Sharma, S.;\ \ Wouters, S.;\ \ Chan, G. K. L. PySCF : The Python -based simulations of chemistry framework. WIREs Comput.\ Mol.\ S...

    2017

  138. [146]

    et al.\ Recent developments in the pyscf program package

    Sun, Q. et al.\ Recent developments in the pyscf program package. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2020, 153, 024109:1--20

    2020

  139. [147]

    L.;\ \ Sokolov, A

    Stahl, T. L.;\ \ Sokolov, A. Y. Quantifying spin contamination in algebraic diagrammatic construction theory of electronic excitations. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2024, 160, 204104

    2024

  140. [148]

    Keller, E.;\ \ Tsatsoulis, T.;\ \ Reuter, K.;\ \ Margraf, J. T. Regularized second-order correlation methods for extended systems. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2022, 156, 024106:1--8

    2022

  141. [149]

    Coveney, C. J. N.;\ \ Tew, D. P. A regularized second-order correlation method from Green's function theory. J. Chem.\ Theory Comput. 2023,

    2023

  142. [150]

    M.;\ \ Bulik, I

    Henderson, T. M.;\ \ Bulik, I. W.;\ \ Scuseria, G. E. Pair extended coupled cluster doubles. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2015, 142, 214116

    2015

  143. [151]

    C.;\ \ Tremblay, A.-M

    Delannoy, J.-Y.;\ \ Gingras, M.;\ \ Holdsworth, P. C.;\ \ Tremblay, A.-M. Low-energy theory of the t- t'- t ''- U H ubbard model at half-filling: Interaction strengths in cuprate superconductors and an effective spin-only description of L a _2 C u O _4 . Phys.\ Rev. B 2009, 79, 235130

    2009

  144. [152]

    The H ubbard model: A computational perspective

    Qin, M.;\ \ Sch \"a fer, T.;\ \ Andergassen, S.;\ \ Corboz, P.;\ \ Gull, E. The H ubbard model: A computational perspective. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 2022, 13, 275--302

    2022

  145. [153]

    C.;\ \ Horton, M

    Moore, G. C.;\ \ Horton, M. K.;\ \ Linscott, E.;\ \ Ganose, A. M.;\ \ Siron, M.;\ \ O'Regan, D. D.;\ \ Persson, K. A. High-throughput determination of H ubbard U and H und J values for transition metal oxides via the linear response formalism. Phys.\ Rev.\ Mater. 2024, 8, 014409

    2024

  146. [154]

    Analysis of two-orbital correlations in wave functions restricted to electron-pair states

    Boguslawski, K.;\ \ Tecmer, P.;\ \ Legeza, \"O . Analysis of two-orbital correlations in wave functions restricted to electron-pair states. Phys.\ Rev. B 2016, 94, 155126

    2016

  147. [155]

    Orbital entanglement and correlation from pccd-tailored coupled cluster wave functions

    Nowak, A.;\ \ Legeza, \"O .;\ \ Boguslawski, K. Orbital entanglement and correlation from pccd-tailored coupled cluster wave functions. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2021, 154,

    2021

  148. [156]

    Rishi, V.;\ \ Perera, A.;\ \ Bartlett, R. J. Assessing the distinguishable cluster approximation based on the triple bond-breaking in the nitrogen molecule. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2016, 144,

    2016

  149. [157]

    F.;\ \ Bartlett, R

    Stanton, J. F.;\ \ Bartlett, R. J. The equation of motion coupled-cluster method. A systematic biorthogonal approach to molecular excitation energies, transition probabilities, and excited state properties. J. Chem.\ Phys. 1993, 98, 7029--7039

    1993

  150. [158]

    Calculation of size‐intensive transition moments from the coupled cluster singles and doubles linear response function

    Koch, H.;\ \ Kobayashi, R.;\ \ Sanchez de Mer \'a s , A.;\ \ J rgensen, P. Calculation of size‐intensive transition moments from the coupled cluster singles and doubles linear response function. J. Chem.\ Phys. 1994, 100, 4393--4400

    1994

  151. [159]

    Tuna, D.;\ \ Lefrancois, D.;\ \ Wola\'nski, .;\ \ Gozem, S.;\ \ Schapiro, I.;\ \ Andruni\'ow, T.;\ \ Dreuw, A.;\ \ Olivucci, M. Assessment of approximate coupled-cluster and algebraic-diagrammatic-construction methods for ground- and excited-state reaction paths and the conica...

    2015

  152. [160]

    F.;\ \ Koch, H

    Kj nstad, E. F.;\ \ Koch, H. An orbital invariant similarity constrained coupled cluster model. J. Chem.\ Theory Comput. 2019, 15, 5386--5397

    2019

  153. [161]

    Zhang, X.;\ \ Herbert, J. M. Nonadiabatic dynamics with spin-flip versus linear-response time-dependent density functional theory: A case study for the protonated Schiff base C _5 H _6 NH _2^+ . J. Chem.\ Phys. 2021, 155, 124111:1--15

    2021

  154. [162]

    Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn : D esign and assessment of accuracy

    Weigend, F.;\ \ Ahlrichs, R. Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn : D esign and assessment of accuracy. Phys.\ Chem.\ Chem.\ Phys. 2005, 7, 3297--3305

    2005

  155. [163]

    R.;\ \ Sauer, S

    Schreiber, M.;\ \ Silva-Junior , M. R.;\ \ Sauer, S. P. A.;\ \ Thiel, W. Benchmarks for electronically excited states: CASPT2 , CC2 , CCSD , and CC3 . J. Chem.\ Phys. 2008, 128, 134110:1--25

    2008

  156. [164]

    K.-L.;\ \ K \'a llay, M.;\ \ Gauss, J

    Chan, G. K.-L.;\ \ K \'a llay, M.;\ \ Gauss, J. State-of-the-art density matrix renormalization group and coupled cluster theory studies of the nitrogen binding curve. J. Chem.\ Phys. 2004, 121, 6110--6116

    2004

  157. [165]

    Orbital entanglement in bond-formation processes

    Boguslawski, K.;\ \ Tecmer, P.;\ \ Barcza, G.;\ \ Legeza, \"O .;\ \ Reiher, M. Orbital entanglement in bond-formation processes. J. Chem.\ Theory Comput. 2013, 9, 2959--2973

    2013

  158. [166]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry add.period write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence skip FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1 'skip ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.