Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 54 references

Transverse spin photocurrents in ultrathin topological insulator films

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Light on an ultrathin topological insulator film can generate pure transverse spin currents, and a gate voltage can set their direction.

desk verdict Careful surface-projected spin-current calculation with a genuinely new s/d-wave decomposition, but the abstract's gate-controlled net current is asserted, not derived. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.18547 v1 pith:KCQEP6DB submitted 2025-01-30 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.other

Shahrzad Movafagh , Predrag Nikolic This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.other
keywords topologicalinsulatorthinfilmsspinphotocurrentphotogalvaniceffectRashbaspin-orbitcouplingdetailedbalancetransversecurrents-waveandd-wavesymmetryspintronics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that light alone can generate pure transverse spin currents in an ultrathin topological insulator film, with no net charge current and no reliance on broken mirror symmetry. The authors model the film as two coupled Rashba-split bands representing its top and bottom surfaces, solve the radiation-driven steady state via detailed balance equations, and find that each surface carries a transverse spin current. When the symmetry between top and bottom surfaces is broken, for example by a substrate or a gate voltage, the surface currents no longer cancel and a net spin current appears. This net current has an s-wave part that is enhanced by light of any polarization and a d-wave part that exists only out of equilibrium, and a gate voltage can switch its direction. The result points to a simple spintronic device: a light-controlled, gate-tunable source of spin current.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the two-band model of an ultrathin TI film, in which electrons on the top ($\tau^z = +1$) and bottom ($\tau^z = -1$) surfaces are coupled by tunneling $\Delta$ and feel Rashba spin-orbit coupling encoded as the SU(2) gauge field $A = mv(\hat{z} \times \sigma)$. The calculation uses first-order Fermi golden-rule transition rates and detailed balance equations that decouple into independent quadruplets of states at each momentum $p$, producing the steady-state occupation excess $\delta n_{ps}$. The key identity is the surface projection operator $P_\pm = (1 \pm \tau^z)/2$, which isolates the individual surface spin currents whose residual difference survives when top-bottom symmetry is broken. The s-wave versus d-wave classification of the transverse spin current organizes the response: the s-wave component is invariant under quarter-turns and the d-wave component changes sign.

What would settle it

Grow a gateable ultrathin Bi2Se3 or Bi2Te3 film, illuminate it with elliptically polarized mid-infrared light, and detect transverse spin currents through spin-to-charge conversion in an adjacent ferromagnetic layer; the distinctive prediction is a spin current whose direction reverses when the gate voltage reverses the top-bottom occupation imbalance and which vanishes in a symmetric ungated film. Observing no such gate-controlled reversal in a clean low-temperature sample would falsify the central mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the radiation-induced steady state of the model Hamiltonian $H_0 = (p - \tau^z A)^2/2m + \Delta \tau^x - \mu$ supports nonzero spin currents when projected onto the top or bottom surfaces, even though the total charge and total spin currents vanish. The paper derives the driven occupation excess $\delta n_{p\sigma s} = \frac{A_p+B_p}{2A_p+2B_p+1} s (n^{(0)}_{p,-} - n^{(0)}_{p,+})$ from the detailed balance equations and then obtains the symmetrized transverse surface spin currents $eJ^s = \frac{4v}{m\hbar^2} \int \frac{d^2 p}{(2\pi)^2} \, \delta n_p \, \frac{p^2}{\epsilon_p}$ and $eJ^d = \frac{4v}{m\hbar^2} \int \frac{d^2 p}{(2\pi)^2} \, \delta n_p \, \frac{p_y^2 - p_x^2}{\epsilon_p}$, where $\epsilon_p = \sqrt{(vp)^2 + \Delta^2}$. The s-wave component is invariant under $\pi/2$ rotations, while the d-wave component changes sign, and both are invariant under in-plane mirror reflections. Adding the top-bottom asymmetry term $\delta H = \delta\mu\, \tau^z$, which models a substrate or gate voltage, prevents the cancellation of the surface-projected currents and leaves a net transverse spin current whose sign is set by whichever surface is more populated. The paper interprets the response as a quadratic spin-current photogalvanic effect that saturates at high intensity and, within the noninteracting model, shrinks as the light bandwidth narrows.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative predictions rest on the assumption that an ultrathin film is accurately described by two coupled parabolic electron bands with a fixed spin-orbit coupling and a fixed tunneling gap, ignoring disorder, hexagonal warping, higher sub-bands, and interactions; if real films depart from this model, the existence or magnitude of the predicted spin photocurrents could change substantially.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Ultrathin TI films become light-driven sources of pure spin current with no accompanying charge current, which is a useful ingredient for low-dissipation spintronics.
  • Because the net spin current's sign is set by the top-bottom surface occupation imbalance, a gate voltage can act as the control electrode of a spin-current photo-transistor or amplifier.
  • The s-wave spin current is enhanced by light of any polarization and exists as a background already in the ground state, while the d-wave component is excited only out of equilibrium and vanishes for circular polarization at normal incidence.
  • In the weak-field regime the currents are linear in light intensity; in strong fields they saturate, and for perfectly coherent light within the noninteracting model they shrink as $\delta/\omega$, so a finite bandwidth or interactions are needed for a robust macroscopic response.
  • The effect requires no broken in-plane mirror symmetry and no handedness-dependent sign change, so it should appear for practically any polarization and incidence angle once the top-bottom symmetry is disturbed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A consequence the authors leave implicit is that the same mechanism should operate in any two-dimensional Rashba-coupled bilayer insulator, not only films descended from topological insulators; this could be tested in gated semiconductor quantum wells.
  • Since the d-wave spin current is a direct measure of light-induced anisotropy in the momentum distribution, its angular and polarization dependence could serve as an optical probe of hot-electron distributions.
  • The authors note that interactions may restore a macroscopic response to perfectly coherent light; if strongly correlated or fractionalized phases exist in such films, the spin photocurrent could reveal signatures that charge transport misses.
  • A practical route to detection would be to convert the transverse spin current into a charge voltage with a ferromagnetic or heavy-metal layer via the inverse spin Hall effect, making the gate-controlled sign reversal the key experimental observable.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies light-induced charge and spin currents in an ultrathin topological insulator film described by two coupled parabolic bands with Rashba spin-orbit coupling and a tunneling gap. Using first-order time-dependent perturbation theory and detailed balance equations, the authors derive the radiation-driven occupation changes and compute charge and spin currents. In the perfectly symmetric model the total charge and spin currents vanish, but surface-projected spin currents have nonzero transverse s-wave and d-wave components. The paper claims that disturbing the top-bottom symmetry produces net gate-controllable transverse spin currents with potential applications in spin-current phototransistors.

Significance. If the central claim were actually derived, the predicted pure transverse spin photocurrents with s-wave and d-wave symmetry would be a useful and interesting addition to the photogalvanic literature. The analytic treatment of the symmetric model is careful and explicit: the optical matrix elements are evaluated in detail, the detailed-balance equations decouple into solvable momentum-space quadruplets, and the results are given in closed form in Eqs. (34), (37), and (43). The paper also clearly identifies its model idealizations. However, the headline claim about symmetry breaking is not derived anywhere; the manuscript computes only surface projections in the symmetric model and then asserts, in Section IV, that a top-bottom asymmetry leaves a nonzero net residue. That is a load-bearing gap, because the existence, sign, and magnitude of a net spin current for an asymmetric film are not established by the presented calculation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV; see also Section III C, Eqs. (37), (40)-(43)] The abstract and the introduction claim that helical transverse spin currents are generated when the symmetry between the top and bottom surfaces is disturbed, but no calculation with broken top-bottom symmetry is presented. The Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) has no δμ τ_z term, the detailed-balance solution in Eq. (34) is derived for the symmetric model, and the currents in Eqs. (37) and (41)-(43) are evaluated using symmetric-model eigenstates and occupations. The projected currents eJ^a_± are not the currents of a system with δμ ≠ 0; breaking the symmetry changes the eigenstates, the optical matrix elements, and the steady-state occupations. None of these effects is computed. Consequently, the sign, magnitude, and even existence of a net transverse spin current for δμ ≠ 0 are not established. This is a central gap because the paper's main physical prediction is precisely the asymmetry-generated net spin current.
  2. [Section III C, text after Eq. (43)] The statement that the s-wave projected current eJ_s 'exists as a background even in the ground state' is not supported by the formula displayed. The occupation excess δn_p in Eq. (34) is proportional to A_p + B_p, which vanishes at zero light intensity; therefore the current in Eq. (43) is a light-induced quantity, not a ground-state background. If a ground-state contribution is intended, it must be obtained by inserting the equilibrium occupation n^{(0)} into the current expectation value, and this is not shown. As written, the background claim is inconsistent with the derivation.
  3. [Section III B, Eqs. (30) and (34)] The transition rates A_p and B_p in Eq. (30) contain a Gaussian spectral factor J(2ε_p/ℏ), but the derivation of Eq. (34) from Eq. (25) treats these rates as momentum-independent coefficients after removing the momentum δ-function. It would strengthen the paper to show explicitly how the momentum integrals and the replacement in Eq. (28) lead to the dimensionless parameter α defined in Eq. (44), and to verify that the weak- and strong-intensity regimes in Eq. (45) follow from Eq. (34) with the stated definitions. This is a checkable consistency issue that affects the claimed intensity dependence of the currents.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section III C, text after Eq. (43)] The phrase 'The d-wave spin current eJc exists only in the non-equilibrium state' appears to contain a typo: the symbol should be eJ_d, not eJ_c.
  2. [Appendix A, Eq. (A8)] The text states e1 · e2 = 1, but the explicit forms of e1 and e2 are orthogonal; the dot product should be 0. Please correct this typo.
  3. [Section IV] The phrase 'the in-lane electric field' should read 'the in-plane electric field'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the s/d-wave photocurrents are derived from the stated Hamiltonian by perturbation theory and detailed balance, not assumed as inputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained: the model H0 in Eq. (1) defines the band structure and current operators; Section III A derives the optical transition rates (21) by first-order time-dependent perturbation theory with explicit matrix elements in Appendix A; Section III B solves the resulting detailed-balance equations analytically to obtain the occupation shift δnps in Eq. (34); and Section III C inserts that shift into the current operators to produce Eqs. (37), (41), and the symmetrized s-wave and d-wave currents in Eq. (43). No quantity used in the final currents is fitted to those currents, and no load-bearing step is imported from a self-citation: refs. [44-48] appear only in the Introduction as speculative extensions and play no role in the calculation. Two internal concerns should be noted but are not circularity: the abstract and Section IV claim that top/bottom asymmetry (δH=δμτ_z) yields a net gate-controllable spin current, yet no calculation with δH≠0 is shown, so that claim is underived; and the statement after Eq. (43) that eJs exists as a ground-state background is not supported by the displayed formula, whose δnp is light-induced. Under the hard rule that circularity requires an exhibited reduction of an equation or result to its own inputs, these are correctness or completeness gaps, not circular steps.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation relies on a minimal two-band model with standard analytical methods; no numerical fits to the target result are used. The model parameters (m, v, Δ, τ, δ) are physical inputs, not free parameters fitted to data. The principal assumptions are listed as axioms.

free parameters (2)
  • recombination time τ
    A single relaxation time introduced in the detailed balance equation (23) to model recombination; its value is not derived from the Hamiltonian.
  • light frequency bandwidth δ
    The Gaussian width used in Eq. (28) to regularize energy conservation; controls the coherent limit and is not a predicted quantity.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The ultrathin TI film is described by the effective two-band Hamiltonian H0=(p-τz A)^2/(2m)+Δ τx-μ (Eq. 1) with parabolic bands and constant Rashba coupling v.
    Introduced in Section II; ignores hexagonal warping, finite thickness sub-bands, and disorder.
  • domain assumption Optical transitions are treated to first order with Fermi's golden rule, and the photon's in-plane momentum is neglected so transitions are vertical in momentum space.
    Section III A; valid for long wavelengths but not explicitly justified for the plotted parameter ranges.
  • domain assumption The steady state is governed by the detailed-balance equation (23) with a single recombination time τ and Fermi-Dirac equilibrium occupations.
    Section III B; this neglects energy-dependent relaxation and many-body effects.
  • domain assumption The light spectrum is a Gaussian of width δ (Eq. 28), replacing the energy-conserving delta function.
    Chosen to avoid momentum-integral divergences and to model a finite coherence time.
  • standard math First-order time-dependent perturbation theory with Fermi's golden rule is valid for the light intensities considered.
    Section III A; requires weak driving, stated explicitly.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Transverse spin photocurrents in ultrathin topological insulator films." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KCQEP6DB

@misc{pith2026250118547,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Transverse spin photocurrents in ultrathin topological insulator films},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KCQEP6DB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.18547}
}
abstract

Nonlinear helicity-dependent photocurrents have been reported in 3D topological materials lacking inversion symmetry. Here, we theoretically study the charge and spin photocurrents generated by linear and circularly polarized radiation in ultrathin topological insulator films. Using time-dependent perturbation theory and detailed balance equations, we find that helical transverse spin currents are generated when the symmetry between the top and bottom film surfaces is disturbed. Such spin currents are invariant under in-plane mirror transformations but have $s$-wave and $d$-wave components in regard to transformations under $\pi/2$ rotations. Spin current photo-transistors and amplifiers can be based on these effects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.18547 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The geometry of the TI film and incident light with wavevec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The light-induced surface-projected [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. The temperature dependence of the light-induced surface [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The light-induced surface-projected [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Murakami, N

    S. Murakami, N. Nagaosa, and S.-C. Zhang, Spin-hall insulator, Physical Review Letters 93, 156804 (2004)

    work page 2004

  2. [2]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Quantum spin hall effect in graphene, Physical Review Letters 95, 226801 (2005)

    work page 2005

  3. [3]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Z 2 topological order and the quantum spin hall effect, Physical Review Letters 95, 146802 (2005)

    work page 2005

  4. [4]

    B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum spin hall effect and topological phase transition in hgte quantum wells, Science 314, 1757 (2006)

    2006

  5. [5]

    Qi, Y .-S

    X.-L. Qi, Y .-S. Wu, and S.-C. Zhang, Topological quantization of the spin hall effect in two-dimensional paramagnetic semi- conductors, Physical Review B 74, 085308 (2006)

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    K ¨onig, S

    M. K ¨onig, S. Wiedmann, C. Br ¨une, A. Roth, H. Buhmann, L. W. Molenkamp, X.-L. Qi, and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum spin hall insulator state in hete quantum wells, Science 318, 766 (2007)

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    Roy, Topological phases and the quantum spin hall effect in three dimensions, Physical Review B 79, 195322 (2009)

    R. Roy, Topological phases and the quantum spin hall effect in three dimensions, Physical Review B 79, 195322 (2009)

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    Yan and S.-C

    B. Yan and S.-C. Zhang, Topological materials, Reports on Progress in Physics 75, 096501 (2012)

    work page 2012

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    M. Z. Hasan and J. E. Moore, Three-dimensional topological insulators, Annual Reviews of Condensed Matter Physics 2, 55 (2011)

    2011

  2. [10]

    L. Fu, C. L. Kane, and E. J. Mele, Topological insulators in three dimensions, Physical Review Letters 98, 106803 (2007)

    2007

  3. [11]

    J. E. Moore and L. Balents, Topological invariants of time- reversal-invariant band structures, Physical Review B 75, 121306(R) (2007)

    2007

  4. [12]

    Zhang, K

    Y . Zhang, K. He, C.-Z. Chang, C.-L. Song, L.-L. Wang, X. Chen, J.-F. Jia, Z. Fang, X. Dai, W.-Y . Shan, S.-Q. Shen, Q. Niu, X.-L. Qi, S.-C. Zhang, X.-C. Ma, and Q.-K. Xue, Crossover of the three-dimensional topological insulator bi2se3 to the two-dimensional limit, Nature Phy...

    2010

  5. [13]

    Bansil, H

    A. Bansil, H. Lin, and T. Das, Colloquium: Topological band theory, Reviews of Modern Physics 88, 021004 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    K. L. Wang, M. Lang, and X. Kou, Handbook of Spintronics , edited by Y . Xu, D. D. Awschalom, and J. Nitta (Springer, 2016) Chap. Spintronics of Topological Insulators, pp. 431–462

    2016

  7. [15]

    Y . Hou, T. Zhang, J. Sun, L. Liu, Y . Yao, and Y . Wang, Progress on 2d topological insulators and potential applications in elec- tronic devices, Chinese Physics B 29, 097304 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    Weber, M

    B. Weber, M. S. Fuhrer, X.-L. Sheng, S. A. Yang, R. Thomale, S. Shamim, L. W. Molenkamp, D. Cobden, D. Pesin, H. J. W. Zandvliet, P. Bampoulis, R. Claessen, F. R. Menges, J. Gooth, C. Felser, C. Shekhar, A. Tadich, M. Zhao, M. T. Edmonds, J. Jia, M. Bieniek, J. I. V ¨ayrynen, ...

    2024

  9. [17]

    Junck, G

    A. Junck, G. Refael, and F. von Oppen, Photocurrent response of topological insulator surface states, Physical Review B— Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 88, 075144 (2013)

    2013

  10. [18]

    Plank, J

    H. Plank, J. Pernul, S. Gebert, S. N. Danilov, J. K ¨onig-Otto, S. Winnerl, M. Lanius, J. Kampmeier, G. Mussler, I. Aguil- era, D. Gr ¨utzmacher, and S. D. Ganichev, Infrared/terahertz spectra of the photogalvanic effect in (bi, sb) te based three- dimensional topological insu...

    2018

  11. [19]

    Takeno, S

    H. Takeno, S. Saito, and K. Mizoguchi, Optical control of spin- polarized photocurrent in topological insulator thin films, Sci- entific Reports 8, 15392 (2018)

    2018

  12. [20]

    Kastl, C

    C. Kastl, C. Karnetzky, H. Karl, and A. W. Holleitner, Ultra- fast helicity control of surface currents in topological insula- tors with near-unity fidelity, Nature Communications 6, 6617 10 (2015)

    2015

  13. [21]

    J. Duan, N. Tang, X. He, Y . Yan, S. Zhang, X. Qin, X. Wang, X. Yang, F. Xu, Y . Chen, W. Ge, and B. Shen, Identification of helicity-dependent photocurrents from topological surface states in bi2se3 gated by ionic liquid, Scientific Reports 4, 4889 (2014)

    2014

  14. [22]

    Braun, G

    L. Braun, G. Mussler, A. Hruban, M. Konczykowski, T. Schu- mann, M. Wolf, M. M¨unzenberg, L. Perfetti, and T. Kampfrath, Ultrafast photocurrents at the surface of the three-dimensional topological insulator bi2se3, Nature Communications 7, 13259 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    J. Yu, L. Xia, K. Zhu, Q. Pan, X. Zeng, Y . Chen, Y . Liu, C. Yin, S. Cheng, Y . Lai, K. He, and Q. Xue, Control of circular pho- togalvanic effect of surface states in the topological insulator bi2te3 via spin injection, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 12, 18091 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    Dai and A

    Z. Dai and A. M. Rappe, Recent progress in the theory of bulk photovoltaic effect, Chemical Physics Reviews 4, 011303 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    Ganichev, H

    S. Ganichev, H. Ketterl, W. Prettl, E. Ivchenko, and L. V orob- jev, Circular photogalvanic effect induced by monopolar spin orientation in p-gaas/algaas multiple-quantum wells, Applied Physics Letters 77, 3146 (2000)

    2000

  18. [26]

    Hosur, Circular photogalvanic effect on topological insula- tor surfaces: Berry-curvature-dependent response, Physical Re- view B 83, 035309 (2011)

    P. Hosur, Circular photogalvanic effect on topological insula- tor surfaces: Berry-curvature-dependent response, Physical Re- view B 83, 035309 (2011)

    2011

  19. [27]

    E. Deyo, L. E. Golub, E. L. Ivchenko, and B. Spivak, Semiclas- sical theory of the photogalvanic effect in non-centrosymmetric systems, (2009), arXiv:0904.1917 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2009 arXiv

  20. [28]

    J. E. Moore and J. Orenstein, Confinement-induced berry phase and helicity-dependent photocurrents, Physical Review Letters 105, 026805 (2010)

    2010

  21. [29]

    Morimoto and N

    T. Morimoto and N. Nagaosa, Topological nature of nonlinear optical effects in solids, Science Advances2, e1501524 (2016)

    2016

  22. [30]

    H. Xu, H. Wang, J. Zhou, and J. Li, Pure spin photocurrent in non-centrosymmetric crystals: bulk spin photovoltaic effect, Nature Communications 12, 4330 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    W. Wu, J. Yu, Y .-H. Chen, Y . Liu, S. Cheng, Y . Lai, J. Sun, H. Zhou, and K. He, Electric control of helicity-dependent pho- tocurrent and surface polarity detection on two-dimensional bi2o2se nanosheets, ACS Nano 17, 16633 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    R. Rong, Y . Liu, X. Nie, W. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Y . Liu, and W. Guo, The interaction of 2d materials with circularly polar- ized light, Advanced Science 10, 2206191 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    J. Li, C. He, L. Meng, H. Xiao, C. Tang, X. Wei, J. Kim, N. Kioussis, G. Malcolm Stocks, and J. Zhong, Two- dimensional topological insulators with tunable band gaps: Single-layer hgte and hgse, Scientific Reports 5, 14115 (2015)

    2015

  26. [34]

    Zhang, W.-X

    S.-J. Zhang, W.-X. Ji, C.-W. Zhang, P. Li, and P.-J. Wang, Two-dimensional large gap topological insulators with tunable rashba spin-orbit coupling in group-iv films, Scientific Reports 7, 45923 (2017)

    2017

  27. [35]

    R. Fei, X. Lu, and L. Yang, Intrinsic spin photogalvanic effect in nonmagnetic insulator, (2020), arXiv:2006.10690 [cond- mat.mtrl-sci]

    2020 arXiv

  28. [36]

    T. Song, E. Anderson, M. W.-Y . Tu, K. Seyler, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. A. McGuire, X. Li, T. Cao, D. Xiao, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Spin photovoltaic effect in magnetic van der waals heterostructures, Science Advances 7, 10.1126/sciadv.abg8094 (2021)

    2021 doi

  29. [37]

    Jiang, X

    P. Jiang, X. Tao, H. Hao, Y . Liu, X. Zheng, and Z. Zeng, Two- dimensional centrosymmetrical antiferromagnets for spin pho- togalvanic devices, npj Quantum Information 7, 21 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    S. Fang, M. Wang, X. Yang, Z. Yang, Q. Li, Z. Luo, and J. Lu, Tunable spin photogalvanic effect in two-dimensional van der waals ferroelectric semiconductors with spin-orbit cou- pling, Physical Review B 109, 195202 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    J. W. McIver, D. Hsieh, H. Steinberg, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and N. Gedik, Control over topological insulator photocurrents with light polarization, Nature Nanotechnology 7, 96 (2012)

    2012

  32. [40]

    Olbrich, L

    P. Olbrich, L. E. Golub, T. Herrmann, S. N. Danilov, H. Plank, V . V . Bel’kov, G. Mussler, C. Weyrich, C. M. Schneider, J. Kampmeier, D. Gr¨utzmacher, L. Plucinski, M. Eschbach, and S. D. Ganichev, Room-temperature high-frequency transport of dirac fermions in epitaxially gro...

    2014

  33. [41]

    Dantscher, D

    K.-M. Dantscher, D. A. Kozlov, P. Olbrich, C. Zoth, P. Fal- termeier, M. Lindner, G. V . Budkin, S. A. Tarasenko, V . V . Bel’kov, Z. D. Kvon, N. N. Mikhailov, S. A. Dvoretsky, D. Weiss, B. Jenichen, and S. D. Ganichev, Cyclotron- resonance-assisted photocurrents in surface st...

    2015

  34. [42]

    K. N. Okada, N. Ogawa, R. Yoshimi, A. Tsukazaki, K. S. Taka- hashi, M. Kawasaki, and Y . Tokura, Enhanced photogalvanic current in topological insulators via fermi energy tuning, Phys- ical Review B 93, 081403 (2016)

    2016

  35. [43]

    Plank, L

    H. Plank, L. E. Golub, S. Bauer, V . V . Bel’kov, T. Her- rmann, P. Olbrich, M. Eschbach, L. Plucinski, C. M. Schnei- der, J. Kampmeier, M. Lanius, G. Mussler, D. Gr ¨utzmacher, and S. D. Ganichev, Photon drag effect in (bi1−xsbx)2te3 three-dimensional topological insulators, ...

    2016

  36. [44]

    Nikoli ´c, T

    P. Nikoli ´c, T. Duri ´c, and Z. Tesanovi ´c, Fractional topological insulators of cooper pairs induced by proximity effect, Physical Review Letters 110, 176804 (2013)

    2013

  37. [45]

    Nikoli ´c and Z

    P. Nikoli ´c and Z. Tesanovi´c, Pairing instabilities in topological insulator quantum wells, Physical Review B87, 104514 (2013)

    2013

  38. [46]

    Nikoli ´c, Effective theory of fractional topological insula- tors in two spatial dimensions, Physical Review B 87, 245120 (2013)

    P. Nikoli ´c, Effective theory of fractional topological insula- tors in two spatial dimensions, Physical Review B 87, 245120 (2013)

    2013

  39. [47]

    Nikoli ´c and Z

    P. Nikoli ´c and Z. Tesanovi´c, Interaction proximity effect at the interface between a superconductor and a topological insulator quantum well, Physical Review B 87, 134511 (2013)

    2013

  40. [48]

    Nikoli ´c, V ortex states in a non-abelian magnetic field, Physi- cal Review B 94, 064523 (2016)

    P. Nikoli ´c, V ortex states in a non-abelian magnetic field, Physi- cal Review B 94, 064523 (2016)

    2016

  41. [49]

    E. L. Ivchenko and S. D. Ganichev, Spin-dependent photo- galvanic effects (a review), (2017), arXiv:1710.09223 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

    2017 arXiv

  42. [50]

    S. D. Ganichev and W. Prettl, Spin photocurrents in quantum wells, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 15, R935 (2003)

    2003

  43. [51]

    Q. S. Wu, S. N. Zhang, Z. Fang, and X. Dai, Photogalvanic in ultrathin film of topological insulator, Physica E: Low- dimensional Systems and Nanostructures 44, 895 (2012)

    2012

  44. [52]

    H., Nakatsuji Satoru, and Otani Yoshichika, Magnetic and magnetic inverse spin hall effects in a non-collinear antiferromagnet, Nature 565, 627 (2019)

    Kimata Motoi, Chen Hua, Kondou Kouta, Sugimoto Satoshi, Muduli Prasanta K., Ikhlas Muhammad, Omori Yasutomo, Tomita Takahiro, MacDonald Allan. H., Nakatsuji Satoru, and Otani Yoshichika, Magnetic and magnetic inverse spin hall effects in a non-collinear antiferromagnet, Nature...

    2019

  45. [53]

    X. Lou, C. Adelmann, S. A. Crooker, E. S. Garlid, J. Zhang, K. M. Reddy, S. D. Flexner, C. J. Palmstrøm, and P. A. Crow- ell, Electrical detection of spin transport in lateral ferromagnet– semiconductor devices, Nature Physics 3, 197 (2007)

    2007

  46. [54]

    Dankert, J

    A. Dankert, J. Geurs, M. V . Kamalakar, S. Charpentier, and S. P. Dash, Room temperature electrical detection of spin polar- ized currents in topological insulators, Nano Letters 15, 7976 (2015)

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.