Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 53 references

Tightly-confined and long Z-cut lithium niobate waveguide with ultralow-loss

T0 review · 4 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Z-cut lithium niobate waveguides hit 5.8 dB/m loss and host the first octave-spanning all-normal-dispersion supercontinuum in an integrated LN waveguide.

desk verdict Genuine fabrication advance with a record loss figure and the first ANDi octave-spanning supercontinuum in integrated LN, but the loss is not mode-selective and the coherence is inferred rather than measured. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.18341 v1 pith:OKIRXULH submitted 2025-01-30 physics.optics physics.app-ph

Yan Gao , Yi Sun , Israel Rebolledo-Salgado , Raphael Van Laer , Victor Torres-Company , Jochen Schroder This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-ph
keywords lithiumniobateLNOIwaveguidesultralowpropagationlossZ-cutall-normaldispersionsupercontinuumgenerationopticalfrequency-domainreflectometryintegratedphotonics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a fabrication process for fully etched, tightly confined Z-cut lithium niobate (LN) waveguides and claims two advances enabled by it. The first is a propagation loss of 5.8 dB/m measured in a 15 cm spiral, the lowest loss directly measured in a decimeter-long LN waveguide. The second is the first all-normal-dispersion octave-spanning supercontinuum generated in an integrated LN waveguide, obtained in a 30 cm device pumped at 1560 nm. These results matter because they combine low loss, strong confinement, and dispersion control in one chip-scale platform, removing a barrier for nonlinear and phase-sensitive LN photonics.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is a fully etched strip waveguide in a 600 nm Z-cut lithium-niobate-on-insulator film, operated in the quasi-TE mode so that bent sections do not convert TE into TM energy. The fabrication combines a thin adhesion layer, negative-tone electron-beam lithography with multipass exposure for smooth sidewalls, and argon ion-beam etching with thermal management to reach a sidewall angle around 70 degrees. Long spirals are built from Archimedean units each contained in a single writing field, joined by S-bends whose curvature is a cubic polynomial of arc length, $\kappa(s)=a_0+a_1s+a_2s^2+a_3s^3$, which keeps mode coupling low. Loss is read out with optical frequency-domain reflectometry, and dispersion is engineered through the 2.7 $\mu$m by 0.6 $\mu$m cross-section so that the waveguide is all-normal-dispersion, which preserves coherence during supercontinuum generation.

What would settle it

Measure the output mode profile and polarization extinction of the 15 cm and 30 cm spirals: if a measurable TM component or a second transverse mode appears after propagation, the claim that Z-cut TE avoids birefringence-induced intermode coupling would be contradicted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that choosing the Z-cut crystal orientation and operating in the quasi-TE mode eliminates the material-birefringence penalty that distorts modes in bent X-cut LN waveguides, so a fully etched strip waveguide can be both tightly confining and ultralow loss. On this platform, optical frequency-domain reflectometry yields 5.8 dB/m over a 15 cm spiral, and 207 pJ pulses produce a spectrum spanning more than an octave in a 30 cm all-normal-dispersion waveguide. The authors argue this makes the waveguide a practical building block for on-chip delay lines, narrow-linewidth lasers, parametric amplifiers, and $\chi^3$ nonlinear devices.

Load-bearing premise

The platform relies on the assumption that the quasi-TE mode stays single-mode and polarization-pure throughout the 15-30 cm spiral, yet the paper tests this only in a simulation of one bend rather than on a real long waveguide.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Decimeter-long ultralow-loss LN spirals become practical for on-chip delay lines and laser cavities, since a 15 cm path adds under 1 dB of propagation loss.
  • Z-cut TE geometry removes the single-direction layout restriction caused by birefringence, so dispersion-engineered and phase-sensitive components can be arranged freely on a chip.
  • An octave-spanning all-normal-dispersion supercontinuum in an integrated LN waveguide offers a path toward chip-scale self-referenced frequency combs without the coherence degradation seen in anomalous-dispersion supercontinuum.
  • The same fabrication flow is expected to carry over to X-cut LN, preserving access to the largest electro-optic and second-order nonlinear coefficients.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 5.8 dB/m loss persists at multi-decimeter lengths, Z-cut LN could compete with silicon nitride in delay-line and narrow-linewidth applications while adding strong quadratic and cubic nonlinearity; the paper does not quantify those trade-offs.
  • A direct measurement of output mode purity and polarization extinction along the 30 cm waveguide would convert the single-bend simulation argument into an experimental guarantee that birefringence is fully avoided.
  • The coherence of the octave-spanning spectrum is assumed from the all-normal-dispersion regime rather than measured; a pulse-to-pulse interferometric measurement would test that assumption directly.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper reports a fabrication process for fully etched Z-cut lithium niobate (LN) waveguides and claims a record-low propagation loss of 5.8 dB/m measured by optical frequency-domain reflectometry (OFDR) in a 15 cm spiral waveguide. It also demonstrates supercontinuum generation in a 30 cm, 2.7 µm-wide all-normal-dispersion (ANDi) waveguide, reaching an octave-spanning spectrum at ~207 pJ on-chip pump energy, and labels the supercontinuum as coherent. The central design idea is that Z-cut LN with TE polarization avoids the direction-dependent birefringence that causes intermode coupling in X-cut bent waveguides, supported by a finite-element simulation of a single bend (Fig. 1(b)). The paper includes detailed fabrication steps, loss measurements versus width and wavelength, and a dispersion simulation.

Significance. If the claims hold, this would be a notable advance for LN photonics: a decimeter-long, tightly confined waveguide with dB/m-level loss would benefit delay lines, narrow-linewidth lasers, and parametric devices, and an ANDi octave-spanning supercontinuum in an integrated LN waveguide would be a first. The fabrication methodology (multipass EBL, thermal management, single-writing-field spiral design) and the direct OFDR loss extraction are useful contributions. However, the current evidence is incomplete in a load-bearing way: the waveguides used for both headline results are explicitly multimode, yet no experimental characterization of mode or polarization purity along the long spirals is provided, and the supercontinuum coherence is inferred rather than measured. The significance is therefore conditional on additional verification.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3, Fig. 1(b), Fig. 3(a)]
  2. [Section 3, Fig. 3(a)–(d)]
  3. [Section 4, Fig. 4(c)]
  4. [Section 4, experimental setup]
minor comments (7)
  1. [Abstract/Introduction]
  2. [Section 4]
  3. [Funding]
  4. [Section 3, Fig. 3(c),(d)]
  5. [Section 3, Fig. 3(a)]
  6. [References]
  7. [Section 2]

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular reduction: loss and supercontinuum are direct measurements, not fitted predictions.

full rationale

The paper's central quantitative results are obtained by direct measurement rather than by deriving a prediction from an input that already contains the answer. The 5.8 dB/m propagation loss is extracted by optical frequency-domain reflectometry as a linear fit to backscattered power versus length along a 15-cm spiral waveguide; this is a measurement of Rayleigh backscattering, not a prediction from a fitted model whose parameters are equivalent to the loss. The octave-spanning supercontinuum is a measured output spectrum at increasing pump energies, and the all-normal-dispersion interpretation is supported by an independent finite-element simulation of the waveguide dispersion and by published ANDi coherence theory. The coherence references include prior work by some of the same authors in Si3N4 waveguides, but that cited work is a separate published experimental result, not an unverified premise or a theorem that already asserts the present conclusion; it is used as external support for the expected coherence properties of ANDi supercontinuum. The paper also explicitly acknowledges that its low-loss waveguides are multimode at large widths, and the assumption of maintained TE00 polarization purity along the long spirals is not experimentally verified. That is a validity or robustness limitation, not a circularity: no equation in the paper defines the reported loss or bandwidth in terms of the claimed result, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained with respect to the stated measurements, and the remaining concerns are experimental verification gaps rather than circular reasoning.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a handful of unverified modeling and measurement assumptions. The most important are the accuracy of OFDR for loss extraction, the extrapolation of ANDi coherence from prior work, and the single-mode polarization purity of the Z-cut TE design. The on-chip pump energy for the supercontinuum depends on a hand-estimated coupling loss of about 10 dB.

free parameters (1)
  • Input coupling loss = ~10 dB (estimated)
    Used to convert measured free-space input power to on-chip pump power and pulse energy; the on-chip energy of 207 pJ for octave spanning depends on this estimate.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption OFDR based on Rayleigh scattering provides an accurate measure of distributed propagation loss.
    The entire loss characterization in Section 3 relies on this measurement technique; no independent verification by cutback or resonator Q-factor is provided.
  • domain assumption All-normal-dispersion (ANDi) supercontinuum maintains coherence over long propagation lengths and high pulse energies.
    Invoked in Section 4 with Refs [42-44] to label the measured spectrum as 'coherent' without a direct coherence measurement.
  • domain assumption The Z-cut TE mode does not suffer from intermode crosstalk or polarization rotation in bent waveguides.
    Supported only by simulation in Fig. 1(b); no experimental polarization extinction measurement is reported.
  • domain assumption The design parameters (width, height, bending radius) used in FEM simulation model the fabricated device accurately.
    Simulated dispersion in Fig. 2(f) is used to claim dispersion engineering, but no measurement of dispersion is shown.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tightly-confined and long Z-cut lithium niobate waveguide with ultralow-loss." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OKIRXULH

@misc{pith2026250118341,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tightly-confined and long Z-cut lithium niobate waveguide with ultralow-loss},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OKIRXULH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.18341}
}
abstract

Lithium niobate (LN) is a promising material for future complex photonic-electronic circuits, with wide applications in fields like data communications, sensing, optical computation, and quantum optics. There was a great step toward LN photonic integrated circuits (PICs) with the development of dry etching for low-loss LN on insulator (LNOI) waveguides. However, the versatility of the LN waveguide platform for applications like $\chi^3$ nonlinear devices and passive phase sensitive components, has not been fully utilized. The main challenges are the difficulty of making highly confined ultralow-loss waveguides and overcoming the strong material birefringence. Here, we developed a fabrication technology for an ultralow-loss, tightly-confined, dispersion-engineered LN waveguide. We demonstrated an ultra-low propagation loss of 5.8 dB/m in a decimeter-long LN spiral waveguide. We focused on Z-cut LN waveguides with TE mode to avoid the material birefringence. Aiming for $\chi^3$ nonlinear applications, we demonstrated the first all normal-dispersion (ANDi) based coherent octave-spanning supercontinuum frequency comb in integrated LN waveguide. Our ultralow-loss Z-cut LN long waveguide might be useful in on-chip narrow linewidth lasers, optical delay lines, and parametric amplifiers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.18341 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) The simulated optical field (Z component) dis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Fabrication flow chart for fully etched LN waveguide. (b) SEM image of LN ring resonators and (e) zoomed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) OFDR measurement results for a 15 cm long waveguide. (b) Experimental setup. (c) Measured losses with different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Experimental setup for supercontinuum generation, the light is free-space couled onto the chips. (b) Picture for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Introduction Photonic integrated circuits [1] (PICs) enable on-chip light generation, manipulation, and detection. Via in- tegration and miniturization, PICs shows great potential for realizing low-cost and scalable optical systems in fields like data communication, bio-chemical sensing, and op- tical computation. In recent decades, different material pla...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Tightly-confined and long Z-cut lithium niobate waveguide with ultralow-loss

    Z-cut LN long waveguide platform LN is a well-known anisotropic material, in which the nonlinear and EO coefficients vary largely in different di- rections. To take advantage of the largest EO (r 33 ) or second order nonlinear coefficient (d 33 ), most work has focused on the TE polarization in X-cut LN waveguides. However, the strong birefringence limits...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    Losses characterization We fabricated long spiral waveguides to characterize the propagation losses. Fig. 2(c) shows a microscope image for a fabricated spiral waveguide. The spiral shape reduces the footprint for the entire de- vice. We minimize stiching errors (and thus extra losses), by intentionally fitting each spiral unit into a single writ- ing fil...

    work page 2000

  4. [4]

    The device used for the experiment includes 6 cascaded spiral units with around 5 cm length for each

    Nonlinear applications based onχ3 We study supercontinuum generation in an all-normal dispersion LN waveguide with geometry of 2.7 × 0.6 µm2 and length of 30 cm. The device used for the experiment includes 6 cascaded spiral units with around 5 cm length for each. The measurement setup is shown in Fig 4. (a). A 50 femtosecond mode lock laser (MLL) with a c...

    work page

  5. [5]

    We focused on Z-cut LN to avoid the material anisotropy, but the fabrication tech- nology is not limited to only Z-cut LN

    Conclusion In conclusion, a LN waveguide fabrication technology has been developed to realize a fully-etched strip LN waveguide with advantages for simultaneously achiev- ing ultra-low propagation losses, strong light confinement and dispersion engineering. We focused on Z-cut LN to avoid the material anisotropy, but the fabrication tech- nology is not li...

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    David, Z

    T. David, Z. Aaron, B. John E, T. Komljenovic, R. Gra- ham T, V. Laurent, M.-M. Delphine, C. Eric, V. L´ eopold, F. Jean-Marc, H. Jean-Michel, S. Jens H, X. Dan-Xia, B. Fr´ ed´ eric, O. Peter, M. Goran Z, and N. M, Roadmap on silicon photonics, J. Opt. 18, 073003 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Jalali and S

    B. Jalali and S. Fathpour, Silicon photonics, J. Light. Technol. 24, 4600 (2006)

    work page 2006

  8. [8]

    M. Smit, K. Williams, and J. Van Der Tol, Past, present, and future of inp-based photonic integration, Apl Pho- tonics 4 (2019)

    work page 2019

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    Y. Xuan, Y. Liu, L. T. Varghese, A. J. Metcalf, X. Xue, P.-H. Wang, K. Han, J. A. Jaramillo-Villegas, A. Al No- man, C. Wang, et al., High-q silicon nitride microres- onators exhibiting low-power frequency comb initiation, Optica 3, 1171 (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    X. Ji, F. A. Barbosa, S. P. Roberts, A. Dutt, J. Carde- nas, Y. Okawachi, A. Bryant, A. L. Gaeta, and M. Lip- son, Ultra-low-loss on-chip resonators with sub-milliwatt parametric oscillation threshold, Optica 4, 619 (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    J. Liu, A. S. Raja, M. Karpov, B. Ghadiani, M. H. Pfeiffer, B. Du, N. J. Engelsen, H. Guo, M. Zervas, and T. J. Kippenberg, Ultralow-power chip-based soliton mi- crocombs for photonic integration, Optica5, 1347 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    Z. Ye, K. Twayana, P. A. Andrekson, and V. Torres- Company, High-q si3n4 microresonators based on a sub- tractive processing for kerr nonlinear optics, Opt. Express 27, 35719 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    M. Pu, L. Ottaviano, E. Semenova, and K. Yvind, Effi- cient frequency comb generation in algaas-on-insulator, Optica 3, 823 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    Chang, W

    L. Chang, W. Xie, H. Shu, Q.-F. Yang, B. Shen, A. Boes, J. D. Peters, W. Jin, C. Xiang, S. Liu, et al., Ultra- efficient frequency comb generation in algaas-on-insulator microresonators, Nat. Commun. 11, 1331 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    H. Jung, K. Y. Fong, C. Xiong, and H. X. Tang, Elec- trical tuning and switching of an optical frequency comb generated in aluminum nitride microring resonators, Opt. Lett. 39, 84 (2013)

    2013

  8. [16]

    M. A. Guidry, K. Y. Yang, D. M. Lukin, A. Markosyan, J. Yang, M. M. Fejer, and J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, Optical paramet- ric oscillation in silicon carbide nanophotonics, Optica 7, 1139 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Zhang, C

    M. Zhang, C. Wang, R. Cheng, A. Shams-Ansari, and M. Lonˇ car, Monolithic ultra-high-Q lithium niobate mi- croring resonator, Optica 4, 1536 (2017)

    2017

  10. [18]

    He, Q.-F

    Y. He, Q.-F. Yang, J. Ling, R. Luo, H. Liang, M. Li, B. Shen, H. Wang, K. J. Vahala, and Q. Lin, Self-starting bi-chromatic LiNbO3 soliton microcomb, Optica 6, 1138 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    Z. Gong, X. Liu, Y. Xu, M. Xu, J. B. Surya, J. Lu, A. Bruch, C. Zou, and H. X. Tang, Soliton microcomb generation at 2 µm in z-cut lithium niobate microring resonators, Opt. Lett. 44, 3182 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    Y. Gao, F. Lei, M. Girardi, Z. Ye, R. Van Laer, V. Torres- Company, and J. Schr¨ oder, Compact lithium niobate mi- croring resonators in the ultrahigh q/v regime, Opt. Lett. 6 48, 3949 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    D. Zhu, L. Shao, M. Yu, R. Cheng, B. Desiatov, C. Xin, Y. Hu, J. Holzgrafe, S. Ghosh, A. Shams- Ansari, E. Puma, N. Sinclair, C. Reimer, M. Zhang, and M. Lonˇ car, Integrated photonics on thin-film lithium nio- bate, Adv. Opt. Photonics 13, 242 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    Qi and Y

    Y. Qi and Y. Li, Integrated lithium niobate photonics, Nanophotonics 9, 1287 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    Honardoost, K

    A. Honardoost, K. Abdelsalam, and S. Fathpour, Reju- venating a versatile photonic material: thin-film lithium niobate, Laser Photonics Rev. 14, 2000088 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    Weis and T

    R. Weis and T. Gaylord, Lithium niobate: Summary of physical properties and crystal structure, Appl. Phys. A 37, 191 (1985)

    1985

  17. [25]

    C. Wang, M. Zhang, X. Chen, M. Bertrand, A. Shams- Ansari, S. Chandrasekhar, P. Winzer, and M. Lonˇ car, Integrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators op- erating at CMOS-compatible voltages, Nature 562, 101 (2018)

    2018

  18. [26]

    M. He, M. Xu, Y. Ren, J. Jian, Z. Ruan, Y. Xu, S. Gao, S. Sun, X. Wen, L. Zhou, L. Liu, C. Guo, H. Chen, S. Yu, L. Liu, and X. Cai, High-performance hybrid silicon and lithium niobate Mach–Zehnder modulators for 100 gbit s- 1 and beyond, Nat. Photonics 13, 359 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    Zhang, B

    M. Zhang, B. Buscaino, C. Wang, A. Shams-Ansari, C. Reimer, R. Zhu, J. M. Kahn, and M. Lonˇ car, Broadband electro-optic frequency comb generation in a lithium niobate microring resonator, Nature 568, 373 (2019)

    2019

  20. [28]

    J. Lu, J. B. Surya, X. Liu, A. W. Bruch, Z. Gong, Y. Xu, and H. X. Tang, Periodically poled thin-film lithium nio- bate microring resonators with a second-harmonic gener- ation efficiency of 250,000%/W, Optica 6, 1455 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    Chen, Z.-H

    J.-Y. Chen, Z.-H. Ma, Y. M. Sua, Z. Li, C. Tang, and Y.-P. Huang, Ultra-efficient frequency conversion in quasi-phase-matched lithium niobate microrings, Optica 6, 1244 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    Nehra, R

    R. Nehra, R. Sekine, L. Ledezma, Q. Guo, R. M. Gray, A. Roy, and A. Marandi, Few-cycle vacuum squeezing in nanophotonics, arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.06768 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  23. [31]

    J. Zhao, C. Ma, M. R¨ using, and S. Mookherjea, High quality entangled photon pair generation in periodically poled thin-film lithium niobate waveguides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 163603 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    J. Lu, A. Al Sayem, Z. Gong, J. B. Surya, C.-L. Zou, and H. X. Tang, Ultralow-threshold thin-film lithium niobate optical parametric oscillator, Optica 8, 539 (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    T. P. McKenna, H. S. Stokowski, V. Ansari, J. Mishra, M. Jankowski, C. J. Sarabalis, J. F. Herrmann, C. Lan- grock, M. M. Fejer, and A. H. Safavi-Naeini, Ultra-low- power second-order nonlinear optics on a chip, Nat. Com- mun. 13, 4532 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    Xiang, W

    C. Xiang, W. Jin, J. Guo, J. D. Peters, M. Kennedy, J. Selvidge, P. A. Morton, and J. E. Bowers, Narrow- linewidth iii-v/si/si 3 n 4 laser using multilayer hetero- geneous integration, Optica 7, 20 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    H. Lee, T. Chen, J. Li, O. Painter, and K. J. Vahala, Ultra-low-loss optical delay line on a silicon chip, Nat. Commun. 3, 867 (2012)

    2012

  28. [36]

    S. Hong, L. Zhang, Y. Wang, M. Zhang, Y. Xie, and D. Dai, Ultralow-loss compact silicon photonic waveguide spirals and delay lines, Photonics Res. 10, 1 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    X. Ji, X. Yao, Y. Gan, A. Mohanty, M. A. Tadayon, C. P. Hendon, and M. Lipson, On-chip tunable photonic delay line, APL Photonics 4 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    Z. Ye, P. Zhao, K. Twayana, M. Karlsson, V. Torres- Company, and P. A. Andrekson, Overcoming the quan- tum limit of optical amplification in monolithic waveg- uides, Sci. Adv. 7, eabi8150 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    Kazama, T

    T. Kazama, T. Umeki, S. Shimizu, T. Kashiwazaki, K. Enbutsu, R. Kasahara, Y. Miyamoto, and K. Watan- abe, Over-30-db gain and 1-db noise figure phase- sensitive amplification using a pump-combiner-integrated fiber i/o ppln module, Opt. Express 29, 28824 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    J. F. Bauters, M. J. Heck, D. John, D. Dai, M.-C. Tien, J. S. Barton, A. Leinse, R. G. Heideman, D. J. Blumen- thal, and J. E. Bowers, Ultra-low-loss high-aspect-ratio si 3 n 4 waveguides, Optics express 19, 3163 (2011)

    2011

  33. [41]

    J. Liu, G. Huang, R. N. Wang, J. He, A. S. Raja, T. Liu, N. J. Engelsen, and T. J. Kippenberg, High-yield, wafer- scale fabrication of ultralow-loss, dispersion-engineered silicon nitride photonic circuits, Nat. Commun. 12, 2236 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    B. Pan, Y. Tan, P. Chen, L. Liu, Y. Shi, and D. Dai, Compact racetrack resonator on linbo 3, J. Light. Tech- nol. 39, 1770 (2020)

    2020

  35. [43]

    J. Yi, C. Guo, Z. Ruan, G. Chen, H. Wei, L. Lu, S. Gong, X. Pan, X. Shen, X. Guan, et al., Anisotropy-free ar- rayed waveguide gratings on x-cut thin film lithium nio- bate platform of in-plane anisotropy, Light Sci. Appl. 13, 147 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    T. Chen, H. Lee, J. Li, and K. J. Vahala, A general design algorithm for low optical loss adiabatic connections in waveguides, Opt. Express 20, 22819 (2012)

    2012

  37. [45]

    Z. Ye, F. Lei, K. Twayana, M. Girardi, P. A. Andrekson, and V. Torres-Company, Integrated, ultra-compact high- q silicon nitride microresonators for low-repetition-rate soliton microcombs, Laser Photonics Rev. 16, 2100147 (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    Liang, Q

    C. Liang, Q. Bai, M. Yan, Y. Wang, H. Zhang, and B. Jin, A comprehensive study of optical frequency domain re- flectometry, IEEE Access 9, 41647 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    Finot, B

    C. Finot, B. Kibler, L. Provost, and S. Wabnitz, Ben- eficial impact of wave-breaking for coherent continuum formation in normally dispersive nonlinear fibers, JOSA B 25, 1938 (2008)

    2008

  40. [48]

    J. M. Dudley and S. Coen, Coherence properties of su- percontinuum spectra generated in photonic crystal and tapered optical fibers, Opt. Lett. 27, 1180 (2002)

    2002

  41. [49]

    Rebolledo-Salgado, Z

    I. Rebolledo-Salgado, Z. Ye, S. Christensen, F. Lei, K. Twayana, J. Schr¨ oder, M. Zelan, and V. Torres- Company, Coherent supercontinuum generation in all- normal dispersion si3n4 waveguides, Opt. Express 30, 8641 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    T. J. Seok, K. Kwon, J. Henriksson, J. Luo, and M. C. Wu, Wafer-scale silicon photonic switches beyond die size limit, Optica 6, 490 (2019)

    2019

  43. [51]

    Zhang, K

    X. Zhang, K. Kwon, J. Henriksson, J. Luo, and M. C. Wu, A large-scale microelectromechanical-systems-based silicon photonics LiDAR, Nature 603, 253 (2022)

    2022

  44. [52]

    Zhang, M

    H. Zhang, M. Gu, X. Jiang, J. Thompson, H. Cai, S. Pae- sani, R. Santagati, A. Laing, Y. Zhang, M. Yung, et al., An optical neural chip for implementing complex-valued neural network, Nat. Commun. 12, 457 (2021)

    2021

  45. [53]

    Y. Gao, Y. Sun, I. Rebolledo-Salgado, R. Van Laer, V. Torres-company, and S. Jochen, Data accompanying ’tightly-confined and long z-cut lithium niobate waveg- uide with ultralow-loss’ (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.