Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Signatures of Non-Abelian Kitaev quantum spin liquids in noise magnetormetry

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that the relaxation time of a nitrogen-vacancy (NV) center qubit above a vacancy-doped Kitaev spin liquid carries a sharp, field-tunable signature of Majorana zero modes bound to the vacancies.

desk verdict New NV-magnetometry route to vacancy-bound Majoranas in Kitaev spin liquids, but the quantitative resonance positions hinge on unspecified flux-gap denominators that must be pinned down. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.19165 v2 pith:SC3P4IJU submitted 2025-01-31 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hall

Xiao Xiao , Masahiro O. Takahashi , Paul Stevenson , Satoshi Fujimoto , Arun Bansil This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mes-hall
keywords KitaevquantumspinliquidMajoranazeromodesNVcentermagnetometryT1relaxationvacancydefectsnon-Abeliananyonsnoisespectroscopyα-RuCl3
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes that a nitrogen-vacancy (NV) center qubit placed above a vacancy-doped Kitaev spin liquid can act as a detector for the non-Abelian phase. The argument is that a Zeeman field releases dangling Majorana fermions at lattice vacancies, which hybridize into low-energy modes together with Majorana zero modes bound to the vacancies, and that the NV relaxation rate $1/T_1$ jumps whenever the NV working frequency matches the energy difference between a hybridized mode and a zero mode. Because an external field tunes that energy difference, the signature is a field-swept resonance rather than a fixed background feature. This matters because detecting isolated Majorana zero modes is regarded as a key step toward fault-tolerant topological quantum computation, and current experimental probes of Kitaev materials rely mostly on tunneling and thermal-transport measurements.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is a quadratic effective Majorana Hamiltonian (Supplementary Eq. S34), obtained by treating the Zeeman term as a perturbation to order $h^3$ in the Kitaev honeycomb model. Away from vacancies the field renormalizes the $c$-Majorana nearest-neighbor hopping and generates next-nearest-neighbor hopping; on the sites bordering a vacancy it couples the released dangling $b$-Majoranas to the itinerant $c$-Majoranas, which is what produces the MZMs and the low-energy hybridized modes. This Hamiltonian enters the $1/T_1$ formula of Eq. (1), a Fermi golden-rule expression in which the relaxation rate is a lattice sum of the spin correlation matrix evaluated at the NV frequency, weighted by a dipole-orientation matrix; the spatial approximation of Eq. (6) then reduces the signal to a $1/r^6$ falloff set by the principal components of the correlation and orientation matrices at each vacancy, which is why the maximum of $1/T_1$ sits away from the vacancy positions.

What would settle it

Compute the flux-gap energy denominators $\Delta_1$, $\Delta_2$, $\Delta_3$ of the supplementary perturbation theory from the microscopic Kitaev parameters and check whether the resulting hybridized-mode spectrum reproduces the resonance fields of Fig. 2; if the true denominators shift the predicted $1/T_1$ peak to a Zeeman field where no enhanced relaxation is observed in a vacancy-doped sample, the central claim fails. Alternatively, a fixed-frequency noise-magnetometry scan over field that shows no $1/T_1$ peak anywhere in the perturbative window would falsify the prediction directly.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper shows that the $T_1$-based noise spectrum of an NV center is a sensitive, field-tunable probe of Majorana zero modes (MZMs) trapped at vacancies in a non-Abelian Kitaev quantum spin liquid (KQSL). In a site-diluted Kitaev honeycomb model at the isotropic point, each vacancy leaves dangling $b$-Majorana fermions on its neighboring sites; a Zeeman field releases these from the local $Z_2$ gauge structure and hybridizes them with the itinerant $c$-Majorana fermions, producing MZMs bound to the vacancies together with low-energy hybridized modes whose wave functions overlap strongly with the vacancy-adjacent sites. The spin correlations of these modes enter the NV relaxation rate through a Fermi golden-rule expression, so $1/T_1$ increases sharply whenever the NV working frequency matches the energy difference between a hybridized mode and an MZM, and the external Zeeman field sweeps that difference through resonance. Because spin correlations away from the vacancies are gated by the large flux gap, the predicted $1/T_1$ enhancement stands out from other fluctuations in the spin liquid and should be observable in candidate materials such as $\alpha$-RuCl$_3$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the perturbative effective Hamiltonian in Supplementary Section II is quantitatively accurate, because the flux-gap energy denominators $\Delta$, $\Delta_1$, $\Delta_2$, $\Delta_3$ appearing in Eqs. (S23)-(S38) are never computed or stated in the paper, yet they set the hybridized-mode energies and therefore the Zeeman-field values at which the predicted $1/T_1$ peaks occur.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • NV noise magnetometry becomes a field-tunable diagnostic for the non-Abelian phase in Kitaev materials, supplementing tunneling and thermal-Hall measurements.
  • Holding the NV frequency fixed and sweeping the Zeeman field should produce a $1/T_1$ peak whenever the field brings the MZM-hybridized-mode energy difference through resonance.
  • Because spin correlations away from vacancies are gated by the flux gap, the predicted $T_1$ signature should survive at temperatures up to roughly 3 K and against other spin fluctuations in the spin liquid.
  • Rotating the in-plane Zeeman field away from the $a$-axis can lower the field needed for the first $1/T_1$ resonance to about $0.01J$, easing experimental requirements.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mechanism should generalize beyond pairs of vacancies: any defect that binds Ising anyons in a Kitaev spin liquid (a possibility the paper itself notes) should produce an analogous field-tunable $1/T_1$ resonance, so the same measurement could map which defects in a real material actually host zero modes.
  • The offset of the maximum $1/T_1$ away from the vacancy positions is a distinctive fingerprint: a signal from an ordinary local magnetic impurity would peak directly above the defect, so imaging the relaxation-rate pattern could distinguish fractionalized Majorana physics from impurity magnetism.
  • A practical test is an exfoliated Kitaev-material flake bonded to diamond with controlled vacancies: holding the NV frequency fixed and sweeping the in-plane field should give a $1/T_1$ peak at the predicted resonance field, and the absence of any such peak across the accessible field range would rule the scenario out.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes using T1-based noise magnetometry with an NV center qubit to detect Majorana zero modes bound to vacancies in a non-Abelian Kitaev quantum spin liquid. In the Majorana representation, a Zeeman field releases the dangling b-Majorana fermions adjacent to a vacancy, which hybridize with the itinerant c-Majorana sector and form low-energy modes; the authors show that the NV relaxation rate 1/T1 is resonantly enhanced when the NV working frequency Omega = Omega_0 + (g_q/g_s) EZ matches the energy difference between such a hybridized mode and a vacancy-bound MZM. The paper derives the 1/T1 formula and the required spin correlation functions, constructs a third-order perturbative effective Majorana Hamiltonian for the vacancy sector (Supplementary Section II), and computes the field-dependent 1/T1 spectrum and its spatial distribution for one vacancy-pair configuration on a 40x40 lattice, with additional data for NV polarization, temperature, and field direction in the supplement. The authors estimate signal increments of order 30 Hz at d=30a and 3 kHz at d=10a at roughly 1 T and 1 K, and discuss the experimental challenges.

Significance. If the mechanism proposed here works in practice, NV noise magnetometry would be a genuinely new, non-invasive, local probe of vacancy-bound Majorana zero modes in Kitaev materials, complementary to the thermal Hall and tunneling techniques emphasized in the introduction. The paper makes falsifiable qualitative predictions that are already useful: the resonance is field-tunable (Fig. 2), and the maximal signal is displaced from the vacancy cores (Fig. 3), a feature the authors verify by comparing the approximation in Eq. (6) with the full expression in Eq. (1). The derivation of the projected spin correlation function in Supplementary Section III (Eqs. (S51)-(S77)) is non-trivial, and the 1/T1 peaks in Fig. 2(b) emerge from the spectrum of the effective Hamiltonian rather than being fitted to the target result, so circularity is not a concern. The main caveat is quantitative: the flux-gap denominators that set the scale of the effective Hamiltonian are never stated, and the perturbation expansion is used near the edge of its validity, so the predicted resonance fields must be regarded as provisional until those inputs are provided or benchmarked numerically.

major comments (3)
  1. [Supplementary Section II, Eqs. (S23)-(S38)] The effective hopping matrix T that determines the hybridized-mode energies in Fig. 2(a), and therefore the resonance field in Fig. 2(b), is built from the couplings J~', J~'', kappa', kappa'', t^(1), and t^(2) in Eqs. (S23)-(S26) and (S35)-(S38), each of which contains inverse powers of the flux-gap denominators Delta_1, Delta_2, Delta_3 (and of the unspecified Delta_in in Eq. (S36)). These local flux-gap energies are never computed or stated in the paper or the supplement; the only related number given is the bulk flux gap of about 0.065J (main text, Ref. [67]), which applies to flux flips far from vacancies and may differ from the vacancy-adjacent values that the paper itself keeps distinct. Because the predicted 1/T1 peak position is an eigenvalue of the effective matrix T, the central quantitative claim of the paper is not reproducible or independently checkable without these inputs. I request that the authors report the computed values of Delta_1, Delta_2, Delta_3 (and Delta_in) for the bound-flux background, state the conversion between the perturbative field h and the plotted EZ, and show how the resonance fields in Fig. 2(b) shift under O(1) variations of these denominators.
  2. [Supplementary Section II.D; Fig. 2(a)] The effective Hamiltonian in Supplement Section II is quoted as accurate to order h^3, but at the resonance fields shown in Fig. 2(a) the expansion parameter is not small: the ratio of the t^(1) to t^(0) couplings is of order h/Delta, which lies between roughly 0.3 and 0.6 at EZ ~ 0.02-0.03J with Delta ~ 0.065J. The hybridized-mode energies are therefore subject to possibly large corrections from the omitted orders, so the quantitative accuracy of the predicted peak positions is not established. I recommend benchmarking the effective Hamiltonian against exact diagonalization or a higher-order calculation for the same vacancy configuration on a small cluster; if that is not feasible, the quantitative claims in the Results section and in Supplementary Section V should be reframed as order-of-magnitude estimates. This concern does not affect the qualitative mechanism, namely a low-energy mode whose energy grows with the Zeeman field and crosses the NV working frequency.
  3. [Results and discussion; Figs. 2-3] All numerical results (Figs. 2, 3, S3-S6) are obtained for one vacancy configuration on one supercell: vacancies at the A-sublattice of unit cell (32,27) and the B-sublattice of unit cell (9,14) on a 40x40 lattice with the Zeeman field along the a-axis. The abstract and the summary claim a general pathway for identifying non-Abelian KQSLs, but no robustness scan over vacancy separation, sublattice arrangement, or supercell size is provided. This matters for the experimental estimates, because the spatial footprint (over one-third of the supercell) is a property of the wavefunction geometry of this particular configuration. I would like to see at least one additional configuration (for example, two vacancies on the same sublattice, or a significantly different separation) to confirm that the field-tunable resonance and the size of the footprint are robust features rather than artifacts of the chosen geometry.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title and abstract] The title contains the typo 'magnetormetry' for 'magnetometry', and the same misspelling pattern appears as 'Kiteav' and 'Kiatev' throughout the main text and supplement (for example, 'Kiteav honeycomb model' in the introduction, 'Kiteav lattice' in the Fig. 1 caption, and 'KITAEV'/'Kiatev' in Supplementary Section II).
  2. [Main text, Eq. (1) and Fig. 2] The resonance condition used to interpret Fig. 2 (the NV frequency being matched by the energy difference between a hybridized mode and an MZM, with Omega = Omega_0 + (g_q/g_s) EZ) is stated only in words; an explicit equation, together with the conversion between EZ and the perturbative field h of the supplement, would greatly improve reproducibility.
  3. [Fig. 3(d) caption] In the Fig. 3(d) caption, 'are obtained rom Eq. (1)' should read 'are obtained from Eq. (1)'.
  4. [Supplementary Section V, Eq. (S80)] In Supplementary Section V, the quoted increments (1/T1 larger than 30 Hz at d=30a and 3 kHz at d=10a over one-third of the supercell) should specify the baseline against which the increment is measured, and a short sensitivity statement for the assumed g-factors (g_q = 2, g_s = 2.5) and the J range (2.8-6.8 meV) would help the reader assess the robustness of the estimates.
  5. [Fig. S4] In Fig. S4, the three temperature curves are not labeled in the caption; please state which curve corresponds to k_B T = 0.01J, 0.02J, and 0.05J, since the claim that bulk-mode contributions remain small at roughly 3 K relies on distinguishing them.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the predicted 1/T1 resonance is computed from an independent Majorana effective theory, not fitted to the claimed signal.

full rationale

The paper's central prediction is that 1/T1 of an NV center is enhanced when the NV working frequency matches the energy difference between a vacancy-bound Majorana zero mode and a low-energy hybridized Majorana mode. This condition is not imposed by hand; it emerges from the computed spectrum of a quadratic Majorana effective Hamiltonian. The 1/T1 formula in Eq. (1) follows from Fermi's golden rule and a standard magnetic-dipole coupling, and the spin correlations in Eq. (5) are evaluated from the eigenfunctions and eigenenergies of that Hamiltonian via Wick's theorem. No equation reduces the predicted peak position to a refitted version of the target observable, and no parameter is adjusted to reproduce a desired 1/T1 spectrum. The perturbative effective Hamiltonian in Supplementary Section II is based on Kitaev's exact Majorana representation and standard second- and third-order perturbation theory; the flux-gap denominators Delta, Delta1, Delta2, and Delta3 are not given numerical values, which is a reproducibility gap but not evidence of circularity, because nothing indicates they were chosen to force the resonance. Citations to prior work by the same authors, notably Takahashi et al. PRL 131, 236701 (2023), are used for technical tools such as projection-operator identities and determinant evaluation, and for the established vacancy-bound Ising anyon picture; those results are independently published and the present prediction does not reduce to them by construction. The bulk flux-gap value ~0.065J is taken from an external reference and used only to justify neglecting bulk spin correlations below the gap. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained with respect to the claimed 1/T1 noise signature; the main weaknesses are missing numerical inputs and experimental feasibility, not circular reasoning.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The calculation is parameter-free except for the unstated flux-gap energy denominators and the standard model parameters (J, h, temperature), so the ledger is short. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Flux-gap energy denominators Delta, Delta1, Delta2, Delta3 = not stated
    Energy costs for flipping local Z2 gauge fields in the perturbative effective Hamiltonian (Supplementary Eqs. S23-S38). Their numerical values are not given, yet they set the hybridized mode energies and hence the 1/T1 peak positions.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Kitaev Majorana representation and conservation of Z2 gauge fields
    Used to map the spin model to a quadratic Majorana Hamiltonian.
  • domain assumption Bound-flux sector is the ground state of site-diluted non-Abelian KQSL
    Cites [52-55]; if a different flux sector had lower energy, vacancy-bound Majorana modes would differ.
  • domain assumption Zeeman term is treated perturbatively to order h^3
    Requires E_Z << J; the paper uses E_Z up to 0.06J, which is borderline.
  • standard math Spin correlations away from vacancies vanish below the flux gap
    Follows from the selection rule and the flux gap; used to restrict the sum in Eq. (1) to vacancy-neighboring sites.
  • standard math NV center couples via magnetic dipole and T1 is computed from Fermi's golden rule
    Standard formalism in NV magnetometry.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Signatures of Non-Abelian Kitaev quantum spin liquids in noise magnetormetry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SC3P4IJU

@misc{pith2026250119165,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Signatures of Non-Abelian Kitaev quantum spin liquids in noise magnetormetry},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SC3P4IJU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.19165}
}
abstract

Identification of isolated Majorana zero modes (MZMs) is a key step towards the realization of fault-tolerant topological quantum computation. Here we show how the $T_1$-based noise magnetormetry of a nitrogen-vacancy (NV) center qubit can reveal the unique signatures of Majorana fermions attached to vacancies in a non-Abelian Kitaev quantum spin liquid (KQSL). The $1/T_1$ of the NV center is found to be increased significantly when the working frequency of the NV center matches the energy difference between a MZM and a low-energy hybridized mode involving dangling Majorana fermions adjacent to vacancies. In experiments, this energy difference can be tuned by an external Zeeman field. Because of the large excitation gap of flipping a local $Z_2$ gauge field, the $1/T_1$ spectrum is robust against other fluctuations in KQSLs. Our study presents a promising pathway for identifying the non-Abelian phase in Kitaev materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.19165 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic experimental setup showing an NV center [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Non-Abelian KQSL with a pair of vacancies in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Impurity quadrupole moments as local probes of flux sectors in the Kitaev spin liquid

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Spin-3/2 impurity quadrupole moments in a Kitaev spin liquid jump discontinuously at flux-sector transitions and can therefore identify the surrounding emergent-flux sector.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [67]

    Baskaran, S

    G. Baskaran, S. Mandal,and R. Shankar, Exact Results for Spin Dynamics and Fractionalization in the Kitaev Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 247201 (2007)

    work page 2007

  2. [1]

    Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond, Ann

    A. Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond, Ann. Phys. 321, 2 (2006)

    2006

  3. [2]

    Kells, J

    G. Kells, J. K. Slingerland, and J. Vala, Description of Ki- taev’s honeycomb model with toric-code stabilizers, Phys. Rev. B 80, 125415 (2009)

    2009

  4. [3]

    Terhal, Quantum error correction for quantum memo- ries, Rev

    B. Terhal, Quantum error correction for quantum memo- ries, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 307 (2015)

    work page 2015

  5. [4]

    Nayak, S

    C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Non-abelian anyons and topological quantum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1083 (2008)

    2008

  6. [5]

    Qi, and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi, and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and su- perconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2008)

    work page 2008

  7. [6]

    Alicea, New directions in the pursuit of Majorana fermions in solid state systems, Rep

    J. Alicea, New directions in the pursuit of Majorana fermions in solid state systems, Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 5 076501 (2012)

    work page 2012

  8. [7]

    S. D. Sarma, M. Freedman, and C. Nayak, Majorana zero modes and topological quantum computation, npj Quan- tum Information 1, 15001 (2015)

    work page 2015

Show all 83 references
  1. [8]

    Sato, and Y

    M. Sato, and Y. Ando, Topological superconductors: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 076501 (2017)

    2017

  2. [9]

    Jackeli and G

    G. Jackeli and G. Khaliullin, Mott Insulators in the Strong Spin-Orbit Coupling Limit: From Heisenberg to a Quan- tum Compass and Kitaev Models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 017205 (2009)

    2009

  3. [10]

    Chaloupka, G

    J. Chaloupka, G. Jackeli and G. Khaliullin, Kitaev- Heisenberg Model on a Honeycomb Lattice: Possible Ex- otic Phases in Iridium Oxides A 2IrO3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 027204 (2010)

    2010

  4. [11]

    K. W. Plumb, J. P. Clancy, L. J. Sandilands, V. V. Shankar, Y. F. Hu, K. S. Burch, H.-Y. Kee, and Y.-J. Kim, α-RuCl3: A spin-orbit assisted Mott insulator on a honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. B 90, 041112(R) (2014)

    2014

  5. [12]

    Kubota, H

    Y. Kubota, H. Tanaka, T. Ono, Y. Narumi, and K. Kindo, Successive magnetic phase transitions in α-RuCl3: XY-like frustrated magnet on the honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. B 91, 094422 (2015)

    2015

  6. [13]

    Rousochatzakis, J

    I. Rousochatzakis, J. Reuther, R. Thomale, S. Rachel, and N. B. Perkins, Phase Diagram and Quantum Order by Disorder in the Kitaev K1-K2 Honeycomb Magnet, Phys. Rev. X 5, 041035 (2015)

    2015

  7. [14]

    L. J. Sandilands, Y. Tian, K. W. Plumb, Y.-J. Kim, and K. S. Burch, Scattering Continuum and Possible Fraction- alized Excitations in α-RuCl3, Phys. Rev. B 91, 241110(R) (2015)

    2015

  8. [15]

    H.-S. Kim, V. Vijay Shankar, A. Catuneanu, and H.-Y. Kee, Kitaev magnetism in honeycomb RuCl 3 with inter- mediate spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. B 91, 241110(R) (2015)

    2015

  9. [16]

    Kim, and H.-Y

    H.-S. Kim, and H.-Y. Kee, Crystal structure and mag- netism in α-RuCl3: An ab initio study, Phys. Rev. B 93, 155143 (2016)

    2016

  10. [17]

    J. Nasu, J. Knolle, D. L. Kovrizhin, Y. Motome, and R. Moessner. Fermionic response from fractionalization in an insulating two-dimensional magnet, Nat. Phys. 12, 912 (2016)

    2016

  11. [18]

    Banerjee, C

    A. Banerjee, C. A. Bridges, J.-Q. Yan, A. A. Aczel, L. Li, M. B. Stone, G. E. Granroth, M. D. Lumsden, Y. Yiu, J. Knolle, S. Bhattacharjee, D. L. Kovrizhin, R. Moessner, D. A. Tennant, D. G. Mandrus, and S. E. Nagler Prox- imate Kitaev quantum spin liquid behaviour in a honey-...

    2016

  12. [19]

    Banerjee, J

    A. Banerjee, J. Yan, J. Knolle, C. A. Bridges, M. B. Stone, M. D. Lumsden, D. G. Mandrus, D. A. Tennant, R. Moessner, S. E. Nagler Neutron scattering in the prox- imate quantum spin liquid α-RuCl3, Science 356, 1055 (2017)

    2017

  13. [20]

    Trebst, Kitaev Materials, arXiv:1701.07056 (2017)

    S. Trebst, Kitaev Materials, arXiv:1701.07056 (2017)

    2017 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Takagi, T

    H. Takagi, T. Takayama, G. Jackeli, G. Khaliullin, and S. E. Nagler, Concept and realization of Kitaev quantum spin liquids, Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 264 (2019)

    2019

  15. [22]

    Hermanns, I

    M. Hermanns, I. Kimchi, and J. Knolle, Physics of the Kitaev model: fractionalization, dynamical correlations, and material connections, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 9, 17 (2018)

    2018

  16. [23]

    Baek, S.-H

    S.-H. Baek, S.-H. Do, K.-Y. Choi, Y. S. Kwon, A. U. B. Wolter, S. Nishimoto, J. van den Brink, and B. Buchner, Evidence for a Field-Induced Quantum Spin Liquid in α- RuCl3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 037201 (2017)

    2017

  17. [24]

    J. A. Sears, Y. Zhao, Z. Xu, J. W. Lynn, and Y.-J. Kim, Phase diagram of α-RuCl3 in an in-plane magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 95, 180411(R) (2017)

    2017

  18. [25]

    A. U. B. Wolter, L. T. Corredor, L. Janssen, K. Nenkov, S. Sch¨ onecker, S.-H. Do, K.-Y. Choi, R. Albrecht, J. Hunger, T. Doert, M. Vojta, and B. Buchner, Field- induced quantum criticality in the Kitaev system α- RuCl3, Phys. Rev. B 96, 041405(R) (2017)

    2017

  19. [26]

    I. A. Leahy, C. A. Pocs, P. E. Siegfried, D. Graf, S.-H. Do, K.-Y. Choi, B. Normand, and M. Lee, Anomalous Thermal Conductivity and Magnetic Torque Response in the Honeycomb Magnet α-RuCl3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 187203 (2017)

    2017

  20. [27]

    Jansa, A

    N. Jansa, A. Zorko, M. Gomilsek, M. Pregelj, K. W. Kramer, D. Biner, A. Biffin, C. Ruegg, and M. Klanjsek, Observation of two types of fractional excitation in the Ki- taev honeycomb magnet, Nature Physics 14, 786 (2018)

    2018

  21. [28]

    Banerjee, P

    A. Banerjee, P. Lampen-Kelley, J. Knolle, C. Balz, A. A. Aczel, B. Winn, Y. Liu, D. Pajerowski, J. Yan, C. A. Bridges, A. T. Savici, B. C. Chakoumakos, M. D. Lums- den, D. A. Tennant, R. Moessner, D. G. Mandrus, and S. E. Nagler, Excitations in the field-induced quantum spin l...

    2018

  22. [29]

    Hentrich, A

    R. Hentrich, A. U. B. Wolter, X. Zotos, W. Brenig, D. Nowak, A. Isaeva, T. Doert, A. Banerjee, P. LampenKel- ley, D. G. Mandrus, S. E. Nagler, J. Sears, Y.-J. Kim, B. Buchner, and C. Hess, Unusual Phonon Heat Transport in α-RuCl3: Strong Spin-Phonon Scattering and Field- Induc...

    2018

  23. [30]

    Widmann, V

    S. Widmann, V. Tsurkan, D. A. Prishchenko, V. G. Mazurenko, A. A. Tsirlin, and A. Loidl, Thermodynamic evidence of fractionalized excitations in α-RuCl3, Phys. Rev. B 99, 094415 (2019)

    2019

  24. [31]

    C. Balz, P. Lampen-Kelley, A. Banerjee, J. Yan, Z. Lu, X. Hu, S. M. Yadav, Y. Takano, Y. Liu, D. A. Tennant, M. D. Lumsden, D. Mandrus, and S. E. Nagler, Finite field regime for a quantum spin liquid in α-RuCl3, Phys. Rev. B 100, 060405(R) (2019)

    2019

  25. [32]

    Czajka, T

    P. Czajka, T. Gao, M. Hirschberger, P. Lampen-Kelley, A. Banerjee, J. Yan, D. G. Mandrus, S. E. Nagler, and N. P. Ong, Oscillations of the thermal conductivity in the spin-liquid state of α-Rucl3, Nat. Phys. 17, 915 (2021)

    2021

  26. [33]

    Tanaka, Y

    O. Tanaka, Y. Mizukami, R. Harasawa, K. Hashimoto, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, S. Fujimoto, Y. Matsuda, E.-G. Moon, and T. Shibauchi, Thermodynamic evidence for a field- angle-dependent Majorana gap in a Kitaev spin liquid, Nat. Phys. 18, 429 (2022)

    2022

  27. [34]

    Czajka, T

    P. Czajka, T. Gao, M. Hirschberger, P. Lampen-Kelley, A. Banerjee, N. Quirk, D. G. Mandrus, S. E. Nagler, and N. P. Ong, Planar thermal hall effect of topological bosons in the kitaev magnet α-RuCl3, Nat. Mater. 22, 36 (2023)

    2023

  28. [35]

    Kasahara, T

    Y. Kasahara, T. Ohnishi, Y. Mizukami, O. Tanaka, S. Ma, K. Sugii, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, J. Nasu, Y. Mo- tome, T. Shibauchi, and Y. Matsuda, Majorana quanti- zation and half-integer thermal quantum hall effect in a kitaev spin liquid, Nature 559, 227 (2018)

    2018

  29. [36]

    Yamashita, J

    M. Yamashita, J. Gouchi, Y. Uwatoko, N. Kurita, and H. Tanaka, Sample dependence of half-integer quantized thermal Hall effect in the Kitaev spin-liquid candidate α- RuCl3, Phys. Rev. B 102, 220404(R) (2020)

    2020

  30. [37]

    Yokoi, S

    T. Yokoi, S. Ma, Y. Kasahara, S. Kasahara, T. Shibauchi, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, J. Nasu, Y. Motome, C. Hickey, S. Trebst, and Y. Matsuda, Half-integer quantized anoma- lous thermal Hall effect in the Kitaev material candidate 6 α-RuCl3, Science 373, 568 (2021)

    2021

  31. [38]

    J. A. N. Bruin, R. R. Claus, Y. Matsumoto, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, and H. Takagi, Robustness of the thermal Hall effect close to half-quantization inα-RuCl3, Nat. Phys. 18, 401 (2022)

    2022

  32. [39]

    Sahasrabudhe, D

    A. Sahasrabudhe, D. A. S. Kaib, S. Reschke, R. Ger- man, T. C. Koethe, J. Buhot, D. Kamenskyi, C. Hickey, P. Becker, V. Tsurkan, A. Loidl, S. H. Do, K. Y. Choi, M. Gruninger, S. M. Winter, Z. Wang, R. Valenti, and P. H. M. van Loosdrecht, High-field quantum disordered state in...

    2020

  33. [40]

    Bachus, D

    S. Bachus, D. A. S. Kaib, Y. Tokiwa, A. Jesche, V. Tsurkan, A. Loidl, S. M. Winter, A. A. Tsirlin, R. Valenti, and P. Gegenwart, Thermodynamic Perspective on Field- Induced Behavior of α-RuCl3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 097203 (2020)

    2020

  34. [41]

    Aasen, R

    D. Aasen, R. S. K. Mong, B. M. Hunt, D. Mandrus, and J. Alicea, Electrical Probes of the Non-Abelian Spin Liq- uid in Kitaev Materials, Phys. Rev. X 10, 031014 (2020)

    2020

  35. [42]

    E. J. Konig, M. T. Randeria, and B. Jack, Tunneling spec- ¨ troscopy of quantum spin liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 267206 (2020)

    2020

  36. [43]

    R. G. Pereira and R. Egger, Electrical access to ising anyons in kitaev spin liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 227202 (2020)

    2020

  37. [44]

    Feldmeier, W

    J. Feldmeier, W. Natori, M. Knap, and J. Knolle, Local probes for charge-neutral edge states in two-dimensional quantum magnets, Phys. Rev. B 102, 134423 (2020)

    2020

  38. [45]

    Udagawa, S

    M. Udagawa, S. Takayoshi, and T. Oka, Scanning tunnel- ing microscopy as a single majorana detector of kitaev’s chiral spin liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 127201 (2021)

    2021

  39. [46]

    Bauer, L

    T. Bauer, L. R. D. Freitas, R. G. Pereira, and R. Egger, Scanning tunneling spectroscopy of majorana zero modes in a kitaev spin liquid, Phys. Rev. B 107, 054432 (2023)

    2023

  40. [47]

    M. O. Takahashi, M. G. Yamada, M. Udagawa, T. Mizushima, and S. Fujimoto, Non-local spin correlation as a signature of ising anyons trapped in vacancies of the kitaev spin liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 236701 (2023)

    2023

  41. [48]

    W.-H. Kao, N. B. Perkins, G. B Halasz, Vacancy spec- troscopy of non-Abelian Kitaev spin liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 136503 (2024)

    2024

  42. [49]

    G. B. Halasz, Gate-Controlled Anyon Generation and Detection in Kitaev Spin Liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 206501 (2024)

    2024

  43. [50]

    A. Go, J. Jung, E.-G. Moon, Vestiges of Topological Phase Transitions in Kitaev Quantum Spin Liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 147203 (2019)

    2019

  44. [51]

    W. Choi, K. H. Lee, and Y. B. Kim, Vestiges of Topolog- ical Phase Transitions in Kitaev Quantum Spin Liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 117205 (2020)

    2020

  45. [52]

    A. J. Willans, J. T. Chalker, and R. Moessner, Disorder in a quantum spin liquid: Flux binding and local moment formation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 237203 (2010)

    2010

  46. [53]

    A. J. Willans, J. T. Chalker, and R. Moessner, Site di- lution in the kitaev honeycomb model, Phys. Rev. B 84, 115146 (2011)

    2011

  47. [54]

    W.-H. Kao, J. Knolle, G. B. Halasz, R. Moessner, and N. B. Perkins, Vacancy-Induced Low-Energy Density of States in the Kitaev Spin Liquid, Phys. Rev. X 11, 011034 (2021)

    2021

  48. [55]

    Imamura, Y

    K. Imamura, Y. Mizukami, O. Tanaka, R. Grasset, M. Konczykowski, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, Y. Matsuda, M. G. Yamada, K. Hashimoto, T. Shibauchi, Defect-Induced Low-Energy Majorana Excitations in the Kitaev Magnet α-RuCl3, Phys. Rev. X 14, 011045 (2024)

    2024

  49. [56]

    Casola, T

    F. Casola, T. van der Sar, and A. Yacoby, Probing condensed matter physics with magnetometry based on nitrogen-vacancy centres in diamond, Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 17088 (2018)

    2018

  50. [57]

    Agarwal, R

    K. Agarwal, R. Schmidt, B. Halperin, V. Oganesyan, G. Zarand, M. D. Lukin, and E. Demler, Magnetic noise spec- troscopy as a probe of local electronic correlations in two- dimensional systems, Phys. Rev. B 95, 155107 (2017)

    2017

  51. [58]

    Ariyaratne, D

    A. Ariyaratne, D. Bluvstein, B. A. Myers, and A. C. B. Jayich, Nanoscale electrical conductivity imaging using a nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond, Nat. Commun. 9, 2406 (2018)

    2018

  52. [59]

    P. E. Dolgirev, S. Chatterjee, I. Esterlis, A. A. Zibrov, M. D. Lukin, N. Y. Yao, and E. Demler, Characterizing two- dimensional superconductivity via nanoscale noise magne- tometry with single-spin qubits, Phys. Rev. B105, 024507 (2022)

    2022

  53. [60]

    J. Y. Khoo, F. Pientka, P. A. Lee, and I. S. Villadiego, Probing the quantum noise of the spinon Fermi surface with NV centers, Phys. Rev. B 106, 115108 (2022)

    2022

  54. [61]

    P. A. Lee and S. Morampudi, Proposal to detect emergent gauge field and its Meissner effect in spin liquids using NV centers, Phys. Rev. B 107, 195102 (2023)

    2023

  55. [62]

    Chatterjee, J

    S. Chatterjee, J. F. Rodriguez-Nieva, and E. Demler, Di- agnosing phases of magnetic insulators via noise magne- tometry with spin qubits, Phys. Rev. B 99, 104425 (2019)

    2019

  56. [63]

    J. F. Rodriguez-Nieva, D. Podolsky, and E. Demler, Probing hydrodynamic sound modes in magnon fluids us- ing spin magnetometers, Phys. Rev. B105, 174412 (2022)

    2022

  57. [64]

    L. S. Langsjoen, A. Poudel, M. G. Vavilov, and R. Joynt, Qubit relaxation from evanescent-wave Johnson noise, Phys. Rev. A 86, 010301(R) (2012)

    2012

  58. [65]

    3 (a) -0.05 0 0.05 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 10-4 10-2 100 102(b) FIG

    for details). 3 (a) -0.05 0 0.05 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 10-4 10-2 100 102(b) FIG. 2. Non-Abelian KQSL with a pair of vacancies in the bound-flux sector: (a) the low-energy portion of the spectrum as a function of Zeeman energy of a Kitaev spin EZ , with hy- bridized m...

  59. [66]

    See supplementary materials for details

  60. [68]

    Knolle, D

    J. Knolle, D. L. Kovrizhin, J. T. Chalker, and R. Moess- ner, Dynamics of a Two-Dimensional Quantum Spin Liq- uid: Signatures of Emergent Majorana Fermions and Fluxes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 207203 (2014)

    2014

  61. [69]

    Eichstaedt, Y

    C. Eichstaedt, Y. Zhang, P. Laurell, S. Okamoto, A. G. Eguiluz, and T. Berlijn, Deriving models for the Kitaev spin-liquid candidate material α-RuCl3 from first princi- ples, Phys. Rev. B 100, 075110 (2019)

    2019

  62. [70]

    B. A. Myers, A. Ariyaratne, and A. C. B. Jayich, Double- Quantum Spin-Relaxation Limits to Coherence of Near- Surface Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 197201 (2017)

    2017

  63. [71]

    Sangtawesin, B

    S. Sangtawesin, B. L. Dwyer, S. Srinivasan, J. J. Allred, L. V. H. Rodgers, K. De Greve, A. Stacey, N. Dontschuk, K. M. O’Donnell, D. Hu, D. A. Evans, C. Jaye, D. A. Fischer, M. L. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, H. Park, M. D. Lukin, N. P. de Leon, Origins of diamond surface noise p...

    2019

  64. [72]

    Jarmola, V

    A. Jarmola, V. M. Acosta, K. Jensen, S. Chemerisov, and D. Budker, Temperature- and Magnetic-Field-Dependent Longitudinal Spin Relaxation in Nitrogen-Vacancy En- sembles in Diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 197601 (2012)

    2012

  65. [73]

    K. M. Roccapriore, M. G. Boebinger, O. Dyck, A. Ghosh, R. R. Unocic, S. V. Kalinin, and M. Ziatdinov, Prob- ing Electron Beam Induced Transformations on a Single- 7 Defect Level via Automated Scanning Transmission Elec- tron Microscopy, ACS Nano 16, 17116 (2022)

    2022

  66. [74]

    J. C. Thomas, W. Chen, Y. Xiong, B. A. Barker, J. Zhou, W. Chen, A. Rossi, N. Kelly, Z. Yu, D. Zhou, S. Kumari, E. S. Barnard, J. A. Robinson, M. Terrones, A. Schwartzberg, D. F. Ogletree, E. Rotenberg, M. M. Noack, S. Griffin, A. Raja, D. A. Strubbe, G.-M. Rignanese, A. Weber...

    2024

  67. [75]

    B. B. Zhou, P. C. Jerger, K.-H. Lee, M. Fukami, F. Mujid, J. Park, and D. D. Awschalom, Spatiotemporal Mapping of a Photocurrent Vortex in Monolayer MoS 2 Using Dia- mond Quantum Sensors, Phys. Rev. X 10, 011003 (2020)

    2020

  68. [76]

    Zhang, Y.-X

    X.-Y. Zhang, Y.-X. Wang, T. A. Tartaglia, T. Ding, M. J. Gray, K. S. Burch, F. Fafti, and B. B. Zhou, AC Sus- ceptometry of 2D van der Waals Magnets Enabled by the Coherent Control of Quantum Sensors, PRX Quantum 2, 030352 (2021)

    2021

  69. [77]

    Kumar, D

    J. Kumar, D. Yudilevich, A. Smooha, I. Zohar, A. K. Pariari, R. Stohr, A. Denisenko, M. Hucker, and A. Fin- kler, Room Temperature Relaxometry of Single Nitro- gen Vacancy Centers in Proximity toα-RuCl3 Nanoflakes, Nano. Lett. 24, 4793 (2024)

    2024

  70. [78]

    Welter, J

    P. Welter, J. Rhensius, A. Morales, M. S. W¨ ornle, C.-H. Lambert, G. Puebla-Hellmann, P. Gambardella, and C. L. Degen, Scanning nitrogen-vacancy center magnetometry in large in-plane magnetic fields, Appl. Phys. Lett. 120, 074003 (2022)

    2022

  71. [79]

    N. M. Beaver, N. Voce, P. Meisenheimer, R. Ramesh, and P. Stevenson, Optimizing Off-Axis Fields for Two- Axis Magnetometry with Point Defects, Appl. Phys. Lett. 124, 254001 (2024)

    2024

  72. [80]

    Stepanov, F

    V. Stepanov, F. H. Cho, C. Abeywardana, and S. Taka- hashi, High-frequency and high-field optically detected magnetic resonance of nitrogen-vacancy centers in dia- mond, Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 063111 (2015)

    2015

  73. [81]

    Fortman, L

    B. Fortman, L. Mugica-Sanchez, N. Tischler, C. Selco, Y. Hang, K. Holczer, and S. Takahashi, Electron-electron double resonance detected NMR spectroscopy using en- semble NV centers at 230 GHz and 8.3 Tesla, J. Appl. Phys. 130, 083901 (2021)

    2021

  74. [82]

    Y. Ren, C. Selco, D. Kawashiri, M. Coumans, B. Fort- man, L. S. Bouchard, K. Holczer, S. Takahashi, Demon- stration of NV-detected 13C NMR at 4.2T, Phys. Rev. B 108, 045421 (2023)

    2023

  75. [83]

    M. O. Takahashi, W.-H. Kao, S. Fujimoto, and N. B. Perkins, Z 2 flux binding to higher-spin impurities in the Kitaev spin liquid: mechanisms and implications, arXiv:2409.02190 (2024). Supplementary materials for: ‘Signatures of Non-Abelian Kitaev quantum spin liquids in noise ...

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.