Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 146 references

Quantum Internet Use Case Analysis for the Automotive Industry

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A qualitative megatrend analysis identifies hardware miniaturization and automation as near-term quantum-internet automotive synergies and proposes long-term use cases in secure VANETs, autonomous driving, and sensor fusion.

desk verdict A well-organized expert-opinion roadmap for quantum internet in automotive; the qualitative relevance scores are the load-bearing but unvalidated core. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.19070 v1 pith:3BUARUFP submitted 2025-01-31 quant-ph

K.L. van der Enden , R. Kirschner , M. Krumtünger , A. Wilms This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords quantuminternetautomotivecasesdomainsfuturesectorcomputing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies how a future quantum internet might be used by the car industry. A quantum internet is a network that connects quantum computers using quantum bits and entanglement, which lets information be sent in a way that cannot be copied or intercepted without detection. The authors collect trends in quantum internet research and in automotive technology, then compare them by hand. For the next ten years they say the strongest overlap is in making quantum hardware smaller and more automated, because cars have limited space and need reliable, mass produced components. For the longer term they propose use cases such as secure vehicle to vehicle communication, private decision making, sensor fusion, and authentication of charging station transactions.

The paper does not run experiments or produce measurements. Its conclusions come from expert judgement, organized into large tables and figures. The authors grade how relevant each quantum internet trend is to each automotive requirement, and these grades drive the final list of synergies and use cases. They also note that the analysis assumes ideal conditions and that actual deployment would require large investment and carry high risk. The main value of the paper is therefore strategic: it gives researchers and companies a checklist of where quantum internet technology and automotive needs might meet, and it proposes a method that could be reused for other industries.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the short-term (<10 years) hardware miniaturization and automation of quantum internet technology provides a synergy interface between the two domains. For the long-term (>=10 years) the paper develops a comprehensive list of use cases and finds considerable relevancy of augmenting autonomous driving, vehicle ad hoc networks and sensor fusion with blind quantum computing, anonymous transmission and quantum cryptographic tools.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusions depend on author assigned relevance scores in Figures 3 through 5. Section IIA2 says the trend list is 'based on expert knowledge and global quantum internet research', and Section IIIA defines relevancy as low or high without a rubric or inter-rater validation. If another expert panel scored the interfaces differently, the synergy region and use case priorities could shift. This subjectivity is load bearing because every later conclusion is read off these matrices.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a qualitative use-case analysis connecting quantum internet research trends and future applications with automotive industry megatrends. It maps quantum internet research trends onto automotive pre-PDP requirements (Figure 3), evaluates synergies on a short-term (<10 year) horizon (Figure 4), and assesses long-term (≥10 year) automotive use cases against quantum internet applications (Figure 5). The headline conclusions are that short-term synergy concentrates in hardware miniaturization and automation, and that long-term applications such as blind quantum computing, anonymous transmission, and quantum cryptography are considerably relevant for autonomous driving, VANETs, and sensor fusion.

Significance. If the qualitative relevance assessments are credible, the paper provides a useful scoping framework for cross-industry quantum internet adoption and a transferable methodology for other sectors. The authors are transparent about the optimal-scenario assumption (Section V) and make supporting data available. However, the central conclusions rest entirely on expert-assigned relevance scores for which no rubric, inter-rater validation, or sensitivity analysis is provided; this is a load-bearing validity gap that limits the reproducibility and evidentiary weight of the claimed findings.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IIIA, Figures 3–5] The relevance ratings that drive the synergy evaluation and use-case priorities are defined only as 'low' or 'high' based on whether trends 'have a high degree of interfacing' (Section IIIA). No scoring rubric, criteria for intermediate levels, inter-rater reliability assessment, or sensitivity analysis is provided. Because every later conclusion—the synergy region in Figure 4 and the use-case relevance in Figure 5—is read directly off these matrices, another expert panel could plausibly shift the results and the headline claims. Please either define a transparent rubric with explicit criteria, report inter-rater agreement, or include a sensitivity analysis showing that the qualitative conclusions are robust to plausible variations in the ratings.
  2. [Abstract and Section IIA2] The abstract and Section IV describe a 'comprehensive list of use cases' and a 'comprehensive mapping' of quantum internet megatrends, but Section IIA2 states that the trend list is 'non-exhaustive' and that 'exact trend recognition can vary by expertise.' These statements are in tension. Please qualify the comprehensiveness claim or justify it explicitly, for example by specifying the breadth of sources and the selection criteria used.
  3. [Section IIIC and Figure 1] The paper introduces 'quantum antennas' as a means of dynamic free-space entanglement distribution while driving, but this concept is not defined or referenced. Since it is not a standard, established device in the quantum internet literature, it should either be clearly flagged as an assumed future capability or supported with appropriate references, and its feasibility should be discussed.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section IB] The text mentions 'pre-PEP requirements' in the paragraph on the pre-PDP process; this appears to be a typo for 'pre-PDP' and should be corrected for consistency.
  2. [Figure 3 caption] The caption states that relevance 'can be read bidirectionally,' but it does not explain what a bidirectional reading means for the low/high scale. Please clarify whether the rating applies symmetrically to both domains or whether separate directional ratings are intended.
  3. [Section IIIB, Figure 4] The synergy region in Figure 4 spans all functionality levels on the vertical axis, yet the text says the bottom of the region is near-term and the top is long-term. Please clarify how the vertical position within the region translates to a concrete time horizon, or note that the region intentionally covers all levels as the current text states.
  4. [Data availability] The data availability statement points to a repository but does not specify what data are included. Please state whether the data comprise the raw relevance matrices underlying Figures 3–5, as this is essential for reproducibility.
  5. [Section IIA2] The phrase 'based on expert knowledge and global quantum internet research' would benefit from a brief description of the expertise of the authors and the specific sources consulted, so the reader can assess the authority of the trend selection.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the interfacing analysis is a transparent qualitative expert assessment, not a fitted prediction or self-citation-derived derivation.

full rationale

The paper does not claim to derive quantitative predictions from first principles. Its central outputs—the short-term synergy in miniaturization/automation and the long-term relevance of blind quantum computing, anonymous transmission, and quantum cryptography for autonomous driving and VANETs—are qualitative summaries of the relevance matrices in Figures 3–5. The authors explicitly describe these as assessments: relevancy is defined in Section IIIA as low or high based on whether trends 'have a high degree of interfacing,' and the trend list in Section IIA2 is stated to be 'based on expert knowledge and global quantum internet research' and non-exhaustive. No parameter is fitted to external data and then renamed as a prediction; no equation is used in a way that reduces to its own input. The self-citations that exist (e.g., experimental papers [41], [94], [101] and the methodology chapter [131]) are not load-bearing for the main conclusions: the experimental citations support independent, verifiable state-of-the-art facts, and the methodology citation supports a generic brainstorming approach that is also described in the text. The subjectivity of the expert scores is a validity limitation, not a circularity, because the conclusions are explicitly presented as the outcomes of that same qualitative assessment rather than as independent discoveries forced by a self-referential construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper's conclusions rest on a small set of domain assumptions about transferability of pre-PDP requirements, the continuity of VDA megatrends, the developmental arc of quantum internet functionality, and the validity of the authors' expert relevance ratings. No numeric parameters are fitted to data. The only invented concept, quantum antennas, is a proposed infrastructure placeholder without independent support.

free parameters (1)
  • Relevance ratings for quantum internet trend and pre-PDP requirement interfaces (Figure 3) = Categorical low/high; no numeric values
    The synergy mapping in Figure 4 and the use case relevance in Figure 5 are derived from author-assigned relevance categories, not from measured data. No inter-rater reliability or external benchmark is provided.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Automotive pre-PDP requirements can be generalized from the sensor component selection matrix of [58] to quantum technologies.
    Section IIB2 states that the authors extract the requirements set from [58] and generalize it as a method for technology transfer to the vehicle ecosystem. The interfacing analysis assumes this transfer is valid.
  • domain assumption VDA automotive megatrends defined up to 2030 remain continuously relevant for the extended >=10 year horizon.
    Section IIB says the authors focus on the VDA megatrends up to 2030 and extend that timeline to >=10 years from publication, given continuous relevancy.
  • domain assumption Quantum internet functionality will advance through the stages of entanglement generation, few-qubit fault tolerant, and full quantum computing on the time horizons used.
    Section IIA2 and Figure 2 map trend relevance to the functionality scale of [15]; the short-term and long-term split assumes this developmental arc.
  • ad hoc to paper Expert knowledge of the authors is a valid basis for trend selection and relevance assessment.
    Section IIA2 says the trends are shown based on expert knowledge and global quantum internet research. The paper's conclusions are built on these subjective judgements.
invented entities (1)
  • Quantum antenna
    purpose: A free-space optical interface that would distribute flying qubits to vehicles while driving, enabling entanglement generation with moving cars.
    Introduced in Section IIIC as a proposed concept ('we shall denote as quantum antennas'). No hardware implementation, feasibility study, or experimental evidence is given; it is a roadmap term rather than a demonstrated device.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum Internet Use Case Analysis for the Automotive Industry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3BUARUFP

@misc{pith2026250119070,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum Internet Use Case Analysis for the Automotive Industry},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3BUARUFP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.19070}
}
abstract

A future quantum internet brings promising applications related to security, privacy and enabling distributed quantum computing. Integration of these concepts into the future trends of the automotive sector is of considerable interest, as it enables both the development of practical quantum internet use cases and the adoption of innovative technologies in the automotive sector. In this work we analyze cross-platform megatrends in both the quantum internet and the automotive industry, identifying mutually beneficial regions of interest. In the short-term ($<10$ years) hardware miniaturization and automation of quantum internet technology provides a synergy interface between the two domains. For the long-term ($\geq10$ years) we develop a comprehensive list of use cases for the quantum internet within the automotive sector. We find considerable relevancy of augmenting autonomous driving, vehicle ad hoc networks and sensor fusion with blind quantum computing, anonymous transmission and quantum cryptographic tools. These results can be used to target future research, engineering and venture developments for both domains. Furthermore, our approach can be applied to other industries, enabling a structured methodology for identifying and developing feasible use cases for the quantum internet in diverse domains.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.19070 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

146 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Autonomous driving and connectivity b

    Automotive F uture T rends The VDA defines the following megatrend categories: a. Autonomous driving and connectivity b. Infrastructure c. Mobility and logistics d. Production e. Materials f. Drivetrain and vehicle g. Energy carrier and storage 8 We highlight in italic the megatrends we will discuss in this paper. The selected megatrends are those that ac...

  2. [2]

    Quantum Internet Research T rends In this section we will define research trends, and per- form a mapping of those trends to their technological maturity in the quantum internet domain. We will use this maturity mapping to determine whether there is a relevant interface between the quantum internet trends and design considerations in the automotive pre-PD...

  3. [3]

    Pre-PDP Requirements In this section we discuss the pre-PDP requirements that are suited for assessing interfacing relevancy with the current research tracks of the quantum internet. a. Vehicle & infrastructure We define this category of requirements as system re- quirements for products that are aimed to be included in a vehicle and the (out-of-vehicle) ...

  4. [4]

    We can state that the megatrends of optimization and cryp- tography are a layer before being considered as pre-PDP requirement

    Theory Trends in quantum internet theory developments are largely disconnected from production requirements. We can state that the megatrends of optimization and cryp- tography are a layer before being considered as pre-PDP requirement. Quantum cryptography is solely related to cybersecurity aspects of pre-PDP requirements, as they will have to comply to ...

  5. [5]

    Hardware Thehighestrelevancyininterfacingcanbefoundinthe hardware megatrends, which is a natural overlap given that the pre-PDP requirements are largely hardware fo- cused. a. Next-gen & miniaturization Hardware megatrends directly relate to product inte- gration into a vehicle. It is a necessity to have character- ized performance of quantum internet har...

  6. [6]

    Software The standardization of both hardware and software re- lated to quantum internet technology results in this field 11 Research trend Pre-PDP requirements Scheduling and routing Characterized performance Orchestration of entanglement distribution Node placement in network Modeling hardware requirements Repeater schemes Benchmarking network performan...

  7. [7]

    Where in functionality level is each quantum inter- net megatrend relevant? (vertical axis)

  8. [8]

    It is those trends that allow for two-way exchange of expertise and require- ments

    How relevant is that megatrend for the pre-PDP requirements? (horizontal axis) This combination allows us to map which quantum inter- net research trends have the ideal combination of being both near-term relevant in their development and highly relevant as pre-PDP requirements. It is those trends that allow for two-way exchange of expertise and require- ...

Show all 146 references
  1. [9]

    QuTech Part II Applied-oriented research

    Synergy regions a. Vehicle & infrastructure Miniaturization has significant potential for synergy with the pre-PDP vehicle and infrastructure require- ments. As mentioned in Section IIIA2a, we identify short-term interfaces in miniaturization: • Form factor • Modularity • Inte...

  2. [10]

    NHTSA, Automated Vehicles for Safety - NHTSA, ac- cessed on 6 May 2024

    2024

  3. [11]

    Lakshmanan, The story of evolution of the in-car in- fotainmentsystem(withspecialthrowbacktothe1990s) (2024), accessed on 6 May 2024

    L. Lakshmanan, The story of evolution of the in-car in- fotainmentsystem(withspecialthrowbacktothe1990s) (2024), accessed on 6 May 2024

    2024

  4. [12]

    Abdelkader, K

    G. Abdelkader, K. Elgazzar, and A. Khamis, Connected Vehicles: Technology Review, State of the Art, Chal- lenges and Opportunities, Sensors21, 7712 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    Checkoway, D

    S. Checkoway, D. McCoy, B. Kantor, D. Anderson, H.Shacham, S.Savage, K.Koscher, A.Czeskis, F.Roes- ner, and T. Kohno, Comprehensive experimental analy- ses of automotive attack surfaces, in20th USENIX Se- curity Symposium (USENIX Security 11)(USENIX As- sociation, San Francisc...

    2011

  6. [14]

    Olufowobi and G

    H. Olufowobi and G. Bloom, Connected Cars: Auto- motive Cybersecurity and Privacy for Smart Cities, in Smart Cities Cybersecurity and Privacy, edited by D. B. Rawat and K. Z. Ghafoor (Elsevier, 2019) Chap. 16, pp. 227–240

    2019

  7. [15]

    S. K. Khan, N. Shiwakoti, P. Stasinopoulos, and Y. Chen, Cyber-attacks in the next-generation cars, mitigation techniques, anticipated readiness and future directions, Accident Analysis & Prevention148, 105837 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    Takahashi, M

    J. Takahashi, M. Iwamura, and M. Tanaka, Security Threat Analysis of Automotive Infotainment Systems, in 2020 IEEE 92nd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2020-Fall) (2020) pp. 1–7, iSSN: 2577-2465

    2020

  9. [17]

    Pekaric, C

    I. Pekaric, C. Sauerwein, S. Haselwanter, and M. Felderer, A taxonomy of attack mechanisms in the automotive domain, Computer Standards & Interfaces 78, 103539 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    Renganathan, E

    V. Renganathan, E. Yurtsever, Q. Ahmed, and A. Yener, Valet attack on privacy: a cybersecurity threat in automotive Bluetooth infotainment systems, Cybersecurity 5, 30 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Shor, Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring, in Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science(1994) pp

    P. Shor, Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring, in Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science(1994) pp. 124–134

    1994

  12. [20]

    L. K. Grover, A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search, inProceedings of the twenty-eighth an- nual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC ’96 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1996) pp. 212–219

    1996

  13. [21]

    Lloyd, Universal Quantum Simulators, Science273, 1073 (1996)

    S. Lloyd, Universal Quantum Simulators, Science273, 1073 (1996)

    1996

  14. [22]

    Preskill, Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond, Quantum 2, 79 (2018)

    J. Preskill, Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond, Quantum 2, 79 (2018)

    2018

  15. [23]

    H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature453, 1023 (2008)

    2008

  16. [24]

    Wehner, D

    S. Wehner, D. Elkouss, and R. Hanson, Quantum inter- net: A vision for the road ahead, Science362, eaam9288 (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    W.C.CampbellandP.Hamilton,Rotationsensingwith trapped ions, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics50, 064002 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    Degen, F

    C. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 035002 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    Pirandola, B

    S. Pirandola, B. R. Bardhan, T. Gehring, C. Weed- brook, and S. Lloyd, Advances in photonic quantum sensing, Nature Photonics12, 724 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    Yarkoni, F

    S. Yarkoni, F. Neukart, E. M. G. Tagle, N. Magiera, B. Mehta, K. Hire, S. Narkhede, and M. Hofmann, Quantum Shuttle: traffic navigation with Quantum computing,in Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSOFT In- ternational Workshop on Architectures and Paradigms for Engineering Quantum ...

    2020

  21. [29]

    Burkacky, L

    O. Burkacky, L. Pautasso, and N. Mohr, Will quantum computing drive the automotive future (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    Bayerstadler, G

    A. Bayerstadler, G. Becquin, J. Binder, T. Botter, H. Ehm, T. Ehmer, M. Erdmann, N. Gaus, P. Harbach, M. Hess, J. Klepsch, M. Leib, S. Luber, A. Luckow, M. Mansky, W. Mauerer, F. Neukart, C. Niedermeier, L.Palackal, R.Pfeiffer, C.Polenz, J.Sepulveda, T.Siev- ers, B. Standen, M...

    2021

  23. [31]

    Yarkoni, A

    S. Yarkoni, A. Alekseyenko, M. Streif, D. Von Dollen, F. Neukart, and T. Bäck, Multi-car paint shop opti- mization with quantum annealing, in2021 IEEE Inter- national Conference on Quantum Computing and Engi- neering (QCE)(IEEE, 2021) pp. 35–41

    2021

  24. [32]

    Bouwmeester, J.-W

    D. Bouwmeester, J.-W. Pan, K. Mattle, M. Eibl, H. We- infurter, and A. Zeilinger, Experimental quantum tele- portation, Nature 390, 575 (1997)

    1997

  25. [33]

    Van Meter, Teleportation, inQuantum Networking (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2014) Chap

    R. Van Meter, Teleportation, inQuantum Networking (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2014) Chap. 4, pp. 79–89

    2014

  26. [34]

    W. K. Wootters and W. H. Zurek, A single quantum cannot be cloned, Nature299, 802 (1982)

    1982

  27. [35]

    C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, Quantum cryptogra- phy: Public key distribution and coin tossing, Theoret- ical Computer Science Theoretical Aspects of Quantum Cryptography – celebrating 30 years of BB84,560, 7 (2014)

    2014

  28. [36]

    Van Meter, Purification and entanglement swapping- based repeaters, inQuantum Networking (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2014) Chap

    R. Van Meter, Purification and entanglement swapping- based repeaters, inQuantum Networking (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2014) Chap. 10, pp. 195–217

    2014

  29. [37]

    A.K.Ekert,QuantumcryptographybasedonBell’sthe- orem, Physical Review Letters67, 661 (1991)

    1991

  30. [38]

    Van Meter, Quantum key distribution, inQuantum Networking (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2014) Chap

    R. Van Meter, Quantum key distribution, inQuantum Networking (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2014) Chap. 5, pp. 91–111

    2014

  31. [39]

    Stanley, Y

    M. Stanley, Y. Gui, D. Unnikrishnan, S. Hall, and I. Fa- tadin, Recent progress in quantum key distribution net- work deployments and standards, inJournal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 2416 (IOP Publishing, 2022) p. 012001

    2022

  32. [40]

    ID Quantique, Quantum-Safe Security Products (2024), accessed through Wayback Machine 10 May 2024

    2024

  33. [41]

    Toshiba, Quantum Key Distribution - What Is QKD? How Does It Work? (2024), accessed through Wayback Machine 7 Jan 2024

    2024

  34. [42]

    MagiQ Technologies, MagiQ QPN™| Network Security | Somerville, MA (2024), accessed through Wayback Ma- chine 10 May 2024

    2024

  35. [43]

    Quintessence Labs, QOptica™ Quantum Key Distribu- tion Product Sheet, accessed through Wayback Machine 17 May 2024. 19

    2024

  36. [44]

    NIST, Post-quantum cryptography standardization (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    Horizon Europe, Quantum Internet Alliance - Phase1, grant agreement ID: 101102140

  38. [46]

    P. C. Humphreys, N. Kalb, J. P. J. Morits, R. N. Schouten, R. F. L. Vermeulen, D. J. Twitchen, M. Markham, and R. Hanson, Deterministic delivery of remote entanglement on a quantum network, Nature 558, 268 (2018)

    2018

  39. [47]

    Pompili, S

    M. Pompili, S. L. N. Hermans, S. Baier, H. K. C. Beukers, P. C. Humphreys, R. N. Schouten, R. F. L. Vermeulen, M. J. Tiggelman, L. dos Santos Martins, B. Dirkse, S. Wehner, and R. Hanson, Realization of a multinode quantum network of remote solid-state qubits, Science 372, 259 (2021)

    2021

  40. [48]

    Liu, X.-Y

    J.-L. Liu, X.-Y. Luo, Y. Yu, C.-Y. Wang, B. Wang, Y. Hu, J. Li, M.-Y. Zheng, B. Yao, Z. Yan, D. Teng, J.-W. Jiang, X.-B. Liu, X.-P. Xie, J. Zhang, Q.-H. Mao, X. Jiang, Q. Zhang, X.-H. Bao, and J.-W. Pan, A multinode quantum network over a metropolitan area (2023), arXiv:2309.00221

    2023 arXiv

  41. [49]

    J. V. Rakonjac, S. Grandi, S. Wengerowsky, D. Lago- Rivera, F. Appas, and H. d. Riedmatten, Transmission of light–matter entanglement over a metropolitan net- work, Optica Quantum1, 94 (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    A. J. Stolk, K. L. van der Enden, M.-C. Slater, I. te Raa- Derckx, P. Botma, J. van Rantwijk, J. J. B. Biemond, R. A. J. Hagen, R. W. Herfst, W. D. Koek, A. J. H. Meskers, R. Vollmer, E. J. van Zwet, M. Markham, A. M. Edmonds, J. F. Geus, F. Elsen, B. Jungbluth, C. Haefner, C....

    2024

  43. [51]

    IBISWorld, IBISWorld - Industry Market Research, Re- ports, and Statistics (2024), accessed on 7 May 2024

    2024

  44. [52]

    The European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association, The automobile industry: Pocket guide 2023/2024 (2023), accessed through Wayback Machine 10 Nov 2023

    2023

  45. [53]

    The European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association, R&D investment by top 10 industrial sectors in the EU (2023)

    2023

  46. [54]

    Hafner and D

    A. Hafner and D. Modic, European automotive tech- nological innovation systems in the age of disruption: The suppliers’ view, Research in Social Change12, 53 (2020)

    2020

  47. [55]

    M.Broy,Challengesinautomotivesoftwareengineering, in Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering, ICSE ’06 (Association for Com- puting Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2006) pp. 33– 42

    2006

  48. [56]

    H.-T. Lim, L. Völker, and D. Herrscher, Challenges in a future ip/ethernet-based in-car network for real-time applications, in 2011 48th ACM/EDAC/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC)(2011) pp. 7–12

    2011

  49. [57]

    Greengard, Automotive systems get smarter, Com- mun

    S. Greengard, Automotive systems get smarter, Com- mun. ACM 58, 18–20 (2015)

    2015

  50. [58]

    Macher, A

    G. Macher, A. Höller, E. Armengaud, and C. Kreiner, Automotive embedded software: Migration challenges to multi-core computing platforms, in2015 IEEE 13th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (IN- DIN) (2015) pp. 1386–1393

    2015

  51. [59]

    Navet and F

    N. Navet and F. Simonot-Lion,Automotive embedded systems handbook(CRC press, 2017)

    2017

  52. [60]

    O.Burkacky, J.Deichmann,andJ.P.Stein,Automotive software and electronics 2030 (2019)

    2019

  53. [61]

    SAE International, J3016_202104: Taxonomy and Def- initions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Sys- tems for On-Road Motor Vehicles

  54. [62]

    Malik and W

    S. Malik and W. Sun, Analysis and Simulation of Cyber Attacks Against Connected and Autonomous Vehicles, in 2020 International Conference on Connected and Au- tonomous Driving (MetroCAD)(2020) pp. 62–70

    2020

  55. [63]

    N. Lu, N. Cheng, N. Zhang, X. Shen, and J. W. Mark, Connected Vehicles: Solutions and Challenges, IEEE Internet of Things Journal1, 289 (2014)

    2014

  56. [64]

    Farsimadan, F

    E. Farsimadan, F. Palmieri, L. Moradi, D. Conte, and B. Paternoster, Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) Commu- nication Scenarios for Vehicular Ad-hoc Networking (VANET): An Overview, inComputational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2021, edited by O. Gervasi, B. Murgante, S. Mis...

    2021

  57. [65]

    ISO, ISO 16750-1:2023 Road vehicles - Environmen- tal conditions and testing for electrical and electronic equipment (2023)

    2023

  58. [66]

    Rudert and J

    S. Rudert and J. Trumpfheller, Well considered - the product development process (2015), accessed on 16 May 2024

    2015

  59. [67]

    Winner, S

    H. Winner, S. Hakuli, and G. Wolf, Sensorik fu¨ r fahrerassistenzsysteme, in Handbuch Fahrerassisten- zsysteme: Grundlagen, Komponenten und Systeme für aktive Sicherheit und Komfort(Springer-Verlag, 2011) Chap. 15, pp. 221–228

    2011

  60. [68]

    Filipovic and A.-M

    E. Filipovic and A.-M. Großmann, Npd knowledge transfer via standards and patents? a case study, in ISPIM Conference Proceedings(The International So- ciety for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM), filipovic2014npd) p. 1

  61. [69]

    Singh, M

    S. Singh, M. Doosti, N. Mathur, M. Delavar, A. Mantri, H. Ollivier, and E. Kashefi, Towards a unified quan- tum protocol framework: Classification, implementa- tion, and use cases (2023), arXiv:2310.12780 [quant-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Awschalom, K

    D. Awschalom, K. K. Berggren, H. Bernien, S. Bhave, L. D. Carr, P. Davids, S. E. Economou, D. Englund, A. Faraon, M. Fejer, S. Guha, M. V. Gustafsson, E. Hu, L. Jiang, J. Kim, B. Korzh, P. Kumar, P. G. Kwiat, M. Lončar, M. D. Lukin, D. A. Miller, C. Monroe, S. W. Nam, P. Naran...

    2021

  63. [71]

    Broadbent, J

    A. Broadbent, J. Fitzsimons, and E. Kashefi, Univer- sal Blind Quantum Computation, in2009 50th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (2009) pp. 517–526, iSSN: 0272-5428

    2009

  64. [72]

    J. F. Fitzsimons and E. Kashefi, Unconditionally veri- fiable blind quantum computation, Physical Review A 96, 012303 (2017)

    2017

  65. [73]

    Christandl and S

    M. Christandl and S. Wehner, Quantum Anony- mous Transmissions, inAdvances in Cryptology - ASI- ACRYPT 2005,editedbyB.Roy(Springer,Berlin, Hei- delberg, 2005) pp. 217–235

    2005

  66. [74]

    Bouda and J

    J. Bouda and J. Sprojcar, Anonymous Transmission 20 of Quantum Information, in 2007 First International Conference on Quantum, Nano, and Micro Technolo- gies (ICQNM’07)(2007) pp. 12–12

    2007

  67. [75]

    Unnikrishnan, I

    A. Unnikrishnan, I. J. MacFarlane, R. Yi, E. Diamanti, D. Markham, and I. Kerenidis, Anonymity for practi- cal quantum networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 240501 (2019)

    2019

  68. [76]

    Barnum, C

    H. Barnum, C. Crépeau, D. Gottesman, A. Smith, and A. Tapp, Authentication of quantum messages, inThe 43rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Com- puter Science, 2002. Proceedings.(IEEE, 2002) pp. 449– 458

    2002

  69. [77]

    Gottesman and I

    D. Gottesman and I. Chuang, Quantum digital signa- tures (2001), arXiv:quant-ph/0105032 [quant-ph]

    2001 arXiv

  70. [78]

    I. V. Puthoor, R. Amiri, P. Wallden, M. Curty, and E. Andersson, Measurement-device-independent quan- tum digital signatures, Physical Review A94, 022328 (2016)

    2016

  71. [79]

    Chen, W.-F

    F.-L. Chen, W.-F. Liu, S.-G. Chen, and Z.-H. Wang, Public-key quantum digital signature scheme with one- time pad private-key, Quantum Information Processing 17, 10 (2017)

    2017

  72. [80]

    Broadbent and R

    A. Broadbent and R. Islam, Quantum encryption with certified deletion, in Theory of Cryptography: 18th International Conference, TCC 2020, Durham, NC, USA, November 16–19, 2020, Proceedings, Part III 18 (Springer, 2020) pp. 92–122

    2020

  73. [81]

    Chen, M.-R

    J.-H. Chen, M.-R. Chen, G.-Q. Zeng, and J.-S. Weng, Bdfl: A byzantine-fault-tolerance decentralized feder- ated learning method for autonomous vehicle, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology70, 8639 (2021)

    2021

  74. [82]

    C.-F.Cheng, G.Srivastava, J.C.-W.Lin,andY.-C.Lin, Fault-tolerance mechanisms for software-defined inter- net of vehicles, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Trans- portation Systems 22, 3859 (2021)

    2021

  75. [83]

    Ben-Or and A

    M. Ben-Or and A. Hassidim, Fast quantum byzantine agreement, inProceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC ’05 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2005) p. 481–485

    2005

  76. [84]

    Giovannetti, S

    V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum- enhanced positioning and clock synchronization, Nature 412, 417 (2001)

    2001

  77. [85]

    Lipiński, T

    M. Lipiński, T. Włostowski, J. Serrano, and P. Al- varez, White rabbit: A ptp application for robust sub- nanosecond synchronization, in 2011 IEEE Interna- tional Symposium on Precision Clock Synchronization for Measurement, Control and Communication(IEEE,

    2011

  78. [86]

    Templier, P

    S. Templier, P. Cheiney, Q. d’Armagnac de Castanet, B.Gouraud, H.Porte, F.Napolitano, P.Bouyer, B.Bat- telier, and B. Barrett, Tracking the vector acceleration with a hybrid quantum accelerometer triad, Science Ad- vances 8, eadd3854 (2022)

    2022

  79. [87]

    Salducci, Y

    C. Salducci, Y. Bidel, M. Cadoret, S. Darmon, N. Za- hzam, A. Bonnin, S. Schwartz, C. Blanchard, and A. Bresson, Quantum sensing of acceleration and rota- tionbyinterferingmagneticallylaunchedatoms,Science Advances 10, eadq4498 (2024)

    2024

  80. [88]

    Battelier, B

    B. Battelier, B. Barrett, L. Fouché, L. Chichet, L. Antoni-Micollier, H. Porte, F. Napolitano, J. Lautier, A. Landragin, and P. Bouyer, Development of compact cold-atom sensors for inertial navigation, inQuantum Optics, Vol. 9900 (SPIE, 2016) pp. 21–37

    2016

  81. [89]

    Gauthier, G

    S. Gauthier, G. Vardoyan, and S. Wehner, A control architecture for entanglement generation switches in quantum networks, inProceedings of the 1st Workshop on Quantum Networks and Distributed Quantum Com- puting, QuNet ’23 (Association for Computing Machin- ery, New York, NY, ...

    2023

  82. [90]

    Gauthier, T

    S. Gauthier, T. Vasantam, and G. Vardoyan, An on-demand resource allocation algorithm for a quan- tum network hub and its performance analysis (2024), arXiv:2405.18066 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Rabbie, K

    J. Rabbie, K. Chakraborty, G. Avis, and S. Wehner, Designing quantum networks using preexisting infras- tructure, npj Quantum Information8, 1 (2022)

    2022

  84. [92]

    Vardoyan, M

    G. Vardoyan, M. Skrzypczyk, and S. Wehner, On the quantum performance evaluation of two distributed quantum architectures, ACM SIGMETRICS Perfor- mance Evaluation Review49, 30 (2022)

    2022

  85. [93]

    Á. G. Iñesta and S. Wehner, Performance metrics for thecontinuousdistributionofentanglementinmultiuser quantum networks, Physical Review A 108, 052615 (2023)

    2023

  86. [94]

    Drmota, D

    P. Drmota, D. P. Nadlinger, D. Main, B. C. Nichol, E. M. Ainley, D. Leichtle, A. Mantri, E. Kashefi, R. Srinivas, G. Araneda, C. J. Ballance, and D. M. Lu- cas, Verifiable blind quantum computing with trapped ions and single photons (2024), arXiv:2305.02936

    2024 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Bradac, W

    C. Bradac, W. Gao, J. Forneris, M. E. Trusheim, and I. Aharonovich, Quantum nanophotonics with group iv defects in diamond, Nature Communications10, 5625 (2019)

    2019

  88. [96]

    N. T. Son, C. P. Anderson, A. Bourassa, K. C. Miao, C. Babin, M. Widmann, M. Niethammer, J. Ul Hassan, N. Morioka, I. G. Ivanov, F. Kaiser, J. Wrachtrup, and D. D. Awschalom, Developing silicon carbide for quan- tum spintronics, Applied Physics Letters 116, 190501 (2020)

    2020

  89. [97]

    Simmons, Scalable Fault-Tolerant Quantum Tech- nologies with Silicon Color Centers, PRX Quantum5, 010102 (2024)

    S. Simmons, Scalable Fault-Tolerant Quantum Tech- nologies with Silicon Color Centers, PRX Quantum5, 010102 (2024)

    2024

  90. [98]

    Esmaeil Zadeh, J

    I. Esmaeil Zadeh, J. W. N. Los, R. B. M. Gour- gues, V. Steinmetz, G. Bulgarini, S. M. Dobrovolskiy, V. Zwiller, and S. N. Dorenbos, Single-photon detec- tors combining high efficiency, high detection rates, and ultra-high timing resolution, APL Photonics2, 111301 (2017)

    2017

  91. [99]

    M. Bock, P. Eich, S. Kucera, M. Kreis, A. Lenhard, C. Becher, and J. Eschner, High-fidelity entanglement between a trapped ion and a telecom photon via quan- tum frequency conversion, Nature Communications9, 1998 (2018)

    2018

  92. [100]

    Dréau, A

    A. Dréau, A. Tchebotareva, A. E. Mahdaoui, C. Bonato, and R. Hanson, Quantum frequency conversion of sin- gle photons from a nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond to telecommunication wavelengths, Phys. Rev. Appl.9, 064031 (2018)

    2018

  93. [101]

    van Leent, M

    T. van Leent, M. Bock, R. Garthoff, K. Redeker, W. Zhang, T. Bauer, W. Rosenfeld, C. Becher, and H. Weinfurter, Long-Distance Distribution of Atom- Photon Entanglement at Telecom Wavelength, Physical Review Letters 124, 010510 (2020)

    2020

  94. [102]

    Schäfer, B

    M. Schäfer, B. Kambs, D. Herrmann, T. Bauer, and C.Becher,Two-stage, lownoisequantumfrequencycon- version of single photons from silicon-vacancy centers in diamond to the telecom c-band, Advanced Quantum 21 Technologies , 2300228 (2023)

    2023

  95. [103]

    J. Geus, F. Elsen, S. Nyga, A. Stolk, K. van der Enden, E. van Zwet, C. Haefner, R. Hanson, and B. Jungbluth, Low-noise short-wavelength pumped frequency down- conversionfor quantum frequency converters (2023),op- tica Open 107563

    2023

  96. [104]

    Sipahigil, R

    A. Sipahigil, R. E. Evans, D. D. Sukachev, M. J. Bu- rek, J. Borregaard, M. K. Bhaskar, C. T. Nguyen, J. L. Pacheco, H. A. Atikian, C. Meuwly, R. M. Camacho, F. Jelezko, E. Bielejec, H. Park, M. Lončar, and M. D. Lukin, An integrated diamond nanophotonics platform for quantum-...

    2016

  97. [105]

    Pingault, M

    P.-J.Stas, Y.Q.Huan, B.Machielse, E.N.Knall, A.Su- leymanzade, B. Pingault, M. Sutula, S. W. Ding, C. M. Knaut, D. R. Assumpcao, Y.-C. Wei, M. K. Bhaskar, R. Riedinger, D. D. Sukachev, H. Park, M. Lončar, D. S. Levonian, and M. D. Lukin, Robust multi-qubit quan- tum network no...

    2022

  98. [106]

    Pasini, N

    M. Pasini, N. Codreanu, T. Turan, A. R. Moral, C. F. Primavera, L. D. Santis, H. K. C. Beukers, J. M. Brevo- ord, C. Waas, J. Borregaard, and R. Hanson, Nonlin- ear quantum photonics with a tin-vacancy center cou- pled to a one-dimensional diamond waveguide (2023), arXiv:2311....

    2023 arXiv

  99. [107]

    R. A. Parker, J. Arjona Martínez, K. C. Chen, A. M. Stramma, I. B. Harris, C. P. Michaels, M. E. Trusheim, M. Hayhurst Appel, C. M. Purser, W. G. Roth, D. En- glund, and M. Atatüre, A diamond nanophotonic inter- face with an optically accessible deterministic electronu- clear ...

    2024

  100. [108]

    J.-S. Park, S. Subramanian, L. Lampert, T. Mlade- nov, I. Klotchkov, D. J. Kurian, E. Juarez-Hernandez, B. Perez-Esparza, S. R. Kale, K. T. Asma Beevi, S. Pre- maratne, T. Watson, S. Suzuki, M. Rahman, J. B. Tim- badiya, S. Soni, and S. Pellerano, A Fully Integrated Cryo-CMOS ...

    2021

  101. [109]

    Ruffino, T.-Y

    A. Ruffino, T.-Y. Yang, J. Michniewicz, Y. Peng, E. Charbon, and M. F. Gonzalez-Zalba, A cryo-CMOS chip that integrates silicon quantum dots and multi- plexed dispersive readout electronics, Nature Electron- ics 5, 53 (2022)

    2022

  102. [110]

    A. J. Stolk, K. L. van der Enden, M.-C. Roehsner, A. Teepe, S. O. J. Faes, C. E. Bradley, S. Cadot, J. van Rantwijk, I. te Raa, R. A. J. Hagen, A. Ver- laan, J. Biemond, A. Khorev, R. Vollmer, M. Markham, A. Edmonds, J. Morits, T. Taminiau, E. van Zwet, and R. Hanson, Telecom-...

    2022

  103. [111]

    Gaurab Bose, Google Cloud: Standard Tier Data Transfer now offers a 99.9% availability SLA, Accessed through Wayback Machine 9 Feb 2024 (2023)

    2023

  104. [112]

    Chakraborty, F

    K. Chakraborty, F. Rozpedek, A. Dahlberg, and S. Wehner, Distributed routing in a quantum internet (2019), arXiv:1907.11630 [quant-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Simon, Towards a global quantum network, Nature Photonics 11, 678 (2017)

    C. Simon, Towards a global quantum network, Nature Photonics 11, 678 (2017)

    2017

  106. [114]

    de Forges de Parny, O

    L. de Forges de Parny, O. Alibart, J. Debaud, S. Gres- sani, A. Lagarrigue, A. Martin, A. Metrat, M. Schi- avon, T. Troisi, E. Diamanti, P. Gélard, E. Kerstel, S. Tanzilli, and M. Van Den Bossche, Satellite-based quantum information networks: use cases, architecture, and roadm...

    2023

  107. [115]

    Reimer, M

    C. Reimer, M. Kues, P. Roztocki, B. Wetzel, F. Grazioso, B. E. Little, S. T. Chu, T. Johnston, Y. Bromberg, L. Caspani, D. J. Moss, and R. Moran- dotti, Generation of multiphoton entangled quantum states by means of integrated frequency combs, Science 351, 1176 (2016)

    2016

  108. [116]

    M. J. Weaver, P. Duivestein, A. C. Bernasconi, S. Scharmer, M. Lemang, T. C. v. Thiel, F. Hijazi, B.Hensen, S.Gröblacher,andR.Stockill,Anintegrated microwave-to-opticsinterfaceforscalablequantumcom- puting, Nature Nanotechnology19, 166 (2024)

    2024

  109. [117]

    Rozpundefineddek, M

    A.Dahlberg, M.Skrzypczyk, T.Coopmans, L.Wubben, F. Rozpundefineddek, M. Pompili, A. Stolk, P. Pawełczak, R. Knegjens, J. de Oliveira Filho, R. Hanson, and S. Wehner, A link layer protocol for quantum networks, inProceedings of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communicati...

    2019

  110. [118]

    Dahlberg, B

    A. Dahlberg, B. v. d. Vecht, C. D. Donne, M. Skrzypczyk, I. t. Raa, W. Kozlowski, and S. Wehner, NetQASM—a low-level instruction set architecture for hybrid quantum–classical programs in a quantum inter- net, Quantum Science and Technology7, 035023 (2022)

    2022

  111. [119]

    Coopmans, R

    T. Coopmans, R. Knegjens, A. Dahlberg, D. Maier, L. Nijsten, J. de Oliveira Filho, M. Papendrecht, J. Rabbie, F. Rozpędek, M. Skrzypczyk, L. Wubben, W. de Jong, D. Podareanu, A. Torres-Knoop, D. Elk- ouss, and S. Wehner, NetSquid, a NETwork Simulator for QUantum Information us...

    2021

  112. [120]

    X. Wu, A. Kolar, J. Chung, D. Jin, T. Zhong, R. Ket- timuthu, and M. Suchara, SeQUeNCe: a customizable discrete-event simulator of quantum networks, Quan- tum Science and Technology6, 045027 (2021)

    2021

  113. [121]

    QuTech, Quantum Network Explorer ADK (2024)

    2024

  114. [122]

    Forschungsvereinigung Automobiltechnik, Verband der Automobilindustrie, Die Automobilita ¨t der Zukunft (2021)

    2021

  115. [123]

    Forschungsvereinigung Automobiltechnik, Verband der Automobilindustrie, Roadmap fu¨ r die Automobilita¨t der Zukunft (2021)

    2021

  116. [124]

    Aspuru-Guzik, A

    A. Aspuru-Guzik, A. D. Dutoi, P. J. Love, and M. Head- Gordon, Simulated quantum computation of molecular energies, Science 309, 1704 (2005)

    2005

  117. [125]

    M. B. Hastings, D. Wecker, B. Bauer, and M. Troyer, Improving quantum algorithms for quantum chemistry, Quantum Info. Comput.15, 1–21 (2015)

    2015

  118. [126]

    B. G. Q. Team, J. Klepsch, J. R. Finžgar, F. Ki- wit, L. Hölscher, M. Erdmann, L. Müller, C. Kumar, and A. Luckow, Quantum computing for automotive applications: From algorithms to applications (2024), arXiv:2409.14183 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  119. [127]

    Campbell, N

    S. Campbell, N. O’Mahony, L. Krpalcova, D. Riordan, J. Walsh, A. Murphy, and C. Ryan, Sensor Technology in Autonomous Vehicles : A review, in2018 29th Irish Signals and Systems Conference (ISSC)(2018) pp. 1–4

    2018

  120. [128]

    plus10, Allow machines to learn from each other across 22 manufacturers (2022)

    2022

  121. [129]

    155 - Cyber security and cyber security management system (2021)

    UNECE, UN Regulation No. 155 - Cyber security and cyber security management system (2021)

    2021

  122. [130]

    156 - Software update and software update management system (2021)

    UNECE, UN Regulation No. 156 - Software update and software update management system (2021)

    2021

  123. [131]

    ISO, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information security, cyber- security and privacy protection - Information security management systems - Requirements (2022)

    2022

  124. [132]

    ISO/SAE, ISO/SAE 21434:2021 Road vehicles - Cyber- security engineering (2021)

    2021

  125. [133]

    ISO, ISO 26262-1:2018 Road Vehicles - Functional Safety (2018)

    2018

  126. [134]

    Seeck, J

    A. Seeck, J. C. Gail, B. Lorenz, M. Zöller, U. Seiffert, E. Fritzsche, H. Mankau, C. Repmann, A. Eilemann, M. Jung, E. Pantow, A. Wiebelt, and J. Honeder, An- forderungen, zielkonflikte, grundlagen, inVieweg Hand- buch Kraftfahrzeugtechnik(Springer Fachmedien Wies- baden, 2021...

    2021

  127. [135]

    U. Mans, J. Robbers, J. Rabbie, and T. van der Veen, Mapping quantum supply chains: Towards european technology sovereignty in an emerging industry (2023)

    2023

  128. [136]

    U. Mans, J. Robbers, J. Rabbie, and T. van der Veen, Mapping the supply chains for quantum communica- tion: Towards european technology sovereignty in an emerging industry (2023)

    2023

  129. [137]

    OICA, 2023 production statistics (2023)

    2023

  130. [138]

    IETF, Quantum internet research group (qirg) (2024)

    2024

  131. [139]

    Meinel, L

    C. Meinel, L. Leifer, and H. Plattner,Design thinking: Understand-improve-apply (Springer, 2011)

    2011

  132. [140]

    Wilms, R

    A. Wilms, R. Kirschner, and M. Manesh, Der Prozess des agilen Forschungs- und Techniktransfers – ein Erfahrungsbericht aus der Industrie am Beispiel der Porsche Digital GmbH, in Chancen und Risiken von Quantentechnologien, edited by A. Wilms and F.Neukart(SpringerFachmedien,Wi...

    2022

  133. [141]

    Slepyan, S

    G. Slepyan, S. Vlasenko, D. Mogilevtsev, and A. Boag, Quantum Radars and Lidars: Concepts, realizations, and perspectives, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine 64, 16 (2022)

    2022

  134. [142]

    Liu, C.-W

    H. Liu, C.-W. Lin, E. Kang, S. Shiraishi, and D. M. Blough, A Byzantine-Tolerant Distributed Consen- sus Algorithm for Connected Vehicles Using Proof- of-Eligibility, in Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM Conference on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and M...

  135. [143]

    Wiesner, Conjugate coding, SIGACT News15, 78–88 (1983)

    S. Wiesner, Conjugate coding, SIGACT News15, 78–88 (1983)

    1983

  136. [144]

    Gavinsky, Quantum Money with Classical Verifica- tion, in2012 IEEE 27th Conference on Computational Complexity (2012) pp

    D. Gavinsky, Quantum Money with Classical Verifica- tion, in2012 IEEE 27th Conference on Computational Complexity (2012) pp. 42–52, iSSN: 1093-0159

    2012

  137. [145]

    Cao, B.-H

    X.-Y. Cao, B.-H. Li, Y. Wang, Y. Fu, H.-L. Yin, and Z.- B. Chen, Experimental quantum e-commerce, Science Advances 10, eadk3258 (2024)

    2024

  138. [146]

    K. L. van der Enden, R. Kirschner, M. Krumtünger, and A. Wilms, Data supporting manuscript (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.