Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 97 references

Quantifying the creation of negatively charged boron vacancies in He-ion irradiated hexagonal boron nitride

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Helium-ion irradiation of hBN creates negatively charged boron vacancies at a rate of at least 0.2% of all vacancies.

desk verdict A useful but underdocumented background-charge correction sits between the data and the 0.2% yield number; the paper deserves review, but the headline number should not be taken on faith. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.18481 v3 pith:WTZLLNOY submitted 2025-01-30 cond-mat.mes-hall

Amedeo Carbone , Ilia D. Breev , Johannes Figueiredo , Silvan Kretschmer , Leonard Geilen , Amine Ben Mhenni , Johannes Arceri , Arkady V. Krasheninnikov
show 5 more authors
Martijn Wubs Alexander W. Holleitner Alexander Huck Christoph Kastl Nicolas Stenger
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords hexagonalboronnitridevacancyhelium-ionirradiationopticallydetectedmagneticresonancechargemodeldefectcreationyieldquantumsensing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks how efficiently helium-ion irradiation converts ordinary lattice vacancies in hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) into negatively charged boron vacancies, the defect form that is useful for spin-based quantum sensing. The authors answer by combining optically detected magnetic resonance (ODMR) measurements of the defect's zero-field splitting with a microscopic charge model and atomistic simulations of ion damage. Their central result is a lower bound: about 0.2% of all boron vacancies produced by 30 keV helium ions end up in the optically active, negatively charged state, with the rest remaining optically inactive. If correct, this provides a protocol for measuring creation efficiency of these emitters, a step toward optimizing hBN as a host for photonic and sensing devices.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the microscopic charge model of the $V_B^-$ ground state, in which a random distribution of equal numbers of positive and negative point charges in a surrounding shell creates a net in-plane electric field that mixes the $|m_s=\pm1\rangle$ spin sublevels and opens a splitting proportional to the perpendicular susceptibility $d_\perp$ in the ODMR spectrum. The paper's modification is to add a constant background charge density $0.0285\ \mathrm{nm}^{-3}$ to the total charge density, so that the $V_B^-$ contribution is the measured density minus the background. Atomistic molecular dynamics simulations of 30 keV helium impacts supply the total boron-vacancy density against which the extracted $V_B^-$ density is normalized.

What would settle it

Measure the ODMR splitting of pristine, unirradiated hBN from the same source crystal: if it does not match the splitting corresponding to a $0.0285\ \mathrm{nm}^{-3}$ background charge, the constant-background subtraction fails, and the inferred $V_B^-$ yield would change; a complementary check is to count $V_B^-$ spins directly by electron paramagnetic resonance at the same fluences.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the density of negatively charged boron vacancies created by focused 30 keV helium-ion irradiation can be extracted from the density-dependent ODMR splitting, provided the microscopic charge model is augmented by a constant background charge density. From the measured splittings, the authors infer a background charge of $0.0285(33)\,\mathrm{nm}^{-3}$ and, after subtracting it, attribute the remaining charge to $V_B^-$ defects. Comparing that density with the total boron-vacancy density computed by molecular dynamics gives a creation yield of about 0.2% across the fluences studied, stated as a lower bound because the simulations do not include room-temperature annealing of vacancies. The quantitative claim is that at least this fraction of all vacancies created by irradiation is in the optically active, negatively charged state.

Load-bearing premise

The result rests on treating the background charge density, set at 0.0285 per cubic nanometer, as a constant that is inferred from the same ODMR data rather than measured independently; if that background is actually smaller, depends on fluence, or is itself produced by the irradiation, the 0.2% yield estimate could change by a large factor.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The inferred $V_B^-$ creation yield is roughly constant, near 0.2%, across fluences from $1.25\times10^{15}$ to $3.12\times10^{16}$ ions/cm$^2$.
  • At low fluences, an uncorrected charge model overestimates the $V_B^-$ density, so previous yield estimates that ignored the background charge are likely too high.
  • The same protocol can be applied to other hBN sources, irradiation species, and energies to benchmark defect creation efficiency.
  • Because the 0.2% number is a lower bound, the true yield could be higher once annealing and charge-transfer processes are taken into account.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension the paper leaves implicit: if the background charge is native to the crystal, pristine flakes from the same source should already show an ODMR splitting near the 0.0285 per cubic nanometer floor, and higher-quality crystals should yield systematically different inferred yields.
  • The same background-subtraction logic could transfer to other spin defects whose resonance shifts are read as local charge densities; without it, low-fluence creation yields will be overestimated in any host containing native charged impurities.
  • A direct microscopic check would be to image the local charge environment of pristine hBN with a scanning spin sensor; a near-zero pristine background would force the 0.2% yield estimate to be revisited.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a protocol for quantifying the creation efficiency of negatively charged boron vacancies (V_B^-) in hBN irradiated by focused 30 keV He ions. From ODMR spectra measured at four irradiation fluences, the authors extract a fluence-dependent splitting, convert it to an effective local charge density using a microscopic charge model, and then subtract a fitted 'constant background charge' of 0.0285(33) nm^-3 to obtain V_B^- densities of 0.0002-0.0059 nm^-3. Comparing these to MD-simulated boron vacancy densities leads to the central claim of a lower bound of 0.2% for the fraction of all vacancies that are in the optically active, negatively charged state, with the yield claimed to be approximately constant across fluence.

Significance. If the result holds, the paper would provide a useful, site-selective protocol for quantifying V_B^- generation efficiency in hBN, a quantity directly relevant to quantum sensing and photonic integration. The work combines systematic ODMR measurements over two orders of magnitude in fluence, a microscopic charge model, and MD simulations, and the data are made openly available. However, the central quantitative claim depends on a background subtraction that is not documented in the manuscript, and the tabulated numbers do not reproduce the headline 0.2% value. These issues are load-bearing rather than cosmetic.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section III.B, Table I, Appendix A.5] The background charge density rho_bg = 0.0285(33) nm^-3 is introduced in Section III.B and subtracted from each measured rho_c to obtain the V_B^- densities in Table I, but the manuscript never states how rho_bg was estimated from the data. The caption of Figure 3c hints that the background comes from the intercept of a linear fit of the splitting versus fluence, yet no fitting form, objective function, constraints, goodness-of-fit statistics, or residuals are reported anywhere, including in Appendix A.5 and Figure A.7. With only four ODMR-derived charge densities (0.0286-0.0343 nm^-3), a model with a slope and a free intercept can absorb much of the variation, and without a documented procedure the central 0.2% claim cannot be evaluated. Please report the full fitting procedure, including whether rho_bg was a free parameter, any constraints used, the resulting residuals, and a sensitivity analysis (e.g., fixing rho_bg to an independently measured native-defect level or allowing a linear fluence dependence).
  2. [Table I and Abstract] The last column of Table I does not follow from the preceding columns. For row 1, 0.0059 nm^-3 divided by 7.67 nm^-3 is 0.077%, not 0.2%; rows 2 and 3 similarly give about 0.08%, and row 4 gives about 0.065%. The abstract and conclusions repeat the 0.2% value. This is a load-bearing numerical inconsistency: either the denominator is not the tabulated MD boron vacancy density (for instance, it may be the nitrogen vacancy density at a different reference fluence), or the headline number is incorrect. The authors must correct the table or the text so that the claimed yield is reproducible from the tabulated values.
  3. [Section III.C and Table I] The MD simulation section states that the reference fluence is 0.8 x 10^16 ions/cm^2 and gives a boron vacancy density of 2.46 nm^-3. However, row 1 of Table I lists 7.67 nm^-3 for a fluence of 3.12 x 10^16 ions/cm^2, which equals 2.46 x 3.12, i.e., scaling relative to 1 x 10^16 ions/cm^2 rather than 0.8 x 10^16. This inconsistency directly affects the denominator of the yield calculation. Please specify the exact reference fluence and scaling rule used to generate the V_B(MD) column in Table I.
  4. [Table I and Section IV] The V_B^- densities in Table I carry relative errors of order 50-100% or larger (e.g., 0.0002 +/- 0.0065 nm^-3 for the lowest fluence), yet the final yield column is quoted without uncertainties and the lower-bound claim is stated as a single number. As a result, the yield for at least the low-fluence points is statistically indistinguishable from zero. Moreover, the 'lower bound' framing is fragile: because rho_bg is not independently measured, a larger background would drive the low-fluence V_B^- densities below zero, while a smaller background would raise the yields by factors of 5-10 or more. The paper should provide a proper error propagation for the yields and state explicitly which assumptions are being used to justify the lower-bound interpretation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section IV] The sentence 'we cannot make a conclusively statement' should read 'a conclusive statement'.
  2. [Figure 3 caption] The axis label 'Negative Charge Density (nm 3)' should be 'nm^{-3}' with the superscript properly rendered.
  3. [Table I] The column header 'V–B/V(MD) B' is difficult to parse; define the denominator explicitly in the caption or in the text.
  4. [Appendix A.5] The charge model depends on the shell radius (10 nm) and the minimum exclusion distance (two inter-atomic distances); a short sensitivity check for these parameters would help the reader judge how much of the extracted charge density is model-dependent.
  5. [Table III] The entry 'Zabelotsky, Appl. Nan. Mat. 2023' should cite the full journal name, 'ACS Applied Nano Materials', and reference formatting should be checked for consistency (e.g., Ref. 17 lists two article numbers).

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The 0.2% VB− creation yield is the residual of a background fit to the same four ODMR charge-density points, making the central quantitative claim statistically forced rather than independently predicted.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section III.B, 'Optically detected magnetic resonance and microscopic charge model', and Table I]
    "With these assumptions, we determine a background charge of 0.0285(33) nm−3. From that, we can find the corrected values for the V–B density as given in Table I."

    The background charge is not measured independently but is determined from the same four ODMR-derived charge densities from which it is later subtracted. Table I defines the V–B density as the residual ρc − 0.0285 nm−3 and the creation yield as that residual divided by the MD boron-vacancy density. With the assumed model ρc = ρ_bg + y·V_MD, determining ρ_bg from these data and then reporting y = (ρc − ρ_bg)/V_MD makes y the slope of a linear fit through the same points.

full rationale

Most of the analysis chain is externally anchored: the microscopic charge model follows Refs. 44, 54, and 55, the susceptibility d⊥ is taken from Ref. 44 without author overlap, and the MD vacancy densities are computed independently. The circularity is confined to the background correction that produces the paper's central number. The paper introduces a constant background charge, determines it from the same ODMR-derived charge densities, and then reports the residual as the VB− density and the residual divided by the MD vacancy density as the creation yield. Because the background is a fitted quantity extracted from the same four data points used to define the yield, the 0.2% lower bound is not an independent prediction but the slope of a two-parameter linear model applied to those points. The manuscript acknowledges the assumption but does not report the fitting statistic, the model form, or any independent measurement of the background, so the central quantitative claim reduces to the fitted residual. This warrants a partial circularity score of 6 rather than a higher score because the MD vacancy densities and the charge-model calibration are separate, non-circular inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

All quantities needed to convert the measured ODMR splitting into a VB- creation yield are listed above. The background charge is the most important fitted parameter; the shell radius and exclusion distance are modeling choices inherited from earlier work. The physical axioms are the charge-neutral random environment, the electric-field-only splitting mechanism, the PL-to-density proportionality, linear scaling with fluence, and MD vacancy counts as the denominator. The invented entity is the constant background charge, which has no independent evidence.

free parameters (3)
  • Background charge density rho_bg = 0.0285(33) nm^-3
    Fitted as the intercept (or base level) of the ODMR-derived charge density versus fluence, then subtracted to obtain VB- densities. Not independently measured.
  • Charge model shell radius = 10 nm
    Radius of the spherical shell around each VB- in which positive and negative charges are randomly placed. Chosen by hand from prior model practice; affects the splitting-to-density mapping.
  • Minimum charge exclusion distance = 2 times a = 0.2892 nm
    Charges closer than twice the inter-atomic distance a are excluded to avoid divergent fields and to neglect multi-vacancy complexes. This cutoff is a modeling choice.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Overall charge neutrality with equal numbers of positive and negative charges (N+ = N-) in each shell
    Assumed in the microscopic charge model (Appendix A.5) to preserve neutrality; the background charge is also assumed to come in equal positive and negative parts.
  • domain assumption The ODMR splitting is caused only by in-plane electric-field mixing with out-of-plane susceptibility d_parallel = 0 by mirror symmetry
    Section III.B and Appendix A.5, following Refs. [44,55]. Strain and temperature are assumed to shift only the mean D, not the splitting.
  • domain assumption Photoluminescence intensity is proportional to the number of optically active VB- defects for constant lifetime and below saturation
    Used in Section III.B to infer the factor 10 increase in VB- density from PL, which motivates the background charge. This is stated but not independently calibrated.
  • ad hoc to paper VB- density scales linearly with ion fluence
    The linear fit of charge density versus fluence, whose intercept yields the background, assumes a constant creation yield per ion. The paper does not present a separate test of this linearity.
  • domain assumption MD simulation vacancy counts represent the total boron vacancies produced, without annealing
    LAMMPS MD with BN-ExTeP/ZBL gives 2.46 B-vacancies per nm^3 at the reference fluence. The paper treats this as the denominator and calls the yield a lower bound because annealing is not simulated.
  • domain assumption The perpendicular electric-field susceptibility d_perp = 40 Hz/(V cm) from Ref. [44] is correct
    This parameter converts the simulated electric field into a level splitting and is a key external input to the charge model.
invented entities (1)
  • Constant background charge density
    purpose: Explains why the ODMR splitting is nearly fluence-independent while PL increases 10x; subtracted from total charge density to obtain VB- density
    No direct measurement of this background is provided; it is inferred from the same ODMR dataset. Its value changes the central yield number.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantifying the creation of negatively charged boron vacancies in He-ion irradiated hexagonal boron nitride." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WTZLLNOY

@misc{pith2026250118481,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantifying the creation of negatively charged boron vacancies in He-ion irradiated hexagonal boron nitride},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WTZLLNOY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.18481}
}
abstract

Hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) hosts luminescent defects possessing spin qualities compatible with quantum sensing protocols at room temperature. Vacancies, in particular, are readily obtained via exposure to high-energy ion beams. While the defect creation mechanism via such irradiation is well understood, the occurrence rate of optically active negatively charged vacancies ($V_B^-$) is an open question. In this work, we exploit focused helium ions to systematically generate optically active vacancy defects in hBN flakes at varying density. By comparing the density-dependent spin splitting measured by magnetic resonance to calculations based on a microscopic charge model, in which we introduce a correction term due to a constant background charge, we are able to quantify the number of $V_B^-$ defects generated by the ion irradiation. We find a lower bound for the fraction (0.2%) of all vacancies in the optically active, negatively charged state. Our results provide a protocol for measuring the generation efficiency of $V_B^-$, which is necessary for understanding and optimizing luminescent centers in hBN.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.18481 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. d depicts the simulation results for a selected range of average charge densities, in which we fit the experimentally measured values for different ion fluences (orange data points) to the calculated values of ν+ and ν− as a function of charge density (solid lines). In the fitting procedure, we match only the splitting ν+ −ν− rather than the absolute values of ν+ and ν−, such that we eliminate strain effects affecti… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    For graphite exfoliation, we pre- heat the substrates, which were beforehand treated in a mild oxygen plasma for 10 minutes

    Sample fabrication Thin layers of hBN (HQ Graphene) and graphite are ex- foliated using adhesive tape (Nitto blue tape for hBN and Scotch Magic Tape for graphite) on Si/SiO 2 substrates (ox- ide thickness 90 nm, cleaned by sonication in acetone and subsequently isopropanol). For graphite exfoliation, we pre- heat the substrates, which were beforehand trea...

  2. [2]

    PL measurements are performed on a custom confocal microscope featuring a 532-nm laser (Cobolt, Hübner GmbH)

    Optical Characterization Optical properties are characterized by diffraction-limited confocal scanning photoluminescence (PL) mapping, Raman microscopy, and time-resolved photoluminescence (TRPL) under ambient conditions. PL measurements are performed on a custom confocal microscope featuring a 532-nm laser (Cobolt, Hübner GmbH). The objective is a Nikon ...

  3. [3]

    As irradiation patterns, we choose arrays of circular patches with 400 nm diameter and 2 µm pitch

    Helium-ion irradiation To create luminescent defects in the hBN films, we use a fo- cused He-ion beam in a helium-ion microscope (Zeiss Orion). As irradiation patterns, we choose arrays of circular patches with 400 nm diameter and 2 µm pitch. The former is on the order of the typical spot size in the confocal microscope, such that He-irradiated spots appe...

  4. [4]

    This configuration allows the emitted light to pass through the loop

    Optically detected magnetic resonance (ODMR) We perform continuous-wave (CW) ODMR-measurements using a closed-loop coaxial antenna without electrical termi- nation, positioned between the objective and the sample. This configuration allows the emitted light to pass through the loop. The microwave field is generated with an SRS SG384 signal generator and a...

  5. [5]

    Microscopic charge model We model the V–B defect as a net negative charge situated at one lattice site surrounded by a number ofN− negative andN+ positive charges. The charges are localized on random sites of the hexagonal lattice and positive and negative charges are as- sumed to occur in equal numbers, N+ = N−, to preserve over- all charge neutrality wi...

  6. [6]

    Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations MD simulations are carried out using the LAMMPS pack- age [62] to extract the statistics of defect creation produced by the interaction of He ions with hBN. The interaction of the ion beam with the hBN structure is modeled via an ex- tended Tersoff potential for boron nitride (BN-ExTeP) [83], with a smooth transition to...

  7. [7]

    12 Reference Splitting hBN source Irradiation Fluence [MHz] (thickness [nm]) Method [× 10 15 cm−2] This work 145 − 165 HQgraphene (80) FIB He + (30 keV) 1 – 30 Gottscholl, Nat

    Comparison of ODMR splitting across different studies In Table III we compare our ODMR results with previously reported studies that explicitly observed V –B defects and pro- vided sufficient information about the hBN quality, the irradi- ation parameters and the ODMR results. 12 Reference Splitting hBN source Irradiation Fluence [MHz] (thickness [nm]) Me...

    2020

  8. [8]

    Shevitski, S

    B. Shevitski, S. M. Gilbert, C. T. Chen, C. Kastl, E. S. Barnard, E. Wong, D. F. Ogletree, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Zettl, et al., Blue-light-emitting color centers in high-quality hexago- nal boron nitride, Physical Review B 100, 155419 (2019)

    2019

Show all 97 references
  1. [9]

    Fournier, A

    C. Fournier, A. Plaud, S. Roux, A. Pierret, M. Rosticher, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. Buil, X. Quélin, J. Barjon, J.-P. Hermier, and A. Delteil, Position-controlled quantum emitters with reproducible emission wavelength in hexagonal boron ni- tride, Nature Communications 12,...

    2021

  2. [10]

    T. T. Tran, K. Bray, M. J. Ford, M. Toth, and I. Aharonovich, Quantum emission from hexagonal boron nitride monolayers, Nature Nanotechnology 11, 37 (2016)

    2016

  3. [11]

    Fischer, J

    M. Fischer, J. M. Caridad, A. Sajid, S. Ghaderzadeh, M. Ghorbani-Asl, L. Gammelgaard, P. Bøggild, K. S. Thyge- sen, A. V . Krasheninnikov, S. Xiao, M. Wubs, and N. Stenger, Controlled generation of luminescent centers in hexagonal boron nitride by irradiation engineering, Scie...

    2021

  4. [12]

    Aharonovich, D

    I. Aharonovich, D. Englund, and M. Toth, Solid-state single- photon emitters, Nature Photonics 10, 631 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    Gottscholl, M

    A. Gottscholl, M. Diez, V . Soltamov, C. Kasper, A. Sperlich, M. Kianinia, C. Bradac, I. Aharonovich, and V . Dyakonov, Room temperature coherent control of spin defects in hexag- onal boron nitride, Science Advances 7, eabf3630 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    A. R. Montblanch, M. Barbone, I. Aharonovich, M. Atatüre, and A. C. Ferrari, Layered materials as a platform for quantum technologies, Nature Nanotechnology 18, 555 (2023)

    2023

  7. [15]

    Gottscholl, M

    A. Gottscholl, M. Kianinia, V . Soltamov, S. Orlinskii, G. Mamin, C. Bradac, C. Kasper, K. Krambrock, A. Sperlich, M. Toth, I. Aharonovich, and V . Dyakonov, Initialization and read-out of intrinsic spin defects in a van der waals crystal at room temperature, Nature Materials ...

    2020

  8. [16]

    Kumar, C

    A. Kumar, C. Cholsuk, A. Zand, M. N. Mishuk, T. Matthes, F. Eilenberger, S. Suwanna, and T. V ogl, Localized creation of yellow single photon emitting carbon complexes in hexagonal boron nitride, APL Materials 11, 071108 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Hennessey, B

    M. Hennessey, B. Whitefield, A. Gale, M. Kianinia, J. A. Scott, I. Aharonovich, and M. Toth, Framework for Engineer- ing of Spin Defects in Hexagonal Boron Nitride by Focused Ion Beams, Advanced Quantum Technologies 2300459, 2300118 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    A. J. Healey, S. C. Scholten, T. Yang, J. A. Scott, G. J. Abra- hams, I. O. Robertson, X. F. Hou, Y . F. Guo, S. Rahman, Y . Lu, M. Kianinia, I. Aharonovich, and J. P. Tetienne, Quantum mi- croscopy with van der Waals heterostructures, Nature Physics 19, 87 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    A. Gale, C. Li, Y . Chen, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, I. Aharonovich, and M. Toth, Site-Specific Fabrication of Blue Quantum Emitters in Hexagonal Boron Nitride, ACS Photonics 9, 2170 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Horder, S

    J. Horder, S. J. White, A. Gale, C. Li, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Kianinia, I. Aharonovich, and M. Toth, Coher- ence Properties of Electron-Beam-Activated Emitters in Hexag- onal Boron Nitride Under Resonant Excitation, Physical Re- view Applied 18, 064021 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    Y . Chen, A. Gale, K. Yamamura, J. Horder, A. Condos, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Toth, and I. Aharonovich, An- nealing of blue quantum emitters in carbon-doped hexagonal boron nitride, Applied Physics Letters 123, 041902 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    Bourrellier, S

    R. Bourrellier, S. Meuret, A. Tararan, O. Stéphan, M. Kociak, L. H. Tizei, and A. Zobelli, Bright UV single photon emission at point defects in h-BN, Nano Letters 16, 4317 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    H. L. Stern, Q. Gu, J. Jarman, S. Eizagirre Barker, N. Mendel- son, D. Chugh, S. Schott, H. H. Tan, H. Sirringhaus, I. Aharonovich, and M. Atatüre, Room-temperature optically detected magnetic resonance of single defects in hexagonal boron nitride, Nature Communications 13, 618 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    H. L. Stern, C. M. Gilardoni, Q. Gu, S. Eizagirre Barker, O. F. J. Powell, X. Deng, S. A. Fraser, L. Follet, C. Li, A. J. Ramsay, H. H. Tan, I. Aharonovich, and M. Atatüre, A quantum coherent spin in hexagonal boron nitride at ambient conditions, Nature Materials 23, 1379 (2024). 13

    2024

  17. [25]

    X. Gao, S. Vaidya, S. Dikshit, P. Ju, K. Shen, Y . Jin, S. Zhang, and T. Li, Nanotube spin defects for omnidirectional magnetic field sensing, Nature Communications 15, 7697 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    A. J. Ramsay, R. Hekmati, C. J. Patrickson, S. Baber, D. R. M. Arvidsson-Shukur, A. J. Bennett, and I. J. Luxmoore, Coher- ence protection of spin qubits in hexagonal boron nitride, Na- ture Communications 14, 461 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    J. R. Toledo, D. B. de Jesus, M. Kianinia, A. S. Leal, C. Fantini, L. A. Cury, G. A. M. Sáfar, I. Aharonovich, and K. Krambrock, Electron paramagnetic resonance signature of point defects in neutron-irradiated hexagonal boron nitride, Physical Review B 98, 155203 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    X. Gao, B. Jiang, A. E. Llacsahuanga Allcca, K. Shen, M. A. Sadi, A. B. Solanki, P. Ju, Z. Xu, P. Upadhyaya, Y . P. Chen, S. A. Bhave, and T. Li, High-contrast plasmonic-enhanced shal- low spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride for quantum sens- ing, Nano Letters 21, 7708 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    Kianinia, S

    M. Kianinia, S. White, J. E. Fröch, C. Bradac, and I. Aharonovich, Generation of spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride, ACS Photonics 7, 2147 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    N. J. Guo, W. Liu, Z. P. Li, Y . Z. Yang, S. Yu, Y . Meng, Z. A. Wang, X. D. Zeng, F. F. Yan, Q. Li, J. F. Wang, J. S. Xu, Y . T. Wang, J. S. Tang, C. F. Li, and G. C. Guo, Generation of Spin Defects by Ion Implantation in Hexagonal Boron Nitride, ACS Omega 7, 1733 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    Glushkov, M

    E. Glushkov, M. Macha, E. Räth, V . Navikas, N. Ronceray, C. Y . Cheon, A. Ahmed, A. Avsar, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, I. Shorubalko, A. Kis, G. Fantner, and A. Radenovic, Engineer- ing optically active defects in hexagonal boron nitride using fo- cused ion beam and water, ACS...

    2022

  24. [32]

    F. Ren, Y . Wu, and Z. Xu, Creation and repair of luminescence defects in hexagonal boron nitride by irradiation and anneal- ing for optical neutron detection, Journal of Luminescence261, 119911 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    G. L. Liu, X. Y . Wu, P. T. Jing, Z. Cheng, D. Zhan, Y . Bao, J. X. Yan, H. Xu, L. G. Zhang, B. H. Li, K. W. Liu, L. Liu, and D. Z. Shen, Single Photon Emitters in Hexagonal Boron Nitride Fab- ricated by Focused Helium Ion Beam, Advanced Optical Mate- rials 2302083, 1 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Baber, R

    S. Baber, R. N. E. Malein, P. Khatri, P. S. Keatley, S. Guo, F. Withers, A. J. Ramsay, and I. J. Luxmoore, Excited state spectroscopy of boron vacancy defects in hexagonal boron nitride using time-resolved optically detected magnetic reso- nance, Nano Letters 22, 461 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    X. Gao, S. Vaidya, K. Li, P. Ju, B. Jiang, Z. Xu, A. E. L. All- cca, K. Shen, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. A. Bhave, Y . P. Chen, Y . Ping, and T. Li, Nuclear spin polarization and control in hexagonal boron nitride, Nature Materials 21, 1024 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Vaidya, X

    S. Vaidya, X. Gao, I. Dikshit, Saakshi Aharonovich, and L. Tongcang, Quantum sensing and imaging with spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride, Advances in Physics X 8, 2206049 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    Liang, Y

    H. Liang, Y . Chen, C. Yang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, G. Eda, and A. A. Bettiol, High Sensitivity Spin Defects in hBN Cre- ated by High-Energy He Beam Irradiation, Advanced Optical Materials 11, 2201941 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    Whitefield, M

    B. Whitefield, M. Toth, I. Aharonovich, J. P. Tetienne, and M. Kianinia, Magnetic Field Sensitivity Optimization of Neg- atively Charged Boron Vacancy Defects in hBN., Advanced Quantum Technologies 2300118, 1 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Clua-Provost, Z

    T. Clua-Provost, Z. Mu, A. Durand, C. Schrader, J. Happacher, J. Bocquel, P. Maletinsky, J. Fraunié, X. Marie, C. Robert, G. Seine, E. Janzen, J. H. Edgar, B. Gil, G. Cassabois, and V . Jacques, Spin-dependent photodynamics of boron-vacancy centers in hexagonal boron nitride, ...

    2024

  32. [40]

    Z. Mu, H. Cai, D. Chen, J. Kenny, Z. Jiang, S. Ru, X. Lyu, T. S. Koh, X. Liu, I. Aharonovich, and W. Gao, Excited-State Opti- cally Detected Magnetic Resonance of Spin Defects in Hexago- nal Boron Nitride, Physical Review Letters128, 216402 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    Mathur, A

    N. Mathur, A. Mukherjee, X. Gao, J. Luo, B. A. McCul- lian, T. Li, A. N. Vamivakas, and G. D. Fuchs, Excited-state spin-resonance spectroscopy of V–B defect centers in hexagonal boron nitride, Nature Communications 13, 3233 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    P. Yu, H. Sun, M. Wang, T. Zhang, X. Ye, J. Zhou, H. Liu, C. J. Wang, F. Shi, Y . Wang, and J. Du, Excited-State Spectroscopy of Spin Defects in Hexagonal Boron Nitride, Nano Letters 22, 3545 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    Mendelson, R

    N. Mendelson, R. Ritika, M. Kianinia, J. Scott, S. Kim, J. E. Fröch, C. Gazzana, M. Westerhausen, L. Xiao, S. S. Moha- jerani, S. Strauf, M. Toth, I. Aharonovich, and Z.-Q. Xu, Cou- pling spin defects in a layered material to nanoscale plasmonic cavities, Advanced Materials 34...

    2022

  36. [44]

    R. Gong, G. He, X. Gao, P. Ju, Z. Liu, B. Ye, E. A. Henrik- sen, T. Li, and C. Zu, Coherent dynamics of strongly interact- ing electronic spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride, Nature Communications 14, 3299 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    W. Liu, V . Ivády, Z.-P. Li, Y .-Z. Yang, S. Yu, Y . Meng, Z.-A. Wang, N.-J. Guo, F.-F. Yan, Q. Li, J.-F. Wang, J.-S. Xu, X. Liu, Z.-Q. Zhou, Y . Dong, X.-D. Chen, F.-W. Sun, Y .-T. Wang, J.-S. Tang, A. Gali, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Coherent dynamics of multi-spin V–B center ...

    2022

  38. [46]

    Huang, J

    M. Huang, J. Zhou, D. Chen, H. Lu, N. J. McLaughlin, S. Li, M. Alghamdi, D. Djugba, J. Shi, H. Wang, and C. R. Du, Wide field imaging of van der Waals ferromagnet Fe 3GeTe2 by spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride, Nature Communications13, 5369 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    Kumar, F

    P. Kumar, F. Fabre, A. Durand, T. Clua-Provost, J. Li, J. Edgar, N. Rougemaille, J. Coraux, X. Marie, P. Renucci, C. Robert, I. Robert-Philip, B. Gil, G. Cassabois, A. Finco, and V . Jacques, Magnetic Imaging with Spin Defects in Hexagonal Boron Ni- tride, Physical Review Appl...

    2022

  40. [48]

    J. R. Maze, P. L. Stanwix, J. S. Hodges, S. Hong, J. M. Tay- lor, P. Cappellaro, L. Jiang, M. V . Dutt, E. Togan, A. S. Zi- brov, A. Yacoby, R. L. Walsworth, and M. D. Lukin, Nanoscale magnetic sensing with an individual electronic spin in diamond, Nature 455, 644 (2008)

    2008

  41. [49]

    Balasubramanian, P

    G. Balasubramanian, P. Neumann, D. Twitchen, M. Markham, R. Kolesov, N. Mizuochi, J. Isoya, J. Achard, J. Beck, J. Tissler, V . Jacques, P. R. Hemmer, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup, Ultra- long spin coherence time in isotopically engineered diamond, Nature Materials 8, 383 (2009)

    2009

  42. [50]

    Sarkar, Y

    S. Sarkar, Y . Xu, S. Mathew, M. Lal, J.-Y . Chung, H. Y . Lee, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, T. Venkatesan, and S. Grade ˇcak, Identifying Luminescent Boron Vacancies in h-BN Generated Using Controlled He + Ion Irradiation, Nano Letters 24, 43 (2024)

    2024

  43. [51]

    Murzakhanov, B

    F. Murzakhanov, B. Yavkin, G. Mamin, S. Orlinskii, I. Mumdzhi, I. Gracheva, B. Gabbasov, A. Smirnov, V . Davy- dov, and V . Soltamov, Creation of Negatively Charged Boron Vacancies in Hexagonal Boron Nitride Crystal by Electron Ir- radiation and Mechanism of Inhomogeneous Broa...

    2021

  44. [52]

    Rizzato, M

    R. Rizzato, M. Schalk, S. Mohr, J. C. Hermann, J. P. Lei- bold, F. Bruckmaier, G. Salvitti, C. Qian, P. Ji, G. V . Astakhov, U. Kentsch, M. Helm, A. V . Stier, J. J. Finley, and D. B. Bucher, 14 Extending the coherence of spin defects in hBN enables ad- vanced qubit control an...

    2023

  45. [53]

    F. Ren, Z. Xu, and Y . Wu, Optimization of carbon irra- diation parameters for creating spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride, Nanotechnology and Precision Engineering 8, 10.1063/10.0036119 (2025)

    2025 doi

  46. [54]

    Durand, T

    A. Durand, T. Clua-Provost, F. Fabre, P. Kumar, J. Li, J. H. Edgar, P. Udvarhelyi, A. Gali, X. Marie, C. Robert, J. M. Gérard, B. Gil, G. Cassabois, and V . Jacques, Optically active spin defects in few-layer thick hexagonal boron nitride, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 116902 (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    Chemistry of Synthetic 2D Materials

    (see Figure A.7 for full data set and details of fitting pro- cedure). The error bars take into account both the experimen- tal uncertainty, i.e. the fitting error of the peak splitting (cf. Figure 3 c), and the theoretical uncertainty, i.e. the statistical spread of the eigen...

  48. [56]

    Grosso, H

    G. Grosso, H. Moon, B. Lienhard, S. Ali, D. K. Efetov, M. M. Furchi, P. Jarillo-Herrero, M. J. Ford, I. Aharonovich, and D. Englund, Tunable and high-purity room temperature single- photon emission from atomic defects in hexagonal boron ni- tride, Nature Communications 8, 705 (2017)

    2017

  49. [57]

    J. E. Fröch, L. P. Spencer, M. Kianinia, D. D. Totonjian, M. Nguyen, A. Gottscholl, V . Dyakonov, M. Toth, S. Kim, and I. Aharonovich, Coupling Spin Defects in Hexagonal Boron Ni- tride to Monolithic Bullseye Cavities, Nano Letters 21, 6549 (2021)

    2021

  50. [58]

    C. Qian, V . Villafañe, M. Schalk, G. V . Astakhov, U. Kentsch, M. Helm, P. Soubelet, N. P. Wilson, R. Rizzato, S. Mohr, A. W. Holleitner, D. B. Bucher, A. V . Stier, and J. J. Finley, Unveil- ing the zero-phonon line of the boron vacancy center by cavity- enhanced emission, N...

    2022

  51. [59]

    Sortino, A

    L. Sortino, A. Gale, L. Kühner, C. Li, J. Biechteler, F. J. Wendisch, M. Kianinia, H. Ren, M. Toth, S. A. Maier, I. Aharonovich, and A. Tittl, Optically addressable spin defects coupled to bound states in the continuum metasurfaces, Nature Communications 15, 2008 (2024)

    2024

  52. [60]

    Sasaki, Y

    K. Sasaki, Y . Nakamura, H. Gu, M. Tsukamoto, S. Nakaharai, T. Iwasaki, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. Ogawa, Y . Morita, and K. Kobayashi, Magnetic field imaging by hBN quantum sensor nanoarray, Applied Physics Letters 122 (2023)

    2023

  53. [61]

    The individ- ual flake thickness is assessed with atomic force microscopy (AFM)

    and cleaned by immersion in chloroform. The individ- ual flake thickness is assessed with atomic force microscopy (AFM). To create luminescent defects in hBN, we use a fo- cused He-ion beam (ion energy of 30 keV) to pattern an array of circular patches with 400 nm diameter and...

  54. [62]

    Zabelotsky, S

    T. Zabelotsky, S. Singh, G. Haim, R. Malkinson, S. Kadkho- dazadeh, I. P. Radko, I. Aharonovich, H. Steinberg, K. Berg- Sørensen, A. Huck, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, and N. Bar-Gill, Creation of Boron Vacancies in Hexagonal Boron Nitride Exfo- liated from Bulk Crystals for Qua...

    2023

  55. [63]

    Suzuki, Y

    T. Suzuki, Y . Yamazaki, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, Y . Nishiya, Y .-i. Matsushita, K. Harii, Y . Masuyama, Y . Hijikata, and T. Ohshima, Spin property improvement of boron vacancy de- fect in hexagonal boron nitride by thermal treatment, Applied Physics Express 16, 032006 (2023)

    2023

  56. [64]

    Udvarhelyi, T

    P. Udvarhelyi, T. Clua-Provost, A. Durand, J. Li, J. H. Edgar, B. Gil, G. Cassabois, V . Jacques, and A. Gali, A planar defect spin sensor in a two-dimensional material susceptible to strain and electric fields, npj Computational Materials 9, 150 (2023)

    2023

  57. [65]

    Haykal, R

    A. Haykal, R. Tanos, N. Minotto, A. Durand, F. Fabre, J. Li, J. H. Edgar, V . Ivády, A. Gali, T. Michel, A. Dréau, B. Gil, G. Cassabois, and V . Jacques, Decoherence of V–B spin defects in monoisotopic hexagonal boron nitride, Nature Communica- tions 13, 4347 (2022), 2112.10176

    2022 arXiv

  58. [66]

    X. Gao, S. Pandey, M. Kianinia, J. Ahn, P. Ju, I. Aharonovich, N. Shivaram, and T. Li, Femtosecond Laser Writing of Spin Defects in Hexagonal Boron Nitride, ACS Photonics 8, 994 (2021)

    2021

  59. [67]

    C. Jin, F. Lin, K. Suenaga, and S. Iijima, Fabrication of a free- standing boron nitride single layer and its defect assignments, Physical Review Letters 102, 195505 (2009)

    2009

  60. [68]

    Mitterreiter, B

    E. Mitterreiter, B. Schuler, B. Schuler, K. A. Cochrane, U. Wurstbauer, U. Wurstbauer, A. Weber-Bargioni, C. Kastl, and A. W. Holleitner, Atomistic Positioning of Defects in He- lium Ion Treated Single-Layer MoS2, Nano Letters 20, 4437 (2020)

    2020

  61. [69]

    Grzeszczyk, K

    M. Grzeszczyk, K. Vaklinova, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. S. Novoselov, and M. Koperski, Electroluminescence from pure resonant states in hBN-based vertical tunneling junctions, Light: Science and Applications 13, 155 (2024)

    2024

  62. [70]

    D. G. Purdie, N. M. Pugno, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, A. C. Ferrari, and A. Lombardo, Cleaning interfaces in layered mate- rials heterostructures, Nature Communications 9, 5387 (2018)

    2018

  63. [71]

    Plimpton, Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short-Range Molecu- lar Dynamics, Journal of Computational Physics 117, 1 (1995)

    S. Plimpton, Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short-Range Molecu- lar Dynamics, Journal of Computational Physics 117, 1 (1995)

    1995

  64. [72]

    Kretschmer, M

    S. Kretschmer, M. Maslov, S. Ghaderzadeh, M. Ghorbani- Asl, G. Hlawacek, and A. V . Krasheninnikov, Supported Two- Dimensional Materials under Ion Irradiation: The Substrate Governs Defect Production, ACS Applied Materials and Inter- faces 10, 30827 (2018)

    2018

  65. [73]

    Ghaderzadeh, S

    S. Ghaderzadeh, S. Kretschmer, M. Ghorbani-Asl, G. Hlawacek, and A. V . Krasheninnikov, Atomistic Simu- lations of Defect Production in Monolayer and Bulk Hexagonal Boron Nitride under Low- and High-Fluence Ion Irradiation, Nanomaterials 11, 1214 (2021)

    2021

  66. [74]

    Lehtinen, E

    O. Lehtinen, E. Dumur, J. Kotakoski, A. V . Krasheninnikov, K. Nordlund, and J. Keinonen, Production of defects in hexag- onal boron nitride monolayer under ion irradiation, Nuclear In- struments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and ...

    2011

  67. [75]

    Ivády, G

    V . Ivády, G. Barcza, G. Thiering, S. Li, H. Hamdi, J.-P. Chou, Ö. Legeza, and A. Gali, Ab initio theory of the negatively charged boron vacancy qubit in hexagonal boron nitride, npj Computational Materials 6, 41 (2020)

    2020

  68. [76]

    Libbi, P

    F. Libbi, P. M. M. De Melo, Z. Zanolli, M. J. Verstraete, and N. Marzari, Phonon-Assisted Luminescence in Defect Centers from Many-Body Perturbation Theory, Physical Review Letters 128, 167401 (2022)

    2022

  69. [77]

    J. R. Reimers, J. Shen, M. Kianinia, C. Bradac, I. Aharonovich, M. J. Ford, and P. Piecuch, Photoluminescence, photophysics, and photochemistry of the v B- defect in hexagonal boron ni- tride, Physical Review B 102, 144105 (2020)

    2020

  70. [78]

    J. Li, E. R. Glaser, C. Elias, G. Ye, D. Evans, L. Xue, S. Liu, G. Cassabois, B. Gil, P. Valvin, T. Pelini, A. L. Yeats, R. He, B. Liu, and J. H. Edgar, Defect Engineering of Monoisotopic Hexagonal Boron Nitride Crystals via Neutron Transmutation Doping, Chemistry of Materials...

    2021

  71. [79]

    W. Liu, Z. P. Li, Y . Z. Yang, S. Yu, Y . Meng, Z. A. Wang, Z. C. Li, N. J. Guo, F. F. Yan, Q. Li, J. F. Wang, J. S. Xu, Y . T. Wang, J. S. Tang, C. F. Li, and G. C. Guo, Temperature- Dependent Energy-Level Shifts of Spin Defects in Hexagonal Boron Nitride, ACS Photonics 8, 18...

    2021

  72. [80]

    Abdi, J.-P

    M. Abdi, J.-P. Chou, A. Gali, and M. B. Plenio, Color Centers in Hexagonal Boron Nitride Monolayers: A Group Theory and Ab Initio Analysis, ACS Photonics 5, 1967 (2018). 15

    2018

  73. [81]

    Linderälv, W

    C. Linderälv, W. Wieczorek, and P. Erhart, Vibrational signa- tures for the identification of single-photon emitters in hexago- nal boron nitride, Physical Review B 103, 115421 (2021)

    2021

  74. [82]

    Weston, D

    L. Weston, D. Wickramaratne, M. Mackoit, A. Alkauskas, and C. G. Van De Walle, Native point defects and impurities in hexagonal boron nitride, Physical Review B97, 214104 (2018)

    2018

  75. [83]

    Strand, L

    J. Strand, L. Larcher, and A. L. Shluger, Properties of intrinsic point defects and dimers in hexagonal boron nitride, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 32, 055706 (2020)

    2020

  76. [84]

    Schué, I

    L. Schué, I. Stenger, F. Fossard, A. Loiseau, and J. Barjon, Characterization methods dedicated to nanometer-thick hBN layers, 2D Materials 4, 015028 (2016), 1610.06858

    2016 arXiv

  77. [85]

    M. K. Prasad, O. A. Al-Ani, J. P. Goss, and J. D. Mar, Charge transfer due to defects in hexagonal boron nitride/graphene het- erostructures: An ab initio study, Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, 094003 (2023)

    2023

  78. [86]

    R. Giri, R. H. Jensen, D. Khurana, J. Bocquel, I. P. Radko, J. Lang, C. Osterkamp, F. Jelezko, K. Berg-Sørensen, U. L. Andersen, and A. Huck, Charge Stability and Charge-State- Based Spin Readout of Shallow Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers in Diamond, ACS Applied Electronic Materials ...

    2023

  79. [87]

    Fraunié, T

    J. Fraunié, T. Clua-Provost, S. Roux, Z. Mu, A. Delpoux, G. Seine, D. Lagarde, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, X. Marie, T. Poirier, J. H. Edgar, J. Grisolia, B. Lassagne, A. Claverie, V . Jacques, and C. Robert, Charge state tuning of spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride, arXiv...

    2025 arXiv

  80. [88]

    G. Park, I. Zhigulin, H. Jung, J. Horder, K. Yamamura, Y . Han, H. Cho, H.-W. Jeong, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Oh, G.-H. Lee, M.-H. Jo, I. Aharonovich, and J. Kim, Narrowband Elec- troluminescence from Color Centers in Hexagonal Boron Ni- tride, Nano Letters 24, 15268 (2024)

    2024

  81. [89]

    quantifying the creation of negatively charged boron vacancies in he-ion irradiated hexagonal boron nitride

    A. Carbone, I. D. Breev, J. Figueiredo, S. Kretschmer, L. Geilen, A. B. Mhenni, J. Arceri, A. V . Krasheninnikov, M. Wubs, A. W. Holleitner, A. Huck, C. Kastl, and N. Stenger, Data for: "quantifying the creation of negatively charged boron vacancies in he-ion irradiated hexago...

    2025

  82. [90]

    F. D. Steffen, R. K. Sigel, and R. Börner, An atomistic view on carbocyanine photophysics in the realm of RNA, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 18, 29045 (2016)

    2016

  83. [91]

    Hod, Graphite and Hexagonal Boron-Nitride have the Same Interlayer Distance

    O. Hod, Graphite and Hexagonal Boron-Nitride have the Same Interlayer Distance. Why?, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 8, 1360 (2012)

    2012

  84. [92]

    J. H. Los, J. M. Kroes, K. Albe, R. M. Gordillo, M. I. Katsnel- son, and A. Fasolino, Extended Tersoff potential for boron ni- tride: Energetics and elastic properties of pristine and defective h -BN, Physical Review B 96, 184108 (2017)

    2017

  85. [93]

    J. F. Ziegler, J. P. Biersack, and U. Littmark, The stopping and range of ions in solids (Pergamon, New York, 1985)

    1985

  86. [94]

    Möller and W

    W. Möller and W. Eckstein, Tridyn - A TRIM simulation code including dynamic composition changes, Nuclear Inst. and Methods in Physics Research, B 2, 814 (1984)

    1984

  87. [95]

    J. F. Ziegler, M. Ziegler, and J. Biersack, Srim – the stop- ping and range of ions in matter (2010), Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 268, 1818 (2010)

    2010

  88. [96]

    Taniguchi and K

    T. Taniguchi and K. Watanabe, Synthesis of high-purity boron nitride single crystals under high pressure by using Ba–BN sol- vent, Journal of Crystal Growth 303, 525 (2007)

    2007

  89. [97]

    Kubota, K

    Y . Kubota, K. Watanabe, O. Tsuda, and T. Taniguchi, Deep Ul- traviolet Light-Emitting Hexagonal Boron Nitride Synthesized at Atmospheric Pressure, Science 317, 932 (2007)

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.