Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

SoK: Towards Effective Automated Vulnerability Repair

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.18820 v1 pith:7UZEAJSU submitted 2025-01-31 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords methodsvulnerabilitiesapproachesautomatedchallengescomprehensivediverseexisting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The increasing prevalence of software vulnerabilities necessitates automated vulnerability repair (AVR) techniques. This Systematization of Knowledge (SoK) provides a comprehensive overview of the AVR landscape, encompassing both synthetic and real-world vulnerabilities. Through a systematic literature review and quantitative benchmarking across diverse datasets, methods, and strategies, we establish a taxonomy of existing AVR methodologies, categorizing them into template-guided, search-based, constraint-based, and learning-driven approaches. We evaluate the strengths and limitations of these approaches, highlighting common challenges and practical implications. Our comprehensive analysis of existing AVR methods reveals a diverse landscape with no single ``best'' approach. Learning-based methods excel in specific scenarios but lack complete program understanding, and both learning and non-learning methods face challenges with complex vulnerabilities. Additionally, we identify emerging trends and propose future research directions to advance the field of AVR. This SoK serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners, offering a structured understanding of the current state-of-the-art and guiding future research and development in this critical domain.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SoK: Automated Vulnerability Repair: Methods, Tools, and Assessments

    cs.SE 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Vul4C, a 144-vulnerability C/C++ repair benchmark with exploits and patches, is introduced and used to compare seven C/C++ and two Java automated vulnerability repair tools.

Pith tools